Home Nitrogen cycle module for INM RAS climate model
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Nitrogen cycle module for INM RAS climate model

  • Alexey Yu. Chernenkov EMAIL logo , Evgeny M. Volodin and Victor M. Stepanenko
Published/Copyright: August 7, 2024

Abstract

Nitrogen is one of the most abundant chemical elements on the Earth and plays an important role in global environmental change. Leading Earth system models include coupled carbon and nitrogen cycle modules of varying complexity, but the INM RAS climate model family has not yet included an explicit N-cycle description. This paper presents a parameterization of the terrestrial N-cycle based on a simplification of the JULES-CN model, adapted for coupled use with the INM-CM land C-cycle module. Numerical simulations were carried out with a standalone carbon cycle model with nitrogen feedback disabled and enabled versions for the period 1850–2100. The simulated global pools show good agreement with results of other models with an implemented N-cycle. Taking into account the N-limitation of the C-cycle, the modelled dynamics of total carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems from 1850 to the mid-20th century is specified.

MSC 2010: 35Q86; 65Z05; 68U20; 86A10; 92F99

Funding statement: The research was carried out at the Marchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The N-cycle parametrization development and its implementation into the INM-CM terrestrial carbon module (Section 1) are supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project 20-17-00190. Validation of the N-cycle parametrization and numerical experiments with the standalone INM-CM land carbon model (Sections 2 and 3) are funded by the Russian Federation research and technical development program in ecological strategy and climate change through grant FFMG-2023-0001 ‘Development of an extended version of the INM RAS Earth system model within a new computational framework’.

Acknowledgment

Numerical experiments with the INM-CM were performed using the HPC system of the Marchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

References

[1] A. Asaadi and V. K. Arora, Implementation of nitrogen cycle in the CLASSIC land model. Biogeosciences 18 (2021), No. 2, 669–706.10.5194/bg-18-669-2021Search in Google Scholar

[2] G. B. Bonan, Land–atmosphere interactions for climate system models: coupling biophysical, biogeochemical and ecosystem dynamical processes. Remote Sensing of Environment 51 (1995), No. 1, 57–73.10.1016/0034-4257(94)00065-USearch in Google Scholar

[3] D. B. Clark et al., The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics. Geoscientific Model Development 4 (2011), No. 3, 701–722.10.5194/gmd-4-701-2011Search in Google Scholar

[4] C. C. Cleveland et al., Global patterns of terrestrial biological nitrogen (N2) fixation in natural ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 13 (1999), No. 2, 623–645.10.1029/1999GB900014Search in Google Scholar

[5] T. Davies-Barnard et al., Nitrogen cycling in CMIP6 land surface models: progress and limitations. Biogeosciences 17 (2020), No. 20, 5129–5148.10.5194/bg-17-5129-2020Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. L. Dorman and P. J. Sellers, A global climatology of albedo, roughness length and stomatal resistance for atmospheric general circulation models as represented by the simple biosphere model (SiB). Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 28 (1983), No. 9, 833–855.10.1175/1520-0450(1989)028<0833:AGCOAR>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[7] E. Du et al., Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. Nat. Geosci. 13 (2020), No. 3, 221–226.10.1038/s41561-019-0530-4Search in Google Scholar

[8] V. Eyring et al., Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development 9 (2016), No. 5, 1937–1958.10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016Search in Google Scholar

[9] G. C. Hurtt et al., Harmonization of global land use change and management for the period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Development 13 (2020), 5425–5464.10.5194/gmd-13-5425-2020Search in Google Scholar

[10] D. M. Lawrence et al., The community land model version 5: Description of new features, benchmarking, and impact of forcing uncertainty. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11 (2019), No. 12, 4245–4287.Search in Google Scholar

[11] V. P. Masson-Delmotte, A. Zhai, S. L. Pirani, C. Connors, S. Péan, N. Berger, Y. Caud, L. Chen, M. I. Goldfarb, M. Gomis, K. Huang, E. Leitzell, J. B. R. Lonnoy, T. K. Matthews, T. Maycock, O. Waterfield, R. Yu Yelekçi, and B. Zhou (eds.). IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–New York, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[12] B. C. O’Neill et al., The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geoscientific Model Development 9 (2016), No. 9, 3461–3482.10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Q. Thomas, G. B. Bonan and C. L. Goodale, Insights into mechanisms governing forest carbon response to nitrogen deposition: a model-data comparison using observed responses to nitrogen addition. Biogeosciences 10 (2013), No. 6, 3869–3887.10.5194/bg-10-3869-2013Search in Google Scholar

[14] E. M. Volodin and V. N. Lykosov, Parameterization of heat and moisture transfer in the soil-vegetation system for use in atmospheric general circulation models: 1. Formulation and simulations based on local observational data. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 34 (1998), No. 4, 405–416.Search in Google Scholar

[15] E. M. Volodin, Atmosphere–ocean general circulation model with the carbon cycle. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 43 (2007), No. 3, 266–280.10.1134/S0001433807030024Search in Google Scholar

[16] E. M. Volodin et al., Simulation of the modern climate using the INM-CM48 climate model. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Mod. 33 (2018), No. 6, 367–374.10.1515/rnam-2018-0032Search in Google Scholar

[17] E. M. Volodin, Simulation of present-day climate with the INMCM60 model. Izvestiya. Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics 59 (2023), No. 1, 16–22.10.1134/S0001433823010139Search in Google Scholar

[18] W. von Bloh et al., Implementing the nitrogen cycle into the dynamic global vegetation, hydrology, and crop growth model LPJmL (version 5.0). Geoscientific Model Development 11 (2018), 2789–2812.10.5194/gmd-11-2789-2018Search in Google Scholar

[19] M. N. Weintraub and J. P. Schimel, Nitrogen cycling and the spread of shrubs control changes in the carbon balance of Arctic tundra ecosystems. BioScience 55 (2005), No. 5, 408–415.10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0408:NCATSO]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. J. Wiltshire et al., JULES-CN: a coupled terrestrial carbon–nitrogen scheme (JULES vn5.1). Geoscientific Model Development 14 (2021), No. 4, 2161–2186.10.5194/gmd-14-2161-2021Search in Google Scholar

[21] Xu-Ri and I. C. Prentice, Terrestrial nitrogen cycle simulation with a dynamic global vegetation model. Glob. Change Biol. 14 (2008), 1745–1764.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01625.xSearch in Google Scholar

[22] S. Zaehle, A. D. Friend, P. Friedlingstein, F. Dentener, P. Peylin, M. Schulz, Carbon and nitrogen cycle dynamics in the O-CN land surface model: 2. Role of the nitrogen cycle in the historical terrestrial carbon balance. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 24 (2010), No. 1, GB1006.10.1029/2009GB003522Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-05-22
Accepted: 2024-05-30
Published Online: 2024-08-07
Published in Print: 2024-08-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/rnam-2024-0018/html
Scroll to top button