Abstract
Money is a symbol. Beginning with this simple notion, we have completed a qualitative study of how money exists in people’s everyday lives and how it is used symbolically. A review of the financial, economic, psychological, and semiotic literature shows that even though money is written and talked about exhaustively, little symbol theory appears in economic writing, and we rarely found money mentioned in semiotic texts. We used a qualitative, phenomenological approach to identify critical thematic elements and underlying structures of participants’ experience. We also incorporated an accepted symbol-structure template in our analysis of the functions, emotions, actions, and reactions in the transactions our participants described. Participants refer to money both as wealth in the abstract and as concrete amounts about to be used. Our analysis of money in the abstract describes a structure of experience involving belonging, privacy and secrecy, unequal distribution, quantitative uncertainty, reflections of life history, and values. Our analysis of money in the concrete reveals a symbolic intention and a variety of “Others” engaged in the symbolic action.
References
Ariely, Dan. 2008. Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Search in Google Scholar
Becker, Ernest. 1975. Escape from evil. New York, NY: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chan-Brown, Karl, Anne Douglass, Steen Halling, Julia Keller & Marie McNabb. 2016. What is money? A qualitative study of money as experienced. The Humanistic Psychologist 44(2). 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000024.Search in Google Scholar
Dyer, Alan W. 1989. Making semiotic sense of money as a medium of exchange. Journal of Economic Issues 23(2). 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1989.11504916.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1986. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall. 2009. The ascent of money: A financial history of the world. New York, NY: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1973. Symbols, public and private. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gleeson-White, Jane. 2011. Double entry: How the merchants of Venice created modern finance. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Halling, Steen, Michael Leifer & Jan O. Rowe. 2006. Emergence of the dialogal approach: Forgiving another. In Constance T. Fischer (ed.), Qualitative research methods for psychology, 247–277. New York, NY: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012088470-4/50012-0Search in Google Scholar
Halling, Steen & Michael Leifer. 1991. The theory and practice of dialogal research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 22(1). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916291x00019.Search in Google Scholar
Hammond, Mark. 2001. A Heideggerian phenomenological investigation of money (Problems in Contemporary Philosophy 51). Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Search in Google Scholar
King, Mervyn. 2016. The end of alchemy: Money, banking, and the future of the global economy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar
Langer, Susanne K. 1962. Philosophical sketches. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins Press.Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, Ryan Peter. 2012. Modeling money. The Library of Economics and Liberty. http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2012/Murphymoney.html (accessed 13 July 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Perinbanayagam, Robert. 2011. The coinage of the self: Money, signs, and the social self. In Norman K. Denzin (ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction, vol. 36, 107–136. Bingley: Emerald Group.10.1108/S0163-2396(2011)0000036007Search in Google Scholar
Wennerlind, Carl. 2001. Money talks, but what is it saying? Semiotics of money and social control. Journal of Economic Issues 35(3). 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506390.Search in Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana. 1994. The social meaning of money. New York, NY: Basic.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Re charged emblems: Hawthorne and semiotic metamorphics
- The spectrum of subjectal forms: Towards an Integral Semiotics
- Peirce, Aristotle, metaphor – and comments to Factor
- Charles Peirce and firstness: The category of origins
- Image and word as forms of iconic depiction
- Embodied ekphrasis of experience: Bodily rhetoric in mediating affect in interaction
- Semeiotic time
- “In my head, I have a cleaning lady:” Symbol form and symbolic intention in the everyday use of money
- The form of the traditional bamboo house in the Makassar culture: A cultural semiotic study
- Garroni, the late Peirce, and the issue of creativity
- Collocational semiosis in the academic discourse of the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): The case of AFRICA
- Book Review
- In the footsteps of the semiotic school of Moscow-Tartu / Tartu-Moscow: Evaluations and perspectives
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Re charged emblems: Hawthorne and semiotic metamorphics
- The spectrum of subjectal forms: Towards an Integral Semiotics
- Peirce, Aristotle, metaphor – and comments to Factor
- Charles Peirce and firstness: The category of origins
- Image and word as forms of iconic depiction
- Embodied ekphrasis of experience: Bodily rhetoric in mediating affect in interaction
- Semeiotic time
- “In my head, I have a cleaning lady:” Symbol form and symbolic intention in the everyday use of money
- The form of the traditional bamboo house in the Makassar culture: A cultural semiotic study
- Garroni, the late Peirce, and the issue of creativity
- Collocational semiosis in the academic discourse of the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): The case of AFRICA
- Book Review
- In the footsteps of the semiotic school of Moscow-Tartu / Tartu-Moscow: Evaluations and perspectives