Home Selective surface-enhanced Raman scattering in a bulk nanoplasmonic Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite
Article Open Access

Selective surface-enhanced Raman scattering in a bulk nanoplasmonic Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite

  • Kamil Szlachetko , Piotr Piotrowski ORCID logo , Katarzyna Sadecka , Paweł Osewski , Dobrosława Kasprowicz and Dorota A. Pawlak EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 8, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A recent surge of interest in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has stimulated the search for new systems that can be utilized to fabricate high-performance optical devices. However, the two-dimensional design of the vast majority of SERS-based assemblies has significantly hindered their real-life applicability, motivating the development of three-dimensional volumetric materials. Here, we report selective SERS observed in a volumetric Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite obtained by the micro-pulling-down method utilizing directional solidification of eutectics. The enhancement of the Raman signal originates from the localized surface plasmon resonance, LSPR, resulting from silver nanoparticles embedded in the composite. The plasmonic origin of the enhancement is confirmed by characteristic features, such as (i) an enhancement magnitude >103, (ii) the correspondence between the Raman bands’ intensity upon excitation by different wavelengths and the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) intensity, and (iii) the occurrence of overtones, which are absent in the as-grown material that does not exhibit LSPR. The examined Bi2O3-Ag eutectic-based composite is obtained by directional solidification using a simple crystal growth technique. It is the first case of a bulk SERS-active material fabricated by crystal growth techniques, which opens new perspectives towards scalable three-dimensional optical elements with tunable properties based on Raman scattering.

1 Introduction

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) manifests as a gigantic amplification of the Raman signal of structural units, in close vicinity to plasmonic nanostructures, resulting from locally enhanced electromagnetic field. Field amplification is a consequence of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR): interaction of surface plasmons – collective electron oscillations at metal–dielectric interface of nanoobjects – with photons of characteristic frequencies. Since its discovery [1], SERS has generated considerable interest as a sensitive detection method with signal enhancement reaching 1013 [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. At the same time, the ability to amplify and tune the system response by exploiting the plasmonic origin of SERS makes it a promising technique in other fields where conventional Raman scattering has been successfully employed, e.g. in optical amplifiers and Raman lasers [8], [9]. Most of the developed SERS substrates are based on carefully designed assemblies of nanoparticles (NPs) stabilized by chemical bonds and assays generated on solid surfaces [10], [11], which are, however, challenging to incorporate into optical instruments. Even the reported 3D SERS platforms are not genuine volumetric systems but networks of NPs embedded on various surfaces or on other nano-/microparticles [12], [13], [14]. However, recent advances in manufacturing bulk nanoplasmonic composites via methods such as directional solidification of eutectics (DSE), nanoparticle direct doping (NPDD) and block co-polymer based techniques [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] have opened new paths for creating three-dimensional materials potentially suitable for SERS. It provides the necessary toolkit to develop novel bulk SERS-active materials.

Here, we achieve this goal by exploiting nanoplasmonic effects in eutectic composites, a class of solids that recently received much attention as new optical materials. Eutectics are two-phase, crystalline, self-organized composites where both phases grow simultaneously at a melting temperature which is lower than its component phases. Eutectic materials can be formed from various materials combinations, and exhibit a plethora of micro/nanostructures with geometrical motifs [20] which can provide interesting optical effects, among others. The two phases are separated with sharp interfaces which are often atomically smooth, and the size of the geometrical motifs (the micro/nanostructure refinement) can be controlled by technological parameters.

The research on utilizing eutectic composites as optical materials led to results in the areas of metamaterials [21], [22], eutectic photonic crystals [23], [24] and eutectic-based polaritonic materials operating in a wide wavelength regime, including visible, infrared and terahertz range [24], [25], [26], [27]. Here, we demonstrate the SERS effect in a bulk material with a potential for application in optical devices. The effect is observed in a nanoplasmonic, volumetric Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite exhibiting LSPR at approximately 595 nm [16], and the enhancement originates from the presence of Ag NPs in the volume of the material.

Earlier studies have identified this material to be made up of two separate phases. The structure consists of a matrix of α-Bi2O3 grains separated by an amorphous phase of precipitates containing Ag, Bi and O [28]. Post-growth heat treatment transforms this non-crystalline phase to a phase containing Ag and Bi NPs, as well as γ-Bi2O3 nanocrystals. The Ag NPs (5–13 nm in diameter) in the annealed material are responsible for the observed LSPR [16], [29]. The polymorphs of Bi2O3 present in the material have significantly different properties. The monoclinic alpha polymorph is the most common form of the Bi2O3 at room temperature. It belongs to the P21/c (C52h) space group, with four structural units per spectroscopic cell (Z = 4) [30], [31], and in principle it exhibits 30 Raman-active vibrational modes active in Raman spectra assigned to phonons of the lattice and oscillations of molecular units, i.e. BiOx [30], At the same time, the γ-Bi2O3 polymorph has a body-centred cubic structure and is a metastable phase that can exist at room temperature only under specific conditions [31]. The γ-Bi2O3 polymorph crystallizes in the I23 (T3) space group, with a unit cell consisting of two spectroscopic cells (Z = 2), and has 40 Raman-active vibrational modes [31]. The distinctive tetrahedral BiO4 units in the structure of the crystal give rise to the characteristic Raman bands of this phase.

In the present study, the following experiments were performed to characterize and explain the described effect: (i) Raman spectroscopy of Bi2O3-Ag composite and γ-Bi2O3 single crystal – to determine the influence of the plasmonic NPs on the composite’s Raman signal; (ii) Raman mapping of the composite – to monitor spatial distribution of the effect; (iii) wavelength-dependent Raman measurements and search for overtones to confirm the SERS effect by showing the resonance nature of the effect.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Synthesis

The Bi2O3-Ag composite was grown from pure starting materials of bismuth oxide powder (Alfa Aesar, 99.99% purity) and Ag (Alfa Aesar, 99.95% purity). The materials were mixed with isopropanol in an alumina mortar to a composition of 84.6 mol% Bi2O3 and 15.4 mol% Ag. This composition was calculated to give a 7.8 vol% volume fraction of Ag in the eutectic-based composite [16]. The Bi2O3-Ag material was grown at the Institute of Electronic Materials Technology (ITME) by the micro-pulling-down method [32] in a N2 atmosphere. After growth, some of the as-grown samples were annealed in ambient air at 600 °C for 10 h.

To obtain a Bi2O3 crystal, Bi2O3 powder was directly melted in a ceramic crucible (Al2O3) at 870 °C in ambient air using a resistance furnace.

2.2 Raman measurements

The Raman spectra were collected at room temperature on a LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon) equipped with an Olympus BXFM-ILHS confocal microscope working in backscattering geometry. Measurements were performed over the spectral range 50–4000 cm−1, the scattered signal was acquired with a 100× objective (NA = 0.9), the diameter of the confocal hole was 200 µm, and the diffraction grating was 1800 lines/mm. In the mapping mode, spectra of the Bi2O3-Ag eutectic were acquired with an accumulation time of 3 s, and three measurements were averaged. For γ-Bi2O3, single-crystal spectra were collected with a laser power of approximately 1 mW and 10 s of accumulation, and two measurements were averaged. Investigations were performed with three excitation laser sources: 473 nm (solid-state Cobolt Blues 25), 532 nm (Nd:YAG laser, Torus Laser, Laser Quantum, U.K.) and 633 nm (He–Ne laser), with beam powers of 370, 546 and 502 µW, respectively. Given the differences in the laser output powers, spectra collected with the 473 and 633 nm lasers were normalized to the intensity of spectra obtained from the 532 nm laser by multiplying them by a power factor, defined as the ratio of the green 532 nm laser power to the power of the exciting laser (473 nm or 633 nm). This factor equalled 1.48 for the blue and 1.09 for the red laser. The collected Raman spectra were processed by subtracting the baseline, performing a Lorentzian-type fit and calculating the integral intensities. Excitation-dependent Raman scattering was measured at one spot with the three available laser sources.

2.3 Extinction coefficient measurements

LSPR was detected by extinction measurements using CRAIC 20/20 PV UV–VIS–NIR microspectrophotometer in a transmission mode. Measurements were performed using a xenon light source at room temperature in the spectral range from 200 to 1000 nm on a 21.1 × 21.1 µm sampling area and collected 5–7 times for every sample and averaged.

2.4 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

SEM measurements were performed on an AURIGA™ CrossBeam® Workstation (Carl Zeiss). SEM images were collected with a back-scattered electron detector. An electron accelerating bias of 30 kV was applied.

2.5 Evaluation of the phase content

Concentration of γ-Bi2O3 nanocrystals in the precipitates was assessed based on high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) dark field images [28]. The area showing the precipitates was selected and the number of bright pixels representing γ-Bi2O3 crystals was divided by the total number of pixels. The procedure of evaluating the concentration of γ-Bi2O3 is described in Supplementary material.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Raman micro-properties of the component

In order to characterize structural properties of the studied eutectic material, Raman spectra and maps were acquired from the Bi2O3-Ag composite with embedded Ag NPs (Figure 1a and b). The maps revealed significantly different features between the Bi2O3 matrix and the Ag-containing precipitates (SEM image of the composite microstructure with marked regions of the matrix and precipitates is presented in Figure 1c). The spectra collected from the matrix (Figure 1a, red spectrum) exhibited 13 Raman bands between 50 and 450 cm−1 that can be directly assigned to α-Bi2O3 [33]. Lower-wavenumber bands (from 50 to ca. 250 cm−1) are assigned to translations of heavy bismuth cations and vibrational modes of bismuth and oxygen in the Bi–O crystal lattice [34]. Bands above 250 cm−1 are associated with stretching modes of BiO5 and BiO6 units [33]. On the other hand, spectra collected from the Ag-containing precipitates in the annealed material (Figure 1b) showed additional Raman bands, the main one being at 826 cm−1, which were not observed in the α-Bi2O3 matrix, nor in the spectra collected from analogous areas in the non-annealed, as-grown composite (Figure S1). These new features could result from another polymorph of Bi2O3. This is in agreement with the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements [28] which demonstrated another polymorph: γ-Bi2O3 nanocrystals in the areas containing Ag precipitates. The spectroscopic distinction between the alpha and gamma polymorphs is ambiguous, given the overlapping of their bands up to 550 cm−1; however, at larger wavenumbers, characteristic bands of γ-Bi2O3 are apparent, assigned to stretching vibrations in tetrahedral BiO4 units. At the same time, band at 826 cm−1 had an unexpectedly high intensity, when compared with the literature reports [33]. Furthermore, scattering intensity from the Ag-containing precipitates was weaker than from the matrix phase (Figure 1a, blue spectrum). This may result from the presence of Raman-inactive Bi and Ag NPs next to Bi2O3, thus Bi2O3 giving rise to the Raman signal does not compose the entire volume of the precipitates [16], [28].

Figure 1: Microstructure and selective SERS observed in the volumetric eutectic-based Bi2O3-Ag composite exhibiting LSPR at visible wavelengths. Raman spectra (a) and map (b) presenting the contrast between areas containing silver precipitates and the matrix of the composite. Red colour (spectrum and map) is assigned to the α-Bi2O3 phase (the 450 cm−1 peak intensity); blue represents the γ-Bi2O3 phase (illustrating the intensity of the 826 cm−1 peak characteristic of this phase). (c) SEM image of the micro-/nanostructure of the composite: light grey – Bi2O3 matrix, dark grey – Ag-containing precipitates. (d) The optical image of the γ-Bi2O3 single crystal. (e) Strong enhancement specifically of the γ-Bi2O3 phase band at 826 cm−1 for the Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite in Ag-containing precipitates (blue line) in comparison with the γ-Bi2O3 single crystal (green line), λexc = 532 nm.
Figure 1:

Microstructure and selective SERS observed in the volumetric eutectic-based Bi2O3-Ag composite exhibiting LSPR at visible wavelengths. Raman spectra (a) and map (b) presenting the contrast between areas containing silver precipitates and the matrix of the composite. Red colour (spectrum and map) is assigned to the α-Bi2O3 phase (the 450 cm−1 peak intensity); blue represents the γ-Bi2O3 phase (illustrating the intensity of the 826 cm−1 peak characteristic of this phase). (c) SEM image of the micro-/nanostructure of the composite: light grey – Bi2O3 matrix, dark grey – Ag-containing precipitates. (d) The optical image of the γ-Bi2O3 single crystal. (e) Strong enhancement specifically of the γ-Bi2O3 phase band at 826 cm−1 for the Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite in Ag-containing precipitates (blue line) in comparison with the γ-Bi2O3 single crystal (green line), λexc = 532 nm.

3.2 SERS in the volumetric nanoplasmonic composite

To verify the unusually high intensity of the 826 cm−1 band in the composite, we compared it with the Raman spectrum of the γ-Bi2O3 single crystal, grown for this study (Figure 1d). The intensity ratio of the Raman bands varies significantly between the spectra collected from the precipitates in the investigated composite and those from the pure γ-Bi2O3 microcrystal (Figure 1e). The Raman spectrum of the microcrystal exhibited a low-intensity 826 cm−1 band assigned to the asymmetric stretching mode of Bi–O bonds in BiO4 tetrahedral units in the pure gamma phase [30], [31]. The comparison clearly demonstrates that the strikingly high intensity of this band in the Bi2O3–Ag composite cannot have its origin exclusively in the pure γ-Bi2O3 phase.

The 826 cm−1 band in the Raman spectrum of the composite precipitates is approximately two hundred times more intense than that in the spectrum of a pure γ-Bi2O3 crystal. This value will increase when we take into account the volume fraction of the Bi2O3 phase. Estimation based on previous studies indicates that γ-Bi2O3 nanocrystals make up approximately 4% of the precipitate volume in the Bi2O3-Ag composite. That is why the enhancement factor (EF) increases by a factor of 25 to EF = 5000.

We hypothesised that the observed approximately 5000-fold enhancement of the 826 cm−1 Raman band intensity can be explained by SERS resulting from LSPR of Ag NPs present in-between the γ-Bi2O3 nanocrystals in the Ag-containing precipitates. In the case of the plasmonic origin of the effect, dependence of the enhanced Raman band intensity on the excitation wavelength is expected to reflect the LSPR peak in the extinction spectrum [35]. Thus, to verify this hypothesis, we collected Raman spectra with different excitation wavelengths in the range of the LSPR peak in Bi2O3-Ag composite (Figure 2a). In Figure 2b, the integral intensities of the 826 cm−1 band characteristic of the γ-Bi2O3 phase for three excitation wavelengths: 473, 532 and 633 nm, are compared with the LSPR represented by the band corresponding to the extinction coefficient of Bi2O3-Ag [16]. The intensity of the enhanced band follows the same trend as the intensity of the LSPR peak at each particular wavelength. The highest signal occurs for the 532 nm excitation, which is closest to the LSPR maximum among the applied excitation wavelengths. On the other hand, the described effect is weakest for the shoulder of the LSPR band in the spectrum collected upon illumination of the Bi2O3-Ag material with the 633 nm laser. The systematic shift of the points towards lower wavelengths with respect to the LSPR curve in the studied system has been also observed for other SERS systems [35]. It stems from the fact that both the incident and scattered beams undergo electromagnetic enhancement in SERS [36]. As a result, maximum of the excitation profile does not fall exactly at the LSPR maximum wavelength. The direct correspondence of the wavelength-dependent Raman signal intensity with the LSPR peak proves the resonant (plasmonic) origin of the strong enhancement of the 826 cm−1 band.

Figure 2: LSPR as the origin of the Raman enhancement in the Bi2O3-Ag composite. (a) Raman spectra from the precipitates containing Ag and γ-Bi2O3 nanocrystals, collected with three excitation wavelengths, 473, 532 and 633 nm. (b) Excitation profile: integral intensities of the 826 cm−1 Raman bands (triangles) obtained with different excitation wavelengths, compared with the LSPR peak in the extinction spectrum (solid black line). The grey dashed line presents the Gaussian fit to the excitation profile. The relationship between the intensities of the LSPR and the investigated Raman band is consistent with the plasmonic resonant origin of the Raman band enhancement.
Figure 2:

LSPR as the origin of the Raman enhancement in the Bi2O3-Ag composite. (a) Raman spectra from the precipitates containing Ag and γ-Bi2O3 nanocrystals, collected with three excitation wavelengths, 473, 532 and 633 nm. (b) Excitation profile: integral intensities of the 826 cm−1 Raman bands (triangles) obtained with different excitation wavelengths, compared with the LSPR peak in the extinction spectrum (solid black line). The grey dashed line presents the Gaussian fit to the excitation profile. The relationship between the intensities of the LSPR and the investigated Raman band is consistent with the plasmonic resonant origin of the Raman band enhancement.

As we observed in the plasmonic Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite, SERS enhancement occurs only for Raman bands assigned to vibrational modes of the BiO4 groups. This fact can be explained on the basis of the internal/external vibration model for crystals [37]. In many solids, specific molecular groups of tightly bound atoms, loosely connected to the rest of the lattice, can be identified. Their vibrational modes (internal vibrations) are expected to exhibit higher frequencies than the lattice vibrational modes (external vibrations) [37]. In the same way, the structure of the γ-Bi2O3 crystal can be described as a combination of the bismuth–oxygen lattice surrounding isolated tetrahedral BiO4 groups, behaving like free molecules [38]. Evidently, isolated BiO4 groups behave like chemical molecules exposed to the amplified electromagnetic field: for those located in the direct vicinity of the metallic nanostructures, an increase in the Raman scattering intensity is observed. This result in the selective SERS enhancement of bands assigned to the vibrations of these specific molecular groups; the effect is observed for 826 cm−1 band in the Bi2O3 composite.

3.3 Overtones observed due to the SERS effect

To further confirm the resonant origin of the observed enhancement, we inspected Raman spectra at higher wavenumbers in search for overtones, which are hard to find in standard Raman spectra. Due to the enhancement of a Raman band in SERS, overtones of this particular vibration are also affected, thus they can be detected more easily [39]. The higher-wavenumber region of the spectra disclosed well-resolved bands at 1650 cm−1(2v˜) and 2474 cm−1(3v˜), which so far have not been observed in the pure γ-Bi2O3 phase (Figure 3) nor in the as-grown eutectic material (Figure S1). Their positions and relatively low intensities indicate that they are second- and third-order modes of the enhanced band at 826 cm−1. Observation of the overtones is consistent with the manifestation of the SERS effect in the studied plasmonic material. The presence of second- and third-order modes is possible due to the interaction of isolated BiO4 tetrahedra with a plasmon-driven amplified electromagnetic field from Ag NPs in the composite.

Figure 3: Occurrence of overtones due to the SERS effect in the Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite and comparison with the spectrum of the γ-Bi2O3 single crystal. The eutectics’ spectrum (blue spectrum) reveals overtones (2v˜)$\left(2\tilde {v}\right)$ and (3v˜)$\left(3\tilde {v}\right)$ of the 826 cm−1 band, whereas the single crystal does not exhibit resonant effects (green spectrum), λexc = 532 nm.
Figure 3:

Occurrence of overtones due to the SERS effect in the Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite and comparison with the spectrum of the γ-Bi2O3 single crystal. The eutectics’ spectrum (blue spectrum) reveals overtones (2v˜) and (3v˜) of the 826 cm−1 band, whereas the single crystal does not exhibit resonant effects (green spectrum), λexc = 532 nm.

4 Conclusions

In summary, we report the first case of a selective SERS effect in a genuine bulk nanoplasmonic material, supported by the presence of Ag NPs in the multiphase structure of the self-organized Bi2O3-Ag eutectic material.

When it comes to tunability of the presented effect, two aspects should be considered. First, tunability in a small range can be executed by using different excitation wavelengths within the width of LSPR – as shown in our studies of Bi2O3-Ag eutectic composite. However, even in this material, the range of tunability can be widened by shifting the LSPR resonance: dependence of LSPR position on different post-growth annealing parameters: time, temperature and atmosphere has already been shown in this material [29]. Annealing in different conditions may influence the size and chemical composition of generated NPs as well as dielectric constant, resulting in the shift of the LSPR in the material.

Opportunities to tune the maximum amplification over a broad range of wavelengths can be accessed by manufacturing new composite materials with nanoparticles exhibiting plasmonic resonances at different wavelength ranges. Alternatively, combining various NPs in a single composite may result in a material tunable in a wide wavelength range. Novel fabrication methods, such as DSE [16], NPDD [15], block-copolymer-based techniques [19] or nanoparticles aligned in porous matrices [40] can enable manufacturing of such advanced materials.

Volumetric materials with such a control over the effect, as well as high intensity of the enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), are desirable in various optical devices. For example, in Raman lasers, which offer spectral flexibility, with the operating wavelength tuned by selecting a suitable pump wavelength, or Raman amplifiers, where the bulk crystal Raman-active medium amplifies the intensity of the input signal. Also, as a well-localized effect confined to small areas in a large platform, it may be relevant in space-resolved applications.

Finally, SERS has been mostly explored for chemical molecules adsorbed on an active surface. Mechanism of the effect in the solid state, where not only vibrations of isolated molecules but also oscillations of the whole lattice must be considered, has not been fully elucidated. Thus, our research is a first report on SERS in volumetric samples and opens discussion on the SERS phenomenon in bulk materials. Overall, we expect that our studies will inspire follow-up research on SERS in other ordered volumetric eutectic-based materials, both in terms of applications and mechanism of the phenomenon.


Corresponding author: Dorota A. Pawlak, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093, Warsaw, Poland; and Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Electronic Materials Technology, Wolczynska 133, 01-919, Warsaw, Poland; and ENSEMBLE3 sp. z o.o., Wolczynska 133, 01-919 Warsaw, Poland, E-mail:

Authors Kamil Szlachetko and Piotr Piotrowski contributed equally to this work.


Award Identifier / Grant number: TEAM/2016-3/29

Funding source: National Science Centre

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2013/10/M/ST5/00650

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the TEAM Project (TEAM/2016-3/29) of the Foundation for Polish Science, co-financed by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund and the HARMONIA Project (2013/10/M/ST5/00650) from the National Science Centre for support of this work. The authors thank Prof. Marie-Helene Berger from MINES ParisTech for providing dark-field images of Bi2O3-Ag using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.

  1. Author contribution: K. Szlachetko and P. Piotrowski contributed equally to this work.

  2. Research funding: The authors thank the TEAM Project (TEAM/2016-3/29) of the Foundation for Polish Science, co-financed by the European Union under the European Regional Development Fund and the HARMONIA Project (2013/10/M/ST5/00650) from the National Science Centre for support of this work.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] M. Fleischmann, P. J. Hendra, and A. J. McQuillan, “Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode,” Chem. Phys. Lett., vol. 26, pp. 163–166, 1974, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(74)85388-1.Search in Google Scholar

[2] C. E. Talley, L. Jusinski, C. W. Hollars, S. M. Lane, and T. Huser, “Intracellular pH sensors based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering,” Anal. Chem., vol. 76, pp. 7064–7068, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac049093j.Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. Kneipp, H. Kneipp, B. Wittig, and K. Kneipp, “Following the dynamics of pH in endosomes of live cells with SERS nanosensors,” J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 114, pp. 7421–7426, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp910034z.Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Langer, I. García, and L. M. Liz-Marzán, “Real-time dynamic SERS detection of galectin using glycan-decorated gold nanoparticles,” Faraday Discuss, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00123A.Search in Google Scholar

[5] K. Ma, J. M. Yuen, N. C. Shah, J. T. Walsh, M. R. Glucksberg, and R. P. Van Duyne, “Vivo, transcutaneous glucose sensing using surface-enhanced spatially offset Raman spectroscopy: multiple rats, improved hypoglycemic accuracy, low incident power, and continuous monitoring for greater than 17 days,” Anal. Chem., vol. 83, pp. 9146–9152, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac202343e.Search in Google Scholar

[6] P. Piotrowski and J. Bukowska, “Ion permeation through silica coating of silver nanoparticles functionalized with 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate anions: SiO2-encapsulated SERS probes for metal cations,” J. Phys. Chem. C, vol. 120, pp. 12092–12099, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03462.Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. Goodacre, D. Graham, and K. Faulds, “Recent developments in quantitative SERS: moving towards absolute quantification,” Trac. Trends Anal. Chem., vol. 102, pp. 359–368, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. N. Islam, “Raman amplifiers for telecommunications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top Quantum Electron., vol. 8, pp. 548–559, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1109/jstqe.2002.1016358.Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Rong, R. Jones, A. Liu, et al., “A continuous-wave Raman silicon laser,” Nature, vol. 433, pp. 725–728, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03346.Search in Google Scholar

[10] N. Gisbert Quilis, M. Lequeux, P. Venugopalan, et al., “Tunable laser interference lithography preparation of plasmonic nanoparticle arrays tailored for SERS,” Nanoscale, vol. 10, pp. 10268–10278, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr08905h.Search in Google Scholar

[11] C. Matricardi, C. Hanske, J. L. Garcia-Pomar, J. Langer, A. Mihi, and L. M. Liz-Marzán, “Gold nanoparticle plasmonic superlattices as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates,” ACS Nano, vol. 12, pp. 8531–8539, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b04073.Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. Kattumenu, C. H. Lee, L. Tian, M. E. McConney, and S. Singamaneni, “Nanorod decorated nanowires as highly efficient SERS-active hybrids,” J. Mater. Chem., vol. 21, p. 15218, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12426a.Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. Chen, I. Y. Phang, M. R. Lee, J. K. W. Yang, and X. Y. Ling, “Layer-by-layer assembly of Ag nanowires into 3D woodpile-like structures to achieve high density “hot spots” for surface-enhanced Raman scattering,” Langmuir, vol. 29, pp. 7061–7069, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1021/la4012108.Search in Google Scholar

[14] L. A. Wu, W. E. Li, D. Z. Lin, and Y. F. Chen, “Three-dimensional SERS substrates formed with plasmonic core-satellite nanostructures,” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, pp. 1–11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13577-9.Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Gajc, H. B. Surma, A. Klos, et al., “Nanoparticle direct doping: novel method for manufacturing three-dimensional bulk plasmonic nanocomposites,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 23, pp. 3443–3451, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201203116.Search in Google Scholar

[16] K. Sadecka, M. Gajc, K. Orlinski, et al., “When eutectics meet plasmonics: nanoplasmonic, volumetric, self-organized, silver-based eutectic,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 3, pp. 381–389, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201400425.Search in Google Scholar

[17] I. Levchenko, K. Bazaka, M. Keidar, S. Xu, and J. Fang, “Hierarchical multicomponent inorganic metamaterials: intrinsically driven self-assembly at the nanoscale,” Adv. Mater., vol. 30, pp. 1–32, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201870009.Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Mühlig, A. Cunningham, J. Dintinger, et al., “Self-assembled plasmonic metamaterials,” Nanophotonics, vol. 2, pp. 211–240, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2012-0036.Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. Alvarez-Fernandez, K. Aissou, G. Pécastaings, G. Hadziioannou, G. Fleury, and V. Ponsinet, “High refractive index in low metal content nanoplasmonic surfaces from self-assembled block copolymer thin films,” Nanoscale Adv., vol. 1, pp. 849–857, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8na00239h.Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. A. Kulkarni, E. Hanson, R. Zhang, K. Thornton, and P. V. Braun, “Archimedean lattices emerge in template-directed eutectic solidification,” Nature, vol. 577, pp. 355–358, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1893-9.Search in Google Scholar

[21] D. A. Pawlak, S. Turczynski, M. Gajc, et al., “How far are we from making metamaterials by self-organization? the microstructure of highly anisotropic particles with an SRR-like geometry,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 20, pp. 1116–1124, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200901875.Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. F. Acosta, S. G. Rodrigo, L. Martín-Moreno, C. Pecharromán, and R. I. Merino, “Micropillar templates for dielectric filled metal arrays and flexible metamaterials,” Adv. Opt. Mater., vol. 5, pp. 1–6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201600670.Search in Google Scholar

[23] D. A. Pawlak, K. Kolodziejak, S. Turczynski, et al., “Self-organized, rodlike, micrometer-scale microstructure of Tb3Sc2Al3O12-TbScO3: Pr eutectic,” Chem. Mater., vol. 18, pp. 2450–2457, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm060136h.Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. Kim, L. K. Aagesen, J. H. Choi, et al., “Template-directed directionally solidified 3D mesostructured AgCl-KCl eutectic photonic crystals,” Adv. Mater., vol. 27, pp. 4551–4559, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201502265.Search in Google Scholar

[25] J. W. Boley, K. Chaudhary, T. J. Ober, et al., “High-operating-temperature direct ink writing of mesoscale eutectic architectures,” Adv. Mater., vol. 29, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604778.Search in Google Scholar

[26] R. I. Merino, M. F. Acosta, and V. M. Orera, “New polaritonic materials in the THz range made of directionally solidified halide eutectics,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., vol. 34, pp. 2061–2069, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.10.025.Search in Google Scholar

[27] V. Myroshnychenko, A. Stefanski, A. Manjavacas, et al., “Interacting plasmon and phonon polaritons in aligned nano- and microwires,” Opt. Express, vol. 20, p. 10879, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.010879.Search in Google Scholar

[28] K. Sadecka, M. H. Berger, K. Orlinski, I. Jozwik, and D. A. Pawlak, “Evolution of silver in a eutectic-based Bi2O3–Ag metamaterial,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 52, pp. 5503–5510, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0746-2.Search in Google Scholar

[29] K. Sadecka, J. Toudert, H. B. Surma, and D. A. Pawlak, “Temperature and atmosphere tunability of the nanoplasmonic resonance of a volumetric eutectic-based Bi2O3-Ag metamaterial,” Opt. Express., vol. 23, p. 19098, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.019098.Search in Google Scholar

[30] W. Wojdowski, “Vibrational modes in Bi12GeO20 and Bi12SiO20 crystals,” Phys. Status solidi, vol. 130, pp. 121–130, 1985, https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221300109.Search in Google Scholar

[31] D. J. Arenas, C. Middleton, and A. F. Kemper, “First-principles study of the phonon modes in bismuth sillenites,” Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter. Mater. Phys., vol. 91, pp. 1–14, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.91.144103.Search in Google Scholar

[32] D. H. Yoon, I. Yonenaga, T. Fukuda, and N. Ohnishi, “Crystal growth of dislocation-free LiNbO3 single crystals by micro pulling down method,” J. Cryst. Growth., vol. 142, pp. 339–343, 1994, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(94)90342-5.Search in Google Scholar

[33] A. J. Salazar-Pérez, M. A. Camacho-López, R. A. Morales-Luckie, V. Sánchez-Mendieta, and F. Ureña-Núñez, “Structural evolution of Bi2O3 prepared by thermal oxidation of bismuth nano-particles,” Superf. y Vacío., vol. 18, pp. 4–8, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[34] M. Malligavathy, and D. Pathinettam Padiyan, “Role of pH in the hydrothermal synthesis of phase pure alpha Bi2O3 nanoparticles and its structural characterization,” Adv. Mater. Proc., vol. 2, pp. 51–5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5185/amp.2017/112.Search in Google Scholar

[35] A. D. McFarland, M. A. Young, J. A. Dieringer, and R. P. Van Duyne, “Wavelength-scanned surface-enhanced Raman excitation spectroscopy,” J. Phys. Chem. B, vol. 109, pp. 11279–11285, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp050508u.Search in Google Scholar

[36] G. C. Schatz, M. A. Young, and R. P. Duyne, “Electromagnetic mechanism of SERS,” Surface-enhanced Raman scattering, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp. 19–45.10.1007/3-540-33567-6_2Search in Google Scholar

[37] Y. Liu, H. Wang, G. Chen, Y. D. Zhou, B. Y. Gu, and B. Q. Hu, “Analysis of Raman spectra of ZnWO4 single crystals,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 64, pp. 4651–4653, 1988, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.341245.Search in Google Scholar

[38] V. I. Burkov, V. S. Gorelik, A. V. Egorysheva, and Y. F. Kargin, “Laser Raman spectroscopy of crystals with the structure of sillenite,” J. Russ. Laser Res., vol. 22, pp. 243–267, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011302622083.10.1023/A:1011302622083Search in Google Scholar

[39] J. C. Rubim, and R. F. Aroca, “The observation of high order overtones and combinations in the SERRS spectra of a perylene dye spin coated onto silver island films,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., vol. 10, p. 5412, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1039/b804950e.Search in Google Scholar

[40] J. Lyu, X. Wang, L. Liu, et al., “High strength conductive composites with plasmonic nanoparticles aligned on aramid nanofibers,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 26, pp. 8435–8445, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201603230.Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0281.

Received: 2020-05-11
Accepted: 2020-06-12
Published Online: 2020-07-08

© 2020 Kamil Szlachetko et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0281/html
Scroll to top button