Political Liberalism, Exclusion and Metapluralism: A Critical Analysis of John Tomasi’s Account of the Moral Powers of Citizenship
-
Joshua Clarke
Abstract
Upon reading Free Market Fairness, it is apparent that John Tomasi’s defence of market democracy relies on a certain conception of political personality qua citizenship in which the idea of self-authorship is afforded a primary role. With the goal of both clarifying and assessing the merits of said conception, this article begins with a delimitation of Rawls’s and John Tomasi’s account of political personhood qua citizenship. It then moves on to provide several interpretations of the central causality clause associated with Tomasi’s first moral power, favouring a so-called ontological interpretation. Building upon this, the article goes on to argue that Tomasi’s account brings to light problems of exclusivity and metapluralism which afflict, and cast doubt upon, the broader project of political liberalism.
Acknowledgments
I wish to thank the reviewers as well as all of those within KU Leuven’s philosophy department who provided me with helpful feedback. I am particularly thankful to Eszter Kollar for all her valuable advice.
References
Brennan, J., and J. Tomasi. 2012. “Classical Liberalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy, edited by D. Estlund, 115–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0006Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, J. 2019. “Against the Moral Powers Test of Basic Liberty.” European Journal of Philosophy 28 (2): 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12497.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, J. 1993. “Moral Pluralism and Political Consensus.” In The Idea of Democracy, edited by D. Copp, F. Hampton, and J. E. Roemer, 270–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Constant, B. (1819) 1988. “The Liberty of Ancients Compared with that of Moderns.” In Constant: Political Writings, edited by B. Fontana, 308–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dahl, R. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303.Search in Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. New York: The Macmillan Company.Search in Google Scholar
Flanigan, J. 2018. “All Liberty is Basic.” Res Publica 24 (4): 455–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9368-z.Search in Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544562 (accessed March 23, 2025).Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989. Theory of Communicative Action Vol 2: The Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1995a. “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Public Reason: Remarks on Rawls’s Political Liberalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 92 (3): 109–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940842.Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1995b. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity Press.10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2017. “Rawls’s Political Liberalism: Reply to the Resumption of a Discussion.” Translated by C. Cronin In Postmetaphysical Thinking II: Essays and Replies, 189–209. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hayek, F. 2007. The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226320533.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hayek, F. 2011. The Constitution of Liberty. New York: Routledge.10.7208/chicago/9780226320519.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1739) 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00046221Search in Google Scholar
James, W. 1948. “The Will to Believe.” In Essays in Pragmaticism, edited by A. Castell, 88–109. New York: Hafner Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1788) 1997. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809576Search in Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1785) 2011. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by M. Gregor, and J. Timmermann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511973741Search in Google Scholar
Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View, 2nd ed. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9Search in Google Scholar
Murry, C. 2006. In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Nozick, F. 2013. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Penny, R. 2015. “Self-Respect or Self-Delusion? Tomasi and Rawls on the Basic Liberties.” Res Publica 21 (4): 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9300-3.Search in Google Scholar
Quong, J. 2022. “Public Reason.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192843005.003.0010. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/public-reason/ (accessed March 29, 2025).Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674042605Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Colombia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. “Justice as Fairness: Political Not Metaphysical.” In Collected Papers: John Rawls, edited by S. Freeman, 388–414. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0Search in Google Scholar
Sandel, M. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1963. Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
Steven, D. 2015. “Introduction.” Res Publica 21 (4): 343–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9304-z.Search in Google Scholar
Strawson, P. 2013. “Freedom and Resentment.” In Ethical Theory: An Anthology. 2nd., edited by R. Shafer-Landau, 340–52. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Tomasi, J. 2001. Liberalism Beyond Justice: Citizens, Society, and the Boundaries of Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400824212Search in Google Scholar
Tomasi, J. 2011. “Democratic Legitimacy and Economic Liberty.” Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1): 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052511000124.Search in Google Scholar
Tomasi, J. 2012. Free Market Fairness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Tomasi, J. 2015. “Market Democracy and Meaningful Work: A Reply to Critics.” Res Publica 21 (4): 443–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-015-9303-0.Search in Google Scholar
Von Platz, J. 2013. “Are Economic Liberties Basic Rights?” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13 (1): 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X13483.Search in Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1905) 2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by T. Parsons. London/New York: Routledge Classics.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
