Home Design and application of soft robot grippers using low-viscosity silicone by lost core injection molding manufacturing method
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Design and application of soft robot grippers using low-viscosity silicone by lost core injection molding manufacturing method

  • Helmy Dewanto Bryantono ORCID logo , Meng-Hsun Tsai ORCID logo and Shi-Chang Tseng EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 3, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This project aims to develop a manufacturing method for a newly designed soft robot gripper in one shot by utilizing a low-viscosity liquid silicone rubber (LSR) lost-core injection molding embedded with a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) water-soluble core inside. Due to the relatively high viscosity of LSR, higher injection pressures were needed to complete the mold-filling process. This, in turn, resulted in a washout of the PVA lost core. Therefore, this study used a lower viscosity of LSR and pressure to avoid this problem. Ansys structural analysis simulation was used to get the experiment variables and then compare them with the real experiment results. The maximum pressure employed in the simulation of the gripper bending is 30 kPa with 119.38 mm, while the experimental is 112.65 mm total deformation. Finally, the washout of the lost core, the bending restriction problem, and the complicated manufacturing problems in this area were tackled in this study. The design of a finger with a greater angle at the edge and the use of low-viscosity LSR as the primary material in a one-shot lost core LSR injection molding method are extensions from previous studies that are believed to be valuable inventions for academic and practical applications.


Corresponding author: Shi-Chang Tseng, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliu, 64002, Taiwan, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: MOST-107-2221-E-224-045

  1. Research ethics: The research work is original by the authors.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: Helmy Dewanto Bryantono: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, writing – original draft, visualization. Meng-Hsun Tsai: data curation, investigation, resources, software, writing – review & editing. Shi-Chang Tseng: validation, supervision, funding acquisition.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

  6. Research funding: This work has been developed within the project by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan, funded from grant MOST-107-2221-E-224-045.

  7. Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1. Venkatesh Raja, K.; Malayalamurthi, R. Assessment and Influence of Internal Rigid Core on the Contact Parameters for Soft Hemispherical Fingertips. J. Polym. Eng. 2014, 34 (2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2013-0121.Search in Google Scholar

2. Wang, Z.; Or, K.; Hirai, S. A Dual-Mode Soft Gripper for Food Packaging. Rob. Auton. Syst. 2020, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2020.103427.Search in Google Scholar

3. Hao, Y.; Wang, T.; Ren, Z.; Gong, Z.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Guan, S.; Wen, L. Modeling and Experiments of a Soft Robotic Gripper in Amphibious Environments. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2017, 14 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881417707148.Search in Google Scholar

4. Duran, M. M.; Moro, G.; Zhang, Y.; Islam, A. 3D Printing of Silicone and Polyurethane Elastomers for Medical Device Application: A Review. Adv. Ind. Manuf. Eng. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2023.100125.Search in Google Scholar

5. Osswald, T. A.; Menges, G. Materials Science of Polymers for Engineers; Carl Hanser Verlag Gmbh Co KG: Munchen, 2012.10.3139/9781569905241Search in Google Scholar

6. Liparoti, S.; Speranza, V.; De Meo, A.; De Santis, F.; Pantani, R. Prediction of the Maximum Flow Length of a Thin Injection Molded Part. J. Polym. Eng. 2020, 40 (9), 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0292.Search in Google Scholar

7. Tsou, H. H.; Huang, C. C.; Chen, Y. C.; Shih, S. Y. Online Detection of Residual Stress Near the Gate Using Cavity Pressure for Injection Molding. J. Polym. Eng. 2023, 43 (1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/polyeng-2022-0113.Search in Google Scholar

8. Giacomin, A. J.; Hade, A. J.; Johnson, L. M.; Mix, A. W.; Chen, Y. C.; Liao, H. C.; Tseng, S. C. Core Deflection in Injection Molding. J. Nonnewton Fluid Mech. 2011, 166 (16), 908–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2011.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

9. Chen, Y. C.; Liao, Y. J.; Tseng, S. C.; Giacomin, A. J. Core Deflection in Plastics Injection Molding: Direct Measurement, Flow Visualization and 3d Simulation. Polym. – Plast. Technol. Eng. 2011, 50 (9), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2010.551386.Search in Google Scholar

10. Dewanto Bryantono, H.; Tseng, S.-C. Design and Manufacture of Robot Gripper Using Injection Molding. Master Thesis, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ca294u (accessed 2024-01-31).Search in Google Scholar

11. White, F. M. In Fluid Mechanics, 7th ed.; Stenquist, B., Ed.; McGraw-Hil: New York, vol. 7, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

12. Wang, M.-L.; Chang, R.-Y.; Hsu, C.-H. D. Molding Simulation: Theory and Practice; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2018.10.3139/9781569906200.fmSearch in Google Scholar

13. Cook, R. D.; Malkus, D. S.; Plesha, M. E.; Witt, R. J. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 4th ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc: Madison, US, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

14. Harkous, A.; Colomines, G.; Leroy, E.; Mousseau, P.; Deterre, R. The Kinetic Behavior of Liquid Silicone Rubber: A Comparison between Thermal and Rheological Approaches Based on Gel Point Determination. React. Funct. Polym. 2016, 101, 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.01.020.Search in Google Scholar

15. Kamal, M. R.; Sourour, S. Kinetics and Thermal Characterization of Thermoset Cure. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1973, 13, 59–64; https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760130110.Search in Google Scholar

16. Bont, M.; Barry, C.; Johnston, S. A Review of Liquid Silicone Rubber Injection Molding: Process Variables and Process Modeling. Polym. Eng. Sci. John Wiley and Sons Inc February, 2021, 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.25618.Search in Google Scholar

17. Asia Silicone Chemical Materials Co., Ltd. Liq. Silicon. Rubber CN-251 Mater. Prop., https://toungchi.com.tw/application.php (accessed 2024-03-18).Search in Google Scholar

18. Hassan, C. M.; Trakampan, P.; Peppas, N. A. Water Solubility Characteristics of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) and Gels Prepared by Freezing/Thawing Processes. Water Soluble Polym.: Solut. Prop. Appl. 2002, 31–40.10.1007/0-306-46915-4_3Search in Google Scholar

19. RS Components Ltd RS PRO – PVA Technical Document. Birchington Road, Corby, Northants, NN17 9RS, UK, 2020. https://docs.rs-online.com/55d3/A700000006781717.pdf (accessed 2024-03-18).Search in Google Scholar

20. IRB 1200 ABB Robotics – Articulated Robots Portfolio | ABB Robotics (Browse All ABB Robots). https://new.abb.com/products/robotics/robots/articulated-robots/irb-1200 (accessed 2023-08-05).Search in Google Scholar

21. Jagota, V.; Sethi, A. P. S.; Kumar, K. Finite Element Method: An Overview. Walailak J. Sci. Technol.(WJST). 2013, 10 (1), 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

22. Lin, C. C.; Yang, C. L. A Water-Soluble Core for Manufacturing Hollow Injection-Molded Products. Polym. (Basel) 2022, 14 (11). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112185.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Kuraray Co., Ltd.. MOWIFLEX TM Maximizing Freedom of Design in Manufacturing Plastic Parts; Kuraray Co., Ltd.: Tokyo, Japan, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

24. Bryantono, H. D.; Saduk, M. R. F.; Hong, J.; Tsai, M.-H.; Tseng, S.-C. Design and Manufacturing of Soft Grippers for Robotics by Injection Molding Technology. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2023, 8 (4), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj080402.Search in Google Scholar

25. Saduk, M. R. F.; Bryantono, H. D.; Tseng, S. C. Engineering Design of Soft Gripper and Manufacturing by TPE Hollow Injection Molding. In Proceedings – 2022 IET International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applications, IET-ICETA. 2022; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022.10.1109/IET-ICETA56553.2022.9971524Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-10-27
Accepted: 2025-01-01
Published Online: 2025-02-03
Published in Print: 2025-03-26

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2024-0223/html
Scroll to top button