Translating the style of Aganaktismenoi (Indignants) on Facebook

Irene Theodoropoulou

doi:10.1515/multi-2014-1019

Article

Translating the style of Aganaktismenoi (Indignants) on Facebook

Irene Theodoropoulou

Published/Copyright: August 11, 2015

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Multilingua Volume 35 Issue 5

Abstract

The paper discusses translation challenges associated with the linguistic and multisemiotic stylistic ways (Kress 2010; Coupland 2007) Aganaktismenoi, the Greek indignants’ movement, employ to produce a digital sense of their community and subsequent identities. It argues for the transfer of the cultural and sociopolitical element as being the hardest to translate into languages other than Greek. In light of this challenge, it is suggested that a functional variationist translation model (Theodoropoulou 2007), which takes into consideration the general context and the functions of individual illocutionary acts (Austin 1962), i.e. intended meanings, performed digitally could remedy this weakness by yielding translations that do justice to the original utterances. This is also enhanced by the fact that a multisemiotic style, such as a picture posted on Facebook Wall, offers lots of background information (e.g., colors and facial expressions, to mention just a few), which act synergistically in the deciphering and consequent translation of the text. The expansion of the use of the aforementioned sociopragmatic model of translation into multisemiotic texts is made on the basis of linguistic and multimodal analysis of posts with pictures and text from the Aganaktismenoi pages on Facebook and their translation into English.

Keywords: multimodality; Greek indignants; functional variation; translation; style

References

Adams, Michael. 2009. Slang: The People’s Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barton, David & Carmen Lee. 2013. Language online. Investigating digital texts and practices. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203552308Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan (ed.). 1999. Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808049Search in Google Scholar

Bolander, Brook & Miriam A. Locher. 2014. Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues. Discourse, Context & Media. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.10.004i (accessed 01 July 2015)Search in Google Scholar

boyd, danah. 2011. Social network sites as networked publics. Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In: Z. Papacharissi (ed.), A networked self. Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, 39–58. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755064Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2013. Social context, style, and identity in sociolinguistics. In J. Holmes & K. Hazen (eds.), Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical guide. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 290–303.Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2012. Internet linguistics: A student guide. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar

Fabricius, Anne H. 2002. RP as sociolinguistic object. Nordic Journal of English Studies 1(2). 355–372. http://ojs.ub.gu.se/ojs/index.php/njes/article/view/205 (accessed 01 July 2015).10.35360/njes.122Search in Google Scholar

Fabricius, Anne H. 2006. The ‘vivid sociolinguistic profiling’ of Received Pronunciation: Responses to gendered dialect-in-discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10. 111–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00320.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gee, James P. 2011. How to do discourse analysis. A toolkit. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203850992Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611834Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander K. 1985. Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & A. McIntosh & P. Strevens. 1964. The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Hara, Noriko & Bi-Yun Huang. 2011. Online social movements. Annual Review of Infmormation Science and Technology 45(1). 489–522.10.1002/aris.2011.1440450117Search in Google Scholar

Hatim, Basil & Ian Mason. 1990. Discourse and the translator. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan C. 2004. Online communication: Through the lens of discourse. In M. Consalvo, N. Baym, J. Hunsinger, K. B. Jensen, J. Logie, M. Murero, & L. R. Shade (eds.), Internet research annual, Volume 1, 65–76. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.). 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga. 2002. Irony, quotation, and other forms of staged intertextuality. In K. Graumann and W. Kallmeyer (eds.), Perspective and perspectivation in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_x7DQNsxMogJ:https://portal.uni-freiburg.de/sdd/personen/kotthoff/index.html/publikationen/files/irony-quotation-and-other-forms-of-staged-intertextuality.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=gr (accessed 20 June 2014)10.1075/hcp.9.13kotSearch in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther. 2010. multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Marichal, José. 2012. Facebook democracy. The architecture of disclosure and the threat to public life. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Mehrez, S. 2012. Introduction: Translating revolution. An open text. In S. Mehrez (ed.), Translating Egypt’s revolution: The language of Tahrir. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.10.5743/cairo/9789774165337.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Platt, Gerarld M. & Rhys H. Williams. 2002. Ideological language and social movement mobilization: A sociolinguistic analysis of segregationists’ ideologies. Sociological Theory 20(3). 328–359.10.1111/1467-9558.00167Search in Google Scholar

Rumsey, Alan. 1990. Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist 92(2). 346–361.10.1525/aa.1990.92.2.02a00060Search in Google Scholar

Salem, Heba & Kantaro Taira. 2012. Al Thawra-al daHira: The challenges of translating revolutionary humor. In S. Mehrez (ed.), Translating Egypt’s revolution: The language of Tahrir. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Search in Google Scholar

Theodoropoulou, Irene. 2012. Sociolinguistic profile of the Generation of 700 Euros. In G. Frangaki, Thanassis Georgakopoulos & Charalambos Themistocleous (eds.), Current trends in Greek linguistics, 177–196. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Theodoropoulou, Irene. 2014a. Sociolinguistics of style and social class in contemporary Athens. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.57Search in Google Scholar

Theodoropoulou, Irene. 2014b. Facebook talk. An interactional analysis of Aganaktismenoi Facebook Wall discussions. In M. Christodoulidou (Ed.), Analyzing Greek talk-in-interaction, 262–289. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Theodoropoulou, Irene. 2015. Politeness on Facebook: The case of Modern Greek birthday wishes. In: Miriam Locher A., Brook Bolander, and Nicole Höhn (eds.) Special issue: Relational Work in Facebook and Discussion Boards/Fora. Pragmatics 25(1): 23–45.10.1075/prag.25.1.02theSearch in Google Scholar

Woolard, Kathryn A. & Bambi B. Schieffelin. 1994. Language Ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology23(1). 55–82.10.1002/9781118786093.iela0217Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-8-11

Published in Print: 2016-9-1

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-1019

Keywords for this article

multimodality; Greek indignants; functional variation; translation; style