Home Thinking Planetary About Global Futures: Posthuman Cosmopolitanism
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Thinking Planetary About Global Futures: Posthuman Cosmopolitanism

  • Ilaria W. Biano ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 8, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The link between the global condition and planetary thinking is a crucial one when thinking about the future. Positing itself in the context of future-oriented history and posthumanist and planetary thinking, the essay reflects on a central concept of global thought such as cosmopolitanism, theorizing the possibility of a posthuman cosmopolitanism. Built on concepts such as multiple modernities and secularities, philosophical posthumanism, and non-anthropocentric history, posthuman cosmopolitanism is primarily future-focused, globally rooted, and planetary oriented. Specifically, by proposing as a case study of a sort a posthumanist approach to a rethinking of cosmopolitanism, the essay emphasizes how thinking planetary and in a posthumanist and post-anthropocentric way does not entail, as it may be assumed, a relativization and loss of relevance of “the human” per se, but a more complex web of intra-active relations. By building on the work of authors such as Braidotti, Domanska, Chakrabarty, Simon, and Latour, the essay proposes an original reflection, engaging with a crucial issue such as how to think about a global future that focuses on globality as the product of interconnected, multiple processes and constantly shifting interrelations between human and non-human forces.


Corresponding author: Ilaria W. Biano, Independent scholar, Turin, Italy, E-mail:

References

Beck, U. 2016. The Metamorphosis of the World: How Climate Change is Transforming Our Concept of the World. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Block, K. 2022. “The Anthropocene as a Challenge for Sociological Thinking in Planetary Dimensions.” Die Erde – Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin 153 (3): 188–97.Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. 2008. “In Spite of the Times.” Theory, Culture & Society 25 (6): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408095542.Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. 2013a. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. 2013b. “Becoming-World.” In After Cosmopolitanism, edited by R. Braidotti, P. Hanafin, and B. Blaagaard, 8–27. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. 2020. “Preface: The Posthuman as Exuberant Excess.” In Philosophical Posthumanism, edited by F. Ferrando, xi–xvi. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R., R. Dolphijn, and I. Van Der Tuin. 2012. “Interview with Rosi Braidotti.” In New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies, edited by R. Dolphijn, and I. Van Der Tuin, 19–37. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.10.3998/ohp.11515701.0001.001Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R., P. Hanafin, and B. Blaagaard. 2013. After Cosmopolitanism. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203102121Search in Google Scholar

Casanova, J. 2011. “Cosmopolitanism, the Clash of Civilizations and Multiple Modernities.” Current Sociology 59 (2): 252–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392110391162.Search in Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, D. 2018. “Anthropocene Time.” History and Theory 57 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12044.Search in Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, D. 2021. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226733050.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Childs, P., and J. Green. 2013. Aesthetics and Ethics in Twenty-First Century British Novels: Zadie Smith, Nadeem Aslam, Hari Kunzru and David Mitchell. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Delanty, G., and A. Mota. 2017. “Governing the Anthropocene.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1): 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016668535.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, S. N. 1993. “Globalization, Civilizational Traditions and Multiple Modernities.” In Regime Transformation and Global Realignments: Indo-European Dialogues on the Post-Cold War, edited by K. Ahuja, H. Coppens, and H. Van der Wusten. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Elias, A. J., and C. Moraru. 2015. The Planetary Turn: Relationality and Geoaesthetics in the Twenty-First Century. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctv3znz1sSearch in Google Scholar

Ferrando, F. 2019. Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350059511Search in Google Scholar

Gilroy, P. 2000. Against Race: Imagining Political Culture Beyond the Color Line. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gilroy, P. 2005. Postcolonial Melancholia. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hayles, N. K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Herbrechter, S. 2022. “Posthumanism and Deep Time.” In Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism, edited by S. Herbrechter, and I. Callus, 1–26. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-42681-1_26-1Search in Google Scholar

Hollinger, V. 2020. “Historicizing Posthumanism.” In After the Human. Culture, Theory, and Criticism in the 21st Century, edited by S. Vint, 15–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108874427.002Search in Google Scholar

Hui, Y. 2020. “For a Planetary Thinking.” E-Flux Journal 114 (December 2020). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/114/366703/for-a-planetary-thinking/.Search in Google Scholar

Huntington, S. P. 1993. “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 22–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045621.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B. 2021. After Lockdown: A Metamorphosis. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B., and D. Chakrabarty. 2020. “Conflicts of Planetary Proportion – A Conversation.” Journal of the Philosophy of History 14: 419–54. https://doi.org/10.1163/18722636-12341450.Search in Google Scholar

Mazzei, L. A. 2020. “Postqualitative Inquiry: Or the Necessity of Theory.” Qualitative Inquiry 27 (2): 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420932607.Search in Google Scholar

Mendieta, E. 2018. “Interspecies Cosmopolitanism.” In Routledge International Handbook of Cosmopolitanism Studies, edited by G. Delanty, 254–66. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351028905-23Search in Google Scholar

Önnerfors, A. 2012. “Cosmopolitanism.” In Encyclopedia of Global Studies, edited by H. K. Anheier, and M. Juergensmeyer, 303–7. Los Angeles: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, K. 2008. “Affirming Complexity: ‘White Teeth’ and Cosmopolitanism.” Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 9 (2): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/41210294.Search in Google Scholar

Rolf, J. N. 2022. “Both/And or Neither/Nor? On the Prospect of ‘New Cosmopolitanism’ to Serve as a Middle Ground between Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism.” Global Studies Quarterly 2 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac015.Search in Google Scholar

Schoene, B. 2010. The Cosmopolitan Novel. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shields, C. M. 2012. Transformative Leadership in Education: Equitable Change in an Uncertain and Complex World. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, Z. B. 2019. History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350095083Search in Google Scholar

Simon, Z. B. 2020. The Epochal Event: Transformations in the Entangled Human, Technological, and Natural Worlds. Cham: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-47805-6Search in Google Scholar

Simon, Z. B., and M. Tamm. 2021. “Historical Futures.” History and Theory 60 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12190.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, Z. B., M. Tamm, and E. Domańska. 2021. “Anthropocenic Historical Knowledge: Promises and Pitfalls.” Rethinking History 25 (4): 406–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2021.1985224.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Z. 2000. White Teeth: A Novel. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, H. 2012. “A Posthuman Cosmopolitanism and New Media Writing.” Hyperrhiz 9, https://doi.org/10.20415/hyp/009.e01. http://hyperrhiz.io/hyperrhiz09/essays/a-posthuman-cosmopolitanism-and-new-media-writing.html.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Z. 2014. “Elegy for a Country’s Seasons.” New York Review of Books April 3. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/04/03/elegy-countrys-seasons/.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, R. 2010 “Cosmopolitan Criticism.” In Re-Routing the Postcolonial: New Directions for the New Millennium, edited by J. M. Wilson, C. Sandru, and S. Lawson Welsh, 36–47. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tamm, M. 2022. “Future-Oriented History.” In Historical Understanding: Past, Present and Future, edited by Z. B. Simon, and L. Deile, 131–40. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350168640.ch-011Search in Google Scholar

Trepanier, L., and K. M. Habib. 2011. Cosmopolitanism in the Age of Globalization: Citizens without States. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Search in Google Scholar

Ulmer, J. B. 2017. “Posthumanism as Research Methodology: Inquiry in the Anthropocene.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 30 (9): 832–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1336806.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-10
Accepted: 2024-03-10
Published Online: 2024-04-08

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ngs-2024-0012/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button