Home EU Finalité Conceptions After Brexit: A Comparison of Polish and German Parties
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

EU Finalité Conceptions After Brexit: A Comparison of Polish and German Parties

  • Thomas Mehlhausen , Adrian Wagstyl , Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski EMAIL logo and Robert Grzeszczak
Published/Copyright: February 15, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The future of the EU as a laboratory of a transnational community of nations within an increasingly split global community of actors could become ever more relevant, the more the global future of democracy needs transnational cooperation among differently structured democracies. Yet the reality on the ground is complex in the heartland of the respective experimentation as well. Against this backdrop, the article deals with deepening and differentiation of European integration through the prism of two cases: Germany and Poland. While the former is the most populous among fully integrated EU member states, the latter is by now the biggest partially integrated member state having not yet joined the Eurozone, nor showing any inclination to do so in the future. These countries differ in many respects, to name just the Eurozone, defense matters, rule of law, and migration. And yet, in the eyes of some observers, close German-Polish cooperation is just as essential for the future of Europe as the Franco-German partnership. In this sense, the comparison of Poland and Germany promises to unveil problématiques typical for the entire EU, in particular with regard to differentiated integration.


Corresponding author: Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany, E-mail:

Funding source: German-Polish Science Foundation

Acknowledgments

This article is part of the research project “Germany and Poland in a Differentiated European Union” funded by the German–Polish Science Foundation.

References

Aumer, P. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 21 February, 19th Election Period.” 9774.Search in Google Scholar

Baerbock, A. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 23 March, 18th Election Period.” 22547–8.Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, R. S., S. Joll, and J. Polk. 2017. “Complexity in the European Party Space: Exploring Dimensionality with Experts.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 219–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512436995.Search in Google Scholar

Beer, N. 2022. “Interview with the Authors, 25 January.”Search in Google Scholar

Bischoff, G. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 30 August.”Search in Google Scholar

Boehringer, P. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 13 December, 19th Election Period.” 415–6.Search in Google Scholar

Brady, H. E., and D. Collier. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Brinkhaus, R. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 13 December, 19th Election Period.” 413.Search in Google Scholar

Bulmer, S., and W. E. Paterson. 2013. “Germany as the EU’s Reluctant Hegemon? Of Economic Strength and Political Constraints.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (10): 1387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.822824.Search in Google Scholar

Ceglarz, A. 2021. “Untapped Horizons and Prevailing Domestic Beliefs: Bilateral Climate and Energy Relations from a Polish Perspective.” In Poland and Germany in the European Union. The Multidimensional Dynamics of Bilateral Relations, edited by E. Opilowska, and M. Sus, 167–85. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003046622-12Search in Google Scholar

Cheneval, F. 2008. “Multilateral Democracy: The Original Position.” Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (1): 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00410.x.Search in Google Scholar

Cheneval, F., and F. Schimmelfennig. 2013. “The Case for Democracy in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (2): 334–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02262.x.Search in Google Scholar

Czaputowicz, J. 2018. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 21 March, 8th Election Period.” 82–6.Search in Google Scholar

Dehm, D. 2018. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 7 June, 19th Election Period.” 3473.Search in Google Scholar

Dehm, D. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 13 December, 19th Election Period.” 16893–4.Search in Google Scholar

Długi, W. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 9 February, 8th Election Period.” 130–1.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrindt, A. 2018. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 28 June, 19th Election Period.” 4125.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrindt, A. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 21 March, 19th Election Period.” 10498.Search in Google Scholar

Duszczyk, M. 2021. “Migration: An Axis of Dispute or a Potential Point of Enhanced Cooperation?” In Poland and Germany in the European Union. The Multidimensional Dynamics of Bilateral Relations, edited by E. Opilowska, and M. Sus, 149–66. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003046622-11Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2017. “White Paper on the Future of Europe: Reflections and Scenarios for the EU27 by 2025.” Brussels: EU Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/66626.Search in Google Scholar

Fabbrini, S., and T. Zgaga. 2022. “Sovereignism and its Implication: The Differentiated Disintegration of the European Union.” EU3D Research Papers 22.10.2139/ssrn.4118801Search in Google Scholar

FDP. 2019. “Die deutsch-französische Partnerschaft stärken – Die Zukunft gestalten.” Drucksache 19 (2535): 6.Search in Google Scholar

Frei, T. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 23 March, 18th Election Period.” 22539.Search in Google Scholar

Gauland, A. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 17 January, 19th Election Period.” 8630.Search in Google Scholar

Gill-Piątek, H. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 23 September”.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. C., A. Brosius, and C. H. de Vreese. 2022. “Policy Responsibility in the Multilevel EU Structure – The (Non-) Effect of Media Reporting on Citizens’ Responsibility Attribution across Four Policy Areas.” Journal of European Integration 44 (3): 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1863959.Search in Google Scholar

Göring-Eckardt, K. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 27 April, 18th Election Period.” 23188–9.Search in Google Scholar

Grötsch, U. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 13 December, 19th Election Period.” 41.Search in Google Scholar

Guidi, M., I. Guardiancich, and D. Levi-Faur. 2020. “Modes of Regulatory Governance: A Political Economy Perspective.” Governance 33 (1): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12479.Search in Google Scholar

Grzeszczak, R. 2018. Renationalisation of the Integration Process in the Internal Market of the European Union. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.10.5771/9783845283791Search in Google Scholar

Grzeszczak, R., and I. P. Karolewski. 2012. The Multilevel and Poly-Centric European Union: Legal and Political Studies. Münster: LIT.Search in Google Scholar

Gysi, G. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 20 January, 18th Election Period.” 21349–50.Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, F. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 12 December, 19th Election Period.” 267–8.Search in Google Scholar

Hebner, M. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 12 December, 19th Election Period.” 266.Search in Google Scholar

Hetman, K. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 14 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Hirte, H. 2018. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 7 June, 19th Election Period.” 3476.Search in Google Scholar

Hofreiter, A. 2018. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 21 November, 19th Election Period.” 7314.Search in Google Scholar

Jokisch, R. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 16 August.”Search in Google Scholar

Kahrs, J. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 13 December, 19th Election Period.” 414–5.Search in Google Scholar

Kaleta, S. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 14 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Karolewski, I. P., and M. Olejnik. 2020. “Threatening or Benevolent Hegemon? How Polish Political Elites Frame Their Discourse on ‘German Hegemony’.” German Politics and Society 38 (3): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2020.380305.Search in Google Scholar

Karski, K. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 9 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Kirch, A.-L., and M. Sus. 2021. “Polish–German Cooperation in Security and Defence: Falling Short of Potential or Doomed to be Fragile?” In Poland and Germany in the European Union. The Multidimensional Dynamics of Bilateral Relations, edited by E. Opilowska, and M. Sus, 93–111. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003046622-8Search in Google Scholar

Kitschelt, H. 1994. “Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions.” Party Politics 1 (4): 447–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001004002.Search in Google Scholar

Kleinwächter, N. 2018. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 7 June, 19th Election Period.” 3468.Search in Google Scholar

Kleinwächter, N. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 10 October.”Search in Google Scholar

Kloc, I. 2016. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 21 July, 8th Election Period.” 351–2.Search in Google Scholar

Kohler-Koch, B., and M. Jachtenfuchs. 1996. “Regieren im dynamischen Mehrebenensystem.” In Europäische Integration, edited by B. Kohler-Koch, and M. Jachtenfuchs, 15–44. Opladen: Leske and Budrich.10.1007/978-3-663-10001-0_1Search in Google Scholar

Konieczny, M. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 8 September.”Search in Google Scholar

Kuhs, J. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 23 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Lagodinsky, S. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 23 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Leruth, B., and C. Lord. 2015. “Differentiated Integration in the European Union: A Concept, a Process, a System or a Theory?” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 754–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1021196.Search in Google Scholar

Leruth, B., S. Gänzle, and J. Trondal. 2019. “Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in the EU After Brexit: Risks Versus Opportunities.” Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (6): 1383–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12957.Search in Google Scholar

Lindner, C. 2018. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 22 January, 19th Election Period.” 692–3.Search in Google Scholar

Marks, G., L. Hooghe, M. Nelson, and E. Edwards. 2006. “Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West. Different Structure, Same Causality.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 155–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005281932.Search in Google Scholar

Mayring, P. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz GmbH.10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42Search in Google Scholar

Mayring, P. 2019. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Demarcation, Varieties, Developments.” Forum for Qualitative Social Research 20 (3).Search in Google Scholar

Mauerer, F. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 1 December.”Search in Google Scholar

Mehlhausen, T. 2015. European Union Enlargement. Material Interests, Community Norms and Anomie. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315707259Search in Google Scholar

Nietan, D. 2021. “Interview on 16.8.2021.”10.22233/20412495.1021.16Search in Google Scholar

Ociepa, M. 2021. “Interview with the Authors. 14 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Olbrycht, J. 2021. “Interview with the Authors. 24 August.”Search in Google Scholar

Paterson, W. E. 2011. “The Reluctant Hegemon? Germany Moves Centre Stage in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review 49: 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02184.x.Search in Google Scholar

Petry, C. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 22 June, 18th Election Period.” 24548.Search in Google Scholar

Plociennik, S. 2021. “Poland’s Reserved Approach to the Euro: Does Germany Matter?” In Poland and Germany in the European Union. The Multidimensional Dynamics of Bilateral Relations, edited by E. Opilowska, and M. Sus, 112–29. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003046622-9Search in Google Scholar

Ploß, C. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 13 December, 19th Election Period.” 16895.Search in Google Scholar

Protasiewicz, J. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 9 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Rosati, D. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 9 August.”Search in Google Scholar

Roth, M. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 23 March, 18th Election Period.” 22543.Search in Google Scholar

Roth, M. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 15 March, 19th Election Period.” 10294–5.Search in Google Scholar

Scharpf, F. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schäuble, W., and K. Lamers. 1994. “Reflections on European Policy, Bonn, CDU/CSU.” 1 September, reprinted. In A German Agenda for the European Union, edited by K. Lamers, 11–24. London: Federal Trust for Education and Research/Konrad Adenauer Foundation.Search in Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, F., D. Leuffen, and B. Rittberger. 2015. “The European Union as a System of Differentiated Integration: Interdependence, Politicization and Differentiation.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 764–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835.Search in Google Scholar

Scholz, H. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 31 August.”Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, R. 2022. “Democracy in Europe: Some Preliminary Thoughts.” European Law Review 1: 24–51.Search in Google Scholar

Siekierski, C. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 8 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Simon, S. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 7 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Śmiszek, K. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 19 July.”Search in Google Scholar

Sośnierz, D. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 23 August.”Search in Google Scholar

Strengmann-Kuhn, W. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 20 January, 19th Election Period.” 21355.Search in Google Scholar

Stubb, A. 1996. “A Categorization of Differentiated Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (2): 283–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00573.x.Search in Google Scholar

Święcicki, M. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 14 March, 8th Election Period.” 191–2.Search in Google Scholar

Szłapka, A. 2017. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 9 February, 8th Election Period.” 143.Search in Google Scholar

Ulrich, A. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 17 January, 19th Election Period.” 8634.Search in Google Scholar

Ullrich, G. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 26 August.”Search in Google Scholar

Wagener, R. 2021. “Interview with the Authors, 22 December.”Search in Google Scholar

Weber, M. 1951 [1904]. “Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis.” In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. 2nd ed., 146–214. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Search in Google Scholar

Weidel, A. 2019. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 21 March, 19th Election Period.” 10496.Search in Google Scholar

Winnicki, R. 2016. “Statement in the Plenary Debate, 21 July, 8th Election Period.” 362–7.Search in Google Scholar

Yoder, J. 2018. “Good Neighbourliness in a Tense Neighbourhood: German-Polish Relations, 1990 to the Ukraine Crisis.” German Politics 27 (4): 555–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2018.1429409.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-11
Accepted: 2023-12-10
Published Online: 2024-02-15

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ngs-2023-0034/html
Scroll to top button