Home The application of bio-nanotechnology in tumor diagnosis and treatment: a view
Article Open Access

The application of bio-nanotechnology in tumor diagnosis and treatment: a view

  • Jingyuan Li

    Jingyuan Li PhD, received his doctor’s degree in biomedical engineering from the State Key Lab of Bioelectronics (Chien-Shiung WU Laboratory), Southeast University (China), in 2012. On finishing the study, he joined the Laboratory Animal Center, Nantong University. His current research focuses on nanomedicince, novel method for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors, and animal model of human disease. He has published over 40 peer-reviewed papers and conference reports and got six Chinese invention patents. He was also invited to act as editor or special reviewer of a number of international journals.

    , Min Yao

    Min Yao PhD, received her doctor’s degree in medical science from Division of Enzyme Chemistry, Institute for Enzyme Research, the University of Tokushima (Japan), in 2011. After that, she joined the Department of Immunology, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China. Her current researches focus on the underlying molecular mechanism during the malignant transformation of non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. By now, she has published over 40 peer-reviewed papers and conference reports and applied for nine Chinese invention patents. She was also invited to act as reviewer of a number of international publications.

    , Yixiang Shao

    Yixiang Shao is the director of the Institute of Comparative Medicine, Nantong University, and the master graduate instructor. His research mainly included the construction of animal model for human disease and its application, the research of medical laboratory animal, and others. He had a comprehensive understanding for the development of medical animal science. He directs a laboratory of around 15 researchers who work in disease therapy and the construction of animal models. He has published three professional textbooks, more than 40 papers, and got three Chinese invention patents.

    EMAIL logo
    and Dengfu Yao

    Dengfu Yao got his PhD degree in gastroenterology at Medical School of Tokushima University, Japan, and post-doctoral research at Molecular Medicine, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. He was guest professor of Jiangsu University. He directs a laboratory of more than 20 researchers who work in disease diagnosis and therapy especially for cancer. Until now, he has guided more than 50 graduate students including PhD or MD, masters, post-doctors, and visiting researchers and published a series of articles and wrote some books in hepatology and oncology.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 24, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Nanotechnology is a new technology for observing and manipulating atoms and molecules in the range of 0.1–100 nm. The development of nanotechnology provides a new way for biomedicine. Based on the unique physical and chemical properties of nanomaterials, the novel biosensor based on bio-nanotechnology can be used for early diagnosis and therapy of tumors. Nowadays, the application of nanomedicine is mainly focused on the following points: tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, the accurate diagnosis and real-time monitoring of the disease, novel imaging and analysis techniques, and multifunctional drug delivery system and targeting therapy. Nanotechnology will provide effective means for accurate diagnosis and treatment of cancer. This article reviews the new progress of nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis and treatment.

1 Introduction

Malignant tumor is one of the most dangerous threats to human health because of inaccurate diagnosis and disease recurrence [1]. Due to poor target and short half-life, most kinds of anti-cancer drugs make it difficult to form effective concentration accumulation in the lesion site. The synthesis of new structural anti-cancer composites is still the focus for the related drug research, while there are still some challenges such as the long cycle, large investment, high risk, and also multidrug resistance (MDR) in tumor therapy [2], [3]. As a new method for cancer diagnosis and treatment by targeting and gene therapy, nanotechnology provides effective support for cancer treatment and drug development. Nanotechnology provides a novel platform for cancer research [4], [5].

2 Nanotechnology and the characteristics of nanomaterials

Developed in the 1990s, nanotechnology is a new technology for observing and manipulating atoms and molecules in the range of 0.1–100 nm. As a hot subject, it has a very important influence for the emergence and development of new technology and has been listed as one of the key technologies around the world in the 21st century. The idea of nanotechnology was introduced in 1959 by Feynman, an American physicist. In 1989, xenon atoms were used by the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) to form the company trademark “IBM” using scanning tunneling microscopy. And the production of a single atom at an atomic level was firstly demonstrated. In 1990, the first International Conference on Nanotechnology, held in Baltimore, marked the official birth of nanotechnology.

Compared with the macroscopic world, nanomaterials have many unique physical and chemical properties, such as size effect, surface and interface effect, small size effect, and macroscopic quantum tunneling effect. Then, many unique properties and strange phenomena of nanomaterials are shown such as the higher surface area, much more surface active center, the higher surface reaction activity, the stronger adsorption capacity, and the higher catalytic capacity [6], [7], [8]. Also there are many other characteristics such as lower melting point, higher specific heater capacity, higher expansion of absorbing coefficient, higher reaction activity, higher diffusivity, higher toughness, and stronger and strange magnetism [9], [10].

Nanotechnology provided a new way for biomedical research development. The intersection of nanotechnology and medicine also formed a new discipline, named nanomedicine, in which life information at the level of a single molecule is obtained by using nanotechnology. Following disease prevention, diagnosis and treatment is carried out in the field of nano-biomedicine. Following the ligand decorated into nanoconjugates, the balance and movement of intracellular or intercellular structures can be studied. Then, the real behavior and pathogenesis of cells is furtherly discussed to provide the strong support for the early diagnosis and treatment of various diseases as shown in Figure 1 [11].

Figure 1: Different biological responses mediated by receptor ligands and the resulting cellular fate in cancer vs. normal cells. Ligand decorated nanoconjugates would in principle gradually concentrate within tumor tissues due to the higher leakage mediated by the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and the consequent entrapment caused by ligand binding with overexpressed receptors in cancer cells. Reprinted from Akhtar et al. [11]. Copyright (2014), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 1:

Different biological responses mediated by receptor ligands and the resulting cellular fate in cancer vs. normal cells. Ligand decorated nanoconjugates would in principle gradually concentrate within tumor tissues due to the higher leakage mediated by the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and the consequent entrapment caused by ligand binding with overexpressed receptors in cancer cells. Reprinted from Akhtar et al. [11]. Copyright (2014), with permission from Elsevier.

3 Nanotechnology and medicine

Currently, nanomedicine is mainly focused on the following applications: (1) Combined with the properties of nanomaterials, nanomedical materials with good biocompatibility were developed for application in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine [12]. (2) Compared with the conventional organic dye molecules, quantum dots (QDs) have good fluorescence properties in semiconductor nanomaterials in which there is a wide range of excitation wavelengths and a narrow range of emission wavelengths. Thus, the emission peak is narrow and symmetrical, the overlap is small, the fluorescence yield is high, and the stability is good. As the ideal fluorescent probe with long fluorescent lifetime, it can be applied for accurate diagnosis and real-time monitoring of diseases [13]. (3) Based on magnetic nanomaterials, novel imaging and analysis techniques can be developed to improve the current level of pathological tissue monitoring and also develop a new type of real-time molecular imaging technology [14]. (4) Based on nanotechnology, the multifunctional drug delivery system with targeting function can be developed in which drug delivery and targeting control can be achieved to improve the efficacy of the drug and expand the scope of existing drug treatments. The cytotoxicity effects of traditional drug molecules can also be effectively reduced [11]. The combination of nanotechnology and medical technology can effectively expand the therapeutic range, improve the treatment level, and greatly promote the development of medicine.

In this paper, we mainly reviewed the application of nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis and treatment.

4 Application of nanotechnology in cancer diagnosis and treatment

4.1 Nanotechnology and cancer diagnosis

Compared with traditional methods, the novel biosensor based on nanotechnology can improve the sensitivity of clinical diagnosis, in which some pathological tissues or organs can be detected earlier and more accurately. Following the development of genetic engineering, DNA biosensor is a new type of biosensor [15], [16]. The sensitivity and reliability of the DNA sensor can be evidently improved after nanomaterials were introduced into the DNA sensor design with higher DNA loading and amplified electrochemical detection signals. This DNA nano-sensor can be used to determine target DNA sequence, DNA mutation, and so on [17]. The oligonucleotide probes loaded with QDs (such as CdSe/ZnS or CdTe/CdS) can be used to study chromosomal abnormality and mutation, with good stability and biosafety. This kind of probes cannot impair the activity of antibodies, proteins, or DNA [18], [19], [20]. Using magnetic nanoparticles (NPs) as a DNA carrier or a template for DNA replication and amplification, the detection of DNA molecule and a single mismatched base can be realized by chemiluminescence technique [21], [22].

The cell biosensor based on nano-biotechnology can detect and distinguish different types of tumor cells with high sensitivity and speed and also evaluate the drug resistance of tumor cells. Then a reliable basis for cancer diagnosis and treatment can be provided [23]. As a high-throughput analytical technique based on nanotechnology, microfluidic chip has many characteristics such as lower energy consumption, shorter detection time, higher detection efficiency, lower detection cost, and so on. In clinical diagnosis, some important index of cancer such as carcinoembryonic antigen in human blood can be highly detected by the immunoassay microfluidic chip. Compared with the conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent test (ELISA), the detection sensitivity of this immunoassay microfluidic chip is increased by 30 times. The correlation coefficient of these two methods was as high as 0.917, while the total analysis time was shortened from 45 h to 35 min [24], [25]. A liver tumor below 3 mm diameter can be sensitively found by superparamagnetic iron oxide microparticles, which is greatly significant for early diagnosis [26]. A cell sorting strategy based on anti-CD45 antibody-modified magnetic nanospheres was studied; leukocyte depletion efficiency was up to 99.9% within 30 min in simulated clinical samples, and the purity of the spiked hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells was improved 265–317-fold [27]. Also, as potential biomedical nanomaterials, nano-cytotoxicity should be further studied in the future.

4.2 Fluorescent quantum dots and tumor markers or medical imaging

As a kind of NPs composed of II–VI and III–V elements (such as CdSe, CdTe, ZnSe, InP, InAs, and so on), QDs have excellent luminescence properties of fluorescence. The fluorescence intensity of QDs is higher than that of commonly used organic fluorescent dyes (such as Rhodamine B and 6G, etc.), and the stability is high. QDs have good anti-photobleaching ability, good biocompatibility, and long fluorescence lifetime [28]. It can be used as an ideal fluorescent probe and nano-carrier material and has been applied in the study of cell localization, signal transduction, and the movement and migration of intracellular molecules, with important application value in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases as shown in Figure 2 [29], [30]. Our previous study also indicated that, as drug carriers, surface functionalized CdTe QDs can improve the anti-tumor effect for tumor cells. Importantly, it can realize real-time labeling and monitoring of tumor cells and provide a new way to realize the “integration” process of monitoring and treatment during cancer therapy [31]. In particular, near infrared wavelength (700–900 nm) has a strong ability to penetrate tissue and resist bleaching, and it can avoid the interference of tissue scattering, absorption and background auto-fluorescence. Deep tissue imaging can be performed based on the near infrared QDs, with little or no side effects [32]. It has important research value in the fields of molecular imaging, non-invasive online monitoring, early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

Figure 2: A multifunctional probe consisting of a recognition unit of goat anti-mouse IgG to label the anti-EpCAM antibody, a fluorescent dye (Cy3) moiety for fluorescence (FL) imaging and upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) tag for both inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) quantification and upconversion luminescence (UCL) imaging of cancer cells. Cancer cells were counted and dual-modal imaged by using ICP-MS detection and down-conversion FL/UCL. A limit of detection of 1×102 HepG2 cells and a relative standard deviation of 7.1% for seven replicate determinations of 1×103 HepG2 cells were obtained under the optimized conditions [29]. Reprinted from Yang et al. [29]. Copyright (2017), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 2:

A multifunctional probe consisting of a recognition unit of goat anti-mouse IgG to label the anti-EpCAM antibody, a fluorescent dye (Cy3) moiety for fluorescence (FL) imaging and upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) tag for both inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) quantification and upconversion luminescence (UCL) imaging of cancer cells. Cancer cells were counted and dual-modal imaged by using ICP-MS detection and down-conversion FL/UCL. A limit of detection of 1×102 HepG2 cells and a relative standard deviation of 7.1% for seven replicate determinations of 1×103 HepG2 cells were obtained under the optimized conditions [29]. Reprinted from Yang et al. [29]. Copyright (2017), with permission from Elsevier.

In vitro studies also showed that QDs can be used to directly and quantitatively characterize tumor cells. These NPs can be used to collect the biomarkers or make the markers not degraded to improve the detection sensitivity. The time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) imaging technique was applied to immunohistochemistry in which the number of related lanthanide chelate nanoparticles is linear with the number of prostate specific antibodies [33]. Combined with QDs and multiphoton imaging, the transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein was studied to observe the cells and tissues around the tumor vessels. The results indicated that real-time imaging could be achieved and the tumor vessel can be distinguished from the perivascular cells and tissues by labeling with fluorescent nanocrystals. It opens up a new way for the study of tumor pathophysiology [34]. There are some diagnostic techniques (such as radiation diagnosis, X-ray tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) that are combined with nanomaterials [35]. By controlling the dosage, the number of injection times, and the time interval, the toxicity of some NPs could be controlled to some extent.

Based on molecular recognition such as ligand and receptor, antigen and antibody reaction, the targeted imaging of lesions in vivo can be achieved by specific labeling with QDs. Folic acid can be covalently linked to PEGylated cyano propionic acid ester to form nano clusters. The affinity of these nano-covalent polymers with the folate binding protein was 10 times that of the folic acid alone [36], [37]. If the monoclonal antibody is attached to the semiconductor NPs modified by polyethylene glycol, QDs can accumulate in the tumor site and attain accurate positioning of the tumor tissue after the intravenous injection. The anti-growth factor antibody was linked with QDs, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) could be accurately conjugated and labelled to detect biomarkers of early cervical cancer. Combined with optical imaging technology, the changes of cervical cancer can be detected at the molecular level. It is helpful for the patients before tumor metastasis [38], [39].

4.3 Nanotechnology and tumor therapy

Nanotechnology has made great progress in the research on disease treatment. Using magnetocaloric (magnetothermal) effect and photothermal effect of some nanomaterials, a series of new treatments have been developed. In particular, the use of superparamagnetic magnetic materials can achieve high sensitivity for tumor lesions imaging and diagnosis. Also, under the action of the external magnetic field, the temperature can be increased to 40–45°C to kill the tumor cells. Through the development of nanomedical devices, some complex tasks can be completed such as intracellular drug delivery, power generation, and even cleaning up the harmful deposits in blood vessels. Then, medical cell operation and biological treatment can be carried out [40], [41], [42], [43].

Semiconductor nanomaterials generally have good photocatalytic activity, which can be used as a photosensitizer applied to tumor photodynamic therapy (PDT) [44]. Combined with photosensitizer, PDT can selectively destroy the local abnormal tissue (including tumor) by selective photodynamic reaction. The basic mechanism is that the positioned photosensitizer in the targeted cells or tissues is stimulated to release the reactive oxygen species (ROS), including singlet oxygen and oxygen-free radical. Many kinds of biological molecules in tumor tissues and cells can react with ROS, in which cytotoxicity will emerge and eventually lead to the death of tumor cells and the disappearance of tumor tissues. PDT plays an increasingly important role in cancer therapy [45]. A nano photosensitizer was developed by British researchers to help treat colon cancer HT29 cells, in which poly lysine was placed into phthalocyanine to form polylysine bound tetrasulfonato-aluminum phthalocyanine entrapped nanoparticles (PCNP) NPs (45±10 nm), then porphyrin was loaded on the surface of the PCNP to form PCNP-P NPs (95±10 nm). Here, each NP can carry hundreds of photosensitive molecules, with the ability to deliver a large number of light-sensitive molecules to the tumor site. In PDT, it can carry a large number of photosensitive molecules into the tumor to kill cancer cells. The effect is better than the conventional method. The effect of PDT was enhanced by carrying two different photosensitive molecules [46].

Many nanomaterials, especially semiconductor nanomaterials such as nano titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO), have good photocatalytic activity [47], [48]. Compared with the ordinary photosensitizer, nanomaterials have good stability, high catalytic performance, and low cost and cytotoxicity. More importantly, it can selectively destroy the tumor but not endanger the normal organization. PDT has played an important role in the treatment of skin cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, and other tumors [49]. PDT enriches the application scope of the photosensitizer and plays an important role in the combined therapy of tumors. In our study, a new type of TiO2 nano-whisker material was prepared by modification and doping of the crystal structure, which can improve the photocatalytic effect of TiO2 nanomaterials and effectively kill the tumor cells [50].

4.4 Nano-drug delivery system and tumor therapy

Because of its high specific surface area and surface and interface effect, nanomaterials have a natural advantage as drug carriers. Some surface-modified NPs can evade the identification of macrophages and can better target the tumor tissues except the mononuclear phagocytic system. Polyvinylpyrrolidone and PEG (poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-b-poly(ethylene glycol)) NPs can be loaded with different drug molecules. In vitro and in vivo melanoma experiments showed that these drug nanocompounds had obvious anti-tumor effect as shown in Figure 3 [51], [52]. Dextran adriamycin loaded into chitosan NPs (about 100 nm diameter) can significantly increase the drug absorption by Hela cells and liver cancer cells [53]. Aclarubicin loaded into the activated carbon NPs was given to mice with lymph node metastasis by local injection. The results showed that this drug delivery system can be selectively distributed on the local lymphatic system and form a high drug concentration in this region, while aclacinomycin concentration is very low in other parts of the mouse body [54]. The common chemotherapeutic agents such as daunorubicin and doxorubicin (DOX) were loaded into different types of nanomaterials (such as Fe3O4 NPs [55], ZnO NPs [56], carbon nanotubes [57], and so on). In vivo and in vitro studies showed that nano-drug complexes can significantly increase the effective concentration of chemotherapeutic agents in tumor cells and improve the cytotoxicity effect of drugs for tumor cells. Moreover, the nano-drug complex has no obvious side effects on the normal visceral tissues of the experimental rats, and the safety of the chemotherapeutic drugs is improved [58], [59], [60].

Figure 3: Preparation of aptamer-functionalized, DOX-loaded NPs via nanoprecipitation of amphiphilic block copolymers, followed by carbodiimide-mediated aptamer coupling. As a targeted drug delivery system, these nanoparticles were roughly 100–125 nm in diameter and have a high encapsulated efficiency for DOX. Reprinted by permission from Weigum et al. [51].
Figure 3:

Preparation of aptamer-functionalized, DOX-loaded NPs via nanoprecipitation of amphiphilic block copolymers, followed by carbodiimide-mediated aptamer coupling. As a targeted drug delivery system, these nanoparticles were roughly 100–125 nm in diameter and have a high encapsulated efficiency for DOX. Reprinted by permission from Weigum et al. [51].

The current report indicated that drug resistance can also be largely overcome by the nanomaterial itself or by the formation of nano-drug complex. For example, it is believed that P-gp reverse by NPs may be attributed to the high drug concentrations in the vicinity of the cell membrane following the drug’s transport into the cell. This locally high concentration of drugs is thought to saturate the P-gp glycoprotein [61]. Some nanomaterials were combined with chemotherapy drugs and MDR reversal agents to enhance the effect of MDR, in which poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) can encapsulate adriamycin and cyclosporin A to form a nanocomposite drug. The in vitro and in vivo results indicated that these nanocomposite drugs can increase the local drug concentration in tumor cells and play the role of P-gp antagonists. The reversal of MDR was enhanced because of the synergistic effect of these two agents [62]. In other reports, water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) double-emulsion method was used to coload antisense-miRNA-21 and gemcitabine (GEM; 2′-deoxy-2′,2′-difluorocytidine) in PEGylated-PLGA-NPs, and PEGylated-PLGA NPs co-encapsulated with antisense-miRNA-21 and gemcitabine (GEM) was synthesized. The therapeutic efficacy in human HCC (Hep3B and HepG2) cells in vitro was tested. The cellular uptake of NPs displayed time-dependent increase of NP concentration inside the cells. These co-encapsulated NPs revealed increased treatment efficacy in HCC cells as shown in Figure 4 [63]. In addition, the nanocomposite drug between magnetic Fe3O4 NPs and DOX can reverse MDR of leukemia K562/A02 cell line. Through the signal pathway of transferrin receptor, the mRNA level of MDR gene (MDR1) was reduced, and the MDR was reversed [64], [65].

Figure 4: Water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) double emulsion method was used to coload antisense-miRNA-21 and GEM in PEGylated-PLGA-NPs. These co-encapsulated nanoparticles revealed increased treatment efficacy in HCC cells, compared to cells treated with either antisense-miRNA-21- or GEM-loaded NPs at equal concentration, indicating that down-regulation of endogenous miRNA-21 function can reduce HCC cell viability and proliferation in response to GEM treatment. Reprinted with permission from Devulapally [63]. Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.
Figure 4:

Water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) double emulsion method was used to coload antisense-miRNA-21 and GEM in PEGylated-PLGA-NPs. These co-encapsulated nanoparticles revealed increased treatment efficacy in HCC cells, compared to cells treated with either antisense-miRNA-21- or GEM-loaded NPs at equal concentration, indicating that down-regulation of endogenous miRNA-21 function can reduce HCC cell viability and proliferation in response to GEM treatment. Reprinted with permission from Devulapally [63]. Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society.

HCC is caused by many factors, such as viral and chemical carcinogens, which lead to uncontrolled growth of HCC. HCC has a high malignancy degree, and surgical resection often loses the best time for treatment following the high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. Early diagnosis and treatment is an effective way to improve the survival rate of HCC patients [66], [67]. Nanotechnology gradually played an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can serve as a biomarker in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC. The immunomagnetic reduction method constructed by the magnetic NPs and the high temperature superconducting quantum interference device can quantitatively detect the low VEGF concentration of HCC rat model. The detection limit was between 2 pg/ml and 8000 pg/ml, and the detection sensitivity was higher than that of the traditional ELISA method [68]. Based on proteomics, nano liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry technology can be used to analyze 59 known or unknown proteins expressed in HCC cell membrane. Then, the occurrence and development of HCC can be detected for the early diagnosis of cancer. Also, the high throughput screening of new drug evaluation can be used by this technology [69]. As a kind of specific protein, GPC3 (Glypican-3) is overexpressed on the surface of liver cancer cells and plays a great significance for the early diagnosis of HCC. αGPC3 (the monoclonal antibody of GPC3) labeled with biotin was attached to the surface of superparamagnetic NPs, and HepG2 cells highly expressing GPC3 can be targeted by these nanocomposites. These targeted nanocomposites can bring out dual imaging function, in which tumors can be early diagnosed. Also, the tumor site can be really time monitored during the operation. It plays an important clinical value in HCC diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis [70].

On the surface of liver cells, there is a galactose receptor that can bind to the glycoprotein ligand containing galactose residues at nonreduced ends. This conjugation could actively transfer into the liver cells. Galactose amine (GAL)-albumin (AN) NPs were synthesized by conjugation with GAL and AN, then loaded with DOX. This GAL-DOX-AN nano-drug system can be used for liver cancer’s targeted therapy and achieve the active transport of anticancer drugs [71]. The PLGA NPs loaded with paclitaxel and galactose can increase the encapsulation efficiency of paclitaxel and control drug release by reducing the hydrophobicity of particles surface and increasing the potential. Thus, there is a significant targeting and cytotoxicity for HepG2 cells [72]. There are binding sites for glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) and glycyrrhizic acid on the liver cell membrane. Thus, GA and glycyrrhizic acid can be used as the guiding groups in the liver-targeted drug delivery system. DOX-loaded GA-modified alginate (ALG) NPs (DOX/GA-ALG NPs) have a good targeting effect on HepG2 cells and can significantly inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells. Importantly, the heart cells and the liver cells surrounding the tumor were not affected by administration of DOX/GA-ALG NPs, whereas myocardial necrosis and apparent liver cell swelling were observed after DOX⋅HCl administration as shown in Figure 5 [73]. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) can stimulate the growth of epithelial cells and promote the occurrence of tumor. EGFR can be specifically combined with EGF, transforming growth factor and other ligands. There is expression of EGFR in normal tissues, but the expression in tumor tissues is much higher than that in normal tissues [74]. In vivo experiments showed that paclitaxel NPs targeted to EGFR were firstly clustered in the liver, then in kidney and tumor tissues. The peak value was reached in the tumor tissue after administration of 3 h [75].

Figure 5: DOX released from DOX/GA-ALG NPs was pharmacologically active and therefore able to target and induce cell death in tumor cells. Both DOX/GA-ALG NPs and DOX⋅HCl suppress tumor growth compared with the saline group, and DOX/GA-ALG NPs exhibited the greatest antitumor effects. (A) Image of Kunming mice bearing H22 liver tumor in situ and a tissue slice of liver tumor in situ. (B) Representative photographs of excised H22 tumors in situ from mice treated with saline, GA-ALG NPs, DOX⋅HCl and DOX/GA-ALG NPs. Reprinted from Zhang et al. [73]. Copyright (2012), with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 5:

DOX released from DOX/GA-ALG NPs was pharmacologically active and therefore able to target and induce cell death in tumor cells. Both DOX/GA-ALG NPs and DOX⋅HCl suppress tumor growth compared with the saline group, and DOX/GA-ALG NPs exhibited the greatest antitumor effects. (A) Image of Kunming mice bearing H22 liver tumor in situ and a tissue slice of liver tumor in situ. (B) Representative photographs of excised H22 tumors in situ from mice treated with saline, GA-ALG NPs, DOX⋅HCl and DOX/GA-ALG NPs. Reprinted from Zhang et al. [73]. Copyright (2012), with permission from Elsevier.

5 Prospect

Nanotechnology has a promising application in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of cancer. Obviously, there are still many problems to be solved before clinical practice. The safety and biocompatibility of nanomaterials should be taken into account, such as the interaction between nanomaterials and the human body. The impact on reproduction or genetics should also be assessed. In order to prepare new materials or modify the structure of existing materials, the targeting and detection sensitivity of nanomaterials should be improved, and the conversion rate of its application should also be accelerated. The application field of these existing nanocomposite drugs can be expanded. With the development of nanotechnology, nanotechnology will play an important role in tumor diagnosis and treatment.

About the authors

Jingyuan Li

Jingyuan Li PhD, received his doctor’s degree in biomedical engineering from the State Key Lab of Bioelectronics (Chien-Shiung WU Laboratory), Southeast University (China), in 2012. On finishing the study, he joined the Laboratory Animal Center, Nantong University. His current research focuses on nanomedicince, novel method for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors, and animal model of human disease. He has published over 40 peer-reviewed papers and conference reports and got six Chinese invention patents. He was also invited to act as editor or special reviewer of a number of international journals.

Min Yao

Min Yao PhD, received her doctor’s degree in medical science from Division of Enzyme Chemistry, Institute for Enzyme Research, the University of Tokushima (Japan), in 2011. After that, she joined the Department of Immunology, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China. Her current researches focus on the underlying molecular mechanism during the malignant transformation of non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. By now, she has published over 40 peer-reviewed papers and conference reports and applied for nine Chinese invention patents. She was also invited to act as reviewer of a number of international publications.

Yixiang Shao

Yixiang Shao is the director of the Institute of Comparative Medicine, Nantong University, and the master graduate instructor. His research mainly included the construction of animal model for human disease and its application, the research of medical laboratory animal, and others. He had a comprehensive understanding for the development of medical animal science. He directs a laboratory of around 15 researchers who work in disease therapy and the construction of animal models. He has published three professional textbooks, more than 40 papers, and got three Chinese invention patents.

Dengfu Yao

Dengfu Yao got his PhD degree in gastroenterology at Medical School of Tokushima University, Japan, and post-doctoral research at Molecular Medicine, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. He was guest professor of Jiangsu University. He directs a laboratory of more than 20 researchers who work in disease diagnosis and therapy especially for cancer. Until now, he has guided more than 50 graduate students including PhD or MD, masters, post-doctors, and visiting researchers and published a series of articles and wrote some books in hepatology and oncology.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Funder ID: 10.13039/ 501100002858, 2015M571794), Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Fundation (1401087B), and the Natural Science Foundation of Nantong University (13R30 and 13ZY008).

References

[1] Smith C. Cancer shows strength through diversity. Nature 2013, 499, 505–508.10.1038/499505aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Paul S, Moye-Rowley WS. Multidrug resistance in fungi: regulation of transporter-encoding gene expression. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 143.10.3389/fphys.2014.00143Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] El Zowalaty ME, Gyetvai B. Effectiveness of antipseudomonal antibiotics and mechanisms of multidrug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Pol. J. Microbiol. 2016, 65, 23–32.10.5604/17331331.1197272Search in Google Scholar

[4] Im H, Lee K, Weissleder R, Lee H, Castro CM. Novel nanosensing technologies for exosome detection and profiling. Lab Chip 2017, 17, 2892–2898.10.1039/C7LC00247ESearch in Google Scholar

[5] Song CX, Zhang SB, Zhou Q, Hai H, Zhao DF, Hui YZ. Upconversion nanoparticles for bioimaging. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2017, 6, 233–242.10.1515/ntrev-2016-0043Search in Google Scholar

[6] Fissell WH. What is nanotechnology? Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2013, 20, 452–453.10.1053/j.ackd.2013.08.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Rasheed PA, Sandhyarani N. Carbon nanostructures as immobilization platform for DNA: a review on current progress in electrochemical DNA sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 97, 226–237.10.1016/j.bios.2017.06.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Qiu H, Min YZ, Rodgers Z, Zhang LZ, Wang AZ. Nanomedicine approaches to improve cancer immunotherapy. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 9, e1456.10.1002/wnan.1456Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Manickam V, Velusamy RK, Lochana R, Amiti, Rajendran B, Tamizhselvi R. Applications and genotoxicity of nanomaterials in the food industry. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017, 15, 399–412.10.1007/s10311-017-0633-3Search in Google Scholar

[10] Damborska D, Bertok T, Dosekova E, Holazova A, Lorencova L, Kasak P, Tkac J. Nanomaterial-based biosensors for detection of prostate specific antigen. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 3049–3067.10.1007/s00604-017-2410-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Akhtar MJ, Ahamed M, Alhadlaq HA, Alrokayan SA, Kumar S. Targeted anticancer therapy: over-expressed receptors and nanotechnology. Clin. Chim. Acta 2014, 436, 78–92.10.1016/j.cca.2014.05.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Mura S, Nicolas J, Couvreur P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 991–1003.10.1038/nmat3776Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Peng L, He M, Chen B, Wu Q, Zhang Z, Pang D, Zhu Y, Hu B. Cellular uptake, elimination and toxicity of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in HepG2 cells. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 9545–9558.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.038Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Su XY, Liu PD, Wu H, Gu N. Enhancement of radiosensitization by metal-based nanoparticles in cancer radiation therapy. Cancer Biol. Med. 2014, 11, 86–91.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Chen JY, Liu ZJ, Peng HP, Zheng YJ, Lin Z, Liu AL, Chen W, Lin XH. Electrochemical DNA biosensor based on grafting-to mode of terminal deoxynucleoside transferase-mediated extension. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 98, 345–349.10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Petralia S, Cosentino T, Sinatra F, Favetta M, Fiorenza P, Bongiorno C, Sciuto EL, Conoci S, Libertino S. Silicon nitride surfaces as active substrate for electrical DNA biosensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 252, 492–502.10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.023Search in Google Scholar

[17] Peng YR, Qiu CM, Jockusch S, Scott AM, Li ZM, Turro NJ, Ju JY. CdSe/ZnS core shell quantum dot-based FRET binary oligonucleotide probes for detection of nucleic acids. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2012, 11, 881–884.10.1039/C1PP05132FSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Santos AR, Miguel AS, Macovei A, Maycock C, Balestrazzi A, Oliva A, Fevereiro P. CdSe/ZnS quantum dots trigger DNA repair and antioxidant enzyme systems in Medicago sativa cells in suspension culture. BMC Biotechnol. 2013, 13, 111.10.1186/1472-6750-13-111Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Takalkar S, Baryeh K, Liu GD. Fluorescent carbon nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of DNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 98, 147–154.10.1016/j.bios.2017.06.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Yu MZ, Zhao KL, Zhu XH, Tang SY, Nie Z, Huang Y, Zhao P, Yao SZ. Development of near-infrared ratiometric fluorescent probe based on cationic conjugated polymer and CdTe/CdS QDs for label-free determination of glucose in human body fluids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 95, 41–47.10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.065Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Sun W, Qi X, Chen Y, Liu S, Gao H. Application of chitosan/Fe3O4 microsphere-graphene composite modified carbon ionic liquid electrode for the electrochemical detection of the PCR product of soybean Lectin gene sequence. Talanta 2011, 87, 106–112.10.1016/j.talanta.2011.09.047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Zhang YL, Li HY, Chen M, Fang X, Pang PF, Wang HB, Wu Z, Yang WR. Ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for silver ion based on magnetic nanoparticles labeling with hybridization chain reaction amplification strategy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 249, 431–438.10.1016/j.snb.2017.04.108Search in Google Scholar

[23] Wu XJ, Jiang H, Zhou YY, Li JY, Wu CH, Wu CY, Chen BA, Wang XM. Selective determination of drug resistant cancer cells on indium tin oxide electrode modified with nano titanium dioxide. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 12, 962–965.10.1016/j.elecom.2010.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[24] Chen L, Yang GC, Wu P, Cai CX. Real-time fluorescence assay of alkaline phosphatase in living cells using boron-doped graphene quantum dots as fluorophores. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 96, 294–299.10.1016/j.bios.2017.05.022Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Wu IC, Weng YH, Lu MY, Jen CP, Fedorov VE, Chen WC, Wu MT, Kuo CT, Wang HC. Nano-structure ZnO/Cu2O photoelectrochemical and self-powered biosensor for esophageal cancer cell detection. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 7689–7706.10.1364/OE.25.007689Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Farkhani SM, Valizadeh A, Karami H, Mohammadi S, Sohrabi N, Badrzadeh F. Cell penetrating peptides: efficient vectors for delivery of nanoparticles, nanocarriers, therapeutic and diagnostic molecules. Peptides 2014, 57, 78–94.10.1016/j.peptides.2014.04.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Chen L, Wu LL, Zhang ZL, Hu J, Tang M, Qi CB, Li N, Pang DW. Biofunctionalized magnetic nanospheres-based cell sorting strategy for efficient isolation, detection and subtype analyses of heterogeneous circulating hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 85, 633–640.10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.071Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Blanco-Canosacf JB, Wu M, Susumu K, Petryayeva E, Jennings TL, Dawson PE, Algar WR, Medintza IL. Recent progress in the bioconjugation of quantum dots. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 263, 101–137.10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.030Search in Google Scholar

[29] Yang B, Zhang Y, Chen BB, He M, Yin X, Wang H, Li XT, Hu B. A multifunctional probe for ICP-MS determination and multimodal imaging of cancer cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 96, 77–83.10.1016/j.bios.2017.04.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Chatzimitakos T, Kasouni A, Sygellou L, Avgeropoulos A, Troganis A, Stalikas C. Two of a kind but different: luminescent carbon quantum dots from citrus peels for iron and tartrazine sensing and cell imaging. Talanta 2014, 175, 305–312.10.1016/j.talanta.2017.07.053Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Li JY, Wu CY, Xu PP, Shi LX, Chen BA, Selke M, Jiang H, Wang XM. Multifunctional effects of Cys-CdTe QDs conjugated with gambogic acid for cancer cell tracing and inhibition. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 6518–6525.10.1039/c3ra23424jSearch in Google Scholar

[32] van Veggel FCJM. Near-infrared quantum dots and their delicate synthesis, challenging characterization, and exciting potential applications. Cheminform 2014, 45, 111–122.10.1002/chin.201409233Search in Google Scholar

[33] Planellesaragó J, Cordoncillo E, Ferreira RAS, Carlos LD, Escribano P. Synthesis, characterization and optical studies on lanthanide-doped CdS quantum dots: new insights on CdS→ lanthanide energy transfer mechanisms. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 1162–1170.10.1039/C0JM03188GSearch in Google Scholar

[34] Wang EC, Wang AZ. Nanoparticles and their applications in cell and molecular biology. Integr. Biol. (Camb). 2014, 6, 9–26.10.1039/c3ib40165kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Pray-In Y, Rutnakornpituk B, Wichai U, Vilaivan T, Rutnakornpituk M. Hydrophilic azlactone-functionalized magnetite nanoparticle for conjugation with folic acid. J. Nanopart. Res. 2014, 16, 2357.10.1007/s11051-014-2357-7Search in Google Scholar

[36] Merzel RL, Boutom SM, Chen JJ, Frey C, Shedden K, Marsh EN, Holl MMB. Folate binding protein: therapeutic natural nanotechnology for folic acid, methotrexate, and leucovorin. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 2603–2615.10.1039/C6NR09060ESearch in Google Scholar

[37] Merzel RL, Frey C, Chen JJ, Garn R, van Dongen MA, Dougherty CA, Kandaluru AK, Low PS, Marsh ENG, Banaszak Holl MM. Conjugation dependent interaction of folic acid with folate binding protein. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017, 28, 2350–2360.10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00373Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Wegner KD, Lindén S, Jin Z, Jennings TL, el Khoulati R, van Bergen en Henegouwen PM, Hildebrandt N. Nanobodies and nanocrystals: highly sensitive quantum dot-based homogeneous FRET immunoassay for serum-based EGFR detection. Small 2014, 10, 734–740.10.1002/smll.201302383Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Su YC, Burnouf PA, Chuang KH, Chen BM, Cheng TL, Roffler SR. Conditional internalization of PEGylated nanomedicines by PEG engagers for triple negative breast cancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15507.10.1038/ncomms15507Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[40] Gowda R, Jones NR, Banerjee S, Robertson GP. Use of nanotechnology to develop multi-drug inhibitors for cancer therapy. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 184.10.4172/2157-7439.1000184Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] MNneil SE, Nanotechnology for the biologist. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005, 78, 585–594.10.1189/jlb.0205074Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Li Z, Tan SR, Li S, Shen Q, Wang KH. Cancer drug delivery in the nano era: an overview and perspectives. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 611–624.10.3892/or.2017.5718Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[43] Jacob JA, Salmani JMM, Chen BA. Magnetic nanoparticles: mechanistic studies on the cancer cell interaction. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2016, 5, 481–488.10.1515/ntrev-2016-0022Search in Google Scholar

[44] Triesscheijn M, Baas P, Schellens JH, Stewart FA. Photodynamic therapy in oncology. Oncologist 2006, 11, 1034–1044.10.1634/theoncologist.11-9-1034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Dolmans DE, Dai F, Jain RK. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 380–387.10.1038/nrc1071Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Kuruppuarachchi M, Savoie H, Lowry A, Alonso C, Boyle RW. Polyacrylamide nanoparticles as a delivery system in photodynamic therapy. Mol. Pharm. 2011, 8, 920–931.10.1021/mp200023ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Grabowska E, Diak M, Marchelek M, Zaleska-Medynska A. Decahedral TiO2 with exposed facets: synthesis, properties, photoactivity and applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 156–157, 213–235.10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.03.019Search in Google Scholar

[48] Tsay JM, Trzoss M, Shi LX, Kong X, Selke M, Jung ME, Weiss S. Singlet oxygen production by peptide-coated quantum dot-photosensitizer conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6865–6871.10.1021/ja070713iSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[49] Kessel D, Reiners JJ. Enhanced efficacy of photodynamic therapy via a sequential targeting protocol. Photochem. Photobiol. 2014, 90, 889–895.10.1111/php.12270Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[50] Li JY, Wang XM, Shao YX, Lu XH, Chen BA. A novel exploration of combination of gambogic acid with TiO2 nanofibers: the photodynamic effect for HepG2 cells proliferation. Materials 2014, 7, 6865–6878.10.3390/ma7096865Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[51] Weigum S, McIvor E, Munoz C, Feng R, Cantu T, Walsh K, Betancourt T. Targeted therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma with aptamer-functionalized biodegradable nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016, 18, 341.10.1007/s11051-016-3633-5Search in Google Scholar

[52] Vaghani SS, Patel MM. pH-sensitive hydrogels based on semi-interpenetrating network (semi-IPN) of chitosan and polyvinyl pyrrolidone for clarithromycin release. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2011, 37, 1160–1169.10.3109/03639045.2011.563422Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Chen C, Zhou JL, Han X, Song F, Wang XL, Wang YZ. A prodrug strategy based on chitosan for efficient intracellular anticancer drug delivery. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 255101.10.1088/0957-4484/25/25/255101Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Alexeev I, Sultana A, Mantsala P, Niemi J, Schneider G. Aclacinomycin oxidoreductase (AknOx) from the biosynthetic pathway of the antibiotic aclacinomycin is an unusual flavoenzyme with a dual active site. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6170–6175.10.1073/pnas.0700579104Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[55] Zhang G, Ding L, Renegar R, Wang XM, Lu Q, Huo SQ, Chen YH. Hydroxycamptothecin-loaded Fe3O4 nanoparticles induce human lung cancer cell apoptosis through caspase-8 pathway activation and disrupt tight junctions. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 1216–1222.10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01930.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[56] Zhang HJ, Chen BA, Jiang H, Wang CL, Wang HP, Wang XM. A strategy for ZnO nanorod mediated multi-mode cancer treatment. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1906–1914.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Li QN, Wu XJ, Zhao J, Wu CY, Wang XM. Real-time detection of the interaction between anticancer drug daunorubicin and cancer cells by Au-MCNT nanocomposites modified electrodes. Sci. China Chem. 2011, 54, 812–815.10.1007/s11426-010-4123-8Search in Google Scholar

[58] Odiba A, Ukegbu C, Anunobi O, Chukwunonyelum I, Esemonu J. Making drugs safer: improving drug delivery and reducing the side effect of drugs on the human biochemical system. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2016, 5, 183–194.10.1515/ntrev-2015-0055Search in Google Scholar

[59] Wu WW, Chen BA, Cheng J, Wang J, Xu WL, Liu LJ, Xia GH, Wei HL, Wang XM, Yang MM, Yang LY, Zhang Y, Xu CL, Li JY. Biocompatibility of Fe3O4/DNR magnetic nanoparticles in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5, 1079–1084.10.2147/IJN.S15660Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[60] Chen BA, Cheng J, Wu YN, Gao F, Xu WL, Shen HL, Ding JH, Gao C, Sun Q, Sun XC, Cheng HY, Li GH, Chen WJ, Chen NN, Liu LJ, Li XM, Wang XM. Reversal of multidrug resistance by magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticle copolymerizating daunorubicin and 5-bromotetrandrine in xenograft nude-mice. Int. J. Nanomed. 2009, 4, 73–78.10.2147/IJN.S5093Search in Google Scholar

[61] Bogush TA, Dudko EA, Bogush EA, VIu K, Antonov VG. Glutoxime – an inhibitor of multiple drug resistance phenotype associated with Pgp expression. Antibiot. Khimioter. 2010, 55, 18–23.Search in Google Scholar

[62] Xu L, Li H, Wang YB, Dong F, Wang HB, Zhang ST. Enhanced activity of doxorubicin in drug resistant A549 tumor cells by encapsulation of P-glycoprotein inhibitor in PLGA-based nanovectors. Oncol. Lett. 2014, 7, 387–392.10.3892/ol.2013.1711Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[63] Devulapally R, Foygel K, Sekar TV, Willmann JK, Paulmurugan R. Gemcitabine and antisense-microRNA co-encapsulated PLGA–PEG polymer nanoparticles for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016, 8, 33412–33422.10.1021/acsami.6b08153Search in Google Scholar

[64] Chen BA, Lai BB, Cheng J, Xia GH, Gao F, Xu WL, Ding JH, Gao C, Sun XC, Xu CR, Chen WJ, Chen NN, Liu LJ, Li XM, Wang XM. Daunorubicin-loaded magnetic nanoparticles of Fe3O4 overcome multidrug resistance and induce apoptosis of K562-N/VCR cells in vivo.Int. J. Nanomed. 2009, 4, 201–208.10.2147/IJN.S7287Search in Google Scholar

[65] Wang J, Chen BA, Cheng J, Cai XH, Xia GH, Liu R, Wang XM. Apoptotic mechanism of human leukemia K562/A02 cells induced by magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles co-loaded with daunorubicin and 5-bromotetrandrin. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 1027–1034.10.2147/IJN.S18023Search in Google Scholar

[66] Wang L, Yao M, Dong ZZ, Zhang Y, Yao DF. Circulating specific biomarkers in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and its metastasis monitoring. Tumor Biol. 2014, 35, 9–20.10.1007/s13277-013-1141-0Search in Google Scholar

[67] Yao M, Yao DF, Bian YZ, Wu W, Yan XD, Yu DD, Qiu LW, Yang JL, Zhang HJ, Sai WL, Chen J. Values of circulating GPC-3mRNA and AFP in detecting patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2013, 12, 171–179.10.1016/S1499-3872(13)60028-4Search in Google Scholar

[68] Huang KW, Yang SY, Yu CY, Chieh JJ, Yang CC, Horng HE, Hong CY, Yang HC, Wu CC. Exploration of the relationship between the tumor burden and the concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor in liver-cancer-bearing animals using immunomagnetic reduction assay. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2011, 7, 535–541.10.1166/jbn.2011.1321Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Long XH, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Yao J, Cai ZW, Yang PY. Nano-LC-MS/MS based proteomics of hepatocellular carcinoma cells compared to Chang liver cells and tanshinone IIA induction. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7, 1728–1741.10.1039/c0mb00343cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Park JO, Stephen Z, Sun C, Veiseh O, Kievit FM, Fang C, Leung M, Mok H, Zhang M. Glypican-3 targeting of liver cancer cells using multifunctional nanoparticles. Mol. Imaging 2011, 10, 69–77.10.2310/7290.2010.00048Search in Google Scholar

[71] Shen Z, Wei W, Tanaka H, Kohama K, Ma G, Dobashi T, Maki Y, Wang H, Bi J, Dai S. A galactosamine-mediated drug delivery carrier for targeted liver cancer therapy. Pharmacol. Res. 2011, 64, 410–419.10.1016/j.phrs.2011.06.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[72] Wang YJ, Jiang GQ, Qiu TT, Ding FX. Preparation and evaluation of paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticle incorporated with galactose-carrying polymer for hepatocyte targeted delivery. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2012, 38, 1039–1046.10.3109/03639045.2011.637052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Zhang CN, Wang W, Liu T, Wu YK, Guo H, Wang P, Tian Q, Wang YM, Yuan Z. Doxorubicin-loaded glycyrrhetinic acid-modified alginate nanoparticles for liver tumor chemotherapy. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 2187–2196.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[74] Benhabbour SR, Luft JC, Kim D, Jain A, Wadhwa S, Parrott MC, Liu R, DeSimone JM, Mumper RJ. In vitro and in vivo assessment of targeting lipid- based nanoparticles to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) using a novel heptameric ZEGFR domain. J. Control. Release 2012, 158, 63–71.10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.10.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[75] Milane L, Duan ZF, Amiji M. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of lonidamine/paclitaxel loaded, EGFR-targeted nanoparticles in an orthotopic animal model of multi-drug resistant breast cancer. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2017, 7, 435–444.10.1016/j.nano.2010.12.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2018-02-09
Accepted: 2018-03-28
Published Online: 2018-04-24
Published in Print: 2018-06-27

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2018-0011/html
Scroll to top button