Home Ultrasensitive circular dichroism spectroscopy based on coupled quasi-bound states in the continuum
Article Open Access

Ultrasensitive circular dichroism spectroscopy based on coupled quasi-bound states in the continuum

  • Tingting Guan , Zhenyu Wang , Ruize Wang , Zihan Wu , Chaowei Wang EMAIL logo , Dong Wu , Jiaru Chu and Yang Chen ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 17, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is essential for biochemistry, structural biology and pharmaceutical chemistry. While the chiroptical properties of chiral molecules are characterized by the Pasteur parameter κ, it is commonly conceived that the generation of CD is solely attributed to the imaginary part κ′′. However, since the imaginary part κ′′ is orders of magnitude smaller than the real part κ′ for most chiral molecules, the achievable sensitivity of CD spectroscopy is quite limited. Here, we report a recipe for realizing ultrasensitive CD spectroscopy based on the κ′ component of chiral molecules. Two quasi-bound states in the continuum are coupled by chiral molecules to form two hybridized branches, whose wavelengths and eigenpolarizations are very sensitive to the value of κ′. Giant CD signals over four orders of magnitude larger than the case without mode coupling are thus produced, paving the way towards chiral structure analysis at the single molecule level.

1 Introduction

Chirality is essential for life [1]. An overwhelming majority of chemically and biologically active molecules are chiral, such as proteins, DNAs and sugars. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is a fundamental tool for investigating chiral molecules [2], [3], [4], [5], which can be harnessed for deriving the structural information of molecules and discriminating chiral molecules of opposite handedness, i.e., enantiomers. It measures the difference in absorption of right- and left-handed circularly polarized (RCP and LCP) light by chiral molecules. Generally, the chiroptical responses of molecules are characterized by the complex-valued Pasteur parameter κ = κ′ + ′′, and only the imaginary part κ′′ is responsible for the generation of CD signals [4], [5]. However, while the κ value of natural chiral molecules is typically quite small due to the scale mismatch between the light wavelength and the molecular wavefunction, their imaginary part κ′′ is even much smaller than the real part κ′ (κ″ ≪ κ′) [6], [7], resulting in the obtained CD signals extremely weak. In order to amplify CD signals to a measurable level, molecule solutions with high concentration and large volume have to be prepared, which inherently limits the sensitivity of CD spectroscopy to achieve the ultimate goal of single molecule detection.

Recently, it is uncovered that the amplitude of CD is also related to the optical helicity density at the location of the molecule, which is quantified by C = ε 0 ω 2 I m E * B [8]. A general equation is thus derived: C D = A R A L = 4 ε 0 κ C , where A R and A L are the absorption of RCP and LCP light, and ɛ 0 is the permittivity of free space. As guided by this relationship, artificial nanostructures supporting superchiral fields of large C have been extensively proposed for boosting the sensitivity of CD spectroscopy [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], but their achievable sensitivity is still limited by the extremely small value of κ″. On the other hand, although the real part κ′ of chiral molecules can be over two orders of magnitude larger than κ″, it is still unclear how to harness κ′ for realizing sensitive CD spectroscopy.

In this work, we demonstrate a new strategy to achieve ultrasensitive CD spectroscopy based on the real component κ′, rather than the imaginary component κ′′. The physics of bound state in the continuum (BIC), that has recently been utilized in photonics for realizing and engineering high-Q resonances [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], is harnessed as a workhorse for enhancing chiral light–matter interactions. Through delicate design of a photonic crystal slab (PCS), two quasi-BICs are coupled by chiral molecules to form two hybridized branches, whose wavelengths and eigenpolarizations are strongly dependent on the value of κ′. Giant CD signals over four orders of magnitude larger than the case without the PCS are then produced, which has never been realized before and can serve as an ultrasensitive tool for analyzing enantiomers.

2 Paradigmatic system design

Figure 1a illustrates a paradigmatic system for leveraging the real component κ′ of chiral molecules in CD spectroscopy. A PCS composed of arrayed nanoholes inside a dielectric slab (n = 2.3) is positioned on a substrate (n = 1.45), and covered by a solution with a permittivity of ɛ r = 2.1 + 9i × 10−5 and a permeability of μ r = 1 + 4i × 10−5. A set of design principles are implemented. First, the structure itself should be achiral to make sure that the acquired CD signals are exclusively originated from chiral molecules, without the disturbance from the CD responses of chiral structures. Second, the associated resonances should be helicity-preserved over the volume. Otherwise, CD signals coming from different locations could be oppositely signed and cancel each other in the far field. Third, high-Q resonances with strong field enhancement and localization are desired to enhance light–matter interactions.

Figure 1: 
Metasurface design. (a) Schematic of the paradigmatic system for κ′-based CD spectroscopy. The geometric parameters are: period p = 400 nm, radius r = 140 nm, perturbation Δ = 50 nm, and thickness t = 133.8 nm. (b) Calculated bandstructure of the PCS with a series of quasi-BICs occurring at the Γ point. (c) Electric and magnetic field distributions of the TM1 and TE4 quasi-BICs exhibiting electromagnetic duality. (d) Simulated transmission spectra of the PCS under RCP incidence for different slab thickness t. (e) Simulated optical helicity density C distributions of the PCS (t = 133.8 nm) under RCP (left) and LCP (right) incidence at the cross-sectional x-y plane (top) and y-z plane (bottom), which are normalized by the reference C value of free-space RCP light.
Figure 1:

Metasurface design. (a) Schematic of the paradigmatic system for κ′-based CD spectroscopy. The geometric parameters are: period p = 400 nm, radius r = 140 nm, perturbation Δ = 50 nm, and thickness t = 133.8 nm. (b) Calculated bandstructure of the PCS with a series of quasi-BICs occurring at the Γ point. (c) Electric and magnetic field distributions of the TM1 and TE4 quasi-BICs exhibiting electromagnetic duality. (d) Simulated transmission spectra of the PCS under RCP incidence for different slab thickness t. (e) Simulated optical helicity density C distributions of the PCS (t = 133.8 nm) under RCP (left) and LCP (right) incidence at the cross-sectional x-y plane (top) and y-z plane (bottom), which are normalized by the reference C value of free-space RCP light.

With respect to our proposed PCS, perturbative notches Δ are introduced to break the C 2 z symmetry of circular nanoholes, so that those symmetry-protected nonradiative BICs at the Γ point are converted to high-Q quasi-BICs (Figure 1b). Meanwhile, the structure still maintains the mirror symmetry of y-z plane to be achiral. To construct helicity-preserved resonances, the TM1 and TE4 quasi-BICs are utilized for their electromagnetic duality [20], [31], meaning that the electric field distributions of TM1 mode resemble the magnetic field distributions of TE4 mode and vice versa (Figure 1c). Then, these two modes are made degenerate at the Γ point by finely tuning the thickness of PCS, which can be realized in fabrication through atomic layer deposition (ALD). We simulate the transmission spectra of the PCS under normal incidence of RCP light for different thickness t, as shown in Figure 1d. two sharp resonances are observed for t = 132.8 nm, corresponding to TM1 and TE4 quasi-BICs, respectively. When the thickness t is increased, the two resonances approach each other, merge into one dip, and then separate again, but their relative positions are exchanged. For the case of degeneracy at t = 133.8 nm, the optical helicity density C in the near field maintains positive and negative for RCP and LCP incidence respectively (Figure 1e), validating the realization of helicity preservation. Moreover, the absolute value of C can be enhanced by over five orders of magnitude when compared to that of free-space circularly polarized light, which lays the foundation for strong chiral light–matter interactions.

3 Results of CD spectroscopy

Next, we introduce chiral molecules into the solution to enable a nonzero κ. The initial Pasteur parameter is set to κ 0 = 2 + 0.02 × 1 0 4 , exhibiting a realistically low magnitude and containing a typical ratio between the real and imaginary part [6], [7]. The nonzero κ induces magnetoelectric interactions in the Maxwell equations, so that the two originally orthogonal modes, TM1 and TE4 quasi-BICs, can now couple with each other, forming two hybridized branches, i.e., upper branch (UB) and lower branch (LB). The Hamiltonian H of the coupled system is written as [14]:

(1) H = ω 1 i A κ ω 2 i A κ ω 1 ω 2 ,

where ω 1 and ω 2 are the frequencies of TM1 and TE4 quasi-BICs, A is a real-valued parameter associated with the field overlapping of the two modes. In our case, since κ″ ≪ κ′, Eq. (1) can be approximated to:

(2) H = ω 1 i A κ ω 2 i A κ ω 1 ω 2 ,

which exhibits a typical anti-parity-time (anti-PT) symmetry at zero detuning ω 1 = ω 2. As a result, the two hybridized resonances possess the same wavelength before the exceptional point (EP), as shown in Figure 2a. Beyond the EP, their wavelengths are split and approximately follow linear relationships with κ′, while almost have no dependence on the value of κ″.

Figure 2: 
Coupling between two bound states in the continuum. (a, b) Wavelengths of UB and LB (a) and their radiative elliptical angles (b) as functions of the real and imaginary part of κ, which are normalized by κ
0. The evolution of radiative eigenpolarizations is indicated in (b), where the red color and blue color indicate right-handed and left-handed elliptical polarization, respectively. (c, d) Retrieved coupling coefficients a

j
 for LB (c) and UB (d) as functions of κ, where the contributions of real and imaginary part are considered separately. a
1(2) corresponds to TM1 (TE4) quasi-BIC.
Figure 2:

Coupling between two bound states in the continuum. (a, b) Wavelengths of UB and LB (a) and their radiative elliptical angles (b) as functions of the real and imaginary part of κ, which are normalized by κ 0. The evolution of radiative eigenpolarizations is indicated in (b), where the red color and blue color indicate right-handed and left-handed elliptical polarization, respectively. (c, d) Retrieved coupling coefficients a j for LB (c) and UB (d) as functions of κ, where the contributions of real and imaginary part are considered separately. a 1(2) corresponds to TM1 (TE4) quasi-BIC.

Along with Rabi splitting is the modulation of radiative polarization. When no coupling is involved for κ = 0, the TM1 and TE4 quasi-BICs possess linear eigenpolarizations along x- and y-direction, respectively. Once enantiomers with positive κ are introduced, optical chirality emerges in the two hybridized branches, whose evolution can be divided into two stages as shown in Figure 2b. Initially, the ellipticity angles of both branches are rapidly increased to enable right-handed elliptical polarizations. But beyond the EP, the two branches experience distinct changes: while the ellipticity angle of LB continues to rise steeply and then undergoes a gradual decrease after the saturation point, that of UB rapidly declines to be left-handed elliptically polarized and then converts to a gradual decrease. If a negative κ is introduced instead, the evolution processes of ellipticity angles are exchanged for LB and UB. Meanwhile, as clearly revealed in Figure 2b, it is the real part κ′ that has substantial influence on the radiative polarization, and the impact of κ′′ is much weaker.

To further analyze the chirality-induced mode hybridization, UB and LB are written as the superpositions of TM1 and TE4 quasi-BICs, where the coefficient a j basically indicates the strength of hybridization. As depicted in Figure 2c, mode hybridization is initiated by the introduction of a nonzero κ′ and rapidly promoted, with the proportion of TM1 quasi-BIC among LB declining from 1 to 0.5, while that of TE4 quasi-BIC growing from 0 to 0.5. This process is accomplished at the EP, beyond which a LB, 1 and a LB, 2 maintain around 0.5. If only the imaginary part κ′′ is involved, mode hybridization will not happen, as suggested by the flat dashed lines of a LB, 1 and a LB, 2 in Figure 2c. The dependence of coefficients on κ is complementary for UB as shown in Figure 2d.

In Figure 3a, we simulate the absorption spectra of the PCS for different κ under RCP and LCP incidence. For a relatively large κ = 0.5κ 0, the sharp resonances at 658.09 nm and 658.06 nm correspond to the LB and UB, respectively, which are fully separated. Since the ellipticity angles of the two branches have large absolute values but opposite signs, the RCP absorption is much larger than the LCP absorption at 658.09 nm, leading to a large CD of 0.346 (Figure 3b). Here, we define CD values as the differential absorption of the system:CD = A R A L , where A R and A L represent the absorption of RCP and LCP light, respectively. If κ is decreased, corresponding to a lower concentration of enantiomers in the solution, the resonant absorption of RCP and LCP does not change much, but their spectral positions get closer due to a smaller Rabi splitting, resulting in a larger overlap of their absorption peak. As a consequence, the acquired CD signal rapidly decreases (Figure 3b). Moreover, our retrieved CD spectra exhibit a characterized bisignate lineshape, owing to the oppositely signed ellipticity angles of the two branches.

Figure 3: 
Enhanced circular dichroism. (a, b) Simulated absorption spectra of the PCS under RCP and LCP incidence for different κ values (a) and the corresponding CD spectra (b). The subscript 1, 2, 3 corresponds to the κ value of 0.5κ
0, 0.3κ
0 and 0.1κ
0, respectively. (c) Retrieved CD values of LB and UB as a function of κ. The reference case of enantiomers without the PCS is multiplied by four orders of magnitude for comparison. (d) Dependence of CD values on κ if only the real part κ′ or imaginary part κ′′ is considered.
Figure 3:

Enhanced circular dichroism. (a, b) Simulated absorption spectra of the PCS under RCP and LCP incidence for different κ values (a) and the corresponding CD spectra (b). The subscript 1, 2, 3 corresponds to the κ value of 0.5κ 0, 0.3κ 0 and 0.1κ 0, respectively. (c) Retrieved CD values of LB and UB as a function of κ. The reference case of enantiomers without the PCS is multiplied by four orders of magnitude for comparison. (d) Dependence of CD values on κ if only the real part κ′ or imaginary part κ′′ is considered.

To evaluate the sensitivity of our proposed CD spectroscopy, we plot the CD signals of UB and LB as a function of κ (Figure 3c). The CD amplitudes of UB and LB correspond to the dip and peak values in Figure 3b, respectively. When compared to the reference case without the PCS, the sensitivity can be boosted by over four orders of magnitude, which has never been realized before. If the contributions of κ′ and κ′′ are separately considered (Figure 3d), it is apparent that our method is primarily based on the real part. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 3c, the variation tendency of CD is nonlinear, which is fast initially and then gradually slowed down. Therefore, this method is very suitable for the trace detection of enantiomers with an extremely low concentration. Also, we notice that the initial stage with a larger slope, corresponding a higher sensitivity, is around the EP. While EPs has been well investigated for significantly enhancing the performance of refractive sensing [32], [33], it is the first time to our knowledge that the physics of EP has shown great potential in ultrasensitive chiral sensing.

4 Discussion and conclusion

Although the relationship of κ″ ≪ κ′ is general for natural chiral molecules, their particular ratio depends on the type of molecule. In Figure 4a, we discuss the dependence of CD on κ″ for different values of κ′/κ″. The amplitude of CD, along with the sensitivity of CD spectroscopy, is strongly enhanced for a larger ratio κ′/κ″, further confirming the dominant role of κ′ in the generation CD. Besides, even for a relatively low ratio of κ′/κ″ = 20, the sensitivity of CD spectroscopy is still boosted by four orders of magnitude, relative to the reference case, suggesting that our method can be applied for a wide variety of chiral molecules.

Figure 4: 
Benckmark of our approach. (a) Retrieved CD values as a function of κ″, where different ratios κ′/κ″ are discussed. (b) Comparison between our approach and some typical chiral sensing works based on superchiral nanostructures in terms of the enhancement of CD and optical helicity density C.
Figure 4:

Benckmark of our approach. (a) Retrieved CD values as a function of κ″, where different ratios κ′/κ″ are discussed. (b) Comparison between our approach and some typical chiral sensing works based on superchiral nanostructures in terms of the enhancement of CD and optical helicity density C.

In Figure 4b, we compare our approach with some typical chiral sensing works based on superchiral nanostructures [21], [22], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], in terms of two figure of merit (FOM): enhancement of CD and optical helicity density C. Our approach is superior in both FOMs, offering unprecedented sensitivity in CD spectroscopy. Such improvement in performance is mainly attributed to two factors. First, while other approaches mainly depend on the imaginary part κ″, our method relies on the real part κ′, which is inherently two orders of magnitude larger that κ″. In fact, the real part κ′ is even ignored in some previous works [19], [20], [21], due to the conception that κ′ has no impact on CD. Second, the quasi-BICs we utilize for mode coupling possess high Q-factors and hence enable strong chiral light–matter interactions.

In conclusion, our results provide a distinct paradigm to harness the real part κ′ of enantiomers, but not the imaginary part κ″, for ultrasensitive CD spectroscopy. The coupling between two quasi-BICs with electromagnetic duality offers the platform, where κ′ could come into play in the generation of CD through Rabi splitting and mode chirality arising. Besides, as empowered by the physics of EP, the CD signals are very sensitive to the value of κ′, leading to the sensitivity of CD spectroscopy over four orders of magnitude larger than the case without mode coupling. This paves the way towards ultrasensitive detection, discrimination and structural analysis of chiral molecules, even to the single molecule level.

5 Simulation methods

All the simulations in this work are conducted by the finite element method solver in COMSOL Multiphysics. Bloch boundary conditions are applied in the x and y directions, while perfectly matched layers are employed in the z direction. To account for chiral media, the built-in electromagnetic equations have to rewritten to include the Pasteur parameter κ. In particular, the equations for displacement fields are modified as:

e w f d D x = e p s i l o n 0 _ c o n s t e w f d E x + e w f d . P x 1 i κ e w f d . H x / c 0 ,

e w f d D y = e p s i l o n 0 _ c o n s t e w f d E y + e w f d . P y 1 i κ e w f d . H y / c 0 ,

e w f d D z = e p s i l o n 0 _ c o n s t e w f d E z + e w f d . P z 1 i κ e w f d . H z / c 0 ,

The constitutive relations for H and d H /dt are modified as:

e w f d H x = e w f d m u r i n v x x e w f d . B x 1 i κ e w f d . E x / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v x y e w f d . B y 1 i κ e w f d . E y / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v x z e w f d . B z 1 i κ e w f d . E z / c 0 / m u 0 _ const ,

e w f d H y = e w f d m u r i n v y x e w f d . B x 1 i κ e w f d . E x / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v y y e w f d . B y 1 i κ e w f d . E y / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v y z e w f d . B z 1 i κ e w f d . E z / c 0 / m u 0 _ const ,

e w f d H z = e w f d m u r i n v z x e w f d . B x 1 i κ e w f d . E x / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v z y e w f d . B y 1 i κ e w f d . E y / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v z z e w f d . B z 1 i κ e w f d . E z / c 0 / m u 0 _ const ,

e w f d d H d t x = e w f d m u r i n v x x e w f d . d B d t x 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E x / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v x y e w f d . d B d t y 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E y / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v x z e w f d . d B d t z 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E z / c 0 / m u 0 _ const ,

e w f d d H d t y = e w f d m u r i n v y x e w f d . d B d t x 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E x / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v y y e w f d . d B d t y 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E y / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v y z e w f d . d B d t z 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E z / c 0 / m u 0 _ const ,

e w f d d H d t z = e w f d m u r i n v z x e w f d . d B d t x 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E x / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v z y e w f d . d B d t y 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E y / c 0 + e w f d . m u r i n v z z e w f d . d B d t z 1 i κ e w f d . i o m e g a e w f d . E z / c 0 / m u 0 _ const .


Corresponding authors: Chaowei Wang and Yang Chen, Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Precision Machinery and Precision Instrumentation, University of Science and Technology of China, 230027 Hefei, China, E-mail:  (C. Wang), (Y. Chen)

Tingting Guan and Zhenyu Wang contributed equally to this work.


Acknowledgements

YC acknowledges the support from the National Key Research and Development Project (Grant No. 2024YFA1410900, 2023YFB3610500) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62275241). DW acknowledges the support from the National Key Research and Development Project (Grant No. 2021YFF0502700) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62325507, 61927814). This work was partially carried out at the USTC Center for Micro and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication.

  1. Research funding: National Key Research and Development Project (Grant No. 2024YFA1410900, 2023YFB3610500). National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62275241). National Key Research and Development Project (Grant No. 2021YFF0502700). National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62325507, 61927814).

  2. Author contributions: YC conceived the idea. TG, ZW and CW conducted the simulations and performed the theoretical analysis. TG and ZW analyzed the data. TG and YC drafted the paper with inputs from all authors. CW and YC supervised the project. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] L. D. Barron, “Chirality and life,” Space Sci. Rev., vol. 135, pp. 187–201, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-007-9254-7.Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. A. L. A. J. E. Gurst, Organic Conformational Analysis and Stereochemistry from Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy, New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[3] B. Ranjbar and P. Gill, “Circular dichroism techniques: biomolecular and nanostructural analyses- a review,” Chem. Biol. Drug Des., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 101–120, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2009.00847.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] N. Berova, K. N, and R. W. Woody, Circular Dichroism Principles and Applications, New York, NY, Wiley, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[5] L. D. Barron, Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. Both, M. Schäferling, F. Sterl, E. A. Muljarov, H. Giessen, and T. Weiss, “Nanophotonic chiral sensing: how does it actually work?,” ACS Nano, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 2822–2832, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c09796.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] J. Garcia-Guirado, M. Svedendahl, J. Puigdollers, and R. Quidant, “Enhanced chiral sensing with dielectric nanoresonators,” Nano Lett., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 585–591, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04334.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Y. Tang and A. E. Cohen, “Optical chirality and its interaction with matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 104, no. 16, p. 163901, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.163901.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Y. Chen, et al.., “Multidimensional nanoscopic chiroptics,” Nature Rev. Phy., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 113–124, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00391-6.Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Vazquez-Guardado and D. Chanda, “Superchiral light generation on degenerate achiral surfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 120, no. 13, p. 137601, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.137601.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] E. Hendry, et al.., “Ultrasensitive detection and characterization of biomolecules using superchiral fields,” Nat. Nanotechnol., vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 783–787, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.209.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] E. Mohammadi, K. L. Tsakmakidis, A. N. Askarpour, P. Dehkhoda, A. Tavakoli, and H. Altug, “Nanophotonic platforms for enhanced chiral sensing,” ACS Photonics, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 2669–2675, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00270.Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Hu, M. Lawrence, and J. A. Dionne, “High quality factor dielectric metasurfaces for ultraviolet circular dichroism spectroscopy,” ACS Photonics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01352.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Y. Chen, W. Chen, X. Kong, D. Wu, J. Chu, and C. W. Qiu, “Can weak chirality induce strong coupling between resonant states?,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 128, no. 14, p. 146102, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.146102.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] S. Droulias and L. Bougas, “Absolute chiral sensing in dielectric metasurfaces using signal reversals,” Nano Lett., vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 5960–5966, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01938.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] T. Kakkar, et al.., “Superchiral near fields detect virus structure,” Light Sci. Appl., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 195, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-00433-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] L. A. Warning, A. R. Miandashti, L. A. McCarthy, Q. Zhang, C. F. Landes, and S. Link, “Nanophotonic approaches for chirality sensing,” ACS Nano, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 15538–15566, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c04992.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Y. Chen, C. Zhao, Y. Zhang, and C. W. Qiu, “Integrated molar chiral sensing based on high-Q metasurface,” Nano Lett, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 8696–8703, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03506.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] F. Graf, J. Feis, X. Garcia-Santiago, M. Wegener, C. Rockstuhl, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, “Achiral, helicity preserving, and resonant structures for enhanced sensing of chiral molecules,” ACS Photonics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 482–491, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01454.Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. Feis, et al.., “Helicity-preserving optical cavity modes for enhanced sensing of chiral molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 124, no. 3, p. 033201, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.033201.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] E. Mohammadi, et al.., “Accessible superchiral near-fields driven by tailored electric and magnetic resonances in all-dielectric nanostructures,” ACS Photonics, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1939–1946, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01767.Search in Google Scholar

[22] H. Barkaoui, K. Du, Y. Chen, S. Xiao, and Q. Song, “Merged bound states in the continuum for giant superchiral field and chiral mode splitting,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 107, no. 4, p. 045305, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.045305.Search in Google Scholar

[23] H. Qin, et al.., “Arbitrarily polarized bound states in the continuum with twisted photonic crystal slabs,” Light Sci. Appl., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 66, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01090-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] W. Q. H. Lv, et al.., “Robust generation of intrinsic C points with magneto-optical bound states in the continuum,” Sci. Adv., vol. 10, no. 46, p. eads0157, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01090-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, “Bound states in the continuum,” Nature Rev. Mater., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1–13, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.48.Search in Google Scholar

[26] B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, L. Lu, A. D. Stone, and M. Soljacic, “Topological nature of optical bound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 113, no. 25, p. 257401, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.257401.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] K. Koshelev, S. Lepeshov, M. Liu, A. Bogdanov, and Y. Kivshar, “Asymmetric metasurfaces with high-Q resonances governed by bound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, no. 19, p. 193903, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Y. Chen, et al.., “Observation of intrinsic chiral bound states in the continuum,” Nature, vol. 613, no. 7944, pp. 474–478, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05467-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] L. Huang, et al.., “Realizing ultrahigh-Q resonances through harnessing symmetry-protected bound states in the continuum,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 34, no. 11, p. 2309982, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202309982.Search in Google Scholar

[30] A. Overvig, N. Yu, and A. Alu, “Chiral quasi-bound states in the continuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 7, p. 073001, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.073001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] I. Fernandez-Corbaton, X. Zambrana-Puyalto, N. Tischler, X. Vidal, M. L. Juan, and G. Molina-Terriza, “Electromagnetic duality symmetry and helicity conservation for the macroscopic Maxwell’s equations,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 111, no. 6, p. 060401, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.060401.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] W. Chen, S. Kaya Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, “Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity,” Nature, vol. 548, no. 7666, pp. 192–196, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23281.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] J. Wiersig, “Review of exceptional point-based sensors,” Photon. Res., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1457–1467, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1364/prj.396115.Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. García-Etxarri and J. A. Dionne, “Surface-enhanced circular dichroism spectroscopy mediated by nonchiral nanoantennas,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, no. 23, p. 235409, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.235409.Search in Google Scholar

[35] K. Yao and Y. Liu, “Enhancing circular dichroism by chiral hotspots in silicon nanocube dimers,” Nanoscale, vol. 10, no. 18, pp. 8779–8786, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr00902c.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] K. Yao and Y. Zheng, “Near-ultraviolet dielectric metasurfaces: from surface-enhanced circular dichroism spectroscopy to polarization-preserving mirrors,” J. Phy. Chem. C, vol. 123, no. 18, pp. 11814–11822, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11245.Search in Google Scholar

[37] M. L. Solomon, J. Hu, M. Lawrence, A. García-Etxarri, and J. A. Dionne, “Enantiospecific optical enhancement of chiral sensing and separation with dielectric metasurfaces,” ACS Photonics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 43–49, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01365.Search in Google Scholar

[38] M. Schäferling, X. Yin, N. Engheta, and H. Giessen, “Helical plasmonic nanostructures as prototypical chiral near-field sources,” ACS Photonics, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 530–537, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1021/ph5000743.Search in Google Scholar

[39] G. Rui, S. Zou, B. Gu, and Y. Cui, “Surface-enhanced circular dichroism by localized superchiral hotspots in a dielectric dimer array metasurface,” J. Phy. Chem. C, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 2199–2206, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09618.Search in Google Scholar

[40] L. Ye, et al.., “Dielectric tetramer nanoresonators supporting strong superchiral fields for vibrational circular dichroism spectroscopy,” ACS Photonics, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 4377–4384, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c01186.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] E. Mohammadi, A. Tittl, K. L. Tsakmakidis, T. V. Raziman, and A. G. Curto, “Dual nanoresonators for ultrasensitive chiral detection,” ACS Photonics, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1754–1762, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00311.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0620).


Received: 2024-11-09
Accepted: 2024-12-19
Published Online: 2025-01-17

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Special issue: “Metamaterials and Plasmonics in Asia”
  4. Reviews
  5. All-optical analog differential operation and information processing empowered by meta-devices
  6. Metasurface-enhanced biomedical spectroscopy
  7. Topological guided-mode resonances: basic theory, experiments, and applications
  8. Letter
  9. Ultrasensitive circular dichroism spectroscopy based on coupled quasi-bound states in the continuum
  10. Research Articles
  11. Data-efficient prediction of OLED optical properties enabled by transfer learning
  12. Semimetal–dielectric–metal metasurface for infrared camouflage with high-performance energy dissipation in non-atmospheric transparency window
  13. Deep-subwavelength engineering of stealthy hyperuniformity
  14. Tunable structural colors based on grayscale lithography and conformal coating of VO2
  15. A general recipe to observe non-Abelian gauge field in metamaterials
  16. Free-form catenary-inspired meta-couplers for ultra-high or broadband vertical coupling
  17. Enhanced photoluminescence of strongly coupled single molecule-plasmonic nanocavity: analysis of spectral modifications using nonlocal response theory
  18. Spectral Hadamard microscopy with metasurface-based patterned illumination
  19. Tunneling of two-dimensional surface polaritons through plasmonic nanoplates on atomically thin crystals
  20. Highly sensitive microdisk laser sensor for refractive index sensing via periodic meta-hole patterning
  21. Scaled transverse translation by planar optical elements for sub-pixel sampling and remote super-resolution imaging
  22. Hyperbolic polariton-coupled emission optical microscopy
  23. Broadband perfect Littrow diffraction metasurface under large-angle incidence
  24. Role of complex energy and momentum in open cavity resonances
  25. Are nanophotonic intermediate mirrors really effective in enhancing the efficiency of perovskite tandem solar cells?
  26. Tunable meta-device for large depth of field quantitative phase imaging
  27. Enhanced terahertz magneto-plasmonic effect enabled by epsilon-near-zero iron slot antennas
  28. Baseline-free structured light 3D imaging using a metasurface double-helix dot projector
  29. Nanophotonic device design based on large language models: multilayer and metasurface examples
  30. High-efficiency generation of bi-functional holography with metasurfaces
  31. Dielectric metasurfaces based on a phase singularity in the region of high reflectance
  32. Exceptional points in a passive strip waveguide
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2024-0620/html
Scroll to top button