Latin verbal morphology and the diachronic development of its thematic and athematic constructions

References

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional structure in nominals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.42Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511586262Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-3889-8Search in Google Scholar

Baldi, Philip. 1994. Some thoughts on Latin rhotacism. General Linguistics 34. 209–216.Search in Google Scholar

Beekes, Robert S. P. 1995. Comparative Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.72Search in Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2018. In defense of underlying representations: Latin rhotacism, French liaison, Romanian palatalization. Probus 30(2). 171–214. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2017-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Bertocci, Davide. 2010. Presenti in nasale indo-europei: Le proprietà funzionali. Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese III(nuova serie). 23–41.Search in Google Scholar

Bertocci, Davide. 2013. Nasal presents. In Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek language and linguistics. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Bertocci, Davide. 2017. Latin 1st class -a¯ – verbs as thematic formations: On the deficiency of IE roots. Pallas 103. 45–52. https://doi.org/10.4000/pallas.4047.Search in Google Scholar

Bertocci, Davide & Francesco Pinzin. 2020. Two kinds of verbal roots in Latin: Evidence from thematic vowels and word-formation processes. Lingue antiche e moderne 9. 23–56.Search in Google Scholar

Bertocci, Davide & Francesco Pinzin. 2021. Morphology in action: Some issues in the formation of the Latin perfect. In Antonio Maráa Martín Rodríguez (ed.), Linguisticae dissertationes. Current perspectives on Latin grammar, lexicon and pragmatics. Selected papers from the 20th International Colloquium on Latin linguistics (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, June 17–21, 2019), 13–32. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Search in Google Scholar

Bjorkman, Bronwyn A. M. 2011. BE-ing default: The morphosyntax of auxiliaries. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bloch, Bernard. 1947. English verb inflection. Language 23. 399–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/410300.Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In Kleanthes K. Grohmann & Caro Struijke (eds.), Proceedings of the Maryland Mayfest on Morphology 1999. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10, 35–71.Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan. D. 2003. Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1991, 1994. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2002, 53–85. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_2Search in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives and the structure of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9069.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in romance. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 1994. The projection of arguments. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17(20). 19–48.Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, vol II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Buck, Carl Darling. 1928. A grammar of Oscan and Umbrian, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Ginn.Search in Google Scholar

Burrow, Thomas. 1955. The Sanskrit language. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Bye, Patrik & Peter Svenonius. 2012. Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence (Oxford studies in theoretical linguistics 41), 427–495. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 1994. Syncretism phenomena in the clitic systems of Italian and Sardinian dialects and the notion of morphological change. In J. Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 25, 151–173.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 1998. Some remarks on the Latin case system and its development in romance. In Jose Lema & Esthela Treviño (eds.), Theoretical advances on romance languages, 71–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.157.06calSearch in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2002. On fission and impoverishment in the verbal morphology of the dialect of Livinallongo. In Cristina Tortora (ed.), Studies on Italian dialects, 3–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195136456.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2005. Markedness and economy in a derivational model of phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197600Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2008. On absolute and contextual syncretism. Remarks on the structure of paradigms and on how to derive it. In Andrew Nevins & Asef Bachrach (eds.), The bases of inflectional identity, 156–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199219254.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2009. Markedness theory vs. phonological idiosyncrasies in a realistic model of language. In Charles Cairns & Eric Raimy (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonological theory, 261–304. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7997.003.0019Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2011. Investigations on markedeness, syncretism and zero exponence in morphology. Morphology 21(2). 283–325, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9169-y.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2015. Irregular morphology and athematic verbs in Italo-Romance. Isogloss. A Journal on Variation of Romance and Iberian Languages 2(1). 61–93. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.17.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2015. Irregular morphology and athematic verbs in Italo-Romance. Isogloss 1. 71–102.10.5565/rev/isogloss.17Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2019. Andrea Calabrese. Essays in morpho-phonology: A theory of PF. From syntax to phonology in Sanskrit and Italian verb system Ms., University of Connecticut. Available at: https://andrea-calabrese.uconn.edu/publications/.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. 2020. Remarks on the role of the perfect participle in Italian morphology and on its history. Probus 32(2). 209–269.10.1515/probus-2020-0006Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. Forthcoming.a. The morphosyntax of progressive and andative forms in Campiota vernacular: The synthetic behavior of restructuring roots. In Sabine Laszakovits & Zheng Shen (eds.), Size of things II: Movement, features and interpretation, 181–242. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea. Forthcoming.b. Sic itur ad astra/Cosi’si ascende alle stelle: On the Latin Passive morpheme /-r/ and its morphosyntactic similarity with Romance SI. In Giuliano Bocci, Daniele Botteri, Claudia Manetti & Vincenzo Moscati (eds.), Rich descriptions and simple explanation in language structure and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea & Diego Pescarini. 2014. Clitic metathesis in the Friulian dialect of Forni di Sotto. Probus 26(2). 275–308. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2014-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea & Laura Grestenberger. 2023. Accent and zero grade in Sanskrit verbal morphophonology: Evidence for cyclicity Ms., University of Connecticut and University of Vienna.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, Andrea & Roberto Petrosino. 2023. Root-adjacent exponence in the Sanskrit, Ancient Greek, and Latin verbal systems. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 8(1). 1–50.10.16995/glossa.8932Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program, volume 28 of current studies in linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Inkie. 2007. Suppletive negation in Korean and distributed morphology. Lingua 117. 95–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

Chung, Inkie. 2009. Suppletive verbal morphology in Korean and the mechanism of vocabulary insertion. Journal of Linguistics 45. 533–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226709990028.Search in Google Scholar

Christopoulos, Christos. 2018. Re-stricting the locality of contextual allomorphy Ms., University of Connecticut.Search in Google Scholar

Christopoulos, Christos & Roberto Petrosino. 2017. Greek root allomorphy without spans. In Wm G. Bennett, Lindsay Hracs & Dennis Ryan Storoshenko (eds.), Proceedings of the 35th West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics, 151–160. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Eystein & Antonio Fábregas. 2021. Zero morphemes. In Rochelle, Lieber (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Vaan, Michiel. 2012. Latin deverbal presents in -ā-. In Craig H. Melchert (ed.), The Indo-European verb, 315–332. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2000. Features, syntax and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31(2). 185–230. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554343.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultive participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3). 355–392. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389041402634.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014229.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David. 2013. Morphemes and morphophonological loci. In Alec Marantz & Ora Matushansky (eds.), Distributed morphology today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, 151–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9701.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David & Morris Halle. 2004. The Latin conjugation Ms., University of Pennsylvania and MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David & Morris Halle. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2003, 59–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.270.03embSearch in Google Scholar

Embick, David & Ralf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32. 555–595. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901753373005.Search in Google Scholar

Embick, David & Kobey Shwayder. 2018. Deriving morphophonological (mis)applications. In Roberto Petrosino, Pietro Cerrone & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), From sounds to structures: Beyond the Veil of Maya. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501506734-007Search in Google Scholar

Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas. 1951/1972. Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck Grestenberger 2021.Search in Google Scholar

Ernout, Alfred. 1953/1989. Morphologie historique du Latin, 4th edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Fabregas, Antonio. 2017. Theme Vowels are verbs. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 5. 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabio Pianesi. 1997. Tense and aspect. In From semantics to Morphosyntax. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195091922.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Grestenberger, Laura. 2016. More span-conditioned allomorphy: Voice morphology in Classical Greek. In Christopher Hammerly & Brandon Prickett (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 46, vol. 2, 1–10. Amherst: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Grestenberger, Laura. 2017. On the syntax of the participles of Indo-European deponent verbs. In Claire Le Feuvre, Daniel Petit & Georges-Jean Pinault (eds.), Verbal Adjectives and Participles in Indo-European Languages. Proceedings of the conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Paris, 24th to 26th September 2014, 105–117. Bremen: Hempen.Search in Google Scholar

Grestenberger, Laura. 2018. Deponency in finite and non-finite contexts. Language 94/3. 487–526. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0229.Search in Google Scholar

Grestenberger, Laura. 2019. Deponency in morphology. In Oxford research Encyclopedia in morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.553Search in Google Scholar

Grestenberger, Laura. 2022. To v or not to v? Theme vowels, verbalizers, and the structure of the Ancient Greek verb. Glossa 7(1). 1–41.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris. 1990. An approach to morphology. In NELS 20, 150–184. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics 30: papers at the interface, 425–449. Cambridge, Mass: MITWPL.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris. 2018. Aspects of the morphophonology of the verb in Latin and in German and English. Linguistic Inquiry 50.1. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00313.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harizanov, Boris & Vera Gribanova. 2018. Whither head movement? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37/3. 461–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-018-9420-5.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2017. The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel J. Gallego (eds.), The verbal domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198767886.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Haverling, Gerd. 2010. Actionality, tense and viewpoint. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on Latin syntax, vol. 2, 277–523. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215458.277Search in Google Scholar

Kastner, Itamar & Vera Zu. 2017. Blocking and paradigm gaps. Morphology 27. 643–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9309-8.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Explanation in phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783111666242Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. Covert generalization. In Geert Booij, Angela Ralli & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Conference of Morphology (Mytilene, Greece, Sept. 19–21 1997), 65–76. University of Patras.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. The event argument and the semantics of Voice Ms., Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, 109–138. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Kulikov, Leonid. 2012. The Vedic -ya-presents. Passives and intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan. Leiden Studies in Indo- European, Volume: 19. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789401207973_010Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 335–391.Search in Google Scholar

Lazzeroni, Romano. 2002. Transitivi, Causativi e incoativi nel Sistema verbal vedico. Incontri Linguistici XXV. 105–122.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Winfred P. 2002. Pre-Indo-European. Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph 41. 175–177.Search in Google Scholar

Leumann, Manu. 1977. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. Munich: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Levi, Clara. 1934. Studi intorno al sistema verbale osco-umbro. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 26. 43–64.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics, 253–270. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004454101_017Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In German Westphal, Benjamin Ao & Hee-Rahk Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL 8), 234–253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try a morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Alexis Dimitriadic, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams. (eds.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Philadelphia: Proceedings of the Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, vol. 4.2, 201–225.Search in Google Scholar

Macdonell, Arthur Anthony. 1916. A Vedic Grammar for students. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Search in Google Scholar

Mehler, Jacques, Marcela, Peña, Marina, Nespor & Luca, Bonatti. 2006. The “soul” of language does not use statistics: Reflections on vowels and consonants. Cortex 42(6). 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70427-1.Search in Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1964. Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indoeuropéennes. University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.Search in Google Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard. 1993. Zur Funktion des Nasalpräsens im Urindogermanischen. In Gerhard Meiser (ed.), Indogermanica et Italica. Festschrift für H. Rix, 289–313. Innsbruck: IBS.Search in Google Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard. 1998. Historische Laut- Und Formenlehre Der Lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard. 2003. Veni, vidi, vici: Die Vorgeschichte des lateinischen Perfektsystems. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Merchant, Jason. 2015. How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2). 273–303. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00182.Search in Google Scholar

Nespor, Marina, Marcela Pena & Jacques Mehler. 2003. On the different role of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio 2(2003). 203–229.Search in Google Scholar

Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure, PhD dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Impoverishment theory and morpho-syntactic markedness. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 264–285. Stanford: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Oltra-Massuet, Isabel. 1999. On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Master Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Karlos Arregi. 2005. Stress by structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1). 43–84. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993637.Search in Google Scholar

Oltra-Massuet, Isabel. 2021. Conjugation class. In Rochelle Lieber (ed.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.545Search in Google Scholar

Pisani, Vittore. 1964. Le lingue dell’Italia antica oltre il latino, 2nd edn. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Search in Google Scholar

Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1992. A misconceived approach to morphology. Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 10. 387–398.Search in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 1999. Causation and external arguments. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35. 161–183.Search in Google Scholar

Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Remberger, Eva. 2012. Participles and nominal aspect. In Sascha Gaglia & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Inflection and word formation in Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.186.10remSearch in Google Scholar

Ringe, Don. 2006. From Proto-Indo-European to Germanic. A linguistic history of English, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284139.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ringe, Don & Joseph F. Eska. 2013. Historical linguistics: Toward a twenty-first century reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511980183Search in Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut. 1986. Zur Entstehung des Urindogermanisches Modussystems. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut. 1992. Historische Grammatik des Griechischen. Laut- und Formenlehre, 2nd edn. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut. 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Rix, Helmut. 2003. Towards a reconstruction of Proto-Italic: The verbal system. In Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins Dexter (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, 1–24. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Philip J. 2012. Latin Rhotacism: A case study in the life cycle of phonological processes. Transactions of the Philological Society 110. 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968x.2012.01285.x.Search in Google Scholar

Sihler, Andrew. 1995. New comparative grammar Greek and Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195083453.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sommer, Ferdinand. 1914. Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar

Starke, Michal. 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd 36. 1–6.10.7557/12.213Search in Google Scholar

Starke, Michal. 2014. Cleaning up the lexicon. Linguistic Analysis 39. 245–256.Search in Google Scholar

Steriade, Donca. 2016. The morphome versus similarity-based syncretism: Latin t-stem derivatives. In Ana Luis & Ricardo Bermudez-Otero (eds.), The morphome debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702108.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Schwyzer, Eduard. 1939. Griechische Grammatik, vol. I. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Smyth, Herbert W. & Gordon M. Messing. 1956. Greek Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Szemerényi, Oswald. 1990. Introduction to Indo-European linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Touratier, Christian. 1975. Rhotacisme synchronique du Latin classique et rhotacisme diachronique. Glotta 53. 246–281.Search in Google Scholar

Travis, Lisa. 2010. Inner aspect: The articulation of the VP. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1007/978-90-481-8550-4Search in Google Scholar

Trommer, Jochen. 2012. Ø-exponence. In Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence, 326–355. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Villanueva Svensson, Miguel. 2021. The origin of the Indo-European simple thematic presents. Indo-European Linguistics 9(2021). 264–292. https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-bja10010.Search in Google Scholar

Watkins, Calvert. 1997. Proto-Indo-European: comparison and reconstruction. In Anna Giacolone & Paolo Ramat (eds.), The Indo- European languages, 25–73. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, Michael. 2009. Outline of the historical and comparative Grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor, MI: Beech Stave Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wetzels, Leo. 1981. Analogie et lexique: Le probleme de l’opacité en phonologie generative, PhD Dissertation. Katholieke Universiteit of Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar

Whitney, William Dwight. 1889. Sanskrit Grammar, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wurmbrand, Susi (2015). Restructuring cross-linguistically. In Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız (eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 45, 227–240. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Zwicky, Arnold & Geoffrey Pullum. 1992. A misconceived approach to morphology. In Dawn Bates (ed.), Proceedings of WCCFL 91, 387–398. Palo Alto: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar

Zyman, Erik & Nick Kalivoda. 2020. XP- and X0-movement in the Latin verb: Evidence from mirroring and anti-mirroring. Glossa 5/1(20). 1–38.10.5334/gjgl.1049Search in Google Scholar