Fragment questions in Chinese: At the syntax-pragmatics interface

References

Blackburn, P. and W. Meyer-Viol. 1994. “Linguistics, logic and finite trees”. Logic Journal of the IGPL 2(1). 3–29.10.1093/jigpal/2.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Boskovic, Z. 2005. “On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP”. Studia Linguistica 59. 1–45.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2005.00118.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brunetti, L. 2003. “Information focus movement in Italian and contextual constraints on ellipsis”. Proceedings of WCCFL 22. 95–108.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, R. 2011. “Towards an account of the English auxiliary system: building interpretations incrementally”. In Kempson, R., E. Gregoromichelaki and C. Howes (eds.), The dynamics of lexical interfaces. Stanford: CSLI. 279–318.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, R., R. Kempson and L. Marten. 2005. The dynamics of language: An introduction. Oxford: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cann, R. and R. Kempson. 2017. “What do words do for us?” Dialectica 71. 425–460.10.1111/1746-8361.12180Search in Google Scholar

Chao, Y. R., 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press .Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, L. L. S. 1997. On the typology of wh-questions. London: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2005. On Phases. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frazier, L. 2009. “Explorations in ellipsis: The grammar and processing of silence”. In Winkler, S. and S. Featherston (eds.), The fruits of empirical linguistics, 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 75–101.10.1515/9783110216158.75Search in Google Scholar

Gregoromichelaki, E. 2006. Conditionals: A Dynamic Syntax account. (PhD dissertation, King’s College London.)Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, R., W. Meyer-Viol and D. M. Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic syntax: The flow of language understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, R., R. Cann, A. Eshghi, E. Gregoromichelaki and M. Purver. 2015. “Ellipsis”. In Lappin, S. and C. Fox (eds.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory 3. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 157–193.10.1002/9781118882139.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Kempson, R., R. Cann, E. Gregoromichelaki and S. Chatzikyriakidis. 2016. “Language as mechanisms for interaction”. Theoretical linguistics 42(3–4). 203–276.10.1515/tl-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, M. 2008. “Basic notions of information structure”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3–4). 243–276.10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, H. 1999. “Pseudogapping puzzles”. In Lappin, S. and E. Benmamoun (eds.), Fragments: Studies in ellipsis and gapping. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 141–174.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, C and S. Park. 1991. “‘-yo’ ssuimuy kwucowa kinung” [The structure and function of the mid-sentential ‘-yo’ construction]. Linguistic Journal of Korea 16. 361–389.Search in Google Scholar

Li, C. N. and S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520352858Search in Google Scholar

Lin, J. W. and C. C. J. Tang. 1995. “Modals as verbs in Chinese: A GB perspective”. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 66. 53–105.Search in Google Scholar

Lü, S. 1980. Xiandai hanyu babai ci [800 words in Modern Mandarin Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, J. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199243730.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, J. 2005. “Fragments and ellipsis”. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 661–738.10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, G. K. and B. C. Scholz. 2001. “On the distinction between model-theoretic and generative-enumerative syntactic frameworks”. International Conference on Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. 17–43.10.1007/3-540-48199-0_2Search in Google Scholar

Purver, M., R. Cann and R. Kempson. 2006. “Grammars as parsers: Meeting the dialogue challenge”. Research on Language and Computation 4(2–3). 289–326.10.1007/s11168-006-9007-xSearch in Google Scholar

Purver, M., A. Eshghi and J. Hough. 2011. “Incremental semantic construction in a dialogue system”. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Semantics. 365–369.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. 1981. “Definite NP anaphora and c-command domains”. Linguistic Inquiry12(4). 605–635.Search in Google Scholar

Sato, Y. 2011. “Local ambiguity, search strategies and parsing in Dynamic Syntax”. In Kempson, R., E. Gregoromichelaki and C. Howes (eds.), The Dynamics of Lexical Interfaces. Stanford: CSLI. 205–234.Search in Google Scholar

van Craenenbroeck, J. 2004. Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, T. C. 2013. “Fragment question and ellipsis in Chinese”. Studies in Chinese. Linguistics 34(3). 151–198.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, T. C. 2016. “Fragment answers in Mandarin Chinese”. International Journal of. Chinese Linguistics 3(1). 100–131.10.1075/ijchl.3.1.04weiSearch in Google Scholar

Wei, T. C. 2018. “Fragment questions in Mandarin Chinese: Topic movement and pied-piping”. Language and Linguistics 19(2). 266–305.10.1075/lali.00010.weiSearch in Google Scholar

Weir, A. 2014. Fragments and clausal ellipsis. (PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst).Search in Google Scholar

Yim, C. 2012. “Fragment answers containing -yo in Korean: New evidence for the PF deletion theory of ellipsis”. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). 514–518.10.1162/LING_a_00101Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, D. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi [Lecture notes on grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Search in Google Scholar