Abstract
In recent decades, there has been a substantial increase in the consumption of fruits and vegetables due to their nutritional properties since they are known as sources of vitamins, minerals, fiber, and antioxidants. Moreover, a substantial growth in fresh-cut fruits and vegetables has been noticed because of their ease to use; in fact changes in human life styles have led consumers to move towards ready-to-eat products. In this context, product quality must be preserved at each step of product handling, processing, and storage, and therefore rapid methods should be available to provide useful information in process management. In this review an overview of the applications of widely used non-destructive techniques, namely, electronic nose and visible/near infrared spectroscopy, for measuring quality of fruits and vegetables is presented. A brief description of spectroscopic and electronic devices and a selection of applications are provided. Future perspectives about the simplification/application of these non-destructive techniques are finally explored.
Introduction
Flavor of fruits and vegetables is influenced by genetic, pre-harvest, harvesting, and postharvest factors. The longer the time between harvest and eating, the greater are the losses of flavor and the development of off-flavor in most fruits and vegetables. Much of the harvesting and handling procedures have been based only on reducing quantitative losses by maintenance of appearance and textural quality of fruits and vegetables ( Bartz & Brecht, 2002; Kader, 2002a; Knee, 2002; Kays & Paull, 2004). It is not enough to harvest fruit with good flavor to provide high quality products, but flavor has to be maintained during storage and marketing ( Forney, 2001) because postharvest life based on flavor and nutritional properties is often shorter than that based on appearance and textural characteristics ( Kader, 2008). The stage of maturity at harvesting is one of the most important aspects to be considered, as it affects both the shelf life and the sensorial properties of a product. In recent decades, there has been a substantial increase in the consumption of fruits and vegetables, and in particular of fresh-cut or minimally processed products due to their high added value in comparison with the fresh one (5–6 times higher) ( Lamikanra, 2002). This evident growth in the consumption of ready to use fruits and vegetables is related to their ease to use and nutritional properties since they are sources of vitamins, minerals, fiber, and antioxidants ( Kader, 2002b). Fresh-cut fruits are more difficult to preserve than other minimally processed products because some of them have to be completely ripe before processing ( Gorny et al., 2000). Damages caused by mechanical operations on the tissues of fresh-cut fruit is influenced by the state of maturity of the processed fruit. The optimal stage of processing to minimize cutting damage also varies greatly, depending on the species, cultivar and multiple crop, harvest, and postharvest conditions ( Corbo et al., 2010). By sorting harvested products according to their maturity, it is possible to split immature-green, partially mature, and fully mature products, in order to obtain the uniformity of lots at destination. Thus, the assessment of the maturity stage is of great importance for determining the optimal postharvest strategy for product handling and marketing ( Slaughter, 2009). The maturity stage can be evaluated by biological (respiration rate), physical (color, texture), physico-chemical, microbiological, and nutritional parameters ( Aguayo & Silveira, 2008; Kader, 2008; Rico et al., 2007; Soliva-Fortuny & Martin-Belloso, 2003). In addition, the same parameters are also studied to monitor and extend the shelf life of fruits and vegetables. However, these conventional analytical methods are generally expensive, time consuming, require sample pre-treatment, and are unsuitable for on-line monitoring or for automation. Thus, the application of visible/infrared spectroscopy and electronic nose as rapid and non-destructive analytical techniques could be useful for more efficient fruit and vegetable analysis to replace conventional methods. Moreover, electronic nose and visible/infrared spectroscopy could be considered complementary, and their combined application could provide rapid information about the appearance, the chemical composition, and the aromatic profile of the product.
Spectroscopy has been developed considerably over the years ( Guidetti, Beghi & Giovenzana, 2012; Nicolaï et al., 2007) reaching a mature stage. Their applicability for the evaluation of agro-food products has widely been proven. Visible and near infrared (vis/NIR) spectroscopy fulfill all the requirements for continuous monitoring of compounds that can be related to the taste and nutritional value of the products. Nevertheless, these technologies are currently adopted mainly by research centers or big companies equipped with laboratories and trained personnel, due to their cost and complexity of use. A simplification of these technologies is necessary to make them accessible also to operative staff in small and medium enterprises. The sector is therefore interested in new simplified systems and low-cost compact tools in view of their application at different levels of the supply chain, with a real possibility of wide diffusion of these technologies from the manufacturing process up to the point of sale and to the consumer. For a simplification and a greater diffusion of these non-destructive techniques, in recent years, interest has shifted towards the development of portable systems usable in pre- and post-harvest ( Temma, Hanamatsu & Shinoki, 2002; Walsh, Guthrie & Burney, 2000; Zude et al., 2006). Chemometrics can be applied for the selection of a small number of relevant variables representing the most useful information contained in the full spectra ( Sun, 2010; Xiaobo et al., 2010).
Another of the most promising directions for the development of rapid, low-cost, and non-destructive methods is the application of sensor systems, whose speed and on-line capabilities meet the demand of automation. The electronic nose (e-nose) is a technological attempt to mimic the human sense of smell. This device consists of an array of weakly specific and broad-spectrum chemical sensors providing a digital fingerprint of the volatiles present in the sample headspace ( Gardner & Bartlett, 1993). Furthermore, the e-nose is a portable device that can be applied directly in the orchard or in the packinghouse and retail store.
This review examines the advances on e-nose and vis/NIR and NIR (NIRs) spectroscopy and their applications for quality evaluation and shelf life assessment of fruits and vegetables. In the first part, the two devices are described in detail; in the second part, an overview of the recent applications on fruits and vegetables is reported, then the future perspectives in the implementation and application of these two devices are considered.
Instrumentation
Electronic nose
At the beginning of the 1990s the term “artificial” or “electronic” nose appeared. More extended research began, and applications, especially in food industry, developed. Gardner and Bartlett (1993) defined the electronic nose as “an instrument, which comprises an array of electronic chemical sensors with partial specificity and appropriate pattern-recognition system, capable of recognising simple or complex odours”.
Principle
The key principle involved in the e-nose system is the transfer of the sample headspace on an array of sensors able to provide signals that are dependent on sensors selectivity and sensitivity and on the volatile compounds present in the sample headspace ( Gardner & Bartlett, 1993).
There are striking analogies between the human and electronic noses, and comparing the two is instructive ( Pearce et al., 2003). The human nose uses the lungs to bring the odor to the epithelium layer; the e-nose has a pump. The human nose contains the olfactory epithelium, which has millions of sensing cells that interact with the odorous molecules; the e-nose has a sensor array that interacts with the sample headspace. The human receptors convert the chemical responses to electronic nerve impulses that are propagated by neurons through a complex network before reaching the higher brain for interpretation; similarly, the e-nose chemical sensors produce electrical signals that are acquired by a computer and elaborated by pattern recognition algorithms in order to identify and classify odors (Figure 1).

Schematic representation illustrating the principle of human nose and electronic nose.
The electronic nose is sensitive to a large number of aromatic compounds by using limited number of non-specific or semi-specific chemical sensors with different and partly overlapping selectivity, able to detect classes of volatile compound in sample headspace.
Compared to the human nose, the e-nose is faster, not influenced by environmental factors, provides reproducible response, and often is more sensitive.
E-nose technologies
The heart of the system is represented by the sensors that respond reversibly to volatile compounds, generating electrical signals that are immediately acquired by a computer and elaborated by multivariate statistical analysis. The combination of sensor signals defines the odor fingerprint typical of the analyzed product.
Different gas sensor technologies are available, but only four technologies are currently used in the commercial e-noses: metal oxide semiconductors (MOS), metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFET), conducting organic polymers (CP), and piezoelectric crystals (quartz crystal microbalance – QCM).
MOS were the first commercially used in the 1960s as household gas alarms in Japan under names of Taguchi (the inventor) or Figaro (the company’s name). These sensors rely on changes of resistance induced by the adsorption of gases and subsequent surface reactions ( Kohl, 1992). They consist of a ceramic substrate (round or flat) heated by wire and coated by a metal oxide semiconducting film. The metal oxide coating may be either of the n-type (mainly tin dioxide, zinc oxide, titanium dioxide, or iron oxide), which responds to oxidizing compounds, or of the p-type (mainly cobalt oxide or nickel oxide) which responds to reducing compounds ( Mielle, 1996). Due to the high operating temperature (200–650°C), the organic volatiles transferred on the sensor surface are totally combusted to carbon dioxide and water, leading to the change in resistance.
MOSFET sensors rely on a change of electrostatic potential. A MOSFET sensor comprises three layers, a silicon semiconductor, a silicon oxide insulator, and a catalytic metal (usually palladium, platinum, iridium, or rhodium), also called the gate. When polar compounds interact with the metal gate, the electric field and the current flowing through the sensor are modified. The recorded response corresponds to the change of voltage necessary to keep a constant pre-set current ( Lundstrom et al., 1990). The selectivity and sensitivity of MOSFET sensors may be influenced by the operating temperature (50–200°C), the composition of the metal gate, and the microstructure of the catalytic metal. MOSFET sensors have a relatively low sensitivity to moisture and are very robust.
CP sensors are based on changes of resistance by adsorption of gas. These sensors comprise a substrate (such as a fiber-glass or silicon), a pair of gold-plated electrodes, and a conducting organic polymer such as polypyrrol, polyaniline, or polythiophene as sensing element ( Amrani, Persaud & Payne, 1995). The transfer of volatile compounds on the sensor surface alters the electron flow and therefore the resistance of the sensor. CP sensors show a good sensitivity especially for polar compounds; however, their low operating temperature (<50°C) makes them extremely sensitive to humidity.
Among the piezoelectric sensors, the QCM are widely used, and they are based on change of mass, which may be measured as a change in resonance frequency. These sensors are made of tiny discs, usually quartz, lithium niobate (LiNbO3), or lithium tantalite (LiTaO3), coated with materials such as chromatographic stationary phases, lipids, or non-volatile compounds that are chemically and thermally stable ( Guilbault & Jordan, 1988). When an alternating electrical potential is applied at room temperature, the crystal vibrates at a very stable frequency, defined by its mechanical properties. Upon exposure to volatile compounds, the coating adsorbs molecules, increasing the mass of the sensing layer and hence decreasing the resonance frequency of the crystal. These devices are called QCM because, similar to a balance, their responses change in proportion to the amount of mass adsorbed. Since piezoelectric sensors may be coated with an unlimited number of materials, they have the best selectivity. However, the coating technology is not yet well controlled inducing poor batch-to-batch reproducibility.
Vis/NIR and NIR spectroscopy
Among the non-destructive techniques, the spectroscopic analyses in the region of NIRs have a significant role. Instruments for NIRs analysis were built since 1970s, and since the second half of 1980s instruments capable to acquire simultaneously the sample spectrum in a specific interval of wavelength were introduced, recording the average spectrum of a single defined sample area (diode array systems and Fourier transform NIR spectroscopy (FT-NIR) instruments) ( Stark & Luchter, 2003).
Principle
The NIRs spectroscopy is used to acquire information about the nature of the functional groups present in a molecule, by exploiting the interaction between the light and the structure of a sample. The radiation from the NIRs regions is in fact able to promote transitions at the vibrational level. Visible (400–780 nm) and NIR (780–2500 nm) spectra are composed of combination and overtone bands that are related to absorption frequencies in the mid-infrared region (2,500–50,000 nm). These combination and overtone bands correspond to the frequencies of vibrations between the bonds of the atoms making up the material. Because each different material is a unique combination of atoms, no two compounds produce the same vis/NIR spectra. With suitable algorithms and statistical analysis (chemometrics), NIRs spectroscopy is an excellent tool for quantitative analysis. In most case-studies, NIRs techniques do not require sample preparation, offering a practical alternative to time-consuming analytical methods (chemical and physical), and could be capable to analyze samples through glass and packaging materials. Thus, the agro-food sector has demonstrated interest towards NIRs technology for measuring quality parameters, also along the minimally processed fruit and vegetable chain. NIRs techniques have been applied to a wide range of agri-food applications, and the feasibility of NIRs spectroscopy to measure quality attributes of fruits and vegetables has been shown for many products ( Nicolaï et al., 2007). Data complexity arising from NIRs requires specific statistical analyses and qualified operators.
During fruit ripening biochemical changes occur at skin level and also in the pulp, and these changes are rather homogeneous for the whole fruit. NIRs analyses allow to measure only in a limited area of the sample and are able to reach the inner layers of the sample when appropriate wavebands are used.
Several types of NIRs applications have been developed for non-destructive measurement of the internal composition of fruits and vegetables, with specific acquisition setups. Reflectance measurements are generally preferred for these products and are made using a fiber optic probe in contact with the sample. This setup allows light absorbance measurements to be made through a portion of the sample, typically at depths of a few millimeters, depending upon wavelengths range and skin thickness ( Lammertyn et al., 2000).
The devices
Three main types of NIRs devices can be identified: (i) laboratory instruments for applications in research centers or in industry laboratories, (ii) sorting and grading devices designed specifically for the fruit and vegetable industries, e.g. in warehouses, and (iii) portable devices for the use also directly in the field. Table 1 shows the main differences between the three types of NIRs devices.
Characteristics of the three main categories of NIRs devices.
Instrument type | Application area | Flexibility of use | Applicability | Measurement accuracy and reproducibility | Cost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Laboratory devices | Research/industry | Adaptable to different matrices | Fixed system | Optimal | Average/high |
Sorting and grading | Industry | Specific categories of products | Fixed system | Fair | Average/high |
Portable devices | Also in field | Dedicated for individual products | Portable/handheld | Fair | Average |
There is an increasing demand of NIRs portable devices, so more research is required in this area. The availability of handheld spectrophotometers has opened up the possibility of using them in the orchard for monitoring the fruit ripeness and quality.
Both in the case of portable and stationary instruments, the fundamental components of these systems are common, and there are five: (i) light source, (ii) light radiation transport system, (iii) sample compartment and measurement zone, (iv) spectrophotometer sensor, and (v) electronic hardware.
NIRs devices have been recently developed with attention to their simplification, by integrating user-friendly software for statistical processing and partial automation of analysis, with the aim to fit less skilful users.
Data analysis
Chemometric is an essential tool for the elaboration of e-nose and NIRs spectroscopy data. Multivariate statistical analysis is necessary to extrapolate useful information present in the data matrices, splitting not useful information and data noise.
The statistical techniques applied to multivariate output data generated by the sensor array signals are based on commercial or specially designed software using multivariate calibration and classification methods like principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), cluster analysis (CA), artificial neural network (ANN), partial least squares (PLS) regression, and multilinear regression (MLR).
PCA is a procedure that permits to extract useful information from the data, to explore the data structure, the relationship between objects, the relationship between objects and variables, and the global correlation of variables. It identifies orthogonal directions of maximum variance in the original data and projects the data into a lower-dimensionality space formed of a subset of the highest-variance components. The orthogonal directions are linear combinations (principal components) of the original variables, and each component explains a part of the total variance of the data ( Beebe, Pell & Seasholtz, 1998).
LDA is one of the mostly applied classification techniques. The method maximizes the variance between categories and minimizes the variance within categories. This method renders a number of orthogonal linear discriminant functions equal to the number of categories minus one ( Meloun, Militky & Forina, 1992).
CA performs agglomerative hierarchical clustering of objects based on distance measures of dissimilarity or similarity. The hierarchy of clusters can be represented by a binary tree, called dendrogram. A final partition, i.e. the cluster assignment of each object, is obtained by cutting the tree at a specified level ( Gardner & Bartlett, 1992).
The ANN are very sophisticated modeling techniques able to model extremely complex functions ( Benedetti et al., 2004). The basic unit of an ANN is the neuron. A neural network consists of a set of interconnected network of neurons. The input layer has one neuron for each of the sensor signals, while the output layer has one neuron for each of different sample properties that should be predicted. Usually one hidden layer with a variable number of neurons is placed between the input and the output layers.
During the ANN training phase, the weights and transfer function parameters are adjusted such that the calculated output values for a set of input values are so close as possible to the unknown true values of the sample properties. The model estimation is more complex than for a linear regression model due to the non-linearity of the model ( Principe, Euliano & Lefebvre, 2000).
The PLS regression analysis is widely employed to obtain quantitative prediction of the parameters of interest. In PLS regression, an orthogonal basis of latent variables is constructed one by one in such a way that they are oriented along directions of maximal covariance between spectral matrix X and response vector Y. This method ensures that the latent variables are ordered according to their relevance for predicting the Y variable. Interpretation of the relationship between the X data and the Y data (the regression model) is then simplified, as this relationship is concentrated on the smallest possible number of latent variables. The PLS method performs particularly well when the various X variables express common information, i.e. when there is a large amount of correlation, or even collinearity, which is the case for spectral data ( Guidetti, Beghi & Bodria, 2010).
Based on PLS algorithm, a classification model could be also calculated (PLS discriminant analysis, PLS-DA). The objective of PLS-DA is to find models that allow the maximum separation among classes of objects ( Wold, Sjöström & Eriksson, 2001). PLS-DA accomplishes a rotation of the projection to latent variables focusing on class separation. A matrix of artificial (dummy) variables, assuming a discrete numerical value (0 or 1), was used as Y data. The Y dummy matrix was constructed so that the value of the objects belonging to the class was 1, and the value of all other objects was 0 ( Musumarra, Condorelli & Fortuna, 2011).
Moreover, starting from regression coefficients obtained by the PLS model, a variables selection procedure could be envisaged (regression coefficient analysis, RCA). High absolute values of the coefficients indicate the importance and the significance of the effect on the prediction of Y variable ( Liu, Jiang & He, 2009).
This procedure could be used for the selection of a limited number of effective variables and can be coupled with the MLR method, which allows to develop models using only a few important variables, to test the effectiveness of the selected wavelengths ( Fernández-Novales et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2010). In fact, MLR technique is well suited when the number of variables is less than the number of samples and is not affected by collinearity ( Naes et al., 2002).
In order to assess the accuracy of the calibration model and to avoid overfitting, validation procedures have to be applied. Leverage correction is an equation-based procedure to estimate the prediction accuracy without performing any prediction and is to be avoided at all times because it always leads to overoptimistic estimates. In leave-one-out cross validation, one sample is removed from the data set, and a calibration model is constructed for the remaining subset. The removed samples are then used to calculate the prediction residual. The process is repeated with other subsets until every sample has been left out once, and in the end the variance of all prediction residuals is estimated. In multifold cross validation, a well-defined number of samples (“segment”) are left out instead of one. In internal validation, the data set is split into a calibration set and a validation set. The calibration model is constructed using the calibration set, and the prediction residuals are then calculated by applying the calibration model to the validation set. In external validation, the validation data set is independent and is, for example, obtained from a different orchard or different season ( Esbensen & Geladi, 2010). To evaluate model accuracy, the statistic parameters usually considered are as follows: the coefficient of determination in calibration (R2cal), the coefficient of determination in prediction (R2pred), the root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC), and the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) ( Guidetti, Beghi & Bodria, 2010). Prediction capability of a model can be evaluated with the ratio performance deviation (RPD), which is defined as the ratio between the standard deviation of the response variable and the RMSEP. RPD showing values <1.5 mean that calibration is not usable; between 1.5 and 2.0 allow to distinguish high and low values; between 2.0 and 2.5 approximate quantitative predictions it is possible; and finally, RPD values >2.5 and >3.0 identify models with a good and excellent prediction accuracy, respectively ( Williams & Sobering, 1996). Ratio error range (RER) value could be also calculated for the evaluation of model performance. The RER is the ratio of the range in reference values of the validation samples divided by the RMSEP. Williams and Sobering (1996) suggest that the RER value should be 10 or higher.
The large number of spectral variables in most data sets often results in an unreliable prediction of the dependent variable. Chemometrics can be used for the selection of a small number of relevant variables, which represent the most useful information contained in the full spectra. In order to extract this useful information from the NIRs spectra, different variable selection methods could be performed ( Chong & Jun, 2005; Xiaobo et al., 2010; Mehmood et al., 2012). In this way the spectral noise and the variables containing redundant information can be eliminated, and the sampling time of each spectrum could be reduced. However, variables selection may not always lead to better predictive results. For instance, a variable that is completely useless by itself can provide a significant improvement in performance when taken in combination with others ( Xiaobo et al., 2010).
Electronic nose applications
Aroma is the most important characteristic determining fruit and vegetable quality and consumer’s choice. In this contest, e-nose is a useful device for identifying, characterizing, and grading fruits and vegetables of different cultivars and varieties, since this instrument is able to rapidly and consistently evaluate simple and complex volatile mixtures without identifying all of the chemical compounds present in the sample headspace but considering the total odor fingerprint of the product ( Wilson, 2013).
In agriculture, e-nose is widely used for quality evaluation, process monitoring, and detection of crop diseases ( Li et al., 2010). A review of e-nose applications on fruits and vegetables from 2000 up to 2016 is shown in Table 2. Works are grouped considering four general aims: (i) ripeness evaluation, (ii) shelf life assessment of fresh and ready to eat products, (iii) defect and disease detection, and (iv) process monitoring. Moreover, in Table 2 are reported the sensors applied in commercial and in prototype e-noses and the specific aim of each referred work.
Overview of applications of electronic nose on fruit and vegetables.
E-nose application | Common name | Species | Specific aim | Sensors | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ripeness evaluation | Apple | Malus domestica Borkh. | Cultivar discrimination and prediction of the optimal harvest date | QMB (Libra Nose) | Saevels et al. (2003) |
Apple | M. domestica Borkh. | Quality indices assessment and maturity evaluation | CPs (Cyranose 320) | Pathange et al. (2006) | |
Apple, pear and peach | Fruit ripeness monitoring | MOS (Prototype) | Brezmes et al. (2000) | ||
Mandarin | Citrus reticulata | Maturity monitoring | MOS (PEN 2) | Gómez et al. (2006b) | |
Mandarin and orange | Citrus unshiu and Citrus sinensis | Quality detection | MOS (PEN 2) | Qiu and Wang (2015) | |
Peach and nectarine | Prunus persica | Sensorial properties investigation | QMB (Libra Nose) | Di Natale et al. (2001a) | |
Peach | P. persica | Cultivar discrimination and quality assessment | QMB (Libra Nose) | Di Natale et al. (2002) | |
Peach | P. persica | Quality indices evaluation | MOS (Prototype) | Zhang et al. (2008a) | |
Nectarine and peach | P. persica | Cultivar discrimination and quality evaluation | MOS (EOS 835) | Infante et al. (2011) | |
Peach | P. persica | Quality indices prediction | MOS (Prototype) | Zhang et al. (2012) | |
Peach and nectarine | P. persica | Prediction of harvest time and quality assessment | MOS (FOX 4000) | Su et al. (2013) | |
Mango | Mangifera indica | Maturity assessment | MOS (FOX 4000) | Lebrun et al. (2008) | |
Mango | M. indica | Maturity assessment | CPs (Cyranose 320) | Zakaria et al. (2012) | |
Apricot | Prunus armeniaca | Cultivar discrimination | MOS (FOX 4000) | Solis-Solis et al. (2007) | |
Apricot | P. armeniaca | Cultivar discrimination | MOS (PEN 2) | Parpinello et al. (2007) | |
Pear | Quality indices prediction | QMB (Prototype) | Zhang, Wang, and Ye (2008b) | ||
Cherry | Prunus avium | Cultivar discrimination and ripeness evaluation | MOS (PEN 2) | Benedetti et al. (2010) | |
Tomato | Lycopersicum esculentum | Maturity assessment | MOS (PEN 2) | Gómez et al. (2006a) | |
Spring onion | Allium spp. | Quality evaluation | CPs (AromaScan) | Abbey et al. (2005) | |
Garlic | Allium sativum L. | Cultivar discrimination | MOS and QMB (Prototype) | Trirongjitmoah et al. (2015) | |
Shelf life assessment of fresh products | Apple | M. domestica Borkh. | Storage time prediction | MOS (Prototype) | Guohua et al. (2013) |
Apple | Malus sylvestris | Quality assessment during shelf life | QMB (Libra Nose) | Saevels et al. (2004) | |
Apple | M. domestica Borkh. | Shelf life evaluation | MOS (Prototype) | Brezmes et al. (2001) | |
Mandarin | C. reticulata | Shelf life evaluation | MOS (PEN 2) | Gómez et al. (2007) | |
Peach | P. persica | Cultivar discrimination and shelf life evaluation | MOS (PEN 2) | Benedetti et al. (2008) | |
Peach | P. persica | Sensorial quality and aroma monitoring during cold storage | MOS (EOS 835) | Infante, Farcuh, and Meneses (2008) | |
Peach | P. persica | Shelf life evaluation | MOS (FOX 4000) | Zhang et al. (2011) | |
Peach | P. persica | Freshness prediction | MOS and QMB (Prototype) | Guohua et al. (2012) | |
Peach | P. persica | Quality changes during cold storage | MOS (PEN 3) | Rizzolo et al. (2013) | |
Banana | Musa acuminata | Quality assessment | MOS (Prototype) | Sanaeifar et al. (2016) | |
Apricot | P. armeniaca | Aroma evolution during storage | MOS (EOS 835) | Defilippi et al. (2009) | |
Pear | Pyrus communis | Odor discrimination | CPs (AromaScan) | Oshita et al. (2000) | |
Tomato | L. esculentum | Cultivar discrimination and shelf life evaluation | QMB (Libra Nose) | Berna et al. (2004) | |
Tomato | L. esculentum | Cultivar discrimination and shelf life evaluation | QMB (Prototype) | Berna et al. (2005) | |
Tomato | L. esculentum | Shelf life evaluation | MOS (PEN 2) | Gómez et al. (2008) | |
Tomato | L. esculentum | Quality assessment | MOS (EN-MS Alpha Prometheus) | Messina et al. (2012) | |
Shelf life assessment of ready to eat products | Apple | M. domestica Borkh. | Quality and shelf life of fresh cut slices | MOS (Fox 4000) | Bai et al. (2004) |
Apple | Malus communis | Shelf life of fresh cut slices | MOS (PEN 2) | Siroli et al. (2014) | |
Apple | Shelf life modeling of fresh cut slices | MOS (PEN 3) | Correa, Quicazan, and Hernandez (2015) | ||
Pineapple | Ananas comosus | Shelf life evaluation of fresh cut fruit | MOS (PEN 2) | Torri, Sinelli, and Limbo (2010) | |
Cicorino and carrot | Cichorium Intybus and Daucus carota L. | Shelf life evaluation | MOS and MOSFET (NST 3220) | Riva, Benedetti, and Mannino (2001) | |
Iceberg lettuce | Lactuca sativa L. | Shelf life evaluation | MOS (FOX 3000) | Odumeru et al. (2003) | |
Valerianella | V. locusta L. | Shelf life evaluation | MOS (PEN 2) | Giovenzana et al. (2014a) | |
Defects and diseases detection | Apple | M. domestica Borkh. | Defect detection | CPs (Cyranose 320) | Li, Heinemann, and Sherry (2007) |
Apple and orange | M. domestica Borkh. | Defect detection and quality evaluation | QMB (Prototype of Libra Nose) | Di Natale et al. (2001b) | |
Orange | C. sinensis | Fungal infection evaluation | QMB (Libra Nose) | Pallottino et al. (2012) | |
Blueberry | Vaccinus virgatum | Disease detection and classification | CPs (Cyranose 320) | Li et al. (2010) | |
Blueberry | V. virgatum | Mechanical injury effect | CPs (EN 4000) | Demir et al. (2011) | |
Strawberry | Fragaria x ananassa | Fungal disease detection and classification | MOS (PEN 3) | Pan et al. (2014) | |
Tomato | L. esculentum | Microbial contamination detection | MOS (EOS 835) | Concina et al. (2009) | |
Cherry Tomato | L. esculentum | Treatment to prevent fungal infection | MOS (PEN 3) | Zhao et al. (2010) | |
Onion | Allium cepa L. | Disease detection | CPs (Prototype) | Li, Schmidt, and Gitaitis (2011) | |
Onion | cepa L. | Quality evaluation | MOS (Prototype) | Konduru, Rains, and Li (2015a) | |
Onion | cepa L. | Disease evaluation | MOS (Prototype) | Konduru, Rains, and Li (2015b) | |
Potato | Solanum tuberosum L. | Bacterial disease detection | MOS (Prototype) | de Lacy Costello et al. (2000) | |
Potato | S. tuberosum L. | Bacterial disease detection | MOS (PEN 3) | Biondi et al. (2014) | |
Potato | S. tuberosum L. | Bacterial disease detection | MOS (FOX 3000) | Rutolo et al. (2016) | |
Process monitoring | Grape | V. vinifera L. | Post-harvest dehydration study | QMB (Prototype) | Santonico et al. (2010) |
Grape | V. vinifera L. | Off-vine dehydration time | QMB (Prototype) | Lopez de Lerma et al. (2012) | |
Grape | V. vinifera L. | Determination of sun-drying time | QMB (Prototype) | Lopez de Lerma, Moreno, and Peinado (2014) | |
Strawberry | Fragaria x ananassa | Osmotic dehydration treatment | MOS (PEN 2) | Buratti et al. (2006) | |
Tomato | L. esculentum | Osmotic dehydration treatment | MOS (PEN 2) | Pani et al. (2008) |
Ripeness evaluation
The assessment of ripeness is an important part of quality evaluation since maturity at harvest can have an effect on sensory and storage properties of fruits and vegetables. Harvesting fruit at an optimal physiological condition assures good quality by enouncing a number of characteristics such as extended shelf life, slower rate of decline in firmness, acidity, and color. Many methods to monitor fruit ripeness have been proposed, but the majority of these are not practical and require the destruction of the sample ( Christensen, 1983; Wang, Teng & Yu, 2004). This is why, nowadays, prediction of ripening stage is mainly based on practical experience or visual parameters such as color changes. An alternative strategy to determine the maturity level consists in the evaluation of volatiles emitted by fruit during ripening. In literature, there are several works concerning changes in volatile composition during ripening, investigated by gas chromatography (GC) with headspace sampling, and GC combined with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) ( Boudhrioua, Giampaoli & Bonazzi, 2003; Lavilla et al., 2002; Plutowska & Wardencki, 2007). These methods are not normally used to assess maturity since they are difficult to undertake and require expensive devices. Furthermore, the high number of volatiles prevents a simple interpretation of results, and, even considering only the major volatile compounds, a skilled analyst is still required. Thus, there is a need to develop analytical methods for the evaluation of optimal harvest date of fruits eventually even on trees, and the e-nose could be a useful tool since it is easy to use, portable, non-destructive, and rapid.
The e-nose has been successfully used in monitoring aroma changes during ripening of climacteric fruits such as apple ( Brezmes et al., 2000; Pathange et al., 2006; Saevels et al., 2003), peach ( Brezmes et al., 2000; Di Natale et al. 2001a; 2002; Infante et al., 2011; Su et al., 2013; Zhang et al. 2008a; 2012), mango ( Lebrun et al., 2008; Zakaria et al., 2012), pear ( Brezmes et al., 2000), apricot ( Parpinello et al., 2007), and tomato ( Gómez et al., 2006a), while there is less information about the e-nose application on non-climacteric fruits such as cherry ( Benedetti et al., 2010), mandarin ( Gómez et al., 2006b; Qiu & Wang, 2015), and orange ( Qiu & Wang, 2015). Moreover, in some of these papers e-nose was also applied to cultivar discrimination and classification. In the work of Saevels et al. (2003) e-nose has been evaluated to predict the optimal harvest data of apples by considering also the cultivar effects; Di Natale et al. (2002) illustrated a study aimed to evaluate the improvement derived by the fusion of visible spectra and e-nose data. The experiments were performed on yellow peaches belonging to two cultivars, and data collected were analyzed individually and then fused together in order to classify the two cultivars and estimate reference parameters (texture measurement, soluble solid content (SSC), and pigment evaluation). In the work of Infante et al. (2011) e-nose was applied to predict the quality of four nectarines and one peach cultivar. On each cultivar, quality indices (flesh firmness, fruit weight, titratable acidity (TA), and ground color) were measured, and sensory analysis was performed; the results of MLR indicated that three sensory attributes (acidity, acceptability, and sweetness) and one e-nose sensor (S6–SnO2, RGTO Mo, 45 Å) were the main variables that best related to the aroma of the evaluated cultivars. Solis-Solis et al. (2007) applied the e-nose to discriminate eight apricot varieties, then in a second step, eight aromatic compounds (hexanol, limonene, 2-hexenal, 6-metil-5-hepten-2-one, linaloon, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadiene, β-ionone, and γ-decalactone) identified by GC-MS were recognized to be useful for the classification of the varieties. Similarly, Parpinello et al. (2007) applied the e-nose to analyze the headspace of 10 different apricot cultivars, and, by the application of a single hidden layer ANN with 35 neurons, a correlation index higher than 80% on test data set was achieved.
E-nose was applied on sweet cherries to assess the differences among four cultivars and to evaluate their ripening stage ( Benedetti et al., 2010). In this work, CA was applied on maturity indices (color, TA, and total soluble solids) in order to categorize cherries into three clusters on the basis of their maturity level, then LDA was performed on e-nose data in order to categorize fruit into the three ripeness stages, and a correct classification percentage of about 95% was obtained.
Two works concern cultivar and genotype discrimination of vegetable products: Abbey et al. (2005) investigated the use of an e-nose to discriminate among eight spring onion genotypes and to evaluate the effect of sulfur nutrition and soil type on headspace volatile compounds, considering also the interaction between these factors; Trirongjitmoah et al. (2015) developed an e-nose method to classify garlic cultivars, and the performance of the e-nose system was confirmed by GC-MS analysis. These studies demonstrate the e-nose ability to discriminate among garlic cultivars and onion genotypes in relation to variations in growing conditions.
Shelf life assessment
Since the most important changes in fruit are experienced during the shelf life period, it is important to monitor the ripening process from harvest until consumption. Traditionally, shelf life is assessed by the evaluation of chemical and physical properties; firmness, color, SSC, and TA are the parameters commonly used by researchers and industry to evaluate fruit shelf life. For the consumers, aroma is an important aspect in defining fruit quality. Thus, measuring and evaluating post-harvest decay of fruits and vegetables through the evaluation of changes in volatile compounds by e-nose is market-oriented. In literature there are several studies reporting the e-nose application to assess the shelf life of fresh fruits evaluated at room temperature ( Benedetti et al., 2008; Berna et al. 2004; 2005; Brezmes et al., 2001; Gómez et al., 2008; Guohua et al. 2012; 2013; Messina et al., 2012) or during cold storage ( Defilippi et al., 2009; Gómez et al., 2007; Infante, Farcuh & Meneses, 2008; Oshita et al., 2000; Rizzolo et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2011). In some works, the aroma development during fruit storage was also evaluated by GC-MS analysis ( Berna et al. 2004; 2005; Defilippi et al., 2009; Guohua et al., 2012; Oshita et al., 2000; Rizzolo et al., 2013; Saevels et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2011). In the paper of Saevels et al. (2004) a commercial e-nose and a mass spectrometry e-nose (MSE-nose), based on GC/MS measurements without separation of volatiles, were applied in combination in order to monitor changes in volatile profile of apples during shelf life. E-nose and MSE-nose data were used to build PLS calibration models for firmness and for the number of days in shelf life. The model for firmness based on MSE-nose data had a high correlation between predicted and measured values, while e-nose measurements contained information about the number of days in shelf life.
Peaches are climacteric and particularly perishable during storage; in the work of Benedetti et al. (2008) e-nose data collected on peaches from harvest until senescent were elaborated by PCA, and the loading analysis identified one MOS sensor (W5S) as the most relevant in the discrimination of fruit on the bases of their shelf life. The sensor responses were plotted against time and fitted with sigmoid transition function allowing the definition of the ripening stages based on first and second derivative trends. Classification and regression tree analysis was applied to classify peach samples into three defined ripening stages: unripe, ripe, and over-ripe.
Sanaeifar et al. (2016) applied a low-cost MOS-based e-nose to predict banana quality indices such as total soluble solids, TA, pH, and firmness during 4 days storage at different temperatures (20, 18, and 11°C). PLS, MLR, and support vector regression (SVR) techniques were applied. All models for firmness and total soluble solids showed a good prediction performance; however, for TA and pH there were a poor correlation with the signals of e-nose in MLR and PLS models. The results proved that the performance of SVR models for the prediction of quality indices of banana were better than the others.
Many researches have been carried out to monitor and extend the shelf life of ready to eat fruits and vegetables. The degradation of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables is a complex process concerning both microbial spoilage and physico-chemical and biochemical modifications that mainly affect the sensorial properties, like appearance and flavor. It is well known that aging affects the flavor characteristics by producing off-odors due to bacterial activity or to anoxic conditions that limit the shelf life of fresh-cut products ( Rico et al., 2007). In literature there are some works about the application of e-nose in monitoring changes in volatile compounds of fresh-cut fruits ( Bai et al., 2004; Correa, Quicazan & Hernandez, 2015; Siroli et al., 2014; Torri, Sinelli & Limbo, 2010) and vegetables ( Giovenzana et al., 2014a; Odumeru et al., 2003; Riva, Benedetti & Mannino, 2001) during storage. Siroli et al. (2014) applied a commercial e-nose to evaluate changes in the aromatic profile of fresh-cut apple slices, packaged in modified atmospheres and treated with natural antimicrobials such as hexanal, citral, 2-(E)-hexenal, citron EO, and carvacrol, alone or in combination, to prolong their shelf life. By PCA analysis the e-nose data grouped samples on the basis of their storage time showing that the olfactory profiles perceived by the instrument were quite unaffected by the added antimicrobials. Torri, Sinelli, and Limbo (2010) used the e-nose in order to monitor the changes in volatile compounds of minimally process fresh-cut pineapple during storage at different temperatures. Riva, Benedetti, and Mannino (2001) applied an e-nose equipped with MOSFET and MOS sensors to evaluate the shelf life of fresh-cut “cicorino” and carrots. The results of these works showed the effectiveness of e-nose in modeling the aroma change of fresh-cut products as a function of storage time and temperature.
An e-nose was employed by Giovenzana et al. (2014a) to investigate the applicability in monitoring the shelf life of fresh-cut Valerianella locusta L. at different temperatures. Quality indices such as pH, water content, total phenols, and chlorophyll were evaluated, and the results were elaborated by CA in order to categorize Valerianella samples according to their freshness; four main groups were identified as “fresh”, “acceptable”, “spoiled”, and “very spoiled”. A LDA model was developed to test the performance of e-nose to classify samples into four classes of freshness. Results demonstrated that e-nose was able to support the conventional methods in shelf life assessment providing useful information for a better management of the product along the distribution chain.
Defects and diseases detection
Safety and quality of food products is currently one of the topics of interest to the consumer, and the ability to recognize the presence of deteriorated products during storage or packaging is certainly desirable. Damaged or deteriorated fruits and vegetables are often characterized by off-flavor, and they can have negative implications on consumer’s health. According to recent studies, the e-nose can be a useful tool to monitor in a simple and rapid way the presence of internal defects and diseases in fruits such as apple ( Di Natale et al., 2001b; Li, Heinemann & Sherry, 2007), orange ( Di Natale et al., 2001b; Pallottino et al., 2012), blueberry ( Demir et al., 2011; Li et al., 2010), strawberry ( Pan et al., 2014), and tomato ( Concina et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2010) and vegetables such as onion ( Konduru, Rains & Li 2015a; 2015b; Li, Schmidt & Gitaitis, 2011) and potato ( Biondi et al., 2014; de Lacy Costello et al., 2000; Rutolo et al., 2016).
Di Natale et al. (2001b) measured the quality of post-harvest apples and oranges by using e-nose technology as a promising application for defects detection. Defects due to post-harvest treatment are particularly important, and among them mealiness (due to post-harvest overripening), skin damage (due to mechanical or temperature stresses), and infections affect strongly the consumer’s perception. In this paper changes of orange and apple aroma due to the presence of mealiness and skin damage were evaluated by thickness shear mode quartz resonators-based e-nose. Results evidenced that in the case of oranges the e-nose was able to measure the aroma evolution occurring during a storage period of 1 month; in the case of apples e-nose was able to detect defect induced by post-harvest overripening (mealiness) and skin damage (such as cuts). A qualitative analysis by PLS-DA showed that the increase of mealiness does not change the nature of volatile compounds but their concentration; in skin cuts the oxidation process produced different compounds in the headspace.
E-nose was applied for the detection of Penicillum digitatum in Valencia oranges ( Pallottino et al., 2012). Three hundred oranges were analyzed and the collected results screened by PLS-DA in order to investigate whether the e-nose could distinguish between infected and non-infected samples. Highest percentages of correct classification (100%) were obtained at low level of infection (2–5% infection in an independent test).
A conducting polymer sensor array was applied for detecting and classifying three common post-harvest diseases of blueberry fruit: gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea, anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, and Alternaria rot caused by Alternaria sp. ( Li et al., 2010). PCA of volatile profiles revealed distinct groups corresponding to the inoculated diseases; CA identified two clusters of non-inoculated fruits (control cluster) and inoculated fruits (pathogen cluster); GC-MS was used to characterize volatile compounds of inoculated blueberry, and six compounds (styrene, 1-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl) benzene, eucalyptol, undecane, 5-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-2-cyclohexen-1-one, and thujopsene) were identified as contributing most in distinguishing infected fruit. In a similar work ( Li, Schmidt & Gitaitis, 2011), a conducting polymer e-nose was applied to onions inoculated with Botrytis allii and Burkholderia cepacia pathogens for botrytis neck rot and sour skin, respectively. CA dendrogram illustrated that the e-nose profiles of the two pathogen inoculated bulbs were much closer to each other and separated from the healthy onion bulbs. In the GC-MS experiments, 24 major volatiles were identified in pathogen inoculated bulbs, and the majority of them were sulfur and aliphatic compounds; moreover, in the pathogen inoculated bulbs the volatiles were one or two orders of magnitude higher than in the control healthy bulbs.
Soft root is a widespread potato tuber disease that causes substantial losses each year to the potato industry. In the work of Rutolo et al. (2016); the possibility to early detect and monitor this disease was explored using a commercial e-nose. Potato tubers were inoculated with Pectobacterium carotovorum, which causes soft root. The results obtained by the application of various classification models (linear and non-linear methods) showed that selected MOS sensors were suitable for early disease evaluation and for the detection of disease progression to a symptomatic stage.
Process monitoring
In the last decade, consumer’s demand for processed products that keep their original characteristics is increased. Today every type of treatment should have as its goal the preservation of the sensorial and nutritional characteristics that are an important aspect of the processed food. Among processes that minimize the changes of the original characteristics, osmotic dehydration has gained an increased interest mainly as a pre-treatment in combined techniques ( Torreggiani & Bertolo, 2004). In two works, a commercial e-nose was applied to evaluate changes of volatile profile during osmotic dehydration of strawberry slices ( Buratti et al., 2006) and tomato slices ( Pani et al., 2008).
Strawberry is one of the most used fruits for osmodehydration processing ( Torreggiani & Bertolo, 2004) especially for its characteristic flavor, which is a very complex mixture of esters, aldehydes, alcohols, furans, and sulfur compounds ( Azodanlau et al., 2004; Douillard & Guichard, 1989; Forney et al., 1996). In the work of Buratti et al. (2006) strawberry slices were subjected to osmotic dehydration at 30°C for 1, 2, 4, and 6 h using either 60% sucrose or 60% sorbitol solutions, and the e-nose was applied to evaluate the strawberry aroma changes. Nine major volatile compounds of fresh and processed strawberry slices were identified by GC. The results demonstrated that the e-nose was able to reveal changes in the strawberry aroma profile during processing and permitted the differentiation between dehydrated strawberry samples obtained with different osmotic treatments.
Pani et al. (2008) studied the influence of the osmotic pre-treatment on chemico-physical properties, drying kinetics, structure collapse, and color changes of air-dried tomato slices. In this work the e-nose was able to follow the aromatic profile evolution during air dehydration process, useful to understand and parameterize the degradative events caused by dehydration.
Post-harvest dehydration by solar irradiation and tunnel drying are two of the most widely used techniques to obtain dried grapes for consumption as raisins or for production of dessert wines. The parameters that winemakers use to control the drying time are the sugar concentration and the water loss. Anyway, the volatile compounds formed during drying are of great importance since excessive drying could compromise the aromatic quality of grapes. In this contest, the electronic nose is a rapid tool that can help the winemaker to decide the optimum drying time by assessing the aromatic evolution of grapes during dehydration. Lopez de Lerma et al. (2012) and Lopez de Lerma, Moreno, and Peinado (2014) employed the e-nose to establish the optimum sun drying time for Vitis vinifera L. cv Tempranillo grapes and Pedro Ximenez grapes; in the paper of Santonico et al. (2010) the e-nose was applied to study the post-harvest air dehydration of Montepulciano grapes.
Vis/NIR and NIR spectroscopy applications
An overview of spectroscopy applications on fruits and vegetables is shown in Table 3. Works were grouped based on instrumental characteristics of the NIRs devices employed for the studies.
Selection of applications of vis/NIR and NIR spectroscopy on fruit and vegetables.
Instrument type | Common Name | Species | Spectral range (nm) | Response variable | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed system | Apple | M. domestica Borkh. | 380–2000 | SSC, Streif index, acidity, and firmness | Peirs et al. (2001) |
Apple | M. domestica “Idared” and “Golden delicious” | 400–1100 | SSC and firmness | Zude et al. (2006) | |
Apple | M. domestica | 300–1100 | Chlorophyll | Zude-Sasse, Truppel, and Herold (2002) | |
Apple | M. domestica | 400–800 | Chlorophyll, carotenoid, and anthocyanin content | Merzlyak, Solovchenko, and Gitelson (2003) | |
Apple | M. domestica | 400–2100 | Texture and flavor | Mehinagic et al. (2003) | |
Apricot and cherry | P. armeniaca L. and Prunus serotina L. | 400–2500 | SSC | Carlini, Massantini, and Mencarelli (2000) | |
Banana | Musa cavendishii L. | 220–2700 | Glucose, fructose, sucrose, and chlorophyll a | Zude (2003) | |
Carrot | D. carota L. | 800–1700 | Sugar content, αβ carotenes, chlorophyll a, vitamin C | Zude et al. (2007) | |
Chicory | C. intybus L. | 350–2500 | Sensory parameters: (sweetness, bitterness, and crunchiness) crunchiness, sugar content, and bitter compounds | François et al. (2008) | |
Kiwifruit | Actinidia deliciosa | 300–1140 | Dry matter and SSC | McGlone et al. (2002) | |
Lamb’s lettuce | V. locusta L. | 400–1000 | Glucose, fructose, sucrose, ascorbic acid, and chlorophyll content | Jacobs et al. (2014) | |
Mango | M. indica L. | 1200–2400 | Firmness, SSC, and acidity | Schmilovitch et al. (2000) | |
Pear | P. communis L. | 350–2500 | SSC and firmness | Paz et al. (2009) | |
Pineapple | comosus L. | 800–2560 | SSC, TA, and pH | Di Egidio et al. (2009) | |
Table grape | V. vinifera L. | 833–2500 | SSC | Parpinello et al. (2013) | |
Tomato | L. esculentum L. | 400–1500 | Color, firmness, lycopene, SSC, TA, pH, and electrical conductivity | Clément, Dorais, and Vernon (2008) | |
Portable/handheld | Apple | M. domestica | 400–1000 | SSC, chlorophyll, TA, flesh firmness, total phenols, carotenoids, and ascorbic acid | Beghi et al. (2013a) |
Apple | M. domestica | 400–1000; 1000–2000 | Quality decay during shelf life | Beghi et al. (2016) | |
Apricot | P. armeniaca L. | 650–1200 | SSC, total acidity and firmness | Camps and Christen (2009) | |
Blueberry | Vaccinium corymbosum | 400–1000 | SSC and firmness, total anthocyanins, total flavonoids, total polyphenols, and ascorbic acid | Guidetti et al. (2009) | |
Grape for wine | V. vinifera | 400–1000 | SSC, TA, and pH, and anthocyanins and polyphenols content | Guidetti, Beghi, and Bodria (2010) | |
Lamb’s lettuce | V. locusta L. | 400–1000 | pH, water content, total phenols, and chlorophyll a fluorescence | Giovenzana et al. (2014a) | |
Lamb’s lettuce | V. locusta L. | 400–1000; 1000–2000 | Quality decay during shelf life | Beghi et al. (2016) | |
Mandarin | C. reticulata L. | 310–1100 | SSC, TA | Antonucci et al. (2011) | |
Mango | M. indica L. | 1000–2200 | SSC | Saranwong, Sornsrivichai, and Kawano (2003) | |
Simplified system | Apple | M. domestica | Different sets of few individual wavelengths | SSC, water content, and firmness | Qing, Ji, and Zude (2007) |
Blueberry | V. corymbosum | 680, 740, 850 | Ripeness index | Beghi et al. (2013b) | |
Dye solutions (preliminary lab-scale tests) | / | 630, 690, 750, 850 | Different foreseeable applications | Civelli et al. (2015) | |
Grape for wine | V. vinifera | 670, 730, 780 | SSC and polyphenols | Giovenzana et al. (2014b) | |
Grape for wine | V. vinifera | 375, 470, 516, 635 | Anthocyanin content | Ghozlen et al. (2010) | |
Kiwifruit | A. deliciosa | 670, 720 | Fruit maturity stage index | Costa et al. (2011) | |
Apple | M. domestica | 670, 720 | Fruit maturity stage index in pre-harvest and during the storage life | Nyasordzi et al. (2013) | |
Apricot, | Orange red, Bergarouge | 670, 720 | Fruit maturity stage index | Costa et al. (2009) | |
Peach | P. persica (L.) Batsch | 670, 720 | Fruit maturity stage index | Bonora et al. (2013) | |
Lamb’s lettuce | V. locusta L. | 520, 680, 710, 720 | pH, moisture, and total phenols content | Beghi et al. (2014) | |
Mango | M. indica L. | 826, 882, 906, 954 | Starch and dry matter | Saranwong, Sornsrivichai, and Kawano (2004) | |
Orange juices | Eight commercial brands | 410, 520, 640, 930, 990 | SSC and pH | Cen, He, and Huang (2006) | |
Pear | P. communis L. | 18 selected wavelengths in the range 200–1100 | SSC | Xu et al. (2012) | |
Wine grape | V. vinifera L. | 630, 690, 750, 850 | SSC and TA | Giovenzana et al. (2015) |
Bench top full spectra devices
Many applications of NIRs spectroscopy as rapid tools for the prediction of the concentration of specific chemical constituents in agro-food products can be found in literature using bench top laboratory systems and sorting instruments for applications in research centers or in industry laboratories and warehouses. For example, NIRs have been successfully used to measure a wide range of apple fruit quality attributes, such as SSC ( Zude et al., 2006), TA ( Peirs et al., 2001), chlorophyll content ( Zude-Sasse, Truppel & Herold, 2002), phytonutrients ( Merzlyak, Solovchenko & Gitelson, 2003), and firmness ( Mehinagic et al., 2003). The SSC is the most studied index using NIRs spectroscopy, since calibration of sugar and moisture contents, as indices of fruit maturity stage or quality in post-harvest, particularly show high potential for these products. For example, SSC was measured in apple ( Peirs et al., 2001), table grape ( Parpinello et al., 2013), pear ( Paz et al., 2009), mango ( Schmilovitch et al., 2000), apricot and cherry ( Carlini, Massantini & Mencarelli, 2000), kiwifruit ( McGlone et al., 2002), orange juice ( Cen, He & Huang, 2006), banana ( Zude, 2003), and carrot ( Zude et al., 2007). An experiment was conducted to simultaneously measure various quality parameters of tomato (lycopene content, firmness, internal quality such as pH, soluble solids, TA, and electrical conductivity) in a non-destructive way by using vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy and chemometrics ( Clément, Dorais & Vernon, 2008). Results indicated that lycopene content and firmness were accurately predicted (R2 = 0.98 and 0.75, respectively), while the prediction of internal quality was less accurate, partly due to a low variability of these parameters among samples. Several applications of NIRs spectroscopy are noticeable specifically for monitoring the evolution of physical, chemical, and sensorial characteristics of packaged minimally processed fruits and vegetables, thus ensuring the eating quality during the entire production chain. NIR spectroscopy was used by Di Egidio et al. (2009) to investigate the loss of freshness of fresh-cut pineapple samples, stored at different temperatures. The FT-NIR spectra were acquired in reflectance mode directly on the fresh-cut pineapple slice. PCA was applied to the second derivative of the spectra to uncover molecular modifications occurring over the storage time. Good results with a clear discrimination between samples classified as “fresh” (pineapple stored up to 5 days, 4 days, and less than 1 day at 5.3°C, 8.6°C, and 15.8°C, respectively) and “old” (samples stored for longer than 6 days, 5 days, and 2 days at 5.3°C, 8.6°C, and 15.8°C, respectively) were obtained for the studied storage temperatures (5.3, 8.6, and 15.8°C). The applicability of vis/NIR spectroscopy was recently tested on lamb’s lettuce (V. locusta L.). Jacobs et al. (2014) developed a fast non-destructive methodology that used vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy to give an estimation of the remaining potential shelf life of lamb’s lettuce during storage. The vis/NIR spectra were correlated to the storage time and to the quality of the samples evaluated by colorimetric measurements and a panel of experts at the end of shelf life, by using PLS regression algorithm. Authors demonstrated that vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy was a valid, fast, and non-destructive method for determining and quantifying the storage period of lamb’s lettuce. François et al. (2008) tested a bench top NIR system for rapid prediction of sensory parameters in chicory like crunchiness, sugar content, and bitter compounds, obtaining good results.
Portable full spectra devices
The requirement to investigate fruit and vegetable quality and monitoring ripeness directly in the field resulted in the development of NIRs portable devices.
Research and innovations enabled NIRs devices to further decrease their physical size while increasing complexity and amount/size of collected data. Therefore, the availability of low-cost miniaturized spectrophotometers allows new NIRs instrumentation to be more compact and portable ( McClure & Tsuchikawa, 2007; Wang & Paliwal, 2007) opening new possibilities for field use. A few portable spectrophotometers, for example, the Fruit Tester 20 (FANTEC, Germany) tested by Saranwong, Sornsrivichai, and Kawano (2003) on intact mango fruit for the SSC determination, or the Jaz Modular Optical Sensing Suite (Ocean Optics, the Netherlands), and the QS_300 (Unitec SpA, Italy) were proposed for different agro-food applications.
The employment of portable devices suitable for field use is more complex than laboratory applications, due to the uncontrolled environmental conditions such as temperature fluctuations, uncontrolled lighting conditions, and power source. These phenomena should be minimized by appropriate data processing ( Nicolaï et al., 2007).
On fruits, a portable vis/NIR instrumentation, in controlled laboratory conditions, was applied by Antonucci et al. (2011) for prediction of TA on two cultivars of mandarin getting R2 that ranged 0.66–0.77, while for the SSC R2 ranged 0.71–0.72; on apricot, Camps and Christen (2009) estimated the SSC, the total acidity, and the firmness achieving R2 in cross-validation that ranged 0.77–0.92, 0.53–0.94, and 0.72–0.85, respectively. Beghi et al. (2013a) tested a portable vis/NIR device on “Golden Delicious” apples for the prediction of SSC, chlorophyll, TA, flesh firmness, and apples nutraceutic properties as total phenols, carotenoids, and ascorbic acid, obtaining R2 equal to 0.72, 0.86, 0.52, 0.44, 0.09, 0.77, and 0.50, respectively. Other studies were performed in field conditions to evaluate grape quality parameters ( Guidetti, Beghi & Bodria, 2010) and by the same authors to predict ripening indices of blueberry ( Guidetti et al., 2009). Regarding vegetables, Giovenzana et al. (2014a) investigated the applicability of portable vis/NIR spectroscopy in monitoring the freshness decay of fresh-cut V. locusta L. during storage at 4, 10, and 20°C. The shelf life of samples was evaluated by quality parameters (pH, water content, total phenols, and chlorophyll a fluorescence). PLS-DA models were developed to classify samples in four classes, based on the above mentioned parameters. The results obtained from PLS-DA models, in validation, gave a positive predictive value (PPV) of classification between 74% and 96%. Moreover, predictive models were performed applying PLS regression algorithm to study the correlation between quality indices and vis/NIR spectra. Very good results were obtained for total phenols with R2 and RPD equal to 0.89 and 3.19 and for chlorophyll a fluorescence with R2 and RPD equal to 0.92 and 3.22, respectively.
Finally, NIRs were applied through the packaging film by Beghi et al. (2016). The authors investigated the capability of NIRs spectroscopy to perform useful optical measurements not only directly in contact with the samples but even from the outside of the pack through the packaging film on fresh-cut Valerianella leaves and fresh-cut Golden Delicious apple slices. PCA and PLS-DA were applied on spectral data, and the expiration date was chosen as the freshness threshold to reach the objective. Results showed that the packaging presence had only a slight effect on the classification capability. Moreover, the results on Golden Delicious were also satisfactory even if the classification performances were lower than those obtained for Valerianella; however, overall collected PPVs ranged from 86.7% to 100.0%. These findings would be useful in the development of freshness decay assessment tools using these optical techniques along products’ post-packaging chain.
Simplified devices
The above mentioned applications rely on wide spectral ranges (thousands of wavelengths) and thus require multivariate techniques for data processing to build calibration and prediction models ( Cen & He, 2007; Williams & Norris, 2001). Complex chemometric techniques have to be applied to explain chemical information encoded in spectral data ( Cogdill & Anderson, 2005). Recently, a general challenge of the research in the field of NIRs instruments is the setting up, design, and testing of innovative simplified optical devices dedicated to a specific chain of the fresh and fresh-cut product sector. In this case chemometrics is used for the selection of a small number of relevant wavelengths, highly representative of the useful information contained in the full spectra ( Sun, 2010; Xiaobo et al., 2010). This approach allows to reduce to negligible values the spectral noise and to eliminate the variables containing redundant information. Moreover, a reduced cost for potential miniaturized devices, built to work at only these selected wavelengths, can be foreseen.
The development of simplified optical system for the rapid monitoring of fruit and vegetable parameters directly in field (e.g. ripeness evaluation, diseases and disorders detection, chemicals and physical properties prediction, freshness level or shelf life analysis) could be based on light-emitting diode (LED) technology. In particular, the evaluation of the ripening level of fruits showed several application cases ( Beghi et al., 2013b; Civelli et al., 2015Costa et al., 2011; Giovenzana et al., 2014b).
The identification of the most significant bands can be used as starting points for the selection of a few highly informative wavelengths. The selection can maintain the predictive ability of the models by reducing the bias introduced by the uninformative wavelengths ( Xu et al., 2009). To reach this goal, considerable efforts have been recently directed towards developing and evaluating different procedures for an objective identification of a few spectral variables containing most of the useful information and to reject redundant or useless variables ( Zou et al., 2010). In order to assess the performance of the envisaged simplified prototypes, comparative tests were performed using commercial devices using the full spectral range ( Beghi et al., 2014; Giovenzana et al. 2014b; 2015).
In a view of simplified optical systems, different approaches for variables selection were applied on wine grapes ( Giovenzana et al., 2014b) and on blueberries ( Beghi et al., 2013b), resulting in a selection of a very limited number of highly informative variables. The same authors identified and analyzed freshness parameters (pH, polyphenols, water content, and chlorophyll a fluorescence) of fresh-cut Valerianella leaf for the setting up of a simplified device ( Beghi et al., 2014). Through partial least squares regression analysis (PLS-RCA), standardized regression coefficients from PLS models were used to select the relevant variables, representing the most useful information into the full spectral region, and the four selected wavelengths were 520 nm, 680 nm, 710 nm, and 720 nm. In order to highlight the innovative features, a scheme of a future device was proposed adopting four LEDs as illumination sources at the specific wavelengths, with filtered photodiodes for the readout signal. In order to study the efficiency of the wavelengths selection, the MLR technique was applied. The overall calibration and prediction results of the MLR models were satisfactory, although the performance of the MLR models was slightly worse than the good PLS models. RPD value for pH decreased from 2.54 for PLS to 1.83 for MLR; regarding the moisture content, RPD showed a slight decrement from 2.25 to 2.08, and for total phenols from 3.19 to 2.48 for PLS and MLR, respectively.
Xu et al. (2012) studied four different variable selection methods, namely, stepwise MLR, genetic algorithm (GA)-PLS, interval PLS, and successive projection algorithm (SPA)-MLR combined with GA (GA-SPA-MLR) to on-line determination of sugar content in pears. The results derived by these techniques were then compared. The calibration model built using GA-SPA-MLR on 18 selected wavelengths (2% of the total number of variables) exhibited higher R2 = 0.880 and RMSEP = 0.459° Brix for the validation set.
Qing, Ji, and Zude (2007) tested GAs for the wavelength selection for predicting SSC, firmness, and water content in apple fruit; different sets of individual wavelengths were tested for the identification of the most informative for each studied parameter. Saranwong, Sornsrivichai, and Kawano (2004) selected four effective wavelengths (826, 882, 914, and 954 nm) usable for the prediction of the ripe-stage eating quality (starch content and dry matter) of mango fruit starting from NIR spectra, achieving correlation coefficients of r = 0.93 and r = 0.96 for starch and dry matter, respectively.
A limited number of already built prototypes of simplified systems based on the analysis of a few variables can be found in literature. Civelli et al. (2015) designed and tested a simplified, LED-based, modular system to be used for the rapid evaluation of fruit and vegetable quality, and preliminary tests performed on lab scale using dye solutions gave encouraging results. The designed LED-based vis/NIR system was tested by the same authors ( Giovenzana et al., 2015) for rapid ripeness evaluation of white grape (V. vinifera L.). In order to prove the effectiveness of the simplified system, a portable commercial vis/NIR spectrophotometer was used as reference instrument for performance comparison (Figure 2). Correlations between the optical data matrix and ripening parameters (total SSC and TA) were carried out using PLS regression for spectra and using MLR for data from the simplified device (Table 4). Moreover, classification analysis was also performed with the aim of discriminate ripe and unripe samples. Finally, simple equations for SSC and TA prediction were calculated.

Functional scheme of (A) a portable full range vis/NIR device and (B) a simplified optical device working at four selected wavebands for supporting decisions on optimal harvest date ( Giovenzana et al., 2015).
Descriptive statistics and statistics of the PLS models elaborated on VIS-NIR spectra and of the MLR models, based on data of the simplified device (four wavelengths 630, 690, 750, and 850 nm) to predict the ripeness parameters of white grapes ( Giovenzana et al., 2015).
Ripeness parameters | Cross-validation PLS | Cross-validation MLR | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | R2cv | RMSEC | RPD | RER | N | R2cv | RMSECV | RPD | RER | |
SSC (°Brix) on berries | 475 | 0.71 | 1.8 | 1.94 | 8.72 | 433 | 0.66 | 1.9 | 1.74 | 8.26 |
SSC (°Brix) on bunches | 95 | 0.80 | 1.3 | 2.13 | 8.77 | 89 | 0.65 | 1.8 | 1.67 | 7.31 |
TA (g/dm3) | 95 | 0.81 | 1.9 | 2.32 | 10.14 | 89 | 0.85 | 1.8 | 2.50 | 12.40 |
Umidity |
A few examples of commercial non-destructive devices based on a small number of wavelengths are already available on the market. These applications are mainly dedicated to fruits. For example, the University of Bologna patented innovative and simplified NIRs equipments, namely, DA-Meter for peaches ( Bonora et al., 2013) and Kiwi-Meter for kiwi ( Costa et al., 2011). These systems are used for the analysis of the ripeness level of the fruit through indices based on differences in absorbance between specific wavelengths. This type of instrument, simple and portable, can be used directly on the fruit on the trees and can help growers in making decisions regarding the best cultural management practices (such as pruning, thinning, and nutrition). In this way, the heterogeneity of the product can be reduced and, therefore, the management of product lots can be simplified during pre- and post-harvest. Moreover, the DA-Meter was used also on apricot to verify the applicability of the device in monitoring ripening-related changes ( Costa et al., 2009) and to sort apples both at harvest for different quality classes and after storage at removal from storage rooms for different marketing classes ( Nyasordzi et al., 2013).
Another commercial hand-held fluorescence sensor equipped with nine LEDs (six UV and three RGB) and filtered-photodiode detection (Multiplex®, FORCE-A, Orsay, France) was tested for the analysis on anthocyanin content in grape samples ( Ghozlen et al., 2010). Simplified devices based on the measurement of the normalized difference vegetation index are also available ( Garrity, Vierling & Bickford, 2010; Sankaran et al., 2010); these instruments are used for remote sensing application for the study of the relationships between spectral reflectance at specific wavelengths and the characteristics of the vegetation canopies.
Future perspectives
As summarized in this review, e-nose and NIRs devices have been used for many applications to analyze and evaluate the quality of fruits and vegetables. The availability of non-destructive instruments that allow to evaluate changes during shelf life or to estimate quality parameters may have a wide number of practical applications in the product chain: during ripening, in the production process, in the storage period, and during the distribution. Furthermore, a future perspective could be the implementation of these devices, both e-nose and NIRs systems equipped with more robust predictive models, directly at the point of sale as a guarantee, for the consumers, of fresh and minimal processed product quality. New researches should be performed in view of a general simplification of the devices and higher user-friendly utilization.
E-nose and NIRs can be mutually complementary, and their combined application could be assumed; sensors-fusion approach could allow a comprehensive analyses of physico/chemical and sensorial features through the simultaneous use of both these technologies in simplified systems based on a few e-nose sensors and NIRs variables, thus providing rapid information about the appearance, the chemical composition, and the aromatic profile of fruits and vegetables.
These two techniques could be applied as non-destructive tools to classify fruits and vegetables in homogeneous lots with the purpose of a better management of their destination during postharvest life in order to avoid fruit and vegetable wastage.
Regarding NIRs, important drivers for a further success of these optical systems for evaluating fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables will be (i) the spectral analysis through the packaging and (ii) the design of compact-sized LED technology-based devices and of customized optical hardware to be coupled with smart phones and related applications, making mobile devices able to classify products on the bases of their quality. These devices are in fact increasingly complex, computationally powerful, sensor-rich, and integrated with social networking. The development of smart phones has led to a proliferation of software applications (apps) which are able to run the execution of the optical measurements, using also the embedded camera of the device. Of course, further studies are needed to determine the best operating conditions and the engineering phases to perform the measurement directly at the retail site. Researchers need to better investigate the measurement through the packaging considering the potential influence of the headspace between the film and product surface, which can affect the spectroscopic signal sensitivity.
Considering the e-nose, the challenges for the future are a further development of e-nose technologies for smaller, simplified, portable, and low-cost devices to be used from field to retail site. The development of new sensor types more effective for gas detection and discrimination and the execution of new algorithms for data elaboration are required to improve the applicability of this device.
In future, the availability of simpler and low-cost compact tools, also combining different technologies, will allow a big impact at different levels of the supply chain, with a real possibility of wide diffusion of these devices up to the consumers. Producers and retailers could take advantage of the application of these non-destructive devices for better management of the products in order to share with customer quality information about fruits and vegetables on sale, maximizing transparency and ensuring consumer loyalty.
References
Abbey, L., Joyce, D. C., Aked, J. & Smith, B. (2005). Evaluation of eight spring onion genotypes, sulphur nutrition and soil-type effects with an electronic nose. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech., 80, 375–381.10.1080/14620316.2005.11511947Search in Google Scholar
Aguayo, E. & Silveira, A. C. (2008). Influence of treatments on retaining nutritional compounds in fresh-cut fruit. Proceedings of the Tropical Fruits in Human Nutrition and Health Conference 2008, Brisbane, Australia, 8–11 November, (pp. 134–145).Search in Google Scholar
Amrani, M. E. H., Persaud, K. C. & Payne, P. A. (1995). High-frequency measurements of conducting polymers: Development of a new technique for sensing volatile chemicals. Meas. Sci. Technol., 6, 1500–1507.10.1088/0957-0233/6/10/010Search in Google Scholar
Antonucci, F., Pallottino, F., Paglia, G., Palma, A., D’Aquino, S. & Menesatti, P. (2011). Non-destructive estimation of mandarin maturity status through portable VIS-NIR spectrophotometer. Food Bioprocess Tech., 4, 809–813.10.1007/s11947-010-0414-5Search in Google Scholar
Azodanlau, R., Darbellay, C., Luisier, J. L., Villettaz, J. C. & Amadò, R. (2004). Changes in flavour and texture during ripening of strawberries. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 218, 167–172.10.1007/s00217-003-0822-0Search in Google Scholar
Bai, J., Baldwin, E. A., Soliva Fortuny, R. C., Mattheis, J. P., Stanley, R., Perera, C. & Brechet, J. K. (2004). Effect of pretreatment of intact ‘Gala’ apple with ethanol vapor, heat, or 1-methylcyclopropene on quality and shelf life of fresh-cut slices. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 129, 583–593.10.21273/JASHS.129.4.0583Search in Google Scholar
Bartz, J. A. & Brecht, J. K. (2002). In Postharvest physiology and pathology of vegetables (2nd ed.). New York: Marcel Dekker.10.1201/9780203910092Search in Google Scholar
Beebe, K. R., Pell, R. J. & Seasholtz, M. B. (1998). In Chemometrics, a practical guide. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Beghi, R., Spinardi, A., Bodria, L., Mignani, I. & Guidetti, R. (2013a). Apples nutraceutic properties evaluation through a visible and near-infrared portable system. Food Bioprocess Tech., 6, 2547–2554.10.1007/s11947-012-0824-7Search in Google Scholar
Beghi, R., Giovenzana, V., Spinardi, A., Guidetti, R., Bodria, L. & Oberti, R. (2013b). Derivation of a blueberry ripeness index with a view to a low-cost, handheld optical sensing device for supporting harvest decisions. Trans. ASABE, 56, 1551–1559.10.13031/trans.56.10169Search in Google Scholar
Beghi, R., Giovenzana, V., Civelli, R., Malegori, C., Buratti, S. & Guidetti, R. (2014). Setting-up of a simplified handheld optical device for decay detection in fresh-cut Valerianella locusta L. J. Food Eng., 127, 10–15.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.11.019Search in Google Scholar
Beghi, R., Giovenzana, V., Civelli, R. & Guidetti, R. (2016). Influence of packaging in the analysis of fresh-cut Valerianella locusta L. and Golden Delicious apple slices by visible-near infrared and near infrared spectroscopy. J. Food Eng., 171, 145–152.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.10.021Search in Google Scholar
Benedetti, S., Mannino, S., Sabatini, A. G. & Marcazzan, G. L. (2004). Electronic nose and neural network use for the classification of honey. Apidologie, 35, 397–402.10.1051/apido:2004025Search in Google Scholar
Benedetti, S., Buratti, S., Spinardi, A., Mannino, S. & Mignani, I. (2008). Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to characterise peach cultivars and to monitor their ripening stage during shelf-life. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 47, 181–188.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.06.012Search in Google Scholar
Benedetti, S., Spinardi, A., Mignani, I. & Buratti, S. (2010). Non-destructive evaluation of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) ripeness using an electronic nose. Ital. J. Food Sci., 22, 298–304.Search in Google Scholar
Berna, A. Z., Lammertyn, J., Saevels, S., Di Natale, C. & Nicolaï, B. M. (2004). Electronic nose systems to study shelf life and cultivar effect on tomato aroma profile. Sens. Actuators B, 97, 324–333.10.1016/j.snb.2003.09.020Search in Google Scholar
Berna, A. Z., Buysens, S., Di Natale, C., Grün, I. U., Lammertyn, J. & Nicolai, B. M. (2005). Relating sensory analysis with electronic nose and headspace fingerprint MS for tomato aroma profiling. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 36, 143–155.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.12.006Search in Google Scholar
Biondi, E., Blasioli, S., Galeone, A., Spinelli, F., Cellini, A., Lucchese, C. & Braschi, I. (2014). Detection of potato brown rot and ring rot by electronic nose: From laboratory to real scale. Talanta, 129, 422–430.10.1016/j.talanta.2014.04.057Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Bonora, E., Noferini, M., Vidoni, S. & Costa, G. (2013). Modeling fruit ripening for improving peach homogeneity in planta. Sci. Hort., 159, 166–171.10.1016/j.scienta.2013.05.011Search in Google Scholar
Boudhrioua, N., Giampaoli, P. & Bonazzi, C. (2003). Changes in aromatic components of banana during ripening and air-drying. Lebensm. Wiss. U. Technol., 36, 633–642.10.1016/S0023-6438(03)00083-5Search in Google Scholar
Brezmes, J., Llobet, E., Vilanova, X., Saiz, G. & Correig, X. (2000). Fruit ripeness monitoring using an electronic nose. Sens. Actuator B., 69, 223–229.10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00494-9Search in Google Scholar
Brezmes, J., Llobet, E., Vilanova, X., Orts, J., Saiz, G. & Correig, X. (2001). Correlation between electronic nose signals and fruit quality indicators on shelf-life measurements with Pinklady apples. Sens. Actuator B, 80, 41–50.10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00867-XSearch in Google Scholar
Buratti, S., Rizzolo, A., Benedetti, S. & Torreggiani, D. (2006). Electronic nose to detect strawberry aroma changes during osmotic dehydration. J. Food Sci., 71, E184–E189.10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00007.xSearch in Google Scholar
Camps, C. & Christen, D. (2009). Non-destructive assessment of apricot fruit quality by portable visible-near infrared spectroscopy. LWT – Food Sci. Technol., 42, 1125–1131.10.1016/j.lwt.2009.01.015Search in Google Scholar
Carlini, P., Massantini, R. & Mencarelli, F. (2000). Vis-NIR measurement of soluble solids in cherry and apricot by PLS regression and wavelength selection. J. Agric. Food Chem., 48, 5236–5242.10.1021/jf000408fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Cen, H., He, Y. & Huang, M. (2006). Measurement of soluble solids contents and pH in orange juice using chemometrics and vis-NIRS. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54, 7437–7443.10.1021/jf061689fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Cen, H. & He, Y. (2007). Theory and application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy in determination of food quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 18, 72–83.10.1016/j.tifs.2006.09.003Search in Google Scholar
Chong, I. G. & Jun, C. H. (2005). Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 78, 103–112.10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.12.011Search in Google Scholar
Christensen, C. M. (1983). Effect of color on aroma, flavor and texture judgments of food. J. Food Sci., 48, 787–790.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb14899.xSearch in Google Scholar
Civelli, R., Giovenzana, V., Beghi, R., Naldi, E., Guidetti, R. & Oberti, R. (2015). A simplified, light emitting diode (LED) based, modular system to be used for the rapid evaluation of fruit and vegetable quality: Development and validation on dye solutions. Sensors, 15, 22705–22723.10.3390/s150922705Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Clément, A., Dorais, M. & Vernon, M. (2008). Nondestructive measurement of fresh tomato lycopene content and other physicochemical characteristics using visible−NIR spectroscopy. J. Agr. Food Chem., 56, 9813–9818.10.1021/jf801299rSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Cogdill, R. P. & Anderson, C. A. (2005). Efficient spectroscopic calibration using net analyte signal and pure component projection methods. J. Near Infrared Spec., 13, 119–132.10.1255/jnirs.464Search in Google Scholar
Concina, I., Falasconi, M., Gobbi, E., Bianchi, F., Musci, M., Mattarozzi, M., Pardo, M., Mangia, A., Careri, M. & Sberveglieri, G. (2009). Early detection of microbial contamination in processed tomatoes by electronic nose. Food Control, 20, 873–880.10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.11.006Search in Google Scholar
Corbo, M. R., Speranza, B., Campaniello, D., D’Amato, D. & Sinigaglia, M. (2010). Fresh-cut fruits preservation: current status and emerging technologies. In A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.), Current research, technology and education topics in applied microbiology and microbial biotechnology (pp. 1143–1154). Badajoz: Formatex Research Center.Search in Google Scholar
Correa, A. R., Quicazan, M. C. & Hernandez, C. E. (2015). Modelling the shelf-life of apple products according to their water activity. Chem. Eng. Trans., 43, 199–204.Search in Google Scholar
Costa, G., Noferini, M., Fiori, G. & Torrigiani, P. (2009). Use of Vis/NIR spectroscopy to assess fruit ripening stage and improve management in post-harvest chain. GBS J. Fresh Produce, 3, 35–41.Search in Google Scholar
Costa, G., Bonora, E., Fiori, G. & Noferini, M. (2011). Innovative non-destructive device for fruit quality assessment. Acta Horticult., 913, 575–581.10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.913.78Search in Google Scholar
Defilippi, B. G., San Juan, W., Valdes, H., Moya-León, M. A., Infante, R. & Campos-Vargas, R. (2009). The aroma development during storage of Castlebrite apricots as evaluated by gas chromatography, electronic nose, and sensory analysis. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 51, 212–219.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.08.008Search in Google Scholar
de Lacy Costello, B. P. J., Ewen, R. J., Gunson, H. E., Ratcliffe, N. M. & Spencer-Phillips, P. T. (2000). The development of a sensor system for the early detection of soft rot in stored potato tubers. Meas. Sci. Technol., 11, 1685–1691.10.1088/0957-0233/11/12/305Search in Google Scholar
Demir, N., Ferraz, A. C. O., Sargent, S. A. & Balaban, M. O. (2011). Classification of impacted blueberries during storage using an electronic nose. J. Sci. Food Agric., 91, 1722–1727.10.1002/jsfa.4378Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Di Egidio, V., Sinelli, N., Limbo, S., Torri, L., Franzetti, L. & Casiraghi, E. (2009). Evaluation of shelf-life of fresh-cut pineapple using FT-NIR and FT-IR spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 54, 87–92.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.06.006Search in Google Scholar
Di Natale, C., Macagnano, A., Martinelli, E., Proietti, E., Paolesse, R., Castellari, L., Campani, S. & D’Amico, A. (2001a). Electronic nose based investigation of the sensorial properties of peaches and nectarines. Sens. Actuators B, 77, 561–566.10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00705-5Search in Google Scholar
Di Natale, C., Macagnano, A., Martinelli, E., Paolesse, R., Proietti, E. & D’Amico, A. (2001b). The evaluation of quality of post-harvest oranges and apples by means of an electronic nose. Sens. Actuator B, 78, 26–31.10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00787-0Search in Google Scholar
Di Natale, C., Zude-Sasse, M., Macagnano, A., Paolesse, R., Herold, B. & D’Amico, A. (2002). Outer product analysis of electronic nose and visible spectra: application to the measurement of peach fruit characteristics. Anal. Chim. Acta, 459, 107–117.10.1016/S0003-2670(02)00107-1Search in Google Scholar
Douillard, C. & Guichard, E. (1989). Comparison by multidimensional analysis of concentrations of volatile compounds in fourteen frozen strawberries varieties. Sci Aliment., 9, 53–76.Search in Google Scholar
Esbensen, K. H. & Geladi, P. (2010). Principles of proper validation: Use and abuse of re-sampling for validation. J. Chemometrics, 24, 168–187.10.1002/cem.1310Search in Google Scholar
Fernández-Novales, J., López, M. I., Sánchez, M. T., Morales, J. & González-Caballero, V. (2009). Shortwave-near infrared spectroscopy for determination of reducing sugar content during grape ripening, winemaking, and aging of white and red wines. Food Res. Int., 42, 285–291.10.1016/j.foodres.2008.11.008Search in Google Scholar
Forney, C. F. (2001). Horticultural and other factors affecting aroma volatile composition of small fruit. HortTechnology, 11, 529–538.10.21273/HORTTECH.11.4.529Search in Google Scholar
Forney, C. F., Kalt, W., McDonald, J. E. & Jordan, M. A. (1996). Changes in strawberry fruit quality during ripening on and off the plant. Acta Hort., 464, 506.10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.464.98Search in Google Scholar
François, I. M., Wins, H., Buysens, S., Godts, C., Van Pee, E. & Nicolaï, B. (2008). Predicting sensory attributes of different chicory hybrids using physico-chemical measurements and visible/near infrared spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 49, 366–373.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.02.011Search in Google Scholar
Gardner, J. W. & Bartlett, P. N. Pattern recognition in odour sensing. (1992). In J. W. Gardner & P. N. Bartlett Sensors and sensory systems for an electronic nose (Vol. 212, pp. 161–179). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-015-7985-8_11Search in Google Scholar
Gardner, J. W. & Bartlett, P. N. (1993). Brief history of electronic nose. Sens. Actuators B, 18, 211–213.10.1016/0925-4005(94)87085-3Search in Google Scholar
Garrity, S. R., Vierling, L. A. & Bickford, K. (2010). A simple filtered photodiode instrument for continuous measurement of narrowband NDVI and PRI over vegetated canopies. Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 489–496.10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.01.004Search in Google Scholar
Ghozlen, N. B., Cerovic, Z. G., Germain, C., Toutain, S. & Latouche, G. (2010). Non-destructive optical monitoring of grape maturation by proximal sensing. Sensors, 10, 10040–10068.10.3390/s101110040Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Giovenzana, V., Beghi, R., Buratti, S., Civelli, R. & Guidetti, R. (2014a). Monitoring of fresh-cut Valerianella locusta Laterr. shelf life by electronic nose and VIS–NIR spectroscopy. Talanta, 120, 368–375.10.1016/j.talanta.2013.12.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Giovenzana, V., Beghi, R., Malegori, C., Civelli, R. & Guidetti, R. (2014b). Wavelength selection with a view to a simplified handheld optical system to estimate grape ripeness. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 65, 117–123.10.5344/ajev.2013.13024Search in Google Scholar
Giovenzana, V., Civelli, R., Beghi, R., Oberti, R. & Guidetti, R. (2015). Testing of a simplified LED based vis/NIR system for rapid ripeness evaluation of white grape (Vitis vinifera L.) for Franciacorta wine. Talanta, 144, 584–591.10.1016/j.talanta.2015.06.055Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Gómez, A. H., Hu, G., Wang, J. & Pereira, A. G. (2006a). Evaluation of tomato maturity by electronic nose. Comput. Electron. Agric., 54, 44–52.10.1016/j.compag.2006.07.002Search in Google Scholar
Gómez, A. H., Wang, J., Hu, G. & Pereira, A. G. (2006b). Electronic nose technique potential monitoring mandarin maturity. Sens. Actuators B., 113, 347–353.10.1016/j.snb.2005.03.090Search in Google Scholar
Gómez, A. H., Wang, J., Hu, G. & Pereira, A. G. (2007). Discrimination of storage shelf-life for mandarin by electronic nose technique. LWT Food Sci. Technol., 40, 681–689.10.1016/j.lwt.2006.03.010Search in Google Scholar
Gómez, A. H., Wang, J., Hu, G. & Pereira, A. G. (2008). Monitoring storage shelf life of tomato using electronic nose technique. J. Food Eng., 85, 625–631.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.06.039Search in Google Scholar
Gorny, J. R., Cifuentes, R. A., Hess-Pierce, B. & Kader, A. A. (2000). Quality changes in fresh-cut pear slices as affected by cultivar, ripeness stage, fruit size, and storage regime. J. Food Sci., 65, 541–544.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb16044.xSearch in Google Scholar
Guidetti, R., Beghi, R., Bodria, L., Spinardi, A., Mignani, I. & Folini, L. (2009). Prediction of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) ripeness by a portable Vis-NIR device. Acta Hortic., 810, 877–886.10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.810.117Search in Google Scholar
Guidetti, R., Beghi, R. & Bodria, L. (2010). Evaluation of Grape Quality Parameters by a Simple Vis/NIR System. Trans. Asabe, 53, 477–484.10.13031/2013.29556Search in Google Scholar
Guidetti, R., Beghi, R. & Giovenzana, V. Chemometrics in food technology. Varmuza, K. (Ed.), (2012). In Chemometrics in practical applications (pp. 217–252). Croatia: InTech.Search in Google Scholar
Guilbault, G. & Jordan, J. M. (1988). Analytical uses of piezoelectric crystal: A review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 19, 1–28.10.1080/10408348808085615Search in Google Scholar
Guohua, H., Yuling, W., Dandan, Y., Wenwen, D., Linshan, Z. & Lvye, W. (2012). Study of peach freshness predictive method based on electronic nose. Food Control, 28, 25–32.10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.025Search in Google Scholar
Guohua, H., Yuling, W., Dandan, Y. & Wenwen, D. (2013). Fuji apple storage time predictive method using electronic nose. Food Anal. Methods, 6, 82–88.10.1007/s12161-012-9414-6Search in Google Scholar
Infante, R., Farcuh, M. & Meneses, C. (2008). Monitoring the sensorial quality and aroma through an electronic nose in peaches during cold storage. J. Sci. Food Agric., 88, 2073–2078.10.1002/jsfa.3316Search in Google Scholar
Infante, R., Rubio, P., Meneses, C. & Contador, L. (2011). Ripe nectarines segregated through sensory quality evaluation and electronic nose assessment. Fruits, 66, 109–119.10.1051/fruits/2011020Search in Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. A. J. G., Verlinden, B. E., Bobelyn, E., Decombel, A., Bleyaert, P. & Van Lommel, J. (2014). Predicting stored period and shelf life potential of lamb’s lettuce using vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy. Acta Hortic., 1079, 207–213.10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1079.23Search in Google Scholar
Kader, A. A. (2002a). In Postharvest technology of horticultural crops (3rd ed.). USA: University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3311.Search in Google Scholar
Kader, A. A. (2002). Cap. 2, Quality parameters of fresh-cut fruit and vegetable products. In O. Lamikanra (Ed.), Fresh-cut fruits and vegetables (pp. 11–20) NY, USA: CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kader, A. A. (2008). Flavor quality of fruits and vegetables. J. Sci. Food Agric, 88, 1863–1868.10.1002/jsfa.3293Search in Google Scholar
Kays, S. J. & Paull, R. E. (2004). In Postharvest biology. Athens, GA: Exon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Knee, M. (2002). In Fruit quality and its biological basis. Sheffield, UK: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kohl, D. Oxidic semiconductor gas sensors. Sberveglieri, G. (Ed.), (1992). In Gas sensors (pp. 43–88). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-2737-0_2Search in Google Scholar
Konduru, T., Rains, G. C. & Li, C. (2015a). A customized metal oxide semiconductor-based gas sensor array for onion quality evaluation: System development and characterization. Sensors, 15, 1252–1273.10.3390/s150101252Search in Google Scholar
Konduru, T., Rains, G. C. & Li, C. (2015b). Detection sour skin infected onions using a customized gas sensor array. J. Food Eng., 160, 19–27.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.03.025Search in Google Scholar
Lamikanra, O. (Ed.), (2002). In Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables: Science, Technology, and Market. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.10.1201/9781420031874Search in Google Scholar
Lammertyn, J., Peirs, A., De Baerdemaeker, J. & Nicolaï, B. M. (2000). Light penetration properties of NIR radiation in fruit with respect to non-destructive quality assessment. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 18, 121–132.10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00071-XSearch in Google Scholar
Lavilla, T., Recasens, I., Lopez, M. L. & Puy, J. (2002). Multivariate analysis of maturity stages, including quality and aroma, in “Rojal Glory” peaches and “Big Top” nectarine. J. Sci. Food Agric., 82, 1842–1849.10.1002/jsfa.1268Search in Google Scholar
Lebrun, M., Plotto, A., Goodner, K., Ducamp, M. N. & Baldwin, E. (2008). Discrimination of mango fruit maturity by volatiles using the electronic nose and gas chromatography. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 48, 122–131.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.09.010Search in Google Scholar
Li, C., Heinemann, P. & Sherry, R. (2007). Neural network and Bayesian network fusion models to fuse electronic nose and surface acoustic wave sensor data for apple defect detection. Sens. Actuator B, 125, 301–310.10.1016/j.snb.2007.02.027Search in Google Scholar
Li, C., Krewer, G. W., Ji, P., Scherm, H. & Kays, S. J. (2010). Gas sensor array for blueberry fruit disease detection and classification. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 55, 144–149.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.11.004Search in Google Scholar
Li, C., Schmidt, N. E. & Gitaitis, R. (2011). Detection of onion postharvest diseases by analyses of headspace volatiles using a gas sensor array and GC-MS. LWT Food Sci. Technol., 44, 1019–1025.10.1016/j.lwt.2010.11.036Search in Google Scholar
Liu, F., Jiang, Y. & He, Y. (2009). Variable selection in visible/near infrared spectra for linear and nonlinear calibrations: a case study to determine soluble solids content of beer. Anal. Chim. Acta, 635, 45–52.10.1016/j.aca.2009.01.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Lopez de Lerma, N., Bellincontro, A., Mencarelli, F., Moreno, J. & Peinado, R. A. (2012). Use of electronic nose, validated by GC-MS, to establish the optimum off-vine dehydration time of wine grapes. Food Chem., 130, 447–452.10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.07.058Search in Google Scholar
Lopez de Lerma, N., Moreno, J. & Peinado, R. A. (2014). Determination of the optimum sun-drying time for Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo grapes by e-nose analysis and characterization of their volatile composition. Food Bioprocess Technol., 7, 732–740.10.1007/s11947-013-1086-8Search in Google Scholar
Lundstrom, I., Spetz, A., Winquist, F., Ackelid, U. & Sundgren, H. (1990). Catalytic metals and field-effect devices useful combination. Sens. Actuator B, 1, 15–20.10.1016/0925-4005(90)80164-USearch in Google Scholar
McClure, W. F. & Tsuchikawa, S. Instruments. Yukihiro Ozaki, W. & A. A. C. Fred McClure (Eds.), (2007). In Near-Infrared spectroscopy in food science and technology (pp. 75–107). Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Interscience.Search in Google Scholar
McGlone, V. A., Jordan, R. B., Seelye, R. & Martinsen, P. J. (2002). Comparing density and NIR methods for measurement of kiwifruit dry matter and soluble solids content. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 26, 191–198.10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00014-5Search in Google Scholar
Mehinagic, E., Royer, G., Bertrand, D., Symoneaux, R., Laurens, F. & Jourjon, F. (2003). Relationship between sensory analysis, penetrometry and visible-NIR spectroscopy of apples belonging to different cultivars. Food Qual. Pref., 14, 473–484.10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00012-0Search in Google Scholar
Mehmood, T., Liland, K. H., Snipen, L. & Sæbø, S. (2012). A review of variable selection methods in partial least squares regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 118, 62–69.10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.07.010Search in Google Scholar
Meloun, M., Militky, J. & Forina, M. (1992). In Chemometrics for analytical chemistry. New York, USA: Ellis Horwood.Search in Google Scholar
Merzlyak, M. N., Solovchenko, A. E. & Gitelson, A. A. (2003). Reflectance spectral features and non-destructive estimation of chlorophyll, carotenoid and anthocyanin content in apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 27, 197–211.10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00066-2Search in Google Scholar
Messina, V., Domínguez, P. G., Sancho, A. M., Walsöe de Reca, N., Carrari, F. & Grigioni, G. (2012). Tomato quality during short-term storage assessed by colour and electronic nose. Int. J. Electrochem., 1–7.10.1155/2012/687429Search in Google Scholar
Mielle, P. (1996). Electronic noses: towards the objective instrumental characterization of food aroma. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 7, 432–438.10.1016/S0924-2244(96)10045-5Search in Google Scholar
Musumarra, G., Condorelli, D. F. & Fortuna, C. G. (2011). OPLS-DA as a suitable method for selecting a set of gene transcripts discriminating RAS-and PTPN11-mutated cells in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Comb. Chem. High T. Scr., 14, 36–46.10.2174/1386207311107010036Search in Google Scholar
Naes, T., Isaksson, T., Fearn, T. & Davies, T. (2002). In A user-friendly guide to multivariate calibration and classification. Chichester, UK: NIR Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Nicolaï, B. M., Beullens, K., Bobelyn, E., Peirs, A., Saeys, W. & Theron, K. I. (2007). Nondestructive measurement of fruit and vegetable quality by means of NIR spectroscopy: a review. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 46, 99–118.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.06.024Search in Google Scholar
Nyasordzi, J., Friedman, H., Schmilovitch, Z., Ignat, T., Weksler, A., Rot, I. & Lurie, S. (2013). Utilizing the I AD index to determine internal quality attributes of apples at harvest and after storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 77, 80–86.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Odumeru, J. A., Boulter, J., Knight, K., Lu, X. & McKellar, R. (2003). Assessment of a wash treatment with warm chlorinated water to extend the shelf life of ready-to-use lettuce. J. Food Quality, 26, 197–209.10.1111/j.1745-4557.2003.tb00238.xSearch in Google Scholar
Oshita, S., Shima, K., Haruta, T., Seo, Y., Kawagoe, Y., Nakayama, S. & Takahara, H. (2000). Discrimination of odors emanating from ‘La France’ pear by semi-conducting polymer sensors. Comput. Electron. Agric., 26, 209–216.10.1016/S0168-1699(00)00073-9Search in Google Scholar
Pallottino, F., Costa, C., Antonucci, F., Strano, M. C., Calandra, M., Solaini, S. & Menesatti, P. (2012). Electronic nose application for determination of Penicillium digitatum in valencia oranges. J. Sci. Food Agric., 92, 2008–2012.10.1002/jsfa.5586Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Pan, L., Zhang, W., Zhu, N., Mao, S. & Tu, K. (2014). Early detection and classification of pathogenic fungal disease in post-harvest strawberry fruit by electronic nose and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Food Res. Int., 62, 162–168.10.1016/j.foodres.2014.02.020Search in Google Scholar
Pani, P., Leva, A. A., Riva, M., Maestrelli, A. & Torreggiani, D. (2008). Influence of an osmotic pre-treatment on structure-property relationships of air-dehydrated tomato slices. J. Food Eng., 86, 105–112.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.09.017Search in Google Scholar
Parpinello, G. P., Fabbri, A., Domenichelli, S., Mesisca, V., Cavicchi, L. & Versari, A. (2007). Discrimination of apricot cultivars by gas multisensor array using an artificial neural network. Biosystems Engineering, 97, 371–378.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.02.017Search in Google Scholar
Parpinello, G. P., Nunziatini, G., Rombolà, A. D., Gottardi, F. & Versari, A. (2013). Relationship between sensory and NIR spectroscopy in consumer preference of table grape (cv Italia). Postharvest Biol. Technol., 83, 47–53.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.03.013Search in Google Scholar
Pathange, L. P., Mallikarjunan, P., Marini, R. P., O’Keefe, S. & Vaughan, D. (2006). Non-destructive evaluation of apple maturity using an electronic nose system. J. Food Eng., 77, 1018–1023.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.08.034Search in Google Scholar
Paz, P., Sánchez, M.-T., Pérez-Marín, D., Guerrero, J. E. & Garrido-Varo, A. (2009). Instantaneous quantitative and qualitative assessment of pear quality using near infrared spectroscopy. Comput. Electron. Agr., 69, 24–32.10.1016/j.compag.2009.06.008Search in Google Scholar
Pearce, T. C., Schiffman, S. S., Nagle, H. T. & Gardner, J. W. (2003). In Handbook of machine olfaction. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Search in Google Scholar
Peirs, A., Lammertyn, J., Ooms, K. & Nicolaï, B. M. (2001). Prediction of the optimal picking date of different apple cultivars by means of VIS/NIR-spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 21, 189–199.10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00145-9Search in Google Scholar
Plutowska, B. & Wardencki, W. (2007). Aromagrams-Aromatic profile in the appreciation of food quality. Food Chem., 101, 845–872.10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.12.028Search in Google Scholar
Principe, J. C., Euliano, N. R. & Lefebvre, W. C. (2000). In Neural and adaptivesystems: Fundamentals through simulations. NY: John Wiley and Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Qing, Z., Ji, B. & Zude, M. (2007). Wavelength selection for predicting physicochemical properties of apple fruit based on near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Food Quality, 30, 511–526.10.1111/j.1745-4557.2007.00139.xSearch in Google Scholar
Qiu, S. & Wang, J. (2015). Application of sensory evaluation, HS-SPME GC-MS, e-nose, and e-tongue for quality detection in citrus fruits. J. Food Sci., 80, S2296–S2304.10.1111/1750-3841.13012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Rico, D., Martin-Diana, A. B., Barat, J. M. & Barry-Rian, C. (2007). Extending and measuring the quality of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 18, 373–386.10.1016/j.tifs.2007.03.011Search in Google Scholar
Riva, M., Benedetti, S. & Mannino, S. (2001). Shelf life of fresh cut vegetables as measured by an electronic nose: Preliminary study. Ital. J. Food Sci., 13, 201–212.Search in Google Scholar
Rizzolo, A., Bianchi, G., Vanoli, M., Lurie, S., Spinelli, L. & Torricelli, A. (2013). Electronic nose to detect volatile compound profile and quality changes in ‘Spring Belle’ peach (Prunus persica L.) during cold storage in relation to fruit optical properties measured by time-resolved reflectance spectroscopy. J. Agric. Food Chem., 61, 1671–1685.10.1021/jf302808gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Rutolo, M. F., Iliescu, D., Clarkson, J. P. & Covington, J. A. (2016). Early identification of potato storage disease using an array of metal-oxide based gas sensors. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 116, 50–58.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.12.028Search in Google Scholar
Saevels, S., Lammertyn, J., Berna, A. Z., Veraverbeke, E. A., Di Natale, C. & Nicolai, B. M. (2003). Electronic nose as a non-destructive tool to evaluate the optimal harvest date of apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 30, 3–14.10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00059-0Search in Google Scholar
Saevels, S., Lammertyn, J., Berna, A. Z., Veraverbeke, E. A., Di Natale, C. & Nicolai, B. M. (2004). An electronic nose and a mass spectrometry-based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 31, 9–19.10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00129-7Search in Google Scholar
Sanaeifar, A., Mohtasebi, S. S., Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M. & Ahmadi, H. (2016). Application of MOS based electronic nose for the prediction of banana quality properties. Measurement, 82, 105–114.10.1016/j.measurement.2015.12.041Search in Google Scholar
Sankaran, S., Mishra, A., Ehsani, R. & Davis, C. (2010). A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases. Comput. Electron. Agr., 72, 1–13.10.1016/j.compag.2010.02.007Search in Google Scholar
Santonico, M., Bellincontro, A., De Santis, D., Di Natale, C. & Mencarelli, F. (2010). Electronic nose to study postharvest dehydration of wine grapes. Food Chem., 121, 789–796.10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.086Search in Google Scholar
Saranwong, S., Sornsrivichai, J. & Kawano, S. (2003). Performance of a portable near infrared instrument for Brix value determination of intact mango fruit. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc., 11, 175–181.10.1255/jnirs.364Search in Google Scholar
Saranwong, S., Sornsrivichai, J. & Kawano, S. (2004). Prediction of ripe-stage eating quality of mango fruit from its harvest quality measured nondestructively by near infrared spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 31, 137–145.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.08.007Search in Google Scholar
Schmilovitch, Z., Mizrach, A., Hoffman, A., Egozi, H. & Fuchs, Y. (2000). Determination of mango physiological indices by near-infrared spectrometry. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 19, 245–252.10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00102-2Search in Google Scholar
Siroli, L., Patrignani, F., Serrazanetti, D. I., Tabanelli, G., Montanari, C., Tappi, S., Rocculi, P., Gardini, F. & Lanciotti, R. (2014). Efficacy of natural antimicrobials to prolong the shelf-life of minimally processed apples packaged in modified atmosphere. Food Control, 46, 403–411.10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.05.049Search in Google Scholar
Slaughter, D. C. (2009). In Nondestructive maturity assessment methods for mango: A review of literature and identification of future research needs. Orlando, FL, USA: National Mango Board.Search in Google Scholar
Solis-Solis, H. M., Calderon-Santoyo, M., Gutierrez-Martinez, P., Schorr-Galindo, S. & Ragazzo-Sanchez, J. A. (2007). Discrimination of eight varieties of apricot (Prunus armeniaca) by electronic nose, LLE and SPME using GC–MS and multivariate analysis. Sens. Actuators B, 125, 415–421.10.1016/j.snb.2007.02.035Search in Google Scholar
Soliva-Fortuny, R. C. & Martin-Belloso, O. (2003). New advances in extending the shelf-life of fresh-cut fruits: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 14, 341–353.10.1016/S0924-2244(03)00054-2Search in Google Scholar
Stark, E. K. & Luchter, K. (2003). Diversity in NIR instrumentation. Near infrared spectroscopy: Proceeding of the 11th international conference, (pp. 55–66). NIR PublicationChichester, UK.Search in Google Scholar
Su, M., Zhang, B., Ye, Z., Chen, K., Guo, J., Gu, X. & Shen, J. (2013). Pulp volatiles measured by an electronic nose are related to harvest season, TSS concentration and TSS/TA ratio among 39 peaches and nectarines. Sci. Hortic., 150, 146–153.10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.020Search in Google Scholar
Sun, D. W. (2010). In Hyperspectral imaging for food quality analysis and control (1st ed.). London: Academic.Search in Google Scholar
Temma, T., Hanamatsu, K. & Shinoki, F. (2002). Development of a portable near infrared sugar-measuring instrument. J. Near Infrared Spec., 10, 77–84.10.1255/jnirs.324Search in Google Scholar
Torreggiani, D. & Bertolo, G. (2004). Present and future in process control and optimization of osmotic dehydration. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Advances in food and nutrition research (Vol. 48, pp. 173–238). London: Elsevier, Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Torri, L., Sinelli, N. & Limbo, S. (2010). Shelf life evaluation of fresh-cut pineapple by using an electronic nose. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 56, 239–245.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.01.012Search in Google Scholar
Trirongjitmoah, S., Juengmunkong, Z., Srikulnath, K. & Somboon, P. (2015). Classification of garlic cultivars using an electronic nose. Comput. Electron. Agric., 113, 148–153.10.1016/j.compag.2015.02.007Search in Google Scholar
Walsh, K. B., Guthrie, J. A. & Burney, J. W. (2000). Application of commercially available, low-cost, miniaturised NIR spectrometers to the assessment of the sugar content of intact fruit. Funct. Plant Biol., 27, 1175–1186.10.1071/PP99111Search in Google Scholar
Wang, W. & Paliwal, J. (2007). Near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging in food quality and safety. Sens. Instrum. Food Qual. Saf., 1, 193–207.10.1007/s11694-007-9022-0Search in Google Scholar
Wang, J., Teng, B. & Yu, Y. (2004). Pear dynamic characteristics and firmness detection. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 218, 289–294.10.1007/s00217-003-0850-9Search in Google Scholar
Williams, P. & Norris, K. (2001). In Near-Infrared technology in the agricultural and food industries (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: American Association of Cereal Chemists.Search in Google Scholar
Williams, P. C. & Sobering, D. C. (1996). How do we do it: A brief summary of the methods we use in developing near infrared calibrations. In A. M .C. Davies & P. C. Williams (Eds.), Near infrared spectroscopy: The future waves (pp. 185–188). Chichester, UK: NIR Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, A. D. (2013). Diverse applications of electronic-nose technologies in agriculture and forestry. Sensors, 13, 2295–2348.10.3390/s130202295Search in Google Scholar
Wold, S., Sjöström, M. & Eriksson, L. (2001). PLS-regression: A basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 58, 109–130.10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1Search in Google Scholar
Wu, D., He, Y., Nie, P., Cao, F. & Bao, Y. (2010). Hybrid variable selection in visible and near-infrared spectral analysis for non-invasive quality determination of grape juice. Anal. Chim. Acta, 659, 229–237.10.1016/j.aca.2009.11.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Xiaobo, Z., Jiewen, Z., Povey, M. J. W., Holmes, M. & Hanpin, M. (2010). Variables selection methods in near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta, 667, 14–32.10.1016/j.aca.2010.03.048Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Xu, H., Liu, Z., Cai, W. & Shao, X. (2009). A wavelength selection method based on randomization test for near-infrared spectral analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 97, 189–193.10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.04.006Search in Google Scholar
Xu, H., Qi, B., Sun, T., Fu, X. & Ying, Y. (2012). Variable selection in visible and near-infrared spectra: Application to on-line determination of sugar content in pears. J. Food Eng., 109, 142–147.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.09.022Search in Google Scholar
Zakaria, A., Shakaff, A. Y. M., Masnan, M. J., Saad, F. S. A., Adom, A. H., Ahmad, M. N., Jaafar, M. N., Abdullah, A. H. & Kamarudin, L. M. (2012). Improved maturity and ripeness classifications of Magnifera indica cv. harumanis mangoes through sensor fusion of an electronic nose and acoustic sensor. Sensors, 12, 6023–6048.10.3390/s120506023Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Zhang, H., Chang, M., Wang, J. & Ye, S. (2008a). Evaluation of peach quality indices using an electronic nose by MLR, QPST and BP network. Sens. Actuators B., 134, 332–338.10.1016/j.snb.2008.05.008Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Wang, J. & Ye, S. (2008b). Predictions of acidity, soluble solids and firmness of pear using electronic nose technique. J. Food Eng., 86, 370–378.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.08.026Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, B., Xi, W., Wei, W., Shen, J., Ferguson, I. & Chen, K. (2011). Chenges in aroma-related volatiles and gene expression during low temperature storage and subsequent shelf-life of peach fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 60, 7–16.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.09.012Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, H., Wang, J., Ye, S. & Chang, M. (2012). Application of electronic nose and statistical analysis to predict quality indices of peach. Food Bioprocess Technol., 5, 65–72.10.1007/s11947-009-0295-7Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Tu, K., Tu, S., Liu, M., Su, J. & Hou, Y. P. (2010). A combination of heat treatment and Pichia guilliermondii prevents cherry tomato spoilage by fungi. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 137, 106–110.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Zou, X., Zhao, J., Povey, M. J., Holmes, M. & Mao, H. (2010). Variables selection methods in near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta, 667, 14–32.10.1016/j.aca.2010.03.048Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Zude, M. (2003). Non-destructive prediction of banana fruit quality using VIS/NIR spectroscopy. Fruits, 58, 135–142.10.1051/fruits:2003001Search in Google Scholar
Zude, M., Herold, B., Roger, J. M., Bellon-Maurel, V. & Landahl, S. (2006). Non-destructive tests on the prediction of apple fruit flesh firmness and soluble solids content on tree and in shelf life. J. Food Eng., 77, 254–260.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.027Search in Google Scholar
Zude, M., Birlouez-Aragon, I., Paschold, P. J. & Rutledge, D. N. (2007). Non-invasive spectrophotometric sensing of carrot quality from harvest to consumption. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 45, 30–37.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.01.010Search in Google Scholar
Zude-Sasse, M., Truppel, I. & Herold, B. (2002). An approach to non-destructive apple fruit chlorophyll determination. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 25, 123–133.10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00173-9Search in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Electronic nose and visible-near infrared spectroscopy in fruit and vegetable monitoring
- Recent developments in microfluidic paper-, cloth-, and thread-based electrochemical devices for analytical chemistry
- Bioanalytical applications of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: de novo molecular identification
Articles in the same Issue
- Electronic nose and visible-near infrared spectroscopy in fruit and vegetable monitoring
- Recent developments in microfluidic paper-, cloth-, and thread-based electrochemical devices for analytical chemistry
- Bioanalytical applications of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: de novo molecular identification