Preparation and characterization of poly(MMA-EGDMA-AMPS) microspheres by soap-free emulsion polymerization
-
Jingshui Xu
, Denglong Chen , Xianglong Hu , Yangchuan Ke, Qian Zhou
, Wensuai Gao , Zheling Zeng and Guoliang Zhang
Abstract
The poly(methyl methacrylate-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate-2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid) [poly(MMA-EGDMA-AMPS)] microsphere was produced by a soap-free emulsion polymerization of MMA, EGDMA and AMPS. The chemical composition, morphology, particle size distribution and properties of the obtained microspheres were characterized by energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), a laser particle analyzer and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Results showed that the microspheres had a high-quality spherical morphology, irrespective of the components, and their particle sizes mainly ranged from 10 μm to 70 μm. The microspheres were thermally stable up to 190°C. As the AMPS loading was increased, the synthetic yield rate decreased and the water uptake increased. The optimum synthetic yield rate and water uptake were obtained at a 2.0 wt% AMPS. In addition, the selected microspheres with a diameter of approximately 25 μm provided an effective plugging, and the plugging rate was up to 80%. This study demonstrated that the plugging behavior of microspheres was due to their deformation, migration and aggregating properties in the plugging process, which made them potential materials for modifying the porous reservoir to enhance oil recovery in petroleum engineering.
Acknowledgments
Financial support of the forward-looking guidance project of China University of Petroleum (Beijing) (QZDX-2010-04), National major project (2011ZX05009-005), Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21076229) and the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant, No. 51221003) and Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (No. KYJJ2012-06-30) is greatly appreciated.
References
[1] McDonald CJ, Bouck KJ, Chaput AB, Stevens CJ. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 1593–1605.10.1021/ma991284eSearch in Google Scholar
[2] Guan HN, Chi DF, Yu J, Li H. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 168, 94–101.10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.040Search in Google Scholar
[3] Rouilly A, Rigal L, Gilbert RG. Polymer 2004, 45, 7813–7820.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.09.043Search in Google Scholar
[4] Khezri K, Haddadi-Asl V, Roghani-Mamaqani H, Salami-Kalajahi M. Polym. Compos. 2012, 33, 990–998.10.1002/pc.22233Search in Google Scholar
[5] Caruso F. Chem. A Eur. J. 2000, 6, 413–419.10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(20000204)6:3<413::AID-CHEM413>3.0.CO;2-9Search in Google Scholar
[6] Sirota EB, Ou-Yang HD, Sinha SK, Chaikin PM. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62, 1524–1527.10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1524Search in Google Scholar
[7] Lee J, Hong CK, Choe S, Shim SE. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 310, 112–120.10.1016/j.jcis.2006.11.008Search in Google Scholar
[8] Kammona O, Chatzi EG, Kiparissides C. J. Macromol. Sci. Part C: Polym. Rev. 1999, 39, 57–134.10.1081/MC-100101417Search in Google Scholar
[9] Ke YC, Wu TB, Xia YF. Polymer 2007, 48, 3324–3336.10.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.059Search in Google Scholar
[10] Islam MS, Yeum JH, Das AK. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2012, 368, 400–405.10.1016/j.jcis.2011.11.002Search in Google Scholar
[11] Feiz S, Navarchian AH. J. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 69, 431–439.10.1016/j.ces.2011.10.063Search in Google Scholar
[12] Xu JS, Ke YC, Zhou Q, Hu XL. Compos. Interfaces 2013, 20, 165–176.10.1080/15685543.2012.762732Search in Google Scholar
[13] Covolan VL, D’Antone S, Ruggeri G, Chiellini E. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 6685–6692.10.1021/ma0000430Search in Google Scholar
[14] Lee KC, Wi HA. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 253–159.10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61080-7Search in Google Scholar
[15] Shibuya K, Nagao D, Ishii H, Konno M. Polymer 2014, 55, 535–539.10.1016/j.polymer.2013.12.039Search in Google Scholar
[16] Dowding PJ, Vincent B. Colloid. Surf. A. 2000, 161, 259–269.10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00375-1Search in Google Scholar
[17] Sánchez-Silva L, Rodríguez JF, Romero A, Borreguero AM, Carmona M, Sánchez P. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 157, 216–222.10.1016/j.cej.2009.12.013Search in Google Scholar
[18] Meneqhetti P, Qutubuddin S. Langmuir 2004, 20, 3424–3430.10.1021/la0357099Search in Google Scholar
[19] Yadav M, Rhee KY. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 90, 165–173.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.010Search in Google Scholar
[20] Ozmen MM, Okay O. Polymer 2005, 46, 8119–8127.10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.102Search in Google Scholar
[21] Lei G, Li L, Nasr-El-Din H. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 2011, 14, 120–128.10.2118/129960-PASearch in Google Scholar
[22] Hu Z, Ba Z, Xiong W, Gao S, Lu R. J. Daqing Pet. Institute. 2006, 3, 51–55.Search in Google Scholar
[23] Xiong CM, Tang XF. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2007, 34, 83–88.10.1504/IJCAT.2007.012329Search in Google Scholar
[24] Koch RR, McLaughlin HC. Presented at SPE Particle Aspects of Improved Recovery Technique Symposium, Fort Worth, TX, 1970, SPE Paper 2847.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Chen KS. Offshore South East Asia Show, Singapore, 1988, SPE Paper 17674.Search in Google Scholar
[26] Nanda SK, Kumar R, Sindhwani KL, Goyal KL. Presented at SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, San Antonio, TX, 1987, SPE Paper 16253.Search in Google Scholar
[27] Li MY, Wu ZL. Chem. Oilfield 2000, 33, 343–345.10.1016/S1474-6670(17)39654-4Search in Google Scholar
[28] Chang HL, Sui XG, Xiao L, Guo ZD, Yao YM, Xiao YG, Chen G, Song KP, James CM. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 2006, 9, 664–673.10.2118/89460-PASearch in Google Scholar
[29] Chauveteau G, Tabary R, Blin N, Renard M, Rousseau D, Faber R. Presented at SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulas, OK, 2004, SPE Paper 89390.Search in Google Scholar
[30] Dalrymple D, Eoff L, Vasquez J, Eijden JV. Presented at SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, Russia, 2008, SPE Paper 114886.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Zhang H, Bai BJ. SPE. J. 2011,16, 388–400.10.2118/129908-PASearch in Google Scholar
[32] Jia XF, Lei GL Jia XY. Spec. Oil Gas Reservoirs 2009, 16, 6–12.Search in Google Scholar
[33] Flechter AJ. J. Polym. Sci. Eng. 1992, 7, 33–43.Search in Google Scholar
[34] Zhao HZ, Wu ZL, Zheng XY, Lin MQ, Li MY. Fine Chem. 2005, 22, 62–64.Search in Google Scholar
[35] Yao C, Lei G, Li L, Gao X. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 5092–5101.10.1021/ef300689cSearch in Google Scholar
[36] Polacco G, Palla M, Semino D. Polym. Int. 1999, 483, 92–397.Search in Google Scholar
[37] Bao Y, Ma J, Sun Y. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 589–595.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.003Search in Google Scholar
[38] Yang SL, Wei JZ. Oil and Gas Layers in Physics, Petro Industry Press: Beijing, 2011 (In Chinese).Search in Google Scholar
[39] Tuncel A. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 2000, 278, 1126–1138.10.1007/s003960000317Search in Google Scholar
[40] Mallakpour S, Madani M. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 4071–4078.10.1007/s10853-011-5336-8Search in Google Scholar
[41] Georgiadou S, Brooks BW. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 7137–7152.10.1016/j.ces.2005.07.003Search in Google Scholar
[42] Jiang J, Zhang Y, Guo X, Zhang H. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 5893–5904.10.1021/ma201038eSearch in Google Scholar
[43] Lin W, Biegler LT, Jacobson AM. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65, 4350–4362.10.1016/j.ces.2010.03.052Search in Google Scholar
[44] Uğuzdoğan E, Denkbas EB, Özürk E, Tuncel SA, Kabasakal OS. J. Hzaard. Mater. 2009, 162, 1073–1080.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.145Search in Google Scholar
[45] Gomez CG, Pastrana G, Serrano D, Zuzek E, Villar MA, Strumia MC. Polymer 2012, 53, 2949–2955.10.1016/j.polymer.2012.04.040Search in Google Scholar
[46] Hong SD. Basic of Reservoir Petrophysics, Petroleum Industry Press: Beijing, PRC, 1985 (In Chinese).Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original articles
- Visualization and simulation of filling process of simultaneous co-injection molding based on level set method
- Effect of compatibilizer on the properties of PBS/lignin composites prepared via a vane extruder
- Fabrication and characterization of thermally conductive composites based on poly(butylene terephthalate)/glass fiber-silicon carbide
- Preparation and characterization of poly(MMA-EGDMA-AMPS) microspheres by soap-free emulsion polymerization
- Modification of biaxially oriented polypropylene films using dicyclopentadiene based hydrogenated hydrocarbon resin
- Investigation of synthesis and processing of cellulose, cellulose acetate and poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers incorporating anti-cancer/tumor drug cis-diammineplatinum (II) dichloride using electrospinning techniques
- Grafting poly(2-acryloyloxyethyl trimethyl ammonium chloride) branches onto the backbones of corn starch for toughening starch film
- Erosion characteristics of Teflon under different operating conditions
- Development of sustainable resource based poly(urethane-etheramide)/Fe2O3 nanocomposite as anticorrosive coating materials
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original articles
- Visualization and simulation of filling process of simultaneous co-injection molding based on level set method
- Effect of compatibilizer on the properties of PBS/lignin composites prepared via a vane extruder
- Fabrication and characterization of thermally conductive composites based on poly(butylene terephthalate)/glass fiber-silicon carbide
- Preparation and characterization of poly(MMA-EGDMA-AMPS) microspheres by soap-free emulsion polymerization
- Modification of biaxially oriented polypropylene films using dicyclopentadiene based hydrogenated hydrocarbon resin
- Investigation of synthesis and processing of cellulose, cellulose acetate and poly(ethylene oxide) nanofibers incorporating anti-cancer/tumor drug cis-diammineplatinum (II) dichloride using electrospinning techniques
- Grafting poly(2-acryloyloxyethyl trimethyl ammonium chloride) branches onto the backbones of corn starch for toughening starch film
- Erosion characteristics of Teflon under different operating conditions
- Development of sustainable resource based poly(urethane-etheramide)/Fe2O3 nanocomposite as anticorrosive coating materials