Behavioral Contract Law

References

Alter, A.L., Oppenheimer, D.M., Epley, N., and Eyre, R.N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 136: 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569.Search in Google Scholar

Ayres, I. (2003). Valuing modern contract scholarship. Yale Law J. 112: 881. https://doi.org/10.2307/3657492.Search in Google Scholar

Ayres, I. (2012). Regulating opt-out: an economic theory of altering rules. Yale Law J. 121: 2032.Search in Google Scholar

Ayres, I. and Schwartz, A. (2014). The No-reading problem in consumer contract law. Stanford Law Rev. 66: 545.Search in Google Scholar

Baird, D.G. (2013). Reconstructing contracts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.10.2307/j.ctvjsf5cdSearch in Google Scholar

Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F., and Trossen, D.R. (2014). Does Anyone read the fine print? Consumer attention to standard-form contracts. J. Leg. Stud. 43: 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/674424.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Gill, O. (2004). Seduction by plastic. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 98: 1373.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Gill, O. (2006). Bundling and consumer misperception. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 73: 33–61.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Gill, O. (2008). The behavioral economics of consumer contracts. Minn. Law Rev. 92: 749.Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Gill, O. (2012). Seduction by contract: law, economics, and psychology in consumer markets. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199663361.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Gill, O. and Ben-Shahar, O. (2021). Rethinking nudge: an information-costs theory of default rules. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 88: 531.10.2139/ssrn.3582129Search in Google Scholar

Bar-Gill, O. and Warren, E. (2008). Making credit safer. Univ. Penn. Law Rev. 157: 1.Search in Google Scholar

Barr, M.S., Mullainathan, S., and Shafir, E. (2008). Behaviorally informed financial services regulation. University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L.A. and Posner, R.A. (2006). One-sided contracts in competitive consumer markets. Mich. Law Rev. 104: 827.10.1017/CBO9780511611179.003Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G.S. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. J. Polit. Econ. 70: 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/258584.Search in Google Scholar

Ben-Shahar, O. and Schneider, C.E. (2011). The failure of mandated disclosure. Univ. Penn. Law Rev. 159: 647.10.2139/ssrn.1567284Search in Google Scholar

Ben-Shahar, O. and Schneider, C.E. (2014). More than you wanted to know: the failure of mandated disclosure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.10.23943/princeton/9780691161709.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brito, D.L. and Hartley, P.R. (1995). Consumer rationality and credit cards. J. Polit. Econ. 103: 400–433. https://doi.org/10.1086/261988.Search in Google Scholar

Bubb, R. and Pildes, R.H. (2014). How behavioral economics trims its sails and why. Harv. Law Rev. 127: 1593.Search in Google Scholar

Calabresi, G. and Douglas Melamed, A. (1972). Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: one view of the cathedral. Harv. Law Rev. 85: 1088. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340059.Search in Google Scholar

Camerer, C.F. and Kunreuther, H. (1989). Decision processes for low probability events: policy implications. J. Policy. Anal. Manage. 8: 565–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/3325045.Search in Google Scholar

Camerer, C., Babcock, L., George, L., and Thaler, R. (1997). Labor supply of New York cabdrivers: one day at a time. Q. J. Econ. 112: 407–441. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555244.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, T. and Gross, T. (2014). How many pears would a pear packer Pack if a pear packer could Pack pears at quasi-exogenously varying piece rates? J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 99: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Coase, R.H. (1960). The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3: 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560.Search in Google Scholar

Cooter, R.D. and Ulen, T.S. (2011). Law and economics, 6th ed. Pearson, Hoboken, NJ, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Dafny, L. and Dranove, D. (2008). Do report cards tell consumers anything they don’t already know? The case of Medicare HMOs. Rand J. Econ. 39: 790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00039.x.Search in Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J. Econ. Lit. 47: 315. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315.Search in Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S. and Malmendier, U. (2006). Paying not to go to the gym. Am. Econ. Rev. 96: 694. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.3.694.Search in Google Scholar

Depoorter, B. and Tontrup, S. (2012). How law frames moral intuitions: the expressive effect of specific performance. Ariz. Law Rev. 54: 673.Search in Google Scholar

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Finance Protection Act (2010). Pub. L. No. 111-203 (§ 929-Z, 124 Stat).Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, H.T. (1992). The growing disjunction between legal education and the legal profession. Mich. Law Rev. 91: 34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289788.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, H.T. (1993). The growing disjunction between legal education and the legal profession: a postscript. Mich. Law Rev. 91: 2191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289731.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M.A. (1982). The bargain principle and its limits. Harv. Law Rev. 95: 741. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340776.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M.A. (2000). The emergence of dynamic contract law. Calif. Law Rev. 88: 1743. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481209.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M.A. (2005). Actual and virtual specific performance: the theory of efficient breach and the indifference principle in contract law. Calif. Law Rev. 93: 975.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M.A. (2014). Behavioral economics and contract law. In: Zamir, E. and Teichman, D. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of behavioral Economics and the law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, pp. 438–464.10.1093/oso/9780199731404.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M.A. (2018). Foundational principles of contract law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.10.1093/oso/9780199731404.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, T. and Miller, G.P. (2015). Damages versus specific performance: lessons from commercial contracts. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 12: 29–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12064.Search in Google Scholar

Engel, K.C. and McCoy, P.A. (2002). A tale of three markets: the law and economics of predatory lending. Tex. Law Rev. 80: 1259.10.2139/ssrn.286649Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, R.A. (2006). Behavioral economics: human errors and market corrections. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 73: 111.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, R.A. (2008). Exchange: the neoclassical economics of consumer contracts. Minn. Law Rev. 92: 803.Search in Google Scholar

Farnsworth, W. (1999). Do parties to nuisance cases bargain after judgment? A glimpse inside the cathedral. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 66: 373. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600470.Search in Google Scholar

Farnsworth, E.A. (2004). Farnsworth on contracts, 3rd ed. Aspen Publishers, Santaquin, UT, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, E., Hart, O., and Zehnder, C. (2011). Contracts as reference points – experimental evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 101: 493. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.493.Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, Y. and Teichman, D. (2011). Are all contractual obligations created equal? Georgetown Law J. 100: 5.Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, Y., Schurr, A., and Teichman, D. (2013). Reference points and contractual choices: an experimental examination. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 10: 512–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12018.Search in Google Scholar

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 19: 25. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732.Search in Google Scholar

Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. J. Leg. Stud. 29: 1. https://doi.org/10.1086/468061.Search in Google Scholar

Goetz, C.J. and Scott, R.E. (1977). Liquidated damages, penalties, and the just compensation principle. Columbia Law Rev. 77: 554. https://doi.org/10.2307/1121823.Search in Google Scholar

Hanson, J.D. and Kysar, D.A. (1999). Taking behavioralism seriously: some problems of market manipulation. N. Y. Univ. Law Rev. 74: 630.10.2307/1342413Search in Google Scholar

Hart, O. and Moore, J. (2008). Contracts as reference points. Q. J. Econ. 123: 1. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Hillman, R.A. and Rachlinski, J.J. (2002). Standard form contracts in the electronic age. NYU Law Review 77: 429.10.2139/ssrn.287819Search in Google Scholar

Hippel, S. and Hoeppner, S. (2021). Contracts as reference points: a replication. Int’l Review of Law and Economics 65: 105973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105973.Search in Google Scholar

Ho, D.E. (2012). Fudging the nudge: information disclosure and restaurant grading. Yale Law J. 122: 574.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, D.A. and Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2013). The psychology of contract precautions. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 80: 395.10.2139/ssrn.2000823Search in Google Scholar

Hossain, T. and List, J.A. (2012). The behavioralist visits the factory: increasing productivity using simple framing manipulations. Manag. Sci. 58: 2151–2167. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1544.Search in Google Scholar

Jin, G.Z. and Leslie, P. (2003). The effect of information on product quality: evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Q. J. Econ. 118: 409–451. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303321675428.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, E.J. and Goldstein, D.G. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science 302: 1338. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan, New York, NY, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplow, L. (1992). Rules versus standards: an economic analysis. Duke Law J. 42: 557. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372840.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. (2006). Fairness versus welfare. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Kessler, F. (1943). Contracts of adhesion – some thoughts about freedom of contract. Columbia Law Rev. 43: 629. https://doi.org/10.2307/1117230.Search in Google Scholar

Korobkin, R.B. (1998). The status quo bias and contract default rules. Cornell Law Rev. 83: 608.10.1037/e683302011-044Search in Google Scholar

Korobkin, R.B. (2000). Behavioral economics, contract formation, and contract law. In: Sunstein, C.R. (Ed.), Behavioral Law and economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 116–143.10.1017/CBO9781139175197.005Search in Google Scholar

Korobkin, R.B. (2003). Bounded rationality, standard form contracts, and unconscionability. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 70: 1203. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600574.Search in Google Scholar

Koszegi, B. (2015). Behavioral contract theory. J. Econ. Lit. 52: 1075.10.1257/jel.52.4.1075Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1996). The Structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lake River Corp. v. Carborundum Co. (1985). 769 F.2d 1984 (7th Cir. 1985). Opinion by Judge Richard Posner.Search in Google Scholar

Langevoort, D.C. (1998). Behavioral theories of judgment and decision making in legal scholarship: a literature review. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 51: 1499.Search in Google Scholar

Langevoort, D.C. (2001). The human nature of corporate boards: law, norms, and the unintended consequences of independence and accountability. Georgetown Law J. 89: 797–832.10.2139/ssrn.241402Search in Google Scholar

Laycock, D. (1990). The death of the irreparable injury rule. Harv. Law Rev. 103: 687. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341345.Search in Google Scholar

Laycock, D. (1991). The death of the irreparable injury rule. New York: Oxford University Press.10.2307/1341345Search in Google Scholar

Lubet, S. (1997). Is legal theory good for anything? Univ. Ill Law Rev. 1997: 193.Search in Google Scholar

Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2007). What’s in a standard form contract? An empirical analysis of software license agreements. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 4: 677–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00104.x.Search in Google Scholar

Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2012). Does contract disclosure matter? J. Inst. Theor. Econ. JITE 168: 94. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245612799440122.Search in Google Scholar

Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2015). (Even) more than you wanted to know about the failures of disclosure: a review of Omri ben-shahar and Carl schneider’s More than you Wanted to know. Jerus. Rev. Leg. Stud. 11: 63. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrls/jlu018.Search in Google Scholar

Mathis, K. and Tor, A. (Eds.) (2020). Consumer law and economics. Springer International, New York, NY, USA.10.1007/978-3-030-49028-7Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, G. and Klick, J. (2006). Government regulation of irrationality: moral and cognitive hazards. Minn. Law Rev. 90: 1621.Search in Google Scholar

Mullenix, L.S. (2015). Gaming the system: protecting consumers from unconscionable contractual forum-selection and arbitration clauses. Hastings Law J. 66: 719.Search in Google Scholar

Nisbett, R.E. (2015). Mindware: tools for smart thinking. Canada: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Perillo, J.M. (2009). Calamari and Perillo on contracts, 6th ed. West Academic Publishing, Saint Paul, MN, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill Series in Social Psychology, New York, NY, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, E.A. (2003). Economic analysis of contract law after three decades: success or failure? Yale Law J. 112: 829. https://doi.org/10.2307/3657491.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, E.A. (2015). Contract Law and theory, 2nd ed. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

Rakoff, T.D. (1983). Contracts of adhesion: an essay in reconstruction. Harv. Law Rev. 96: 1174. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341009.Search in Google Scholar

Restatement (Second) of Contracts (1981). American Law Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Riker, W.H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. (1979). The case for specific performance. Yale Law J. 89: 271. https://doi.org/10.2307/795838.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. (2015). Regulating for rationality. Stanford Law Rev. 67: 1373.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. and Scott, R.E. (2003). Contract theory and the limits of contract law. Yale Law J. 113: 541. https://doi.org/10.2307/3657531.Search in Google Scholar

Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Curr. Biol. 21: R941–R945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030.Search in Google Scholar

Slawson, W.D. (1971). Standard form contracts and democratic control of lawmaking power. Harv. Law Rev. 84: 529. https://doi.org/10.2307/1339552.Search in Google Scholar

Stigler, G.J. (1982). The process and progress of economics, pp. 1–20, Available at: https://www.Nobelprize.Org/Nobel_Prizes/Economic-Sciences/Laureates/1982/Stigler-Lecture.Pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2011). Empirically informed regulation. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 78: 1349.Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2013). Simpler: the future of government. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein, C.R. (2014). The real world of cost-benefit analysis: thirty-six questions (and almost as many answers). Columbia Law Rev. 114: 167.10.2139/ssrn.2199112Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. (2015). Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. W.W. Norton Company, Inc, New York, NY, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2021). Nudge: the final edition. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683.Search in Google Scholar

Ulen, T.S. (1984). The efficiency of specific performance: toward a unified theory of contract remedies. Mich. Law Rev. 83: 341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1288569.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, E. (2007). Unsafe at any rate. J. Democr. 2007: 8–19.10.1017/CCOL9780521848015.002Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2010). Do liquidated damages encourage breach? A psychological experiment. Mich. Law Rev. 108: 633.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2015). Incentives to breach. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 17: 290–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahu019.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson-Ryan, T. and Baron, J. (2009). Moral judgment and moral heuristics in breach of contract. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 6: 405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01148.x.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson-Ryan, T. and Hoffman, D.A. (2010). Breach is for suckers. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 63.10.2139/ssrn.1441605Search in Google Scholar

Wilkinson-Ryan, T. and Hoffman, D.A. (2015). The common sense of contract formation. Stanford Law Rev. 67: 1269.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, B. (2019). Unconscionability as a sword: the case for an affirmative cause of action. Calif. Law Rev. 107: 2015–2070.Search in Google Scholar

Willis, L.E. (2013). When nudges fail: slippery defaults. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 80: 1155.10.2139/ssrn.2142989Search in Google Scholar

Zamir, E. and Teichman, D. (2018). Behavioral Law and economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.10.1093/oso/9780190901349.001.0001Search in Google Scholar