Abstract
The section 18b16–25 of the famous chapter 9 of Aristotle’s De interpretatione presents two objections against the assumption that both members of a contradictory pair of future singular statements might be false. This section is unlikely to be genuine, because (1) the first objection is either directly begging the question or misusing a previous argument in a question-begging way, (2) the second objection includes irrelevant observations, and (3) the rebuttal of the said assumption interrupts the intimate connection between the immediately preceding and following sections.
Verzeichnis der verwendeten Literatur
Ammonius, In Aristotelis De interpretatione commentarius, edidit A. Busse (CAG IV-5), Berlin 1897.10.1515/9783112361023Search in Google Scholar
Aristotelis Organon Graece. Novis codicum auxiliis adiutus recognovit, scholiis ineditis et commentario instruxit Th. Waitz. Pars prior: Categoriae, Hermeneutica, Analytica priora, pars posterior: Analytica posteriora, Topica, Leipzig 1844/1846 (Nachdruck Aalen 1965).Search in Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et liber de Interpretatione, recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit L. Minio-Paluello (Scriptorum Classicorum Bibliotheca Oxoniensis), Oxford 1949, 2. Aufl. 1956.10.1093/oseo/instance.00259049Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with Notes by J. L. Ackrill, Oxford 1963 (Nachdruck 1974).10.1093/oseo/instance.00258580Search in Google Scholar
Aristoteles, De interpretatione (Περὶ ἑρμηνείας), recognovit H. Weidemann (Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, Bd. 2014), Berlin/Boston 2014 [= 2014a].Search in Google Scholar
Aristoteles, Peri hermeneias, übersetzt und erläutert von H. Weidemann (Aristoteles, Werke in deutscher Übersetzung; begründet von E. Grumach, fortgeführt von H. Flashar, hrsg. von C. Rapp, Band 1, Teil II), Berlin 1994; 3., überarbeitete und verbesserte Aufl., Boston/Berlin 2014 [= 2014b].Search in Google Scholar
Aristoteles, Hermeneutik/Peri hermeneias, griechisch-deutsch, herausgegeben, übersetzt und erläutert von H. Weidemann (Sammlung Tusculum), Berlin/Boston 2015.10.1515/9783110409192Search in Google Scholar
Marcus Tullius Cicero, Über das Schicksal/De fato, lateinisch-deutsch, herausgegeben, übersetzt und erläutert von H. Weidemann (Sammlung Tusculum), Berlin/Boston 2019.Search in Google Scholar
W. Cavini, „La negazione di frase nella logica greca“, in: W. Cavini/M. C. Donnini Macciò/M. S. Funghi/D. Manetti, Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina, Firenze 1985, 7–126.Search in Google Scholar
F. C. Conybeare, A Collation with the Ancient Armenian Versions of the Greek Text of Aristotle’s Categories, De Interpretatione, De Mundo, De Virtutibus et Vitiis, and of Porphyry’s Introduction, Oxford 1892.Search in Google Scholar
P. Crivelli, Aristotle on Truth, Cambridge 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511482496Search in Google Scholar
D. Frede, Aristoteles und die „Seeschlacht“. Das Problem der Contingentia Futura in De Interpretatione 9, Göttingen 1970.Search in Google Scholar
R. Gaskin, The Sea Battle and the Master Argument. Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future, Berlin/New York 1995.10.1515/9783110866346Search in Google Scholar
R. E. Jones, „Truth and Contradiction in Aristotle’s De Interpretatione 6–9“, Phronesis 55, 2010, 26–67.10.1163/003188610X12589452898804Search in Google Scholar
R. Walzer, „On the Legacy of the Classics in the Islamic World“, in: R. Walzer, Greek into Arabic. Essays on Islamic Philosophy, Oxford 1962, 29–37.Search in Google Scholar
H. Weidemann, „De Interpretatione“, in: C. Shields (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, Oxford/New York 2012, 81–112.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187489.013.0005Search in Google Scholar
H. Weidemann, „Was ist echt im 13. Kapitel der Aristotelischen Hermeneutik und was nicht?“, Philologus 161, 2017, 187–215.10.1515/phil-2017-0009Search in Google Scholar
C. W. A. Whitaker, Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. Contradiction and Dialectic, Oxford 1996.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- The Dramatization of Emotions in Iliad 24.552–658
- Invocazione al “signore dell’anima che sempre vive”: Melanipp. PMG 762
- Ein interpoliertes Textstück im neunten Kapitel der Aristotelischen Hermeneutik
- Osservazioni su Philem. fr. 95 K.‑A. per la difesa del v. 2
- Lovely Earth (Leonidas of Tarentum Anth. Pal. 7.440 = Gow/Page, HE 11)
- Was tut ein Geschichtsschreiber?
- A New Supplement to Diogenes of Oenoanda’s Fr. 6 Smith: a Case of Epicurean Language Selection
- Genizah Ms. 17: an Extract from an Early Version of the Passio of St Plato of Ancyra, Part 1
- Catullus 6.17
- Alcune osservazioni su naturae species ratioque nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio (e una nota al testo)
- The Sorrowful Song of Philomela (Aetna 586–587)
- Miszellen
- Ὦ Φαληρεύς: Plato, Symp. 172a
- Two Conjectures in Apollonius Rhodius (1.723, 2.165)
- Una possibile eco antimachea in Nevio
- Antestari: Procedural Law in Curculio 620–625
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- The Dramatization of Emotions in Iliad 24.552–658
- Invocazione al “signore dell’anima che sempre vive”: Melanipp. PMG 762
- Ein interpoliertes Textstück im neunten Kapitel der Aristotelischen Hermeneutik
- Osservazioni su Philem. fr. 95 K.‑A. per la difesa del v. 2
- Lovely Earth (Leonidas of Tarentum Anth. Pal. 7.440 = Gow/Page, HE 11)
- Was tut ein Geschichtsschreiber?
- A New Supplement to Diogenes of Oenoanda’s Fr. 6 Smith: a Case of Epicurean Language Selection
- Genizah Ms. 17: an Extract from an Early Version of the Passio of St Plato of Ancyra, Part 1
- Catullus 6.17
- Alcune osservazioni su naturae species ratioque nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio (e una nota al testo)
- The Sorrowful Song of Philomela (Aetna 586–587)
- Miszellen
- Ὦ Φαληρεύς: Plato, Symp. 172a
- Two Conjectures in Apollonius Rhodius (1.723, 2.165)
- Una possibile eco antimachea in Nevio
- Antestari: Procedural Law in Curculio 620–625