What does a receptive bilingual understand? Evidence from Polish as a heritage language in Germany

Tanja Anstatt; Ursula Mikić

doi:10.1515/slaw-2022-0017

Article

What does a receptive bilingual understand? Evidence from Polish as a heritage language in Germany

Tanja Anstatt and Ursula Mikić

Published/Copyright: August 5, 2022

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information

From the journal Zeitschrift für Slawistik Volume 67 Issue 3

Summary

Our study explores the field of receptive bilingualism, a highly common phenomenon with respect to heritage languages—one that, despite its commonness, has been analyzed by few studies. We collected data from 10 receptive bilinguals of Polish as a heritage language in Germany, including data from interviews regarding language biographies, a battery of tests on language comprehension skills, and a single-word production task. The main focus of our study was the analysis of the receptive abilities of our 10 participants, with a specific emphasis on their level of listening comprehension of spoken text. We conducted an explorative correlation analysis with respect to the interrelation of listening comprehension with other parameters, such as single-word comprehension, sentence comprehension, single-word production, and the language choice of the participants’ parents. The results indicate that all participants coped well with spoken texts up to level B1 of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). There was great variance in performance at levels B2 and C1, with some of the participants still performing very well. Their performance at levels B2 and C1 strongly correlated with the number of direct address instances in Polish by the parents during childhood and with single-word comprehension. Furthermore, the word production task generated the lowest outcomes of all tests, thus revealing a wide gap between receptive and productive abilities. Interestingly, the results of the word production task did not correlate with those pertaining to the listening comprehension of texts at levels B2 and C1. This finding underscores the fact that productive skills do not constitute a valid indicator of receptive abilities. In summary, our results demonstrate the special quality of receptive bilingualism and the need to avoid underestimating this specific status (e. g., in language classes).

Keywords: Receptive Bilingualism; Language Comprehension; Heritage Languages; Polish

Acknowledgment

We would like to sincerely thank all those who agreed to take part in the study and shared with us details on their language biography and language knowledge.

References

Aitchison, Jean. 1994. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford & Cambridge: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Ammerlaan, Ton. 1996. “You get a bit wobbly ...” Exploring bilingual lexical retrieval processes in the context of first language attrition. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit. Search in Google Scholar

Anstatt, Tanja. 2011. Sprachattrition: Abbau der Erstsprache bei russisch-deutschen Jugendlichen. In Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 67, 7–31.Search in Google Scholar

Anstatt, Tanja and Oxana Rubcov. 2012. Gemischter Input – einsprachiger Output? Familiensprache und Entwicklung der Sprachtrennung bei bilingualen Kleinkindern. In Harald Weydt, Konstanze Jungbluth and Barbara Jańczak (eds.), Mehrsprachigkeit aus deutscher Perspektive, 73–94. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Anstatt, Tanja. 2016. Subjektive Frequenz als Forschungsmethode. In Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 77, 7–35.Search in Google Scholar

Anstatt, Tanja. 2018. Input ohne Output: Rezeptiver Bilingualismus und sein Potenzial. In Grit Mehlhorn and Bernhard Brehmer (eds.), Potenziale von Herkunftssprachen: Sprachliche und außersprachliche Einflussfaktoren (= Reihe “Forum Sprachlehrforschung”), 15–38. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Search in Google Scholar

Au, Terry K., Janet S. Oh, Leah M. Knightly, Sun-Ah Jun and Laura F. Romo. 2008. Salvaging a childhood language. In Journal of Memory and Language 58 (4). 998–1011.10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Au, Terry K., Leah M. Knightly, Sun-Ah Jun, Janet S. Oh. 2002. Overhearing a language during childhood. In Psychological Science 13 (3). 238–243. 10.1111/1467-9280.00444Search in Google Scholar

Balota, David A., Maura Pilotti and Michael J. Cortese,. 2001. Subjective frequency estimates for 2.938 monosyllabic words. In Memory & Cognition 29, 639–647.10.3758/BF03200465Search in Google Scholar

Carreira, Maria, Linda Jensen and Olga Kagan. 2011. The Results of the National Heritage Language Survey: Implications for Teaching, Curriculum Design, and Professional Development. In Foreign Language Annals 44 (1), 40–64.10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01118.xSearch in Google Scholar

De Houwer, Annick. 2007. Parental input patterns and children’s bilingual use. In Applied Psycholinguistics 283, 411–424. 10.1017/S0142716407070221Search in Google Scholar

De Houwer, Annick. 2020. Why do so many children who hear two languages speak just a single language? In Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 25 (1), 7–26.Search in Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. 1981. Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9781512815580Search in Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. 1982. Defining the speech community to include its working margins. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities, 25–33. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni, Davide Crepaldi, Antje S. Meyer, Boris New, Christos Pliatsikas, Eva Smolka and Marc Brysbaert. 2018. MultiPic: A standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages. In Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (4), 808–816. 10.1080/17470218.2017.1310261Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, John. 2013. Bilingualism and Multilingualism: Some Central Concepts. In Tej K. Bhatia and William C. Ritchie 2013 (eds.) (2^nd edition), Handbook of bilingualism, 5–25. Malden (MA): Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118332382.ch1Search in Google Scholar

Fishman, Joshua. 2001. Can Threatened Languages be Saved? Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853597060Search in Google Scholar

Gagarina, Natalia, Annegret Klassert and Nathalie Topaj. 2010. Sprachstandstest Russisch für mehrsprachige Kinder. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics 54.10.21248/zaspil.54.2010.402Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Todd A., Elizabeth D. Peña, and Lisa M. Bedore. 2014 a. The receptive-expressive gap in bilingual children with and without primary language impairment. In American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 23, 655–667. 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-12-0119Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Todd A., Elizabeth D. Peña, and Lisa M. Bedore. 2014 b. The relation between language experience and receptive-expressive semantic gaps in bilingual children. In International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 17. 90–110. 10.1080/13670050.2012.743960Search in Google Scholar

Gollan, Tamar H., Timothy J. Slattery, Diane Goldenberg, Eva Van Assche, Wouter Duyck and Keith Rayner. 2011. Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. In Journal of experimental psychology, General 140 (2), 186–209. 10.1037/a0022256Search in Google Scholar

Hendriks, Petra and Charlotte Koster. 2010. Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition. In Lingua 120, 1887–1897.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Bonnie C. and Michael T. Putnam. 2020. Mental representations in receptive multilingual grammars. In Bonnie C. Holmes and Michael T. Putnam (eds.), [Special issue]. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10 (3), 309–314.10.1075/lab.00029.intSearch in Google Scholar

Kamada, Laurel D. 1999. Reduced bilingual input in later born children: Receptive bilingual acquisition. Hirosaki: Hirosaki University.Search in Google Scholar

Keenan, Janice M. and Brian MacWhinney. 1987. Understanding the relationship between comprehension and production. In Hans W. Dechert and Manfred Raupach (eds.), Psycholinguistic models of production, 149–155. Westport: Ablex. Search in Google Scholar

Köpke, Barbara and Monika S. Schmid. 2004. Language attrition: The next phase. In Monika S. Schmid (ed.), First language attrition, 1–43. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.28Search in Google Scholar

Kupisch, Tanja and Rothman, Jason. 2018. Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. In International Journal of Bilingualism 22, 564–582.10.1177/1367006916654355Search in Google Scholar

Litcofsky, Kaitlyn A., Darren Tanner and Janet G. van Hell. 2016. Effects of language experience, use, and cognitive functioning on bilingual word production and comprehension. In International Journal of Bilingualism 20 (6), 666–683. 10.1177/1367006915579737Search in Google Scholar

Luislampe, Anke. 2018. Die Entwicklung der Herkunftssprache bei polnisch-deutsch Bilingualen im mittleren Erwachsenenalter. Bochum: Ruhr-University of Bochum unpublished Master’s thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Mandera, Paweł, Emmanuel Keuleers, Zofia Wodniecka and Marc Brysbaert. 2014. Subtlex-pl: subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. In Behavioral Research Methods 47. 471–483. 10.3758/s13428-014-0489-4Search in Google Scholar

Montrul, Silvina. 2016. The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139030502Search in Google Scholar

Oh, Janet S., Sun-Ah Jun, Leah M. Knightly and Terry K. Au. 2003. Holding on to childhood language memory. In Cognition 86, B53–B64.10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00175-0Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Tenaha, Zuowei Wang and John Sabatini. 2019. How much knowledge is too little? When a lack of knowledge becomes a barrier to comprehension. In Psychological Science 30(9), 1344–1351. 10.1177/0956797619862276Search in Google Scholar

Państwowa Komisja ds. Poświadczania Znajomości Języka Polskiego jako Obcego. N.y. Egzaminy certyfikatowe z języka polskiego jako obcego – przykładowe testy.http://certyfikatpolski.pl (accessed 24 May 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria. 2008. Relative clauses in heritage Russian: Fossilization or divergent grammar? In Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn and Christina Y. Bethin (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, 333–358. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria. 2016. Structure vs. use in heritage language. In Linguistics Vanguard 2 (1), 1–14. 10.1515/lingvan-2015-0036Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria 2020 [2018]. Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria and Olga Kagan. 2007. Heritage languages: In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. In Language and Linguistics Compass 1/5, 368–395.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00022.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rehbein, Jochen, Jan D. ten Thije and Anna Verschik. 2012. Lingua receptiva (LaRa). Remarks on the quintessence of receptive multilingualism. In ten Thije, Jan D., Jochen Rehbein & Anna Verschik (eds.), 2012. Receptive multilingualism. [Special issue]. The International Journal of Bilingualism 16 (3), 248–264.10.1177/1367006911426466Search in Google Scholar

Rothman, Jason. 2009. Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. In International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2), 155–163.10.1177/1367006909339814Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Monika and Barbara Köpke. 2009. L1 Attrition and the mental lexicon. In Aneta Pavlenko (ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches, 209–237. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691262-011Search in Google Scholar

Sherkina-Lieber, Marina. 2010. Comprehension of functional morphemes by Labrador Inuttitut receptive bilinguals. In Katie Franich, Kate M. Iserman and Lauren L. Keil (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2), 351–362. Sommerville: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sherkina-Lieber, Marina. 2011. Comprehension of Labrador Inuttitut functional morphology by receptive bilinguals. Toronto: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.Search in Google Scholar

Sherkina-Lieber, Marina. 2015. Tense, aspect, and agreement in heritage Labrador Inuttitut: Do receptive bilinguals understand functional morphology? In Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5 (1), 30–61.10.1075/lab.5.1.02sheSearch in Google Scholar

Sherkina-Lieber, Marina. 2020. A classification of receptive bilinguals: Why we need to distinguish them, and what they have in common. In Holmes, Bonnie C., Michael T. Putnam (eds.), [Special issue]. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10 (3), 412–440.10.1075/lab.17080.sheSearch in Google Scholar

Sherkina-Lieber, Marina, Ana T. Perez-Leroux and Alana Johns. 2011. Grammar without speech production: The case of Labrador Inuttitut heritage receptive bilinguals. In Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14 (3), 301–317.10.1017/S1366728910000210Search in Google Scholar

Steiner, Naomi and Susan L. Hayes. 2009. 7 steps to raising a bilingual child. New York: AMACOM, American Management Association.Search in Google Scholar

ten Thije, Jan D., Jochen Rehbein and Anna Verschik (eds.). 2012. Receptive multilingualism. [Special issue]. The International Journal of Bilingualism 16 (3).10.1177/1367006911426468Search in Google Scholar

Tokowicz, Natasha and Charles A. Perfetti. 2005. Introduction to part II: Comprehension. In Kroll, Judith F. & Annette M. B. de Groot (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism. Psycholinguistic Approaches, 173–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Waring, Robert. 1997. A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of some second language learners. In Immaculata: The Occasional Papers at Notre Dame Seishin University 1, 53–68. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-08-05

Published in Print: 2022-08-31

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2022-0017

Keywords for this article

Receptive Bilingualism; Language Comprehension; Heritage Languages; Polish