Abstract
The Universal Periodic Review (UPR), established in 2006, has been hailed as an innovative mechanism of the United Nations’ Human Rights Council. The peer review mechanism assesses the human rights records of all UN Member States and provides recommendations to further the global promotion and protection of human rights. This article provides an analysis of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s third UPR in 2018 with a specific focus on the State’s use of capital punishment. It explores the challenges faced by the UPR and issues recommendations to foster meaningful discourse, in the international community, to protect the right to life and engender change at the domestic level.
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- A UPR Perspective on Capital Punishment and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- “Dignity Embodies Duty”: Islamic Perspective on Combating “Hate Speech”
- Prioritizing Religious Freedoms: Islam, Pakistan, and the Human Rights Discourse
- Moderation between Religious Freedom and Harmony Concerning the Regulation on Mosque Loudspeaker: Comparison between Indonesia and Other Muslim Countries
- An Environmental Human Rights Approach to Environmental Tobacco Smoking
- Book Review
- Noura Erakat: Justice for Some: Law and the Question of Palestine
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- A UPR Perspective on Capital Punishment and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- “Dignity Embodies Duty”: Islamic Perspective on Combating “Hate Speech”
- Prioritizing Religious Freedoms: Islam, Pakistan, and the Human Rights Discourse
- Moderation between Religious Freedom and Harmony Concerning the Regulation on Mosque Loudspeaker: Comparison between Indonesia and Other Muslim Countries
- An Environmental Human Rights Approach to Environmental Tobacco Smoking
- Book Review
- Noura Erakat: Justice for Some: Law and the Question of Palestine