Home Performance Gaps, Peer Effects, and Comparative Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Local Government
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Performance Gaps, Peer Effects, and Comparative Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Local Government

  • Tim Jäkel

    Tim Jäkel is an Assistant Professor in the School of Public Administration at the National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. He holds a PhD in Political Science (Dr. rer. pol.) from the University of Heidelberg, Germany. Prior to joining the National Research University Higher School of Economics, he worked as a research fellow at the German Research Institute for Public Administration Speyer, Germany.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 15, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Centralized inspections face scepticism among local public managers, and voluntary evaluations have become a popular complement. This study uses the Swedish local government benchmarking programme (Kommunens Kvalitet i Korthet) to investigate what correlates with partaking in a benchmarking exercise empirically. This study finds evidence for temporal and spatial clustering: participants cluster geographically at an early stage of the exercise, new entrants tended to attach to existing clusters of participants rather than forming new clusters themselves. From event history analyses this study also finds that the proportion of participants among direct neighbours increases the conditional probability of entering the exercise. This suggests that public managers and local councils mimic the behaviour from nearby councils when it comes to the use of performance evaluations.

About the author

Tim Jäkel

Tim Jäkel is an Assistant Professor in the School of Public Administration at the National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. He holds a PhD in Political Science (Dr. rer. pol.) from the University of Heidelberg, Germany. Prior to joining the National Research University Higher School of Economics, he worked as a research fellow at the German Research Institute for Public Administration Speyer, Germany.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the three anonymous reviewers who provided substantial remarks, comments and suggestions on how to improve a previous version of the paper. This article benefited from the proofreading services offered by the Academic Writing Centre (AWC) at National Research University Higher School of Economics.

  1. Disclosure statement: The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Allison, P. D. (1984) Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781412984195Search in Google Scholar

Allison, P. D. (2014) Event History and Survival Analysis. Los Angeles [etc.]: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781452270029Search in Google Scholar

Ammons, D. N. and W. C. Rivenbark (2008) “Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Data to Improve Municipal Services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project,” Public Administration Review, 68(2):304–318.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00864.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ammons, D. N. and D. J. Roenigk (2015) “Benchmarking and Interorganizational Learning in Local Government,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1):309–335.10.1093/jopart/muu014Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, S. C. and M. L. Jakobsen (2018) “Political Pressure, Conformity Pressure, and Performance Information as Drivers of Public Sector Innovation Adoption,” International Public Management Journal, 21:1–30.10.1080/10967494.2018.1425227Search in Google Scholar

Ansell, C., M. Lundin and P. Öberg (2017a) “How Learning Aggregates: A Social Network Analysis of Learning between Swedish Municipalities,” Local Government Studies, 43(6):903–926.10.1080/03003930.2017.1342626Search in Google Scholar

Ansell, C., M. Lundin and P. Öberg (2017b) “Learning Networks Among Swedish Municipalities: Is Sweden a Small World?” In: (Glückler, J., E. Lazega and I. Hammer, eds.) Knowledge and Networks. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 315–336.10.1007/978-3-319-45023-0_15Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, G. (2014) “Policy Learning and Science Policy Innovation Adoption by Street-Level Bureaucrats,” Journal of Public Policy, 34(3):389–414.10.1017/S0143814X14000154Search in Google Scholar

Balla, S. J. (2001) “Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations,” American Politics Research, 29(3):221–245.10.1177/1532673X01293001Search in Google Scholar

Behn, R. D. (2003) “Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures,” Public Administration Review, 63(5):586–606.10.1111/1540-6210.00322Search in Google Scholar

Berry, F. S. and W. D. Berry (1990) “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis,” American Political Science Review, 84(2):395–415.10.2307/1963526Search in Google Scholar

Besley, T. and A. Case (1995) “Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition,” American Economic Review, 85(1):25–45.10.3386/w4041Search in Google Scholar

Bhatti, Y. and K. M. Hansen (2011) “Who ‘Marries’ Whom? The Influence of Societal Connectedness, Economic and Political Homogeneity, and Population Size on Jurisdictional Consolidations,” European Journal of Political Research, 50(2):212–238.10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01928.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bhatti, Y., A. L. Olsen and L. H. Pedersen (2011) “Administrative Professionals and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Citizen Service Centres,” Public Administration, 89(2):577–594.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01882.xSearch in Google Scholar

Borins, S. (2001) “Public Management Innovation: Toward a Global Perspective,” The American Review of Public Administration, 31(1):5–21.10.1177/02750740122064802Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, D. P. and G. A. Krause (2012) “Reputation and Public Administration,” Public Administration Review, 72(1):26–32.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.xSearch in Google Scholar

Charbonneau, É. and F. Bellavance (2015) “Performance Management in a Benchmarking Regime: Quebec’s Municipal Management Indicators,” Canadian Public Administration, 58(1):110–137.10.1111/capa.12098Search in Google Scholar

Choi, T. and S. M. Chandler (2015) “Exploration, Exploitation, and Public Sector Innovation: An Organizational Learning Perspective for the Public Sector,” Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2):139–151.10.1080/23303131.2015.1011762Search in Google Scholar

Cleves, M., W. Gould, R. G. Gutierrez and Y. V. Marchenko (2010) An Introduction to Survival Analysis using Stata (3rd ed.) College Station: Stata Press: StataCorp LP.Search in Google Scholar

Cox, D. R. (1972) “Regression Models and Life-Tables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 34(2):187–220.10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37Search in Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and J. G. March (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell (1983) “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, 48(2):147–160.10.2307/j.ctv1f886rp.7Search in Google Scholar

Elkink, J. A. (2013) “Spatial, Temporal and Spatio-Temporal Clustering of Democracy and Autocracy,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 29. SSRN-id2299194.Search in Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1954) “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes,” Human Relations, 7(2):117–140.10.1177/001872675400700202Search in Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. and D. G. Goldstein (1996) “Reasoning the Fast and Frugal Way: Models of Bounded Rationality,” Psychological Review, 103(4):650–669.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744282.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Gleditsch, K. S. and M. D. Ward (2006) “Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization,” International Organization, 60(4):911–933.10.1017/S0020818306060309Search in Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. (1978) “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior,” American Journal of Sociology, 83(6):1420–1443.10.1086/226707Search in Google Scholar

Gray, V. (1973) “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study,” The American Political Science Review, 67(4):1174–1185.10.2307/1956539Search in Google Scholar

Hartley, J. and M. Allison (2002) “Good, Better, Best? Inter-Organizational Learning in a Network of Local Authorities,” Public Management Review, 4(1):101–118.10.1080/14616670110117332Search in Google Scholar

Hartley, J. and J. Benington (2006) “Copy and Paste, or Graft and Transplant? Knowledge Sharing Through Inter-Organizational Networks,” Public Money & Management, 26(2):101–108.10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00508.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hatry, H. P. (2015) “Tracking the Quality of Services.” In: (Perry, J. L. and R. K. Christensen, eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (3rd ed.). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 312–332.Search in Google Scholar

Hood, C. (2010) The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400836819Search in Google Scholar

Hosmer, D. W., S. Lemeshow and S. May (2008) Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modelling of Time-to-Event Data (2nd ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470258019Search in Google Scholar

Huang, K. (2014) “Knowledge Sharing in a Third-Party-Governed Health and Human Services Network,” Public Administration Review, 74(5):587–598.10.1111/puar.12222Search in Google Scholar

James, O. and P. John (2007) “Public Management at the Ballot Box: Performance Information and Electoral Support for Incumbent English Local Governments,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4):567–580.10.1093/jopart/mul020Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, T. and S. Siverbo (2009) “Explaining the Utilization of Relative Performance Evaluation in Local Government: A Multi-Theoretical Study using Data from Sweden,” Financial Accountability & Management, 25(2):197–224.10.1111/j.1468-0408.2009.00474.xSearch in Google Scholar

Jones, B. D. (2003) “Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4):395–412.10.1093/jopart/mug028Search in Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, S. and T. Jäkel (2013) “Competing, Collaborating or Controlling? Comparing Benchmarking in European Local Government,” Public Money & Management, 33(4):269–276.10.1080/09540962.2013.799815Search in Google Scholar

Laakso, M. and R. Taagepera (1979) “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe,” Comparative Political Studies, 12(1):3–27.10.1177/001041407901200101Search in Google Scholar

Lavertu, S. and D. P. Moynihan (2013) “The Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models: A Description of the Method and an Application to the Study of Performance Management Implementation,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2):333–360.10.1093/jopart/mus049Search in Google Scholar

Lundin, M., P. Öberg and C. Josefsson (2015) “Learning from Success: Are Successful Governments Role Models?” Public Administration, 93(3):733–752.10.1111/padm.12162Search in Google Scholar

March, J. G. (1991) “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science, 2(1):71–87.10.1287/orsc.2.1.71Search in Google Scholar

March, J. G. and H. A. Simon (1993 [1958]) Organizations (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, S., J. Downe, C. Grace and S. Nutley (2010) “Validity, Utilization and Evidence-Based Policy: The Development and Impact of Performance Improvement Regimes in Local Public Services,” Evaluation, 16(1):31–42.10.1177/1356389009350119Search in Google Scholar

Meier, K. J., N. Favero and L. Zhu (2015) “Performance Gaps and Managerial Decisions: A Bayesian Decision Theory of Managerial Action,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4):1221–1246.10.1093/jopart/muu054Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, C. (1991) “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes,” Academy of Management Review, 16(1):145–179.10.2307/258610Search in Google Scholar

Przeworski, A. and F. Limongi (1997) “Modernization: Theories and Facts,” World Politics, 49(2):155–183.10.1353/wp.1997.0004Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, E. M. (1962) Diffusion of Innovations (1 ed.). New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Salge, T. O. (2011) “A Behavioral Model of Innovative Search: Evidence from Public Hospital Services,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1):181–210.10.1093/jopart/muq017Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1997 [1945]) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.10.1097/00000446-195002000-00071Search in Google Scholar

Teodoro, M. P. (2011) Bureaucratic Ambition: Careers, Motives, and the Innovative Administrator. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831456Search in Google Scholar

Van Dooren, W., G. Bouckaert and J. Halligan (2010) Performance Management in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203030806Search in Google Scholar

Van den Bulte, C. and Gary L. Lilien (2001) “Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort,” American Journal of Sociology, 106(5):1409–1435.10.1086/320819Search in Google Scholar

Volden, C., M. M. Ting and D. P. Carpenter (2008) “A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion,” American Political Science Review, 102(3):319–332.10.1017/S0003055408080271Search in Google Scholar

Walker, J. L. (1969) “The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States,” American Political Science Review, 63(3):880–899.10.2307/j.ctv1mjqv11.16Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, X. and Y. Zhang (2015) “Political Mobility and Dynamic Diffusion of Innovation: The Spread of Municipal Pro-Business Administrative Reform in China,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3):535–551.10.1093/jopart/muv025Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-04-15
Published in Print: 2019-06-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/spp-2018-0004/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button