Home Recent advances in graphene and black phosphorus nonlinear plasmonics
Article Open Access

Recent advances in graphene and black phosphorus nonlinear plasmonics

  • Renlong Zhou ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Kaleem Ullah EMAIL logo , Sa Yang EMAIL logo , Qiawu Lin , Liangpo Tang , Dan Liu , Shuang Li , Yongming Zhao and Fengqiu Wang
Published/Copyright: March 18, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Over the past decade, the plasmonics of graphene and black phosphorus (BP) were widely recognized as promising media for establishing linear and nonlinear light-matter interactions. Compared to the conventional metals, they support significant light-matter interaction of high efficiency and show undispersed optical properties. Furthermore, in contrast to the conventional metals, the plasmonic properties of graphene and BP structure can be tuned by electrical and chemical doping. In this review, a deep attention was paid toward the second- and third-order nonlinear plasmonic modes of graphene and BP. We present a theoretical framework for calculating the lifetime for surface plasmons modes of graphene and BP assisted by the coupled mode theory. The effect of the Fermi energy on the second-order and third-order nonlinear response is studied in detail. We survey the recent advances in nonlinear optics and the applications of graphene and BP-based tunable plasmonic devices such as light modulation devices, switches, biosensors, and other nonlinear photonic devices. Finally, we highlight a few representative current applications of graphene and BP to photonic and optoelectronic devices.

1 Introduction

The surface plasmons (SPs) can control and confine electromagnetic (EM) field in subwavelength scales. To control SPs, several structures such as topological defect, prism, cavity, and metameterials can be employed [1]. Coupled with electrons, phonons, or photons, surface plasmons in metal and 2D material were investigated theoretically as well as experimentally for the development of linear and nonlinear photonics nanoplatform [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Previously, the novel plasmonic materials such as Ag, Al, and Au were used in broad applications for nonlinear plasmonic device [8], [9], temperature and gas sensor [10], [11], [12], [13], flexible electrode [14], graphite-based batteries [15], terahertz metamaterial controlled with thermal [16], symmetry-breaking-induced nonlinearity in a microcavity [17], and nonlinearity in the dark [18]. However, these noble metals have large energy dissipation due to radiative and Ohmic losses. Moreover, these conventional metals exhibit a poor tunability. To solve this problem, the plasmonic of 2D materials, especially graphene and BP, attracted a deep interest owing to their high electrical tunability in contrast to noble metals.

The atomic thin 2D nanomaterial sheet presents significant light-matter interaction phenomena owing to quantum confinement effect. Their electronic structures and optical properties are distinctive from their bulk morphology. The carrier (both electrons and holes) density in graphene can be engineered by changing their surrounding dielectric environment or grating structure [19], [20]. The important role of BP plasmonics is an easy control on nanoscale electromagnetic field compared to the conventional materials [21], [22]. The frequency region for efficient wave localization can be up to mid-infrared and terahertz frequencies, and thus, it verifies that graphene and BP can be utilized in several promising applications such as the surface plasmons [23], photodetectors [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], enhanced Raman scattering [29], gate-tuning nano-imaging [30], optical modulator [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], ultrafast nonlinear ultrafast laser [37], [38], sensors [39], optical switches [40], [41], energy conversion [42], optical force [43], plasmonic logic gate [44], and broadband light absorption in multiple graphene nanoresonator [45]. Several investigations on the BP plasmonic were carried out in literature such as the polarization-dependent symmetric and anti-symmetric plasmonic modes of BP pairs, which were found due to the anisotropic dispersion [46] and defect engineering in few-layer BP [47]. The graphene and BP plasmonic with a large nonlinear optical constant can be used as a photonic platform to study the nonlinear optical interaction within 2D material [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53]. The graphene and BP plasmonic have the large third harmonic generation (THG) and strong Kerr nonlinearity [3], [54], [55], [56], and induced second harmonic generation (SHG) [57], [58], [59]. A detailed description of the graphene and BP plasmonic concepts, computational methods, and Z-scan measurements in nonlinear plasmonics can be found in a few excellent reviews [60], [61], [62], [63], [64]. The coexistence of local field enhancement and strongly induced nonlinearity in properly designed 2D materials open up an alternative route for high-efficiency tunable nonlinear devices. It is demonstrated that a broadband THz emission of 2D materials has a giant efficiency, which is about two orders stronger compared to that of a conventional metasurfaces [65], [66]. The 2D material plasmonics opens up opportunities for not only THz technology but also on-chip nonlinear nano-optical devices.

There are mainly two types of the methods for preparing graphene, BP, and 2D materials, which include dissection methods (top-down routes) and the growth methods (bottom-up routes). In layered materials such as graphene and BP, the atoms with strong in-plane chemical bonds are vertically stacked through a weak physical electrostatic force (van der Waals interaction) to form bulk crystals. This weak interaction between the layers provides us a possibility of top-down routes including micromechanical exfoliation method and liquid phase exfoliation [67], [68]. The bottom up routes for preparing the 2D materials are called the thin film deposition methods such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD), magnetron sputtering, atomic layer deposition (ALD), molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), pulsed-laser deposition (PLD), and so on [69], [70], [71], [72]. Among these thin film deposition methods, the most famous method is CVD. In the CVD method, the synthesized 2D materials through the CVD method were grown on a substrate, where the source materials may be either carried by inert gas (e.g. argon) and then deposited on the target substrates or pre-deposited on the target substrates and then converted to 2D sheets [73].

Compared to the traditional mode-locked fiber applications [37], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], the ultrafast saturable absorber (SA) of 2D material for wavelength insensitive plays an important role in many fields [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98]. A few-layer BP-based saturable absorber was experimentally demonstrated, which could be acted as an optical modulator used to generate short laser pulses in solid-state lasers [99]. MoS2/graphene nanocomposites can act as ultrafast photonics and lasers [100], [101]. Tunable, electrically controlled graphene was investigated as a planar plasmonic filter [102], [103]. With the improvement in the oxygen evolution reaction activity, BP grown on a carbon nanotube network can show better activity in the electrocatalyst [104]. Ultrathin BP sheets exhibit efficient photothermal therapy due to strong near-infrared (NIR) light absorption and excellent photothermal performance [105]. BP has biomedicine application due to its unique properties of bio-compatibility [106]. Few-layer BP can also be applied as electrocatalysts due to highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction [107]. Graphene oxide and BP flake aerogels have an enhanced photothermal character for its robust thermo stability [108]. Light activation of BP applied for cancer therapy in hydrogel nanostructures can be used for the smart NIR light-controlled drug release [109]. At room temperature, the 2D material such as graphene and BP can be used for a THz detector with high performance [110], plasmonic fiberoptic biosensor [111], Faraday rotator [112], and chirped nonlinear photonic crystal cavity [113]. The composite structure of isotropic graphene and anisotropic BP has strong coherent coupling property, and their strong coupling between graphene and BP is described with an oscillator model [114].

In this review, we provide graphene and BP tunable nonlinear plasmonics information and its applications in the physical system. The weak light absorption of ultrathin graphene and BP sheets hinders their application, but the light absorption can be enhanced in graphene and BP using grating structure or by making a strong light-matter interaction system. Furthermore, the graphene and BP plasmonic properties can be modified by electrical and chemical doping. In section 2, we will present the theoretical basis including the optical conductivity and optical nonlinear properties, which are required to understand the graphene and BP tunable nonlinear plasmonics. In section 3, a detailed summary of the research results will be provided, which described the linear and nonlinear properties of the graphene and BP. We present a theoretical framework for calculating the lifetime for surface plasmon modes of graphene and BP assisted by coupled mode theory (CMT). The linear and nonlinear plasmonic modes of graphene and BP can be modified by changing Fermi energy and refractive index of medium. The polarization-resolved second and third harmonic generation emission were also analyzed. Furthermore, we study the relation progress with topics: graphene plasmonic logic gate, graphene devices with bright visible light emission, photothermal therapy, and plasmonic nonamer antenna-graphene phototransistor, etc. Finally, we design the 2D material array chips, which illustrate the graphene and BP plasmonic nonlinear photonics nanoplatform with its applications and perspectives.

2 Plasmonic nonlinearity and theoretical background

In this section, we introduce the concepts of conductivity for graphene and BP plasmonic. We start with a brief description of the surface conductivity and nonlinear optical processes of graphene and BP tunable plasmonic. Finally, we continue with a more discussion of a lifetime using CMT.

2.1 Optical conductivity of graphene and BP

The optical feature of graphene can be expressed by the surface conductivity σgra composed of the intraband part and the interband part, σgra=σintra+σinter [115]. The intraband electron-photon scattering contribution can be described by:

(1)σintra(ω)=ie2kBTπ2(ωiτ1)[EfkBT+2ln(eEfkBT+1)]

The interband transition contribution is described by:

(2)σinter(ω)=ie24πln[2|Ef|(ω+iτ1)2|Ef|+(ω+iτ1)]

In addition, for the case including ћω>>kBT and |Ef|>>kBT, in the mid-infrared and THz frequency region, the optical feature of graphene can be expressed by the surface conductivity σgra [116]:

(3)σgra(ω)=ie2Ef/[π2(ωiτ1)]

Here, the carrier relaxation time is τ=(μEf)/(f2). The Boltzmann’s constant, reduced Planck’s constant, temperature, electric charge, Fermi velocity, Fermi energy or chemical potential, and carrier mobility are kB, ħ, T, e, νf, Ef, and μ, respectively. The transient optical conductivity and dielectric function of 2D material samples can be experimentally measured [116], [117], [118]. The linear electric current response of the graphene in Maxwell equations is given by J=σgra(ω)E/Δ. The thickness of 2D material is set as Δ.

For another BP material, the electronic density ns of BP is given by a diagonal tensor:

(4)ns=(m100m2)kBTdπ2ln[1+exp(EfEckBT)]

where m1 and m2 denote the in-plane electron effective masses near the Γ point within the Hamiltonian model. m1 and m2 can be written with m1=ћ2/(2γ2/Δ+ηc) and m2=ћ2/vc. Conduction band edge energy is noted with Ec. The conductivity of few-layer BP is given as [119], [120]:

(5)σj=iDj/(π(ω+iηe/),Dj=πe2nsj/mj(j=1,2)

where, Dj=πe2nsj/mj is the Drude weight along the j-axis, and j denotes the x or y direction. ηe describes the scattering rate. The BP flake is treated as a thin layer with the anisotropic Drude model. The linear electric current of the BP in Maxwell equations is given by Jj=σjE/Δ.

2.2 Nonlinear optical processes of 2D materials

The electromagnetic response of the 2D materials is determined by the polarization P(r, t). In order to study the second-order and third-order nonlinearity of an optical medium, the polarization P(r, t) of the 2D materials is expanded in the power series using the electric dipole approximation [121], [122]: P(r, t)=ϵ0χ(1)(r, t).E(r, t)+χ(2)(r, t): E(r, t) E(r, t)+χ(3)(r, t):E(r, t)E(r, t)E(r, t), where, χ(i) is the i-th-order susceptibility.

2.2.1 Second-order nonlinearity of graphene and BP

For the second-order nonlinearity of 2D materials such as graphene and BP, the incident electromagnetic field is composed of two monochromatic plane waves with frequencies ω1 and ω2:

(6)E(r,t)=E1ei(k1rω1t)E2ei(k1rω2t)

where k1 and k2 are the corresponding wave vectors. For the second-order nonlinear polarization P(2)(r, t), we can obtain:

(7)P(2)(r,t)=ε0χ(2)(r,t):[E1E1e2i(k1rω1t)+E2E2e2i(k2rω2t)2E1E2ei[(k1+k2)r(ω1+ω2)t]+2E1E2ei[(k1k2)r(ω1ω2)t]+cc]+2ε0χ(2)(r,t):(E1E1+E2E2)

The terms in the Eq. (7) have the second-order nonlinearity including SHG at 2ω1 and 2ω2, difference frequency generation (DFG) at (ω2ω1), sum frequency generation (SFG) at (ω1+ω2) and optical rectification, respectively. The last term of the right side in Eq. (7) is a static polarization. The polarization P(2)(r, t) in Eq. (7) describes the nonlinear optical processes in 2D materials, including SHG, SFG, and DFG.

The local response approximation model, such as the Drude model, is used to model metal plasmonic nanostructures. Nowadays, nanoscale fabrication techniques for 2D material plasmonic nanodevices allow us to investigate the new phenomena occurring in physical regimes of 2D materials. When an optical field strongly couples to a 2D material plasmonic structure, it interacts with free electrons resulting in intrinsic nonlinear optical response including SHG, SFG, DFG effects, and other higher harmonic generation.

The linear and second-order nonlinear optical responses between light and BP are described by Maxwell equations. The second-order nonlinear theory of the 2D material plasmonic nanostructures is based on the nonlinear Lorentz force like that in metal. The electrons are described by the velocity field ue(r, t) and electronic number density ne(r, t). The total electronic charge density is defined as ene(r, t)=[en0(r)–ρ(r, t)]. The electronic current density was defined with the following equation: j(r, t)=−eneue=(ρen0)ue. The force density F consists of the electric and magnetic part of the Lorentz force, and force density F has the term: F=−ene(E+ueB)–meγneue. The evolution for electronic current density is expressed with: j/∂t=−e/meF–∑k(jjk/(en0ρ)/∂rk.

Instead of the force density F in the expression, j/∂t yields the time derivative for nonlinear current density:

(8)jt=γj+βE+krk(jjken0ρ)eme[ρE+j×B]

The second-order nonlinear source S(2) for second-order nonlinearity can be described with:

(9)S(2)=krk(j(1)jk(1)en0)eme[ε0(E(1))E(1)+j(1)×B(1)]

Here, k is noted as the coordinates x, y, and z. The variables j(1), B(1), and E(1) is the current density, magnetic flux intensity, and electric field vector of fundamental frequency wave (FFW), respectively, which are noted with superscript (1). me and n0 stand for effective electron mass and ion density, respectively. The S(2) is the nonlinear source of second harmonic wave (SHW) noted with superscript (2). The electric part and magnetic part of the Lorentz force contribute to the nonlinear optics. Using the electric dipole approximation, the electric field of SHW can be related to the fundamental frequency wave:

(10)E(2)(2ω)χ(2)E(1)(ω)E(1)(ω)

where χ(2) is the susceptibility of the second-order nonlinear for graphene and BP.

2.2.2 Third-order nonlinearity of graphene

The third-order nonlinear optical property in ultra-thin graphene plasmonics is investigated here. The Kerr effect of the third-order nonlinear polarization of graphene is expressed as following:

(11)P(3)(ω)=3ε0χ(3)|E(ω)|2E(ω)

In Eq. (11), the third-order susceptibility χ(3) can be obtained in nonlinear graphene or BP materials.

The graphene lattice with D6h space group is centrosymmetric. A direct implication of this property is that second-order nonlinearity is forbidden. However, nonlinearity for THG is allowed and particularly strong in graphene. The quadratic optical nonlinearity of graphene can be described using the nonlinear optical conductivity tensor σ3. The current density of the third-order nonlinearity is j3nl(r, t)=σ3E(r, t)|E(r, t)|2. The third-order optical conductivity has a dependence on the frequency and Fermi energy. The nonlinear conductivity σ3 of graphene has the following form [123], [124], [125]:

(12)σ3(ω)=i3e2(νfe)2/(32πEfω3)

Here, the imaginary part of the nonlinear conductivity σ3 is negative, which describes the self-focusing type nonlinear response in graphene [126]. Both linear conductivity σgra and σ3 nonlinear conductivity are highly dependent on Fermi energy, which could provide a way to get an electrically controlled optical bistability [127]. After considering the nonlinear effect of graphene, the conductivity σ of graphene can be written as σ=σgra+σ3|E(r, t)|2, and the dielectric constant of graphene can be set as ε=εgra+χ(3)|E(r, t)|2.

2.2.3 Third-order nonlinearity of BP

In the space group, BP has an orthorhombic crystal structure. For an orthorhombic crystal exhibiting THG, the contracted third-order nonlinear susceptibility tensor of BP can be written as follows [128]:

(13)χBP=[χ110000χ160χ18000χ220χ240000χ29000χ330χ350χ37000]

where “1, 2, 3” is the first subscript, which refers to “x, y, z,” respectively. The second subscript signifies the following meaning in Table 1. In our paper, the BP sheet is set along the x-y plane. If we only excite the x-y plane, all components containing a “z” term can be set as zero. Only non-zero elements (χ11, χ22, χ18, χ29) can determine the third-order nonlinearity of BP. So, the output electric field intensity can be expressed as follows:

Table 1:

List of the second subscript “m” number meaning in third-order susceptibility uses in Eq. (13) such as χ29 (second subscript is 9).

jklxxxyyyzzzyzzyyzxzzxxzxyyxxyxyz
m1234567890
(14)Ex2[χ11cos3(θ)+χ18cos(θ)sin2(θ)]2
(15)Ey2[χ22sin3(θ)+χ29sin(θ) cos2(θ)]2

Here, θ is the polarization angle.

2.3 The linear and nonlinear coupled mode theory

The coupled mode theory has a long history of application in optics, where it offers a good description on the propagation of light in a set of coupled linear and nonlinear optical waveguides. The characteristics of the SP mode can be analyzed with the CMT method. The resonance modes have the energy amplitude Am (m=1, 2, 3), where dAm/dt=−iωAm. The incoming and outgoing waves are depicted by S±,in(out). The amplitude Am has the expression [129], [130]:

(16)dAmdt=(iωm1τim1τwm)Am+S+,in1τwm+S,in1τwmpmiμmpAp

where, τim is the lifetime of decay process due to the intrinsic loss for the m-th mode. τwm is the lifetime of energy coupling process for the m-th mode. μmp (m, p=1, 2, 3 and mp) is the coupling coefficient between the three resonant modes. The absorption of the 2D materials system can be expressed as:

(17)A(ω,Ef)=1|t|2|r|2

where the transmission function of 2D material plasmonic system is: t(ω, Ef)=1–[(τw1) −1/2+(τi1)−1/2) P1/P0–[(τw2)−1/2+(τi2)−1/2)P2/P0–[(τw3)−1/2+(τi3)−1/2)P3/P0. In addition, the reflection function is r(ω, Ef)=−(τw1)−1/2 P1/P0–(τw2)−1/2P2/P0–(τw3)−1/2P3/P0. P0, P1, P2, and P3 are the functions of ω, ωm, τim, τwm, and μmp. After adjusting the parameters of τwm, τim, and μmp, we can precisely compare the intensity, resonant wavelength, and spectral width of absorption peaks A(ω) in Eq. (17) with that of the absorption spectrum simulated by the FDTD method. Then, we can choose the appropriate value of the parameters ωm, τim, and τwm. The theoretical descriptions and data fitting will make it useful in applying the methods for future 2D material plasmonic applications.

In particular, for a second-order nonlinearity with mode ωs,1 and its second harmonic ωs,2, the amplitudes as,1 and as,2 of the nonlinear coupled mode equations take the following form:

(18)das,1dt=(iωs,11τs,i11τs,w1)as,1+S+,in1τs,w1+S,in1τs,w1iωs,1β1as,1as,2
(19)das,2dt=(iωs,21τs,i21τs,w2)as,2+S+,in1τs,w2+S,in1τs,w2iωs,2β2as,12

Similarly, for a third-order nonlinearity with mode ωt,1 and its third harmonic mode ωt,3, the amplitudes at,1 and at,3 of the coupled mode equations take the form:

(20)dat,1dt=[iωt,1(1+η11|at,1|2+η13|at,3|2)1τt,i11τt,w1]at,1+S+,in1τt,w1+S,in1τt,w1iωt,1β1(at,1)2at,3
(21)dat,3dt=[iωt,3(1+η33|at,3|2+η31|at,1|2)1τt,i31τt,w3]at,3+S+,in1τt,w3+S,in1τt,w3iωt,3β3(at,1)3

In derivative equations of at,1 and at,3, one kind of nonlinearity depends on one of the field amplitudes. For the χ(3) nonlinearity, this effect is known as self-phase and cross-phase modulation. Another kind of nonlinearity originates from transferring energy between the modes [131].

3 Surface plasmons and their nonlinearity in graphene and BP

A single layer of graphene sample was grown on a copper foil [132]. The doping of the graphene layer was controlled by changing the duration of nitric acid vapor treatment. The reflectance R of the samples was measured with a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer. The absorptivity can be obtained with A=1–R. The angle-selective perfect light absorption was experimentally achieved in Figure 1A.

Figure 1: Angle-selective, grating-selective absorption and their lifetime in graphene structure.(A) The angle-selective absorption and the planar graphene structure [132]. (B) The nanostructured DGN surrounded with substrate and superstrate such as aqueous solution. (C) The simulated linear-optical absorption with FDTD simulation (black circles) and the theoretical CMT analysis results (red line). τw1, τw2, τi1, and τi2 various with (D) Fermi energy Ef and (E) refractive index n1.
Figure 1:

Angle-selective, grating-selective absorption and their lifetime in graphene structure.

(A) The angle-selective absorption and the planar graphene structure [132]. (B) The nanostructured DGN surrounded with substrate and superstrate such as aqueous solution. (C) The simulated linear-optical absorption with FDTD simulation (black circles) and the theoretical CMT analysis results (red line). τw1, τw2, τi1, and τi2 various with (D) Fermi energy Ef and (E) refractive index n1.

Construction of such an angle-selective absorption structure is important for the applications such as energy harvesting, photo-detection, and sensing. The weak light absorption of the graphene layer hinders their application for the incident angle around θ=0°. The light absorption in graphene or BP can also be tuned with the grating structure below. The two-dimensional material-based tunable plasmonic nonlinear photonics nanoplatform can be established based on the grating structure or other strong light-matter interaction systems.

3.1 Linear and nonlinearity of graphene plasmonic

Graphene has a gate-voltage-dependent feature that the Fermi energy of graphene can be tuned dynamically using the bias voltage. We consider a periodic grating, formed by the double graphene nanoribbon (DGN) arrays, which has a lattice constant L=200 nm in the xy-plane. The graphene grating is placed on the dielectric substrate as shown in Figure 1B. The graphene nanoribbons have the cuboid shape (length×width×thickness) with L1×L2×Δ. The graphene nanoribbons are set as length L1=160 nm, width L2=40 nm, and thickness Δ=2 nm. Other parameters of the graphene are chosen as νf=106 m/s, μ=10,000 cm2/(V·s), and Ef=0.64 eV. Using the FDTD method and CMT theory, the absorption (marked with red dotted) of the DGN grating is investigated in Figure 1C. The theoretical CMT results (black line) are in accordance with the FDTD simulation (red dotted).

The lifetime τwm and τim (m=1, 2) can be modulated with the Fermi energy Ef and refractive index n1 in Figure 1D and E, respectively. The lifetimes τwm and τim (m=1, 2) strongly depend on the parameter of Fermi energy Ef, which can be through doping or an applied gate voltage, thus, resulting in the sensing application with applied voltage bias. The lifetimes τw1, τw2, τi1, and τi2 can be modulated with the refractive index n1 of the superstrate. The theoretical descriptions of the tunable lifetime will make it useful in applying the theory for future 2D material-sensing applications by changing the refractive index n1 of the superstrate such as aqueous solution.

For example, the incident electromagnetic field is composed of two monochrome plane waves. The incident electric field with two frequencies ω1 and ω2 can be written as:

(22)E(1)(r,t)=E0(1)(r)(eiω1t+eiω2t)

In the case of the incident wavelengths λ1=4.4 μm and λ2=4.9 μm in Figure 2A, the second-order nonlinearity including SHG as well as SFG and DFG can be obtained in Figure 2B. We can obtain the SHW including SHG (λ3=2.2 μm, λ4=2.45 μm) as well as the SFG (λ5=2.32 μm) and DFG (λ6=38.6 μm) in Figure 2B. The second-order nonlinear conversion efficiency is large compared to that in single graphene nanoribbon grating.

Figure 2: Wavelength and polarization dependent SHG of nanostructured DGN.(A) The amplitude of Fourier spectrum for FFW Ex(1) with two wavelengths λ1 and λ2 for the nanostructured DGN. (B) The amplitude of Fourier spectrum for SHW Ex(2) with the four wavelengths λ3, λ4, λ5, and λ6. (C) Lifetime of FFW at λ1 and λ2 changing with time. (D) Lifetime of SHW at λ3, λ4, and λ5 changing with time. The polarization state of total electric field energy (|E|2) for second harmonic emission at (E) λ3, (F) λ4, (G) λ5, and (H) λ6 from an array of DGN illuminated with an x-polarized plane wave at the fundamental frequency λ1 and λ2.
Figure 2:

Wavelength and polarization dependent SHG of nanostructured DGN.

(A) The amplitude of Fourier spectrum for FFW Ex(1) with two wavelengths λ1 and λ2 for the nanostructured DGN. (B) The amplitude of Fourier spectrum for SHW Ex(2) with the four wavelengths λ3, λ4, λ5, and λ6. (C) Lifetime of FFW at λ1 and λ2 changing with time. (D) Lifetime of SHW at λ3, λ4, and λ5 changing with time. The polarization state of total electric field energy (|E|2) for second harmonic emission at (E) λ3, (F) λ4, (G) λ5, and (H) λ6 from an array of DGN illuminated with an x-polarized plane wave at the fundamental frequency λ1 and λ2.

Let us now assume that the incident field is composed of two short pluses. The short pluses with two central frequencies ω1 and ω2 can be written as E(1)(t)=exp(−(tt0)/(td)) (eiω1t+eiω2t), where t0 is the delay of time, and td=200 fs. For Fermi energy Ef=0.64 eV, the time evolution of lifetimes for FFW at wavelengths λ1 and λ2 are shown in Figure 2C. In addition, time evolution of lifetimes for SHW at wavelengths λ3, λ4, and λ5 are shown in Figure 2D [133]. The carrier dynamic of a saturable absorber plays an important role to determine how a short pulse can be produced in passively mode-locked laser.

Illuminated with an x-polarized plane wave at the fundamental frequencies λ1 and λ2, the polarization state of the second harmonic emission for total electric field energy (|E|2) at (e) λ3, (f) λ4, (g) λ5, and (h) λ6 from an array of double graphene nanoribbons are shown in Figure 2E–H. The second harmonic signal is a function of the measuring angle (not the polarization of the incident field) θ=0 corresponds to the x direction.

Here, we consider the third-order nonlinear optical property in nonlinear 2D material graphene plasmonics. In the case of the incident wavelengths λ1=4.4 μm, the THG signal of the total electric field energy (|E|2) with three different Fermi energies Ef=0.4 eV, 0.6 eV, and 0.8 eV are shown in Figure 3A. The polar diagram of the polarization state of the second harmonic emission at λ1/3 and Ef=0.6 eV is shown in Figure 3B. In addition, the polarization state of the second harmonic emission for the total electric field energy (|E|2) at λ1/3 is a function of the measuring angle (not the polarization of the incident field θ=0) corresponding to the x direction.

Figure 3: Polarization and Fermi energy dependent THG in sandwiched graphene sheet.(A) THG signal of total electric field energy (|E|2) for three different Fermi energies Ef=0.4 eV, 0.6 eV, and 0.8 eV of FW mode at λ1 in the nanostructured DGN. (B) Polar diagram of polarization state of the second harmonic emission at λ1/3. (C) The sandwiched graphene sheet structure surrounded with substrate and superstrate dielectric. The dependencies of the transmitted electric field on the input electric field at a wavelength of 60 μm for different (D) Fermi energies and (E) index of superstrate dielectric.
Figure 3:

Polarization and Fermi energy dependent THG in sandwiched graphene sheet.

(A) THG signal of total electric field energy (|E|2) for three different Fermi energies Ef=0.4 eV, 0.6 eV, and 0.8 eV of FW mode at λ1 in the nanostructured DGN. (B) Polar diagram of polarization state of the second harmonic emission at λ1/3. (C) The sandwiched graphene sheet structure surrounded with substrate and superstrate dielectric. The dependencies of the transmitted electric field on the input electric field at a wavelength of 60 μm for different (D) Fermi energies and (E) index of superstrate dielectric.

The sandwiched graphene structure is composed of two dielectric layers and a single graphene layer in Figure 3C. There was a weak light absorption of the 2D material layer for the incident angle around θ=0o as shown in Figure 1A. Here, we consider the incident angle θ=75o. The refraction index of dielectric 2 and dielectric 3 is n2 and n3, respectively. Dielectrics 1 and 4 are set as air. The thicknesses of dielectric slabs 2 and 3 are set as d2 and d3, respectively. The graphene layer is sandwiched between the superstrate and substrate dielectric slab 2 and slab 3. Without considering the external field and under the random-phase approximation, the surface conductivity of the graphene is σgra=σ0. The nonlinear surface conductivity of graphene is σ3. Ei, Et, and Er are the amplitude of incident, transmitted and reflected magnetic fields, respectively. An amplitude Ei of a plane wave is incident on the graphene structure at the incident angle θ.

The x axis is parallel along with the graphene layer, and the z axis is norm to the graphene layer. The electric fields and magnetic field in dielectric layers 1, 2, 3, and 4 are noted as (E1x, E1z, H1y), (E2x, E2z, H2y), (E3x, E3z, H3y), and (E4x, E4z, H4y), respectively. In addition, kx=k0n1sinθ, and kjz=sqrt(k02njkx2), j=1, 2, 3, 4. θ is the incident angle. By considering the boundary condition of electromagnetic field at position z=−d2, 0, d3, there is the relation of transmitted electric field and incident electric field Et and Ei: |Ei|2=|Et|2|U(Et)|2. Clearly, the incident electric field is the function of the transmitted electric field, and hence, optical bistability can be obtained with appropriate conditions [134], [135]. The dependencies of the transmitted electric field on the input electric field at wavelength 60 μm for the different Fermi energies and index of superstrate dielectric as shown in Figure 3D and E, respectively.

The plasmonic devices were fabricated with chemical vapor deposition-grown monolayer graphene that was transferred onto a silicon oxide on lightly doped silicon in Figure 4A. Figure 4B illustrates the experimental setup that was used to investigate the nonlinear terahertz response. Measured relative change in various transmissions with pump-probe time delay Δt is depicted for several pump fluences in Figure 4C. In all cases, the pump causes an increase in transmission, which is accompanied with a decrease in absorption [133]. The observed nonlinear response decays is about 10 ps.

Figure 4: Pump probe measurements of graphene gratings on SiO2 Substrate [133].(A) Cross-sectional diagram of device with graphene grating on SiO2. (B) Experimental setup for the pump-probe measurements. (C) Measured relative change in transmission along the time axis Δt under different pump fluencies [133].
Figure 4:

Pump probe measurements of graphene gratings on SiO2 Substrate [133].

(A) Cross-sectional diagram of device with graphene grating on SiO2. (B) Experimental setup for the pump-probe measurements. (C) Measured relative change in transmission along the time axis Δt under different pump fluencies [133].

The strong enhancement of light absorption in graphene can be realized using periodically patterned structure and optical graphene-cavity system [136]. The polarization directions of input and output light are shown in Figure 5A. The monolayer graphene reduces the cavity reflection and reduces the cavity quality factor. The cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy is obtained in the graphene sample. The attenuation at the peak of reflection increases with 20 dB by inserting a graphene layer in Figure 5B. The graphene’s complex refractive index can also be measured in the coupled graphene-cavity system.

Figure 5: SHG measurement results of graphene-cavity structure [136].(A) Cross-polarization confocal microscope. HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarized beam splitter. (B) Reflection before and after the deposition of graphene. Inset: attenuation of the cavity with graphene [136]. (C) Schematic of SHG measurements in transmission mode in graphene/gold nanohole array/glass substrate structure. (D) The SHG image is collected for the graphene-coated sieve by a CCD camera [137].
Figure 5:

SHG measurement results of graphene-cavity structure [136].

(A) Cross-polarization confocal microscope. HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarized beam splitter. (B) Reflection before and after the deposition of graphene. Inset: attenuation of the cavity with graphene [136]. (C) Schematic of SHG measurements in transmission mode in graphene/gold nanohole array/glass substrate structure. (D) The SHG image is collected for the graphene-coated sieve by a CCD camera [137].

The second-order susceptibility χ(2) of graphene/gold nanohole array/glass structure [137] was studied with different polarizations in Figure 5C. The SHG image was collected with the graphene-coated sieve by a CCD camera in Figure 5D. The second-order susceptibility of the experimental results depends on the Fermi level and can be retrieved with a simple classical model χeff(2)=e/(2meω2)(eω–1). The second-order susceptibility χ(2) can be controlled with Fermi level, which is the advantage of graphene plasmonic compared with that of conventional metal.

3.2 Linearity and nonlinearity of BP plasmonic

We considered a nanostructured BP nanoflake with period P=200 nm in the xy-plane. The BP square array is placed on the SiO2 substrate in Figure 6A. The BP nanoflake is shown in Figure 6B. The two BP nanoflakes have a cuboid shape (length×width×thickness) with L×L×Δ. The parameters about the BP flake are set as side length L=70 nm and thickness Δ=2 nm. The superstrate is the dielectric with refractive index n1. For the nanostructured BP in the mid-IR and far-IR wavelength regimes, the parameters can be set as follows: the band gap Δ is about 0.8 eV for thickness d=2 nm, and the band gap is thickness dependent. εr=5.76, γ=4a/πeV.m (a=0.223 nm is scale length), ηc=ћ2/(0.4 m0), vc=ћ2/(0.7 m0), ηe=10−3 eV, and EfEc=0.6 eV. The electron mass m0=9.10938×10−31 kg.

Figure 6: Absorption, FFW, SHW and lifetime of FFW in nanostructured BP.(A) The nanostructured BP nanoflake on SiO2 substrate. (B) The atomic arrangement of the BP structure. (C) The linear-optical absorption with FDTD simulation (black circles) and the theoretical CMT (red line). (D) The amplitude of Fourier spectrum for FFW Ex(1) with two wavelengths peaks λ1 and λ2. (E) Amplitude of Fourier spectrum for SHW Ex(2) with the three wavelengths peaks λ3, λ4, and λ5. (F) Lifetime τw1, τw2, τi1, and τi2 as a function of various relative Fermi energies (Ef–Ec).
Figure 6:

Absorption, FFW, SHW and lifetime of FFW in nanostructured BP.

(A) The nanostructured BP nanoflake on SiO2 substrate. (B) The atomic arrangement of the BP structure. (C) The linear-optical absorption with FDTD simulation (black circles) and the theoretical CMT (red line). (D) The amplitude of Fourier spectrum for FFW Ex(1) with two wavelengths peaks λ1 and λ2. (E) Amplitude of Fourier spectrum for SHW Ex(2) with the three wavelengths peaks λ3, λ4, and λ5. (F) Lifetime τw1, τw2, τi1, and τi2 as a function of various relative Fermi energies (EfEc).

The normalized linear-optical absorption [138] (black circles) of FFW through the nanostructured BP flake is investigated with the FDTD simulation as shown in Figure 6C. The theoretical CMT result is noted with a red line in Figure 6C. For the incident fundamental wave at two different wavelengths λ1=4.35 μm and λ2=5.1 μm in Figure 6D, we can obtain the SHW including SHG (λ3=2.18 μm, λ4=2.55 μm) as well as SFG (λ5=2.36 μm) in Figure 6E.

The conversion efficiency η of the second-order nonlinearity is about 10−10. The second-order nonlinear conversion efficiency is larger than that in the single BP nanoflake grating [111]. The strongly enhanced electric field and noncentrosymmetry increase the signals of second-order nonlinearity. In the process of energy coupling between each mode and light field, the lifetime τw1 and τw2 of the plasmon modes with various relative Fermi energies (EfEc) are shown in Figure 6F. In the process of intrinsic loss for the m-th mode, the lifetime for τi1 and τi2 with various (EfEc) is also shown in Figure 6F. The intensity, wavelengths, and spectral width of the resonance peaks can be precisely modulated with the Fermi energy here. Enhanced absorption can be obtained using the periodically patterned structures and grapheme cavity [139], [140]. We present a theoretical framework for calculating the lifetime of BP surface plasmon modes here. The carrier dynamics with two different decay times, 873 fs and 96.9 ps, and nonlinear optical properties were experimentally investigated in the quasi-BP system via transient transport and the Z-scan method [141]. The investigation of wavelength conversion and all-optical switching in the BP analog 2D material could be helpful for all optical signal processes [142].

According to the angle-resolved pump-probe reflection spectroscopy, the dynamical response for BP under ultrafast photo excitation is studied in Figure 7A. Under pump polarization along 0° and probe polarization at 90°, the relative change in transient reflection as a function of pump-probe time delay Δt is measured as shown in Figure 7B. The data is fitted using the biexponential decay function with two decay time constants: τ1=5.96 ps, τ2=87.6 ps [143]. This experimental work provides a way for understanding angle-sensitive properties of BP-based devices. The anisotropic third harmonic generation with third-order susceptibility χ(3) about χ(3)=1.64×10−19 m2 V−2 in exfoliated BP was studied using a fast scanning multiphoton characterization method in Figure 7C. The exfoliated samples of BP were prepared with mechanical exfoliation in bulk BP with scotch magic tape onto glass or SiO2/Si substrates. The thickness of a BP flake is 26 nm. Then, the samples were encapsulated using an AlOx coating grown. The THG was measured with a multiphoton microscope. A description of the equipment for experimental measurement is shown in Figure 7D. The polar plot of the measured angular dependence of the THG from a BP flake on a substrate is shown in Figure 7E. After the polarized Raman measurements, the red and purple arrows indicate the AC and ZZ crystal directions [144].

Figure 7: Polarization dependent linear reflection contrast and THG spectra of BP flake [143], [144].(A) Polarization-resolved reflection experiment. (B) Measured relative change in reflection varying with pump-probe time delay Δt (arrow: pump polarization along 0° and 90°) [143]. The data is fitted with biexponential decay function (decay time constants: τ1=5.96 ps, τ2=87.6 ps). (C) The THG of BP flake. (D) The experiment measurement equipment for THG. (E) Polar plot of the measured angular dependence of the THG from a 26-nm BP flake on a glass substrate. The red and purple arrows indicate the AC and ZZ crystal directions obtained from polarized Raman measurements [144].
Figure 7:

Polarization dependent linear reflection contrast and THG spectra of BP flake [143], [144].

(A) Polarization-resolved reflection experiment. (B) Measured relative change in reflection varying with pump-probe time delay Δt (arrow: pump polarization along 0° and 90°) [143]. The data is fitted with biexponential decay function (decay time constants: τ1=5.96 ps, τ2=87.6 ps). (C) The THG of BP flake. (D) The experiment measurement equipment for THG. (E) Polar plot of the measured angular dependence of the THG from a 26-nm BP flake on a glass substrate. The red and purple arrows indicate the AC and ZZ crystal directions obtained from polarized Raman measurements [144].

The nonlinear optical response of oxidized black phosphorus (OBP) was experimentally investigated using femtosecond Z-scan technology. The ultrafast nonlinear optics is obtained in the few-layer OBP. The saturable absorption and self-defocusing are observed here. These optical properties are useful in many optoelectronic devices, such as mode locker, wavelength converter, optical switch, and laser beam shaper.

If we only consider the exciting third-order nonlinearity of BP in the x-y plane here, we can set all components that contain a z term to zero in the third-order nonlinear susceptibility tensor in Eq. (13) [128]. Only four non-zero matrix elements (χ11, χ22, χ18, χ29) are left, which determine the THG in BP. Because the third-harmonic electric field is proportional to the nonlinear susceptibility, we can write the THG output intensity as follows: Ex2∝[χ11cos3(θ)+χ18cos(θ)sin2(θ)]2 and Ey2∝[χ22sin3(θ)+χ29sin(θ)cos2(θ)]2, where θ is the polarization angle for the x-axis of the BP crystal. The solid lines in Figure 8B are fitted to the measured intensity in Figure 8A in the x and y directions using the relationships. One can see good agreement with the overall fit, excluding some asymmetry in the |Ey|2 data. This asymmetry is likely caused by some residual polarization dependence in the transmission of the dichroic mirror that we were not able to account for during the measurement. The calculated THG current induced in BP is also shown in Figure 8C.

Figure 8: Anisotropic THG in multilayer BP [128].(A) Dependence of THG on the incident polarization. Zero degrees corresponds to the x-axis (armchair direction) of the BP crystal. (B) The same data as in (A) with theoretical fits to the intensity polarized in the x (black squares) and y (red dots) directions. Blue triangles correspond to the total intensity. (C) Calculated THG current induced in BP. (D) Atomic force microscopy image of a BP flake containing many layers with various thicknesses. (E) Position-dependent THG signal measured by scanning the position of the beam relative to the sample. Different thicknesses can be resolved via contrast in the THG signal.
Figure 8:

Anisotropic THG in multilayer BP [128].

(A) Dependence of THG on the incident polarization. Zero degrees corresponds to the x-axis (armchair direction) of the BP crystal. (B) The same data as in (A) with theoretical fits to the intensity polarized in the x (black squares) and y (red dots) directions. Blue triangles correspond to the total intensity. (C) Calculated THG current induced in BP. (D) Atomic force microscopy image of a BP flake containing many layers with various thicknesses. (E) Position-dependent THG signal measured by scanning the position of the beam relative to the sample. Different thicknesses can be resolved via contrast in the THG signal.

The third harmonic generation in BP is observed using an ultrafast NIR laser. The THG experiment results are observed using atomic force microscopy in Figure 8D. The third harmonic emission is dependent on the incident polarization. In addition, the third harmonic emission varies with the number of layers due to phase-matching condition and signal depletion. To prepare the samples, the author used Scotch tape to exfoliate single-crystal BP onto glass slides covered with polydimethylsiloxane. A femtosecond, near-IR fiber laser was used as the pump to probe the THG response of the samples. A short-pass dichroic filter was used to reflect the fundamental frequency toward the sample while passing the third harmonic. Position-dependent THG signal is measured by scanning the position of the beam relative to the sample in Figure 8E. Different thicknesses can be resolved via contrast in the THG signal. An integrated optical device composed of an erbium-doped fiber, coupler, isolator, SA, and wavelength division multiplexer is studied [145]. A mechanically exfoliated BP was fabricated to realize the optical SA, which can be applied in the field such as ultra fast laser and ultra fast photonics [89], [146], [147], [148].

4 Application and perspectives for graphene and BP plasmonics

The graphene and BP plasmonic have become a fertile ground for the connection of the nonlinear photonics community and their application. The graphene plasmonic has tunability because the carriers can be controlled with electrical doping and bias voltage. The graphene plasmonic logic gate and dual-gate BP FET are based on the tunability of surface plasmons with bias voltage. Graphene-based tunable plasmonic linear and nonlinear photonics also have the bright visible light emission. Moreover, plasmonic-induced hot electronics and quantum dot p-doping can be used to create a diode and an n-p-n transistor. Graphene and BP plasmonic-based tunable linear and nonlinear photonics play an important role in the nanoplatform with the various linear or nonlinear optical phenomena and their applications.

Graphene plasmonic logic gates were studied at the mid-infrared wavelengths in Figure 9A [149]. The electro-optical graphene plasmonic modes are controlled by an external gate voltage. Graphene plasmonic logic gates are superior to the conventional optical logic gates. The six basic logic gates (i.e. NOR/AND, XNOR/XOR, NAND/OR) are designed. The state of “ON/OFF” of each input channel can be controlled by tuning the optical conductivity of graphene. The six basic logic gates can also be controlled with the external gate voltage. This structure of graphene logic gate is compact, and the geometrical size is small. The graphene plasmonic logic gates have an important application in photonic integrated circuits [152].

Figure 9: Graphene plasmonic logic gate, blue OLED in BP FET and visible light emission in graphene [149], [150], [151].(A) Basic switching unit of the graphene plasmonic MZI logic gate [149]. (B) Schematic 3D view of the dual-gate BP FET. (C) Photographic images display blue OLED under turn-off and -on states [150]. (D) The suspended monolayer graphene devices with bright visible light emission under electrically bias voltage. (E) ID-VSD relation in graphene. Solid curves are the calculated results with the transport model [151].
Figure 9:

Graphene plasmonic logic gate, blue OLED in BP FET and visible light emission in graphene [149], [150], [151].

(A) Basic switching unit of the graphene plasmonic MZI logic gate [149]. (B) Schematic 3D view of the dual-gate BP FET. (C) Photographic images display blue OLED under turn-off and -on states [150]. (D) The suspended monolayer graphene devices with bright visible light emission under electrically bias voltage. (E) ID-VSD relation in graphene. Solid curves are the calculated results with the transport model [151].

A dual-gate FET with a 12-nm-thin BP channel was fabricated on a glass substrate in Figure 9B. The Al2O3 dielectrics, which were 30-nm thick, were deposited on the top and bottom of the BP channel. In addition, BP FETs have a patterned Au-gate architecture out of the Al2O3 dielectric layers. TopAl2O3 dielectric was also used as an encapsulation layer for the FET device. The measured maximum ON currents were about 5 μA and 50 μA at drain voltages of −0.1 V and −1 V, respectively. The dual-gate BP FETs can nicely demonstrate the OLED switching for green OLED and particularly for blue OLED. The dual-gate BP FETs also can demonstrate NOR logic functions separately using top-input and bottom-input. The patterned dual gate BP FETs display promising perspectives for light-emitting pixel and logics [150]. The photographic images of blue OLED were displayed under turn-off state and turn-on state as shown in Figure 9C.

Graphene layer is deposited on SiO2 substrates. In the mid infrared frequency range, graphene can act as a low-efficiency emitter with the electrical bias voltage. For electrically biased suspended graphene devices, the bright visible light emission was observed using false-color scanning electron microscopy image in Figure 9D. In these devices, heat transport in graphene is largely reduced because the hot electrons are mainly localized inside the graphene layer. A thermal radiation efficiency has reached 1000-fold enhancement in this structure [151]. The ID-VSD relation for suspended mechanically exfoliated monolayer graphene obtained after the measurement of visible light emission spectra is shown in Figure 9E. Solid curves are the calculated results using the transport. The spontaneous emission (SE) rate of a monolayer 2D material also can be modulated in a planar photonic crystal nanocavity [153].

A monolayer graphene sheet was synthesized by the CVD method on a copper foil. A native oxide layer was thermally grown on a silicon wafer. The graphene was transferred onto the native oxide layer. The drain electrode, source electrode, and plasmonic nonamer antenna was patterned onto the monolayer graphene sheet with EBL and Au evaporation in Figure 10A. The plasmonic nonamer antenna consists of eight gold disks surrounding a larger center disk [154]. A nonamer antenna is located on the graphene sheet with back-gated voltage. Under light irradiation, the hot electrons were generated in the gold nonamer antennas due to plasmon excitation. Then, the hot electrons were injected into the monolayer graphene sheets, which can induce n-type doping in graphene sheets. The scattering and absorption of the plasmonic nonamer antenna are shown in Figure 10B. An interesting concept is the optically induced hot electronics. The distinct regions of an undoped graphene structure can be patterned using plasmonic antennas or quantum dots. Then, illuminated by light with a different (or the same) wavelength, it is possible to create a p-n junction and a simple electronic circuitry. The photons in visible and NIR wavelength region can be converted into electrons in graphene-antenna sandwich photodetector with 800% enhancement of the relative photocurrent [155]. The near field of the antenna enhanced the excitation of the intrinsic graphene electrons due to plasmon resonance. The photocurrent induced by the hot electrons was measured in the graphene-based vertical photodetector [156].

Figure 10: Phototransistor based plasmonic nonamer antenna and graphene hybrid structure [154].(A) Nonamer antenna-graphene phototransistor. (B) FDTD calculated scattering (blue) and absorption (red) of a plasmonic nonamer. Schematic illustration of doped graphene sheet by n-doping and quantum dot p-doping, inducing (C) a diode or (D) an n-p-n transistor, respectively [154].
Figure 10:

Phototransistor based plasmonic nonamer antenna and graphene hybrid structure [154].

(A) Nonamer antenna-graphene phototransistor. (B) FDTD calculated scattering (blue) and absorption (red) of a plasmonic nonamer. Schematic illustration of doped graphene sheet by n-doping and quantum dot p-doping, inducing (C) a diode or (D) an n-p-n transistor, respectively [154].

After the schematic illustration of optically induced hot electronics, a diode and an n-p-n transistor are possible using quantum dot p-doping and nanoantenna n-doping in Figure 10C and D, respectively. Some regions of the undoped graphene structures are covered by plasmonic antennas (tuned to red), while other regions are covered with quantum dots (tuned to blue). When a specific pattern of light with requisite wavelengths illuminates the structure, hot electrons from the plasmonic antennas induce n-doping. In addition, the holes from the quantum dots injected the graphene sheet, which induced p-doping in the graphene layer. In addition, the microsecond doped carrier relaxation time scale could enable the development of a wide variety of optically induced electronics, graphene photodetectors, and graphene switches.

The ultra thin BP nanosheets were prepared by liquid exfoliation of the bulk sample. Thereafter, the stacked flakes were dispersed in IPA liquid, as shown in Figure 11A. An annular pump beam was focused into the Er:YAG. The spiral-propagation symmetry and degeneracy of LG0, +1 and LG0, −1 modes were expected to be broken through introducing different Fresnel reflection losses. The uncoated polished side of BP is used with the discriminating Poynting vectors [157]. Using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer, the interference patterns are recorded in Figure 11B. Through optimizing the position and fine tuning the angle of the BP, the interference fringes could be stable at one handedness when the BP was tilted to 4° (or −3.5°), while this helicity selection mechanism was invalid, and the inference fringes turned into a disordered structure when the tilted angle was close to 0° (as shown in Figure 11C). Thus, we are able to confirm that BP can efficiently function as a helicity controller in this vortex laser [38].

Figure 11: Vortex laser based on a black phosphorus plate [157].(A) BP liquid sample. (B) Experimental setup used to excite the pulsed vortex laser and the intensity profile of the output. (C) The interference patterns with different tilt angles of BP [157].
Figure 11:

Vortex laser based on a black phosphorus plate [157].

(A) BP liquid sample. (B) Experimental setup used to excite the pulsed vortex laser and the intensity profile of the output. (C) The interference patterns with different tilt angles of BP [157].

A liquid exfoliation method was designed to produce phosphorene with a controllable size and layer number in large quantities [67]. The layer number of phosphorene can be determined with the experimental Raman scattering. The linear and nonlinear optical properties of the chemically exfoliated phosphorene were investigated by the Z-scan technique and UV-vis-NIR absorption spectrophotometry. The experimental synthesized ultrasmall BP quantum dots exhibited excellent nonlinear optical response with a modulation depth of 36% and a saturable intensity of 3.3 GW/cm2 with the Z-scan measurement technique [158], [159]. BP quantum dots can act as an ultrafast nonlinear optical saturable absorber, which can be applied in the mode-locked fiber laser [160]. The saturable absorber BP films, fabricated by evaporating the solutions on glass wafers, were attached onto the end facet of a waveguide. A stable Q-switched ultrafast waveguide laser can operate under a pump laser at 810 nm [161]. Compared with traditional therapies, it is noted that BP analog tin sulfide nanosheets can serve as NIR photothermal agents and drug delivery platforms for cancer therapy [162]. Photothermal therapy has great application in cancer immunotherapy. In addition, the formulation of a biomimetic BP quantum dot is prepared to induce cancer cells by laser irradiation to eliminate the metastatic and residual cancer cells [163], [164], [165].

Graphene and BP have an important role in the field of tunable plasmonic nonlinear photonics [166], [167]. The advantage of graphene and BP plasmonic is the tunability of surface plasmons compared to the conventional metal. The linear and nonlinear susceptibility can also be controlled with Fermi level. The graphene nanostructure chips with electrically bias voltages G1 and G2 are designed in Figure 12A. In the graphene or BP chip, bright visible or THz light emission, THz detector, light modulation, switches, superstrate sensing, etc., can be realized in the 2D material-based tunable plasmonic nonlinear photonics nanoplatforms. Figure 12B illustrates the various linear or nonlinear optical phenomenon and their application in graphene and BP-based nanoplatform. The graphene and BP plasmonic can be achieved, which may launch a revolution in nonlinear photonics nanoplatform with the prospects for future related research such as linear and nonlinear photonics [47], [168], [169], [170], [171], ultrafast photonics [172], [173], [174], metamaterials [175], [176], [177], photo-detector [178], [179], [180], [181], [182], [183], [184], [185], [186], [187], [188], [189], saturable absorber [190], cancer therapy [191], [192], [193], [194], [195], [196], [197], photonic diodes [166], supercapacitor [198], [199], and transistor [200]. By designing the graphene and BP-based plasmonic tunable devices, they can be fabricated for novel THz active devices such as light modulation devices [201], [202], [203], [204], switches [179], [205], [206], [207], [208], and biosensors [209], [210], [211]. These impending future developments will be spurred not only by the possibility to discover new 2D materials but also by our increased ability to integrate these material-based tunable plasmonic in novel nonlinear photonics nanodevices [212].

Figure 12: Tunable graphene and BP nonlinear plasmonics photonics nanoplatform.(A) The 2D material array chip applications including the bright visible or THz light emission, THz detector, light modulation, switches, photothermal therapy, biosensors, etc. (B) The illustration of tunable graphene and BP nonlinear plasmonics photonics nanoplatform with the various linear or nonlinear optical phenomenon and their applications.
Figure 12:

Tunable graphene and BP nonlinear plasmonics photonics nanoplatform.

(A) The 2D material array chip applications including the bright visible or THz light emission, THz detector, light modulation, switches, photothermal therapy, biosensors, etc. (B) The illustration of tunable graphene and BP nonlinear plasmonics photonics nanoplatform with the various linear or nonlinear optical phenomenon and their applications.

5 Outlook

In this review, we presented the linear and nonlinear optical properties of graphene and BP-tunable plasmonic modes. We present the theoretical framework for calculating the lifetime of tunable plasmonic modes assisted by the coupled mode theory. The plasmonic conditions and lifetime of graphene and BP plasmonic modes can be modified by electrical and chemical doping, which has an advantage over that of conventional metals. The effect of the Fermi energy on the linear, second-order and third-order nonlinear response is presented in detail. In particular, we presented the linearity and nonlinearty of such 2D material plasmonic using theoretical modeling, simulations, experimental methods, and nonlinear photonic applications. This is a rapidly growing field of science as it has been exciting linear and nonlinear optical phenomena and novel photonic nanodevice applications due to their large surface area-to-volume ratio and fluorescence characteristics. Especially, it also provides an exciting possibility to integrate these 2D materials with medical mark, medical diagnosis, and treatment through their excellent optical response and photothermal properties. There are still some problems that need to be solved. First of all, it is very important to find novel experimental methods to fabricate graphene and BP with uniform large sized, periodic nano-array patterns, great controllability, and high production. Second, the induced mechanism, physical model, and the test approach in graphene and BP nonlinear plasmonic should be established and investigated to achieve smaller side effects and quantum effects. The fabrication and synthesis techniques should enable the manipulation of graphene and BP nonlinear plasmonic down to the molecular and even atomic level. Finally, the plasmonic nanodevices and drug delivery platform should be combined with graphene and BP to achieve better optoelectronic characteristic and therapeutic effects.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 51675174

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11564014

Award Identifier / Grant number: 61865006

Funding statement: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51675174, 11564014, 61865006), Province Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (2017JJ2097, 2019JJ50481), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (18B324), Province Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (2018A030313684), and Scientific Research Fund of Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture Science and Technology Program (2018SF5024).

References

[1] Sun Z, Martinez A, Wang F. Optical modulators with 2D layered materials. Nat Photonics 2016;10:227–38.10.1038/nphoton.2016.15Search in Google Scholar

[2] Liu Y, Wang F, Wang X, et al. Planar carbon nanotube–graphene hybrid films for high-performance broadband photodetectors. Nat Commun 2015;6:8589.10.1038/ncomms9589Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Chen B, Hong L, Hu C, Zhang C, Liu R, Li Z. Engineering quadratic nonlinear photonic crystals for frequency conversion of lasers. J Opt-Uk 2018;20:034009.10.1088/2040-8986/aaaa3aSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Su L, Fan X, Yin T, et al. Inorganic 2D luminescent materials: structure, luminescence modulation, and applications. Adv Opt Mater 2019;8:1900978.10.1002/adom.201900978Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fang K, Yu Z, Fan S. Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation. Nat Photonics 2012;6:782–7.10.1038/nphoton.2012.236Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ge Y, Zhu Z, Xu Y, et al. Ultrafast photonics: broadband nonlinear photoresponse of 2D TiS2 for ultrashort pulse generation and All-Optical thresholding devices (Advanced optical materials 4/2018). Adv Opt Mater 2018;6:1701166.10.1002/adom.201870014Search in Google Scholar

[7] Tao W, Kong N, Ji X, et al. Emerging two-dimensional monoelemental materials (Xenes) for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 2019;48:2891–912.10.1039/C8CS00823JSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Wang C, Li Z, Kim MH, et al. Metasurface-assisted phase-matching-free second harmonic generation in lithium niobate Waveguides. Nat Commun 2017;8:2098.10.1038/s41467-017-02189-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Ren M, Liu S, Wang B, Chen B, Li J, Li Z. Giant enhancement of second harmonic generation by engineering double plasmonic resonances at nanoscale. Opt Exp 2014;22:28653.10.1364/OE.22.028653Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Bai S, Sun C, Yan H, et al. Healable, transparent, Room-Temperature electronic sensors based on carbon nanotube Network-Coated polyelectrolyte multilayers. Small 2015;11:5807–13.10.1002/smll.201502169Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Liu SY, Huang L, Li JF, et al. Simultaneous excitation and emission enhancement of fluorescence assisted by double plasmon modes of gold nanorods. J Phys Chem C 2013;117:10636–42.10.1021/jp4001626Search in Google Scholar

[12] Wan P, Wen X, Sun C, et al. Flexible transparent films based on nanocomposite networks of polyaniline and carbon nanotubes for High-Performance gas sensing. Small 2015;11:5409–15.10.1002/smll.201501772Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Wang T, Guo Y, Wan P, Zhang H, Chen X, Sun X. Flexible transparent electronic gas sensors. Small 2016;12:3748–56.10.1002/smll.201601049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Zhang Z, Liu Y, Ren L, et al. Three-dimensional-networked Ni-Co-Se nanosheet/nanowire arrays on carbon cloth: a flexible electrode for efficient hydrogen evolution. Electrochim Acta 2016;200:142–51.10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.186Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wang R, Li X, Wang Z, Zhang H. Electrochemical analysis graphite/electrolyte interface in lithium-ion batteries: p-Toluenesulfonyl isocyanate as electrolyte additive. Nano Energy 2017;34:131–40.10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.02.037Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lv TT, Li Y, Ma H, et al. Hybrid metamaterial switching for manipulating chirality based on VO2 phase transition. Sci Rep 2016;6:23186.10.1038/srep23186Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Zhang X, Cao Q, Wang Z, et al. Temperature-dependent photoluminescence and lasing properties of CsPbBr3 nanowires. Nat Photonics 2019;13:21–4.10.1038/s41566-018-0297-ySearch in Google Scholar

[18] Fang M, Shen N, Sha W, Huang Z, Koschny T, Soukoulis CM. Nonlinearity in the dark: broadband terahertz generation with extremely high efficiency. Phys Rev Lett 2019;122:027401.10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.027401Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Zhao J, Zhu J, Cao R, et al. Liquefaction of water on the surface of anisotropic two-dimensional atomic layered black phosphorus. Nat Commun 2019;10:1–7.10.1038/s41467-019-11937-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Dhanabalan SC, Ponraj JS, Zhang H, Bao Q. Present perspectives of broadband photodetectors based on nanobelts, nanoribbons, nanosheets and the emerging 2D materials. Nanoscale 2016;8:6410–34.10.1039/C5NR09111JSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Lu SB, Miao LL, Guo ZN, et al. Broadband nonlinear optical response in multi-layer black phosphorus: an emerging infrared and mid-infrared optical material. Opt Exp 2015;23:11183.10.1364/OE.23.011183Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Dhanabalan SC, Ponraj JS, Guo Z, Li S, Bao Q, Zhang H. Emerging trends in phosphorene fabrication towards next generation devices. Adv Sci 2017;4:1600305.10.1002/advs.201600305Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Tang X, Chen H, Ponraj JS, et al. Quantum dots: Fluorination-Enhanced ambient stability and electronic tolerance of black phosphorus quantum dots (Adv. sci. 9/2018). Adv Sci 2018;5:1870055.10.1002/advs.201870055Search in Google Scholar

[24] Guo N, Hu W, Jiang T, et al. High-quality infrared imaging with graphene photodetectors at room temperature. Nanoscale 2016;8:16065–72.10.1039/C6NR04607JSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Du S, Lu W, Ali A, et al. A broadband fluorographene photodetector. Adv Mater 2017;29:1700463.10.1002/adma.201700463Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Long M, Gao A, Wang P, et al. Room temperature high-detectivity mid-infrared photodetectors based on black arsenic phosphorus. Sci Adv 2017;3:e1700589.10.1126/sciadv.1700589Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Li Z, Qiao H, Guo Z, et al. High-performance photo-electrochemical photodetector based on liquid-exfoliated few-layered InSe nanosheets with enhanced stability. Adv Funct Mater 2018;28:1705237.10.1002/adfm.201705237Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ren X, Li Z, Huang Z, et al. Environmentally robust black phosphorus nanosheets in solution: application for self-powered photodetector. Adv Funct Mater 2017;27:1606834.10.1002/adfm.201606834Search in Google Scholar

[29] Li Z. Mesoscopic and microscopic strategies for engineering plasmon‐enhanced raman scattering. Adv Opt Mater 2018;6:1701097.10.1002/adom.201701097Search in Google Scholar

[30] Fei Z, Rodin AS, Andreev GO, et al. Gate-tuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nano-imaging. Nature 2012;487:82–5.10.1038/nature11253Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Chen X, Wang Y, Xiang Y, et al. A broadband optical modulator based on a graphene hybrid plasmonic waveguide. J Lightwave Technol 2016;34:4948–53.10.1109/JLT.2016.2612400Search in Google Scholar

[32] Lu L, Tang X, Cao R, et al. Broadband nonlinear optical response in few-layer antimonene and antimonene quantum dots: a promising optical kerr media with enhanced stability. Adv Opt Mater 2017;5:1700301.10.1002/adom.201700301Search in Google Scholar

[33] Miao L, Jiang Y, Lu S, et al. Broadband ultrafast nonlinear optical response of few-layers graphene: toward the mid-infrared regime. Photonics Res 2015;3:214.10.1364/PRJ.3.000214Search in Google Scholar

[34] Huang H, Ren X, Li Z, et al. Two-dimensional bismuth nanosheets as prospective photo-detector with tunable optoelectronic performance. Acs Sym Ser 2018;29:235201.10.1088/1361-6528/aab6eeSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Huang Z, Han W, Tang H, et al. Photoelectrochemical-type sunlight photodetector based on MoS 2 /graphene heterostructure. 2D Mater 2015;2:035011.10.1088/2053-1583/2/3/035011Search in Google Scholar

[36] Wang Y, Huang W, Wang C, et al. An all-optical, actively Q-switched fiber laser by an Antimonene-Based optical modulator (Laser photonics rev. 13(4)/2019). Laser Photonics Rev 2019;13:1800313.10.1002/lpor.201800313Search in Google Scholar

[37] Liu X, Cui Y. Revealing the behavior of soliton buildup in a mode-locked laser. Adv Photonics 2019;1:016003.10.1117/1.AP.1.1.016003Search in Google Scholar

[38] Song Y, Chen S, Zhang Q, et al. Vector soliton fiber laser passively mode locked by few layer black phosphorus-based optical saturable absorber. Opt Exp 2019;24:25933–42.10.1364/OE.24.025933Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Zhou Y, Zhang M, Guo Z, et al. Recent advances in black phosphorus-based photonics, electronics, sensors and energy devices. Mater Horiz 2017;4:997–1019.10.1039/C7MH00543ASearch in Google Scholar

[40] Zhang H, Bao Q, Sun Z. Introduction to two-dimensional layered materials for ultrafast lasers. Photonics Res 2018;6:TDL1.10.1364/PRJ.6.00TDL1Search in Google Scholar

[41] Zheng J, Yang Z, Si C, et al. Black phosphorus based All-Optical-Signal-Processing: toward high performances and enhanced stability. Acs Photonics 2017;4:1466–76.10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00231Search in Google Scholar

[42] Zhang Q, Wang L, Wang J, et al. Low-temperature synthesis of edge-rich graphene paper for high-performance aluminum batteries. Energy Storage Mater 2019;15:361–7.10.1016/j.ensm.2018.06.021Search in Google Scholar

[43] Yang Y, Shi Z, Li J, Li Z. Optical forces exerted on a graphene-coated dielectric particle by a focused Gaussian beam. Photon Res 2015;4:65–9.10.1364/PRJ.4.000065Search in Google Scholar

[44] Fu Y, Hu X, Lu C, Yue S, Yang H, Gong Q. All-Optical logic gates based on nanoscale plasmonic slot waveguides. Nano Lett 2012;12:5784–90.10.1021/nl303095sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Yi S, Zhou M, Shi X, Gan Q, Zi J, Yu Z. A multiple-resonator approach for broadband light absorption in a single layer of nanostructured graphene. Opt Exp 2015;23:10081.10.1364/OE.23.010081Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Lu H, Gong Y, Mao D, Gan X, Zhao J. Strong plasmonic confinement and optical force in phosphorene pairs. Opt Exp 2017;25:5255–63.10.1364/OE.25.005255Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Sharma A, Wen B, Liu B, Myint YW, Zhang H, Lu Y. Defect engineering in Few-Layer phosphorene. Small 2018;14:1704556.10.1002/smll.201704556Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Chen Y, Jiang G, Chen S, et al. Mechanically exfoliated black phosphorus as a new saturable absorber for both q-switching and mode-locking laser operation. Opt Exp 2015;23:12823.10.1364/OE.23.012823Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Luo Z, Liu M, Guo Z, et al. Microfiber-based few-layer black phosphorus saturable absorber for ultra-fast fiber laser. Opt Exp 2015;23:20030–9.10.1364/OE.23.020030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Ponraj JS, Xu ZQ, Dhanabalan SC, et al. Photonics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional materials beyond graphene. Nanotechnology 2016;27:462001.10.1088/0957-4484/27/46/462001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Xu Y, Wang W, Ge Y, et al. Stabilization of black phosphorous quantum dots in PMMA nanofiber film and broadband nonlinear optics and ultrafast photonics application. Adv Funct Mater 2017;27:1702437.10.1002/adfm.201702437Search in Google Scholar

[52] Pawliszewska M, Ge Y, Li Z, Zhang H, Sotor J. Fundamental and harmonic mode-locking at 21 μm with black phosphorus saturable absorber. Opt Exp 2017;25:16916–21.10.1364/OE.25.016916Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Tao W, Ji X, Xu X, et al. Antimonene quantum dots: synthesis and application as near-infrared photothermal agents for effective cancer therapy. Angew Chem Int Edit 2017;56:11896–900.10.1002/anie.201703657Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Smirnova DA, Gorbach AV, Iorsh IV, Shadrivov IV, Kivshar YS. Nonlinear switching with a graphene coupler. Phys Rev B 2013;88:045443.10.1103/PhysRevB.88.045443Search in Google Scholar

[55] Guo J. Ruan B, Zhu J, Dai X, Xiang Y, Zhang H. Low-threshold optical bistability in a metasurface with grapheme. J Phys D Appl Phys 2017;50:434003.10.1088/1361-6463/aa8ac6Search in Google Scholar

[56] Zhang F, Jiang X, He Z, Liang W, Xu S, Zhang H. Third-order nonlinear optical responses and carrier dynamics in antimonene. Opt Mater 2019;95:109209.10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109209Search in Google Scholar

[57] Ye T, Wang B, Wang C, et al. Approaching the intrinsic lifetime and modulating a graphene plasmonic resonance at a few hundred GHz. Adv Opt Mater 2019;7:1900315.10.1002/adom.201900315Search in Google Scholar

[58] An YQ, Rowe JE, Dougherty DB, Lee JU, Diebold AC. Optical second-harmonic generation induced by electric current in graphene on Si and SiC substrates. Phys Rev B 2014;89:115310.10.1103/PhysRevB.89.115310Search in Google Scholar

[59] Hu C, Li Z. Vertical microgoblet resonator with high sensitivity fabricated by direct laser writing on a Si substrate. J Appl Phys 2017;121:064502.10.1063/1.4975790Search in Google Scholar

[60] Xu Y, Shi Z, Shi X, Zhang K, Zhang H. Recent progress in black phosphorus and black-phosphorus-analogue materials: properties, synthesis and applications. Nanoscale 2019;11:14491–527.10.1039/C9NR04348ASearch in Google Scholar

[61] Su X, Wang Y, Zhang B, Zhang H, Yang K, Wang R. Bismuth quantum dots as an optical saturable absorber for a 1.3 μm Q-switched solid-state laser. Appl Opt 2019;58:1621–5.10.1364/AO.58.001621Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[62] Jiang X, Liu S, Liang W, et al. Broadband Nonlinear Photonics in Few-Layer MXene Ti3C2Tx (T= F, O, or OH). Laser Photon Rev 2018;12:1700229.10.1002/lpor.201700229Search in Google Scholar

[63] Zhang H, Virally S, Bao Q, et al. Z-scan measurement of the nonlinear refractive index of grapheme. Opt Lett 2012;37: 1856–8.10.1364/OL.37.001856Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[64] Zhang H, Virally S, Bao Q, et al. Z-scan measurement of the refractive index of graphene: erratum. Opt Lett 2013; 38:1566.10.1364/OL.38.001566Search in Google Scholar

[65] Wolf O, Campione S, Benz A, et al. Phased-array sources based on nonlinear metamaterial nanocavities. Nat Commun 2015;6:7667.10.1038/ncomms8667Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[66] Luo L, Chatzakis I, Wang J, et al. Broadband terahertz generation from metamaterials. Nat Commun 2014;5:3055.10.1038/ncomms4055Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Guo Z, Zhang H, Lu S, et al. From black phosphorus to phosphorene: basic solvent exfoliation, evolution of Raman scattering, and applications to ultrafast photonics. Adv Funct Mater 2015;25:6996–7002.10.1002/adfm.201502902Search in Google Scholar

[68] Coleman JN, Lotya M, O’Neill A, et al. Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 2011;331:568–71.10.1126/science.1194975Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[69] Zhang Y, Chang T, Zhou B, et al. Direct observation of the transition from indirect to direct bandgap in atomically thin epitaxial MoSe2. Nat Nanotechnol 2014;9:111–5.10.1038/nnano.2013.277Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[70] Sutter P, Lahiri J, Zahl P, Wang B, Sutter E. Scalable Synthesis of uniform few-layer hexagonal boron nitride dielectric films. Nano Lett 2013;13:276–81.10.1021/nl304080ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[71] Samani MM, Lin M, Wang K, et al. Nat Commun 2015;6:7749.10.1038/ncomms8749Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[72] Wang X, Tabakman SM, Dai H. Atomic layer deposition of metal oxides on pristine and functionalized graphene. J Am Chem Soc 2008;130:8152–3.10.1021/ja8023059Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[73] Lu Z, Sun L, Xu G, et al. Universal transfer and stacking of chemical vapor deposition grown two-dimensional atomic layers with water-soluble polymer mediator. ACS Nano 2016;10:5237–42.10.1021/acsnano.6b00961Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[74] Zhao L, Tang D, Wu X, Zhang H. Dissipative soliton generation in Yb-fiber laser with an invisible intracavity bandpass filter. Opt Lett 2010;35:2756–8.10.1364/OL.35.002756Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[75] Chen Y, Zhao C, Chen S, et al. Large energy, wavelength widely tunable, topological insulator Q-switched erbium-doped fiber laser. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2014;20:0900508.10.1109/JSTQE.2013.2295196Search in Google Scholar

[76] Zhang H, Tang D, Zhao L, Tam HY. Induced solitons formed by cross-polarization coupling in a birefringent cavity fiber laser. Opt Lett 2008;33:2317–9.10.1364/OL.33.002317Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[77] Zhao L, Tang D, Zhang H, Wu X, Xiang N. Soliton trapping in fiber lasers. Opt Exp 2008;16:9528–33.10.1364/CLEO_AT.2014.JW2A.26Search in Google Scholar

[78] Zhang H, Tang D, Zhao L, Wu X. Dark pulse emission of a fiber laser. Phys Rev A 2009;80:045803.10.1103/PhysRevA.80.045803Search in Google Scholar

[79] Liu J, Chen Y, Tang P, et al. Generation and evolution of mode-locked noise-like square-wave pulses in a large-anomalous-dispersion Er-doped ring fiber laser. Opt Exp 2015;23:6418–27.10.1364/OE.23.006418Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[80] Yan P, Lin R, Chen H, et al. Topological insulator solution filled in photonic crystal fiber for passive mode-locked fiberlaser. IEEE Photonic Techol Lett 2015;27:264–7.10.1109/LPT.2014.2361915Search in Google Scholar

[81] Chen Y, Wu M, Tang P, et al. The formation of various multi-soliton patterns and noise-like pulse in a fiber laser passively mode-locked by a topological insulator based saturable absorber. Laser Phys Lett 2014;11:055101.10.1088/1612-2011/11/5/055101Search in Google Scholar

[82] Wang B, Yu H, Zhang H, et al. Topological insulator simultaneously Q-switched dual-wavelength Nd:Lu2O3 laser. IEEE Photonics J 2014;6:1501007.10.1109/JPHOT.2014.2320734Search in Google Scholar

[83] Zhao L, Tang D, Zhang H, Cheng T, Tam H, Lu C. Dynamics of gain-guided solitons in an all-normal-dispersion fiber laser. Opt Lett 2007;32:1806–8.10.1364/OL.32.001806Search in Google Scholar

[84] Zhao L, Tang D, Zhang H. Wu X. Polarization rotation locking of vector solitons in a fiber ring laser. Opt Exp 2008;16:10053–8.10.1364/OE.16.010053Search in Google Scholar

[85] Zhang H, Tang D, Zhao L. Wu X. Dual-wavelength domain wall solitons in a fiber ring laser. Opt Exp 2011;19:3525–30.10.1364/OE.19.003525Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[86] Song Y, Zhang H, Tang D. Shen D. Polarization rotation vector solitons in a graphene mode-locked fiber laser. Opt Exp 2012;20:27283–9.10.1364/OE.20.027283Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Zhao L, Tang D, Zhang H, Wu X. Bunch of restless vector solitons in a fiber laser with SESAM. Opt Exp 2009;17:8103–8.10.1364/OE.17.008103Search in Google Scholar

[88] Liu M, Cai Z, Hu S, et al. Dissipative rogue waves induced by long-range chaotic multi-pulse interactions in a fiber laser with a topological insulator-deposited microfiber photonic device. Opt Lett 2015;40:4767–70.10.1364/OL.40.004767Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[89] Liu X, Yao X, Cui Y. Real-time observation of the buildup of soliton molecules. Phys Rev Lett 2018;121:023905.10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.023905Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[90] Mao D, Jiang B, Gan X, et al. Soliton fiber laser mode locked with two types of film-based Bi2Te3 saturable absorbers. Photonics Res 2015;3:A43–6.10.1364/PRJ.3.000A43Search in Google Scholar

[91] Liu M, Zhao N, Liu H, et al. Dual-wavelength harmonically mode-locked fiber laser with topological insulator saturable absorber. IEEE Photonic Technol Lett 2014;26:983–6.10.1109/LPT.2014.2311101Search in Google Scholar

[92] Huang Z, Zhang Z, Qi X, et al. Wall-like hierarchical metal oxide nanosheet arrays grown on carbon cloth for excellent supercapacitor electrodes. Nanoscale 2016;8:13273–9.10.1039/C6NR04020ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[93] Wang Q, Chen Y, Miao L, et al. Wide spectral and wavelength-tunable dissipative soliton fiber laser with topological insulator nano-sheets self-assembly films sandwiched by PMMA polymer. Opt Exp 2015;23:7681–93.10.1364/OE.23.007681Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[94] Zhang H, Tang D, Zhao L, Bao Q. Vector dissipative solitons in graphene mode locked fiber lasers. Opt Commun 2010;283:3334–8.10.1016/j.optcom.2010.04.064Search in Google Scholar

[95] Mu H, Wang Z, Yuan J, et al. Graphene–Bi2Te3 heterostructure as saturable absorber for short pulse generation. ACS Photonics 2015;2:832–41.10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00193Search in Google Scholar

[96] Li J, Luo H, Zhai B, et al. Black phosphorus: a two-dimension saturable absorption material for mid-infrared Q-switched and mode-locked fiber lasers. Sci Rep 2016;6:30361.10.1038/srep30361Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[97] Kong L, Qin Z, Xie G, et al. Black phosphorus as broadband saturable absorber for pulsed lasers from 1 μm to 2.7 μm wavelength. Laser Phys Lett 2016;13:045801.10.1088/1612-2011/13/4/045801Search in Google Scholar

[98] Wang Z, Chen Y, Zhao C, Zhang H, Wen S. Switchable dual-wavelength synchronously Q-switched erbium-doped fiber laser based on graphene saturable absorber. IEEE Photonics J 2012;41:869–76.10.1109/JPHOT.2012.2199102Search in Google Scholar

[99] Ma J, Lu S, Guo Z, et al. Few-layer black phosphorus based saturable absorber mirror for pulsed solid-state lasers. Opt Exp 2015;23:22643–8.10.1364/OE.23.022643Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[100] Jiang Y, Miao L, Jiang G, et al. Broadband and enhanced nonlinear optical response of MoS2/graphene nanocomposites for ultrafast photonics applications. Sci Rep 2015;5:16372.10.1038/srep16372Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[101] Jiang X, Liu S, Liang W, et al. Broadband Nonlinear Photonics in Few-Layer MXene Ti3C2Tx (T= F, O, or OH) (Laser Photonics Rev. 12 (2)/2018). Laser Photonics Rev 2018;12:1870013.10.1002/lpor.201870013Search in Google Scholar

[102] Li H, Wang L, Zhang H, et al. Graphene-based mid-infrared, tunable, electrically controlled plasmonic filter. Appl Phys Exp 2014;7:02430.10.7567/APEX.7.024301Search in Google Scholar

[103] You WJ, Bongu RS, Bao Q, Panoiu CN. Nonlinear optical properties and applications of 2D materials: theoretical and experimental aspects. Nanophotonics 2019;8:63–97.10.1515/nanoph-2018-0106Search in Google Scholar

[104] Wang B, Zhong S, Zhang Z, Zheng Z, Zhang Y, Zhang H. Broadband photodetectors based on 2D group IVA metal chalcogenides semiconductors. Appl Mater Today 2019;15:115–38.10.1016/j.apmt.2018.12.010Search in Google Scholar

[105] Qiu M, Singh A, Wang D, et al. Biocompatible and biodegradable inorganic nanostructures for nanomedicine: silicon and black phosphorus. Nano Today 2019;25:135–55.10.1016/j.nantod.2019.02.012Search in Google Scholar

[106] Chen Y, Tan C, Zhang H, Wang L. Two-dimensional graphene analogues for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 2015;44:2681–701.10.1039/C4CS00300DSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[107] Ren X, Zhou J, Qi X, et al. Few-layer black phosphorus nanosheets as electrocatalysts for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Adv Energy Mater 2017;7:1700396.10.1002/aenm.201700396Search in Google Scholar

[108] Tao W, Zhu X, Yu X, et al. Black phosphorus nanosheets as a robust delivery platform for cancer theranostics. Adv Mater 2017;29:1603276.10.1002/adma.201603276Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[109] Qiu M, Wang D, Liang W, et al. Novel concept of the smart NIR-light-controlled drug release of black phosphorus nanostructure for cancer therapy. Proc Natl Acad USA 2018;115:501–6.10.1073/pnas.1714421115Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[110] Leong E, Suess RJ, Sushkov AB, Drew HD, Murphy TE, Mittendorff M. Terahertz photoresponse of black phosphorus. Opt Exp 2017;25:12666–74.10.1364/OE.25.012666Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[111] Meng N, Zhang Y, Li K, et al. Hybrid graphene/gold plasmonic fiber-optic biosensor. Adv Mater Technol 2017;2:1600185.10.1002/admt.201600185Search in Google Scholar

[112] Tymchenko M, Nikitin AY, Moreno LM. Faraday rotation due to excitation of magnetoplasmons in graphene microribbons. ACS Nano 2013;7:9780–7.10.1021/nn403282xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[113] Chen B, Zhang C, Hu C, Liu R, Li Z. High-efficiency broadband high-harmonic generation from a single quasi-phase-matching nonlinear crystal. Phys Rev Lett 2015;115:083902.10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.083902Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[114] Nong J, Wei W, Wang W, et al. Strong coherent coupling between graphene surface plasmons and anisotropic black phosphorus localized surface plasmons. Opt Exp 2018;26:1633–44.10.1364/OE.26.001633Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[115] Lu H, Zeng C, Zhang Q, Liu X, Hossain M, Gu M. Graphene-based active slow surface plasmon polaritons. Sci Rep 2015;5:8443.10.1038/srep08443Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[116] Zhou R, Yang S, Liu D, Cao G. Confined surface plasmon of fundamental wave and second harmonic waves in graphene nanoribbon arrays. Opt Exp 2017;25:31478–91.10.1364/OE.25.031478Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[117] Li Y, Chernikov A, Zhang X, et al. Measurement of the optical dielectric function of monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides: MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2. Phys Rev B 2014;90:205422.10.1007/978-3-319-25376-3_5Search in Google Scholar

[118] Mak KF, Sfeir MY, Wu Y, Lui C, Misewich JA, Heinz TF. Measurement of the optical conductivity of grapheme. Phys Rev Lett 2008;101:196405.10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.196405Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[119] Zhou R, Peng J, Yang S, Liu D, Xiao Y, Cao G. Lifetime and nonlinearity of modulated surface plasmon for black phosphorus sensing application. Nanoscale 2018;10:18878–91.10.1039/C8NR06796ASearch in Google Scholar

[120] Ni X, Wang L, Zhu J, Chen X, Lu W. Surface plasmons in a nanostructured black phosphorus flake. Opt Lett 2017;42:2659–62.10.1364/OL.42.002659Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[121] Panoiu N, Sha W, Lei D, Li G. Nonlinear optics in plasmonic nanostructures. J Opt 2018;20:083001.10.1088/2040-8986/aac8edSearch in Google Scholar

[122] Hong L, Chen B, Hu C, Li Z. Analytical solution of second-harmonic generation in a lithium-niobate-birefringence thin-film waveguide via modal phase matching. Phys Rev A 2018;98:023820.10.1103/PhysRevA.98.023820Search in Google Scholar

[123] Cheng J, Vermeulen N, Sipe JE. Third order optical nonlinearity of grapheme. New J Phys 2014;16:053014.10.1088/1367-2630/16/5/053014Search in Google Scholar

[124] Dai X, Jiang L, Xiang Y. Tunable optical bistability of dielectric/nonlinear graphene/dielectric heterostructures. Opt Exp 2015;23:6497–508.10.1364/OE.23.006497Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[125] Li J, Tao J, Chen Z, Huang X. All-optical controlling based on nonlinear graphene plasmonic waveguides. Opt Exp 2016;24:22169–76.10.1364/OE.24.022169Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[126] Peres NMR, Bludov YuV, Santos JE, Jauho AP, Vasilevskiy MI. Optical bistability of graphene in the terahertz range. Phys Rev B 2014;90:125425.10.1103/PhysRevB.90.125425Search in Google Scholar

[127] Ahn KJ, Rotermund F. Terahertz optical bistability of graphene in thin layers of dielectrics. Opt Exp 2017;25:8484–90.10.1364/OE.25.008484Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[128] Youngblood N, Peng R, Nemilentsau A, Low T, Li M. Layer-tunable third-harmonic generation in multilayer black phosphorus. ACS Photonics 2017;4:8–14.10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00639Search in Google Scholar

[129] Cao G, Li H, Zhan S, et al. Uniform theoretical description of plasmon-induced transparency in plasmonic stub waveguide. Opt Lett 2014;39:216–9.10.1364/OL.39.000216Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[130] Deng Y, Cao G, Yang H, Li G, Chen X, Lu W. Tunable and high-sensitivity sensing based on Fano resonance with coupled plasmonic cavities. Sci Rep 2017;7:10639.10.1038/s41598-017-10626-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[131] Rodriguez A, Soljacic M, Joannopoulos JD, Johnson SG. χ(2) and χ(3) harmonic generation at a critical power in inhomogeneous doubly resonant cavities. Opt Exp 2007;15:7303–18.10.1364/OE.15.007303Search in Google Scholar

[132] Zhu L, Liu F, Lin H, et al. Angle-selective perfect absorption with two-dimensional materials. Light Sci Appl 2016;5:e16052.10.1038/lsa.2016.52Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[133] Jadidi MM, König-Otto JC, Winnerl S, et al. Nonlinear terahertz absorption of graphene plasmons. Nano Lett 2016;16:2734–8.10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00405Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[134] Xiang Y, Dai X, Guo J, Wen S, Tang D. Tunable optical bistability at the graphene-covered nonlinear interface. Appl Phys Lett 2014;104:051108.10.1063/1.4863927Search in Google Scholar

[135] Jiang L, Guo J, Wu L, Dai X, Xiang Y. Manipulating the optical bistability at terahertz frequency in the Fabry-Perot cavity with grapheme. Opt Exp 2015;23:31181–91.10.1364/OE.23.031181Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[136] Gan X, Mak KF, Gao Y, et al. Strong enhancement of light-matter interaction in graphene coupled to a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nano Lett 2012;12:5626–31.10.1021/nl302746nSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[137] Lobet M, Sarrazin M, Cecchet F, et al. Probing graphene χ(2) using a gold photon sieve. Nano Lett 2016;16:48–54.10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02494Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[138] Wu L, Huang W, Wang Y, et al. 2D tellurium based high-performance all-optical nonlinear photonic devices. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1806346.10.1002/adfm.201806346Search in Google Scholar

[139] Wang Y, Zhang F, Tang X, et al. A bismuthene-based multifunctional all-optical phase and intensity modulator enabled by photothermal effect. Laser Photonics Rev 2018;12:1800016.10.1039/C8TC05513KSearch in Google Scholar

[140] Shi Z, Gan L, Xiao T, Guo H, Li Z. All-optical modulation of a graphene-cladded silicon photonic crystal cavity. ACS Photonics 2015;2:1513–8.10.1021/acsphotonics.5b00469Search in Google Scholar

[141] Xie Z, Zhang F, Liang Z, et al. Revealing of the ultrafast third-order nonlinear optical response and enabled photonic application in two-dimensional tin sulfide. Photonics Res 2019;7:494–502.10.1364/PRJ.7.000494Search in Google Scholar

[142] Wu L, Xie Z, Lu L, et al. Few-layer tin sulfide: a promising black-phosphorus-analogue 2D material with exceptionally large nonlinear optical response, high stability, and applications in all-optical switching and wavelength conversion. Adv Opt Mater 2018;6:1700985.10.1002/adom.201700985Search in Google Scholar

[143] Ge S, Li C, Zhang Z, et al. Dynamical evolution of anisotropic response in black phosphorus under ultrafast photoexcitation. Nano Lett 2015;15:4650–6.10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01409Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[144] Autere A, Ryder CR, Säynätjoki A, et al. Rapid and large-area characterization of exfoliated black phosphorus using third-harmonic generation microscopy. J Phys Chem Lett 2017;8:1343–50.10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00140Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[145] Han X, Liu X. Ultracompact fiber laser based on a highly integrated optical device. Photon Res 2019;7:36–41.10.1364/PRJ.7.000036Search in Google Scholar

[146] Zhang F, Chen K, Jiang X, et al. Nonlinear optical absorption and ultrafast carrier dynamics of copper antimony sulfide semiconductor nanocrystals. J Mater Chem C 2019;6:8977–83.10.1039/C8TC01606BSearch in Google Scholar

[147] Jiang X, Zeng Z, Li S, et al. Tunable broadband nonlinear optical properties of black phosphorus quantum dots for femtosecond laser pulses. Materials 2017;10:210.10.3390/ma10020210Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[148] Liu X, Pang M. Revealing the buildup dynamics of harmonic mode-locking states in ultrafast lasers. Laser Photon Rev 2019;13:1800333.10.1002/lpor.201800333Search in Google Scholar

[149] Ooi KJA, Chu HS, Bai P, Ang LK. Electro-optical graphene plasmonic logic gates. Opt Lett 2014;39:1629–32.10.1364/OL.39.001629Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[150] Kim JS, Jeon PJ, Lee J, et al. Dual gate black phosphorus field effect transistors on glass for NOR logic and organic light emitting diode switching. Nano Lett 2015;15:5778–83.10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01746Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[151] Kim YD, Kim H, Cho Y, et al. Bright visible light emission from graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 2015;10:676–81.10.1038/nnano.2015.118Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[152] Wu X, Tian J, Yang R. A type of all-optical logic gate based on graphene surface plasmon polaritons. Opt Commun 2017;403:185–92.10.1016/j.optcom.2017.07.041Search in Google Scholar

[153] Gan X, Gao Y, Mak KF, et al. Increasing optical absorption in one-dimensional photonic crystals including MoS2 monolayer for photovoltaics applications. Appl Phys Lett 2013;103:181119.10.1063/1.4826679Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[154] Fang Z, Wang Y, Liu Z, et al. Plasmon-induced doping of graphene. ACS Nano 2012;6:10222–8.10.1021/nn304028bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[155] Fang Z, Liu Z, Wang Y, Ajayan PM, Nordlander P, Halas NJ. Graphene-antenna sandwich photodetector. Nano Lett 2012;12:3808–13.10.1021/nl301774eSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[156] Du B, Lin L, Liu W, et al. Plasmonic hot electron tunneling photodetection in vertical Au–graphene hybrid nanostructures. Laser Photonics Rev 2017;11:1600148.10.1002/lpor.201600148Search in Google Scholar

[157] Liu Q, Zhang B, Qi S, et al. Integration of helicity-control and pulse-modulation for vortex laser based on a black phosphorus plate. Opt Exp 2016;24:30031–7.10.1364/OE.24.030031Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[158] Xu Y, Wang Z, Guo Z, et al. Solvothermal synthesis and ultrafast photonics of black phosphorus quantum dots. Adv Opt Mater 2016;4:1223–9.10.1002/adom.201600214Search in Google Scholar

[159] Lu S, Ge Y, Sun Z, et al. Ultrafast nonlinear absorption and nonlinear refraction in few-layer oxidized black phosphorus. Photon Res 2016;4:286–92.10.1364/PRJ.4.000286Search in Google Scholar

[160] Du J, Zhang M, Guo Z, et al. Phosphorene quantum dot saturable absorbers for ultrafast fiber lasers. Sci Rep 2017;7:42357.10.1038/srep42357Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[161] Tan Y, Guo Z, Ma L, et al. Q-switched waveguide laser based on two-dimensional semiconducting materials: tungsten disulfide and black phosphorous. Opt Exp 2016;24:2858–66.10.1364/OE.24.002858Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[162] Xie Z, Wang D, Fan T, et al. Black phosphorus analogue tin sulfide nanosheets: synthesis and application as near-infrared photothermal agents and drug delivery platforms for cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B 2018;6:4747–55.10.1039/C8TB00729BSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[163] Liang X, Ye X, Wang C, et al. Photothermal cancer immunotherapy by erythrocyte membrane-coated black phosphorus formulation. J Control Release 2019;296:150–61.10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.01.027Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[164] Xing C, Jing G, Liang X, et al. Graphene oxide/black phosphorus nanoflake aerogels with robust thermo-stability and significantly enhanced photothermal properties in air. Nanoscale 2017;9:8096.10.1039/C7NR00663BSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[165] Sun Z, Zhao Y, Li Z, et al. TiL4-coordinated black phosphorus quantum dots as an efficient contrast agent for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of cancer. Small 2017;13:1602896.10.1002/smll.201602896Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[166] Wu L, Dong Y, Zhao J, et al. Kerr nonlinearity in 2D graphdiyne for passive photonic diodes. Adv Mater 2019;31:1807981.10.1002/adma.201807981Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[167] Zhu C, Wang F, Meng Y, et al. A robust and tuneable mid-infrared optical switch enabled by bulk Dirac fermions. Nat Commun 2017;8:14111.10.1038/ncomms14111Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[168] Zhang H, Wang J, Hasan T, Bao Q. Photonics of 2D materials. Opt Commun 2018;406:1–2.10.1016/j.optcom.2017.10.011Search in Google Scholar

[169] Zhang H, Zeng H, Bao Q. Editorial for special issue on photonics based on two-dimensional noncarbon materials. Chin Opt Lett 2018;16:020001.10.3788/COL201816.020001Search in Google Scholar

[170] Tang S, He Z, Liang G, et al. Pulse duration dependent nonlinear optical response in black phosphorus dispersions. Opt Commun 2018;406:244–8.10.1016/j.optcom.2016.11.036Search in Google Scholar

[171] Liu S, Li Z, Ge Y, et al. Graphene/phosphorene nano-heterojunction: facile synthesis, nonlinear optics, and ultrafast photonics applications with enhanced performance. Photon Res 2017;5:662–8.10.1364/PRJ.5.000662Search in Google Scholar

[172] Guo J, Zhao J, Huang D, et al. Two-dimensional tellurium–polymer membrane for ultrafast photonics. Nanoscale 2019;11:6235–42.10.1039/C9NR00736ASearch in Google Scholar

[173] Zhang M, Wu Q, Zhang F, et al. 2D black phosphorus saturable absorbers for ultrafast photonics. Adv Opt Mater 2019;7:1800224.10.1002/adom.201800224Search in Google Scholar

[174] Xing C, Xie Z, Liang Z, et al. 2D Nonlayered selenium nanosheets: facile synthesis, photoluminescence, and ultrafast photonics. Adv Opt Mater 2017;5:1700884.10.1002/adom.201700884Search in Google Scholar

[175] Zhao R, Zhu Z, Dong G, et al. High-efficiency Huygens’ metasurface for terahertz wave manipulation. Opt Lett 2019;44:3482–5.10.1364/OL.44.003482Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[176] Fang Z, Thongrattanasiri S, Schlather A, et al. Gated tunability and hybridization of localized plasmons in nanostructured graphene. ACS Nano 2013;7:2388–95.10.1021/nn3055835Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[177] Fang Z, Wang Y, Schlather A, et al. Active tunable absorption enhancement with graphene nanodisk arrays. Nano Lett 2014;14:299–304.10.1021/nl404042hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[178] Chen K, Wang Y, Liu J, et al. In situ preparation of a CsPbBr3/black phosphorus heterostructure with an optimized interface and photodetector application. Nanoscale 2019;11:16852–9.10.1039/C9NR06488ESearch in Google Scholar

[179] Jiang X, Lu H, Li Q, Zhou H, Zhang S, Zhang H. Epsilon-near-zero medium for optical switches in a monolithic waveguide chip at 1.9 μm. Nanophotonics 2018;7:1835–43.10.1515/nanoph-2018-0102Search in Google Scholar

[180] Zhou J, Li Z, Ying M, et al. Black phosphorus nanosheets for rapid microRNA detection. Nanoscale 2018;10:5060–4.10.1039/C7NR08900GSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[181] Liu Y, Shivananju BN, Wang Y, et al. Highly efficient and air-stable infrared photodetector based on 2D layered graphene–black phosphorus heterostructure. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2017;9:36137–45.10.1021/acsami.7b09889Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[182] Zhang Y, Lim C, Dai Z, et al. Photonics and optoelectronics using nano-structured hybrid perovskite media and their optical cavities. Phys Rep 2019;795:1–51.10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.005Search in Google Scholar

[183] Guo S, Zhang Y, Ge Y, Zhang S, Zeng H, Zhang H. 2D V-V binary materials: status and challenges. Adv Mater 2019;31:1902352.10.1002/adma.201902352Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[184] Du B, Yang W, Jiang Q, et al. Plasmonic-functionalized broadband perovskite photodetector. Adv Opt Mater 2018;6:1701271.10.1002/adom.201701271Search in Google Scholar

[185] Zhang Y, Liu J, Wang Z, et al. Synthesis, properties, and optical applications of low-dimensional perovskites. Chem Commun 2016;52:13637–55.10.1039/C6CC06425FSearch in Google Scholar

[186] Xie Z, Xing C, Huang W, et al. Ultrathin 2D nonlayered tellurium nanosheets: facile liquid-phase exfoliation, characterization, and photoresponse with high performance and enhanced stability. Adv Funct Mater 2018;28:1705833.10.1002/adfm.201705833Search in Google Scholar

[187] Huang W, Xie Z, Fan T, et al. Black-phosphorus-analogue tin monosulfide: an emerging optoelectronic two-dimensional material for high-performance photodetection with improved stability under ambient/harsh conditions. J Mater Chem C 2018;6:9582–93.10.1039/C8TC03284JSearch in Google Scholar

[188] Fan T, Xie Z, Zhang W, Li Z, Zhang H. Two-dimensional non-layered selenium nanoflakes: facile fabrications and applications for self-powered photo-detector. Nanotechnology 2019;30:114002.10.1088/1361-6528/aafc0fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[189] Xing C, Huang W, Xie Z, et al. Ultrasmall bismuth quantum dots: facile liquid-phase exfoliation, characterization, and application in high-performance UV–Vis photodetector. ACS Photonics 2017;5:621–9.10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01211Search in Google Scholar

[190] Li C, Liu J, Guo Z, et al. Black phosphorus saturable absorber for a diode-pumped passively Q-switched Er:CaF2 mid-infrared laser. Opt Commun 2018;406:158–62.10.1016/j.optcom.2017.05.052Search in Google Scholar

[191] Li Z, Xu H, Shao J, et al. Polydopamine-functionalized black phosphorus quantum dots for cancer theranostics. Appl Mater Today 2019;15:297–304.10.1016/j.apmt.2019.02.002Search in Google Scholar

[192] Ji X, Kong N, Wang J, et al. A novel top-down synthesis of ultrathin 2D boron nanosheets for multimodal imaging-guided cancer therapy. Adv Mater 2018;30:1803031.10.1002/adma.201803031Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[193] Xing C, Chen S, Qiu M, et al. Conceptually novel black phosphorus/cellulose hydrogels as promising photothermal agents for effective cancer therapy. Adv Healthc Mater 2018;7:1701510.10.1002/adhm.201701510Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[194] Cao R, Wang H, Guo Z, et al. Black phosphorous/indium selenide photoconductive detector for visible and near-infrared light with high sensitivity. Adv Opt Mater 2019;23:1900020.10.1002/adom.201900020Search in Google Scholar

[195] Qiu M, Ren W, Jeong T, et al. Omnipotent phosphorene: a next-generation, two-dimensional nanoplatform for multidisciplinary biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 2018;47:5588–601.10.1039/C8CS00342DSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[196] Xie Z, Chen S, Duo Y, et al. Biocompatible two-dimensional titanium nanosheets for multimodal imaging-guided cancer theranostics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:22129–40.10.1021/acsami.9b04628Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[197] Luo M, Fan T, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Mei L. 2D black phosphorus– based biomedical applications. Adv Fun Mater 2019;29: 1808306.10.1002/adfm.201808306Search in Google Scholar

[198] Shi J, Li Z, Sang DK, et al. THz photonics in two dimensional materials and metamaterials: properties, devices and prospects. J Mater Chem C 2018;6:1291–306.10.1039/C7TC05460BSearch in Google Scholar

[199] Xie Z, Peng Y, Yu L, Xing C, Qiu M, Hu J, Zhang H. Solar-inspired water purification based on emerging 2D materials: status and challenges. Solar RRL 2020;29:1900400.10.1002/solr.201900400Search in Google Scholar

[200] Guo Z, Chen S, Wang Z, et al. Metal-ion-modified black phosphorus with enhanced stability and transistor performance. Adv Mater 2017;29:1703811.10.1002/adma.201703811Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[201] Lu L, Wang W, Wu L, et al. All-optical switching of two continuous waves in few layer bismuthene based on spatial cross-phase modulation. ACS Photonics 2017;4:2852–61.10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00849Search in Google Scholar

[202] Zheng J, Tang X, Yang Z, et al. Few-layer phosphorene-decorated microfiber for all-optical thresholding and optical modulation. Adv Opt Mater 2017;5:1700026.10.1002/adom.201700026Search in Google Scholar

[203] Long M, Liu E, Wang P, et al. Broadband photovoltaic detectors based on an atomically thin heterostructure. Nano Lett 2016;16:2254–9.10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04538Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[204] Liu X, Popa D, Akhmediev N. Revealing the transition dynamics from Q switching to mode locking in a soliton laser. Phys Rev Lett 2019;123:093901.10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.093901Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[205] Wu L, Jiang X, Zhao J, et al. MXene-based nonlinear optical information converter for all-optical modulator and switcher. Laser Photonics Rev 2018;12:1800215.10.1002/lpor.201800215Search in Google Scholar

[206] Liu X, Yang K, Zhao S, et al. High-power passively Q-switched 2 μm all-solid-state laser based on a Bi2Te3 saturable absorber. Photon Res 2017;5:461–6.10.1364/PRJ.5.000461Search in Google Scholar

[207] Chen Y, Jiang X, Liang W, et al. Nonlinear few-layer antimonene-based all-optical signal processing: ultrafast optical switching and high-speed wavelength conversion. Adv Opt Mater 2018;6:1701287.10.1002/adom.201701287Search in Google Scholar

[208] Zhang F, Xu N, Zhao J, et al. Quantum confinement-induced enhanced nonlinearity and carrier lifetime modulation in two-dimensional tin sulfide. Nanophotonics 2020. doi:10.1515/nanoph-2019-0448.Search in Google Scholar

[209] Liu J, Jiang X, Zhang R, et al. MXene-enabled electrochemical microfluidic biosensor: applications toward multicomponent continuous monitoring in whole blood. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1807326.10.1002/adfm.201807326Search in Google Scholar

[210] Xue T, Liang W, Li Y, et al. Ultrasensitive detection of miRNA with an antimonene-based surface plasmon resonance sensor. Nat Commun 2019;10:28.10.1038/s41467-018-07947-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[211] Wang T, Qi D, Yang H, et al. Tactile chemomechanical transduction based on an elastic microstructured array to enhance the sensitivity of portable biosensors. Adv Mater 2019;31:1803883.10.1002/adma.201803883Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[212] Kasani S, Curtin K, Wu N. A review of 2D and 3D plasmonic nanostructure array patterns: fabrication, light management and sensing applications. Nanophotonics 2019;8:2065–89.10.1515/nanoph-2019-0158Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-01-03
Revised: 2020-02-14
Accepted: 2020-02-15
Published Online: 2020-03-18

© 2020 Renlong Zhou, Kaleem Ullah, Sa Yang et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. 2D Xenes: from fundamentals to applications
  3. Reviews
  4. Monolayer MoS2 for nanoscale photonics
  5. 2D photonic memristor beyond graphene: progress and prospects
  6. MXenes: focus on optical and electronic properties and corresponding applications
  7. Advances in photonics of recently developed Xenes
  8. Nonlinear optical properties of anisotropic two-dimensional layered materials for ultrafast photonics
  9. Tunable electronic structure of two-dimensional transition metal chalcogenides for optoelectronic applications
  10. Recent advances in graphene and black phosphorus nonlinear plasmonics
  11. Fabrication, optical properties, and applications of twisted two-dimensional materials
  12. Novel layered 2D materials for ultrafast photonics
  13. 2D organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite materials for nonlinear optics
  14. Fine structures of valley-polarized excitonic states in monolayer transitional metal dichalcogenides
  15. MXenes for future nanophotonic device applications
  16. Two-dimensional nanomaterials for Förster resonance energy transfer–based sensing applications
  17. 2D materials integrated with metallic nanostructures: fundamentals and optoelectronic applications
  18. Graphene plasmonic devices for terahertz optoelectronics
  19. Research Articles
  20. Real-time dynamics of soliton collision in a bound-state soliton fiber laser
  21. Ultra-strong anisotropic photo-responsivity of bilayer tellurene: a quantum transport and time-domain first principle study
  22. Topological insulator overlayer to enhance the sensitivity and detection limit of surface plasmon resonance sensor
  23. Magnons scattering induced photonic chaos in the optomagnonic resonators
  24. Quantum confinement-induced enhanced nonlinearity and carrier lifetime modulation in two-dimensional tin sulfide
  25. Phosphorene-assisted silicon photonic modulator with fast response time
  26. High-performance monolayer MoS2 photodetector enabled by oxide stress liner using scalable chemical vapor growth method
  27. Enhancing the generating and collecting efficiency of single particle upconverting luminescence at low power excitation
  28. Biexcitons in 2D (iso-BA)2PbI4 perovskite crystals
  29. Broadband nonlinear optical response in GeSe nanoplates and its applications in all-optical diode
  30. Plasmonic nanocavity enhanced vibration of graphene by a radially polarized optical field
  31. Facile synthesis of sulfur@titanium carbide Mxene as high performance cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries
  32. The pump fluence and wavelength-dependent ultrafast carrier dynamics and optical nonlinear absorption in black phosphorus nanosheets
  33. Indium selenide film: a promising saturable absorber in 3- to 4-μm band for mid-infrared pulsed laser
  34. Temperature-stable black phosphorus field-effect transistors through effective phonon scattering suppression on atomic layer deposited aluminum nitride
  35. Real-time and noninvasive tracking of injectable hydrogel degradation using functionalized AIE nanoparticles
  36. MXene-Ti3C2 assisted one-step synthesis of carbon-supported TiO2/Bi4NbO8Cl heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic water decontamination
  37. Nanofocusing of acoustic graphene plasmon polaritons for enhancing mid-infrared molecular fingerprints
  38. Effects of gap thickness and emitter location on the photoluminescence enhancement of monolayer MoS2 in a plasmonic nanoparticle-film coupled system
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0004/html
Scroll to top button