Home Understanding Dialect and Developing Critical Literacy with English Language Learners
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Understanding Dialect and Developing Critical Literacy with English Language Learners

  • Heather Coffey EMAIL logo , Liv Davila and Lan Kolano
Published/Copyright: June 18, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

English language learners (ELLs) are the fastest growing population in the US schools (National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 2011); these students are consistently outperformed by their White counterparts on the National Assessment of Educational Progress data (NCES, 2011). While traditional English as a second language (ESL) classes emphasize building students’ knowledge of spoken and written aspects of the English language, focusing on vocabulary and grammar instruction, we propose that ESL instruction might also include a focus on more nuanced elements of the language such as dialect and register and the relation between power and language, which is critical literacy. This article defines critical literacy in working with ELLs, explores the potential benefit of understanding language/power relationships, and provides one unit plan that will enable teachers to facilitate this development of knowledge.

References

Alford, J. (2001). Learning language and critical literacy: Adolescent ESL students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(3), 238–242.Search in Google Scholar

Behrman, E. (2006). Teaching about language, power, and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498.10.1598/JAAL.49.6.4Search in Google Scholar

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, policy and practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum.10.4324/9781410601803Search in Google Scholar

Blackledge, A. (2000). Literacy, power and social justice. Staffordshire, England: Trentham Books.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cervetti, G., Pardales, M., & Damico, J. (2001). A tale of differences: Comparing the traditions, perspectives, and educational goals of critical reading and critical literacy. Reading Online. 4(9). Retrieved from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/cervetti/Search in Google Scholar

Comber, B. (2001). Classroom explorations in critical literacy. In H. Fehring & P. Green (Eds.), Critical literacy: A collection of articles from the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association (pp. 90–102). Newark: International Reading Association.Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (2003). BICS and CALP: Origins and rationale for the distinction. In C. B. Paulston & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: The essential readings (pp. 322–328). London: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York, NY: New Press.10.2307/358724Search in Google Scholar

Dunbar, P. (1903). When Malindy sings. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead, and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Dunbar, P. (1913). We wear the mask: The complete poems of Paul Laurence Dunbar. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead, and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. (2004). Making content comprehensible to English language learners: The SIOP model (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. New York, NY: Pearson ESL.Search in Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Gaines, E. (1993). A lesson before dying. New York, NY: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Giroux, H. (2001). Culture, power and transformation in the work of Paulo Freire. In F. Schultz (Ed.), SOURCES: Notable selections in education (3rd ed.) (pp. 77–86). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lankshear, C., & Lawler, M. (1987) Literacy, Schooling, and Revolution. New York: Falmer Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lankshear, C., & McLaren, P. (Eds.). (1993). Critical literacy: Politics, praxis, and the postmodern. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Lohrey, A. (1998). Critical literacy: A professional development resource. Melbourne: Language Australia; the National Language Institute of Australia.Search in Google Scholar

Luke, A. (1997). Critical approaches to literacy. In V. Edwards & D. Corson (Eds.), Literacy (Vol. 2, pp. 143–151). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-011-4540-4_16Search in Google Scholar

Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43(5), 448–461.Search in Google Scholar

Luke, A. (2004). At last: The trouble with English. Research in the Teaching of English, 39, 85–95.10.58680/rte20044463Search in Google Scholar

McLaren, P. (2003). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Boston, MA: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2001). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 21(2), 132–141.10.1080/00405849209543534Search in Google Scholar

Morrell, E. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011). National Assessment of Educational Progress. The nation’s report card: Reading 2011. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2011/2012457.aspSearch in Google Scholar

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI). (2010). Headcount and home languages. Retrieved from http://esllearnnc.sharpschool.com/cms/One.aspx?portalId=4502459&pageId=7605316Search in Google Scholar

Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2004). Critical pedagogy and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524834Search in Google Scholar

Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226147864.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Shor, I. (1999). What is critical literacy? In Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R.D. (Eds) (2003). The Critical Pedagogy Reader (pp. 282–304). London: Routledge Falmer.Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, A. (1996). Critical questions: Whose questions? The Reading Teacher [Online] 50(2), 118–127. Available at: Proquest Database, ISSN: 00340561.Search in Google Scholar

Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.10.52214/cice.v5i2.11369Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Houndsmills: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9780230514447Search in Google Scholar

Wolfram, W. (2003). Language variation in the American south: An introduction. American Speech, 78(2), 123–129.10.1215/00031283-78-2-123Search in Google Scholar

Wolfram, W., & Schilling-Estes, N. (2006). American English Dialects and variation. Madden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-06-18

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mlt-2012-0006/html
Scroll to top button