Is there hyper-raising in European Portuguese?

Anabela Gonçalves; Madalena Colaço

doi:10.1515/probus-2024-2005

Article

Is there hyper-raising in European Portuguese?

Anabela Gonçalves and Madalena Colaço

Published/Copyright: March 27, 2024

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information

From the journal Probus Volume 36 Issue 1

Abstract

Several languages allow for hyper-raising, a structure in which a DP that is interpreted as the subject of a finite complement clause is spelled-out as the subject of the matrix clause. Hyper-raising challenges certain core concepts of syntactic theory related to movement and locality. Various proposals have been made for analysing these structures, the main difference being whether the final position of the DP results from movement or not. It has often been assumed that European Portuguese, in contrast to Brazilian Portuguese, does not allow hyper-raising, or only allows it in very limited contexts. In this paper, we present empirical data extracted from written corpora and experimental results attesting to the production and acceptance of hyper-raising structures by a number of native speakers of European Portuguese. We contribute to identifying the contexts that favour hyper-raising in this variety and outline a preliminary analysis to explain what leads these speakers to produce and accept hyper-raising, while many others systematically reject it. In our proposal, this difference results from the properties of the embedded functional heads T and C, and the way in which their formal features are checked. Specifically, we propose that those speakers dissociate Case features from person-number features.

Keywords: hyper-raising; locality; A-movement; Case; features dissociation

Corresponding author: Anabela Gonçalves, School of Arts and Humanities, Center of Linguistics, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, E-mail: anabela.goncalves@edu.ulisboa.pt

Acknowledgments

This work was developed at Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa (Center of Linguistics, University of Lisbon), a research unit funded by FCT (UIDB/00214/2020). We would like to thank Ana Maria Martins and Fernanda Pratas for organising the Lisbon Festschrift for Mary Kato, where we presented the first version of this paper; the participants in that workshop, who gave us important suggestions; our informants; Ana Lúcia Santos, who helped us with the statistical analysis; and two anonymous reviewers, who made important comments on the first version of the paper. Needless to say, any errors are ours.

References

Ademola-Adeoye, Feyisayo. 2011. A cross-linguistic analysis of finite raising constructions. KwaZulu-Natal: University of KwaZulu-Natal dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Barbosa, Pilar, Cristina Flores & Cátia Pereira. 2018. On subject realization in infinitival complements of causative and perceptual verbs in European Portuguese: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual speakers. In Alejandro Cuza & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes (eds.), Language acquisition and contact in the Iberian peninsula, 125–158. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501509988-006Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2011. Hyperactivity and hyperagreement in Bantu. Lingua 121. 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Stephen Anderson & Kiparsky Paul (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. The Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Costa, João. 2010. PB e PE: orientação para o discurso importa? [BP and EP: Does speech orientation matter?]. Estudos da Linguagem 8. 123–143. https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v8i1.1117.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, João & Johan Rooryck. 1995. On pseudo-raising in English and Portuguese. In Léa Nash & Tsoulas George (eds.), Proceedings of Langue et Grammaire 2, 48–58. Paris: Université Paris VII.Search in Google Scholar

Creider, Chet. 1989. The syntax of the Nilotic languages. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

den Dikken, Marcel. 2017. Predication in the syntax of hyperraising and copy raising. Acta Linguistica Academica 64. 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1556/2062.2017.64.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Duarte, M. Eugênia. 1993. Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: a trajetória do sujeito no português do Brasil [From the null pronoun to the full pronoun: The trajectory of the subject in Brazilian Portuguese]. In Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds.), Português Brasileiro: uma Viagem Diacrônica, 7–128. Campinas: UNICAMP.Search in Google Scholar

Duarte, M. Eugênia. 1995. A perda do Princípio “Evite o Pronome” no Português Brasileiro [The loss of the “Avoid Pronoun” principle in Brazilian Portuguese]. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Fernández-Salgueiro, Gerardo. 2005. Agree, the EPP-F and further-raising in Spanish. In Randall Gess & Edward J. Rubin (eds.), Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics, 97–107. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.272.07ferSearch in Google Scholar

Fernández-Salgueiro, Gerardo. 2008. The Case-F valuation parameter in Romance. In Teresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntaxtic variation, 295–310. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.132.12ferSearch in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Marcelo. 2000. Argumentos nulos em português brasileiro [Null arguments in Brazilian Portuguese]. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas M.A. thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Marcelo. 2004. Hyperraising and null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Collected Papers on Romance Syntax 47. 57–85.Search in Google Scholar

Gonçalves, Anabela. 2016. The role of functional categories in Comparative Syntax: Data from European and Brazilian Portuguese. Lisbon: University of Lisbon. Unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

Greeson, Daniel. 2023. English hyperraising it seems is mediated by the θ-criterion. Paper presented at LTPA@UPenn, University of Pennsylvania, 31-March-1 April. University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar

Hornstein, Norbert, Ana Maria Martins & Jairo Nunes. 2008. Perception and causative structures in English and European Portuguese: ϕ-feature agreement and the distribution of bare and prepositional infinitives. Syntax 11. 205–229.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00105.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kato, Mary A., Ana Maria Martins & Jairo Nunes. 2023. The syntax of Portuguese. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/9780511842931Search in Google Scholar

Keine, Stefan. 2018. Case vs. positions in the locality of A-movement. Glossa 3. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.520.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Tommy T.-M. & Ka-Fei Yip. 2023. Hyperraising, evidentiality, and phase deactivation. lingbuzz/006471 (accessed 10 July 2023).10.1007/s11049-023-09604-2Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1898-6Search in Google Scholar

Martins, Ana Maria & Jairo Nunes. 2005. Raising issues in Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4. 53–77. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.159.Search in Google Scholar

Martins, Ana Maria & Jairo Nunes. 2009. Syntactic change as chain reaction: The emergence of hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese. In Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory, 144–157. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560547.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Martins, Ana Maria & Jairo Nunes. 2010. Apparent hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese: Agreement with topics across a finite CP. In Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), The complementiser phase: Subjects and operators, 142–163. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584352.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

May, Robert. 1979. Must Comp-to-Comp movement be stipulated? Linguistic Inquiry 10. 719–725.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2008. Inherent case as a licensing condition for A-movement: The case of hyper-raising constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 7. 83–108. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.129.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2015. Subespecificação de traços-ϕ e hiperalçamento em português brasileiro [φ-feature underspecification and hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese]. In Cristina Figueiredo & Edivalda Araújo (eds.), Diálogos com Ribeiro: Sobre Gramática e História da Língua Portuguesa, 121–148. Salvador: Edufba.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2016. Subject and topic hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese. In Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordoñez (eds.), The morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, 107–134. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190465889.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2017. Circumventing ϕ-minimality: On some unorthodox cases of A-movement in Brazilian Portuguese. In Ruth Lopes, Juanito Avelar & Sonia Cyrino (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 12: Selected papers from the 45th linguistic symposium on Romance languages, 159–183. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.12.11nunSearch in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2019. Remarks on finite control and hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 18. 1–50. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.196.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2020. Hiperalçamento em português brasileiro [Hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese]. Cuadernos de la ALFAL 14. 199–227.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo. 2022. Generalized phasal defectivity in Brazilian Portuguese. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics 8. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.182.Search in Google Scholar

Pires, Acrisio & Will Nediger. 2018. (Hyper-)Raising in Brazilian Portuguese and Spanish: Interaction between case and agreement. In Anabela Gonçalves & Ana Lúcia Santos (eds.), Complement clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and acquisition, 187–212. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.17.06pirSearch in Google Scholar

Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.Search in Google Scholar

Rodrigues, Cilene. 2004. Impoverished morphology and A-movement out of case domains. Maryland: University of Maryland, College Park Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rooryck, Johan & João Costa. 2000. Pseudo-raising. In Johan Rooryck (eds.), Configurations of sentential complementation: Perspectives from Romance languages, 54–72. London, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ura, Hiroyuki. 1994. Varieties of raising and the feature-based bare phrase structure theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 7. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Ussery, Cherlon. 2012. Case and phi-features as probes. Coyote Papers 20. 127–135.Search in Google Scholar

Zyman, Erik. 2023. Raising out of finite clauses (hyperraising). Annual Review of Linguistics 9. 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-022421-070658.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-03-27

Published in Print: 2024-05-27

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2024-2005

Keywords for this article

hyper-raising; locality; A-movement; Case; features dissociation