The making of nanotechnology: exposing high-school students to behind-the-scenes of nanotechnology by inviting them to a nanotechnology conference

References

[1] Roco MC. Nanotechnology’s future. Sci. Am. 2006, 293, 39.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Jones MG, Blonder R, Gardner GE, Albe V, Falvo M, Chevrier J. Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: educational challenges. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2013, 35, 1490–1512.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ghattas NI, Carver JS. Integrating nanotechnology into school education: a review of the literature. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2012, 30, 271–284.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bryan LA, Magana A, Sederberg D. Review of published research on pre-college students’ and teachers’ nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2015, 4, 7–32.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Alford KJS, Calati F, Clarke A, Binks PN. Creating a spark for Australian science through integrated nanotechnology studies at St. Helena secondary college. J. Nano Educ. 2009, 1, 68–74.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Greenberg A. Integrating nanoscience into the classroom: perspectives on nanoscience education projects. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 762–769.Search in Google Scholar

[7] McREL: Education and Public Outreach: NanoLeap. Retrieved January 1, 2012, from: http://www.mcrel.org/nanoleap/.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Harmer AJ, Columba L. Engaging middle school students in nanoscale science, nanotechnology, and electron microscopy. J. Nano Educ. 2010, 2, 91–101.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Blonder R, Dinur M. Teaching nanotechnology using student-centered pedagogy for increasing students’ continuing motivation. J. Nano Educ. 2011, 3, 51–61.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Moosavifazel V, Kumar A, Cho HJ, Seal S. Laboratory research motivated chemistry classroom activity to promote interests among students towards science. J. Nano Educ. 2014, 6, 25–29.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Blonder R, Joselevich E, Cohen SR. Atomic force microscopy: opening the teaching laboratory to the nanoworld. J. Chem. Educ. 2010, 87, 1290–1293.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Margel H, Eylon B, Scherz Z. “We actually saw atoms with our own eyes.” Conceptions and convictions in using the scanning tunneling microscope in junior high school. J. Chem. Educ. 2004, 81, 558.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bennewitz R, Strobach N. Do you see atoms? An interdisciplinary class on atomic force microscopy and the philosophy of imaging. J. Nano Educ. 2014, 6, 30–38.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jones MG, Andre T, Superfine R, Taylor R. Learning at the nanoscale: the impact of students’ use of remote microscopy on concepts of viruses, scale, and microscopy. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2003, 40, 303–322.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jones MG, Minogue J, Tretter TR, Negishi A, Taylor R. Haptic augmentation of science instruction: does touch matter? Sci. Educ. 2006, 90, 111–123.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhong C-J, Han L, Maye MM, Luo J, Kariuki NN, Jones WE, Jr. Atomic scale imaging: a hands-on scanning probe microscopy laboratory for undergraduates. J. Chem. Educ. 2003, 80, 194.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Crone WC. Bringing nano to the public: a collaboration opportunity for researchers and museums. J. Nano Educ. 2010, 2, 102–116.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Murriello S, Contier D, Knobel M. NanoAventura: an interactive exhibition on nanoscience and nanotechnology as an educational tool. J. Nano Educ. 2009, 1, 96–105.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Belle TJ. Formal, nonformal and informal education: a holistic perspective on lifelong learning. Int. Rev. Educ. 1982, 28, 159–175.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Blonder R, Rap S. It’s a small world after all: a nanotechnology activity in a science festival. J. Nano Educ. 2013, 4, 47–56.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Avila L, Fine L, Alizadeh A, Blohm M, Buckley D, Ku A. The Columbia-GE workshop: a constructivist approach to materials science for high school students. J. Nano Educ. 2010, 2, 27–36.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Flynn L, Johnson P, Penn RL. Building a successful middle school outreach effort: microscopy camp. J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 955.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Hines PJ, Mervis J, Mccartney M, Wible B. Plenty of challenges for all. Science 2013, 340, 290–291.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Albe V. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies education. Paper presented at the 8th European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) Conference, Lyon, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Berne RW, Schummer J. Teaching societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology to engineering students through science fiction. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2005, 25, 459–468.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Schummer J. Identifying ethical issues of nanotechnologies. In Nanotechnologies, Ethics and Politics, ten Have H, Ed., UNESCO: Paris, 2007, pp. 79–98.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Sweeney AE. Social and ethical dimensions of nanoscale science and engineering research. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2006, 12, 435–464.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Stevens S, Sutherland LM, Krajcik JS. The Big Ideas of Nanoscale Science and Engineering: A Guidebook for Secondary Teachers. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Wanson S, Mason TO, Hersam MC, Drane D, Light G, Cormila R, Stevens S, Bodner G. A rubric for post-secondary degree programs in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 2009, 25, 615–627.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Huang CY, Hsu LR, Chen HC. A study on the core concepts of nanotechnology for the elementary school. J. Natl Taichung Univ.: Math. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Sakhnini S, Blonder R. Essential concepts of nanotechnology for high-school students, based on a Delphi study by the expert community. Int. J. Sci. Educ. Submitted.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Skulmoski JG, Hartman TF, Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. J. Inform. Technol. Educ. 2007, 6, 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Brooks KW. Delphi techniques: expanding applications. North Central Assoc. Q. 1979, 53, 377–385.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Hsu CC, Brian A. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 2007, 12, 1–9.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Abd-El-Khalick F, Lederman NG. The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2000, 37, 1057–1095.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Mamlok-Naaman R, Ben-Zvi R, Hofstein A, Menis J, Erduran S. Learning science through a historical approach: does it affect the attitudes of non-science-oriented students towards science? Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2005, 3, 485–507.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Kreuter J. Nanoparticles – a historical perspective. Int. J. Pharm. 2007, 331, 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Tenne R. Inorganic nanotubes and fullerene-like nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. 2006, 11, 2726–2743.Search in Google Scholar

[39] INNI. Available from: http://www.nanoisrael.org/ (retrieved 25.1.2015).Search in Google Scholar

[40] Choung RS, Locke GR, Schleck CD, Ziegenfuss JY, Beebe TJ, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ. A low response rate does not necessarily indicate non-response bias in gastroenterology survey research: a population-based study. J. Public Health 2013, 21, 87–95.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter: New York, 1967.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Glesne C. Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction, 3rd ed. Pearson Education: New York, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Chi MTH. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. J. Learn. Sci. 1997, 6, 271–315.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Blonder R, Meshulam I. Chemistry teachers introduce high-school students to advanced topics using a poster exhibition of contemporary organic chemistry. Sisyphus – J. Educ. 2014, 2, 48–73.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Blonder R, Mamlok-Naaman R, Hofstein A. Analyzing inquiry questions of high-school students in a gas chromatography open-ended laboratory experiment. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2008, 9, 250–258.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Blonder R. The story of nanomaterials in modern technology: an advanced course for chemistry teachers. J. Chem. Educ. 2011, 88, 49–52.Search in Google Scholar

[47] McAdam JE. The persistent stereotype: children’s images of scientists. Phys. Educ. 1990, 25, 102.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Mead M, Metraux R. Image of the scientist among high school students. Science 1957, 126, 384–390.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Chambers DW. Stereotypic images of the scientist: the draw-a-scientist test. Sci. Educ. 1983, 67, 255–265.Search in Google Scholar