Startseite Vibration analysis of a sandwich cylindrical shell in hygrothermal environment
Artikel Open Access

Vibration analysis of a sandwich cylindrical shell in hygrothermal environment

  • Chunwei Zhang EMAIL logo , Qiao Jin , Yansheng Song , Jingli Wang , Li Sun EMAIL logo , Haicheng Liu , Limin Dun , He Tai , Xiaodong Yuan , Hongmei Xiao , Limeng Zhu und Songlin Guo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. Juni 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The sandwich structures are three- or multilayered structures such that their mechanical properties are better than each single layer. In the current research, a three-layered cylindrical shell including a functionally graded porous core and two reinforced nanocomposite face sheets resting on the Pasternak foundation is used as model to provide a comprehensive understanding of vibrational behavior of such structures. The core is made of limestone, while the epoxy is utilized as the top and bottom layers’ matrix phase and also it is reinforced by the graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). The pattern of the GNPs dispersion and the pores distribution play a crucial role at the continuous change of the layers’ properties. The sinusoidal shear deformation shells theory and the Hamilton’s principle are employed to derive the equations of motion for the mentioned cylindrical sandwich shell. Ultimately, the impacts of the model’s geometry, foundation moduli, mode number, and deviatory radius on the vibrational behavior are investigated and discussed. It is revealed that the natural frequency and rotation angle of the sandwich shell are directly related. Moreover, mid-radius to thickness ratio enhancement results in the natural frequency reduction. The results of this study can be helpful for the future investigations in such a broad context. Furthermore, for the pipe factories current study can be effective at their designing procedure.

1 Introduction

Structural analyses attracted higher levels of scholars’ attention nowadays. Among them, sandwich structures are well-known due to their high level of functionality. These structures are broadly implemented in ships, aerospace vehicles, and cargo containers. The porous type of sandwich structures meets extensive applications due to their lower weight to stiffness ratio. For instance, in the aircraft industries, aircraft with higher speed and stiffness and lower weight is accessible by the means of sandwich panels [1,2,3,4]. Depending on their application, sandwich structures may include three or more layers. Catania et al. [5] studied the mechanical damping behavior of multilayer components due to their wide range of applications. In their work, the results are validated by an experimental test. Beside this, plasma techniques are used by Rongong et al. [6] to generate constrained layer damping coatings on the metallic substrates. Also, in another work, Yu et al. [7] discussed the damping efficiency of the coating system based on the Reuss model and Hashin–shtrickman equation. In their work, the theoretical results showed that for a coating system, there is an optimum thickness of the coating layer that causes the coating structure obtain the best balance between the strength and the damping capacity. In two different works, Amir and his coresearchers [8,9] presented their findings of vibrational behavior of three-layered circular and annular plates, in which a rheological fluid core was put between two magnetostrictive face sheets. More recent sandwich structures exploit a core that is constituted of porous material to gain a lighter structure.

Furthermore, functionally graded materials (FGMs) are a new branch of elaborated engineering composite materials [10,11] that attracted the scientists’ attention. The layers constituted from FGMs are fully metallic at the bottom surface and fully ceramic at the top surface or vice versa. FGMs are first introduced by Koizumi [12]. Liu et al. [13] broadened our knowledge about FGMs by working on the wave propagation using a numerical technique. In another work, Han et al. [14] numerically studied FGMs’ transient wave propagation using another method. In 2002, Najafizadeh and Eslami [15] examined buckling the behavior of a circular FGM plate under radial loading. Arshid and Khorshidvand [16] examined the vibrational behavior of a saturated porous FG circular plate patched to piezoelectric face sheets using a differential quadrature method (DQM). One of the first works on the sandwich cylindrical shells dates back to 1995, in which Huang and Dasgupta [17] investigated the composite cylindrical shells to explain their free vibration behavior. After that, laminated cylindrical shells have been considered as a model to investigate static bending behavior under various boundary conditions using the differential cubature method [18]. In more recent years, the bending behavior of cylindrical sandwich panels has been evaluated by Pydah and Batra [19], who succeed to present an analytical solution for the mentioned bending behavior. In 2019, Sun et al. [20] experimentally investigated the different dynamic responses of the sandwich panels. They aimed to present a thorough guideline for the fabrication of sandwich panels with a higher ratio of blast protection capacity to weight. Electromechanical systems are exposed to different electrical and mechanical loadings and require a comprehensive study due to their important parameters. By the growth of the application of sandwich plates, more accurate plate theories are needed to obtain responses with higher accuracy. In the past decades, the FG plates and shells have been often analyzed using the first order shear deformation theory (FSDT) or higher order theories [21,22,23,24]. As an example, Trabelsi et al. [25] used modified FSDT to examine the thermal buckling of the FG plates and cylindrical shells. Based on the nonlocal elasticity theory, Ke et al. [26] took a nano piezoelectric cylindrical shell into consideration and investigated its vibrational behavior. They employed Love’s theory which is usually used for thin shells and also used DQM for solving the obtained differential equations. In a similar study, Razavi et al. [27] conducted a research on electromechanical vibrational response of nano cylinders. They derived the governing equations with the aid of the energy method and Hamilton’s principle and captured the size effect via the couple stress theory. As another instance, Khoa et al. [28] employed a cylindrical panel model which was reinforced by single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) to study the vibrations of the functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite (FG-CNTRC) cylindrical shells. For integrity, they applied the thermal environment on the entire structures and used higher-order shear deformation theory (HSDT). Nanoparticles and especially CNTs and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) specifications are discussed in numerous researches, recently [29,30,31,32,33]. Single-layered graphene sheets’ mechanical behavior and especially their buckling response, regarding the scale-effect, is considered by Fattahi et al. [34,35]. They attained the governing equations based on classical theory, FSDT, and HSDT. As another attempt, forced and free vibrational behaviors of a viscoelastic core equipped with GNPs-reinforced face sheets are examined by Mohseni and Shakouri [36]. They assumed face sheets are FG due to different types of GNPs distributions. A developed HSDT was applied to provide an analytical solution for the buckling capacity of sandwich plates containing cores with and without the GNPs reinforcement phase [37]. Moreover, free vibration and buckling analysis of cylindrical shells and sandwich plates is addressed by Kumar and Srinivasa [38]. After that, Ibrahim et al. [39] used FSDT to analyze the mechanical responses of FGM panels. Furthermore, Mehar and Panda [40] employed the finite element method to evaluate the temperature dependency of vibrational behavior of sandwich curved panel reinforced by functionally graded carbon nanotubes (FG-CNTs). In their paper, HSDT is used to derive displacement field equations. More recently, Karimiasl et al. [41] applied HSDT to assess doubly curved flexible core integrated with piezoelectric layers as a model to address the nonlinear vibration analysis. They concluded that an increment in the shaped memory alloys (SMA) volume fraction declined the frequency. Furthermore, the elasto-dynamic behavior of cylindrical tubes is evaluated by Ramezani and Mirzaei [42]. They assumed their model under moving pressures and different boundary conditions. In 2014, a new quasi-3D hyperbolic shear deformation theory for vibrational responses is proposed by Hebali et al. [43] to get more accurate results. This theory accounts for the stretching and shear deformation effects and eliminates their dependency on shear correction factor. Mirjavadi et al. [44] carried out a study on forced vibration of annular sector plates which are composed of the nanocomposite. They employed More–Tanaka approach to determine the material properties. In another study [45], they provided similar research, but for conical shells, and investigated the effect of different parameters on the results. Three types of porosity distributions are considered by Safaei [46] to analyze a multilayered sandwich plate whose core is made from porous materials. He used finite element method to obtain the results. Next, Sahmani et al. [47] provided a closed-form solution for examining vibrational response of small-scaled beams that are made from GNPs-reinforced composites. They derived the motion equations via HSDT to take the shear deformations into account. Moreover, they conducted another study [48] to consider the effect of size on the post-buckling behavior of plates that were reinforced by GNPs. Different types of GNPs dispersion patterns are considered by them. Most recently, Arshid and Amir [49] provided an investigation on the thermal buckling of porous-reinforced nanocomposite structures and concluded that adding GNPs to the structure may increase or decrease the critical buckling temperature, depending on their dispersion patterns. Beside this, Fan et al. [50] used modified couple stress theory (MCST) and examined the nonlinear oscillations of porous FG plates in nanoscale. They used NURBS-based isogeometric approach to gain the results. Wang et al. [51] performed nonlinear vibration analysis of porous shells that were reinforced with GNPs. They employed an improved Donnell nonlinear shell theory to formulate their model. A general approach is provided for the free vibration analysis of rotating functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite (FG-CNTRC) cylindrical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions by Qin et al. [52] based on FSDT. Also, a comparison study is presented by Qin et al. [53] on free vibrations of cylindrical shell with various boundary conditions using numerical methods. Shen et al. [54] considered effect of thermal environment on nonlinear vibration of functionally graded graphene nanoplatelets (FG-GNPs)-reinforced laminated cylindrical shells.

In the present paper, a sandwich cylindrical structure including FG porous core integrated by the GNPs-reinforced composites (GNP-RC) layers is considered as model to provide a comprehensive insight on its vibrational behavior. In the previously published papers, the sandwich cylindrical model with such exclusive configuration is not examined, yet. The sandwich structure is rested on the Pasternak foundation and the whole model is placed in a hygrothermal environment. As sinusoidal shear deformation shells theory (SSDST) is more accurate than lower-order theories, it is hired to gain more reliable results. Based on the Hamilton’s principle and variational approach, the equations of motion are derived and analytically solved. Finally, the influences of various parameters as porosity coefficient index and their distribution patterns, GNPs volume fraction index, and their dispersion types, geometry, mode number, and the moduli of foundation on the natural frequency of presented sandwich cylindrical shell are evaluated. The results could help in obtaining a deeper understanding of these structures which can be helpful in different industries, such as, automobiles, micro electro mechanical system (MEMS) processes, and aerospace.

2 Mathematical modeling

According to the cross-sectional view in Figure 1, the proposed model is a cylindrical sandwich shell including an FG porous core confined by two GNP-RC face sheets with mid-radius of R, length of L, and rotation angle of φ r resting on Pasternak elastic foundation. The structure is entirely subjected to hygrothermal loading. Also, h c, h t, and h b denote representatives of the z direction width of the porous core, top, and bottom skins. Moreover, the sum of the height of different parts serves as h representing the total height of the sandwich model. In the intermediate-plane of the shell, the cylindrical coordinate system (x, θ, z) is placed at the corner point in which x, θ, and z are axial, circumferential, and thickness directions of the model, respectively.

Figure 1 
               Cross-section view of the sandwich cylindrical shell subjected to hygrothermal loads.
Figure 1

Cross-section view of the sandwich cylindrical shell subjected to hygrothermal loads.

Strain components can be obtained by SSDST. Accordingly, the displacements of an arbitrary point either in porous core or in GNPs-RC face sheets can be presented as [55]:

(1) u ( x , θ , z , t ) = u 0 ( x , θ , t ) + f ( z ) λ x ( x , θ , t ) g ( z ) x w 0 ( x , θ , t ) , v ( x , θ , z , t ) = v 0 ( x , θ , t ) + f ( z ) λ θ ( x , θ , t ) 1 R g ( z ) θ w 0 ( x , θ , t ) , w ( x , θ , z , t ) = w 0 ( x , θ , t )

where u, v, and w are the movement components in the longitudinal, radial, and thickness direction, respectively. Moreover, u 0, v 0, and w 0 represent the movement components on the intermediate-plane; λ x and λ θ denote the rotation about θ and x-axes, respectively. Furthermore, f(z) and g(z) can be determined by SSDST as:

(2) f ( z ) = ( h / π ) sin ( π z / h ) , g ( z ) = z

Based on the Von Karman’s assumptions, strain field can be derived as [56,57]:

(3) ε x x = x u ( x , θ , z , t ) , ε θ θ = 1 R θ v ( x , θ , z , t ) + w 0 ( x , θ , z , t ) , γ x θ = x v ( x , θ , z , t ) + 1 R θ u ( x , θ , z , t ) , γ x z = x w ( x , θ , z , t ) + z u ( x , θ , z , t ) , γ θ z = 1 R θ w ( x , θ , z , t ) + z v ( x , θ , z , t )

By inserting displacement components of equation (1) into equation (3), the strains can be obtained based on the SSDST.

The stresses related to the core and face sheets in the hygrothermal environment can be presented by ref. [58,59]:

(4) σ x x σ θ θ σ θ z σ x z σ x θ = C 11 i C 12 i 0 0 0 C 12 i C 22 i 0 0 0 0 0 C 44 i 0 0 0 0 0 C 55 i 0 0 0 0 0 C 66 i × ε x x α 11 i Δ T β 11 i Δ H ε θ θ α 22 i Δ T β 22 i Δ H γ θ z γ x z γ x θ ; i = c , f

where C denotes the elastic coefficients and subscript c and f represent the porous core and GNP-RC face sheets, respectively. Moreover, α and β represent the coefficients related to thermal expansion and moisture expansion. ΔT and ΔH are the temperature alternation and moisture changes, one after another. A porous layer, made of Limestone, is used whose elastic coefficients can be written as [43]:

(5) C 11 c = C 22 c = E c ( z ) ( 1 + ν c ) ( 1 ν c ) , C 12 c = C 21 c = ν c E c ( z ) ( 1 + ν c ) ( 1 ν c ) , C 44 c = C 55 c = C 66 c = E c ( z ) 2 ( 1 + ν c )

where E c(z) and v c indicate Young’s elasticity modulus and Poisson’s ratio, respectively. The type of core porosity distribution is responsible for elastic coefficients variations.

In fact, the philosophy of pores’ presence is to help the weight reduction without having a considerable destructive impact on the mechanical properties of the whole sandwich model. It is revealed that the presence of pores inside the core results in lower magnitude of mechanical properties reduction in comparison with their presence within the face sheets. So, they assumed to exist only within the core layer. For even type of porosity distribution, pores become distributed symmetrically and elasticity modulus, density, and hygrothermal expansion coefficients distributions will be [60]:

(6a) E c ( z ) = E 0 [ 1 p cos ( π z / h c ) ] ,

(6b) { ρ c ( z ) , α c ( z ) , β c ( z ) } = { ρ 0 , α 0 , β 0 } [ 1 p m cos ( π z / h c ) ]

Where subscript 0 is the sign to address the material properties of the perfect layer. Also, p and p m are porosity and mass density coefficients which can be defined as [61]:

(7) p = 1 E 2 E 1 , p m = 1 ρ 2 ρ 1 = 1 1 p

E 1, E 2, and ρ 1, ρ 2 are maximum and minimum magnitudes of Young’s modulus and maximum and minimum magnitudes of the density of the porous core, respectively. On the other hand, for uneven porosity distributions, pores distribution is asymmetrical with respect to the intermediate-plane thus [62]:

(8a) E c ( z ) = E 0 [ 1 p cos ( { ( 0.5 π / h c ) ( z + 0.5 h c ) } ) ] ,

(8b) { ρ c ( z ) , α c ( z ) , β c ( z ) } = { ρ 0 , α 0 , β 0 } [ 1 p m cos ( { ( 0.5 π / h c ) ( z + 0.5 h c ) } ) ]

At the end, for uniformly distributed porosity, elasticity modulus and density are thickness independent as [46]:

(9a) E c ( z ) = E 0 [ 1 p ζ ] ,

(9b) { ρ c ( z ) , α c ( z ) , β c ( z ) } = ρ 0 , α 0 , β 0 1 p m ζ

in which:

(10) ζ = [ 1 ( 2 { 1 p 1 } / π + 1 ) 2 ] / p

To determine the elastic coefficients for the FG-GNP-RC face sheets, the following relations can be represented [63]:

(11) C 11 f = C 22 f = ( 1 ν f ( z ) ) E f ( z ) / [ ( 1 + ν f ( z ) ) ( 1 2 ν f ( z ) ) ] , C 12 f = C 21 f = ν f ( z ) E f ( z ) / [ ( 1 + ν f ( z ) ) ( 1 2 ν f ( z ) ) ] , C 44 f = C 55 f = C 66 f = E f ( z ) / 2 ( 1 + ν f ( z ) )

Top and bottom physical properties are also variable through their thicknesses. To determine the effective values of these parameters for different models, Halpin–Tsai and MR micromechanical models are employed. Halpin–Tsai model uses the following relation to predict the effective Young’s modulus [64]:

(12) E f ( z ) = E M 8 3 1 + ζ L η L V GNP 1 η L V GNP + 5 1 + ζ W η W V GNP 1 η W V GNP

in which E M denotes matrix part Young’s modulus; while the volume fraction of GNPs is shown by V GNP. Furthermore, ζ L, ζ W, η L, and η W state properties of the GNPs, which is related to its geometry, and can be defined as [65]:

(13) ζ L = 2 l GNP t GNP , η W = E GNP E M 1 / E GNP E M + ζ W , ζ W = 2 w GNP t GNP , η L = E GNP E M 1 / E GNP E M + ζ L

Here, l GNP denotes the GNPs’ length, their thickness is shown by t GNP, and their width is represented by w GNP. Moreover, E GNP is Young’s modulus of GNPs reinforcements. Noteworthy, the GNPs’ volume fraction added to volume fraction of matrix portion should be 1 and that of GNPs can be obtained via the following equation [66]:

(14) V GNP = g GNP ( z ) g GNP ( z ) + ( ρ GNP / ρ M ) ( 1 g GNP ( z ) )

In the abovementioned relation, ρ is the density. The subscripts GNP and M are related to the GNPs reinforcements and matrix. Also, g GNP refers to the dispersion pattern of the reinforcement phase weight fraction and can be presented as [67]:

Parabolically dispersed GNPs through the matrix:

(15a) g GNP ( z ) = 4 h f 2 μ P W GNP z 2 ;

Linearly dispersed GNPs through the matrix

(15b) g GNP ( z ) = μ L W GNP 1 2 ± z h f ;

Uniformly dispersed GNPs through the matrix

(15c) g GNP ( z ) = μ U W GNP ;

μ P, μ L, and μ U are the GNPs’ gradient indices. The subscript P, L, and U are representatives of the words parabolic, linear, and uniform, respectively, where they are addressing different dispersion patterns of GNPs. For more information, it should be mentioned that the total GNPs content percentage plays a crucial role in GNPs dispersion pattern variations. For 0, 1/3, and 1 percentage of GNPs, the values of μ P are 0, 1, and 3, respectively. The values of μ L for 0, 1/3, and 1 percentage of GNPs are 0, 2/3, and 2, respectively. Also, for 0, 1/3, and 1 percentage of GNPs, the values of μ U are 0, 1/3, and 1, respectively [68].

Moreover, other properties of the face sheets such as their Poisson’s ratio, density, and hygrothermal expansion coefficients can be determined via the MR model as [69]:

(16) { ρ f ( z ) , ν f ( z ) , α f ( z ) , β f ( z ) } = { ρ GNP , ν GNP , α GNP , β GNP } V GNP + { ρ M , ν M , α M , β M } V M

3 Motion equations

Hamilton’s principle is used to extract the motion equations of the aforementioned sandwich shell [70]:

(17) δ t 1 t 2 K Π) d t = 0

in which Λ, K, and Π are whole strain energy, kinetic energy, and external work applied on the sandwich shell, respectively. Also, t is the time. Strain energy is due to the two face sheets and core and can be presented as:

(18) Λ = Λ c + Λ f

The FG porous core strain energy is derived as:

(19) Λ c = 1 2 x θ h c / 2 + h c / 2 [ σ i j c ε i j ] R d z d θ d x ; i , j = x , θ , z

Furthermore, the strain energy of GNP-RC face sheets has the following form [71]:

(20) Λ f = x θ ( h c / 2 ) ( h b ) h c / 2 0.5 [ σ i j f ε i j ] R d z d θ d x + x θ + h c / 2 ( + h c / 2 ) + ( h t ) 0.5 [ σ i j f ε i j ] R d z d θ d x ; i , j = x , θ , z

Therefore, the variations of the total strain energy can be presented as:

(21) δ Λ = x θ x N x x 1 R θ Q x θ δ u 0 + 1 R θ N θ θ x Q x θ δ v 0 + 2 x 2 G x x 1 R 2 2 θ 2 G θ θ + N θ θ R 1 R θ Q θ z + 1 R θ G G θ z x Q x z + x G G x z 2 R 2 x θ G x θ δ w 0 + x F x x + F F x z 1 R θ F x θ δ λ x + 1 R θ F θ θ x F x θ + F F θ z δ λ θ R d θ d x

where:

(22a) N x x θ θ F x x θ θ G x x θ θ = Q 11 12 1 f g f f 2 f g g f g g 2 + 1 R Q 12 22 1 f g 1 f f 2 f g f g g f g 2 g u 0 x λ x x 2 w 0 x 2 v 0 θ λ θ θ 2 w 0 θ 2 w 0 T ,

(22b) Q x z F F x z G G x z = Q 55 1 g f f ( 1 g ) f 2 g ( 1 g ) g f w 0 x λ x T ,

(22c) Q θ z F θ z G θ z F F θ z G G θ z = Q 44 f f 1 R g + 1 R g + 1 1 R f ( f f ) f R g + 1 R g + 1 f R g ( f f ) g R g + 1 R g + 1 g R f ( f f ) f R g + 1 R g + 1 f R g ( f f ) g R g + 1 R g + 1 g R λ θ w 0 θ v 0 T ,

(22d) Q x θ F x θ G x θ = Q 66 1 f 2 R g 1 R 1 R f f f 2 2 R f g f R 1 R f 2 g g f 2 R g 2 g R 1 R f g v 0 x λ θ x 2 w 0 x θ u 0 θ λ x θ T

Moreover, the definition of kinetic energy can be added as [35]:

(23) K = x θ h / 2 + h / 2 0.5 ρ c , f [ ( u / t ) 2 + ( v / t ) 2 + ( w / t ) 2 ] R d z d θ d x

Using the variational approach, variations of the kinetic energy can be stated as:

(24) δ K = x θ I 0 2 t 2 u 0 I 1 2 t 2 λ x δ u 0 + I 0 2 t 2 v 0 I 1 2 t 2 λ θ + 1 R I 1 3 θ t 2 w 0 δ v 0 + I 2 3 x t 2 u 0 I 4 3 x t 2 λ x + I 5 4 x 2 t 2 w 0 1 R I 1 3 θ t 2 v 0 1 R I 3 3 θ t 2 λ θ + I 3 4 θ 2 t 2 w 0 I 0 2 t 2 w 0 δ w 0 + I 1 2 t 2 u 0 I 3 2 t 2 λ x + I 4 3 x t 2 w 0 δ λ x + I 1 2 t 2 v 0 I 3 2 t 2 λ θ + I 3 R 3 θ t 2 w 0 δ λ θ R d θ d x

in which:

(25) I 0 , I 1 , I 2 , I 3 , I 4 , I 5 = h 2 h 2 ρ f , c ( 1 , f , g , f 2 , f g , g 2 ) d z

Pasternak foundation is assumed for the sandwich shells. Therefore, external work due to the Pasternak foundation can be determined by ref. [72]:

(26) Π 1 = x θ 0.5 K w w 0 2 + K g w { 2 w 0 / x 2 } + 1 R 2 K g w { 2 w 0 / θ 2 } R d θ d x

where K w is the Winkler spring coefficient and K g shows the shear layer coefficient.

The hygrothermal external work applied on the whole sandwich structure due to the hygrothermal load as a result of the temperature and moisture difference can be determined as follows [73,74]:

(27) Π 2 = x θ 0.5 N x H T ( w 0 / x ) 2 + 1 R 2 N θ H T ( w 0 / θ ) 2 R d θ d x

where hygrothermal loads in x and θ directions are shown by N x H T and N θ H T , respectively, which can be presented as [10]:

(28) N x H T = h / 2 + h / 2 ( C 11 c , f + C 12 c , f ) α i j c , f Δ T d z + h / 2 + h / 2 ( C 11 c , f + C 12 c , f ) β i j c , f Δ H d z , N θ H T = h / 2 + h / 2 ( C 12 c , f + C 22 c , f ) α i j c , f Δ T d z + h / 2 + h / 2 ( C 12 c , f + C 22 c , f ) β i j c , f Δ H d z

Finally, whole external work’s variations may be evaluated by summing the presented two works as:

(29) δ Π = δ Π 1 + δ Π 2

So:

(30) δ Π = x θ K g 2 w 0 x 2 + K g R 2 2 w 0 θ 2 K w w 0 + N x H T 2 w 0 x 2 + N θ H T R 2 2 w 0 θ 2 δ w 0 R d θ d x

By substituting equations (21), (24), and (30) into equation (17), the motion equations can be derived, setting the coefficients of δu 0, δv 0 , δw 0, δλ x , and δλ θ to zero.

4 Analytical solution procedure

To solve the obtained differential equations, Navier’s solution approach is applied. Based on this scheme, the geometrical boundary conditions for the simply supported type can be satisfied using the below functions for the displacement vectors [75]:

(31) u 0 ( x , θ , t ) = m = 1 n = 1 U cos ( α x ) sin ( β θ ) e i ω t , v 0 ( x , θ , t ) = m = 1 n = 1 V sin ( α x ) cos ( β θ ) e i ω t , w 0 ( x , θ , t ) = m = 1 n = 1 W sin ( α x ) sin ( β θ ) e i ω t , λ x ( x , θ , t ) = m = 1 n = 1 ϒ x cos ( α x ) sin ( β θ ) e i ω t , λ θ ( x , θ , t ) = m = 1 n = 1 ϒ θ sin ( α x ) cos ( β θ ) e i ω t

where U, V, W, Y x , and Y θ denote the coefficients which are unknown. Also, α = /L and β = /φ r in which wavenumbers along x and θ directions are represented by n and m, respectively, which are integers. In the end, the motion equations can be obtained in a matrix form as:

(32) ( [ K ] 5 × 5 ω 2 [ M ] 5 × 5 ) { U V W ϒ x ϒ θ } T = 0

The arrays of stiffness [K] and mass [M] matrices can be determined by substituting the functions of equation (31) into the governing motion equations which are obtained in the previous section. Solving equation (32) yields the natural frequencies of the studied structure.

5 Results and discussions

The current section is aimed to provide the results, in numerical and graphical form, to examine the vibrational behavior of the aforementioned sandwich shell under different conditions. The results will be reliable when the main code becomes validated with previous papers in this context. In this paper, the natural frequencies (in Hz) are listed for a single-layer orthotropic cylindrical shell with the following mechanical and geometrical specifications:

E x = 120 GPa , E y = 10 GPa , G x y = 5.5 GPa ,
ρ = 1 , 700 kg / m 3 , ν x = 0.27 , ν y = 0.0225 ,
R = 1 m , h = 0.01 m , L = 5 m

The cylindrical panel’s different mode numbers’ frequencies are obtained and compared with refs. [56,76] in Table 1. The results of reference papers are similar to the results acquired by the current code. Some partial errors may be in response to different displacement field utilizations, and also, different solution methods.

Table 1

Comparing the results for a simpler state with those of previously published works (Hz)

Reference (m,n)
(1,1) (2,1) (3,1) (4,1) (5,1) (6,1)
Liu et al. (2012) (Exact) 741 416 258 198 209 266
Liu et al. (2012) (S-DQFME) 741 416 258 198 209 266
Mohammadimehr et al. (2019) 741.324 415.846 256.596 194.350 203.539 259.921
Current study 741.2861 415.1433 256.7928 194.456 203.468 260.157
Error (%) 0.0385 0.2063 0.4700 1.8214 2.6467 2.2455

As another attempt to validate the results, the outcomes of this study are compared to those of Razavi et al. [27] and Ke et al. [26]. In these studies, the dimensionless natural frequency is achieved via ω R ρ ( 1 ν 2 ) / E in which L/R = 20, h/R = 0.01, and ν = 0.3.

Therefore, the validity of the proposed method is confirmed. The vibrational behavior of the current sandwich cylindrical shell in response to different variable changes will be addressed in the following.

As previously mentioned, FG porous core is made of limestone, while the faces are fabricated from the GNP-reinforced epoxy. It is noted that for the limestone, E 0 = 25 GPa, ρ 0 = 2,700 kg/m3, α 0 = 1.23 × 10−5 1/K, β 0 = 2.43 × 10−5 1/K, and ν = 0.25 [77]. Furthermore, the properties of GNPs reinforcement and the epoxy matrix are listed below [67]:

E GNP = 1.01 TPa , ρ GNP = 1062.5 kg / m 3 , ν GNP = 0.186 ,
l GNP = 2.5 μm , w GNP = 1.5 μm , t GNP = 1.5 nm ,
α GNP = 2.35 × 10 5 1 / K , β GNP = 4.35 × 10 5 1 / K ,
E M = 130 GPa , ρ M = 8 , 960 kg / m 3 , ν M = 0.34 ,
α M = 60 × 10 6 1 / K , β M = 43 × 10 6 1 / K

Also, it must be noted that all the following results, except otherwise mentioned, are obtained with a porosity coefficient of 0.2 and for uniform GNPs dispersion and even pores distribution patterns (Table 2).

Table 2

Comparing the dimensionless natural frequency for simply supported cylindrical shell with those of previously published works

Source m
1 2 3 4
Razavi et al. (2017) 0.0161 0.0116 0.0248 0.0448
Ke et al. (2014) 0.0160 0.0093 0.0221 0.0420
Current study 0.0160 0.0104 0.0235 0.0435
Error (%) 0.625 9.057 5.531 2.987

Figure 2 depicts natural frequency variations of the sandwich shell versus the porosity index. As it is evident, the higher porosity coefficients led to lower rigidity. As another expression and to provide a more physical point of view, it should be noted that higher values of porosity coefficients mean more holes and free spaces inside the core and cylindrical structures which is responsible for the lower stiffness and natural frequency, and higher flexibility. According to Figure 2, for the constant thickness of the sandwich cylindrical model, mid-radius enhancement decreased the natural frequency. Figure 3 illustrates the variation range of natural frequency versus length to thickness ratio (L/h) of the cylindrical sandwich shell. An increase in the mentioned ratio for constant total shell thickness implied an enhancement in the model length which can lead to the reduction of natural frequency and stiffness. Figure 3 also offers valuable information about the relationship of the porosity distribution patterns with the natural frequency of sandwich shell. It is clear that uniform and uneven distributions of porosity provide the lowest natural frequency and stiffness, respectively, due to pores’ placement and its impact on the stiffness of the structure. The effects of W GNP and h c/h f on natural frequency are displayed in Figure 4. At constant total thickness, an increase in the core thickness (i.e., a decline in the face sheets thickness) decremented the natural frequency and rigidity. Importantly, this reduction got steadier for higher values of porous core thickness. In another conclusion, at constant GNPs length, higher values of W GNP led to less rigid cylindrical sandwich shell structure. Moreover, Figure 5 presents the effect of different GNPs dispersion on natural frequency. Based on this figure, for similar GNPs dispersion coefficients, the parabolic dispersion of GNPs offered a stiffer structure. It means the highest natural frequency can be observed in the structures involving parabolic GNPs dispersion. Furthermore, comparing the epoxy curvature highlights the importance of GNPs presence as the reinforcing phase within the epoxy matrix. Figure 6 depicts natural frequency versus mid-radius to thickness ratio (R/h) of the shell for different temperature gradients. At the constant thickness of the sandwich cylindrical model, mid-radius enhancement decreased the natural frequency. Such effect is visible for temperature difference enhancement and natural frequency, and consequently, stiffness reduction occurred due to the higher temperatures. The physical point of view is tangible when such structure initiates to melt due to the higher values of temperature differences. Natural frequency variation against humidity difference of surroundings is plotted in Figure 7 to illustrate the decline in the natural frequency, stiffness, and stability due to the humidity difference enhancement. The effect of different levels of moisture in the environment is negligible on the natural frequency of the whole cylindrical sandwich structure, but it can cause a crucial difference in the design of sensitive devices. Figure 8 presents the natural frequency versus GNPs geometrical dimensions. At constant GNPs width, natural frequency and stability increased by increasing the GNPs’ length. Tables 3 and 4 are presented to provide a complete understanding of the effects of the mode number, pores dispersion, GNPs dispersion, and geometrical shape of the sandwich shell on natural frequency. For each condition, mode numbers of (2,2) and (1,1) led to the highest and lowest natural frequencies, respectively. Moreover, even dispersion of pores and parabolic dispersion of GNPs caused the highest magnitudes of natural frequency, stiffness, and stability for each mode. Table 3 is listed for R = 20 h and uniform GNPs dispersion pattern, while Table 4 is for uniform porosity distribution. Figure 9 investigates the influence of porous core thickness and rotation angle alternations on the cylindrical sandwich structure frequency. The whole structure thickness is kept constant and equal to 1 cm. Figure 10 shows the dependence of the natural frequency on the rotation angle of the cylindrical sandwich shell. As it is clear, the natural frequency and stability of the model deal with the rotation angle in the direct direction. As another expression, allocating lower values to the rotation angle led to lower natural frequency and instability for any radius to thickness ratio. By comparing Figures 9 and 10 what is novel in Figure 9 is the decline in the natural frequency due to the porous core thickness enhancement which resulted in stability reduction as well. Finally, in the last figure of this section, a 3-D figure is provided in Figure 11 to generate a comprehensive analysis of natural frequency variation versus foundation parameters. The stiffness and rigidity of the system decreased due to a reduction in the spring and shear layer constants.

Figure 2 
               Effect of porosity coefficient and R/h ratio on the fundamental natural frequency (h = 0.01m, h
                  c = 10h
                  f, L = 20h, φ
                  r = 2π, μ
                  U = 1).
Figure 2

Effect of porosity coefficient and R/h ratio on the fundamental natural frequency (h = 0.01m, h c = 10h f, L = 20h, φ r = 2π, μ U = 1).

Figure 3 
               Porosity distribution pattern influence on the natural frequencies of the shell versus its aspect ratio (h = 0.01m, h
                  c = 10h
                  f, L = 50h, φ
                  r = 2π, μ
                  U = 1).
Figure 3

Porosity distribution pattern influence on the natural frequencies of the shell versus its aspect ratio (h = 0.01m, h c = 10h f, L = 50h, φ r = 2π, μ U = 1).

Figure 4 
               Thickness ratio and weight fraction of GNPs’ effect on the results (h = 0.01m, R = 100h, φ
                  r = 2π, μ
                  P = 2).
Figure 4

Thickness ratio and weight fraction of GNPs’ effect on the results (h = 0.01m, R = 100h, φ r = 2π, μ P = 2).

Figure 5 
               GNPs dispersion patterns’ effect on the natural frequencies (h = 0.01m, h
                  c = 10h
                  f, R = 100h, φ
                  r = 2π).
Figure 5

GNPs dispersion patterns’ effect on the natural frequencies (h = 0.01m, h c = 10h f, R = 100h, φ r = 2π).

Figure 6 
               Temperature variations’ effect on the vibration of the shell (h = 0.01m, h
                  c = 10h
                  f, L = 20h, φ
                  r = 2π, μ
                  U = 1, W
                  GNP = 0.01).
Figure 6

Temperature variations’ effect on the vibration of the shell (h = 0.01m, h c = 10h f, L = 20h, φ r = 2π, μ U = 1, W GNP = 0.01).

Figure 7 
               Moisture changes’ influence on the structure's fundamental frequency (h = 0.01m, h
                  c = 10h
                  f, L = 20h, φ
                  r = 2π, μ
                  U = 1).
Figure 7

Moisture changes’ influence on the structure's fundamental frequency (h = 0.01m, h c = 10h f, L = 20h, φ r = 2π, μ U = 1).

Figure 8 
               Effect of GNPs Geometrical parameters versus thicknesses of the layers ratio on the frequencies (h = 0.01m, R = 100h, L = 20h, φ
                  r = 2π, μ
                  P = 2, W
                  GNP = 1.5 × 10−6).
Figure 8

Effect of GNPs Geometrical parameters versus thicknesses of the layers ratio on the frequencies (h = 0.01m, R = 100h, L = 20h, φ r = 2π, μ P = 2, W GNP = 1.5 × 10−6).

Table 3

Effect of pores’ distribution pattern on the natural frequencies of the cylindrical shell for different wavenumbers

L/h Porosity distribution pattern (m,n)
(1,1) (2,1) (1,2) (2,2) (3,1) (3,2) (2,3) (3,3)
10 Even 10.7268 10.9181 32.8658 33.1417 11.2085 33.5922 69.0011 69.4458
Uneven 10.6144 10.7972 32.3807 32.6515 11.0746 33.0934 68.0454 68.4837
Uniform 10.5919 10.7769 32.2801 32.5508 11.0576 32.9928 67.8365 68.2739
20 Even 6.9448 6.7601 10.7268 10.9181 6.3286 11.2085 19.9564 20.3801
Uneven 6.9299 6.7376 10.6144 10.7972 6.2952 11.0746 19.6693 20.0826
Uniform 6.9299 6.7353 10.5919 10.7769 6.2991 11.0576 19.6136 20.0281
Table 4

Effect of GNPs dispersion pattern on the frequencies of the cylindrical shell for various wavenumbers

L/h GNPs dispersion pattern (m,n)
(1,1) (2,1) (1,2) (2,2) (3,1) (3,2) (2,3) (3,3)
10 Linear 11.5614 11.7791 35.9435 36.2448 12.1102 36.7365 75.2780 75.7588
Parabolic 12.1246 12.3609 38.0393 38.3579 12.7207 38.8779 79.5004 80.0055
Uniform 10.5919 10.7769 32.2801 32.5508 11.0576 32.9928 67.8365 68.2739
Pure epoxy 9.3955 9.5379 27.5754 27.8062 9.7526 28.1831 58.1528 58.5329
20 Linear 7.2833 7.1048 11.5614 11.7791 6.6745 12.1102 21.7847 22.2513
Parabolic 7.4928 7.3198 12.1246 12.3609 6.8929 12.7207 23.0332 23.5295
Uniform 6.9230 6.7353 10.5919 10.7769 6.2991 11.0576 19.6136 20.0281
Pure epoxy 6.4981 6.2979 9.3955 9.5379 6.0736 10.3616 18.1627 18.5484
Figure 9 
               Rotation angle variations’ effect on the fundamental natural frequency (R = 100h, L = 20h, φ
                  r = 2π, and μ
                  P = 2).
Figure 9

Rotation angle variations’ effect on the fundamental natural frequency (R = 100h, L = 20h, φ r = 2π, and μ P = 2).

Figure 10 
               Influence of mid-radius to thickness and rotation angle on the shell’s natural frequencies (h = 0.01m, h
                  c = 10h
                  f, L = 20h, and μ
                  U = 1).
Figure 10

Influence of mid-radius to thickness and rotation angle on the shell’s natural frequencies (h = 0.01m, h c = 10h f, L = 20h, and μ U = 1).

Figure 11 
               Pasternak foundation parameters’ effect on the vibration of the cylindrical shell (h = 0.01m, h
                  c = 10h, R = 100h, L = 20h, φ
                  r = 2π, and μ
                  P = 2).
Figure 11

Pasternak foundation parameters’ effect on the vibration of the cylindrical shell (h = 0.01m, h c = 10h, R = 100h, L = 20h, φ r = 2π, and μ P = 2).

6 Conclusion

SSDST, Navier’s methods, and Hamilton’s principle are used to derive and solve the governing equations of motion to assess the vibrational responses of a cylindrical sandwich shell including FG porous core and two FG-GNPRC face sheets. Different figures and tables are presented to address the physical properties such as stiffness, flexibility, and rigidity. It is observed that an enhancement in the GNPs’ length and a decline in the porosity coefficient, humidity, and temperature differences can increment the natural frequency. The lowest natural frequency is observed in non-reinforced samples. At the constant shell thickness, lower natural frequencies, and consequently, stability are observed in higher shell radii. On the other hand, the rotation angle of the shell has a direct relationship with stiffness. These changes in the stiffness get intensified at the lower values of the shell radius and rotation angle of the shell. Based on these results, this paper tried to use the proposed cylindrical sandwich shell as a model for developing lighter and stiffer structures to use in the corresponding industries.

  1. Funding information: This research is financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2019YFE0112400; 2018YFC1504303; 2017YFC0703603; 2017YFC1503103), National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52078310, 51878420), and the Key Research and Development Program of Liaoning Province (Grant No. 2017231010), the Taishan Scholar Priority Discipline Talent Group program funded by the Shan Dong Province, and the first-class discipline project funded by the Education Department of Shandong Province.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

Appendix

The arrays of stiffness and mass matrices in equation (32) are defined as:

K 11 = Q 110 α 2 + Q 660 β 2 R 2 ,

K 12 = 1 R ( Q 120 α β + Q 660 α β ) ,

K 13 = Q 112 α 3 Q 122 α β 2 R 2 Q 120 α R 2 Q 662 α β 2 R 2 ,

K 14 = Q 111 α 2 + Q 661 β 2 R 2 ,

K 15 = Q 121 α β R + Q 661 α β R ,

K 21 = Q 120 α β R + Q 660 α β R ,

K 22 = Q 220 β 2 R 2 + Q 660 α 2 ,

K 23 = Q 122 α 2 β R Q 222 β 3 R 3 Q 220 β R 2 2 Q 662 α 2 β R ,

K 24 = Q 121 α β R + Q 661 α β R ,

K 25 = Q 221 β 2 R 2 + Q 661 α 2 ,

K 31 = Q 112 α 3 Q 122 α β 2 R 2 Q 120 α R 2 Q 662 α β 2 R 2 ,

K 32 = Q 122 α 2 β R Q 222 β 3 R 3 Q 220 β R 2 2 Q 662 α 2 β R ,

K 33 = 2 Q 122 α 2 R + 4 Q 665 α 2 β 2 R 2 + 2 Q 125 α 2 β 2 R 2 + Q 220 R 2 + Q 115 α 4 + Q 550 α 2 2 Q 559 α 2 + Q 5511 α 2 + Q 225 β 4 R 4 + 2 Q 222 β 2 R 3 + Q 440 β 2 R 2 2 Q 449 β 2 R 2 + Q 4411 β 2 R 2 + K g α 2 + 1 R 2 K g β 2 + K w + 1 R 2 N θ H T β 2 + N x H T α 2 ,

K 34 = 2 Q 664 α β 2 R 2 Q 124 α β 2 R 2 Q 114 α 3 + Q 556 α Q 5510 α Q 121 α R ,

K 35 = Q 124 α 2 β R 2 Q 664 α 2 β R Q 224 β 3 R 3 Q 221 β R 2 + Q 446 β R Q 4410 β R ,

K 41 = Q 111 α 2 + Q 661 β 2 R 2 ,

K 42 = Q 121 α β R + Q 661 α β R ,

K 43 = 2 Q 664 α β 2 R 2 Q 124 α β 2 R 2 Q 114 α 3 + Q 556 α Q 5510 α Q 121 α R ,

K 44 = 2 Q 664 α β 2 R 2 Q 124 α β 2 R 2 Q 114 α 3 + Q 556 α Q 5510 α Q 121 α R ,

K 45 = Q 123 α β R + Q 663 α β R ,

K 51 = Q 121 α β R + Q 661 α β R ,

K 52 = Q 221 β 2 R 2 + Q 661 α 2 ,

K 53 = 1 R Q 124 α 2 β 2 Q 664 α 2 β Q 224 β 3 R 2 Q 221 β R + Q 446 β Q 4410 β ,

K 54 = Q 123 α β R + Q 663 α β R ,

K 55 = Q 223 β 2 R 2 + Q 663 α 2 + Q 448 ,

M 11 = I 0 , M 12 = 0 , M 13 = 0 , M 14 = I 1 , M 15 = 0 , M 21 = 0 , M 22 = I 0 , M 23 = I 1 β / R , M 24 = I 1 , M 25 = 0 , M 31 = I 2 α , M 32 = I 1 β / R , M 33 = I 5 α 2 + I 3 β 2 + I 0 , M 34 = I 4 α , M 35 = I 3 β / R ,

M 41 = I 1 , M 42 = 0 , M 43 = I 4 α , M 44 = I 3 , M 45 = 0 , M 51 = 0 , M 52 = I 1 , M 53 = I 3 β / R , M 54 = 0 , M 55 = I 3

in which:

Q 110 , Q 111 , Q 112 , Q 113 , Q 114 , Q 115 = h 2 h 2 C 11 ( z ) ( 1 , f ( z ) , g ( z ) , f ( z ) 2 , f ( z ) g ( z ) , g ( z ) 2 ) d z

Q 120 , Q 121 , Q 122 , Q 123 , Q 124 = h 2 h 2 C 12 ( z ) ( 1 , f ( z ) , g ( z ) , f ( z ) 2 , f ( z ) g ( z ) ) d z

Q 220 , Q 221 , Q 223 = h 2 h 2 C 22 ( z ) ( 1 , f ( z ) , f ( z ) 2 ) d z

Q 440 , Q 441 , Q 443 , Q 446 , Q 447 , Q 448 = h 2 h 2 C 44 ( z ) ( 1 , f ( z ) , f ( z ) 2 , f ( z ) , f ( z ) f ( z ) , f ( z ) 2 ) d z

Q 550 , Q 556 , Q 558 , Q 559 , Q 5510 , Q 5511 = h 2 h 2 C 55 ( z ) ( 1 , f ( z ) , f ( z ) 2 , g ( z ) , f ( z ) g ( z ) , g ( z ) 2 ) d z

Q 660 , Q 661 , Q 662 , Q 663 , Q 664 , Q 665 = h 2 h 2 C 66 ( z ) ( 1 , f ( z ) , g ( z ) , f ( z ) 2 , f ( z ) g ( z ) , g ( z ) 2 ) d z

References

[1] Behdinan K, Moradi-Dastjerdi R, Safaei B, Qin Z, Chu F, Hui D. Graphene and CNT impact on heat transfer response of nanocomposite cylinders. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9:41–52. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-0004.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Huang Y, Zeng J. Recent development and applications of nanomaterials for cancer immunotherapy. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9:382–99. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-0027.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Wu Q, Miao WS, Zhang YD, Gao HJ, Hui D. Mechanical properties of nanomaterials: a review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9:259–73. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-0021.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Yan Y, Nashath FZ, Chen S, Manickam S, Lim SS, Zhao H, et al. Synthesis of graphene: potential carbon precursors and approaches. Nanotechnol Rev. 2020;9:1284–314. 10.1515/ntrev-2020-0100.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Catania G, Strozzi M. Damping oriented design of thin-walled mechanical components by means of multi-layer coating technology. Coatings. 2018;8:73. 10.3390/coatings8020073.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Rongong JA, Goruppa AA, Buravalla VR, Tomlinson GR, Jones FR. Plasma deposition of constrained layer damping coatings. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2004;218:669–80. 10.1243/0954406041319581.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Yu L, Ma Y, Zhou C, Xu H. Damping efficiency of the coating structure. Int J Solids Struct. 2005;42:3045–58. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.10.033.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Amir S, Arshid E, Khoddami Maraghi Z, Loghman A, Ghorbanpour Arani A. Vibration analysis of magnetorheological fluid circular sandwich plates with magnetostrictive facesheets exposed to monotonic magnetic field located on visco-Pasternak substrate. J Vib Control. 2020;26:1523–37. 10.1177/1077546319899203.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Amir S, Arshid E, Khoddami Maraghi Z. Free vibration analysis of magneto-rheological smart annular three-layered plates subjected to magnetic field in viscoelastic medium. Smart Struct Syst. 2020;25:581–92. 10.12989/sss.2020.25.5.581.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Arshid E, Kiani A, Amir S. Magneto-electro-elastic vibration of moderately thick FG annular plates subjected to multi physical loads in thermal environment using GDQ method by considering neutral surface. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl. 2019;233:2140–59. 10.1177/1464420719832626.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Arshid E, Kiani A, Amir S, Zarghami Dehaghani M. Asymmetric free vibration analysis of first-order shear deformable functionally graded magneto-electro-thermo-elastic circular plates. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2019;233:5659–75. 10.1177/0954406219850598.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Koizumi M. FGM activities in Japan. Compos Part B Eng. 1997;28:1–4. 10.1016/s1359-8368(96)00016-9.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Liu GR, Han X, Lam KY. Integration technique for evaluating confluent hypergeometric functions and its application to functionally graded materials. Comput Struct. 2001;79:1039–47. 10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00197-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Han X, Liu GR, Lam KY. Transient waves in plates of functionally graded materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2001;52:851–65. 10.1002/nme.237.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Najafizadeh MM, Eslami MR. Buckling analysis of circular plates of functionally graded materials under uniform radial compression. Int J Mech Sci. 2002;44:2479–93. 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00186-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Arshid E, Khorshidvand AR. Free vibration analysis of saturated porous FG circular plates integrated with piezoelectric actuators via differential quadrature method. Thin-Walled Struct. 2018;125:220–33. 10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.007.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Huang KH, Dasgupta A. A layer-wise analysis for free vibration of thick composite cylindrical shells. J Sound Vib. 1995;186:207–22. 10.1006/jsvi.1995.0444.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Mahmoud Mousavi S, Aghdam MM. Static bending analysis of laminated cylindrical panels with various boundary conditions using the differential cubature method. J Mech Mater Struct. 2009;4:509–21. 10.2140/jomms.2009.4.509.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Pydah A, Batra RC. Analytical solution for cylindrical bending of two-layered corrugated and webcore sandwich panels. Thin-Walled Struct. 2018;123:509–19. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.11.023.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Sun G, Wang E, Zhang J, Li S, Zhang Y, Li Q. Experimental study on the dynamic responses of foam sandwich panels with different facesheets and core gradients subjected to blast impulse. Int J Impact Eng. 2020;135:103327. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103327.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Arshid E, Arshid H, Amir S, Mousavi SB. Free vibration and buckling analyses of FG porous sandwich curved microbeams in thermal environment under magnetic field based on modified couple stress theory. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2021;21:6. 10.1007/s43452-020-00150-x.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Barati MR, Sadr MH, Zenkour AM. Buckling analysis of higher order graded smart piezoelectric plates with porosities resting on elastic foundation. Int J Mech Sci. 2016;117:309–20. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.09.012.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Arshid E, Amir S, Loghman A. Thermal buckling analysis of FG graphene nanoplatelets reinforced porous nanocomposite MCST-based annular/circular microplates. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2021;106561. 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106561.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Salmani R, Gholami R, Ansari R, Fakhraie M. Analytical investigation on the nonlinear postbuckling of functionally graded porous cylindrical shells reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Eur Phys J Plus. 2021;136:1–19. 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-01009-z.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Trabelsi S, Frikha A, Zghal S, Dammak F. A modified FSDT-based four nodes finite shell element for thermal buckling analysis of functionally graded plates and cylindrical shells. Eng Struct. 2019;178:444–59. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.047.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Ke LL, Wang YS, Reddy JN. Thermo-electro-mechanical vibration of size-dependent piezoelectric cylindrical nanoshells under various boundary conditions. Compos Struct. 2014;116:626–36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.048.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Razavi H, Babadi AF, Tadi Beni Y. Free vibration analysis of functionally graded piezoelectric cylindrical nanoshell based on consistent couple stress theory. Compos Struct. 2017;160:1299–309. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.056.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Khoa ND, Anh VM, Duc ND. Nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of functionally graded nanocomposite cylindrical panel reinforced by carbon nanotubes in thermal environment. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2019;1–32. 10.1177/1099636219847191.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Visconti P, Primiceri P, De Fazio R, Strafella L, Ficarella A, Carlucci AP. Light-Induced ignition of Carbon Nanotubes and energetic nano-materials: a review on methods and advanced technical solutions for nanoparticles-enriched fuels combustion. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2020;59:26–46. 10.1515/rams-2020-0010.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Ahmad SI, Hamoudi H, Abdala A, Ghouri ZK, Youssef KM. Graphene-reinforced bulk metal matrix composites: synthesis, microstructure, and properties. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2020;59:67–114. 10.1515/rams-2020-0007.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Sun Y, Sun Y, Peng Y, Zhou T, Liu H, Gao P. Study of the mechanical-electrical-magnetic properties and the microstructure of three-layered cement-based absorbing boards. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2020;59:160–9. 10.1515/rams-2020-0014.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Hashim H, Salleh MS, Omar MZ. Homogenous dispersion and interfacial bonding of carbon nanotube reinforced with aluminum matrix composite: a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2019;58:295–303. 10.1515/rams-2019-0035.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Arshid E, Khorasani M, Soleimani-Javid Z, Amir S, Tounsi A. Porosity-dependent vibration analysis of FG microplates embedded by polymeric nanocomposite patches considering hygrothermal effect via an innovative plate theory. Eng Comput. 2021;1–22. 10.1007/s00366-021-01382-y.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Fattahi AM, Safaei B, Ahmed NA. A comparison for the non-classical plate model based on axial buckling of single-layered graphene sheets. Eur Phys J Plus. 2019;134:1–13. 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12912-7.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Fattahi AM, Safaei B, Moaddab E. The application of nonlocal elasticity to determine vibrational behavior of FG nanoplates. Steel Compos Struct. 2019;32:281–92. 10.12989/scs.2019.32.2.281.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Mohseni A, Shakouri M. Natural frequency, damping and forced responses of sandwich plates with viscoelastic core and graphene nanoplatelets reinforced face sheets. Journal Vib Control. 2020;26:1165–77. 10.1177/1077546319893453.Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Yaghoobi H, Taheri F. Analytical solution and statistical analysis of buckling capacity of sandwich plates with uniform and non-uniform porous core reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Struct. 2020;252:112700. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112700.Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Kumar P, Srinivasa CV. On buckling and free vibration studies of sandwich plates and cylindrical shells: a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2020;33:673–724. 10.1177/0892705718809810.Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Ibrahim HH, Tawfik M, Al-Ajmi M. Thermal buckling and nonlinear flutter behavior of functionally graded material panels. J Aircr. 2007;44:1610–8. 10.2514/1.27866.Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Mehar K, Panda SK. Thermal free vibration behavior of FG-CNT reinforced sandwich curved panel using finite element method. Polym Compos. 2017. 10.1002/pc.Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Karimiasl M, Ebrahimi F, Mahesh V. Nonlinear forced vibration of smart multiscale sandwich composite doubly curved porous shell. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;143:106152. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.044.Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Ramezani H, Mirzaei M. Transient elastodynamic behavior of cylindrical tubes under moving pressures and different boundary conditions. Appl Math Model. 2020;77:934–49. 10.1016/j.apm.2019.08.011.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Hebali H, Tounsi A, Houari MSA, Bessaim A, Bedia EAA. New Quasi-3D hyperbolic shear deformation theory for the static and free vibration analysis of functionally graded plates. J Eng Mech. 2014;140:374–83. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000665.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Mirjavadi SS, Forsat M, Barati MR, Hamouda AMS. Investigating nonlinear forced vibration behavior of multi-phase nanocomposite annular sector plates using Jacobi elliptic functions. Steel Compos Struct. 2020;36:87–101. 10.12989/scs.2020.36.1.087.Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Mirjavadi SS, Forsat M, Barati MR, Hamouda AMS. Nonlinear forced vibrations of multi-scale epoxy/CNT/fiberglass truncated conical shells and annular plates via 3D Mori-Tanaka scheme. Steel Compos Struct. 2020;35:765–77. 10.12989/scs.2020.35.6.765.Suche in Google Scholar

[46] Safaei B. The effect of embedding a porous core on the free vibration behavior of laminated composite plates. Steel Compos Struct. 2020;35:659–70.Suche in Google Scholar

[47] Sahmani S, Fattahi AM, Ahmed NA. Analytical mathematical solution for vibrational response of postbuckled laminated FG-GPLRC nonlocal strain gradient micro-/nanobeams. Eng Comput. 2019;35:1173–89. 10.1007/s00366-018-0657-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Sahmani S, Aghdam MM. Axial postbuckling analysis of multilayer functionally graded composite nanoplates reinforced with GPLs based on nonlocal strain gradient theory. Eur Phys J Plus. 2017;132:1–17. 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11773-4.Suche in Google Scholar

[49] Arshid E, Amir S. Size-dependent vibration analysis of fluid-infiltrated porous curved microbeams integrated with reinforced functionally graded graphene platelets face sheets considering thickness stretching effect. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl. 2021;235(5):146442072098555. 10.1177/1464420720985556.Suche in Google Scholar

[50] Fan F, Xu Y, Sahmani S, Safaei B. Modified couple stress-based geometrically nonlinear oscillations of porous functionally graded microplates using NURBS-based isogeometric approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020;372:113400. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113400.Suche in Google Scholar

[51] Wang YQ, Ye C, Zu JW. Nonlinear vibration of metal foam cylindrical shells reinforced with graphene platelets. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2019;85:359–70. 10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.022.Suche in Google Scholar

[52] Qin Z, Pang X, Safaei B, Chu F. Free vibration analysis of rotating functionally graded CNT reinforced composite cylindrical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions. Compos Struct. 2019;220:847–60. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.046.Suche in Google Scholar

[53] Qin Z, Chu F, Zu J. Free vibrations of cylindrical shells with arbitrary boundary conditions: a comparison study. Int J Mech Sci. 2017;133:91–9. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.012.Suche in Google Scholar

[54] Shen HS, Xiang Y, Fan Y. Nonlinear vibration of functionally graded graphene-reinforced composite laminated cylindrical shells in thermal environments. Compos Struct. 2017;182:447–56. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.010.Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Amir S, Arshid E, Rasti-Alhosseini SMA, Loghman A. Quasi-3D tangential shear deformation theory for size-dependent free vibration analysis of three-layered FG porous micro rectangular plate integrated by nano-composite faces in hygrothermal environment. J Therm Stress. 2020;43:133–56. 10.1080/01495739.2019.1660601.Suche in Google Scholar

[56] Mohammadimehr M, Arshid E, Alhosseini SMAR, Amir S, Arani MRG. Free vibration analysis of thick cylindrical MEE composite shells reinforced CNTs with temperature-dependent properties resting on viscoelastic foundation. Struct Eng Mech. 2019;70:683–702. 10.12989/sem.2019.70.6.683.Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Sahmani S, Aghdam MM, Bahrami M. Size-dependent axial buckling and postbuckling characteristics of cylindrical nanoshells in different temperatures. Int J Mech Sci. 2016;107:170–9. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.014.Suche in Google Scholar

[58] Sahmani S, Safaei B. Large-amplitude oscillations of composite conical nanoshells with in-plane heterogeneity including surface stress effect. Appl Math Model. 2021;89:1792–813. 10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.039.Suche in Google Scholar

[59] Khorasani M, Eyvazian A, Karbon M, Tounsi A, Lampani L, Sebaey TA. Magneto-electro-elastic vibration analysis of modified couple stress-based three-layered micro rectangular plates exposed to multi-physical fields considering the flexoelectricity effects. Smart Struct Syst. 2020;26:331–43. 10.12989/sss.2020.26.3.331.Suche in Google Scholar

[60] Amir S, Arshid E, Ghorbanpour Arani MR. Size-dependent magneto-electro-elastic vibration analysis of FG saturated porous annular/circular micro sandwich plates embedded with nano-composite face sheets subjected to multi-physical pre loads. Smart Struct Syst. 2019;23:429–47. 10.12989/sss.2019.23.5.429.Suche in Google Scholar

[61] Amir S, Soleimani-Javid Z, Arshid E. Size-dependent free vibration of sandwich micro beam with porous core subjected to thermal load based on SSDBT. Zeitschrift Fur Angew Math Und Mech. 2019;99:1–21. 10.1002/zamm.201800334.Suche in Google Scholar

[62] Moradi-Dastjerdi R, Behdinan K, Safaei B, Qin Z. Buckling behavior of porous CNT-reinforced plates integrated between active piezoelectric layers. Eng Struct. 2020;222:222. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111141.Suche in Google Scholar

[63] Moradi-Dastjerdi R, Behdinan K, Safaei B, Qin Z. Static performance of agglomerated CNT-reinforced porous plates bonded with piezoceramic faces. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;188:105966. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105966.Suche in Google Scholar

[64] Arshid E, Amir S, Loghman A. Static and dynamic analyses of FG-GNPs reinforced porous nanocomposite annular micro-plates based on MSGT. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;180:105656. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105656.Suche in Google Scholar

[65] Safaei B, Khoda FH, Fattahi AM. Non-classical plate model for single-layered graphene sheet for axial buckling. Adv Nano Res. 2019;7:265–75. 10.12989/anr.2019.7.4.265.Suche in Google Scholar

[66] Khorasani M, Soleimani-Javid Z, Arshid E, Lampani L, Civalek Ö. Thermo-elastic buckling of honeycomb micro plates integrated with FG-GNPs reinforced epoxy skins with stretching effect. Compos Struct. 2020;258:113430. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113430.Suche in Google Scholar

[67] Arefi M, Mohammad-Rezaei Bidgoli E, Rabczuk T. Thermo-mechanical buckling behavior of FG GNP reinforced micro plate based on MSGT. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;142:444–59. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.04.054.Suche in Google Scholar

[68] Arshid H, Khorasani M, Soleimani-Javid Z, Dimitri R, Tornabene F. Quasi-3D hyperbolic shear deformation theory for the free vibration study of honeycomb microplates with graphene nanoplatelets-reinforced epoxy skins. Molecules. 2020;25:5085. 10.3390/molecules25215085.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[69] Thai CH, Ferreira AJM, Tran TD, Phung-Van P. A size-dependent quasi-3D isogeometric model for functionally graded graphene platelet-reinforced composite microplates based on the modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct. 2020;234:111695. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111695.Suche in Google Scholar

[70] Amir S, Khorasani M, BabaAkbar-Zarei H. Buckling analysis of nanocomposite sandwich plates with piezoelectric face sheets based on flexoelectricity and first-order shear deformation theory. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2018;22(7):109963621879538. 10.1177/1099636218795385.Suche in Google Scholar

[71] Jouneghani FZ, Babamoradi H, Dimitri R, Tornabene F. A modified couple stress elasticity for non-uniform composite laminated beams based on the Ritz formulation. Molecules. 2020;25:1404. 10.3390/molecules25061404.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[72] Kiani Y, Eslami MR. Thermal buckling and post-buckling response of imperfect temperature-dependent sandwich FGM plates resting on elastic foundation. Arch Appl Mech. 2012;82:891–905. 10.1007/s00419-011-0599-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[73] Shen HS. Thermal buckling and postbuckling behavior of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical shells. Compos Part B Eng. 2012;43:1030–8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.10.004.Suche in Google Scholar

[74] Arshid E, Amir S, Loghman A. Bending and buckling behaviors of heterogeneous temperature-dependent micro annular/circular porous sandwich plates integrated by FGPEM nano-Composite layers. J Sandw Struct Mater. 2020;109963622095502. 10.1177/1099636220955027.Suche in Google Scholar

[75] Amir S, BabaAkbar-Zarei H, Khorasani M. Flexoelectric vibration analysis of nanocomposite sandwich plates. Mech Based Des Struct Mach. 2020;48:146–63. 10.1080/15397734.2019.1624175.Suche in Google Scholar

[76] Liu B, Xing YF, Qatu MS, Ferreira AJM. Exact characteristic equations for free vibrations of thin orthotropic circular cylindrical shells. Compos Struct. 2012;94:484–93.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.012Suche in Google Scholar

[77] Detournay E, Cheng AH-D. Fundamentals of poroelasticity. Anal Des Methods. 1993;2:113–71. 10.1016/B978-0-08-040615-2.50011-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-28
Revised: 2021-04-20
Accepted: 2021-04-22
Published Online: 2021-06-03

© 2021 Chunwei Zhang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Improved impedance matching by multi-componential metal-hybridized rGO toward high performance of microwave absorption
  3. Pure-silk fibroin hydrogel with stable aligned micropattern toward peripheral nerve regeneration
  4. Effective ion pathways and 3D conductive carbon networks in bentonite host enable stable and high-rate lithium–sulfur batteries
  5. Fabrication and characterization of 3D-printed gellan gum/starch composite scaffold for Schwann cells growth
  6. Synergistic strengthening mechanism of copper matrix composite reinforced with nano-Al2O3 particles and micro-SiC whiskers
  7. Deformation mechanisms and plasticity of ultrafine-grained Al under complex stress state revealed by digital image correlation technique
  8. On the deformation-induced grain rotations in gradient nano-grained copper based on molecular dynamics simulations
  9. Removal of sulfate from aqueous solution using Mg–Al nano-layered double hydroxides synthesized under different dual solvent systems
  10. Microwave-assisted sol–gel synthesis of TiO2-mixed metal oxide nanocatalyst for degradation of organic pollutant
  11. Electrophoretic deposition of graphene on basalt fiber for composite applications
  12. Polyphenylene sulfide-coated wrench composites by nanopinning effect
  13. Thermal conductivity and thermoelectric properties in 3D macroscopic pure carbon nanotube materials
  14. An effective thermal conductivity and thermomechanical homogenization scheme for a multiscale Nb3Sn filaments
  15. Friction stir spot welding of AA5052 with additional carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite interlayer
  16. Improvement of long-term cycling performance of high-nickel cathode materials by ZnO coating
  17. Quantum effects of gas flow in nanochannels
  18. An approach to effectively improve the interfacial bonding of nano-perfused composites by in situ growth of CNTs
  19. Effects of nano-modified polymer cement-based materials on the bending behavior of repaired concrete beams
  20. Effects of the combined usage of nanomaterials and steel fibres on the workability, compressive strength, and microstructure of ultra-high performance concrete
  21. One-pot solvothermal synthesis and characterization of highly stable nickel nanoparticles
  22. Comparative study on mechanisms for improving mechanical properties and microstructure of cement paste modified by different types of nanomaterials
  23. Effect of in situ graphene-doped nano-CeO2 on microstructure and electrical contact properties of Cu30Cr10W contacts
  24. The experimental study of CFRP interlayer of dissimilar joint AA7075-T651/Ti-6Al-4V alloys by friction stir spot welding on mechanical and microstructural properties
  25. Vibration analysis of a sandwich cylindrical shell in hygrothermal environment
  26. Water barrier and mechanical properties of sugar palm crystalline nanocellulose reinforced thermoplastic sugar palm starch (TPS)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) blend bionanocomposites
  27. Strong quadratic acousto-optic coupling in 1D multilayer phoxonic crystal cavity
  28. Three-dimensional shape analysis of peripapillary retinal pigment epithelium-basement membrane layer based on OCT radial images
  29. Solvent regulation synthesis of single-component white emission carbon quantum dots for white light-emitting diodes
  30. Xanthate-modified nanoTiO2 as a novel vulcanization accelerator enhancing mechanical and antibacterial properties of natural rubber
  31. Effect of steel fiber on impact resistance and durability of concrete containing nano-SiO2
  32. Ultrasound-enhanced biosynthesis of uniform ZnO nanorice using Swietenia macrophylla seed extract and its in vitro anticancer activity
  33. Temperature dependence of hardness prediction for high-temperature structural ceramics and their composites
  34. Study on the frequency of acoustic emission signal during crystal growth of salicylic acid
  35. Controllable modification of helical carbon nanotubes for high-performance microwave absorption
  36. Role of dry ozonization of basalt fibers on interfacial properties and fracture toughness of epoxy matrix composites
  37. Nanosystem’s density functional theory study of the chlorine adsorption on the Fe(100) surface
  38. A rapid nanobiosensing platform based on herceptin-conjugated graphene for ultrasensitive detection of circulating tumor cells in early breast cancer
  39. Improving flexural strength of UHPC with sustainably synthesized graphene oxide
  40. The role of graphene/graphene oxide in cement hydration
  41. Structural characterization of microcrystalline and nanocrystalline cellulose from Ananas comosus L. leaves: Cytocompatibility and molecular docking studies
  42. Evaluation of the nanostructure of calcium silicate hydrate based on atomic force microscopy-infrared spectroscopy experiments
  43. Combined effects of nano-silica and silica fume on the mechanical behavior of recycled aggregate concrete
  44. Safety study of malapposition of the bio-corrodible nitrided iron stent in vivo
  45. Triethanolamine interface modification of crystallized ZnO nanospheres enabling fast photocatalytic hazard-free treatment of Cr(vi) ions
  46. Novel electrodes for precise and accurate droplet dispensing and splitting in digital microfluidics
  47. Construction of Chi(Zn/BMP2)/HA composite coating on AZ31B magnesium alloy surface to improve the corrosion resistance and biocompatibility
  48. Experimental and multiscale numerical investigations on low-velocity impact responses of syntactic foam composites reinforced with modified MWCNTs
  49. Comprehensive performance analysis and optimal design of smart light pole for cooperative vehicle infrastructure system
  50. Room temperature growth of ZnO with highly active exposed facets for photocatalytic application
  51. Influences of poling temperature and elongation ratio on PVDF-HFP piezoelectric films
  52. Large strain hardening of magnesium containing in situ nanoparticles
  53. Super stable water-based magnetic fluid as a dual-mode contrast agent
  54. Photocatalytic activity of biogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles: In vitro antimicrobial, biocompatibility, and molecular docking studies
  55. Hygrothermal environment effect on the critical buckling load of FGP microbeams with initial curvature integrated by CNT-reinforced skins considering the influence of thickness stretching
  56. Thermal aging behavior characteristics of asphalt binder modified by nano-stabilizer based on DSR and AFM
  57. Building effective core/shell polymer nanoparticles for epoxy composite toughening based on Hansen solubility parameters
  58. Structural characterization and nanoscale strain field analysis of α/β interface layer of a near α titanium alloy
  59. Optimization of thermal and hydrophobic properties of GO-doped epoxy nanocomposite coatings
  60. The properties of nano-CaCO3/nano-ZnO/SBR composite-modified asphalt
  61. Three-dimensional metallic carbon allotropes with superhardness
  62. Physical stability and rheological behavior of Pickering emulsions stabilized by protein–polysaccharide hybrid nanoconjugates
  63. Optimization of volume fraction and microstructure evolution during thermal deformation of nano-SiCp/Al–7Si composites
  64. Phase analysis and corrosion behavior of brazing Cu/Al dissimilar metal joint with BAl88Si filler metal
  65. High-efficiency nano polishing of steel materials
  66. On the rheological properties of multi-walled carbon nano-polyvinylpyrrolidone/silicon-based shear thickening fluid
  67. Fabrication of Ag/ZnO hollow nanospheres and cubic TiO2/ZnO heterojunction photocatalysts for RhB degradation
  68. Fabrication and properties of PLA/nano-HA composite scaffolds with balanced mechanical properties and biological functions for bone tissue engineering application
  69. Investigation of the early-age performance and microstructure of nano-C–S–H blended cement-based materials
  70. Reduced graphene oxide coating on basalt fabric using electrophoretic deposition and its role in the mechanical and tribological performance of epoxy/basalt fiber composites
  71. Effect of nano-silica as cementitious materials-reducing admixtures on the workability, mechanical properties and durability of concrete
  72. Machine-learning-assisted microstructure–property linkages of carbon nanotube-reinforced aluminum matrix nanocomposites produced by laser powder bed fusion
  73. Physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of highly porous polylactic acid/cellulose nanofibre scaffolds prepared by salt leaching technique
  74. A comparative study on characterizations and synthesis of pure lead sulfide (PbS) and Ag-doped PbS for photovoltaic applications
  75. Clean preparation of washable antibacterial polyester fibers by high temperature and high pressure hydrothermal self-assembly
  76. Al 5251-based hybrid nanocomposite by FSP reinforced with graphene nanoplates and boron nitride nanoparticles: Microstructure, wear, and mechanical characterization
  77. Interlaminar fracture toughness properties of hybrid glass fiber-reinforced composite interlayered with carbon nanotube using electrospray deposition
  78. Microstructure and life prediction model of steel slag concrete under freezing-thawing environment
  79. Synthesis of biogenic silver nanoparticles from the seed coat waste of pistachio (Pistacia vera) and their effect on the growth of eggplant
  80. Study on adaptability of rheological index of nano-PUA-modified asphalt based on geometric parameters of parallel plate
  81. Preparation and adsorption properties of nano-graphene oxide/tourmaline composites
  82. A study on interfacial behaviors of epoxy/graphene oxide derived from pitch-based graphite fibers
  83. Multiresponsive carboxylated graphene oxide-grafted aptamer as a multifunctional nanocarrier for targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics and bioactive compounds in cancer therapy
  84. Piezoresistive/piezoelectric intrinsic sensing properties of carbon nanotube cement-based smart composite and its electromechanical sensing mechanisms: A review
  85. Smart stimuli-responsive biofunctionalized niosomal nanocarriers for programmed release of bioactive compounds into cancer cells in vitro and in vivo
  86. Photoremediation of methylene blue by biosynthesized ZnO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites using Callistemon viminalis leaves aqueous extract: A comparative study
  87. Study of gold nanoparticles’ preparation through ultrasonic spray pyrolysis and lyophilisation for possible use as markers in LFIA tests
  88. Review Articles
  89. Advance on the dispersion treatment of graphene oxide and the graphene oxide modified cement-based materials
  90. Development of ionic liquid-based electroactive polymer composites using nanotechnology
  91. Nanostructured multifunctional electrocatalysts for efficient energy conversion systems: Recent perspectives
  92. Recent advances on the fabrication methods of nanocomposite yarn-based strain sensor
  93. Review on nanocomposites based on aerospace applications
  94. Overview of nanocellulose as additives in paper processing and paper products
  95. The frontiers of functionalized graphene-based nanocomposites as chemical sensors
  96. Material advancement in tissue-engineered nerve conduit
  97. Carbon nanostructure-based superhydrophobic surfaces and coatings
  98. Functionalized graphene-based nanocomposites for smart optoelectronic applications
  99. Interfacial technology for enhancement in steel fiber reinforced cementitious composite from nano to macroscale
  100. Metal nanoparticles and biomaterials: The multipronged approach for potential diabetic wound therapy
  101. Review on resistive switching mechanisms of bio-organic thin film for non-volatile memory application
  102. Nanotechnology-enabled biomedical engineering: Current trends, future scopes, and perspectives
  103. Research progress on key problems of nanomaterials-modified geopolymer concrete
  104. Smart stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for the cancer therapy – nanomedicine
  105. An overview of methods for production and detection of silver nanoparticles, with emphasis on their fate and toxicological effects on human, soil, and aquatic environment
  106. Effects of chemical modification and nanotechnology on wood properties
  107. Mechanisms, influencing factors, and applications of electrohydrodynamic jet printing
  108. Application of antiviral materials in textiles: A review
  109. Phase transformation and strengthening mechanisms of nanostructured high-entropy alloys
  110. Research progress on individual effect of graphene oxide in cement-based materials and its synergistic effect with other nanomaterials
  111. Catalytic defense against fungal pathogens using nanozymes
  112. A mini-review of three-dimensional network topological structure nanocomposites: Preparation and mechanical properties
  113. Mechanical properties and structural health monitoring performance of carbon nanotube-modified FRP composites: A review
  114. Nano-scale delivery: A comprehensive review of nano-structured devices, preparative techniques, site-specificity designs, biomedical applications, commercial products, and references to safety, cellular uptake, and organ toxicity
  115. Effects of alloying, heat treatment and nanoreinforcement on mechanical properties and damping performances of Cu–Al-based alloys: A review
  116. Recent progress in the synthesis and applications of vertically aligned carbon nanotube materials
  117. Thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of mono and hybrid organic- and synthetic-based nanofluids: A critical review
  118. Recent advances in waste-recycled nanomaterials for biomedical applications: Waste-to-wealth
  119. Layup sequence and interfacial bonding of additively manufactured polymeric composite: A brief review
  120. Quantum dots synthetization and future prospect applications
  121. Approved and marketed nanoparticles for disease targeting and applications in COVID-19
  122. Strategies for improving rechargeable lithium-ion batteries: From active materials to CO2 emissions
Heruntergeladen am 11.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2021-0026/html?licenseType=open-access
Button zum nach oben scrollen