The Joke-Coop: Pragmatic Issues of Jokes and Joking

Mira Magdalena Sickinger

doi:10.1515/phhumyb-2025-0002

Article

The Joke-Coop: Pragmatic Issues of Jokes and Joking

Mira Magdalena Sickinger

Published/Copyright: May 20, 2025

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook Volume 6 Issue 1

Abstract

This paper investigates the question whether jokes and joking demand cooperative communication; where jokes refer to fictional narratives and joking refers to the performative situation in which these are told. The investigation first offers an evaluation of the distinct properties inherent to the narrative joke’s form and its performance. This includes an analysis of Austin’s conception of the performative utterance. While Austin deliberately excludes joking from his theory, I show that a significant characteristic of joking is the convergence of the illocutionary and perlocutionary act. The investigation assesses further prerequisites for successful joke performances and proceeds with the examination whether Grice’s cooperative principle applies to joking, or whether these maxims are being violated within joking; and critically engages with Attardo’s and Raskin’s responses to this question, who claim the latter. I provide an important corrective to Attardo’s and Raskin’s positions by proposing an account that stresses pragmatic distinctions between jokes and joking and argues for the possibility of cooperative humorous communication.

Keywords: cooperative principle; narrative jokes; joking; joke performance; pragmatics of humor

References

Austin, John L. 1975 (1962). How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edition, edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà. Oxford: Clarendon/Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 1990. “The Violation of Grice’s Maxims in Jokes.” In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, edited by David J. Costa, 355 – 62. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v16i0.1726Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Ted. 1999. Jokes: Philosophical Thoughts on Joking Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226112329.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1940 (1905). “Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewußten.” in Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 6, edited by Anna Freud et al. London: Imago Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1960 (1905). Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Translated by James Strachey. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar. 2008. “Alief and Belief.” The Journal of Philosophy 105(10): 634 – 63.10.5840/jphil20081051025Search in Google Scholar

Gimbel, Steven. 2017. Isn’t That Clever: A Philosophical Account of Humor and Comedy. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315112633Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, 3, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41 – 58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Heller, Ágnes. 2005. Immortal Comedy: The Comic Phenomenon in Art, Literature and Life. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Search in Google Scholar

Hurley, Matthew M., Daniel C. Dennett, and Reginald B. Adams Jr. 2011. Inside Jokes: Using Humor to Reverse-Engineer the Mind. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9027.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, Chris A. 2022. “Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor.” The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 3: 179 – 208.10.1515/phhumyb-2022-006Search in Google Scholar

Marvin, Amy. 2023. “Oppression, Subversive Humor, and Unstable Politics.” The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 4: 163 – 86.10.1515/phhumyb-2023-0007Search in Google Scholar

Morreall, John. 1999. Comedy, Tragedy, and Religion. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Morreall, John. 2009. Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444307795Search in Google Scholar

Nealon, Jeffrey T. 2017. “Jokes and the Performative in Austin and Derrida; or, The Truth is a Joke?” Cultural Critique 95(1): 1 – 24.10.1353/cul.2017.a663842Search in Google Scholar

Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-6472-3Search in Google Scholar

Schutz, Charles E. 1995. “Cryptic Humor: the Subversive Message of Political Jokes.” Humor: 8(1): 51 – 64.10.1515/humr.1995.8.1.51Search in Google Scholar

Sickinger, Mira M. 2023. “‘Aha/Haha!—That’s a Good One!’: On the Correlation of Laughter and Understanding in Joke Reception.” In Philosophy of Humour: New Perspectives, edited by Daniel O’Shiel and Viktoras Bachmetjevas, Value Inquiry Books Series 389, 80 – 91. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004548817_007Search in Google Scholar

Voltolini, Alberto. 2021. “What We Can Learn from Literary Authors.” Acta Analytica 36: 479 – 99.10.1007/s12136-021-00467-zSearch in Google Scholar

Voltolini, Alberto. 2023. “Prolegomena to a Revised Theory of Humour.” In Philosophy of Humour: New Perspectives, edited by Daniel O’Shiel and Viktoras Bachmetjevas, Value Inquiry Books Series 389, 61 – 79. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004548817_006Search in Google Scholar

Wilk, Thomas, and Steven Gimbel. 2024. In on the Joke: The Ethics of Humor and Comedy. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110759853Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-05-20

Published in Print: 2025-05-20

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/phhumyb-2025-0002

Keywords for this article

cooperative principle; narrative jokes; joking; joke performance; pragmatics of humor