Home ‘You do not have to say anything …’: Instructing the jury on the defendant’s right to silence in the English criminal justice system
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

‘You do not have to say anything …’: Instructing the jury on the defendant’s right to silence in the English criminal justice system

  • Janet Cotterill
Published/Copyright: October 27, 2008
Multilingua
From the journal Volume 24 Issue 1-2

Abstract

The right to silence is both a fundamental and a controversial element of the legal process. Suspects and defendants are reminded repeatedly of this entitlement, from the moment of arrest, where the police caution explains that ‘you do not have to say anything …’, to the right of defendants in criminal trials to decline to testify in their own defence. However, the decision to remain silent is not a risk-free strategy for the suspect/defendant in the English legal system. Unlike in the US, where criminal juries are instructed that they may not draw any inferences from such a decision, recent changes in the UK mean that English juries are now instructed that they may draw ‘appropriate inferences’ from the defendant’s failure to speak. This paper draws on a corpus of oral jury instructions taken from English criminal trials where the defendant chose to invoke the right to silence at interview and/or during the subsequent trial. It analyses the communicative strategies employed by trial judges in explaining this aspect of the law to juries in their final jury instructions, and includes a discussion of some of the implications of this erosion of the right to silence for both suspects and defendants.

Published Online: 2008-10-27
Published in Print: 2005-05-01

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mult.24.1-2.7/html
Scroll to top button