Home Two new Zn(ii) coordination polymers incorporating 2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline: Synthesis and structure
Article Open Access

Two new Zn(ii) coordination polymers incorporating 2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline: Synthesis and structure

  • Huilin Wang , Xin Wang , Meimiao Li and Jingdong Feng EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 20, 2024

Abstract

Based on phenanthroline derivate ligand and Zn(ii), two novel coordination polymers, namely [Zn(L)(hta)] n (1) and {[Zn2(L)2(dhb)2]·H2O} n (2) (L = 2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline, H2hta = heptanedioic acid, and H2dhb = 3,5-dinitro-2-hydroxybenzoic acid), have been synthesized under the hydrothermal condition. For 1, each hta anion bridges two Zn(ii) atoms in a tridentate mode to shape into a chain structure and through different π–π stacking interactions to form a three-dimensional supramolecular structure. The L ligand of 2 connects two neighbouring Zn(ii) atoms to give a 1D chain, which is further extended into the 2D supramolecular layer.

1 Introduction

As a special kind of coordination solids, coordination polymers (CPs) developed rapidly for the past decades [1,2,3,4]. CPs have been at the forefront of study in materials science due to CPs with complex architectures and with wide applications [5,6,7], such as supercapacitors [8], degradation [9,10], catalysis [11,12], fluorescence [13], and proton conduction [14,15]. It is a crucial step for the self-assembly process of CPs to select suitable organic bridging ligands [16,17,18]. It is generally known that N-donor ligands are excellent ligands for the synthesis of CPs because of their excellent binding abilities [19]. For example, phenanthroline derivate ligands can provide multiple ligand patterns and a large number of ligand sites, resulting in CPs with exciting structures [20,21,22,23]. In addition, metal centres with d0 and d10 structures also confer special properties on CPs. For example, metal (Zn, Cd) ions with d10 configuration are particularly promising due to their applications in luminescence and biological activities [24,25].

Based on this, we used the hydrothermal method to synthesize two new CPs with Zn(ii) and phenanthroline derivate ligand (L = 2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline).

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Structural analysis

CP 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system, P21/c space group with a Zn(ii) atom, an L ligand, and a hta anion. In Figure 1, each Zn(ii) atom is coordinated by three oxygen atoms (O(2), O(3i), O(4i)) from two different hta anions and two nitrogen atoms (N(1) and N(2)) from one L ligand. The atoms N(1), N(2), O(3i), and O(4i) make up the basal plane of the square pyramid, while the top position is occupied by O(2). Each hta anion bridges two Zn(ii) atoms in a tridentate mode to shape into a chain structure with a Zn∙∙∙Zn distance of 10.180 Å (Figure 2). The L ligands are located on two sides of the chain. As shown in Figure 3, there exits two π–π interactions in adjacent chains [Cg6∙∙∙Cg6iv and Cg5∙∙∙Cg8vi, Table 1] and N–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds [N(4)–H(4)∙∙∙O(1), Table 2]. The neighboring chains grow up to a 2D supramolecular layer through π–π interactions [Cg6∙∙∙Cg6iv, centroid-to-centroid distance being 3.656(4) Å, dihedral angle of 0.0(3)°] (Figure 4). Moreover, the 2D supramolecular layers are formed into 3D architecture by another π–π interactions [Cg5∙∙∙Cg8vi, face-to-face distance of ca. 3.462(2) Å, slippage distance of 1.696 Å] (Figure 5).

Figure 1 
                  Coordination environment of the Zn(ii) ion of 1 (symmetry codes: i−x + 2, y + 1/2, −z + 3/2).
Figure 1

Coordination environment of the Zn(ii) ion of 1 (symmetry codes: ix + 2, y + 1/2, −z + 3/2).

Figure 2 
                  View of the 1D chain structure of 1 constructed by hta anion.
Figure 2

View of the 1D chain structure of 1 constructed by hta anion.

Figure 3 
                  View of the π–π interactions and N–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds of 1 between two 1D chains.
Figure 3

View of the π–π interactions and N–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds of 1 between two 1D chains.

Table 1

π–π interactions for (Å, °) 1 and 2

Complex Ring (I)⋯ring (J) Centroid tocentroid distance (Å) α (°) Slippage distance (Å) Symmetry code
1 Cg6⋯Cg6iv 3.656(4) 0.0(3) 1.426 x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1
2 Cg5⋯Cg8vi 3.748(4) 10.4(3) 1.696 x + 1, y − 1/2, −z + 1/2
Cg5⋯Cg5iv 3.670(3) 0.0(2) 1.300 x + 1/2, −y + 1/2, −z
Cg8⋯Cg8ii 3.596(3) 0.6(2) 0.331 x + 1, y, −z + 1/2

Complex 1: Ring codes – Cg5: N(1)/C(1)–C(5), Cg6: N(2)/C(6)–C(10), Cg8: C(14)–C(19).

Complex 2: Ring codes – Cg5: N(2)/C(6)–C(10), Cg8: C(21)–C2(26). α is the dihedral angle between planes I and J.

Table 2

H-Bonding geometry parameters (Å, °) for complexes 1 and 2

Complex D–H⋯A D–H (Å) H⋯A (Å) D⋯A (Å) D–H⋯A (°) Symmetry code
1 N(4)–H(4)⋯O(1) 0.86 1.93 2.732(7) 154.4 x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1
2 N(4)–H(4)⋯O(1) 0.86 1.92 2.757(4) 163.3 x + 1/2, −y + 1/2, −z
N(4)–H(4)⋯O(2) 0.86 2.53 3.167(4) 131.1 x + 1/2, −y + 1/2, −z
O(1W)–H(1A)⋯O(1) 0.85 1.99 2.837(4) 176.5
Figure 4 
                  View of the 2D layer structure of 1.
Figure 4

View of the 2D layer structure of 1.

Figure 5 
                  View of the 3D supramolecular structure of 1.
Figure 5

View of the 3D supramolecular structure of 1.

In addition, N–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bond (N(4)–H(4) = 0.86, H(4)∙∙∙O(1)iv = 1.93, N(4)∙∙∙O(1)iv = 2.732(7) Å, ∠ N(4)–H(4)∙∙∙O(1)iv = 154.4°, Table 2) further firms up the 3D supramolecular structure.

The asymmetric unit of 2 is composed of one Zn(ii) atom, an L ligand, a dhb anion, and a half-free water molecule. As shown in Figure 6, each Zn(ii) is coordinated by three nitrogen atoms from two different L ligands (N(1)–Zn(1) = 2.090(3), N(2)–Zn(1) = 2.130(3) and N(3)–Zn)–Zn(1)i = 2.073(3) Å) and two oxygen atoms from one bis-chelating dhb anion (O(2)–Zn(1) = 1.986(3) and O(3)–Zn(1)= 2.021(3) Å), in a twisted [ZnN3O2] square-pyramidal geometry (Table 1). The Zn–O (1.986(3) and 2.021(3) Å) and Zn–N (from 2.073(3) to 2.090(3) Å) distances are near to those reported observed in other analogous Zn(ii) CP [26]. The L ligand connecting two neighbouring Zn(ii) atoms to give a 1D chain along the c axis, as an uncommon µ 2-ligand in unprotonated phenanthroline derivatives, is displayed, and the Zn∙∙∙Zn distance is 8.015 Å (Figure 7).

Figure 6 
                  Coordination environment of the Zn(ii) ion of 2 (symmetry codes: i
                     x, −y, z − 1/2).
Figure 6

Coordination environment of the Zn(ii) ion of 2 (symmetry codes: i x, −y, z − 1/2).

Figure 7 
                  View of the double chains of 2 formed by π–π interactions.
Figure 7

View of the double chains of 2 formed by π–π interactions.

The dhb anions are located at one side of the chain in a bidentate fashion by two oxygen atoms. The adjacent chains turn into a double chain structure through π–π interactions [Cg5⋯Cg5iv, centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.670(3) Å, dihedral angle being 0.0(2)°, Table 1] (Figure 7). Ulteriorly, the dhb anions of double chains render π–π stacking interactions between the approximately parallel dhb anions (dihedral angle of 0.6(2)°) of adjacent double chains [Cg8⋯Cg8ii, centroid-to-centroid distance of 3.596(3) Å, Table 1], making the double chains to a 2D supramolecular layer (Figure 8). In addition, N–H∙∙∙O and O–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bonds (N(4)–H(4)∙∙∙O(1)iv, N(4)–H(4)∙∙∙O(2)iv, and O(1W)–H(1A)∙∙∙O(1), Table 2) make further efforts to stabilize the 2D supramolecular layer.

Figure 8 
                  View of the 2D supramolecular layer of 2.
Figure 8

View of the 2D supramolecular layer of 2.

3 Conclusions

In summary, two novel Zn(Ⅱ) CPs were synthesized and their structures were studied. CP 1 exhibits a 1D chain structure and the neighboring chains are connected through π–π interactions to generate a 2D supramolecular layer. The 2D supramolecular layers are joined together by another π–π interactions to yield 3D architecture, which stabilized the 3D by N–H∙∙∙O hydrogen bond. 2 shows 1D chain structure and further connected by π–π interactions interactions to form a double chain structure, which is extended into more stable 2D architecture.

Experimental

All chemicals and reagents were of commercial origin and obtained from Shanghai Hengfei Biological Technology Co., Ltd. and Henan Pusai Chemical Products Co., Ltd., China. Elemental analysis (C, H, N) was determined with a Perkin-Elmer 240 CHN elemental analyzer (Perkin-Elmer, North Waltham, USA).

Preparation of [Zn(L)(hta)] n (1)

The reagent Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O (0.1 mmol, 0.0220 g), L (0.1 mmol, 0.0365 g), heptanedioic acid (0.1 mmol, 0.0161 g), C2H5OH (1 mL), and 9 mL H2O were mixed, which was adjusted to pH = 5.16 by the addition of KOH solution (0.2 mmol·L−1) and placed in 20 mL Teflon-lined autoclave. The mixture was sealed and heated at 398 K for 4 days and then cooled slowly to room temperature. Yellow block crystals of 1 were collected in a 39% yield based on Zn. Anal. Calcd for C26H20Cl2N4O4Zn, %: C, 53.04%; H, 3.42%; N, 9.52%. Found: C, 52.38%; H, 3.38%; N, 9.43%.

Preparation of {[Zn2(L)2(dhb)2]·H2O} n (2)

The reagent Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O (0.2 mmol, 0.0439 g), L (0.2 mmol, 0.0730g), 3,5-dinitro-2-hydroxybenzoic acid (0.2 mmol, 0.0456 g), C2H5OH (1 mL), and 10 mL H2O were mixed, NaOH (0.2 mmol, 0.012 g) was added, which was measured to pH = 5.66, and then, the mixture was placed in 20 mL Teflon-lined autoclave, sealed and heated at 448 K for 4 days, and cooled slowly to room temperature. Yellow block crystals of 2 were collected in 51% yield based on Zn. Anal. Calcd for C52H26Cl4N12O15Zn2 (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3

Crystalline data and refinement parameters for complexes 1 and 2

Complex 1 2
Empirical formula C26H20Cl2N4O4Zn C52H26Cl4N12O15Zn2
Formula weight 588.73 1,331.39
Crystal system Monoclinic Monoclinic
Space group P21/c C2/c
a (Å) 11.284(2) 24.268(2)
b (Å) 11.382(2) 14.5813(15)
c (Å) 18.517(4) 15.7042(16)
α (°) 90 90
β (°) 90.87(3) 94.148(2)
γ (°) 90 90
Volume (Å3) 2,377.9(8) 5,542.5(10)
Z 4 4
D c (g·cm−3) 1.644 1.596
µ (mm−1) 1.301 1.138
F(000) 1,200 2,680
θ range (°) 3.345–25.008 1.630–25.007
Crystal size (mm) 0.185 × 0.102 × 0.086 0.215 × 0.172 × 0.137
Tot. reflections 17,965 15,431
Uniq. reflections, R int 4,133, 0.1136 4,857, 0.0369
GOF on F 2 1.035 1.059
R 1 indices [I > 2σ(I)] 0.0635 0.0531
wR 2 indices (all data) 0.1724 0.1516
ρ min, ∆ρ max (e·Å−3) 0.483, −0.857 0.714, −0.917
CCDC No. 2304359 2304360
Table 4

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) for the complexes 1 and 2

Complex 1
Bond Dist. Bond Dist.
N(1)–Zn(1) 2.106(5) O(3)–Zn(1) 1.994(5)
N(2)–Zn(1) 2.090(5) O(4)–Zn(1) 2.405(7)
O(2)–Zn(1) 1.954(4)
Angle (°) Angle (°)
O(2)–Zn(1)–O(3)ii 112.0(2) N(2)–Zn(1)–N(1) 79.59(19)
O(2)–Zn(1)–N(2) 120.43(18) O(2)–Zn(1)–O(4)ii 111.4(2)
O(3)ii–Zn(1)–N)–N(2) 103.6(2) O(3)ii–Zn(1)–O(4)ii 57.7(2)
O(2)–Zn(1)–N(1) 101.30(19) N(2)–Zn(1)–O(4)ii 128.0(2)
O(3)ii–Zn(1)–N(1) 137.6(2) N(1)–Zn(1)–O(4)ii 86.66(18)
Complex 2
Bond Dist. Bond Dist.
N(1)–Zn(1) 2.090(3) O(2)–Zn(1) 1.986(3)
N(2)–Zn(1) 2.130(3) O(3)–Zn(1) 2.021(3)
N(3)–Zn(1)i 2.073(3)
Angle (°) Angle (°)
O(2)–Zn(1)–O(3) 87.88(12) N(3)–Zn(1)–N(1) 116.37(13)
O(2)–Zn(1)–N(3) 121.76(13) O(2)–Zn(1)–N(2) 86.02(13)
O(3)–Zn(1)–N(3) 98.10(13) O(3)–Zn(1)–N(2) 161.92(13)
O(2)–Zn(1)–N(1) 121.46(13) N(3)–Zn(1)–N(2) 99.58(14)
O(3)–Zn(1)–N)–N(1) 90.49(12) N(1)–Zn(1)–N(2) 78.31(13)

Complex 1: Symmetry codes: ix + 2, y + 1/2, −z + 3/2, iix + 2, y − 1/2, −z + 3/2.

Complex 2: Symmetry codes: i x, −y, z − 1/2, iix + 1, y, −z + 1/2, x, −y, z + 1/2.

X-ray crystallography

X-ray diffraction studies of 1 and 2 were measured on a Rigaku RAXIS-RAPID diffractometer, equipped with graphite-monochromatized Mo- radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) using the ω scan technique at 296(2)K. The structures were solved using programs named SIR2014 [27] and SHELXL2018/3 [28] and refined by a full-matrix least-squares technique based on F 2. Non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters, and hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using a riding atom. The disordered solvent water molecules in 2 were taken away by PLATON SQUEEZE [29]. The SQUEEZE calculations make clear that a total disordered solvent accessible area volume is 752 Å3 and the residual electron density is 176 e per unit cell involving about 17 water molecules (about 4.25 water molecules per asymmetric unit). The disordered solvent water molecules’ contributions are not contained in its formula weight. The structure refinement parameters and detailed crystallographic data of 1 and 2 have been collected in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, and CCDC numbers for 1 and 2 are 2304359 and 2304360.

  1. Funding information: This research was supported by the Scientific and Technological Developing Scheme of Siping (No. 2016048).

  2. Author contributions: Huilin Wang: writing – original draft, experimental work, and editing, Xin Wang: data curation and synthesized, Meimiao Li: investigation, collecting data, and validation, Jindong Feng: supervision and writing – review.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Taraneh H, Ali M, Maciej K. Two new Cd(II) and Hg(II) coordination polymers containing 4-halo-N-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)aniline ligands: synthesis, nanostructure synthesis and crystal structure analysis. Polyhedron. 2015;100:257–63.10.1016/j.poly.2015.08.031Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wang Y, Shi YL, Li ZY, Wang HY, Qiu JK, Xuan XP, et al. Defects in a metal–organic framework fabricated by carboxy-functionalized ionic liquids for enhancing NH3 uptake. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2022;10(37):12457–65.10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04211Search in Google Scholar

[3] Guan HR, Qi MX, Shi LF, Liu WS, Yang LZ, Dou W. Ratiometric luminescent thermometer based on the lanthanide metal–organic frameworks by thermal curing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(14):18114–24.10.1021/acsami.3c01897Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Wu YP, Tian JW, Liu S, Li B, Zhao J, Ma LF, et al. Bi-Microporous metal-organic frameworks with cubane [M4(OH)4] (M = Ni, Co) clusters and pore space partition for electrocatalytic methanol oxidation reaction. Angew Chem. 2019;58(35):12185–89.10.1002/anie.201907136Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Li ZR, Zhao JQ, Lou MQ, Wang XY. Synthesis and structural characterization of a novel lead coordination polymer: [Pb(L)(1,3-bdc)]·2H2O. Main Group Met Chem. 2022;45:202–7.10.1515/mgmc-2022-0021Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sun SW, Sun YY, Guo HD, Fu XR, Guo MM, Liu SY, et al. Construction of Cd(II) coordination polymers from a fluorene-based bisimidazole ligand and polycarboxylic acids: syntheses, structures and properties. Inorg Chem Acta. 2018;483:165–72.10.1016/j.ica.2018.08.018Search in Google Scholar

[7] Yu CY, Li H, Luo JW, Zheng MK, Zhong WB, Yang WT. Metal-organic coordination polymer/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composites to prepare N-doped hierarchical porous carbon for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochim Acta. 2018;284:69–79.10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.176Search in Google Scholar

[8] Sandipan R, Hatem MT, Bharat KT, Nisith B, Roli V, Israel G. Silver coordination polymers based on newly designed bis(cyanobenzyl)bipiperidine ligand: synthesis, anion exchange, guest inclusion, electrochemical, and photoluminescence properties. Cryst Growth Des. 2016;16:2814–25.10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00151Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zhang WJ, Li DY, Song B. Two Cu(II)-based coordination polymers: photocatalytic dye degradation and thyroid cancer activity by inducing ROS mediated cancer cell apoptosis. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2020;30:3989–98.10.1007/s10904-020-01542-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] Roy M, Adhikary A, Mondal AK, Mondal R. Multifunctional properties of a 1D helical Co(II) coordination polymer: toward single-ion magnetic behavior and efficient dye degradation. ACS Omega. 2018;3:15315–24.10.1021/acsomega.8b02212Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Zhang X, Liu LW, Hao ZC, Cui GH. Supramolecular assembly of three Ag(I) coordination polymers derived from flexible N-containing ligands and polycarboxylates: synthesis, structures, and catalytic properties. Transit Met Chem. 2016;41:459–66.10.1007/s11243-016-0041-8Search in Google Scholar

[12] Zhou Z, He C, Yang L, Wang Y, Liu T, Duan C. Alkyne activation by a porous silver coordination polymer for heterogeneous catalysis of carbon dioxide cycloaddition. ACS Catal. 2017;7:2248–56.10.1021/acscatal.6b03404Search in Google Scholar

[13] Wang XW, Su YQ, Blatov VA, Cui GH. Three Zn(II) luminescent coordination polymers as sensors for the sensing of levofloxacin and benzaldehyde. J Mol Struct. 2023;1272:134239.10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.134239Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wang BC, Li XP, Hao BB, Zhang CX, Wang QL. Dual-functional coordination polymer with high proton conductivity and a low-detection-limit fluorescent probe. J Phys Chem B. 2021;125:12627–35.10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c08304Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Chen FG, Xu W, Chen J, Xiao HP, Wang HY, Chen ZY, et al. Dysprosium(III) metal–organic framework demonstrating ratiometric luminescent detection of pH, magnetism, and proton conduction. Inorg Chem. 2022;61:5388–96.10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00242Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Zhao D, Ma FX, Zhang RH. Synthesis and crystal structures of two coordination polymers based on a new N-donor aromatic ligand. J Struct Chem. 2018;59:1678–83.10.1134/S0022476618070223Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zuo WY, Fan YF, Yang LJ, Cui LS. Synthesis, structure and photocatalytic dye degradation ability of Co(II)-based coordination polymers. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2020;30:2105–13.10.1007/s10904-019-01356-0Search in Google Scholar

[18] Senthilkumar S, Goswami R, Obasi NL, Neogi S. Construction of pillar-layer metal–organic frameworks for CO2 adsorption under humid climate: high selectivity and sensitive detection of picric acid in water. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2017;5:11307–15.10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02087Search in Google Scholar

[19] Chen SS, Han SS, Ma CB, Li WD, Zhao Y. A series of metal–organic frameworks: syntheses, structures and luminescent detection, gas adsorption, magnetic properties. Cryst Growth Des. 2021;21:869–85.10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01221Search in Google Scholar

[20] Song Y, Yan Y, Zhang H, Wang XY. Synthesis and structural characterization of a novel 2D supramolecular lead coordination polymer with phenanthroline derivate and adipic acid. Main Group Met Chem. 2021;44:239–42.10.1515/mgmc-2021-0025Search in Google Scholar

[21] Huang YJ, Pan YR, Du G, Cao YX. Extended structures of two coordination polymers based on 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives: Preparation, structural characterization and properties. J Chem Sci. 2016;128:459–65.10.1007/s12039-016-1035-ySearch in Google Scholar

[22] Song Y, Fu TX, Ning JB, Wang XY, Liu JX, Chang LM. Syntheses, structure and characterization of a new Pb(II) coordination polymer based on 1,10-phenanthroline derivative and 5-hydroxyisophthalic acid. J Clust Sci. 2024;35:217–23.10.1007/s10876-023-02478-9Search in Google Scholar

[23] Alizadeh R, Amani V, Seyfi S, Alemohammad A, Zarepoor Harms FK. Synthesis, characterization, crystal structure determination and luminescence study of new linear coordination polymers based on Mercury(II), Cadmium(II) and 4,7-phenanthroline ligand. J Mol Struct. 2019;1175:450–7.10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.08.005Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hernandeza B, Nareaa P, Espinozab D, Navarretec A, Aguirrec G, Delgadoa GE, et al. Novel Zn(II) and Cd(II) coordination polymers derived from 1,2,3-triazole-1,3-diketone ligand. Syntheses and structural, thermal, computational, and luminescent studies. J Solid State Chem. 2022;312:123156.10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123156Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kaeosamut N, Chimupala Y, Yimklan S. Anion-controlled synthesis of enantiomeric twofold interpenetrated 3D Zinc(II) coordination polymer with ligand substitution-induced single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation and photocatalysis. Cryst Growth Des. 2021;21:2942–53.10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00103Search in Google Scholar

[26] Feng JD, Su BH, Yi XX, Kong ZG, Chang LM. Two new zinc(ii) coordination complexes constructed by phenanthroline derivate: Synthesis and structure. Main Group Met Chem. 2023;46:20228042.10.1515/mgmc-2022-8042Search in Google Scholar

[27] Burla MC, Caliandro R, Carrozzini B, Cascarano GL, Cuocci C, Giacovazzo C, et al. Crystal structure determination and refinement via SIR2014. J Appl Cryst. 2015;48:306–9.10.1107/S1600576715001132Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sheldrick GM. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015;C71:3–8.10.1107/S2053229614024218Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Spek AL. PLATON SQUEEZE: a tool for the calculation of the disordered solvent contribution to the calculated structure factors. Acta Crystallogr C. 2015;71:9–18.10.1107/S2053229614024929Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-12-10
Accepted: 2024-03-25
Published Online: 2024-05-20

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mgmc-2023-0033/html
Scroll to top button