Spurred by Threats or Afraid of War? A Survey Experiment on Costs of Conflict in Support for Military Action

References

Aday, S. (2010). Leading the charge: media, elites, and the use of emotion in stimulating rally effects in wartime. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 440–465.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01489.xSearch in Google Scholar

Baker, W. D., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Patriotism or opinion leadership? The nature and origins of the ‘rally ’round the flag’ effect. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(4), 661–687.10.1177/0022002701045005006Search in Google Scholar

Baum, M. A. (2002). The constituent foundations of the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly, 46(2), 263–298.10.1111/1468-2478.00232Search in Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Review of general psychology. International Security, 5(4), 323–370.Search in Google Scholar

Berinsky, A. J. (2007). Assuming the costs of war: events, elites, and american public support for military conflict. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 975–997.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00602.xSearch in Google Scholar

Berinsky, A. J., & Kinder, D. R. (2006). Making sense of issues through media frames: understanding the kosovo crisis. Journal of Politics, 68(3), 640–656.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00451.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bueno de Mesquita, B., Morrow, J. D., Siverson, R. M., & Smith, A. (1999). An institutional explanation of the democratic peace. American Journal of Political Science, 93(4), 791–807.10.2307/2586113Search in Google Scholar

Caverley, J. D., & Krupnikov, Y. (2015). Aiming at doves: experimental evidence of military images’ political effects. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(7), 1482–1509.Search in Google Scholar

Colaresi, M. (2004). When doves cry: international rivalry, unreciprocated cooperation, and leadership turnover. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 555– 570.10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00087.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dafoe, Allan. (2011). Statistical critiques of the democratic peace: caveat emptor. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 247–262.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00487.xSearch in Google Scholar

de Heus, P., Hoogervorst, N., & van Dijk, E. (2010). Framing prisoners and chickens: valence effects in the prisoner’s dilemma and the chicken game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 736–742.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.013Search in Google Scholar

Flores-Macías, G. A., & Kreps, S. E. (2015). Borrowing support for war: the effect of war finance on public attitudes toward conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(5), 997– 1020.Search in Google Scholar

Fravel, M. T. (2005). Regime insecurity and international cooperation: explaining China’s compromises in territorial disputes. International Security, 30(2), 46–83.10.1162/016228805775124534Search in Google Scholar

Gartner, S. S. (2011). On behalf of a grateful nation: conventionalized images of loss and individual opinion change in war. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 545–561.10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00655.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gartzke, E., & Li, Q. (2003). Measure for measure: concept operationalization and the trade interdependence–conflict debate. Journal of Peace Research, 40(5), 553–571.10.1177/00223433030405004Search in Google Scholar

Getmansky, A., & Zeitzoff, T. (2014). Terrorism and voting: the effect of rocket threat on voting in Israeli elections. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 588–604.10.1017/S0003055414000288Search in Google Scholar

Gibler, D. M. 2012. The territorial peace: borders, state development, and international conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibler, D. M., Rider, T. J., & Hutchison, M. L. (2005). Taking arms against a sea of troubles: conventional arms races during periods of rivalry. Journal of Peace Research, 42(2), 131–147.10.1177/0022343305050687Search in Google Scholar

Glazier, R. A., & Boydstun, A. E. (2013). The president, the press, and the war: a tale of two framing agendas. Political Communication, 29(4), 428–446.Search in Google Scholar

Groeling, T., & Baum, M. A. (2008). Crossing the water’s edge: elite rhetoric, media coverage and the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon, 1979–2003. Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1065–1085.10.1017/S0022381608081061Search in Google Scholar

Hassin, R. R., Ferguson, M. J., Shidlovski, D., & Gross, T. (2007). Subliminal exposure to national flags affects political thought and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 19757–19761.10.1073/pnas.0704679104Search in Google Scholar

Iida, K., Kohno, M., & Sakaiya, S. (2012). Tracking with successive public opinion surveys – the senkaku and takeshima problems: what does the public think of the government’s response? [Renzoku Yoron Chosa de ou: Senkaku/Takeshima – Seifu no Taio o Kokumin wa dou Hyoka Shiteiruka]. Chuokoron, 127(16), 138–145.Search in Google Scholar

Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214.10.2307/2009958Search in Google Scholar

Johns, R., & Davies, G. A. M. (2012). Democratic peace or clash of civilizations? Target states and support for war in Britain and the United States. Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1038–1052.10.1017/S0022381612000643Search in Google Scholar

Lai, B., & Reiter, D. (2005). Rally ‘round the union jack? Public opinion and the use of force in the United Kingdom, 1948–2001. International Studies Quarterly, 49(2), 255–272.10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00344.xSearch in Google Scholar

Levendusky, M. S., & Horowitz, M. C. (2012). When backing down is the right decision: partisanship, new information, and audience costs. Journal of Politics, 74(2), 323–338.10.1017/S002238161100154XSearch in Google Scholar

Levy, J. S. (1992). An introduction to prospect theory. Political Psychology, 13(2), 171–186.Search in Google Scholar

Levy, J. S. (1997). Prospect theory, rational choice, and international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 41(1), 87–112.10.1111/0020-8833.00034Search in Google Scholar

Mansfield, E. D., & Pollins, B. M. (2001). The study of interdependence and conflict: recent advances, open questions, and directions for future research. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(6), 834–859.10.1177/0022002701045006007Search in Google Scholar

Mansfield, E. D., & Pollins, B. M. (Eds.). (2003). Economic interdependence and international conflict: new perspectives on an enduring debate. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maoz, Z. (1990). National choices and international processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: when reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156–163.10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.156Search in Google Scholar

Mueller, J. E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Science Review, 64(1), 18–34.10.2307/1955610Search in Google Scholar

Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2016). The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions.Search in Google Scholar

Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B. (1997). The classical liberals were right: democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly, 41(2), 267–293.10.1111/1468-2478.00042Search in Google Scholar

Oneal, J. R., Oneal, F. H., Maoz, Z., & Russett, B. (1996). The liberal peace: interdependence, democracy, and international conflict, 1950–1985. Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), 11–28.10.1177/0022343396033001002Search in Google Scholar

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piston, S. (2014). The political consequences of ignorance about income inequality. Presented at the 2014 annual meeting of the midwest political science association.Search in Google Scholar

Quek, K., & Johnston, A. I. (2018). Can China back down? Crisis de-escalation in the shadow of popular opposition. International Security, 42(3), 7–36.10.1162/ISEC_a_00303Search in Google Scholar

Reiter, D., & Tillman, E. R. (2002). Public, legislative, and executive constraints on the democratic initiation of conflict. Journal of Politics, 64(3), 810–826.10.1111/0022-3816.00147Search in Google Scholar

Rider, T. J. (2009). Understanding arms race onset: rivalry, threat, and territorial competition. Journal of Politics, 71(2), 693–703.10.1017/S0022381609090549Search in Google Scholar

Rider, T. J., Findley, M. G., & Diehl, P. F. (2011). Just part of the game? Arms races, rivalry, and war. Journal of Peace Research, 48(1), 85–100.10.1177/0022343310389505Search in Google Scholar

Rosecrance, R. (1986). The rise of the trading state: commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. International Security, 5(4), 296–320.Search in Google Scholar

Rummel, R. J. (1983). Libertarianism and international violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27(1), 27–71.10.1177/0022002783027001002Search in Google Scholar

Rummel, R. J. (1985). Libertarian propositions on violence within and between nations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 29(3), 419–455.10.1177/0022002785029003003Search in Google Scholar

Russett, B., & Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating peace: democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, G., & Gleditsch, N. P. (Eds.). (2013). Assessing the capitalist peace. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Soroka, S. N. (2014). Negativity in democratic politics: causes and consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, S. (2016). The microfoundations of territorial disputes: evidence from a survey experiment in Japan. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 33(5), 516–538.10.1177/0738894215581330Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, S., Tago, A., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2017). Seeing the lexus for the olive trees? Public opinion, economic interdependence, and interstate conflict. International Interactions, 43(3), 375–396.10.1080/03050629.2016.1200572Search in Google Scholar

Tir, J. (2010). Territorial diversion: diversionary theory of war and territorial conflict. Journal of Politics, 72(2), 413–425.10.1017/S0022381609990879Search in Google Scholar

Tomz, M. R., & Weeks, J. L. P. (2013). Public opinion and the democratic peace. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 849–865.10.1017/S0003055413000488Search in Google Scholar

Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: how political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 75–90.10.1017/S0003055402004240Search in Google Scholar

Vasquez, J. A. (2009). The war puzzle revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xiang, J., Xu, X., & Keteku, G. (2007). Power: the missing link in the trade conflict relationship. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(4), 646–663.10.1177/0022002707302802Search in Google Scholar

Zellman, A. (2015). Framing consensus: evaluating the narrative specificity of territorial indivisibility. Journal of Peace Research, 52(4), 492–507.10.1177/0022343314564713Search in Google Scholar