Home Predictive maintenance feasibility assessment based on nonreturn valve wear of injection molding machines
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Predictive maintenance feasibility assessment based on nonreturn valve wear of injection molding machines

  • Hao-Hsuan Tsou ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Jie-An Lin and Chung-Ching Huang
Published/Copyright: November 27, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Predictive maintenance techniques are increasingly important in Industry 4.0; they can be applied to nonreturn valves to mitigate waste from improper replacement. To improve such predictive maintenance, this study used four nonreturn valves with different outer diameters to investigate the effects of wear on process variables and product quality under different process parameters. The results indicated that melt temperature (process parameter) had the most substantial influence on the amount of melt backflow. The process variables are the screw position at the end of the packing stage, the slope of the screw position during the packing stage, and peak pressure. The study investigated the influence of nonreturn valve wear on the entire molding process over different periods. The findings can be extended to prediction models for developing process windows and realizing the predictive maintenance of nonreturn valves in injection molding machines.


Corresponding author: Hao-Hsuan Tsou, Department of Mold and Die Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, 415 Chien-Kung Road, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan, Republic of China, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 111-2221-E-992-007-MY2

  1. Research ethics: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: The financial support provided by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan under project no. 111-2221-E-992-007-MY2 is gratefully acknowledged.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Grelle, P. F. Injection molding. In Handbook of Plastic Processes; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, 2006; pp. 1–123.10.1002/0471786586.ch1Search in Google Scholar

2. Schiller, G. F. Injection unit: screw. In A Practical Approach to Scientific Molding; Carl Hanser Verlag: Munich, 2018; pp. 1–12.10.3139/9781569906873.001Search in Google Scholar

3. Zhao, C.-L., Schiffers, R. Condition monitoring of non-return valves in injection molding machines using available process and machine data. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2205, 1–5; https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5142969.Search in Google Scholar

4. Blutmager, A., Varga, M., Cihak-Bayr, U., Friesenbichler, W., Mayrhofer, P. H. Wear in hard metal check valves: in-situ surface modification through tribolayer formation in dry contact. Vacuum 2021, 192, 110482.10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110482Search in Google Scholar

5. Dawkins, E. Practical Guideline for Establishing Non-return Valve Specification and Performance Criteria. Master’s Thesis, Western Michigan University, MI, USA, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

6. Hatanaka, S., Kitagawa, H. Behavior of back-flow valve during injection process and its effect on variations in injection moldings mass. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. C 1993, 59, 3529–3536; https://doi.org/10.1299/kikaib.59.3529.Search in Google Scholar

7. Jeffrey, M. D. R., Nicolia, D. An injection molding process capability comparison between position and hydraulic transfer modes across various degrees of check ring wear. PE/ANTEC 2000 Proceedings 2000; pp. 3559–3563.Search in Google Scholar

8. Yokoi, H. Visualization technique for injection molding. J Jpn. Soc. Electr. Mach. Eng. 2000, 34, 6–13; https://doi.org/10.2526/jseme.34.6.Search in Google Scholar

9. Schiller, G. F. Machine performance testing. In A Practical Approach to Scientific Molding, 2018; pp. 43–52.10.3139/9781569906873.005Search in Google Scholar

10. Park, C., Moon, D., Do, N., Bae, S. M. A predictive maintenance approach based on real-time internal parameter monitoring. Int. J. Adv. Des. Manuf. Technol. 2016, 85, 623–632; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7981-6.Search in Google Scholar

11. Fruth, S., Kruppa, S., Schiffers, R. Condition monitoring for injection molding screws. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2289, 020023.10.1063/5.0028341Search in Google Scholar

12. Praher, B., Steinbichler, G. Zustandsüberwachung des tribomechanischen Systems Massezylinder/Plastifizierschnecke in der Kunststoffverarbeitung. In 18. GMA/ITG-Fachtagung Sensoren und Messsysteme; VDI/VDE-Gesellschaft Mess- und Automatisierungstechnik (GMA): Nuremberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 376–382.10.5162/sensoren2016/5.3.3Search in Google Scholar

13. Takatsugi, S., Uchiyama, T., Maruyama, J., Ishikuro, T., Fujioka, O., Ohmori, A. Development of operation detection system of check ring in injection molding machine. J. Jpn. Soc. Pre. Eng. 2017, 83, 281–286; https://doi.org/10.2493/jjspe.83.281.Search in Google Scholar

14. Uchiyama, T. Y. Abrasion Amount Estimation Device and Abrasion Amount Estimation Method for Check Valve of Injection Molding Machine. United States Patent, no.10562217B2, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-08-28
Accepted: 2023-11-10
Published Online: 2023-11-27
Published in Print: 2024-01-29

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2023-0201/html
Scroll to top button