Abstract
It is always an appropriate time to reevaluate, reexamine, and question the optimal scope and shape of antitrust institutions. In this article we ask whether the complex current distribution of competition functions in the U.S. can be improved by some reorganization or other reform. We answer in the affirmative and propose a number of improvements – perhaps the most significant being consolidating the competition functions of the FTC into the Antitrust Division and stripping the FCC of authority independently to review mergers, as it did in view of the similarly poor performance of the DOT when reviewing airline mergers. Our more general proposal with the authority of sectoral regulators over competition should not be overlooked, however; it would do much good with little or no downside.
References
Agarwal, Asheesh. 2022. “The FTC’s Recent Moves Could Cost it in the Supreme Court.” Yale Journal on Regulation. www.yalejreg.com/nc/ftc-recent-moves (accessed October 23, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
American Antitrust Institute (AAI). 2020. “AAI Says New Vertical Merger Guidelines “Fall Short,” Suggests Next Administration Start Over.” www.antitrustinstitute.org/aai-says-new-vertical-merger-guidelines-fall-short-suggests-next-administration-start-over (accessed June 30, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
American Bar Assoc. (ABA), Section of Antitrust Law. 2012. The Merger Review Process: A Step-by-Step Guide to U.S. and Foreign Merger Review, 4th ed, 26. Chicago, IL: ABA, Section of Antitrust Law.Search in Google Scholar
Antitrust Modernization Commission (AMC Report). 2007. “AMC Report and Recommendations.” 151. http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/amc/report_recommendation/amc_final_report.pdf (accessed April, 2007).Search in Google Scholar
Auerbach, Stuart. 1984. “Jury Probe of Airlines Called off.” Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1984/11/20/jury-probe-of-airlines-called-off/e6738a3c-f3b5-4066-bb7c-26b4ef3377d0 (accessed November 20, 1984).Search in Google Scholar
Bartz, Diane, and Doina Chiacu. 2019. “44 States Sue Drug Maker Teva, Alleging Price Fixing Scheme with 19 Other Firms.” Insulation Journal. www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2019/05/13/526175.htm (accessed May 13, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Emily. 2022. “Biden Antitrust Adviser Tim Wu to Leave White House.” Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-12-30/biden-antitrust-adviser-tim-wu-to-leave-white-house (accessed December 30, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Breit, William, and Kenneth G. Elzinga. 1974. “Antitrust Enforcement and Economic Efficiency: The Uneasy Case for Treble Damages.” The Journal of Law and Economics 17: 329. https://doi.org/10.1086/466795.Search in Google Scholar
Calkins, Stephen. 2003. “Perspectives on State and Federal Antitrust Enforcement.” Duke Law Journal 53: 673.Search in Google Scholar
Carson, Dylan. 2020. “Putting the Tunney in Tunney Act: Will Evidentiary Hearings Become the Main Event After CVS/Aetna.” Antitrust Source 20: 1–2.Search in Google Scholar
Chopra, Rohit, and Lina Khan. 2020. “The Case for “Unfair Methods of Competition” Rulemaking.” University of Chicago Law Review 87: 357.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Donald S. 2015. “Statement of Enforcement Principles Regarding “Unfair Methods of Competition” Under Section 5 of the FTC Act.” Federal Trade Commission. www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/735201/150813section5enforcement.pdf (accessed August 13, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Don. 2020. “In Victory for Qualcomm, Appeals Court Throw Out Antitrust Ruling.” New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/technology/qualcomm-antitrust-appeal-ruling.html (accessed August 11, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4: 386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626876.Search in Google Scholar
Coll, Steve. 1988. Deal of the Century: The Breakup of AT&T. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar
Congressional Research Service. 2022. “Cost-Benefit Analysis in Federal Agency Rulemaking.” http://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12058 (accessed March 8, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Connor, John M. 2012. “Private Recoveries in International Cartel Cases Worldwide: What Do the Data Show?” Working Paper No. 12–03, 11. American Antitrust Institute. www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/WorkingPaperNo12-03.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Connor, John M., and Robert H. Lande. 2012. “Cartels as Rational Business Strategy: Crime Pays.” Cardozo Law Review 34: 427.Search in Google Scholar
Connor, John M., and Robert H. Lande. 2015. “Not Treble Damages: Cartel Recoveries are Mostly Less than Single Damages.” Iowa Law Review 100: 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Constantine, Lloyd. 1990. “Antitrust Federalism.” Washburn Law Journal 29: 163.Search in Google Scholar
Cowie, Mike, and James Fishkin. 2020. “The FTC in a Biden Administration Could Remain Republican Controlled for More than 2 Years.” JD Supra. www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-ftc-in-a-biden-administration-could-67484 (accessed October 4, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Crane, Daniel A. 2011. The Institutional Structure of Antitrust Enforcement. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372656.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Crane, Daniel A. 2015. “Debunking Humphrey’s Executor.” George Washington Law Review 86: 1835.10.2139/ssrn.2569273Search in Google Scholar
Crane, Daniel A. 2019. “Toward a Realistic Comparative Assessment of Private Antitrust Enforcement.” In Reconciling Efficiency and Equity: A Global Challenge for Competition Policy, edited by Damien Gerard, and Ioannis Lianos. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108628105.019Search in Google Scholar
CrookerJrJohn H. 1973. “Airline Mergers in the 1970s.” The Journal of Air Law and Commerce 39: 143.Search in Google Scholar
Daish, John B. 1914. “The Federal Trade Commission.” The Yale Law Journal 24: 43. https://doi.org/10.2307/785953.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, Joshua P., and Robert H. Lande. 2013. “Towards an Empirical and Theoretical Assessment of Private Antitrust Enforcement.” Seattle University Law Review 36: 1269.Search in Google Scholar
Delrahim, Makan. 2018. Remarks at the 19th Annual Berkeley-Stanford Advanced Patent Law Institute: “Telegraph Road”: Incentivizing Innovation at the Intersection of Patent and Antitrust Law, Makan Delrahim. Assistant Att’y General, Antitrust Div., U.S. DOJ. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/file/1117686/dl (accessed December 7, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Dempsey, Paul Stephen. 1979. “The Rise and Fall of the Civil Aeronautics Board—Opening Wide the Floodgates of Entry.” Transport en Logistiek 11: 91.Search in Google Scholar
Dempsey, Paul Stephen. 1987. “Antitrust Law and Policy in Transportation: Monopoly Is the Name of the Game.” Georgia Law Review 21: 505.Search in Google Scholar
Dorsey, Elyse, Jan Rybnicek, and Joshua D. Wright. 2018. “Hipster Antitrust Meets Public Choice Economics: The Consumer Welfare Standard, Rule of Law, and Rent-Seeking.” Competition Policy International Antitrust Chronicle 1: 21–33.Search in Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. 1983. “Antitrust and the Economics of Federalism.” The Journal of Law and Economics 26: 23.10.1086/467024Search in Google Scholar
Edwards, Lindsey M., Douglas H. Ginsburg, and Joshua D. Wright. 2020. “Section 2 Mangled: FTC V. Qualcomm on the Duty to Deal, Price Squeezes, and Exclusive Dealing.” Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 8: 335. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnz034.Search in Google Scholar
Fauver, Jennifer Cascone. 2022. “Putting a Number on the Debate: An Empirical Assessment of U.S. Federal Antitrust Enforcement by State Attorneys General.” www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4064150 (accessed March 22, 2022).10.2139/ssrn.4064150Search in Google Scholar
Fauver, Jennifer Cascone. Forthcoming. “The Danger of Consent: An Empirical Tale of Settlements by States Attorneys General to Resolve Alleged Violations of Federal Antitrust Laws.” (unpublished manuscript) (on file with author).Search in Google Scholar
Forden, Sara, and David McLaughlin. 2022. “Biden’s New Antitrust Cop Threatens to Slam Brakes on Mergers.” Bloomberg. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-01/biden-s-new-antitrust-cop-threatens-to-slam-brakes-on-mergers (accessed April 1, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Gatens, Martin J. 2020. “Note, Five-To-Four: The Case for a Defensive Redesign of the CFPB.” Texas Law Review 98: 1115.Search in Google Scholar
Gilpin, Kenneth N. 2001. “Antitrust Challenge Stops United Merger with US Airways.” New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2001/07/28/business/antitrust-challenge-stops-united-merger-with-us-airways.html (accessed July 28, 2001).Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Douglas H. 1991. “Vertical Restraints: De Facto Legality Under the Rule of Reason.” Antitrust Law Journal 60: 67.Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Douglas H. 2023. “Wither the Consumer Welfare Standard?” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 46: 69.Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Douglas H., and Cecilia (Yixi) Cheng. 2020. “The Decline in U.S. Criminal Antitrust Cases: ACPERA and Leniency in an International Context.” In Albert A. Foer Liber Amicorum: A Consumer Voice in the Antitrust Arena, edited by Nicolas Charbit, and Sonia Ahmad, 125. New York, NY: Institute of Competition Law.10.2139/ssrn.3460091Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Douglas H., and Joshua D. Wright. 2013. “Antitrust Settlements: The Culture of Consent.” In William E. Kovacic: An Antitrust Tribute – Liber Amicorum, I, edited by Nicolas Charbit, Elisa Ramundo, Anna Chehtova, and Abigail Slater. New York: Institute of Competition Law.Search in Google Scholar
Gramm, Phil, and Jerry Ellig. 2020. “The Misguided Antitrust Attack on Big Tech.” Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-misguided-antitrust-attack-on-big-tech-11600125182 (accessed September 14, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Greve, Michael S. 2005. “Cartel Federalism? Antitrust Enforcement by State Attorneys General.” University of Chicago Law Review 72: 99.Search in Google Scholar
Hawk, Barry E. 1989. “Airline Deregulation after Ten Years: The Need for Vigorous Antitrust Enforcement and Intergovernmental Agreements.” Antitrust Bulletin 34: 267.Search in Google Scholar
Hazlett, Thomas W., and Joshua D. Wright. 2017. “The Effect of Regulation on Broadband Markets: Evaluating the Empirical Evidence in the FCC’s 2015 “Open Internet” Order.” Review of Industrial Organization 50: 487–507, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-016-9556-6.Search in Google Scholar
Hesse, Renata. 2016. Remarks at Fordham Competition Law Institute’s 43rd Annual Conference on International Antitrust Law and Policy, by Renata Hesse, Acting Assistant Att’y General. Antitrust Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/acting-assistant-attorney-general-renata-hesse-antitrust-division-delivers-remarks (accessed April 7, 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Hollman, Hugh, and William E. Kovacic. 2011. “The International Competition Network: Its Past, Current, and Future Role.” Minnesota Journal of International Law 20: 274.Search in Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Holmes. 1997. “The Path of Law.” Harvard Law Review 10: 991.10.2307/1342108Search in Google Scholar
Houck, Stephen D. 2009. “Transition Report: The State of State Antitrust Enforcement.”.Search in Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2011. “Quantification of Harm in Private Antitrust Actions in the United States.” Univ. of Iowa Legal Studies, Working Paper, 2011. www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1758751.10.2139/ssrn.1758751Search in Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2020. “FRAND and Antitrust.” Cornell Law Review 105: 1683.10.2139/ssrn.3420925Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Jennifer. 2020. “Antitrust Actions beyond the Federal Government: The Potential Impact of State and Private Litigation.” American Action Forum. www.americanactionforum.org/insight/antitrust-actions-beyond-the-federal-government-the-potential-impact-of-state-and-private-litigation (accessed December 18, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Hylton, Keith N. 2015. “The Economics of Class Actions and Class Action Waivers.” Supreme Court Economic Review 23: 305. https://doi.org/10.1086/686482.Search in Google Scholar
Jablon, Robert A., Mark S. Hegedus, and Sean M. Flynn. 2005. “Dispelling Myths: A Real World Perspective on Trinko.” Antitrust Bulletin 50: 589.Search in Google Scholar
Jurata, Jay, and Emily Luken. 2019. “Whistling in the Wind? DOJ’s Unusual Statement of Interest in FTC v. Qualcomm Case Highlights Disparity between U.S. Antitrust Agencies on FRAND, SEPs, & Competition Law.” Website Blogs: Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe. www.blogs.orrick.com/antitrust/tag/seps/ (accessed May 14, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Kang, Cecilia. 2021. “A Leading Critic of Big Tech Will Join the White House.” New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2021/03/05/technology/tim-wu-white-house.html (accessed March 5, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Kendall, Brent, and Jeffrey Sparshott. 2015. “FTC Issues Guidelines on Powers to Police Unfair Competition.” Wall Street Journal. www.wsj.com/articles/ftc-issues-guidelines-on-powers-to-police-unfair-competition-1439483039 (accessed August 13, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Koenig, Bryan. 2021. “FTC Rescinds Vertical Merger Guidelines; DOJ Might Follow.” LAW360. https://www.law360.com/articles/1421818/ftc-rescinds-vertical-merger-guidelines-doj-might-follow (accessed September 15, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Kovacic, William E. 1996. “Downsizing Antitrust: Is it Time to End Dual Federal Enforcement?” Antitrust Bulletin 41: 505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x9604100301.Search in Google Scholar
Kovacic, William E. 2003. “The Modern Evolution of U.S. Competition Policy Enforcement Norms.” Antitrust Law Journal 71: 377.Search in Google Scholar
Kovacic, William E. 2012. “The Institutions of Antitrust Law: How Structure Shapes Substance.” Michigan Law Review 110: 1019.Search in Google Scholar
Kovacic, William E., and Mario Mariniello. 2016. “Competition Agency Design in Globalised Markets.” (E15 Initiative, Int’l Ctr. for Trade and Sustainable Dev., Working Paper, Feb. 2016) (on file with the author).Search in Google Scholar
Kovacic, William E., and Marc Winerman. 2010. “Competition Policy and the Application of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.” Antitrust Law Journal 76: 929.Search in Google Scholar
Krist, Austin H. 2015. “Large-Scale Enforcement of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Role of State Attorneys General.” Columbia Law Review 115: 2311.Search in Google Scholar
Lande, Robert H., and Joshua P. Davis. 2008. “Benefits from Private Antitrust Enforcement: An Analysis of Forty Cases.” University of San Francisco Law Review 42: 879.10.2139/ssrn.1105523Search in Google Scholar
Lande, Robert H., and Joshua P. Davis. 2011. “Comparative Deterrence from Private Enforcement and Criminal Enforcement of the U.S. Antitrust Laws.” BYU Law Review 2011: 315.10.2139/ssrn.1565693Search in Google Scholar
Ling, Raymond Z. 2010. “Unscrambling the Organic Eggs: The Growing Divergence between the DOJ and the FTC in Merger Review After Whole Foods.” Brooklyn Law Review 75: 935.Search in Google Scholar
Lipsky, Abbott, B., Joshua, D., Douglas, H., Bruce, H., and John, M. Yun. 2018. “Comment on the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division Public Roundtable Series on Competition and Deregulation, First Roundtable on State Action, Statutory Exemptions and Implied Immunities.” Glob. Antitrust Inst., Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3140743 (accessed April 7, 2024).10.2139/ssrn.3140743Search in Google Scholar
Litwin, Ethan E. 2021. “Antitrust Has Failed.” Constantine Cannon Blog. http://constantinecannon.com/antitrust-group/antitrust-today-blog/antitrust-has-failed (accessed September 22, 2021)Search in Google Scholar
Mah, Scott, Jasdeep Kaur, Emily Marshall, Michelle Wadolowski, and Emily Wood. 2020. “Antitrust Violations.” American Criminal Law Review 57: 413.Search in Google Scholar
McDermott, Will & Emery. 2017. “FTC and DOJ Update Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property.” www.mwe.com/insights/ftc-doj-update-antitrust-guidelines/ (accessed January 18, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O., and Linda Sun. 2021. “Unifying Antitrust Enforcement for the Digital Age.” Washington and Lee Law Review 78: 305.10.2139/ssrn.3669087Search in Google Scholar
McGuire Woods. 2019. “DOJ Launches Interagency Antitrust Procurement “Strike Force”.” www.mcguirewoods.com/client-resources/Alerts/2019/11/doj-launches-interagency-antitrust-procurement-strike-force (accessed November 18, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W. 2022. “Antitrust Rulemaking: The FTC’s Delegation Deficit.” (Ctr. for the Study of the Admin. State, Working Paper 22–18). www.administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Merrill_22-18.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas W., and Kathryn Tongue Watts. 2002. “Agency Rules with the Force of Law: The Original Convention.” Harvard Law Review 116: 467. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342610.Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Benjamin M. 2015. “Note, FRAND-Encumbered SEPs and Injunctions: Why Section 5 of the FTC Act Is an Inappropriate Remedy.” Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 16: 452.Search in Google Scholar
Mosteller, Jeff. 1998. “The Current and Future Climate of Airline Consolidation: The Possible Impact of an Alliance of Two Large Airlines and an Examination of the Proposed American Airlines-British Alliance.” The Journal of Air Law and Commerce 64: 575.Search in Google Scholar
Muris, Timothy J. 2005. “Comments on the FTC–DOJ Clearance Process Before the Antitrust Modernization Committee.” 4–5. www.govinfo.library.unt.edu/amc/commission_hearings/pdf/Muris_Statement.pdf (accessed November 3, 2005).Search in Google Scholar
Muris, Timothy J. 2023. “Neo-Brandeisian Antitrust: Repeating History’s Mistakes.” American Enterprise Institute. http://policycommons.net/artifacts/3443901/neo-brandeisian-antitrust/4243943 (accessed January 30, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Ogur, Jonathan D., Curtis Wagner, and Michael G. Vita. 1988. The Deregulated Airline Industry: A Review of the Evidence, 28. Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission. www.books.google.com/books?id=xhA6AQAAMAAJ.Search in Google Scholar
Ohlhausen, Maureen K. 2016. “Administrative Litigation at the FTC: Effective Tool for Developing the Law or Rubber Stamp?” Journal of Competition Law and Economics 12: 623. https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhw028.Search in Google Scholar
Peay, Lauren Kearney. 2007. “Note: The Cautionary Tale of the Failed 2002 FTC/DOJ Merger Clearance Accord.” Vanderbilt Law Review 60: 1307.Search in Google Scholar
Phillips, Noah J. 2022. Against Antitrust Regulation. Washington: American Enterprise Institute. https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Against-Antitrust-Regulation.pdf?x85095.Search in Google Scholar
PierceJr.Richard J. 2022. “Can the Federal Trade Commission Use Rulemaking to Change Antitrust Law?” (Ctr. for the Study of the Admin. State, Working Paper 21–49). www.administrativestate.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/FTC-Pierce-FINAL.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Portuese, Aurelian. 2022. “Biden Antitrust: The Paradox of the New Antitrust Populism.” George Mason Law Review 29: 1087.Search in Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2004. “Federalism and the Enforcement of Antitrust Laws by State Attorneys General.” Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 2: 5.Search in Google Scholar
Rahman, K. Sabeel, and Lina Khan. 2016. “Restoring Competition in the U.S. Economy.” In Untamed: How to Check Corporate, Financial, and Monopoly Power, edited by Nell Abernathy, Mike Konczal, and Kathryn Milani, 18. Roosevelt Institute. http://rooseveltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/RI-Untamed-201606-1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Reichel, Carsten. 2022. “US DOJ Files First Criminal Charge Under Sherman Act Section 2 in Nearly 50 Years.” Norton Rose Fulbright. www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/14f4c7e7/us-doj-files-first-criminal-charge-under-sherman-act-section-2-in-nearly-50-years.Search in Google Scholar
Ropes, and Gray. 2019. “A Shift on Standard-Essential Patent Remedies? DOJ, USPTO, and NIST Issue New Joint Policy Statement.” www.ropesgray.com/en/newsroom/alerts/2019/12/A-Shift-on-Standard-Essential-Patent-Remedies-DOJ-USPTO-and-NIST-Issue-New-Joint-Policy-Statement (accessed December 24, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Rosman, Mark, John Sack, Karen Sharp, Brent Snyder, and Jeff, VanHooreweghe. 2022. “DOJ Obtains First Criminal Guilty Plea for Monopolization Conduct in Decades.” JD Supra. www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/doj-obtains-first-criminal-guilty-plea-1358152 (accessed November 8, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Rossi, Alberto G. 2002. “Grounding Future Consolidations: United-US Airways Cancel Flight.” Administrative Law Review 54: 883.Search in Google Scholar
Rybnicek, Jan M., and Joshua D. Wright. 2014. “Defining Section 5 of the FTC Act: The Failure of the Common Law Method and the Case for Formal Agency Guidelines.” George Mason Law Review 21: 1287.10.2139/ssrn.2496748Search in Google Scholar
Salop, Steven C., and Lawrence J. White. 1986. “Economic Analysis of Private Antitrust Litigation.” Geological Journal 74: 1001.Search in Google Scholar
Scheffman, David, Malcolm Coate, and Louis Silvia. 2015. “20 Years of Merger Guidelines Enforcement at the FTC: An Economic Perspective.” U.S. Dept. of Justice. www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/atr/legacy/2007/07/11/12881.pdf (accessed August 5, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Shenon, Philip. 2002. “Plan to Split up Antitrust Oversight Stalls.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/18/business/plan-to-split-up-antitrust-oversight-stalls.html (accessed April 7, 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Sidak, J. Gregory, and Hal J. Singer. 2008. “Foxes in the Henhouse: FCC Regulation through Merger Review.” Milken Institute Review 46–54.Search in Google Scholar
Sims, Joe, and Deborah P. Herman. 1997. “The Effect of Twenty Years of Hart-Scott-Rodino on Merger Practice: A Case Study in the Law of Unintended Consequences Applied to Antitrust Legislation.” Antitrust Law Journal 65: 865.Search in Google Scholar
Sisco, Josh, and Alex Daugherty. 2023. Biden Administration Moves to Block JetBlue’s $3.8B Spirit Takeover. Politico. www.politico.com/news/2023/03/07/doj-sues-to-block-jetblues-3-8-billion-spirit-takeover-00085828 (accessed March 7, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Sokol, D. Daniel. 2014. “The Transformation of Vertical Restraints: Per Se Illegality, the Rule of Reason, and Per Se Legality.” Antitrust Law Journal 79: 1003.10.2139/ssrn.2297365Search in Google Scholar
Tritell, Randolph, and Elizabeth Kraus. 2021. “The Federal Trade Commission’s International Antitrust Program.” Federal Trade Commission. www.ftc.gov/system/files/attachments/international-competition/ftc_international_antitrust_program_update_january_2021_fin.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ). 1968. “Merger Guidelines.” www.justice.gov/archives/atr/1968-merger-guidelines.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ). 2009. “Press Release: Justice Department Withdraws Report on Antitrust Monopoly Law.” www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2009/245710.pdf (accessed May 11, 2009).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ). 2020. “Press Release: Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim Announces Re-organization of the Antitrust Division’s Civil Enforcement Program.” www.justice.gov/opa/pr/assistant-attorney-general-makan-delrahim-announces-re-organization-antitrust-divisions-civil (accessed August 20, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ). 2021. “Continued Commitment to International Enforcement.” U.S. Dept. of Justice. www.justice.gov/atr/division-operations/division-update-spring-2021/continued-commitment-international-enforcement (accessed March 24, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division. 1995. “Antitrust Enforcement Guidelines for International Operation.” www.justice.gov/atr/antitrust-enforcement-guidelines-international-operations.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division. 2008. “Competition and Monopoly: Single-Firm Conduct Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act.” www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/atr/legacy/2009/05/11/236681.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division. 2013. “FY 2010 Budget Request at A Glance.” www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/jmd/legacy/2013/09/15/atr-bud-summary.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division. 2020. “Workload Statistics FY 2010–2019.” www.justice.gov/atr/file/788426/download.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division. 2021a. FY 2021 Budget Request at A Glance.” www.justice.gov/doj/page/file/1246781/download.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division. 2021b. “FY 2022 Budget Request at A Glance.” www.justice.gov/jmd/page/file/1398981/download.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division. 2022. “FY 2023 Budget Request at a Glance.” www.justice.gov/jmd/page/file/1487801/download.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ) & Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2007. “Memorandum of Agreement Between the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice Concerning Clearance Procedures for Investigations.” www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/atr/legacy/2007/07/17/10170.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ) & Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2023. “Merger Guidelines (Draft for Public Comment, 2023).” https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/p859910draftmergerguidelines2023.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ) & U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). 2013. “Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Commitments 6.” www.justice.gov/atr/page/file/1118381/download (accessed January 8, 2013).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Maritime Commission (FMC). 2021. “Press Release: New FMC and DoJ MOU Supports Interagency Collaboration on Antitrust Issues.” www.fmc.gov/new-fmc-and-doj-mou-supports-interagency-collaboration-on-antitrust-issues (accessed July 12, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2002. “Press Release: FTC and DOJ Announce New Clearance Procedure for Antitrust Matters.” www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2002/03/ftc-doj-announce-new-clearance-procedures-antitrust-matters (accessed March 5, 2002).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2008. “Press Release: Statement of Commissioners Harbour, Leibowitz, and Rosch on the Issuance of the Section 2 Report by the Department of Justice.” www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/ftc-commissioners-react-department-justice-report-competition-monopoly-single-firm-conduct-under/080908section2stmt.pdf (accessed September 8, 2008).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2015. “Press Release: FTC Issues Statement of Principles Regarding Enforcement of FTC Act as a Competition Statute.” www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2015/08/ftc-issues-statement-principles-regarding-enforcement-ftc-act-competition-statute (accessed August 13, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2017. “Press Release: FTC Charges Qualcomm with Monopolizing Key Semiconductor Device Used in Cell Phones.” www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2017/01/ftc-charges-qualcomm-monopolizing-key-semiconductor-device-used-cell-phones (accessed January 17, 2017).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2021a. “Press Release: FTC Votes to Update Rulemaking Procedures, Sets Stage for Stronger Deterrence of Corporate Misconduct.” www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/07/ftc-votes-update-rulemaking-procedures-sets-stage-stronger-deterrence-corporate-misconduct (accessed July 1, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2021b. “Press Release: FTC, DOJ Temporarily Suspend Discretionary Practice of Early Termination.” www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2021/02/ftc-doj-temporarily-suspend-discretionary-practice-early-termination (accessed February 4, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2021c. “Statement of Chair Lina M. Khan Joined by Commissioner Rohit Chopra and Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter on the Withdrawal of the Statement of Enforcement Principles Regarding “Unfair Methods of Competition” Under Section 5 of the FTC Act.” www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/1591498/final_statement_of_chair_khan_joined_by_rc_and_rks_on_section_5_0.pdf (accessed July 1, 2021).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2022. “Policy Statement Regarding the Scope of Unfair Methods of Competition Under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.” 3–6. www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/p221202sec5enforcementpolicystatement_002.pdf (accessed November 10, 2022).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). 2012. “Memoranda from the Division of Risk, Strategy, and Financial Innovation and the Office of the General Counsel to Staff of the Rulewriting Divisions and Offices of the SEC.” www.sec.gov/divisions/riskfin/rsfi_guidance_econ_analy_secrulemaking.pdf (accessed March 16, 2012).Search in Google Scholar
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). 2020. “Press Release: Securities and Exchange Commission and Justice Department’s Antitrust Division Sign Historic Memorandum of Understanding.” http://sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-140 (accessed June 22, 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Weinstein, Samuel N. 2019. “Financial Regulation in the (Receding) Shadow of Antitrust.” Temple Law Review 91: 447.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Christine. 2019. “A Court’s Dangerous Antitrust Overreach.” Wall Street Journal. www.wsj.com/articles/a-courts-dangerous-antitrust-overreach-11559085055 (accessed May 28, 2019).Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Joshua D. 2013. “Revisiting Antitrust Institutions: The Case for Guidelines to Recalibrate the Federal Trade Commission’s Section 5 Unfair Methods of Competition Authority.” Concurrence: Competition Law Journal 4: 1.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Joshua D. 2015. “Remarks at the Global Antitrust Institute Invitational Moot Court Competition: Judging Antitrust.” www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/626231/150221judgingantitrust-1.pdf (accessed February 21, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Joshua D., and Alexander Krzepicki. 2020. “What Is an Independent Agency to Do? The Trump Administration’s Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship and the Federal Trade Commission.” Administrative Law Review 6: 29.10.2139/ssrn.3770015Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Joshua D., Elyse Dorsey, Jonathan Klick, and Jan M. Rybnicek. 2019. “Requiem for a Paradox: The Dubious Rise and Inevitable Fall of Hipster Antitrust.” Arizona State Law Journal 51: 293.10.2139/ssrn.3249524Search in Google Scholar
Yoo, Christopher S. 2014. “Merger Review by the Federal Communications Commission: Comcast-NBC Universal.” Review of Industrial Organization 45: 295–321.10.1007/s11151-014-9437-9Search in Google Scholar
Zegart, Amy B. 2004. “Blue Ribbons, Black Boxes: Toward a Better Understanding of Presidential Commissions.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 34: 366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00049.x.Search in Google Scholar
Zwisler, Margaret M., and Amanda P. Reeves. 2013. “Antitrust Judgments in Bench Trials as Evidence: The Unintended Consequences of Section 5(A).” Sedona Conference Journal 14: 113.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Trial Selection and Estimating Damages Equations
- On the Role of Sales Taxes for Efficient Compensation of Property Loss Under Strict Liability
- Broadband Internet and Crime
- Unraveling the Peltzman Effect: The Significance of Agent’s Type
- Reimagining Antitrust Institutions: A (Modest?) Proposal
- Legal Framework for the Protection of Entrepreneurs’ Rights
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Trial Selection and Estimating Damages Equations
- On the Role of Sales Taxes for Efficient Compensation of Property Loss Under Strict Liability
- Broadband Internet and Crime
- Unraveling the Peltzman Effect: The Significance of Agent’s Type
- Reimagining Antitrust Institutions: A (Modest?) Proposal
- Legal Framework for the Protection of Entrepreneurs’ Rights