Home Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Por mí como si te operas. Constructional idioms of rejection from a constructionist approach

  • Pedro Ivorra Ordines EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 11, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The present study explores partially filled idioms that go beyond the limits of the Spanish phraseological tradition, in that it focuses on semi-schematic patterns that had been relegated to the periphery and does not restrict itself to the pairing phraseological expression and lexicalized form. With a corpus comprising 592 instances extracted from the esTenTen18 corpus (Sketch Engine), the objective in the study of the constructional idioms [a PRON como si X] and [por PRON como si X] is twofold. First, to shed light on the “pragmatic point” (Kay and Fillmore 1999) of these discontinuous patterns by describing their rejection illocutionary force, their colloquial dialogic context, and their intensifying speech act; and second, to delve into the lexical variability of the constructions under study in the intersection of creativity and extravagance.

References

Albelda Marco, Marta. 2022. Rhetorical questions as reproaching devices. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict.10.1075/jlac.00077.albSearch in Google Scholar

Amigot Castillo, Laura. 2015. Las fórmulas rutinarias expresivas del alemán y del español: estudio teórico y análisis pragmático comparado. Doctoral Thesis: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/28135/ (accessed 3 April 2023).Search in Google Scholar

d’Avis, Franz & Rita Finkbeiner. 2019. Was ist Expressivität? In Franz d’Avis & Rita Finkbeiner (eds.), Expressivität im Deutschen, 1–22. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110630190-001Search in Google Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.8Search in Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander. 2018. Learn the Rules like a Pro, so you can Break them like an Artist (Picasso): Linguistic Aberrancy from a Constructional Perspective. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 277–293. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zaa-2018-0025/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/zaa-2018-0025/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander. 2020. Learning formulaic creativity: Chunking in verbal art and speech – a response to Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas. Cognitive Semiotics 13(1). Special Issue: Construction Grammar and Creativity. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2024/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/cogsem-2020-2024/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2002. Constructional Idioms, Morphology, and the Dutch Lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14(4). 301–327. https://research.vu.nl/ws/files/1845295/150494.pdf (accessed 5 April 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Borrego Nieto, Julio, Emilio Jesús Prieto de los Mozos & José Jesús Gómez Asencio. 1985. El subjuntivo: usos y valores. Madrid: Sociedad General Española de Librería.Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. The Extremes of Insubordination: Exclamatory as if! Journal of English Linguistics 42(2). 93–113. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0075424214521425 (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1177/0075424214521425Search in Google Scholar

Briz, Antonio. 1998. El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Use and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2013. Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004Search in Google Scholar

Cappelle, Bert. 2006. Particle placement and the case for “allostructions”. Constructions. Special Volume 1. https://constructions.journals.hhu.de/article/view/381 (accessed 22 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Cascón Martín, Eugenio. 2000. Español coloquial. Rasgos, formas y fraseología de la lengua diaria. Madrid: Edinumen.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.21236/AD0616323Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2020. Are changes transmitted mistakes? Cognitive Semiotics 13(1). Special Issue: Construction Grammar and Creativity. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2022/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/cogsem-2020-2022/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

De Wit, Astrid, Peter Petré & Frank Brisard. 2020. Standing out with the progressive. Journal of Linguistics 56(3). 479–514. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-linguistics/article/standing-out-with-the-progressive/F4B79B2B270614664C781F705AAFDD80 (accessed 11 April 2023).10.1017/S0022226719000501Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2016. Frequency and lexical specificity in grammar: A critical review. In Heike Behrens & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Experience Counts: Frequency Effects in Language, 209–238. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110346916-009Search in Google Scholar

Esteban Fonollosa, Maricel & Pedro Ivorra Ordines. 2023. Hasta los huesos, bis in die Knochen. Construcciones fraseológicas somáticas en contraste a través de corpus. Revista de Filología Alemana 31.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2009. Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolavea (ed.), Finitness, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6(3). 353–375. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4177882 (accessed 29 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Felfe, Marc. 2012. Transitive Resultativkonstruktionen in der Konstruktionsgrammatik. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 40(3). 352–395. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zgl-2012-0026/html?lang=de accessed 10 April 202310.1515/zgl-2012-0026/html?lang=deSearch in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 2002. Idiomaticity. Lecture notes from the spring 2002. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/bcg/lec02.html (accessed 10 April 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64(3). 501–538. http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/23e2/7224928a008c5be84a7ea1452e0c627fe380.pdf (accessed 5 April 2023)Search in Google Scholar

Finkbeiner, Rita. 2021. Konstruktionen an der Grammatik-Pragmatik Schnittstelle. Linguistische Berichte 265(1). 1–33.10.46771/2366077500265_1Search in Google Scholar

Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 2020. Fijación fraseológica de construcciones de contenido procedimental. In Carmen Mellado Blanco & Enrique Gutiérrez Rubio (coords.): Nuevas aportaciones de la Gramática de Construcciones a los estudios de fraseología en las lenguas románcias. Special Issue Romanica Olomucensia 32(1). 13–28. https://romanica.upol.cz/pdfs/rom/2020/01/14.pdf (accessed 5 April 2023)10.5507/ro.2020.001Search in Google Scholar

Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 2021. Enunciados independientes (de rechazo) y construcciones en intervención reactiva. In Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez, María Ester Brenes Peña & Víctor Pérez Béjar (eds.), Sintaxis discursiva: construcciones y operadores en español, 25–62. Berlin: Peter Lang.10.3726/b18594Search in Google Scholar

Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 2023. Construcciones exclamativas de rechazo. Spanish in Context. https://benjamins.com/catalog/sic.21026.rod (accessed 22 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina & Esperanza R. Alcaide Lara. 1996. La expresión de la modalidad en el habla de Sevilla. Sevilla: Servicio de publicaciones del Ayuntamiento de Sevilla.Search in Google Scholar

García-Page Sánchez, Mario. 2007. Esquemas sintácticos de formación de locuciones adverbiales. Moenia 13. 121–144. https://minerva.usc.es/xmlui/handle/10347/6069 (accessed 22 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar

García-Page Sánchez, Mario. 2008. Introducción a la fraseología española. Estudio de las locuciones. Barcelona: Anthropos.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language: Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc772nnSearch in Google Scholar

Gras Manzano, Pedro. 2010. Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. Doctoral Thesis: Universitat de Barcelona. https://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/1716#page=1 (accessed 5 April 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Gras Manzano, Pedro. 2016. Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination. Insubordinate que-constructions in Spanish. In Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), Insubordination, 113–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.115.05graSearch in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Stefan & Tobias Ungerer. 2023. Attack of the snowclones: A corpus-based analysis of extravagant formulaic patterns. Journal of Linguistics. 1–26. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-linguistics/article/attack-of-the-snowclones-a-corpusbased-analysis-of-extravagant-formulaic-patterns/B6A3C6D3E5B4C3BBEBB8332901565A63 (accessed 14 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Hennecke, Inga & Evelyn Wiesinger. 2023. Construction Grammar meets Hispanic linguistics. In Inga Hennecke & Evelyn Wiesinger (eds.), Constructions in Spanish, 2–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.34.01henSearch in Google Scholar

Henning, Susanne. 2015. La construcción de la imagen social en dos pares adyacentes: opinión-acuerdo/desacuerdo y ofrecimiento-aceptación/rechazo. Doctoral Thesis: Stockholm University. http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:846325/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed 28 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Herrero Moreno, Gema. 2002. Los actos disentivos. Verba 29. 221–242. https://minerva.usc.es/xmlui/handle/10347/3368 (accessed 28 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2018. Creativity and Construction Grammar: Cognitive and Psychological Issues. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 259–276. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zaa-2018-0024/html (accessed 23 June 2023).10.1515/zaa-2018-0024Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2019. Language and Creativity. A construction Grammar approach to linguistic creativity. Linguistic Vanguard 5(1). https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0019/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/lingvan-2019-0019/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2020. Construction Grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology, and cognitive science. Cognitive Semiotics 13(1). Special Issue Construction Grammar and Creativity. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2018/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/cogsem-2020-2018/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2022. Constructionist approaches to creativity. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10(1). 259–284. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gcla-2022-0012/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/gcla-2022-0012/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Ivorra Ordines, Pedro. 2021. Les Construccions comparatives intensificadores de la lletjor en català, espanyol, anglès i francès des de les gramàtiques de construccions: un estudi basat en corpus. Doctoral Thesis: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/672700#page=2 (accessed 4 April 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Ivorra Ordines, Pedro. 2022. Comparative constructional idioms. A corpus-based study of the creativity of the [más feo que X] construction. In Carmen Mellado Blanco (ed.), Productive Patterns in Phraseology and Construction Grammar. A Multilingual Approach, 29–52. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110520569-002Search in Google Scholar

Ivorra Ordines, Pedro. In press. Dime con quién te juntas y te diré quién eres. Substantive idioms from Construction Grammar. In Torsten Leuschner, Jóhanna Barðdal, Gauthier Delaby and Anaïs Vajnovszki (eds.), How to do things with corpora – Methodological issues and case studies. Springer Nature.Search in Google Scholar

Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Carmen Mellado Blanco. 2021. Más tontos que el novio de la Chelo. La intensificación de la estulticia en foros y chats por medio de comparaciones creativas: una aproximación desde la Gramática de Construcciones. Estudios Románicos. La intensidad en las lenguas románicas como estrategia comunicativa 30. 39–58. https://revistas.um.es/estudiosromanicos/article/view/471241/308431 (accessed 28 March 2023).10.6018/ER.471241Search in Google Scholar

Ivorra Ordines, Pedro & Carmen Mellado Blanco. 2023. … und ich sage dir, wer du bist. The creative potential of proverbs from a contrastive point of view. A constructionist approach. Paper presented at the 45th Annual meeting of the German Linguistic Society. Dynamics at the lexicon-syntax interface: creativity and routine in word-formation and multi-word expressions, University of Cologne, 7–10 March.Search in Google Scholar

Jiménez Juliá, Tomás. 2003. Como en español actual. Verba 30. 117–161. https://minerva.usc.es/xmlui/handle/10347/3399 (accessed 29 March 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Kay, Paul. 2004. Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 675–700. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch30Search in Google Scholar

Kempf, Luise & Stefan Hartmann. 2022. What’s extravagant about be-sandal-ed feet? Morphology, semantics and pragmatics of German pseudo-particles. In Matthias Eitelmann & Dagmar Haumann (eds.), Extravagant Morphology: Studies in rule-bending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology, 19–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.223.02kemSearch in Google Scholar

Leclercq, Benoît. 2019. Coercion. A case of saturation. Constructions and Frames 11(2). 270–289. https://benjamins.com/catalog/cf.00031.lec (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1075/cf.00031.lecSearch in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1969. A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Lensch, Anke. 2022. Diggers-out, leaf clearer-uppers and stayer-onner-for-nowers. On creativity and extravagance in English -er nominalisations. In Matthias Eitelmann & Dagmar Haumann (eds.), Extravagant Morphology. Studies in rule-blending, pattern-extending and theory-challenging morphology, 73–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.223.04lenSearch in Google Scholar

Mellado Blanco, Carmen. 2009. Utilidad y limitaciones de los corpora informáticos en la elaboración de un tesauro fraseológico (alemán-español). In Pascual Cantos Gómez & Aquilino Sánchez Pérez (eds.), A Survey on Corpus-based Research. Panorama de investigaciones basadas en corpus, 138–151. Murcia: Asoc. Española de Lingüística de Corpus (AELINCO).Search in Google Scholar

Mellado Blanco, Carmen. 2020a. Esquemas fraseológicos y construcciones fraseológicas en el contínuum léxico-gramática. In Carsten Sinner, Encarnación Tabares & Esteban Montoro del Arco (eds.), Clases y categorías en la fraseología española, 13–36. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Mellado Blanco, Carmen. 2020b. Sobre el insulto en español y alemán: el insulto con zoónimos. In Alfonso Corbacho Sánchez & Mar Campos Fernández-Fígares (eds.), Nuevas reflexiones sobre la fraseología del insulto, 169–196. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Montolío, Estrella. 1999. Las construcciones condicionales. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 3643–3737. Madrid: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Montoro del Arco, Esteban. 2008. El concepto de “locuciones con casillas vacías”. In Carmen Mellado Blanco (ed.), Colocaciones y fraseología en los diccionarios, 131–146. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Mura, Angela. 2019. La fraseología del desacuerdo: los esquemas fraseológicos en español. Sevilla: Editoral Universidad de Sevilla.10.12795/9788447221769Search in Google Scholar

Neels, Jakob, Stefan Hartmann & Tobias Ungerer. 2023. A quantum of salience. Reconsidering the role of extravagance in grammaticalization. In Hendrik De Smet, Peter Petré & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Context, Intent and Variation in Grammaticalization, 47–77. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110753059-003Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu & Matti Rissanen. 2002. Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24(3–4). 359–380. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000101000389 (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00038-9Search in Google Scholar

Olza Moreno, Inés. 2011. ¡Qué fraseología ni qué narices!: fraseologismos somáticos del español y expresión del rechazo metapragmático. In Antonio Pamies Bertrán, Juan de Dios Luque Durán & Patricia Fernández Martín (coords.), Paremiología y herencia cultural, 181–192. Granada: Granada Lingüística.Search in Google Scholar

Östman, Jan-Öla. 2015. From Construction Grammar to Construction Discourse… and back. In Jörg Bücker, Susanne Günthner & Wolfgang Imo (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V: Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequenziellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten, 15–44. Tübingen: Stauffenburg verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Peña, M. Sandra & Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza. 2017. Construing and constructing hyperbole. In Angeliki Athanasiadou (ed.), Studies in Figurative Thought and Language, 41–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter. 2016. Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation. Micro-changes in the grammaticalization of [be going to INF]. In Katrien Beuls & Remin van Trijp (eds.), Belgian Journal of Linguistics. Computational Construction Grammar and Constructional Change, 115–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/bjl.30.06pet (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1075/bjl.30.06petSearch in Google Scholar

Portolés Lázaro, José. 2001. Marcadores del discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Sampson, Geoffrey. 2016. Two ideas of creativity. In Martin Hinton (ed.), Evidence, experiment and argument in linguistics and philosophy of language, 15–26. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Sawada, Shigeyuki. 2000. The semantics of the ‘body part off’ construction. English Linguistics 17(2). 361–385.10.9793/elsj1984.17.361Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system. Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Franziska Günther. 2016. Toward a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language. Frontiers in Psychology 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110/full (accessed 11 April 2023).10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110/fullSearch in Google Scholar

Schwenter, Scott. 1999. Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity and Exclusivity. Garland, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1980. Actos de habla. Ensayo de filosofía del lenguaje. Madrid: Cátedra.Search in Google Scholar

Sommerer, Lotte. 2022. Day to day and night after night. Temporal NPN constructions in Present Day English. In Lotte Sommerer & Evelin Keizer (eds.), English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective: Current Issues, 363–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.221.10somSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 37–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2008. Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. In Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, Selection, Development—Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change, 219–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110205398.3.219Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2015. Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 51–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.18.02traSearch in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Trousdale, Graeme. 2020. Creativity, reuse, and regularity in music and language. In Thomas Hoffmann (ed.), Cognitive Semiotics 13(1). Special Issue Construction Grammar and Creativity. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2021/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/cogsem-2020-2021/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Uhrig, Peter. 2018. I don’t want to go all Yoko Ono on you. Creativity and Variation in a Family of Constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). Special Issue Linguistic Creativity. 295–308. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zaa-2018-0026/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/zaa-2018-0026/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Uhrig, Peter. 2020. Creative intentions – The fine line between ‘creative’ and ‘wrong’. In Thomas Hoffmann (ed.), Cognitive Semiotics 13(1). Special Issue Construction Grammar and Creativity. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2027/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/cogsem-2020-2027/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Weiss, Selina & Oliver Wilhelm. 2020. Coda: Creativity in psychological research versus in linguistics – Same but different? Cognitive Semiotics 13(1). Special Issue Construction Grammar and Creativity. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2029/html (accessed 22 June 2023).10.1515/cogsem-2020-2029/htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre. 2017. Relevance Theory. In Yan Huang (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, 79–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.25Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2012. Explaining irony. In Dreidre Wilson & Dan Sperberg (eds.), Meaning and Relevance, 123–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139028370.008Search in Google Scholar

Zamora Muñoz, Pablo. 2014. Los límites del discurso repetido: la fraseología periférica y las unidades fraseológicas pragmáticas. Verba 41(3). 213–236. https://revistas.usc.gal/index.php/verba/article/view/980 (accessed 6 April 2023).10.15304/verba.41.980Search in Google Scholar

Zuluaga, Alberto. 1980. Introducción al estudio de las expresiones fijas. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-11-11
Published in Print: 2023-11-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phras-2023-0005/html
Scroll to top button