Exploring and explaining variation in phrase-final f0 movements in spontaneous Papuan Malay

References

Albert, Aviad, Francesco Cangemi & Martine Grice. 2018. Using periodic energy to enrich acoustic representations of pitch in speech: A demonstration. Speech Prosody 2018. 804–808. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-162.Search in Google Scholar

Arvaniti, Amalia. 2019. Crosslinguistic variation, phonetic variability, and the formation of categories in intonation. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero & Marija Tabain (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1–6. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science; Technology Association Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan, Nanette Veilleux, Alejna Brugos & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2012. Tonal Center of Gravity: A global approach to tonal implementation in a level-based intonational phonology. Laboratory Phonology 3(2). 337–383. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2012-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Baumann, Stefan & Martine Grice. 2006. The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10). 1636–1657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.017.Search in Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E. & Janet B. Pierrehumbert. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3. 255–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000066X.Search in Google Scholar

Bögels, Sara & Francisco Torreira. 2015. Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction. Journal of Phonetics 52. 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, Bettina. 2006. Phonetics and phonology of thematic contrast in German. Language and Speech 49(4). 451–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309060490040201.Search in Google Scholar

Büring, Daniel. 2010. Towards a typology of focus realization. In Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds.), Information structure, 177–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Buxó-Lugo, Andrés & Chigusa Kurumada. 2019. Encoding and decoding of meaning through structured variability in intonational speech prosody (preprint). PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9y7xj.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Cecilia E. Ford (eds.). 2004. Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation [OCLC: ocm56526714]. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins Pub. Co.10.1075/tsl.62Search in Google Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation, 2nd edn. Cambirdge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166973Search in Google Scholar

Cruz, Marisa, Verònica Crespo-Sendra, Joelma Castelo & Sonia Frota. 2022. Asking questions across Portuguese varieties. In Marisa Cruz & Sónia Frota (eds.), Prosodic variation (with)in languages: intonation, phrasing and segments, 36–70. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Dahan, Delphine, Michael K. Tanenhaus & Craig G. Chambers. 2002. Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 47(2). 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00001-3.Search in Google Scholar

Enfield, Nick, Mark Dingemanse, Julija Baranova, Joe Blythe, Penelope Brown, Tyko Dirksmeyer, Paul Drew, Simeon Floyd, Sonja Gipper, Rósa S. Gísladóttir, Gertie Hoymann, Kobin H. Kendrick, Stephen C. Levinson, Lilla Magyari, Elizabeth Manrique, Giovanni Rossi, Lila San Roque & Francisco Torreira. 2012. Huh? What? – a first survey in twenty-one languages. In Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding, 343–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511757464.012Search in Google Scholar

Ford, Cecilia E. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1996, December. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 1st edn. 134–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003Search in Google Scholar

Frota, Sonia. 2016. Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: Phonological phrasing and intonation [OCLC: 941440408]. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Frota, Sonia, Marisa Cruz, Flaviane Svartman, Gisela Collischonn, Aline Fonseca, Carolina Serra, Pedro Oliveira & Marina Vigário. 2015, June. Intonational variation in Portuguese: European and Brazilian varieties. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonation in Romance, 1st edn., 235–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685332.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Goedemans, Rob & Ellen Van, Zanten. 2007. Stress and accent in Indonesian. In Vincent, J. & Ellen Van Zanten (eds.), Prosody in Indonesian languages (LOT Occasional Series), 35–62. Utrecht: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. Available at: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/296769.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew K. 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Word stress, 83–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139600408.005Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew K. & Timo Roettger. 2017. Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic survey. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1). 20170007. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Martine, D. Robert Ladd & Amalia Arvaniti. 2000. On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology 17(2). 143–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700003924.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Martine, Simon Ritter, Henrik Niemann & Timo B Roettger. 2017. Integrating the discreteness and continuity of intonational categories. Journal of Phonetics 64. 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

Gubian, Michele. 2011. Functional data analysis for phonetic research [Publisher: University of Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Type: urn:nbn:nl:ui:22-2066/94426]. Workshop on New Tools and Methods for Very-Large-Scale Phonetics Research (VLSP 2011), DVD. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2066/94426.Search in Google Scholar

Gubian, Michele, Francisco Torreira & Lou Boves. 2015. Using Functional Data Analysis for investigating multidimensional dynamic phonetic contrasts. Journal of Phonetics 49. 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

Ha, Kieu-Phuong & Martine Grice. 2017. Tone and intonation in discourse management – how do speakers of Standard Vietnamese initiate a repair? Journal of Pragmatics 107. 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.11.006.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Intonation and grammar in British English [OCLC: 1165552521]. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357447 (accessed 21 May 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Hamzah, Diyana & James Sneed German. 2014. Intonational phonology and prosodic hierarchy in Malay. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2014.10.21437/Interspeech.2014-22Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & D. Robert Ladd. 2008. Prosodic description: An introduction for fieldworkers. Language Documentation & Conservation 2(2). 244–274.Search in Google Scholar

Hualde, José Ignacio. 2009. Unstressed words in Spanish. Language Sciences 31(2–3). 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

Jacewicz, Ewa & Robert Allen Fox. 2015. Intrinsic fundamental frequency of vowels is moderated by regional dialect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138(4). EL405–EL410. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4934178.Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.). 2005. Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.). 2014. Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jun, Sun-Ah & Janet Fletcher. 2014, January. Methodology of studying intonation: From data collection to data analysis. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology II, 493–519. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0016Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn. 2019. Acoustic correlates of word stress in Papuan Malay. Journal of Phonetics 74. 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2019.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn. 2021a. Contour clustering: A field-data-driven approach for documenting and analysing prototypical f0 contours. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 53(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100321000049.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn. 2021b. The perception of word stress cues in Papuan Malay: A typological perspective and experimental investigation. Laboratory Phonology 12(1). 1–33.https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6447.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn & Stefan Baumann. 2020. Demarcating and highlighting in Papuan Malay phrase prosody. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147(4). 2974–2988. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001008.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn & T. Mark Ellison. 2023. Evaluating cluster analysis on f0 contours: An information theoretic approach on three languages. In Radek Skarnitzl & Jan Volín (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 3448–3452. Prague: Guarant International.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn & Matthew K. Gordon. 2022. The role of f0 shape and phrasal position in Papuan Malay and American English word identification. Phonetica 79(3). 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2022-2022.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn & Nikolaus P Himmelmann. 2020. Time-series analysis of F0 in Papuan Malay contrastive focus. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2020, 230–234.10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-47Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn, Angela Kluge & Vincent J. van Heuven. 2021. Lexical analyses of the function and phonology of Papuan Malay word stress. Phonetica 78(2). 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2021-2003.Search in Google Scholar

Kaland, Constantijn, Marc Swerts & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2023. Red and blue bananas: Time-series f0 analysis of contrastively focused noun phrases in Papuan Malay and Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 96. 101200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101200.Search in Google Scholar

Kingston, John. 2007. Segmental influences on F0: Automatic or controlled? [Series Title: Phonology and Phonetics]. In Aditi Lahiri, Carlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds.), Tones and tunes: Experimental studies in word and sentence prosody, 171–210. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207576.2.171Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, James P. & D. Robert Ladd. 2016. Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel F0: Evidence from “true voicing” languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140(4). 2400–2411. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4962445.Search in Google Scholar

Kluge, Angela. 2017. A grammar of Papuan Malay. Utrecht: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Knowles, Gerry. 1978. The nature of phonological variables in Scous. In Peter Trudgill (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 80–90. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Kochanski, Greg, Esther Grabe, Jerald Coleman & Burton Rosner. 2005. Loudness predicts prominence: Fundamental frequency lends little. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(2). 1038–1054. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1923349.Search in Google Scholar

Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts. 2001. On the alleged existence of contrastive accents. Speech Communication 34(4). 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00058-3.Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonational phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808814Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert & Kim E. Silverman. 1984. Vowel intrinsic pitch in connected speech. Phonetica 41(1). 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261708.Search in Google Scholar

Lehiste, Ilse & Gordon E. Peterson. 1961. Some basic considerations in the analysis of intonation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33(4). 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908681.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Joan K.-Y., Valter Ciocca & Tara L. Whitehill. 2006. Effect of intonation on Cantonese lexical tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(6). 3978–3987. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2363927.Search in Google Scholar

Maskikit-Essed, Raechel & Carlos Gussenhoven. 2016. No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: The case of Ambonese Malay. Phonology 33(2). 353–389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675716000154.Search in Google Scholar

Mixdorff, Hansjörg & Oliver Niebuhr. 2013. The influence of F0 contour continuity on prominence perception. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH.10.21437/Interspeech.2013-73Search in Google Scholar

Mohd Don, Zuraidah, Gerry Knowles & Janet Yong. 2008. How words can be misleading: A study of syllable timing and “stress” in Malay. The Linguistic Journal 3. 66–81.Search in Google Scholar

Paauw, Scott H. 2009. The Malay contact varieties of eastern Indonesia: A typological comparison. http://ubir.buffalo.edu/xmlui/handle/10477/45490 (accessed 11 July 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Potisuk, Siripong, Jack Gandour & Mary P. Harper. 1996. Acoustic correlates of stress in Thai. Phonetica 53(4). 200–220. https://doi.org/10.1159/000262201.Search in Google Scholar

Prieto, Pilar. 2014. The intonational phonology of Catalan. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology II, 43–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2019. R: The R project for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed 11 July 2019).Search in Google Scholar

R Studio Team. 2019. RStudio: Integrated development for R. https://www.rstudio.com/ (accessed 11 July 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Rialland, Annie. 2007. Question prosody: An African perspective [Series Title: Phonology and Phonetics]. In Aditi Lahiri, Tomas Riad & Carlos Gussenhoven (eds.), Tones and tunes: Typological studies in word and sentence prosody, 35–62. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207569.35Search in Google Scholar

Riesberg, Sonja & Nikolaus P Himmelmann. 2012. The DoBeS summits-PAGE collection of Papuan Malay. https://hdl.handle.net/1839/00-0000-0000-0019-FF78-5 (accessed 11 July 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Riesberg, Sonja, Janina Kalbertodt, Stefan Baumann & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2018. On the perception of prosodic prominences and boundaries in Papuan Malay. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/1402559 (accessed 30 March 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Riesberg, Sonja, Janina Kalbertodt, Stefan Baumann & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2020. Using Rapid Prosody Transcription to probe little-known prosodic systems: The case of Papuan Malay. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 11(1). 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.192.Search in Google Scholar

Rissanen, Jorma. 1978. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica 14(5). 465–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, Phil. 1987. Considerations in the normalisation of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication 6(4). 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(87)90009-4.Search in Google Scholar

Savino, Michelina. 2012. The intonation of polar questions in Italian: Where is the rise? Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42(1). 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002510031100048X.Search in Google Scholar

Savino, Michelina, Loredana Lapertosa, Alessandro Caffò & Mario Refice. 2019. Prosodic convergence in Italian game dialogues. In 7th Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, 151–154.10.36505/ExLing-2016/07/0034/000293Search in Google Scholar

Sbranna, Simona, Caterina Ventura, Aviad Albert & Martine Grice. 2023. Prosodic marking of information status in Italian. Journal of Phonetics 97. 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2023.101212.Search in Google Scholar

Simard, Candide. 2013. Prosodic encoding of declarative, interrogative and imperative sentences in Jaminjung, a language of Australia. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2013, 793–797.10.21437/Interspeech.2013-229Search in Google Scholar

Steele, Shirley A. 1986. Interaction of vowel F0 and prosody. Phonetica 43(1–3). 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261763.Search in Google Scholar

Stoel, Ruben. 2007. The intonation of Manado Malay. In Vincent J. Van Heuven & Ellen Van Zanten (eds.), Prosody in Indonesian languages, 117–150. Utrecht: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Thomas Kneib, Thomas Augustin & Achim Zeileis. 2008. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics 9(1). 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307.Search in Google Scholar

Strobl, Carolin, James Malley & Gerhard Tutz. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14(4). 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016973.Search in Google Scholar

Swerts, Marc & Ronald Geluykens. 1994. Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and Speech 37(1). 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099403700102.Search in Google Scholar

Swerts, Marc, René Collier & Jacques Terken. 1994. Prosodic predictors of discourse finality in spontaneous monologues. Speech Communication 15(1–2). 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(94)90043-4.Search in Google Scholar

Swerts, Marc, Emiel Krahmer & Cinzia Avesani. 2002. Prosodic marking of information status in Dutch and Italian: A comparative analysis. Journal of Phonetics 30(4). 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2002.0178.Search in Google Scholar

Szczepek Reed, Beatrice. 2004. Turn-final intonation in English. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Cecilia E. Ford (eds.), Typological studies in language, 97–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.62.07szcSearch in Google Scholar

Van Heuven, Vincent J., Lilie Roosman & Ellen Van Zanten. 2008. Betawi Malay word prosody. Lingua 118(9). 1271–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

Wan, Aslynn. 2012. Instrumental phonetic study of the rhythm of Malay (Thesis) [Accepted: 2013-06-05T09:10:25Z]. Newcastle University. http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/1682 (accessed 5 November 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Whalen, Douglas H. & Andrea G. Levitt. 1995. The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics 23(3). 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Marvin N. & Andreas Ziegler. 2017. Ranger: A fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. Journal of Statistical Software 77(1). 1548–7660. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v077.i01.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Yi. 2011. Post-focus compression: Cross-linguistic distribution and historical origin. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Yi & Anqi Xu. 2021. Consonantal F0 perturbation in American English involves multiple mechanisms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149(4). 2877–2895. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0004239.Search in Google Scholar

Zuraidah, Mohd D. & Gerry Knowles. 2006. Prosody and turn-taking in Malay broadcast interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 38(4). 490–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.003.Search in Google Scholar