Synthetic polymer materials for forward osmosis (FO) membranes and FO applications: a review

References

Ahn HR, Tak TM, Kwon YN. Preparation and applications of poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) modified cellulose acetate (CA) membranes for forward osmosis (FO) processes. Desalin Water Treat 2015; 53: 1–7.10.1080/19443994.2013.834516Search in Google Scholar

Alkhudhiri A, Darwish N, Hilal N. Membrane distillation: a comprehensive review. Desalination 2012; 287: 2–18.10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.027Search in Google Scholar

Amy G, Ghaffour N, Li Z, Francis L, Linares RV, Missimer T, Lattemann S. Membrane-based seawater desalination present and future prospects. Desalination 2017; 401: 16–21.10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Anderson DK. Concentration of dilute industrial wastes by direct osmosis; PhD dissertation, University of Rhode Island: Kingston, RI, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

Arthanareeswaran G, Thanikaivelan P, Srinivasn K, Mohan D, Rajendran M. Synthesis, characterization and thermal studies on cellulose acetate membranes with additive. Eur Polym J 2004; 40: 2153–2159.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.04.024Search in Google Scholar

Cai T, Li X, Wan C, Chung TS. Zwitterionic polymers grafted poly(ether sulfone) hollow fiber membranes and their antifouling behaviors for osmotic power generation. J Membr Sci 2016; 497: 142–152.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.037Search in Google Scholar

Castrillón SRV, Lu X, Shaffer DL, Elimelech M. Amine enrichment and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) surface modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for organic fouling control. J Membr Sci 2014; 450: 331–339.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.028Search in Google Scholar

Cath TY, Gormly S, Beaudry EG, Flynn MT, Adams VD, Childress AE. Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis. J Membr Sci 2005; 257: 85–98.10.1016/j.memsci.2004.08.039Search in Google Scholar

Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci 2006; 281: 70–87.10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048Search in Google Scholar

Chekli L, Phuntsho S, Kim JE, Kim J, Choi JY, Choi JS, Kim S, Kim JH, Hong SK, Sohn J, et al. A comprehensive review of hybrid forward osmosis systems: performance, applications and future prospects. J Membr Sci 2016; 497: 430–449.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.041Search in Google Scholar

Chisca S, Duong PHH, Emwas A-H, Sougratb R, Nunes SP. Crosslinked copolyazoles with a zwitterionic structure for organic solvent resistant membranes. Polym Chem 2015; 6: 543–554.10.1039/C4PY01293CSearch in Google Scholar

Cho YH, Han J, Han S, Guiver MD, Park HB. Polyamide thin-film composite membranes based on carboxylated polysulfone microporous support membranes for forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 2013; 445: 220–227.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Chou S, Shi L, Wang R, Tang CY, Qiu C, Fane AG. Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane. Desalination 2010; 261: 365–372.10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.027Search in Google Scholar

Chung TS, Li X, Ong RC, Ge Q, Wang H, Han G. Emerging forward osmosis (FO) technologies and challenges ahead for clean water and clean energy applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2012a; 1: 246–257.10.1016/j.coche.2012.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Chung TS, Zhang S, Wang KY, Su J, Ling MM. Forward osmosis processes: yesterday, today and tomorrow. Desalination 2012b; 287: 78–81.10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.019Search in Google Scholar

Cui Y, Wang H, Wang H, Chung TS. Micro-morphology and formation of layer-by-layer membranes and their performance in osmotically driven processes. Chem Eng Sci 2013; 101: 13–26.10.1016/j.ces.2013.06.011Search in Google Scholar

Duong PHH, Chisca S, Hong PY, Cheng H, Nunes SP, Chung TS. Hydroxyl functionalized polytriazole-co-polyoxadiazole as substrates for forward osmosis membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015; 7: 3960–3973.10.1021/am508387dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Emadzadeh D, Lau WJ, Rahbari-Sisakht M, Ilbeygi H, Rana D, Matsuura T, Ismail AF. Synthesis, modification and optimization of titanate nanotubes polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane for forward osmosis (FO) application. Chem Eng J 2015; 281: 243–251.10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.035Search in Google Scholar

Flanagan MF, Escobar IC. Novel charged and hydrophilized polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes for forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 2013; 434: 85–92.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.039Search in Google Scholar

Garcia-Castello EM, McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M. Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis, J Membr Sci 2009; 338: 61–66.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.011Search in Google Scholar

Ge Q, Su J, Amy G, Chung TS. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Res 2012; 46: 1318–1326.10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.043Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ge Q, Ling M, Chung TS. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J Membr Sci 2013; 442: 225–237.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.046Search in Google Scholar

Geise GM, Lee HS, Miller DJ, Freeman BD, Mcgrath JE, Paul DR. Water purification by membranes: the role of polymer science. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2010; 48: 1685–1718.10.1002/polb.22037Search in Google Scholar

Gerstandt K, Peinemann K-V, Skihagen SE, Thorsen T, Holt T. Membrane processes in energy supply for an osmotic power plant. Desalination 2008; 224: 64–70.10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.080Search in Google Scholar

Goh PS, Matsuura T, Ismail AF, Hilal N. Recent trends in membranes and membrane processes for desalination. Desalination 2016; 391: 43–60.10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.016Search in Google Scholar

Guiver M, Croteau S, Hazlett J, Kutowy O. Synthesis and characterization of carboxylated polysulfones. Br Polym J 1990; 23: 29–39.10.1002/pi.4980230107Search in Google Scholar

Han G, Chung TS, Toriida M, Tamai S. Thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes with novel hydrophilic supports for desalination. J Membr Sci 2012a; 423–424: 543–555.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Han G, Zhang S, Li X, Widjojo N, Chung TS. Thin film composite forward osmosis membranes based on polydopamine modified polysulfone substrates with enhancements in both water flux and salt rejection. Chem Eng Sci 2012b; 80: 219–231.10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.033Search in Google Scholar

Han G, Wit JS, Chung TS. Water reclamation from emulsified oily wastewater via effective forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes under the PRO mode. Water Res 2015; 81: 54–63.10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.048Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Han G, Zhao BW, Fu FJ, Chung TS, Weber M, Staudt C, Maletzko C. High performance thin-film composite membranes with mesh-reinforced hydrophilic sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) substrates for osmotically driven processes. J Membr Sci 2016; 502: 84–93.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Harrison WL, Hickner MA, Kim YS, McGrath JE. Poly(arylene ether sulfone) copolymers and related systems from disulfonated monomer building blocks synthesis, characterization, and performance-a topical review. Fuel Cells 2005; 5: 201–212.10.1002/fuce.200400084Search in Google Scholar

Hausman R, Digman B, Escobar IC, Coleman M, Chung TS. Functionalization of polybenzimidizole membranes to impart negative charge and hydrophilicity. J Membr Sci 2010; 363: 195–203.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.027Search in Google Scholar

Hilal N, Al-Zoubi H, Darwish NA, Mohammad AW, Arabi MA. A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 2004; 170: 281–308.10.1016/j.desal.2004.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Huang LW, Arena JT, McCutcheon JR. Surface modified PVDF nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 2016; 49: 352–360.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.030Search in Google Scholar

Jung B, Yoon JK, Kim B, Rhee HW. Effect of molecular weight of polymeric additives on formation, permeation properties and hypochlorite treatment of asymmetric polyacrylonitrile membranes. J Membr Sci 2004; 243: 45–57.10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.011Search in Google Scholar

Kang GD, Cao YM. Application and modification of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) membranes-a review. J Membr Sci 2014; 463: 145–165.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.055Search in Google Scholar

Klaysom C, Cath TY, Depuydt T, Vankelecom IFJ. Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. Chem Soc Rev 2013; 42: 6959–6989.10.1039/c3cs60051cSearch in Google Scholar

Kravath RE, Davis JA. Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis. Desalination 1975; 16: 151–155.10.1016/S0011-9164(00)82089-5Search in Google Scholar

Lau WJ, Ismail AF, Misdan N, Kassim MA. A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: a review. Desalination 2012; 287: 190–199.10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Li D, Wang H. Recent developments in reverse osmosis desalination membranes. J Mater Chem 2010; 20: 4551–4566.10.1039/b924553gSearch in Google Scholar

Li Z, Yangali-Quintanilla V, Valladares-Linares R, Li Q, Zhan T, Amy G. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis. Water Res 2012; 46: 195–204.10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Li X, Zhang S, Fu F, Chung TS. Deformation and reinforcement of thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide-imide (PAI) membranes for osmotic power generation. J Membr Sci 2013; 434: 204–217.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.049Search in Google Scholar

Li P, Lim SS, Neo JG, Ong RC, Weber M, Staudt C, Widjojo N, Maletzko C, Chung TS. Short- and long-term performance of the thin-film composite forward osmosis (TFC-FO) hollow fiber membranes for oily wastewater purification. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014; 53: 14056–14064.10.1021/ie502365pSearch in Google Scholar

Li Z, Valladares-Linares R, Bucs S, Aubry C, Ghaffour N, Vrouwenvelder JS, Amy G. Calcium carbonate scaling in seawater desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: mechanism and implications. J Membr Sci 2015; 481: 36–43.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.055Search in Google Scholar

Li X, Cai T, Chen C, Chung TS. Negatively charged hyperbranched polyglycerol grafted membranes for osmotic power generation from municipal wastewater. Water Res 2016a; 89: 50–58.10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Li D, Yan Y, Wang H. Recent advances in polymer and polymer composite membranes for reverse and forward osmosis processes. Prog Polym Sci 2016b; 61: 104–155.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Li Z, Valladares-Linares R, Bucs S, Fortunato L, Hélix-Nielsen C, Vrouwenvelder JS, Ghaffour N, Leiknes T, Amy G. Aquaporin based biomimetic membrane in forward osmosis: chemical cleaning resistance and practical operation. Desalination 2017; 420: 208–215.10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.015Search in Google Scholar

Liang CZ, Sun SP, Zhao BW, Chung TS. Integration of nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with coagulation-flocculation to treat colored wastewater from a dyestuff manufacturer: a pilot-scale study. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015; 54: 11159–11166.10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03193Search in Google Scholar

Ling MM, Chung TS. Novel dual-stage FO system for sustainable protein enrichment using nanoparticles as intermediate draw solutes. J Membr Sci 2011; 372: 201–209.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Loeb S, Sourirajan S. Sea water demineralization by means of an osmotic membrane. Adv Chem Ser 1963; 38: 117–132.10.1021/ba-1963-0038.ch009Search in Google Scholar

Lu X, Castrillón SRV, Shaffer DL, Ma J, Elimelech M. In situ surface chemical modification of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes for enhanced organic fouling resistance. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 12219–12228.10.1021/es403179mSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Lu X, Boo C, Ma J, Elimelech M. Bidirectional diffusion of ammonium and sodium cations in forward osmosis: role of membrane active layer surface chemistry and charge. Environ Sci Technol 2014; 48: 14369–14376.10.1021/es504162vSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Lu DP, Zou H, Guan R, Dai H, Lu L. Sulfonation of polyethersulfone by chlorosulfonic acid. Polym Bull 2015; 54: 21–28.10.1007/s00289-005-0361-xSearch in Google Scholar

Luo L, Wang P, Zhang S, Han G, Chung TS. Novel thin-film composite tri-bore hollow fiber membrane fabrication for forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 2014; 461: 28–38.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Lutchmiah K, Verliefde ARD, Roest K, Rietveld, LC, Cornelissen ER. Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: a review. Water Res 2014; 58: 179–197.10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Macedonio F, Drioli E, Gusev AA, Bardow A, Semiat R, Kurihara M. Efficient technologies for worldwide clean water supply. Chem Eng Process 2012; 51: 2–17.10.1016/j.cep.2011.09.011Search in Google Scholar

McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005; 174: 1–11.10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.002Search in Google Scholar

McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J Membr Sci 2006; 278: 114–123.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.10.048Search in Google Scholar

McGovern RK, Lienhard V JH. On the potential of forward osmosis to energetically outperform reverse osmosis desalination. J Membr Sci 2014; 469: 245–250.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.061Search in Google Scholar

Nan Q, Li P, Cao B. Fabrication of positively charged nanofiltration membrane via the layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide and polyethylenimine for desalination. Appl Surf Sci 2016; 387: 521–528.10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.150Search in Google Scholar

Niksefat N, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A. The effect of SiO₂ nanoparticles on morphology and performance of thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis application. Desalination 2014; 343: 140–146.10.1016/j.desal.2014.03.031Search in Google Scholar

Ong RC, Chung TS, Wit JS, Helmer BJ. Novel cellulose ester substrates for high performance flat-sheet thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. J Membr Sci 2015; 473: 63–71.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.046Search in Google Scholar

Pandey A. Freshwater management: an approach to address the 21st century water crisis. Int J Innov Res Dev 2015; 4: 109–118.Search in Google Scholar

Rana D, Matsuura T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chem Rev 2010; 110: 2448–2471.10.1021/cr800208ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Rastogi NK. Opportunities and challenges in application of forward osmosis in food processing. Cri Rev Food Sci 2016; 56: 266–291.10.1080/10408398.2012.724734Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Ren J, McCutcheon JR. A new commercial thin film composite membrane for forward osmosis. Desalination 2014; 343: 187–193.10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.026Search in Google Scholar

Ren J, O’Grady B, Jesus G, McCutcheon JR. Sulfonated polysulfone supported high performance thin film composite membranes for forward osmosis. Polymer 2016; 103: 486–497.10.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.058Search in Google Scholar

Sarp S, Li Z, Saththasivam J. Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO): past experiences, current developments, and future prospects. Desalination 2016; 389: 2–14.10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.008Search in Google Scholar

Sata H, Murayama M, Shimamoto S. 5.4 Properties and applications of cellulose triacetate film. Macromol Symp 2004; 208: 323–334.10.1002/masy.200450413Search in Google Scholar

Setiawan L, Wang R, Li K, Fane AG. Fabrication of novel poly(amide-imide) forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with a positively charged nanofiltration-like selective layer. J Membr Sci 2011; 369: 196–205.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.067Search in Google Scholar

Setiawan L, Wang R, Tan S, Shi L, Fane AG. Fabrication of poly(amide-imide)-polyethersulfone dual layer hollow fiber membranes applied in forward osmosis by combined polyelectrolyte cross-linking and depositions. Desalination 2013; 312: 99–106.10.1016/j.desal.2012.10.032Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer DL, Werber JR, Jaramillo H, Lin S, Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: where are we now? Desalination 2015; 356: 271–284.10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.031Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer DL, Tousley ME, Elimelech M. Influence of polyamide membrane surface chemistry on gypsum scaling behavior. J Membr Sci 2017; 525: 249–256.10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.003Search in Google Scholar

She Q, Wang R, Fane AG, Tang CY. Membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes: a review. J Membr Sci 2016; 499: 201–233.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.040Search in Google Scholar

Su J, Yang Q, Teo JF, Chung TS. Cellulose acetate nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis processes. J Membr Sci 2010; 355: 36–44.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Su J, Zhang S, Ling MM, Chung TS. Forward osmosis: an emerging technology for sustainable supply of clean water. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2012; 14: 507–511.10.1007/s10098-012-0486-1Search in Google Scholar

Tang YP, Wigjojo N, Shi GM, Chung TS, Weber M, Maletzko C. Development of flat-sheet membranes for C1-C4 alcohols dehydration via pervaporation from sulfonated polyphenylsulfone (sPPSU). J Membr Sci 2012; 415–416: 686–695.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.056Search in Google Scholar

Tansel B, Sager J, Rector T, Garland J, Strayer RF, Levine L, Robert M, Hummerick M, Bauer J. Significance of hydrated radius and hydration shells on ionic permeability during nanofiltration in dead end and cross flow modes. Sep Purif Technol 2006; 51: 40–47.10.1016/j.seppur.2005.12.020Search in Google Scholar

Thorsen T, Holt T. The potential for power production from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis. J Membr Sci 2009; 335: 103–110.10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Vatèle JM, Hanessian S. Design and reactivity of organic functional groups-preparation and nucleophilic displacement reactions of imidazole-a-sulfonates (Imidazylates). Tetrahedron 1996; 52: 10557–10568.10.1016/0040-4020(96)00586-8Search in Google Scholar

Wagh P, Parungao G, Viola RE, Escobar IC. A new technique to fabricate high-performance biologically inspired membranes for water treatment. Sep Purif Technol 2015; 156: 754–765.10.1016/j.seppur.2015.10.073Search in Google Scholar

Wang YQ, Xu TW. Anchoring hydrophilic polymer in substrate: an easy approach for improving the performance of TFC FO membrane. J Membr Sci 2015; 476: 330–339.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.025Search in Google Scholar

Wang KY, Chung TS, Qin JJ. Polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes applied in forward osmosis process. J Membr Sci 2007; 300: 6–12.10.1016/j.memsci.2007.05.035Search in Google Scholar

Wang KY, Yang Q, Chung TS, Rajagopalan R. Enhanced forward osmosis from chemically modified polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with a thin wall. Chem Eng Sci 2009; 64: 1577–1584.10.1016/j.ces.2008.12.032Search in Google Scholar

Wang KY, Ong RC, Chung TS. Double-skinned forward osmosis membranes for reducing internal concentration polarization within the porous sublayer. Ind Eng Chem Res 2010; 49: 4824–4831.10.1021/ie901592dSearch in Google Scholar

Wang DS, Zou W, Li LL, Wei Q, Sun SD, Zhao CS. Preparation and characterization of functional carboxylic polyethersulfone membrane. J Membr Sci 2011; 374: 93–101.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.021Search in Google Scholar

Wang KY, Chung TS, Amy G. Developing thin-film-composite forward osmosis membranes on the PES/SPSf substrate through interfacial polymerization. AIChE J 2012; 58: 770–781.10.1002/aic.12635Search in Google Scholar

Wang S, Cai J, Ding W, Xu Z, Wang Z. Bio-inspired aquaporinz containing double-skinned forward osmosis membrane synthesized through layer-by-layer assembly. Membranes 2015; 5: 369–384.10.3390/membranes5030369Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Wang Y, Li X, Cheng C, He Y, Pan J, Xu T. Second interfacial polymerization on polyamide surface using aliphatic diamine with improved performance of TFC FO membranes. J Membr Sci 2016; 498: 30–38.10.1016/j.memsci.2015.09.067Search in Google Scholar

Wei J, Qiu C, Tang CY, Wang R, Fane AG. Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 2011; 372: 292–302.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.013Search in Google Scholar

Werner CM, Logan BE, Saikaly PE, Amy GL. Wastewater treatment, energy recovery and desalination using a forward osmosis membrane in an air-cathode microbial osmotic fuel cell. J Membr Sci 2013; 428: 116–122.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.031Search in Google Scholar

Widjojo N, Chung TS, Weber M, Maletzko C, Warzelhan V. The role of sulphonated polymer and macrovoid-free structure in the support layer for thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. J Membr Sci 2011; 383: 214–223.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.041Search in Google Scholar

Widjojo N, Chung TS, Weber M, Malerzko C, Warzelhan V. A sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) as the supporting substrate in thin film composite (TFC) membranes with enhanced performance for forward osmosis (FO). Chem Eng J 2013; 220: 15–23.10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.007Search in Google Scholar

Xia QC, Wang J, Wang X, Chen BZ, Guo JL, Jia TZ, Sun SP. A hydrophilicity gradient control mechanism for fabricating delamination-free dual-layer membranes. J Membr Sci 2017; 539: 392–402.10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.021Search in Google Scholar

Xu W, Chen Q, Ge Q. Recent advances in forward osmosis (FO) membrane: chemical modifications on membranes for FO processes. Desalination 2017; 419: 101–116.10.1016/j.desal.2017.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Yang Q, Wang KY, Chung TS. A novel dual-layer forward osmosis membrane for protein enrichment and concentration. Sep Purif Technol 2009; 69: 269–274.10.1016/j.seppur.2009.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Yip NY, Tiraferri A, Phillip WA, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ Sci Technol 2010; 44: 3812–3818.10.1021/es1002555Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Yu HY, Kang Y, Liu Y, Mi B. Grafting polyzwitterions onto polyamide by click chemistry and nucleophilic substitution on nitrogen: a novel approach to enhance membrane fouling resistance. J Membr Sci 2014; 449: 50–57.10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.022Search in Google Scholar

Zhang S, Zhang Y, Chung TS. Facile preparation of antifouling hollow fiber membranes for sustainable osmotic power generation. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2016a; 4: 1154–1160.10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01228Search in Google Scholar

Zhang L, She Q, Wang R, Wongchitphimon S, Chen Y, Fane AG. Unique roles of aminosilane in developing anti-fouling thin film composite (TFC) membranes for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO). Desalination 2016b; 389: 119–128.10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.024Search in Google Scholar

Zhang YQ, Yang XB, Wang ZX, Long J, Shao L. Designing multifunctional 3D magnetic foam for effective insoluble oil separation and rapid selective dye removal for use in wastewater remediation. J Mater Chem A 2017; 5: 7316–7325.10.1039/C6TA11252HSearch in Google Scholar

Zhao S, Zou L, Tang CY, Mulcahy D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J Membr Sci 2012; 396: 1–21.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Zhao CS, Xue JM, Ran F, Sun SD. Modification of polyethersulfone membranes – a review of methods. Prog Mater Sci 2013; 58: 76–150.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Zhong P, Fu X, Chung TS, Weber M, Maletzko C. Development of thin-film composite forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes using direct sulfonated polyphenylenesulfone (sPPSU) as membrane substrates. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 7430–7436.10.1021/es4013273Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zou S, Gu YS, Xiao DZ, Tang CY. The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separation. J Membr Sci 2011; 366: 356–362.10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.030Search in Google Scholar