Abstract
A relative clause is subordinate to a nominal element (noun or pronoun) called ``antecedent'', in order to define or complete its meaning. Therefore any language making use of relative clauses must: 1) make clear that the relative clause is indeed subordinate; 2) show which type of relation exists between the relative clause and the antecedent, i.e. what would be the grammatical function of the antecedent, should the clause be independent and include it. The different ways of answering that double constraint provide criteria for a typological classification of relative clauses. The article describes the choices made by a few Berber languages.
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Tashlhiyt's ban of complex syllable onsets: phonetic and perceptual evidence
- Derivational gender in Moroccan Berber: examples from Ayt Seghrushen
- Siwi addressee agreement and demonstrative typology
- Foundations for a typology of the annexed/absolute state systems in Berber
- Qualification and comparison in Berber. The verb-noun distinction and its Fluctuations
- Typology of relative clauses: the case of Berber
- Topicalization in Berber: a typological perspective
- Focalization process and intonation in Meridional Berber: the case of Tamasheq and Tetserret
- Typology of Eastern Medieval Berber
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Tashlhiyt's ban of complex syllable onsets: phonetic and perceptual evidence
- Derivational gender in Moroccan Berber: examples from Ayt Seghrushen
- Siwi addressee agreement and demonstrative typology
- Foundations for a typology of the annexed/absolute state systems in Berber
- Qualification and comparison in Berber. The verb-noun distinction and its Fluctuations
- Typology of relative clauses: the case of Berber
- Topicalization in Berber: a typological perspective
- Focalization process and intonation in Meridional Berber: the case of Tamasheq and Tetserret
- Typology of Eastern Medieval Berber