Abstract
In this paper, we present fractional differential transform method (FDTM) and modified fractional differential transform method (MFDTM) for the solution of time fractional Black-Scholes European option pricing equation. The method finds the solution without any discretization, transformation, or restrictive assumptions with the use of appropriate initial or boundary conditions. The efficiency and exactitude of the proposed methods are tested by means of three examples.
1 Introduction
In the past few decades, financial securities became significant tools for corporates and investors. A principal problem in financial investment is the pricing of options for example, to hedge assets and portfolios in order to control the risk due to the movement in stock prices. The famous theoretical valuation formula for options derived by Fischer Black and Myron Scholes [1] in 1973. The central theoretical idea of Black and Scholes lie in the construction of a riskless portfolio taking positions in bonds (cash), option and the underlying stock. This methodology reinforces the use of the no-arbitrage principle as well. Thus, the Black-Scholes formula is used as a model for valuing European or American call and put options on a non-dividend paying stock [2]. The major difference between the European and American option is that American option can be exercised at any time up to the date while the European option can be exercised only on a specified future date. In [3–11], many researchers premeditated the existence of solutions of the Black-Scholes equation.
In recent past, the glorious developments have been envisaged in the field of fractional calculus and fractional differential equations. Differential equations involving fractional order derivatives are used to model a variety of systems, of which the important applications lie in field of viscoelasticity, electrode–electrolyte polarization, heat conduction, electromagnetic waves, diffusion equations and so on [12, 13]. Several definitions of a fractional derivative of order α > 0 [14] such as, Riemann-Liouville, Grunwald-Letnikow, Caputo and generalised functions approach. The most commonly used definitions are the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo. Readers can refer the basic definitions and properties of fractional calculus theory in [13, 14]. In recent times, fractional partial differential equation was presented further into financial theory. In [15] presented the fractional Black-Scholes equation with a time-fractional derivative to price European call option. Several fractional diffusion models of option prices in markets with jumps and priced barrier option using fractional partial differential equation given in [16]. Jumarie [17, 18] derived the time- and space-fractional Black-Scholes equations and obtained optimal fractional Merton's portfolio.
Consider the time fractional Black-Scholes equation
Subject to the conditions
where v(x, t) is the European call option price at asset price x and at time t, σ (x, t) represents the volatility function of underlying asset, r(t) is the risk free interest rate, T is the maturity and E denotes the expiration price. A wide range of research has been carried out for analytical and semi-analytical methods to study the fractional Black-Scholes equation and it plays a noticeable role in financial marketing. Due to its remarkable scope and applications in several disciplines, a considerable attention has been given to exact and numerical solutions of fractional Black-Scholes equation. Some of the methods such as Laplace transform [19], Finite difference method [20], Adomian decomposition method(ADM) [21], Homotopy perturbation method (HPM) and Homotopy analysis method(HAM) [22]. The proposed FDTM and MFDTM do not require linearization, discretization or perturbation unlike the method discussed in the literature. The main drawback of the ADM is to calculate Adomian polynomials for a nonlinear operator where the procedure is very complex. The difficulty in VIM has an inherent inaccuracy in identifying the Lagrange multiplier, correctional functional and stationary conditions for the fractional order. The disadvantage of the Homotopy perturbation method is to solve functional equation in each iteration, which is sometimes complicated and unattainable. Therefore, the proposed FDTM and MFDTM are much easier when compared with ADM, VIM and HPM.
The main aim of this paper is to extend the FDTM and MFDTM to obtain analytic and approximate solution of time fractional Black-Scholes equations. To the best of author's knowledge no paper has been reported yet for the solution of time fractional Black-Scholes equation using FDTM and MFDTM. The differential transform method obtains an analytical solution in the form of a polynomial. It is different from the traditional high order Taylor's series method, which requires symbolic competition of the necessary derivatives of the data functions. The Taylor series method is computationally taken long time for large orders. With this method, it is possible to obtain highly accurate results or exact solutions for differential equations. The use of differential transform method in electric circuit analysis was pioneered by Zhou [23]. Since then, differential transform method was successfully applied for large variety of problems such as partial differential equations [24, 25], solitary wave solutions for the KdV and mKdV equations [26], linear and nonlinear Schrodinger equations [27], linear and nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations [28], nonlinear oscillators with fractional nonlinearities [29], fractional linear and nonlinear schrodinger equation [30], nonlinear fractional Klein-Gordon Equation [31], (1+n)-dimensional Burger's equation [32], HIV infection of CD4+T cells mathematical model [33], Black-Scholes pricing model of European option valuation [34, 35] and references therein. Recently, in [36] two dimensional extended differential transform method has been used for solving the local fractional diffusion equation.
As we know that, FDTM is based on Taylor series for all variables. Even though the proposed FDTM does not require linearization, discretization or perturbation it also encounters difficulties while handling with the non-linear functions. For example, let us consider the fractional differential transform for u3(x, t) involves four summations i.e.
Thus it is necessary to have a lot of computational work to calculate such differential transform Uα,1 (k, h) for the large number of (k, h). Hence, we introduce the modified version of the standard FDTM. Instead of considering the Taylor series of u(x, t) for all variables x and t, in MFDTM, we considered the Taylor's series of the function u(x, t) with respect to the specific variable x or t. The MFDTM of u3(x, t) for the specific variable t as follows
It is observed that MFDTM of u3(x, t) involves only two summations therefore it minimizes the computation cost and effective method compared with the FDTM.
The outline of this paper is as follows. Two-dimensional FDTM are discussed in section 2. The MFDTM and its definitions presented in section 3. In section 4 applications of FDTM and MFDTM via time fractional Black-Scholes equation are given to elucidate the proposed methods. Conclusions of this work are given in section 5.
2 Two-Dimensional Fractional Differential Transform Method
Consider a function of two variables u(x, t) and suppose that it can be represented as a product of two single variable functions i.e., u(x, t) = f(x)g(t). Based on the properties of two- dimensional fractional differential transform, the function u(x, t) can be represented as
where 0 < α, Uα, 1 (k, h) is called the spectrum of u(x, t). The generalized two-dimensional fractional differential transform of the function u(x, t) is given by
where
and (5) implies that
The operations for the two-dimensional FDTM.
Original function | Transformed function |
---|---|
w(x, t) = u(x, t) ± v(x, t) | Wα, 1(k, h) = Uα, 1 (k, h) ± Vα, 1(k, h) |
w(x, t) = μu(x, t) | Wα, 1(k, h) = μUα, 1(k, h) |
Wα, 1(k, h) = (k + 1) Uα,1 (k + 1, h) | |
w(x, t) = (x – x0)m (t – t0)nα | |
w(x, t) = u2 (x, t) | |
w(x, t) = u3 (x, t) |
3 Modified Fractional Differential Transform Method
We consider the Taylor series of u(x, t) with respect to the specific variable t then, the Taylor series expansion of the function u(x, t) with respect to the specific variable t = t0 is
The modified fractional differential transform Uα, 1(x, h) of u(x, t) with respect to the variable t at t0 is defined by
The modified fractional differential inverse differential transform Uα, 1(x, h) of u(x, t) with respect to the variable t at t0 is defined by
In real application, the function u(x, t) is expressed by a finite series and eq. (10) can be written as
which means that
Since the MFDTM results from the Taylor's series of the function with respect to the specific variable it is expected that the corresponding algebraic equation from the given problem is much simpler than the result obtained by the standard FDTM. The fundamental mathematical operations performed by MFDTM are listed in Table 2.
The operations for the two-dimensional MFDTM.
Original function | Transformed function |
---|---|
w(x, t) = u(x, t) ± v(x, t) | Wα,1(x, h) = Uα, 1(x, h) ± Vα, 1(x, h) |
w(x, t) = μu(x, t) | Wα,1(x, h) = μUα,1(x, h) |
w(x, t) = (x – x0)m (t – t0)nα | Wα, 1 (x, h) = (x – x0)m δ(hα – n) |
w(x, t) = u2 (x, t) | |
w(x, t) = u3 (x, t) |
4 Applications
In this section, three examples are tested to validate the proposed FDTM and MFDTM for solving fractional Black-Scholes equation.
First consider the fractional Black-Scholes equation [11],
Subject to the initial condition
where
FDTM: The transformed version of eq. (12) is
The transformed version of eq. (13) is
Substituting eq. (15) into eq. (14), yields the Vα, 1 (m, h) values,
Using Vα, 1 (m, h) values in (5), we obtained the series solution as
MFDTM: The transformed version of eq. (12) with respect to t is
The transformed version of eq. (13) is
The MFDTM recurrence equation (17) yields the Vα, 1 (x, h) values
Substituting Vα, 1 (x, h)’s into (10), we obtained solution in the following form
where Eα (–ktα) is the Mittag-Leffler function defined as [37]. The MFDTM solution obtained in eq. (19) is same as the solution obtained in [22] and it is the exact solution of eqs. (12)–(13). It is well known from the FDTM solution in eq. (16) and MFDTM solution in eq. (19) the FDTM needs more terms in the series to obtain the exact solution. Fig. 1(a)–(d) presents the comparison of the approximate solution obtained using FDTM and MFDTM with the exact solution for different values of fractional order α for fixed t and k.

Comparison of the approximate solution obtained using FDTM and MFDTM with the exact solution.
Consider the generalized Black-Scholes equation [5]
Subject to the initial condition
FDTM: The transformed version of eq. (20) is
The transformed version of eq. (21) is
Substituting eq. (23) into eq. (22), yields the Vα, 1 (m, h) values,
Using Vα, 1 (m, h) values in (5), we obtained the series solution as
MFDTM: The transformed version of eq. (20) with respect to t is
The transformed version of eq. (21) is
The MFDTM recurrence equation (25) yields the Vα, 1 (x, h) values
Substituting Vα, 1 (m, h)’s into (10), we obtained solution in the following form
The approximate solution obtained in eq. (24) and eq. (27) is same as the solution obtained in [22]. When α = 1 eq. (24) and eq. (27) takes the following form v(x, t) = max (x–25e-0.06, 0)e0.06t + x (1–e0.06t) and
Finally, consider the following fractional Black-Scholes option pricing equation [35]
Subject to the initial condition
FDTM: The transformed version of eq. (28) is
The transformed version of eq. (29) is
Substituting eq. (31) into eq. (30), yields the Vα, 1 (m, h) values,
Using Vα, 1 (m, h) values in (5), we obtained the series solution as
MFDTM: The transformed version of eq. (28) with respect to t is
The transformed version of eq. (29) is
The MFDTM recurrence equation (33) yields the Vα, 1 (x, h) values
Substituting Vα, 1 (m, h)’s into (10), we obtained solution in the following form
The MFDTM solution obtained in eq. (35) is same as the solution obtained in [35].
Fig. 2(a–c), 3(a–c) presents the comparison of the approimate solution obtained by FDTM, MFDTM with the solution in [35] for different values of fractional order.
![Fig. 2 v(x, t) obtained by (a) FDTM, (b) MFDTM and (c) Solution in [35] when α = 1, r = 0.25, τ = 0.2, A = 1 and B = 10.}](/document/doi/10.1515/nleng-2016-0052/asset/graphic/j_nleng-2016-0052_fig_002.jpg)
v(x, t) obtained by (a) FDTM, (b) MFDTM and (c) Solution in [35] when α = 1, r = 0.25, τ = 0.2, A = 1 and B = 10.}
![Fig. 3 v(x, t) obtained by (a) FDTM, (b) MFDTM and (c) Solution in [35] when α = 0.9, r = 0.25, τ = 0.2, A = 1 and B = 10.}](/document/doi/10.1515/nleng-2016-0052/asset/graphic/j_nleng-2016-0052_fig_003.jpg)
v(x, t) obtained by (a) FDTM, (b) MFDTM and (c) Solution in [35] when α = 0.9, r = 0.25, τ = 0.2, A = 1 and B = 10.}
5 Conclusions
In this paper, we implemented the two-dimensional FDTM and MFDTM for solving time fractional Black-Scholes equation. DTM is an attractive tool for solving linear and nonlinear partial differential equations and it does not require linearization, discretization or perturbation. But it also faces some difficulties while constructing recursive equation for the function of three or more variables and it requires an expensive computational cost to solve the algebraic recursive equation. The proposed MFDTM for the specific variable can obtain the simple recursive equation. Thus it is concluded that MFDTM enhances the effectiveness of the computational work when compared with the FDTM. The proposed methods are simpler in its principles and effective in solving linear and nonlinear differential equations of fractional order and promising tool for solving wider class of nonlinear fractional models in mathematical physics and financial theory with high accuracy.
References
[1] Black F., Scholes M.S., The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 1973, 81, 637–54.10.1142/9789814759588_0001Search in Google Scholar
[2] Manale J.M., Mahomed F.M., A simple formula for valuing American and European call and put options. In: J Banasiak (Ed.). Proceeding of the Hanno Rund workshop on the differential equations. University of Natal; 2000, 210–20.Search in Google Scholar
[3] Bohner M., Zheng Y., On analytical solution of the Black-Scholes equation. Appl Math Lett 2009, 22, 309–13.10.1016/j.aml.2008.04.002Search in Google Scholar
[4] Company R., Navarro E., Pintos J.R., Ponsoda E., Numerical solution of linear and nonlinear Black-Scholes option pricing equations. Comput Math Appl 2008, 56, 813–21.10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.010Search in Google Scholar
[5] Cen Z., Le A., A robust and accurate finite difference method for a generalized Black- Scholes equation. J Comput Appl Math 2011, 235(13), 3728–733.10.1016/j.cam.2011.01.018Search in Google Scholar
[6] Company R., Lucas J., Pintos J.R., A numerical method for European Option Pricing with transaction costs nonlinear equation. Math Comput Modelling 2009, 50(5–6), 910–20.10.1016/j.mcm.2009.05.019Search in Google Scholar
[7] Fabiao F., Grossinho M.R., Simoes O.A., Positive solutions of a Dirichlet problem for a stationary nonlinear Black Scholes equation. Nonlinear Anal Theor 2009, 71(10), 4624–31.10.1016/j.na.2009.03.026Search in Google Scholar
[8] Amster P., Averbuj C.G., Mariani M.C., Solutions to a stationary nonlinear Black- Scholes type equation. J Math Anal Appl 2002, 276(1), 231–38.10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00434-1Search in Google Scholar
[9] Amster P, Averbuj CG, Mariani MC. Stationary solutions for two nonlinear Black--Scholes type equations. Appl Numer Math 2003, 47(3–4), 275–80.10.1016/S0168-9274(03)00070-9Search in Google Scholar
[10] Ankudinova J., Ehrhardt M., On the numerical solution of nonlinear Black--Scholes Equations. Comput Math Appl 2008, 56(3), 799–812.10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.005Search in Google Scholar
[11] Gülkac V., The homotopy perturbation method for the Black-Scholes equation. J Statist Comput Simulation 2010, 80(12), 1349–54.10.1080/00949650903074603Search in Google Scholar
[12] Hilfer R., Applications of fractional calculus in physics. Word Scientific Company, Singapore, 2000.10.1142/3779Search in Google Scholar
[13] Caputo M., Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent: part II. J R Aust Soc 1967, 13(5), 529–39.10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.xSearch in Google Scholar
[14] Podlubny I., Fractional differential equations. San Diego: Academic Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
[15] Wyss W., The fractional Black-Scholes equation. Fract Calc Appl Anal 2000, 3(3), 51–61.Search in Google Scholar
[16] Cartea A., Del-Castillo-Negrete D., Fractional diffusion models of option prices in markets with jumps. Physica A 2007, 374(2), 749–63.10.1016/j.physa.2006.08.071Search in Google Scholar
[17] Jumarie G., Stock exchange fractional dynamics defined as fractional exponential growth driven by (usual) Gaussian white noise. Application to fractional Black-Scholes equations, Insurance: Mathematics&Economics, 2008, 42(1), 271–87.10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.03.001Search in Google Scholar
[18] Jumarie G., Derivation and solutions of some fractional Black-Scholes equations in coarse-grained space and time. Application to Merton’s optimal portfolio. Comput Math Appl 2010, 59(3), 1142–64.10.1016/j.camwa.2009.05.015Search in Google Scholar
[19] Sunil Kumar, Yildirim A., Khan Y., Jafari H., Sayevand K., Wei L., Analytical solution of fractional Black-Scholes European option pricing equation by using Laplace transform. J Fract Calc Appl 2012, 2(8), 1–9.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Song L., Wang W., Solution of the fractional Black-Scholes option pricing model by finite difference method. Abstr Appl Anal 2013, 2013, Article ID 194286, 10 pages.10.1155/2013/194286Search in Google Scholar
[21] Ghandehari M.A.M., Ranjbar M., European option pricing of fractional version of the BlackScholes Model: Approach via Expansion in series. Int J Nonlinear Sci 2014, 17(2), 105–10.Search in Google Scholar
[22] Sunil Kumar, Devendra Kumar, Jagdev Singh, Numerical computation of fractional Black-Scholes equation arising in financial Market. Egyptian J Basic Appl Sci 2014, 1(3-4), 177–83.10.1016/j.ejbas.2014.10.003Search in Google Scholar
[23] Zhou J.K., Differential transformation and its applications for electrical circuits. Wuhan: Huazhong University Press,1986.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Chen C.K., Ho S.H., Solving partial differential equations by two-dimensional differential transform method. Appl Math Comput 1999; 106:171–79.Search in Google Scholar
[25] Jang M.J., Chen C.L., Liu Y.C., Two-dimensional differential transform for partial differential equations. Appl Math Comput 2001, 121, 261–70.10.1016/S0096-3003(99)00293-3Search in Google Scholar
[26] Figen Kangalgil O., Ayaz F., Solitary wave solutions for the KdV and mKdV equations by differential transform method. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009; 41(1):464–72.10.1016/j.chaos.2008.02.009Search in Google Scholar
[27] Ravi Kanth A.S.V., Aruna K., Two-dimensional differential transform method for solving linear and non-linear Schrodinger equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2009; 41:2277–81.10.1016/j.chaos.2008.08.037Search in Google Scholar
[28] Ravi Kanth A.S.V., Aruna K., Differential transform method for solving the linear and nonlinear Klein--Gordon equation. Comput Phys Commun 2009, 180, 708–11.10.1016/j.cpc.2008.11.012Search in Google Scholar
[29] Ebaid A.E., A reliable after treatment for improving the differential transformation method and its application to nonlinear oscillators with fractional nonlinearities. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 2011, 16,528–36.10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.03.012Search in Google Scholar
[30] Aruna K., Ravi Kanth A.S.V., Approximate solutions of Non-linear Fractional Schrodinger Equation Via Differential Transform method and Modified Differential Transform Method, Nat Acad Sci Lett 2013, 36(2), 201–13.10.1007/s40009-013-0119-1Search in Google Scholar
[31] Aruna K., Ravi Kanth A.S.V., Two-Dimensional Differential Transform Method and Modified Differential Transform Method for Solving Nonlinear Fractional Klein-Gordon Equation, Nat Acad Sci Lett 2014, 37(2), 163–71.10.1007/s40009-013-0209-0Search in Google Scholar
[32] Srivastava V.K., Mishra N., Kumar S., Singh B.K., Awasthi M.K., Reduced differential transform method for solving (1 + n)–Dimensional Burgers’ equation,, Egypt J Basic Appl sci 2014, 1(2), 115–19.10.1016/j.ejbas.2014.05.001Search in Google Scholar
[33] Srivastava V.K., Awasthi M.K., Kumar S., Numerical approximation for HIV infection of CD4+ T cells mathematical model, Ain Shams Eng J 2014, 5(2), 625–29.10.1016/j.asej.2013.12.012Search in Google Scholar
[34] Aghajani H., Ebadattalab M., Jafar H., Kahsaari H., The reduced differential transform method for the Black-Scholes pricing model of European option valuation. Int J Advn Appl Math Mech 2015, 3(1), 135–38.Search in Google Scholar
[35] Akrami M.H., Erjaee G.H., Examples of analytical solutions by means of MittagLeffler function of fractional BlackScholes option pricing equation, Fract Calc Appl Anal 2015, 18(1), 38-47.10.1515/fca-2015-0004Search in Google Scholar
[36] XiaoJun Yang, Tenreiro Machado J.A., Srivastava H.M., A new numerical technique for solving the local fractional diffusion equation: Two-dimensional extended differential transform approach, Appl Math Comput 2016, 274, 143–51.10.1016/j.amc.2015.10.072Search in Google Scholar
[37] Mittag-Leffler G.M., Sopra la funzione Eα(x). Rend. Acad Lincei 1904, 13(5), 3–5.Search in Google Scholar
© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Articles
- Rates of subsidence and relative sea level rise in the Hawaii Islands
- Research Article
- Residual power series method for fractional Burger types equations
- Research Article
- Linearized Implicit Numerical Method for Burgers’ Equation
- Research Article
- Mixed convection flow of couple stress fluid between rotating discs with chemical reaction and double diffusion effects
- Research Article
- Chaos Suppression in Fractional Order Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor and PI controlled Induction motor by Extended Back stepping Control
- Research Article
- A fractional model of a dynamical Brusselator reaction-diffusion system arising in triple collision and enzymatic reactions
- Research Article
- Solution of time fractional Black-Scholes European option pricing equation arising in financial market
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Articles
- Rates of subsidence and relative sea level rise in the Hawaii Islands
- Research Article
- Residual power series method for fractional Burger types equations
- Research Article
- Linearized Implicit Numerical Method for Burgers’ Equation
- Research Article
- Mixed convection flow of couple stress fluid between rotating discs with chemical reaction and double diffusion effects
- Research Article
- Chaos Suppression in Fractional Order Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor and PI controlled Induction motor by Extended Back stepping Control
- Research Article
- A fractional model of a dynamical Brusselator reaction-diffusion system arising in triple collision and enzymatic reactions
- Research Article
- Solution of time fractional Black-Scholes European option pricing equation arising in financial market