Home Advancement of energy harvesting using smart materials and composites
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Advancement of energy harvesting using smart materials and composites

  • Eris E. Supeni EMAIL logo , Azizan As’arry and Haider Jaafar Chilabi
Published/Copyright: July 25, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study explores advancements in energy harvesting using smart materials and composite structures, focusing on integrating shape memory alloys (SMAs) into wind turbine blades. The research investigates the structural and thermo-mechanical behavior of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites and SMA wires, emphasizing their potential in improving blade adaptability and stress recovery. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and experimental methods are utilized to evaluate deflection, load correlation, and actuation efficiency. Results demonstrate that suspended SMA wires enhance deflection recovery with lower energy loss compared to embedded configurations. A neural network model predicts deformation behavior based on load, current, and wire count. Additionally, SMA integration improves the power coefficient (Cp), bringing turbine efficiency closer to the Betz limit. Despite challenges such as nonuniform prestrain and material degradation at attachment points, this study confirms the feasibility of SMA-driven adaptive blades for wind energy applications. Future work includes optimizing SMA deployment in real-scale wind turbines through dynamic analysis and aerodynamic performance testing.


Corresponding author: Eris E. Supeni, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor 43400, Malaysia, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the editors – S.M. Sapuan, Mohd Roshdi Hassan, Eris Elianddy Supeni, and Azizan As’arry – for their valuable guidance and thorough review of this article prior to its publication.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Dam, V, Mayda, E, Chao, D, Jackson, K, Zuteck, M, Berry, D. Innovative structural and aerodynamic design approaches for large wind turbine blades. ASME/AIAA Wind Energy Symp 2005;0973.Search in Google Scholar

2. Chopra, I. Review of state of art of smart structures and integrated system. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut J 2002;40:2145–87. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1561.Search in Google Scholar

3. Straub, K. A feasibilty study of using smart materials for rotor control. Smart Mater Struct 1996;5:1–5.10.1088/0964-1726/5/1/002Search in Google Scholar

4. Enekl, B, Klopper, V, Preibler, D, Full scale rotor with piezoelectric actuated blade flaps. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual forum of the European Rotorcraft Forum, Bristol, UK, 17–19 September 2002. Royal Aeronautical Society, London, UK; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

5. Roth, D, Enenkl, B, Dietrich, O, Active rotor control by flaps for vibration reduction – full scale demonstrator and first flight test results In: Proceedings of the 32nd European Rotorcraft Forum. Maastricht, The Netherlands; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

6. Barlas, T, Kuik, G. State of the art and prospectives of smart rotor control for wind turbines. J Phys Conf 2007;75:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/75/1/012080.Search in Google Scholar

7. Nakafuji, DY, van Dam, CP, Michel, J, Morrison, P. Load control for wind turbines – a non-traditional microtab approach. In: Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reston, Virginia, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2002, pp. 321–30.10.1115/WIND2002-54Search in Google Scholar

8. Hartl, D, Lagoudas, D. ‘Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys proc. Imeche vol. 221 part g: J. aerospace engineering’. Proc IMechE Aero Eng 2007;221. PART g. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100jaero211.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mabe, J, Cabell, R, Butler, G. Design and control of morphing chevron for take-off and cruise noise reduction. AIAA Aeroacoustics Conf 2005;26:1–15.10.2514/6.2005-2889Search in Google Scholar

10. Jensen, F, Falzon, B, Ankersen, J, Stang, H. Structural testing and numerical simulation of a 34 m composite wind turbine blade. Compos Struct 2006;76:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.008.Search in Google Scholar

11. Simulia. ABAQUS release note 6.12. USA: Dassault Systems; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

12. ASTM International. 2010. Standard test method for transformation temperature of Nickel–Titanium alloys by thermal analysis ASTM F2004‑05. West Conshohocken, PA: Committee F04, ASTM International.Search in Google Scholar

13. Daniel, A, Calin, M, Ion, V, Marius, T, Cornel, M. Contributions to design of systems actuated shape memory active elements. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2010;7:222–7.Search in Google Scholar

14. Slootweg, J, Polinder, H, Kling, W. Representing wind turbine electrical generating systems in fundamental frequency simulations. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 2003;18:516–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/tec.2003.816593.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-03-30
Accepted: 2025-05-28
Published Online: 2025-07-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2024-0021/html
Scroll to top button