Home Biomass burning and biochar: developments in Sub-Saharan Africa
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Biomass burning and biochar: developments in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Adefarati Oloruntoba EMAIL logo , Ahmed Olalekan Omoniyi , Olusanya Olaseinde , Jackson Nkoh Nkoh , Emmanuel Sunday Okeke , Fidelis Odedishemi Ajibade , Oluremi Ishola Adeniran , Sunday Adebayo Kolawole and Kazeem Paul Adekanye
Published/Copyright: July 31, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Biomass burning remains widespread in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), driven by a complex interplay of factors: technological limitations, colonial-era policies that contributed to deforestation, cultural practices, unmanaged waste disposal resulting in dumpsite fires, vegetation burning for land preparation, politically motivated fires from riots and protests, climate change-induced wildfires, and traditional cooking and heating practices rooted in poverty and insufficient land management strategies. This narrative review assesses biomass burning and biochar developments in SSA, highlighting the environmental impacts and viable mitigation strategies. Satellite data analysis reveals that Côte d’Ivoire experienced 122,014 agricultural fires from 2016 to 2019, peaking at 13,387 in February 2016. In 2019, Nigeria recorded 86,464 fires, resulting in approximately 0.019 Tg of black carbon emissions. Ghana reported 0.014 Tg of black carbon emissions, with burn scars comparable to Nigeria. Open vegetation burning in Zambia and Southern Africa during 2000 resulted in a burned area of 210,000–830,000 km2, emitting 18–31 Tg of carbon monoxide. SSA has a technically recoverable biomass of no less than 21,646 PJ, with approximately 1,986.5 PJ available from woody biomass, yet only 25 % of this resource is utilized, indicating significant underutilization. Biochar, derived from biomass, offers significant benefits for enhancing soil fertility, bioenergy production, carbon sequestration, and pollution control. Converting crop residues to biochar can mitigate up to 0.89 tons of CO2 per ton of residues. In Cameroon, transforming 2,000 kg of agricultural waste into biochar could prevent 939.7 kg CO2 eq emissions. However, SSA accounts for only 4.8 % of global biochar production, constrained by socio-economic, technological, and policy barriers. To improve biochar adoption and mitigate biomass burning impacts, this review recommends regional strategies including knowledge sharing, capacity building, policy incentives, public participation, sustainable management practices, and investment in bioenergy initiatives.


Corresponding author: Adefarati Oloruntoba, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, AB T2N 1N4, Canada, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor Liliana Mammino for their guidance and review of this article before its publication.

References

1. World Bank. Population, total Sub-Saharan Africa Data. World Bank; 2022. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=ZG.Search in Google Scholar

2. Archibald, S, Staver, AC, Levin, SA. Evolution of human-driven fire regimes in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012;109:847–52. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118648109.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Lammel, G, Heil, A, Stemmler, I, Dvorská, A, Klánová, J. On the contribution of biomass burning to POPs (PAHs and PCDDs) in air in Africa. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47:11616–24. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401499q.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Suriyawong, P, Chuetor, S, Samae, H, Piriyakarnsakul, S, Amin, M, Furuuchi, M, et al.. Airborne particulate matter from biomass burning in Thailand: recent issues, challenges, and options. Heliyon 2023;9:e14261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14261.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Strydom, S, Savage, MJ. Spatio-temporal analysis of fires in South Africa. South Afr J Sci 2016;112:8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150489.Search in Google Scholar

6. Xue, T, Geng, G, Han, Y, Wang, H, Li, J, Li, H, et al.. Open fire exposure increases the risk of pregnancy loss in South Asia. Nat Commun 2021;12:3205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23529-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Phairuang, W, Chetiyanukornkul, T, Suriyawong, P, Amin, M, Hata, M, Furuuchi, M, et al.. Characterizing chemical, environmental, and stimulated subcellular physical characteristics of size-fractionated PMs down to PM 0.1. Environ Sci Technol 2024;58:12368–78. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c01604.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Paluang, P, Thavorntam, W, Phairuang, W. The spatial–temporal emission of air pollutants from biomass burning during haze episodes in Northern Thailand. Fire 2024;7:122. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7040122.Search in Google Scholar

9. Phairuang, W, Chetiyanukornkul, T, Suriyawong, P, Ho, S, Paluang, P, Furuuchi, M, et al.. Daytime-nighttime variations in the concentration of PM0.1 carbonaceous particles during a biomass fire episode in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Particuology 2024;87:316–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2023.09.013.Search in Google Scholar

10. Tial, MKS, Suriyawong, P, Chetiyanukornkul, T, Paluang, P, Amin, M, Putri, RM, et al.. Characterization of PM0.1 mass concentrations and elemental and organic carbon in upper Southeast Asia. Atmos Pollut Res 2024;15:102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102157.Search in Google Scholar

11. Phairuang, W, Piriyakarnsakul, S, Inerb, M, Hongtieab, S, Thongyen, T, Chomanee, J, et al.. Ambient nanoparticles (PM0.1) mapping in Thailand. Atmosphere 2022;14:66. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010066.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ochieng, C, Vardoulakis, S, Tonne, C. Household air pollution following replacement of traditional open fire with an improved rocket type cookstove. Sci Total Environ 2017;580:440–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.233.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Vakkari, V, Beukes, JP, Dal Maso, M, Aurela, M, Josipovic, M, van Zyl, PG. Major secondary aerosol formation in southern African open biomass burning plumes. Nat Geosci 2018;11:580–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0170-0.Search in Google Scholar

14. CCAC. Open burning mapping in Nigeria and West Africa; 2021. https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/activity/open-burning-mapping-nigeria-and-west-africaCoted’Ivoire.Search in Google Scholar

15. CCAC. Open burning mapping for Côte d’Ivoire; 2021. https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/open-burning-mapping-côte-divoire-2015-2020.Search in Google Scholar

16. CCAC. Open burning mapping for Ghana; 2021. https://www.ccacoalition.org/en/resources/open-burning-mapping-ghana-2015-2019.Search in Google Scholar

17. Sohi, SP, Krull, E, Lopez-Capel, E, Bol, R. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 2010;105:47–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9.Search in Google Scholar

18. Fahmy, TYA, Fahmy, Y, Mobarak, F, El-Sakhawy, M, Abou-Zeid, RE. Biomass pyrolysis: past, present, and future. Environ Dev Sustain 2020;22:17–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0200-5.Search in Google Scholar

19. Lam, SS, Liew, RK, Cheng, CK, Rasit, N, Ooi, CK, Ma, NL, et al.. Pyrolysis production of fruit peel biochar for potential use in treatment of palm oil mill effluent. J Environ Manag 2018;213:400–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.092.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Zhu, L, Lei, H, Zhang, Y, Zhang, X, Bu, W, Wang, Y, et al.. A review of biochar derived from pyrolysis and its application in biofuel production. SF J Mater Chem Eng 2018;1:1–9.Search in Google Scholar

21. Bashir, M, Yu, X, Hassan, M, Makkawi, Y. Modeling and performance analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis in a solar-thermal reactor. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2017;5:3795–807. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02806.Search in Google Scholar

22. Nzediegwu, C, Naeth, MA, Chang, SX. Feedstock type drives surface property, demineralization and element leaching of nitric acid-activated biochars more than pyrolysis temperature. Bioresour Technol 2022;344:126316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126316.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Ajibade, OF, Wang, H-C, Guadie, A, Ajibade, FT, Fang, Y-K, Muhammad Adeel Sharif, H, et al.. Total nitrogen removal in biochar amended non-aerated vertical flow constructed wetlands for secondary wastewater effluent with low C/N ratio: microbial community structure and dissolved organic carbon release conditions. Bioresour Technol 2021;322:124430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124430.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Wang, S, Kwak, J-H, Islam, MS, Naeth, MA, Gamal El-Din, M, Chang, SX. Biochar surface complexation and Ni(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) adsorption in aqueous solutions depend on feedstock type. Sci Total Environ 2020;712:136538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136538.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Kizito, S, Luo, H, Lu, J, Bah, H, Dong, R, Wu, S. Role of nutrient-enriched biochar as a soil amendment during maize growth: exploring practical alternatives to recycle agricultural residuals and to reduce chemical fertilizer demand. Sustainability 2019;11:3211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113211.Search in Google Scholar

26. Yuan, H-Y, Ding, L-J, Zama, EF, Liu, P-P, Hozzein, WN, Zhu, Y-G. Biochar modulates methanogenesis through electron syntrophy of microorganisms with ethanol as a substrate. Environ Sci Technol 2018;52:12198–207. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04121.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Zama, EF, Reid, BJ, Sun, G-X, Yuan, H-Y, Li, X-M, Zhu, Y-G. Silicon (Si) biochar for the mitigation of arsenic (As) bioaccumulation in spinach (Spinacia oleracean) and improvement in the plant growth. J Clean Prod 2018;189:386–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.056.Search in Google Scholar

28. Agrafioti, E, Bouras, G, Kalderis, D, Diamadopoulos, E. Biochar production by sewage sludge pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2013;101:72–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

29. Ahmad, M, Lee, SS, Dou, X, Mohan, D, Sung, J-K, Yang, JE, et al.. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresour Technol 2012;118:536–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Kameyama, K, Miyamoto, T, Iwata, Y, Shiono, T. Influences of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature on the nitrate adsorption of biochar. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2016;62:180–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2015.1136553.Search in Google Scholar

31. Keiluweit, M, Kleber, M, Sparrow, MA, Simoneit, BRT, Prahl, FG. Solvent-extractable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar: influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock. Environ Sci Technol 2012;46:9333–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302125k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Mohan, D, Rajput, S, Singh, VK, Steele, PH, Pittman, CU. Modeling and evaluation of chromium remediation from water using low cost bio-char, a green adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 2011;188:319–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.127.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Uchimiya, M, Wartelle, LH, Klasson, KT, Fortier, CA, Lima, IM. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on biochar property and function as a heavy metal sorbent in soil. J Agric Food Chem 2011;59:2501–10. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf104206c.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Liu, N, Charrua, AB, Weng, C-H, Yuan, X, Ding, F. Characterization of biochars derived from agriculture wastes and their adsorptive removal of atrazine from aqueous solution: a comparative study. Bioresour Technol 2015;198:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.129.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. He, X, Yin, H, Han, L, Cui, R, Fang, C, Huang, G. Effects of biochar size and type on gaseous emissions during pig manure/wheat straw aerobic composting: insights into multivariate-microscale characterization and microbial mechanism. Bioresour Technol 2019;271:375–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Al-Wabel, MI, Al-Omran, A, El-Naggar, AH, Nadeem, M, Usman, ARA. Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour Technol 2013;131:374–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.165.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Suman, S, Gautam, S. Biochar derived from agricultural waste biomass act as a clean and alternative energy source of fossil fuel inputs. In: Energy systems and environment. London: InTech; 2018.10.5772/intechopen.73833Search in Google Scholar

38. Kloss, S, Zehetner, F, Dellantonio, A, Hamid, R, Ottner, F, Liedtke, V, et al.. Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. J Environ Qual 2012;41:990–1000. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0070.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Cantrell, KB, Hunt, PG, Uchimiya, M, Novak, JM, Ro, KS. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 2012;107:419–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.084.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Yevich, R, Logan, JA. An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2003;17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GB001952.Search in Google Scholar

41. Goswami, SB, Mondal, R, Mandi, SK. Crop residue management options in rice–rice system: a review. Arch Agron Soil Sci 2020;66:1218–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1661994.Search in Google Scholar

42. Zanli, BLGL, Gbossou, KC, Tang, W, Kamoto, M, Chen, J. A review of biochar potential in Cote d’Ivoire in light of the challenges facing Sub-Saharan Africa. Biomass Bioenergy 2022;165:106581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106581.Search in Google Scholar

43. Mashingaidze, TM. Risk and vulnerability in an untamed landscape the Zimbabwean Tonga in the aftermath of the Kariba Dam induced displacements, 1956–1980s. J Hum Secur Stud 2020;9.Search in Google Scholar

44. Bamwesigye, D, Kupec, P, Chekuimo, G, Pavlis, J, Asamoah, O, Darkwah, SA, et al.. Charcoal and wood biomass utilization in Uganda: the socioeconomic and environmental dynamics and implications. Sustainability 2020;12:8337. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208337.Search in Google Scholar

45. Zubkova, M, Boschetti, L, Abatzoglou, JT, Giglio, L. Changes in fire activity in Africa from 2002 to 2016 and their potential drivers. Geophys Res Lett 2019;46:7643–53. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083469.Search in Google Scholar

46. Wu, J, Kong, S, Yan, Y, Yao, L, Yan, Q, Liu, D, et al.. Neglected biomass burning emissions of air pollutants in China – views from the corncob burning test, emission estimation, and simulations. Atmos Environ 2022;278:119082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119082.Search in Google Scholar

47. Li, W, Yu, Y, He, Q, Xu, D, Qi, Y, Deng, X. Impact of clean energy use on the subjective health of household members: empirical evidence from rural China. Energy 2023;263:126006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126006.Search in Google Scholar

48. Sekey, W, Obirikorang, KA, Boadu, KB, Gyampoh, BA, Nantwi-Mensah, A, Israel, EY, et al.. Mangrove plantation and fuelwood supply chain dynamics in the Keta Lagoon complex Ramsar site, Ghana. Wetl Ecol Manag 2023;31:143–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-022-09906-z.Search in Google Scholar

49. Kamwilu, E, Duguma, LA, Orero, L. The potentials and challenges of achieving sustainability through charcoal producer Associations in Kenya: a missed opportunity? Sustainability 2021;13:2288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042288.Search in Google Scholar

50. Pan, X, Ichoku, C, Chin, M, Bian, H, Darmenov, A, Colarco, P, et al.. Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model. Atmos Chem Phys 2020;20:969–94. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-969-2020.Search in Google Scholar

51. Almsatar, T. Environmental issues of biomass-burning in Sub-Saharan African countries. In: Biomass burning in Sub-Saharan Africa. Netherlands: Springer; 2020:pp. 1–1410.1007/978-94-007-0808-2_1Search in Google Scholar

52. Aemro, YB, Moura, P, de Almeida, AT. Inefficient cooking systems a challenge for sustainable development: a case of rural areas of Sub-Saharan Africa. Environ Dev Sustain 2021;23:14697–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01266-7.Search in Google Scholar

53. Akagi, SK, Yokelson, RJ, Wiedinmyer, C, Alvarado, MJ, Reid, JS, Karl, T, et al.. Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models. Atmos Chem Phys 2011;11:4039–72. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011.Search in Google Scholar

54. De Sales, F, Xue, Y, Okin, GS. Impact of burned areas on the northern African seasonal climate from the perspective of regional modeling. Clim Dyn 2016;47:3393–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2522-4.Search in Google Scholar

55. Govender, N, Trollope, WSW, Van Wilgen, BW. The effect of fire season, fire frequency, rainfall and management on fire intensity in savanna vegetation in South Africa. J Appl Ecol 2006;43:748–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01184.x.Search in Google Scholar

56. Archibald, S, Roy, DP, Van Wilgen, BW, Scholes, RJ. What limits fire? An examination of drivers of burnt area in Southern Africa. Glob Change Biol 2009;15:613–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01754.x.Search in Google Scholar

57. Kraaij, T, Baard, JA, Arndt, J, Vhengani, L, van Wilgen, BW. An assessment of climate, weather, and fuel factors influencing a large, destructive wildfire in the Knysna region, South Africa. Fire Ecology 2018;14:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-018-0001-0.Search in Google Scholar

58. Raihan, A, Pavel, MI, Muhtasim, DA, Farhana, S, Faruk, O, Paul, A. The role of renewable energy use, technological innovation, and forest cover toward green development: evidence from Indonesia. Innov Green Dev 2023;2:100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100035.Search in Google Scholar

59. Čukić, I, Kypridemos, C, Evans, AW, Pope, D, Puzzolo, E. Towards sustainable development goal 7 “universal access to clean modern energy”: national strategy in Rwanda to scale clean cooking with bottled gas. Energies 2021;14:4582. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154582.Search in Google Scholar

60. Mishra, S, Tripathi, SN, Kanawade, VP, Haslett, SL, Dada, L, Ciarelli, G, et al.. Rapid night-time nanoparticle growth in Delhi driven by biomass-burning emissions. Nat Geosci 2023;16:224–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01138-x.Search in Google Scholar

61. Mueller, W, Loh, M, Vardoulakis, S, Johnston, HJ, Steinle, S, Precha, N, et al.. Ambient particulate matter and biomass burning: an ecological time series study of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital visits in northern Thailand. Environ Health 2020;19:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00629-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

62. Kumar, P, Singh, AB, Arora, T, Singh, S, Singh, R. Critical review on emerging health effects associated with the indoor air quality and its sustainable management. Sci Total Environ 2023;872:162163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162163.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

63. Nardocci, AC, Nogueira, T, de Almeida Piai, K, Cavendish, TA, Kumar, P. Indoor environment exposure and children’s health. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2023;32:100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2023.100449.Search in Google Scholar

64. Phiri, YVA, Wu, M-M, Chen, Y-H, Zou, M-L, Jiang, C-B, Wu, C-D, et al.. Environmental determinants of household microbial and allergen levels in the Greater Taipei Area. Build Environ 2023;230:110003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110003.Search in Google Scholar

65. Vanker, A, Barnett, W, Chartier, R, MacGinty, R, Zar, HJ. Personal monitoring of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure in mothers and young children in a South African birth cohort study – a pilot study. Atmos Environ 2023;294:119513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119513.Search in Google Scholar

66. Gladović, A, Petrović, B, Vukelić, D, Buha Djordjevic, A, Ćurčić, M, Đukić-Ćosić, D, et al.. Carcinogenic and human health risk assessment of children’s and adults’ exposure to toxic metal(oid)s from air PM10 in critical sites of the Republic of Serbia. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2023;30:61753–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26375-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

67. Adhikar, P, Buddhacharya, M, Jha, N, Yadav, DK. Prevalence of biomass use and its effect on the respiratory health of women residing in Eastern Terai Region of Nepal. Annapurna J Health Sci 2023;3:22–7. https://doi.org/10.52910/ajhs.100.Search in Google Scholar

68. Weber, E, Adu-Bonsaffoh, K, Vermeulen, R, Klipstein-Grobusch, K, Grobbee, DE, Browne, JL, et al.. Household fuel use and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a Ghanaian cohort study. Reprod Health 2020;17:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0878-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

69. Pullabhotla, HK, Zahid, M, Heft-Neal, S, Rathi, V, Burke, M. Global biomass fires and infant mortality. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2023;120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218210120.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

70. Ogwu, MC, Iyiola, AO, Izah, SC. Overview of African biological resources and environment. In: Sustainable utilization and conservation of Africa’s biological resources and environment. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023:1–31 pp.10.1007/978-981-19-6974-4_1Search in Google Scholar

71. Saliu, AO, Komolafe, OO, Bamidele, CO, Raimi, MO. The value of biodiversity to sustainable development in Africa. In: Sustainable utilization and conservation of Africa’s biological resources and environment. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023:269–94 pp.10.1007/978-981-19-6974-4_10Search in Google Scholar

72. Bjornlund, V, Bjornlund, H, Van Rooyen, AF. Why agricultural production in Sub-Saharan Africa remains low compared to the rest of the world – a historical perspective. Int J Water Resour Dev 2020;36:S20–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1739512.Search in Google Scholar

73. Hengl, T, Heuvelink, GBM, Kempen, B, Leenaars, JGB, Walsh, MG, Shepherd, KD, et al.. Mapping soil properties of Africa at 250 m resolution: random forests significantly improve current predictions. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125814. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125814.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

74. Mukhopadhyay, S, Biswas, PK, Mondal, S, Mondal, S. Effect of graded saturation of phosphorus fixing capacity of soil on yield and yield attributes of maize (Zea mays). Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol 2018;11. https://doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.06.2018.5.Search in Google Scholar

75. Yuan, JH, Xu, RK, Qian, W, Wang, RH. Comparison of the ameliorating effects on an acidic ultisol between four crop straws and their biochars. J Soils Sediments 2011;11:741–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0365-0.Search in Google Scholar

76. Yuan, JH, Xu, RK. Effects of biochars generated from crop residues on chemical properties of acid soils from tropical and subtropical China. Soil Res 2012;50:570. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR12118.Search in Google Scholar

77. Zhao, W, Liang, B, Yang, X, Zhou, J. Fate of residual 15 N-labeled fertilizer in dryland farming systems on soils of contrasting fertility. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2015;61:846–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2015.1066232.Search in Google Scholar

78. Shi, R, Ni, N, Nkoh, JN, Li, J, Xu, R, Qian, W. Beneficial dual role of biochars in inhibiting soil acidification resulting from nitrification. Chemosphere 2019;234:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.030.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

79. Shi, RY, Ni, N, Nkoh, JN, Dong, Y, Zhao, WR, Pan, X-Y, et al.. Biochar retards Al toxicity to maize (Zea mays L.) during soil acidification: the effects and mechanisms. Sci Total Environ 2020;719:137448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137448.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

80. Nkoh, JN, Baquy, MA-A, Mia, S, Shi, R, Kamran, MA, Mehmood, K, et al.. A critical-systematic review of the interactions of biochar with soils and the observable outcomes. Sustainability 2021;13:13726. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413726.Search in Google Scholar

81. Zhao, W, Li, J, Deng, K, Shi, R, Jiang, J, Hong, Z, et al.. Effects of crop straw biochars on aluminum species in soil solution as related with the growth and yield of canola (Brassica napus L.) in an acidic ultisol under field condition. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2020;27:30178–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09330-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

82. Ndiate, NI, Qun, CL, Nkoh, JN. Importance of soil amendments with biochar and/or Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi to mitigate aluminum toxicity in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) on an acidic soil: a greenhouse study. Heliyon 2022;8:e09009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

83. Kätterer, T, Roobroeck, D, Andrén, O, Kimutai, G, Karltun, E, Kirchmann, H, et al.. Biochar addition persistently increased soil fertility and yields in maize-soybean rotations over 10 years in sub-humid regions of Kenya. Field Crops Res 2019;235:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.015.Search in Google Scholar

84. Akinnuoye-Adelabu, DB, Steenhuisen, S, Bredenhand, E. Improving pea quality with vermicompost tea and aqueous biochar: prospects for sustainable farming in Southern Africa. South Afr J Bot 2019;123:278–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.03.009.Search in Google Scholar

85. MacCarthy, DS, Darko, E, Nartey, EK, Adiku, SGK, Tettey, A. Integrating biochar and inorganic fertilizer improves productivity and profitability of irrigated rice in Ghana, West Africa. Agronomy 2020;10:904. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060904.Search in Google Scholar

86. Guo, Z, Bai, G, Huang, B, Cai, N, Guo, P, Chen, L. Preparation and application of a novel biochar-supported red mud catalyst: active sites and catalytic mechanism. J Hazard Mater 2021;408:124802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124802.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

87. Nelson, NO, Agudelo, SC, Yuan, W, Gan, J. Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in biochar-amended soils. Soil Sci 2011;176:218–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3182171eac.Search in Google Scholar

88. Glaser, B, Lehr, V-I. Biochar effects on phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019;9:9338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45693-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

89. Fonseca, AA, Santos, DA, Passos, RR, Andrade, FV, Rangel, OJP. Phosphorus availability and grass growth in biochar‐modified acid soil: a study excluding the effects of soil pH. Soil Use Manag 2020;36:714–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12609.Search in Google Scholar

90. Baquy, MA-A, Nkoh, JN, Alam, M, Masud, MM. Biochar application to soils to improve the management of irrigation water. In: Sustainable agriculture reviews 61: biochar to improve crop production and decrease plant stress under a changing climate. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023.10.1007/978-3-031-26983-7_12Search in Google Scholar

91. Toková, L, Igaz, D, Horák, J, Aydin, E. Effect of biochar application and re-application on soil bulk density, porosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity, water content and soil water availability in a silty loam haplic luvisol. Agronomy 2020;10:1005. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10071005.Search in Google Scholar

92. Starr, M, Deng, B, Helenius, J. AquaCrop-simulated response of sorghum biomass and grain yield to biochar amendment in South Sudan. Agronomy 2020;10:67. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010067.Search in Google Scholar

93. Nyambo, P, Chiduza, C, Araya, T. Carbon input and maize productivity as influenced by tillage, crop rotation, residue management and biochar in a semiarid region in South Africa. Agronomy 2020;10:705. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050705.Search in Google Scholar

94. Mona, S, Malyan, SK, Saini, N, Deepak, B, Pugazhendhi, A, Kumar, SS. Towards sustainable agriculture with carbon sequestration, and greenhouse gas mitigation using algal biochar. Chemosphere 2021;275:129856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129856.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

95. Cui, L, Liu, Y, Yan, J, Hina, K, Hussain, Q, Qiu, T, et al.. Revitalizing coastal saline-alkali soil with biochar application for improved crop growth. Ecol Eng 2022;179:106594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106594.Search in Google Scholar

96. Ndiate, NI, Saeed, Q, Haider, FU, Liqun, C, Nkoh, JN, Mustafa, A. Co-application of biochar and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi improves salinity tolerance, growth and lipid metabolism of maize (Zea mays L.) in an alkaline soil. Plants 2021;10:2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112490.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

97. Guo, J, Chen, B. Insights on the molecular mechanism for the recalcitrance of biochars: interactive effects of carbon and silicon components. Environ Sci Technol 2014;48:9103–12. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405647e.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

98. Sundberg, C, Karltun, E, Gitau, JK, Kätterer, T, Kimutai, GM, Mahmoud, Y, et al.. Biochar from cookstoves reduces greenhouse gas emissions from smallholder farms in Africa. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Change 2020;25:953–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-020-09920-7.Search in Google Scholar

99. Gangil, S, Wakudkar, HM. Generation of bio-char from crop residues. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2013;3:566–70.Search in Google Scholar

100. Nguyen, DH, Biala, J, Grace, PR, Scheer, C, Rowlings, DW. Greenhouse gas emissions from sub-tropical agricultural soils after addition of organic by-products. SpringerPlus 2014;3:491. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-491.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

101. Balliu, A, Zheng, Y, Sallaku, G, Fernández, JA, Gruda, NS, Tuzel, Y. Environmental and cultivation factors affect the morphology, architecture and performance of root systems in soilless grown plants. Horticulturae 2021;7:243. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7080243.Search in Google Scholar

102. Allyson, S. Biochar production for carbon sequestration. Shanghai: Worcester Polytechnic Institute; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

103. Berazneva, J, Woolf, D, Lee, DR. Local lignocellulosic biofuel and biochar co-production in Sub-Saharan Africa: the role of feedstock provision in economic viability. Energy Econ 2021;93:105031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105031.Search in Google Scholar

104. Jeffery, S, Verheijen, FGA, Kammann, C, Abalos, D. Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 2016;101:251–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.021.Search in Google Scholar

105. Yu, O-Y, Raichle, B, Sink, S. Impact of biochar on the water holding capacity of loamy sand soil. Int J Energy Environ Eng 2013;4:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-44.Search in Google Scholar

106. Ajala, OA, Ajibade, FO, Oluwadipe, OR, Nwogwu, NA, Adelodun, B, Guadie, A, et al.. Microbial impact on climate-smart agricultural practices. In: Microbiome under changing climate. Sawston: Elsevier; 2022:203–36 pp.10.1016/B978-0-323-90571-8.00009-2Search in Google Scholar

107. Makate, C, Makate, M, Mango, N, Siziba, S. Increasing resilience of smallholder farmers to climate change through multiple adoption of proven climate-smart agriculture innovations. Lessons from Southern Africa. J Environ Manag 2019;231:858–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.069.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

108. Nkoh, JN, Ajibade, FO, Atakpa, EO, Baquy, MA-A, Mia, S, Odii, EC, et al.. Reduction of heavy metal uptake from polluted soils and associated health risks through biochar amendment: a critical synthesis. J Hazardous Mater Adv 2022;6:100086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100086.Search in Google Scholar

109. Yao, Y, Gao, B, Chen, J, Yang, L. Engineered biochar reclaiming phosphate from aqueous solutions: mechanisms and potential application as a slow-release fertilizer. Environ Sci Technol 2013;47:8700–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4012977.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

110. Jiang, Y-H, Li, A-Y, Deng, H, Ye, C-H, Wu, Y-Q, Linmu, Y-D, et al.. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus adsorption by Mg-loaded biochar from different feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 2019;276:183–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.079.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

111. Hu, Y, Chen, H. Biochar amendment in the green roof substrate improve air quality. E3S Web Conf 2022;350:01005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235001005.Search in Google Scholar

112. Gwenzi, W, Chaukura, N, Wenga, T, Mtisi, M. Biochars as media for air pollution control systems: contaminant removal, applications and future research directions. Sci Total Environ 2021;753:142249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142249.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

113. Lopez, G, Artetxe, M, Amutio, M, Alvarez, J, Bilbao, J, Olazar, M. Recent advances in the gasification of waste plastics. A critical overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;82:576–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.032Search in Google Scholar

114. Mishra, A, Kumar, M, Medhi, K, Thakur, IS. Biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). In: Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Belgium: Elsevier; 2020:399–427 pp.10.1016/B978-0-444-64309-4.00017-9Search in Google Scholar

115. Gwenzi, W, Chaukura, N, Mukome, FND, Machado, S, Nyamasoka, B. Biochar production and applications in Sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities, constraints, risks and uncertainties. J Environ Manag 2015;150:250–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

116. Karekezi, S, Kithyoma, W, Initiative, E. Renewable energy in Africa: prospects and limits. Workshop on African Energy Experts on Operationalizing the NEPAD Energy Initiative, June; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

117. Mapako, M, Mbewe, A. Renewables and energy for rural development in Sub-Saharan Africa. New York: Gutenberg Ltd; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

118. Oke, DM, Ibrahim, RL, Bokana, KG. Can renewable energy deliver African quests for sustainable development? J Develop Area 2021;55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2021.0022.Search in Google Scholar

119. Sakhiya, AK, Anand, A, Kaushal, P. Production, activation, and applications of biochar in recent times. Biochar 2020;2:253–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00047-1.Search in Google Scholar

120. Allison, JD, CardŽ, RT. Pheromone communication in moths: evolution, behavior, and application. California: Univ of California Press; 2016.10.1525/9780520964433Search in Google Scholar

121. Ahmad, J, Patuzzi, F, Rashid, U, Shahabz, M, Ngamcharussrivichai, C, Baratieri, M. Exploring untapped effect of process conditions on biochar characteristics and applications. Environ Technol Innovation 2021;21:101310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101310.Search in Google Scholar

122. Xie, Y, Wang, L, Li, H, Westholm, LJ, Carvalho, L, Thorin, E, et al.. A critical review on production, modification and utilization of biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2022;161:105405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105405.Search in Google Scholar

123. Hornung, A, Stenzel, F, Grunwald, J. Biochar – just a black matter is not enough. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2021;14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01284-5.Search in Google Scholar

124. Lee, M, Lin, Y-L, Chiueh, P-T, Den, W. Environmental and energy assessment of biomass residues to biochar as fuel: a brief review with recommendations for future bioenergy systems. J Clean Prod 2020;251:119714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119714.Search in Google Scholar

125. Vickers, NJ. Animal communication: when I’m calling you, will you answer too? Curr Biol 2017;27:R713–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.064.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

126. Gelardi, DL, Parikh, SJ. Soils and beyond: optimizing sustainability opportunities for biochar. Sustainability 2021;13:10079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810079.Search in Google Scholar

127. Zhu, X, Labianca, C, He, M, Luo, Z, Wu, C, You, S, et al.. Life-cycle assessment of pyrolysis processes for sustainable production of biochar from agro-residues. Bioresour Technol 2022;360:127601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127601.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

128. Alves, L. Energy for sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Bioclimatic architecture in warm climates. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019:335–48 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-12036-8_12Search in Google Scholar

129. Maishanu, SM, Sambo, AS, Garba, MM. Sustainable bioenergy development in Africa: issues, challenges, and the way forward. In: Sustainable bioenergy. Cambridge: Elsevier; 2019:49–87 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-817654-2.00003-4Search in Google Scholar

130. Wicke, B, Smeets, E, Watson, H, Faaij, A. The current bioenergy production potential of semi-arid and arid regions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Biomass Bioenergy 2011;35:2773–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.03.010.Search in Google Scholar

131. Lehmann, J, Joseph, S. Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. In: Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. New York: Routledge; 2015.10.4324/9780203762264Search in Google Scholar

132. Raboni, M, Viotti, P, Capodaglio, AG. A comprehensive analysis of the current and future role of biofuels for transport in the European Union (EU). Ambiente Água – An Interdiscip J Appl Sci 2015;10. https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.1492.Search in Google Scholar

133. Carvalho, F, Portugal-Pereira, J, Junginger, M, Szklo, A. Biofuels for maritime transportation: a spatial, techno-economic, and logistic analysis in Brazil, Europe, South Africa, and the USA. Energies 2021;14:4980. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164980.Search in Google Scholar

134. Nzotcha, U, Kenfack, J. Contribution of the wood-processing industry for sustainable power generation: viability of biomass-fuelled cogeneration in Sub-Saharan Africa. Biomass Bioenergy 2019;120:324–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

135. Chukwuka, SK, Akanmu, OA, Umukoro, O-JB, Asemoloye, DM, Odebode, CA. Biochar: a vital source for sustainable agriculture. In: Biostimulants in plant science. London: IntechOpen; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

136. Yeboah, S, Oteng-Darko, P, Adomako, J, Rauf Alhassan Malimanga, A. Biochar application for improved resource use and environmental quality. In: Applications of biochar for environmental safety. London: IntechOpen; 2020.10.5772/intechopen.92427Search in Google Scholar

137. Eisentraut, A. Sustainable production of second-generation biofuels: potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries; 2010. http://www.iea.org/papers/2010/second_generation_biofuels.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.oecdilibrary.org/docserver/download/fulltext/5kmh3njpt6r0.pdf?expires=1273069460&id=0000&accname=freeContent&checksum=D661E3BE377EC0E212A5647D5C6BFD13.Search in Google Scholar

138. Hirani, AH, Javed, N, Asif, M, Basu, SK, Kumar, A. A review on first- and second-generation biofuel productions. In: Biofuels: greenhouse gas mitigation and global warming. India: Springer; 2018. pp. 141–5410.1007/978-81-322-3763-1_8Search in Google Scholar

139. Richard, TL. Challenges in scaling up biofuels infrastructure. Science 2010;329:793–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189139.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

140. Robertson, GP, Hamilton, SK, Barham, BL, Dale, BE, Izaurralde, RC, Jackson, RD, et al.. Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: choices and outcomes. Science 2017;356. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2324.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

141. Zhang, T. Taking on all of the biomass for conversion. Science 2020;367:1305–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb1463.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

142. David, S. What do farmers think? Farmer evaluations of hedgerow intercropping under semi-arid conditions. Agrofor Syst 1995;32:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713845.Search in Google Scholar

143. Mutegi, JK, Mugendi, DN, Verchot, LV, Kung’u, JB. Combining Napier grass with leguminous shrubs in contour hedgerows controls soil erosion without competing with crops. Agrofor Syst 2008;74:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9152-3.Search in Google Scholar

144. Swinkels, RA, Shepherd, KD, Franzel, S, Ndufa, JK, Ohlsson, E, Sjogren, H. Assessing the adoption potential of hedgerow intercropping for improving soil fertility, Western Kenya. In: Trees on the farm: assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices in Africa. Wallingford: CABI Publishing; 2002:89–110 pp.10.1079/9780851995618.0089Search in Google Scholar

145. Kimetu, JM, Lehmann, J, Ngoze, SO, Mugendi, DN, Kinyangi, JM, Riha, S, et al.. Reversibility of soil productivity decline with organic matter of differing quality along a degradation gradient. Ecosystems 2008;11:726–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9154-z.Search in Google Scholar

146. Moebius-Clune, BN, van Es, HM, Idowu, OJ, Schindelbeck, RR, Kimetu, JM, Ngoze, S, et al.. Long-term soil quality degradation along a cultivation chronosequence in western Kenya. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2011;141:86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.018.Search in Google Scholar

147. Schrama, M, de Haan, JJ, Kroonen, M, Verstegen, H, Van der Putten, WH. Crop yield gap and stability in organic and conventional farming systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2018;256:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.12.023.Search in Google Scholar

148. Laird, DA. The charcoal vision: a win–win–win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agron J 2008;100:178–81. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0161.Search in Google Scholar

149. Lehmann, J, Cowie, A, Masiello, CA, Kammann, C, Woolf, D, Amonette, JE, et al.. Biochar in climate change mitigation. Nat Geosci 2021;14:883–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00852-8.Search in Google Scholar

150. Stewart, CE, Zheng, J, Botte, J, Cotrufo, MF. Co‐generated fast pyrolysis biochar mitigates green‐house gas emissions and increases carbon sequestration in temperate soils. GCB Bioenergy 2013;5:153–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12001.Search in Google Scholar

151. Ahmad Bhat, S, Kuriqi, A, Dar, MUD, Bhat, O, Sammen, SS, Towfiqul Islam, ARM, et al.. Application of biochar for improving physical, chemical, and hydrological soil properties: a systematic review. Sustainability 2022;14:11104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711104.Search in Google Scholar

152. Zhang, Y, Qin, J, Yi, Y. Biochar and hydrochar derived from freshwater sludge: characterization and possible applications. Sci Total Environ 2021;763:144550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144550.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

153. Mousavi, SM, Srivastava, AK, Cheraghi, M. Soil health and crop response of biochar: an updated analysis. Arch Agron Soil Sci 2023;69:1085–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2022.2054998.Search in Google Scholar

154. Sahwan, MR, Masri, H, Verma, L, Alotaibi, A. A feasibility study for biodiesel production in kingdom of Bahrain. In: 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA); 2022. pp. 1327–33.10.1109/DASA54658.2022.9765264Search in Google Scholar

155. Maroušek, J, Strunecký, O, Stehel, V. Biochar farming: defining economically perspective applications. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2019;21:1389–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01728-7.Search in Google Scholar

156. Hussain, M, Farooq, M, Nawaz, A, Al-Sadi, AM, Solaiman, ZM, Alghamdi, SS, et al.. Biochar for crop production: potential benefits and risks. J Soils Sediments 2017;17:685–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1360-2.Search in Google Scholar

157. Kandel, A, Dahal, S, Mahatara, S. A review on biochar as a potential soil fertility enhancer to agriculture. Archives Agricult Environ Sci 2021;6:108–13. https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2021.0601014.Search in Google Scholar

158. Rani, M, Jatana, MS, Kumar, V, Devi, P. Chapter-1 Biochar: production and importance as an additive in agriculture. Chief Editor Dr. RK Naresh 2021, vol 61. p. 1.Search in Google Scholar

159. Kidmo, DK, Deli, K, Bogno, B. Status of renewable energy in Cameroon. Renew Energy Environ Sustain 2021;6:2. https://doi.org/10.1051/rees/2021001.Search in Google Scholar

160. Himri, Y, Malik, AS, Boudghene Stambouli, A, Himri, S, Draoui, B. Review and use of the Algerian renewable energy for sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009;13:1584–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

161. Koholé, YW, Fohagui, FCV, Tchuen, G. A holistic overview of Cameroon renewable energy sources: potentials, achievements, challenges and perspectives. Int J Ambient Energy 2022;43:7308–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2068065.Search in Google Scholar

162. Onah, I, Nyong, A, Ayuba, KH. A case study of improved cookstoves and clean fuel use by selected Nigerian households. World Dev 2021;142:105416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105416.Search in Google Scholar

163. Usman, M, Ibrahim, F, Oyetola, SO. Sustainable agriculture in relation to problems of soil degradation and how to amend such soils for optimum crop production in Nigeria. Int J Res Agricult Food Sci 2018;4.Search in Google Scholar

164. Akolgo, GA, Essandoh, EO, Gyamfi, S, Atta-Darkwa, T, Kumi, EN, Maia, CMB de F. The potential of a dual purpose improved cookstove for low income earners in Ghana – improved cooking methods and biochar production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.044.Search in Google Scholar

165. Bawakyillenuo, S, Crentsil, AO, Innocent, K, Danquah, S, Boakye, EB. The landscape of energy for cooking in Ghana: a review. Mod Energy Cook Serv 2021:1–56.Search in Google Scholar

166. Abdo, M, Kanyomse, E, Alirigia, R, Coffey, ER, Piedrahita, R, Diaz-Sanchez, D, et al.. Health impacts of a randomized biomass cookstove intervention in Northern Ghana. BMC Public Health 2021;21:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12164-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

167. Piedrahita, R, Dickinson, KL, Kanyomse, E, Coffey, E, Alirigia, R, Hagar, Y, et al.. Assessment of cookstove stacking in Northern Ghana using surveys and stove use monitors. Energy Sustain Dev 2016;34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.07.007.Search in Google Scholar

168. Fridahl, M, Haikola, S, Rogers, PM, Hansson, A. Biochar deployment drivers and barriers in least developed countries. In: Handbook of climate change management. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021, 1:119–48 pp.10.1007/978-3-030-57281-5_324Search in Google Scholar

169. Rosa, MF, Bonham, CA, Dempewolf, J, Arakwiye, B. An integrated approach to monitoring ecosystem services and agriculture: implications for sustainable agricultural intensification in Rwanda. Environ Monit Assess 2017;189:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5607-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

170. Christley, E, Ljungberg, H, Ackom, E, Fuso Nerini, F. Sustainable energy for slums? Using the sustainable development goals to guide energy access efforts in a Kenyan informal settlement. Energy Res Social Sci 2021;79:102176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102176.Search in Google Scholar

171. Mulugetta, Y, Agbemabiese, L. Sustainable energy systems in Africa. In: Transformational infrastructure for development of a wellbeing economy in Africa. Stellenbosch: African Sun Media; 2019:73–114 pp.10.18820/9781928480419/03Search in Google Scholar

172. Jain, S, Jain, PK. The rise of renewable energy implementation in South Africa. Energy Proc 2017;143:721–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.752.Search in Google Scholar

173. Hassan, R. Addressing sustainability and equity challenges in managing the environment and natural wealth in Sudan. The Economic Research Forum (ERF) 2022.Search in Google Scholar

174. Kyayesimira, J, Muheirwe, F. Health concerns and use of biomass energy in households: voices of women from rural communities in Western Uganda. Energy Sustain Soc 2021;11:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00316-2.Search in Google Scholar

175. Jekayinfa, SO, Orisaleye, JI, Pecenka, R. An assessment of potential resources for biomass energy in Nigeria. Resources 2020;9:1–41. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9080092.Search in Google Scholar

176. Oluwole, O, Arinola, GO, Huo, D, Olopade, CO. Household biomass fuel use, asthma symptoms severity, and asthma underdiagnosis in rural schoolchildren in Nigeria: a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Pulm Med 2017;17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-016-0352-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

177. Pona, HT, Xiaoli, D, Ayantobo, OO, Narh, DT. Environmental health situation in Nigeria: current status and future needs. Heliyon 2021;7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06330.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

178. Ugwu, CO, Ozor, PA, Ozoegwu, CG, Ndukwe, A, Mbohwa, C. Biomass resources in Nigeria and the conversion pathways. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Nsukka, Nigeria 2022. pp. 5–7. Available from: https://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2022nigeria/142.pdf.10.46254/AF03.20220142Search in Google Scholar

179. Umoh, VA, Peters, E. The relationship between lung function and indoor air pollution among rural women in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Lung India 2014;31:110–15. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.129815.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

180. Adams, CN. Biomass fuels kill 20,000 Ghanaians prematurely annually. Ghanian Times; 2022. Available from: https://www.ghanaiantimes.com.gh/biomass-fuels-kill-20000-ghanaians-prematurely-annually/.Search in Google Scholar

181. Kemausuor, F, Kamp, A, Thomsen, ST, Bensah, EC, Stergård, H. Assessment of biomass residue availability and bioenergy yields in Ghana. Resour Conserv Recycl 2014;86:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.01.007.Search in Google Scholar

182. Kipkoech, R, Takase, M, Amankwa Afrifa, EK. Renewable energies in Ghana in relation to market condition, the environment, and food security. J Renew Energy 2022:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8243904.Search in Google Scholar

183. Nazif-Muñoz, JI, Spengler, JD, Arku, RE, Oulhote, Y. Solid fuel use and early child development disparities in Ghana: analyses by gender and urbanicity. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2020;30:698–706. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0224-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

184. Takase, M, Aboah, M, Kipkoech, R. A review on renewable energy potentials and energy usage statistics in Ghana. Fuel Commun 2022;11:100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfueco.2022.100065.Search in Google Scholar

185. Yeboah, E, Dugan, E, Nartey, E, Lawson, IYD, Frimpong, KA, Obiri, BD, et al.. Biochar systems in Ghana. Agric Food Sci J Ghana 2022;15:1553–77. https://doi.org/10.4314/afsjg.v15i1.5.Search in Google Scholar

186. Bolson, N, Patzek, T. Evaluation of Rwanda’s energy resources evaluation of Rwanda’s energy resources. Sustainability 2022:1–14.10.3390/su14116440Search in Google Scholar

187. Hakizimana, E, Wali, UG, Sandoval, D, Venant, K. Environmental impacts of biomass energy sources in Rwanda. Energy Environ Eng 2020;7:62–71. https://doi.org/10.13189/eee.2020.070302.Search in Google Scholar

188. NISR. Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey 5 (EICV 5): Rwanda Poverty Profile Report 2016/17, November. In Report; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

189. Nkurunziza, M. Government to ban charcoal use in Kigali. The News-Times 2020. Available from: https://www.newtimes.co.rw/article/177010/News/government-to-ban-charcoal-use-in-kigali.Search in Google Scholar

190. Gitau, KJ, Mutune, J, Sundberg, C, Mendum, R, Njenga, M. Factors influencing the adoption of biochar-producing gasifier cookstoves by households in rural Kenya. Energy Sustain Dev 2019;52:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.07.006.Search in Google Scholar

191. Gulis, G, Mulumba, JAA, Juma, O, Kakosova, B. Health status of people of slums in Nairobi, Kenya. Environ Res 2004;96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2004.01.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

192. Omulo, G. Biochar potential in improving agricultural production in East Africa. IntechOpen 2020:1–19. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92195.Search in Google Scholar

193. Takase, M, Kipkoech, R, Essandoh, PK. A comprehensive review of energy scenario and sustainable energy in Kenya. Fuel Commun 2021;7:100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfueco.2021.100015.Search in Google Scholar

194. Department of Environmental Affairs South Africa. Assessment of the potential to produce biochar and its application to South African soils as a mitigation measure; 2015. p. 84. Available from: https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/reports/biocharreport2015.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

195. Carrier, M, Hardie, AG, Uras, Ü, Görgens, J, Knoetze, JH. Production of char from vacuum pyrolysis of South-African sugar cane bagasse and its characterization as activated carbon and biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2012;96:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.02.016.Search in Google Scholar

196. Masoga, MA. Fires, burning and flames narratives: reflections on some African indigenous perspectives. In: Biomass burning in Sub-Saharan Africa: chemical issues and action outreach. Cham: Springer Nature; 2020.10.1007/978-94-007-0808-2_10Search in Google Scholar

197. Shackleton, C, Sinasson, G, Adeyemi, O, Martins, V. Fuelwood in South Africa revisited: widespread use in a policy vacuum. Sustainability 2022;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711018.Search in Google Scholar

198. MEPD/HCENR. Sudan’s first national communications under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Issue Vol 1); 2003.Search in Google Scholar

199. Mohammed, A, Elkhalifa, E. Haematological profiles of Sudanese traditional bakery workers exposed to biomass burning hazards. Majmaah J Health Sci 2020;8:89–98. https://doi.org/10.5455/mjhs.2020.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

200. Suliman, AK, Saleh, MM, Sznajder, K, King, TS, Warren, WS. Prospective cohort study on the effect of an intervention to reduce household air pollution among Sudanese women and children. J Health Pollut 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-11.31.210905.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

201. Kansiime, WK, Mugambe, RK, Atusingwize, E, Wafula, ST, Nsereko, V, Ssekamatte, T, et al.. Use of biomass fuels predicts indoor particulate matter and carbon monoxide concentrations; evidence from an informal urban settlement in Fort Portal city, Uganda. BMC Publ Health 2022;22:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14015-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

202. MEMD. Biomass energy strategy (BEST). Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development (MEMD); 2018. pp. 1–114. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/uganda/docs/UNDPUg2014-BiomassBESTStrategy(compressed).pdf.Search in Google Scholar

203. Woolley, KE, Bagambe, T, Singh, A, Avis, WR, Kabera, T, Weldetinsae, A, et al.. Investigating the association between wood and charcoal domestic cooking, respiratory symptoms and acute respiratory infections among children aged under 5 years in Uganda: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2016 demographic and health survey. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113974.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2023-0016).


Received: 2023-05-30
Accepted: 2025-06-20
Published Online: 2025-07-31

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2023-0016/pdf
Scroll to top button