Abstract
The aim of this work is to determine which of the techniques that allow to measure the strain induced in polymer composites by the chemical shrinkage of resin is most appropriate for predicting process-induced deformations. There are two approaches to determine the chemical strain: measurements in-plane and through-the-thickness of composite. In the following study, two methods were used for the measurement of unidirectional carbon/epoxy composite: novel one that employs a dynamic mechanical analyzer to measure through-the-thickness strain and one designed previously to measure in-plane strain. As the results of the methods were different, finite element simulation of process-induced deformation of C-sectioned composite element was carried out in order to verify the results. Comparison of numerical results with the real part deformation showed that the measurement of through-the-thickness chemical strain is the more accurate approach in the case of the prediction of deformation and that the novel method gives valid results.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the project “Development of the Technology for Testing the Resistance to Damage of Aviation and Space Composite Load Bearing Structures” – TEBUK, No. POIG.01.01.02-14-017. The project is financially supported by the European Regional Development Fund within the framework of Innovative Economy – National Cohesion Strategy. The support from Prof. Piotr Czarnocki and Mr. Zbigniew Lorenc is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Daniel M, Wang T-M, Karalekas D, Gotro JT. J. Comp. Techn. Res. 1990, 12, 172–176.10.1520/CTR10194JSuche in Google Scholar
[2] Nawab Y, Shahid S, Boyard N, Jacquemin F. J. Mat. Sci. 2013, 48, 5387–5409.10.1007/s10853-013-7333-6Suche in Google Scholar
[3] Garstka T, Ersoy N, Potter KD and Wisnom MR. Comp. Part A 2007, 38, 2517–2526.10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.07.018Suche in Google Scholar
[4] Radford DW, Rennick TS. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 2000, 19, 621–641.10.1177/073168440001900802Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Zarrelli M, Partridge IK, D’Amore A. Comp. Part A. 2006, 37, 565–570.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.012Suche in Google Scholar
[6] Madhukar MS, Genidy MS, Russell JD. J. Comp. Mat. 2000, 34, 1882–1904.10.1106/HUCY-DY2B-2N42-UJBXSuche in Google Scholar
[7] Nawab Y, Tardif X, Boyard N, Sobotka V, Casari P, Jacquemin F. Comp. Sci. Techn. 2012, 73, 81–87.10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.018Suche in Google Scholar
[8] Albert C, Fernlund G. Comp. Sci. Techn. 2002, 62, 1895–1912.10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00105-7Suche in Google Scholar
[9] Ruiz E, Billotte C, Bernard FM, Carra F, Baurier H. In: 18th International Conference on Composite Materials, Edinburgh, Scotland, 27–31 July 2009.Suche in Google Scholar
[10] Wisnom MR, Potter KD. In: Composites forming technologies, Long, AC, Ed., Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, 2007, p.177–196.10.1533/9781845692537.177Suche in Google Scholar
[11] Dong C. Comp. Struct. 2010, 92, 1614–1619.10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.026Suche in Google Scholar
[12] Khoun L, Hubert P. Polym. Comp. 2010, 31, 1603–1610.10.1002/pc.20949Suche in Google Scholar
[13] ASTM E228-11. Standard test method for linear expansion of solid materials with a push-rod dilatometer. ASTM International, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar
[14] Yu H, Mhaisalkar SG, Wong EH. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 1483–1487.10.1002/marc.200500333Suche in Google Scholar
[15] Li C, Potter K, Wisnom MR, Stringer G. Comp. Sci. Techn. 2004, 64, 55–64.10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00199-4Suche in Google Scholar
[16] Shah DU, Schubel PJ. Polym. Testing. 2010, 29, 629–639.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.05.001Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Hoa SV, Ouellette P, Ngo TD. J. Comp. Mat. 2009, 43, 783–803.10.1177/0021998308102035Suche in Google Scholar
[18] Flores F, Gillespie JW, Bogetti TA. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2002, 42, 582–590.10.1002/pen.10973Suche in Google Scholar
[19] Kay J, Fahrang L, Hsiao K, Fernlund G. In: 18th International Conference on Composite Materials, Edinburgh, Scotland, 27–31 July 2009.Suche in Google Scholar
[20] Liu L, Zhang B-M, Wang D-F, Wu Z-J. J. Mat. Sci. Techn. 2005, 21, 87–91.Suche in Google Scholar
[21] Liu L, Zhang B-M, Wang D-F, Wu Z-J. Comp. Struct. 2006, 73, 303–309.10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.02.001Suche in Google Scholar
[22] Russell J. SAMPE Quarterly 1993, 24, 28–33.10.1007/978-1-4899-6016-0_8Suche in Google Scholar
[23] Mulle M, Collombet F, Olivier P, Grunevald Y-H. Comp. Part A 2009, 40, 94–104.10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.008Suche in Google Scholar
[24] Mulle M, Collombet F, Olivier P, Zitoune R, Huchette C, Laurin F, Grunevald Y-H. Comp. Part A 2009, 40, 1534–1544.10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.06.013Suche in Google Scholar
[25] Ersoy N, Tugutlu M. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2010, 50, 84–92.10.1002/pen.21514Suche in Google Scholar
[26] Olivier PA. Comp. Part A 2006, 37, 602–617.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.006Suche in Google Scholar
[27] Crasto S, Kim RY, Russell JD. Polym. Comp. 2002, 23, 454–463.10.1002/pc.10447Suche in Google Scholar
[28] Benedikt B, Lewis M, Rangaswamy P, Kumosa M, Predecki P, Kumosa L, Gentz M. Mat. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 421, 1–8.10.1016/j.msea.2005.10.006Suche in Google Scholar
[29] Benedikt B, Kumosa M, Predecki PK. Acta Mat. 2005, 53, 4531–4543.10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.008Suche in Google Scholar
[30] Ersoy N, Garstka T, Potter K, Wisnom MR, Porter D, Stringer G. Comp. Part A 2010, 41, 410–418.10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.008Suche in Google Scholar
[31] Bilyeu B, Brostow W, Menard KP. Polym. Comp. 2002, 23, 1111–1119.10.1002/pc.10505Suche in Google Scholar
[32] Cadenato A, Salla JM, Ramis X, Morancho JM, Marroyo LM, Martin JL. J. Therm. Analysis 1997, 49, 269–279.10.1007/BF01987448Suche in Google Scholar
[33] Osmęda A, Lorenc Z. Mechanik 2013, 8–9, 746–752.Suche in Google Scholar
[34] Kim YK, White SR. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1996, 36, 2852–2862.10.1002/pen.10686Suche in Google Scholar
[35] Jones RM. Mechanics of Composite Materials. Taylor & Francis: New York, 1999.Suche in Google Scholar
[36] Potter KD, Campbell M, Langer C, Wisnom MR. Comp. Part A. 2005, 36, 301–308.10.1016/S1359-835X(04)00150-2Suche in Google Scholar
[37] Jain LK, Hou M, Ye L, Mai Y-W. Comp. Part A 1998, 29A, 973–979.10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00085-7Suche in Google Scholar
[38] Radford DW, Diefendorf RJ. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 1993, 12, 58–75.10.1177/073168449301200104Suche in Google Scholar
[39] Kappel E, Stefaniak D, Huhne C. In: 28th International Conference of the Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane, Australia, 23–28 September 2012.Suche in Google Scholar
[40] Bapanapalli SK, Smith LV. Comp. Part A. 2005, 36, 1666–1674.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.018Suche in Google Scholar
[41] White SR, Hahn HT. J. Comp. Mat. 1993, 27, 1352–1378.10.1177/002199839302701402Suche in Google Scholar
[42] Svanberg JM, Holmberg JA. Comp. Part A. 2001, 32, 827–838.10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00173-1Suche in Google Scholar
[43] Wisnom MR, Gigliotti M, Ersoy N, Campbell M, Potter KD. Comp. Part A. 2006, 37, 522–529.10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.019Suche in Google Scholar
[44] Gigliotti M, Wisnom MR, Potter KD. Comp. Sci. Techn. 2003, 63, 187–197.10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00195-1Suche in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Review
- Advances in preparation, modification, and application of polypropylene membrane
- Original articles
- Preparation of alginate membrane for tissue engineering
- Plasticizing effects of citrate esters on properties of poly(lactic acid)
- N,N′-Bis(benzoyl) adipic acid dihydrazide and talc: nucleating agents for poly(l-lactic acid)
- Comparison study of carbon black (CB) used as conductive filler in epoxy and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)
- The effect of large area graphene oxide (LAGO) nanosheets on the mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol
- Effect of viscosity reducing agent on the properties of CNT/epoxy nanocomposites
- Analysis of heat generation characteristics in ultrasonic welding of plastics under low amplitude conditions
- Effect of manufacturing parameters and thermal treatment on the properties of tubular braids and tubular knits
- Measurements of strain induced by chemical shrinkage in polymer composites
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Review
- Advances in preparation, modification, and application of polypropylene membrane
- Original articles
- Preparation of alginate membrane for tissue engineering
- Plasticizing effects of citrate esters on properties of poly(lactic acid)
- N,N′-Bis(benzoyl) adipic acid dihydrazide and talc: nucleating agents for poly(l-lactic acid)
- Comparison study of carbon black (CB) used as conductive filler in epoxy and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)
- The effect of large area graphene oxide (LAGO) nanosheets on the mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol
- Effect of viscosity reducing agent on the properties of CNT/epoxy nanocomposites
- Analysis of heat generation characteristics in ultrasonic welding of plastics under low amplitude conditions
- Effect of manufacturing parameters and thermal treatment on the properties of tubular braids and tubular knits
- Measurements of strain induced by chemical shrinkage in polymer composites