“People confuse respeto ‘respect’ with terms of address”: an analysis of online metacommunication about politeness and second-person pronoun use in Peninsular Spanish

References

Arnaiz, Carmen. 2006. Politeness in the portrayal of workplace relationships. Second person address forms in Peninsular Spanish and the translation of Humour. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2(1). 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr.2006.007.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In Michael J. Holquist (ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin, 259–422. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blas Arroyo, Jose L. 1994a. De nuevo sobre el poder y la solidaridad. Apuntes para un análisis interaccional de la alternancia de tú-usted. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica XLII(2). 385–414. https://doi.org/10.24201/nrfh.v42i2.1852.Search in Google Scholar

Blas Arroyo, Jose L. 1994b. Tú y usted: Dos pronombres de cortesía en el Español actual. Datos de una comunidad peninsular, vol. 10, 21–44. Estudios de Lingüística Universidad Alicante. https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA1994-1995.10.02.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 253–276. New York: MIT Press.10.1515/9783110805376.252Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Calderón Campos, Miguel & Francisca Medina Morales. 2010. Historia y situación actual de los pronombres de tratamiento en el español actual. In Bettina K. Martín Hummel & Maria E. Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo Hispánico, 197–222. México D.F.: El Colegio de México.Search in Google Scholar

Carbaugh, Donal. 1990. Communication rules in Donahue discourse. In Donal Carbaugh (ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact, 119–149. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of politeness theory. Brooklands, Manchester: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, Kristine L. 2003. Cultural persuadables. Communication Theory 13(1). 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00284.x.Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611834Search in Google Scholar

Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Bradford J. 1988. Norms, action, and alignment: A discursive perspective. Research on Language & Social Interaction 22(1–4). 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818809389296.Search in Google Scholar

Hickey, Leo & Ignacio Vázquez Orta. 1990. El empleo de” tú” y” usted” en el discurso publipropagandístico. Revista Espanola de Linguistica Aplicada 6. 73–81.Search in Google Scholar

Hine, Christine. 2015. Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1972. Models of the interaction of language and social life. In John Gumperz & Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 35–71. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4_39Search in Google Scholar

Lara Bermejo, Victor. 2010. El uso de ustedes por vosotros en Andalucía Occidental. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910Search in Google Scholar

Medina Morales, Francisca. 2010. La metodología en los estudios sobre formas y formulas de tratamiento en español. In Bettina K. Martín Hummel & Maria E. Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo Hispánico, 23–55. Mexico D.F.: El Colegio de México.Search in Google Scholar

Milburn, Trudy. 2015. Speech community. In Karen Tracy, Cornelia Ilie & Todd Sandel (eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1–5. Boston: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi040Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara. 2015. Language, culture, and politeness. In Farzad Sharifan (ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture, 129–140. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315793993-17Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara & Dániel Kádár. 2011. Politeness and culture. In Dániel Kádár & Sara Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia, 21–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511977886.004Search in Google Scholar

Molina, Isabel. 2010. Inmigración Latinoamericana en Madrid: Actitudes lingüísticas y convergencia pronominal. In Bettina K. Martín Hummel & Maria E. Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo Hispánico, 859–885. México D.F.: El Colegio de México.Search in Google Scholar

Moyna, María I., Bettina Kluge & J. Simon Horst. 2019. Address and address research: Here’s looking at you, kid. In Bettina Kluge & María I. Moyna (eds.), It’s not all about ‘you’: New perspectives on address research, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tar.1.intSearch in Google Scholar

Muehlmann, Shaylih. 2014. The speech community and beyond. In Jack Sidnell, N. J. Enfield & Paul Kockelman (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 577–598. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139342872.027Search in Google Scholar

Paredes, Florentino. 2010. ¿Es factible un cuestionario estándar para el estudio del tratamiento? La experiencia del proyecto Preseea en Madrid y Alcalá de Henares. In Bettina K. Martín Hummel & Maria E. Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo Hispánico, 165–191. México D.F: El Colegio de México.Search in Google Scholar

Parkinson, Diworth B. 1985. Constructing the social context of communication: Terms of address in Egyptian Arabic. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110857351Search in Google Scholar

Philipsen, Gerry. 1975. Speaking “like a man” in Teamsterville: Culture patterns of role enactment in an urban neighborhood. Quarterly Journal of Speech 61(1). 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637509383264.Search in Google Scholar

Philipsen, Gerry. 1992. Speaking culturally: Explorations in social communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Philipsen, Gerry. 1997. A theory of speech codes. In Gerry Philipsen & Terrence Albrecht (eds.), Developing communication theory, 119–156. Albany, NY: SUNY.Search in Google Scholar

Philipsen, Gerry, Lisa Coutu & Patricia Covarrubias. 2005. Speech codes theory: Restatement, revisions, and responses to criticisms. In William B. Gudykunst (ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 55–68. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Sanders, E. Robert. 2005. Introduction: LSI as a subject matter and as multidisciplinary confederation. In Kristine Fitch & E. Robert Sanders (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction, vols. 1–14. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Sanroman Vilas, Begoña. 2010. El uso de tú y usted en los jóvenes de Cádiz. In Bettina K. Martín Hummel & Maria E.Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico, 735–754. México D.F: El Colegio de México.Search in Google Scholar

Serrano, María José. 2019. The variable functions of addressing hearer-participants with Spanish second person object forms in media discourse. In Bettina Kluge & María I. Moyna (eds.), It’s not all about ‘you’: New perspectives on address research, 281–303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tar.1.11serSearch in Google Scholar

Sinner, Carsten. 2010. ¿Cómo te hablé, de vos o de tú? Uso y acomodación de las formas de tratamiento por emigrantes y turistas Argentinos en España y Alemania. In Bettina K. Martín Hummel & Maria E. Vázquez Laslop (eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo Hispánico, 831–855. México D.F: El Colegio de México.Search in Google Scholar

Spradely, James P. 1980. Participant observation. New York, Holt: Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

van der Bom, Isabelle & Sara Mills. 2015. A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 11(2). 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615184Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter Robert Rupert. 2003. Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23. 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.011.Search in Google Scholar