The number of negative lymph nodes is positively associated with survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients in China

Lan Yu; Xiao-Tao Zhang; Shang-Hui Guan; Yu-Feng Cheng; Lin-Xi Li

doi:10.1515/med-2020-0023

Artikel Open Access

The number of negative lymph nodes is positively associated with survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients in China

Lan Yu , Xiao-Tao Zhang , Shang-Hui Guan , Yu-Feng Cheng und Lin-Xi Li

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. März 2020

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen Erkunden Sie dieses Fachgebiet

Aus der Zeitschrift Open Medicine Band 15 Heft 1

Abstract

Background

There is a controversial relationship between the negative lymph nodes (NLNs) and survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study investigates the implications of total number of NLNs on thoracic ESCC patient prognosis.

Methods

579 thoracic ESCC patients were categorized into four groups (0-9, 10-14, 15-19 and ≥20 NLNs). Univariate analysis was done by the log-rank tests while multivariate analysis was undertaken using Cox regression models. Survival analysis was determined employing the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

When the numbers of NLNs were 9 or less, 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 or more, patients of 3-year survival rates were 21.7%, 40.0%, 61.2% and 77.5%, respectively (P<0.001). In the node-negative and node-positive subgroups, 3-year survival rates were 34.9% and 14.3%, 50.9% and 19.3%, 65.6% and 51.8%, 81.4% and 68.9% respectively (P<0.001). Gender, tumor length, tumor differentiation, T and N stage as well as the total NLNs were found to be significantly linked to survival rates. Multivariate analysis showed tumor length, T stage, N stage and total NLNs were independent prognostic factors for ESCC patients.

Conclusion

NLNs numbers is a significant independent prognostic indicator for thoracic ESCC patients’ survival after curative esophagectomy.

Keywords: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Lymph node; Esophagectomy; Metastasis; Prognosis

1 Introduction

Esophageal carcinoma (EC) is a frequently encountered cancer and a major contributor of deaths attributed to cancer worldwide [1]. This condition is found at the highest rates in Eastern Asia as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa [1]. In 2015, China reported an approximate 477,900 newly diagnosed EC patients and 375,000 EC-related mortalities [2]. The 2 main pathological types of esophageal cancer are adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Upwards of 90% of patients with EC have the SCC subtype, especially in populations such as China where EC is rampant [3]. Despite advancements in multidisciplinary treatment in recent years, complete resection is still the only treatment that can cure EC. Previous literatures have suggested that the total metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) represents an independent prognostic factor in determining EC patients’ survival rates [4, 5]. Although the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system recommends that a total dissection of at least 15 LNs are necessary to accurately stage patients undergoing esophagectomy without induction chemoradiation, there are controversies about the optimal extent of LN dissection during radical lymphadenectomy [6, 7].

In recent years，the number of NLNs has been confirmed to be an important factor related to patient survival in many cancers, proving to be more accurate than the number of positive LNs in predicting patients’ prognosis [8, 9, 10]. Several papers have scrutinized the impact of NLNs on patient survival for EC [11, 12, 13]. Greenstein et al. [12] found that an increasing NLNs count was related to with long-term patient survival in those with lymph node-negative esophageal adenocarcinoma but not in those with the squamous cell subtype. Another study demonstrated that NLNs count was an advantageous prognostic indicator in lymph node-positive EC patients but not in those who were lymph node-negative [13]. Wu et al. [14] draw the conclusion that the number of NLNs was an independent prognostic factor for node-negative EC through a retrospective review of 429 EC patients who underwent modern two-field lymphadenectomy. These results are controversial and need to be further investigated. In the present investigation, we assessed the relationship between the number of NLNs and prognosis of patients with ESCC after curative esophagectomy.

2 Methods

2.1 Study population

579 patients diagnosed with thoracic ESCC who underwent curative esophagectomy at the Department of thoracic surgery, Qilu hospital, Shandong University, China, between January 2009 and December 2012 were involved in this retrospective analysis. Patient ages ranging between 40 to 70 years; a diagnosis of thoracic ESCC (confirmed via histopathology); had not received preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy; no second primary tumor history; comprehensive preoperative examination including upper gastrointestinal imaging, chest and upper abdomen enhanced computed tomography, neck color doppler ultrasonography and gastroscope; complete resection(R0); complete clinical data and at least 3 years of follow-up or death; survival time more than three months were all inclusion factors for this study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with non-cancer related death; no R0 resection; cervical esophageal cancer or those lost to follow-up. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Qilu hospital, Shandong University. All patients obtained informed consent and signed the informed consent form.

There were 579 cases including 486 male and 93 female participants. All patients were aged between 40 to 70 years with a median age of 61 years. There were 51 cases with upper thoracic tumors, 227 cases with middle thoracic tumors and 301 cases with lower thoracic tumors. Based on histological examination, 92 cases were determined to be well differentiated, 256 were moderately differentiated, while 231 were poorly differentiated. Based on the 7th edition of AJCC classification, there were 79 cases (13.6%) for stage I, 307 cases (53.0%) for stage II and 193 cases (33.3%) for stage III.

2.2 Surgical procedures

All 579 patients underwent trans-thoracic esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy, including two-field (mediastinal and abdominal) LN dissection or three-field (mediastinal, abdominal and cervical) LN dissection. The NLN is the LNs retrieved during radical lymphadenectomy which were not found to have tumor cell metastasis in pathological examination. The number of NLNs is the quantity of LNs retrieved during radical lymphadenectomy minus the count of metastatic LNs.

2.3 Follow-up

Follow-up was performed by means of out-patient review, hospital review, phone calls and letters after surgery. Patients were followed-up every quarter for the initial two years, biannually from years three to five and annually thereafter. All patients received a comprehensive medical examination including routine blood investigations, liver and kidney function, upper gastrointestinal imaging, chest and upper abdomen enhanced computed tomography, neck color Doppler ultrasonography, gastroscope, brain magnetic resonance and bone scintigraphy imaging when they were followed up. In this study, all subjects were monitored for at least three years post-surgery or until death. Patients who failed to meet this requirement were labeled as lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. In the end, 579 patients met the criteria for inclusion in this study. Data collection concluded on December 2015.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Log-rank tests were used to carry out univariate analysis while Cox regression models were employed for multivariate analysis. Patient survival was defined as the surgery date to the last point of follow-up or death, and was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. A P-value<0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance. All calculations were carried out employing the SPSS program version 23 (SPSS, IBM, USA).

Univariate analysis variables comprised of age (≤60 years and >60 years), gender (male or female), tumor length (<4 cm and ≥4 cm), location of the tumor (upper, middle and lower), tumor differentiation (poorly, moderately and well differentiated), T stage (T1, T2, T3 and T4), N stage (N0, N1, N2, and N3) as well as the number of NLNs (0-9, 10-14, 15-19 and ≥20 NLNs). Multivariate analysis involved tumor length, T stage, N stage and the number of NLNs.

3 Results

3.1 Long-term surgical outcomes

All 579 patients were followed up for a median of 36 months (total range between 3 to 80 months). Overall, patients had an average survival time of 33.9 months and 50.8% (294/579) of them had a 3-year survival rate. The 3-year survival rates of patients with stage I, stage II and stage III were 86.1% (68/79), 53.7% (165/307) and 31.6% (61/193) respectively (χ2 = 71.864, P<0.001).

3.2 Total number of LNs dissected

The total quantity of LNs dissected for all patients was 8015 (range, 0-53; median 12; mean 12.7±7.8) and the total number of NLNs for the entire cohort was 7366 (range, 1-53; median 13; mean 13.8±8.2). There were 344 node-negative patients whose total number of LNs dissection was 4627 (range, 1-41; median 12; mean 13.5±8.0) and 235 node-positive patients whose total number of LNs dissection was 3388(range, 1-53; median 14; mean 14.2±8.3).

3.3 The effect of total LNs on node-negative patient survival

All participants were grouped into 4 categories as follows, based on the number of NLNs: 0-9 NLNs (120 cases), 10-14 NLNs (165 cases), 15-19 NLNs (152 cases) and ≥20 NLNs (142 cases). When the numbers of NLNs were 9 or less, 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 or more, the median survival time was 13 months, 27 months, 39 months and 47 months (P<0.001) respectively, and the 3-year patient survival rates were 21.7% (26/120), 40.0% (66/165), 61.2% (92/152) and 77.5% (110/142) respectively（P<0.001), as shown in Table 1 and Fig 1.

Figure 1

The overall survival curve for all patients with 9 or less, 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 or more NLNs

Table 1

The survival characteristics of the node-negative and node-positive subgroups.

Number of NLNs	All patients(n=579)			node-negative patients(n=344)			node-positive patients(n=235)
	No	MST(m)	3-year survival (%)	No	MST(m)	3-year survival (%)	No	MST(m) 3-year survival (%)
0-9	120	13	21.7% (26/120)	43	18	34.9% (15/43)	77	12	14.3% (11/77)
10-14	165	27	40.0% (66/165)	108	36	50.9% (55/108)	57	22	19.3% (11/57)
15-19	152	39	61.2% (92/152)	96	42.5	65.6% (63/96)	56	36	51.8% (29/56)
≥20	142	47	77.5% (110/142)	97	48	89.0%(79/97)	45	45	68.9% (31/45)

3.4 The effect of the number of NLNs on node-negative patient survival

There were 344 node-negative patients who were categorized into 4 cohorts as follows, based on the number of NLNs: 0-9 NLNs (43 cases), 10-14 NLNs (108 cases), 15-19 NLNs (96 cases), ≥20 NLNs (97 cases). When the numbers of NLNs were 9 or less, 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 or more, the median survival time (MST) was 18 months, 36 months, 42.5 months and 48 months (P<0.001) and the 3-year survival rates of patients were 34.9% (15/43), 50.9% (55/108), 65.6%（63/96）and 89.0%（79/97）respectively (P<0.001), as shown in Table 1 and Fig 2.

Figure 2

The overall survival curve for node-negative patients with 9 or less, 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 or more NLNs

3.5 The effect of the number of NLNs on node-positive patient survival

There were 235 node-positive patients who were categorized into 4 cohorts as follows, based on the number of NLNs: 0-9 NLNs (77 cases), 10-14 NLNs (57 cases), 15-19 NLNs (56 cases), ≥20 NLNs (45 cases). When the numbers of NLNs were 9 or less, 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 or more, the MST was 12 months, 22 months, 36 months and 45 months (P<0.001) and the 3-year survival rates of patients were 14.3% (11/77), 19.3% (11/57), 51.8% (29/56) and 68.9% (31/45) respectively (P<0.001), as shown in Table 1 and Fig 3.

Figure 3

The overall survival curve for node-positive patients with 9 or less, 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 or more NLNs

3.6 Univariate and multivariate survival analysis

Univariate analysis indicated that significant factors that influences the 3-year overall survival (OS) after esophagectomy were gender (P=0.023), tumor length (P=0.000), tumor differentiation (P=0.011), T stage (P=0.000), N stage (P=0.000) as well as the number of NLNs (P=0.000) (Table 2). Further analysis using multivariate methods indicated that significant factors affecting the 3-year OS after esophagectomy were tumor length (P=0.042), T stage (P=0.000), N stage (P=0.000) and the number of NLNs (P=0.000) (Table 2).

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival.

Characteristics	N	3-year survival (%)	Univariate analysis		Multivariate analysis
			χ2	P	HR (95%CI)	P
Sex			5.163	0.023
Male	486	49.0%
Female	93	60.2%
Age			0.479	0.489
<60	260	52.3%
≥60	319	49.5%
Tumor location			0.808	0.668
Upper	51	47.1%
Middle	227	52.4%
Lower	301	50.2%
Tumor length(cm)			19.466	0.000		0.042
≤4	365	57.5%			Reference
>4	214	39.3%			1.260(1.009-1.575)
Tumor differatiation			9.019	0.011
Poorly differatiated	231	48.1%
Moderately differatiated	256	48.0%
Well differatiated	92	65.2%
T stage			49.654	0.000		0.000
T1	54	94.4%			Reference
T2	167	59.9%			2.344(1.268-4.332)
T3	353	40.2%			3.363(1.848-6.119)
T4	5	20.0%			4.565(1.418-14.700)
N stage			62.587	0.000		0.000
N0	344	61.9%			Reference
N1	141	39,7%			1.550(1.205-1.994)
N2	71	26.8%			2.021(1.467-2.785)
N3	23	26.1%			2.135(1.317-3.461)
Number of NLNs			120.475	0.000		0.000
0-9	120	21.7%			Reference
10-14	165	40.0%			0.500(0.378-0.662)
15-19	152	61.2%			0.314(0.232-0.426)
≥20	142	77.5%			0.199(0.141-0.280)

NLN, negative lymph nodes; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

4 Discussion

The LN metastasis is a significant prognostic indicator for ESCC [15]. However, the extent of dissected LNs may influence pathological node staging and subsequently affect the prognosis of ESCC patients. Indeed, current literature demonstrates that the amount of LNs dissected is a significant prognostic factor for ESCC patients after curative esophagectomy [16, 17].

Several studies confirmed the number of NLNs was more accurate than the number of positive LNs in predicting patients outcomes. Nevertheless, there is still controversy between the number of NLNs and survival in EC patients. One of several studies investigating the number of NLNs and its effect on EC patient survival, Zhu et al. [18] studied 332 patients with thoracic ESCC who had at least 15 or more LNs dissected via three-field lymphadenectomy(3FLND) retrospectively and revealed that patients that possessed higher counts of NLNs were more likely to survive longer in contrast to those who had less NLNs. This was found to be true in both node-positive and -negative patients. Therefore, this investigation concluded that NLN number may serve to be able to independently prognosticate ESCC patients who received 3FLND. Another study using data of 972 patients with node-negative EC extracted from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) database investigated the NLNs number on their postoperative survival. This study revealed that an elevated count of NLNs was directly proportional with increased patient survival in those with EC adenocarcinoma subtype, but not in those with squamous cell subtype [12]. Baba et al. [11] investigated 252 patients with surgically resected ESCC from a single center and demonstrated that the number of NLNs carried positive prognostic value in patients with positive LNs but not with those with negative LNs.

In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the impact of NLNs number on the survival of a total of 579 thoracic ESCC patients from a single center who all received curative esophagectomy. Ma et al. [13] demonstrated that ESCC patients with more than 20 NLNs have better survival rates in contrast to those with less than or equal to 20 NLNs, through retrospective analysis of 381 patients who had underwent surgical resection. Zhang et al. [19] retrospectively analyzed 99 patients who were identified with middle thoracic ESCC after esophagectomy and found obvious differences of OS between the following groups: patients with more than and less than 10 NLNs and patients with＞15 and ⩽15 NLNs. Based on the above research evidences, we categorizes the NLNs into 4 groups (0-9, 10-14, 15-19 and ≥20 NLNs) to further explore the relationship between the number of NLNs and prognosis of patients with ESCC after curative esophagectomy. When the number of NLNs were 9 or less, 10 to 14, 15 to 19 and 20 or more, the 3-year survival rate of patients were 21.7%, 40.0%, 61.2% and 77.5% respectively (P=0.000). In the node-negative subgroup and the node-positive subgroup, 3-year survival rate were 34.9% and 14.3%, 50.9% and 19.3%, 65.6% and 51.8%, 81.4% and 68.9% respectively (P=0.000). We found that thoracic ESCC patients with higher numbers of NLNs were more likely to have better survival rates in contrast to those with less NLNs, irrespective of their node-positive or -negative status. This concurs with the results of another retrospective study on 381 ESCC patients who also received tumor resections that demonstrated that the total NLNs were strongly linked with overall patient survival time. In this study, 45.4% of patients with more than 20 NLNs passed the 5-year survival rate mark, while only 26.4% of 239 patients with less than or equal to 20 NLNs (P=0.001) had a 5-year survival rate [13]. Zhang et al. (19) found the total NLNs count was more significant than any other parameters and the overall survival time and determined that those with less than 5 NLNs had markedly different survival times in comparison to those who had more than 5 NLNs. This finding was also true at threshold numbers of 10 and 15 NLNs. Moreover, in this study, univariate analysis indicated that gender, tumor length, tumor differentiation, T and N stage as well as the total of NLNs served as independent prognostic factors. Only tumor length, T and N stage as well as total NLNs appeared as independent prognostic factors after subsequent multivariate analysis. Similarly, multivariate analyses by Ma et al. [13] on ESCC patients also supported TNM factors as well as the total NLNs dissected to be independent prognostic factors in determining patients’ fates.

The results from our study was similar to those of Zhu et al, but was different from Baba et al, Ma et al, and Greenstein et al. The first possible potential reason is the inconsistency of enrolled population and the inclusion criteria. The second possible reason is the differences of surgical approach and extent of lymph node dissection in researches of different years, and the third possible potential reason is the differences of grouping criteria for NLNs.

Our study did not identify the potential mechanism underlying survival and total number of NLNs. Several theories have been put forward by some researchers. The first theory is stage migration which indicates that dissecting more LNs may uncover more node metastases, which can provide more accurate information on pathological node staging and reduce the possibility of inaccurate staging [20]. One population-based propensity score-adjusted study demonstrated that more retrieved regional LNs in pancreatic cancer decreased the rate of stage migration and improved the oncological outcome in node-negative and -positive cancer [21]. Woo et al. [22] found that more accurate staging was achieved with more LN resection, while inadequate LN dissection is implicated in under staging of patients. Researchers have previously demonstrated that immunohistochemical analyses have shown that a high rate of LN-negative patients have nodal micrometastases which were missed during routine pathology examinations [23]. Thus, increased number of removed NLNs could eliminate some potential remnant lesions and reduce the potential of micrometastases and subsequent tumor recurrence and metastasis. This also explains why patients with more NLNs had better survival in our study. Our study also demonstrates less NLNs is related to poorer survival, supporting the hypothesis of stage migration. The second explanation is that an increased number of NLNs reflects a stronger immune reaction to the tumor. He et al. [24] found a high number of NLNs was an indicator of greater lymphocyte infiltration, not only in the invasive central but also in the margin region of tumor microenvironment. The favorable prognosis brought about by higher numbers of NLNs could reflect the immune response of host lymph node cells to tumor cells, which is related to LN count. In addition, lymph nodes response to primary tumors has been proven to be linked to longer patient survival in the case of those with colorectal cancer [25]. Zhang et al. [26] discovered that the LN status at station 108 may indicated the prognosis of ESCC patients, and NLN may reflected the reaction of the immune system to tumor metastasis in these patients. The third hypothesis is that a greater number of retrieved LNs could be a representative of the proficiency and quality of surgical treatment and subsequent pathological examination [27].

There are three limitations in our study. Firstly, patients in our study came from the same institution, thus our findings may not be applicable to the general population. The potential reasons may be that there are many significant geographical differences for EC [28]. In addition, there may have regional differences in surgical approach and the extent of LN dissection. Second, the study does not provide information on the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy on patients, both of which may affect patient prognosis. Thirdly, our study was not able to adequately explore the mechanistic relationship between patient survival and number of NLNs, and was also not able to define the optimal number of NLNs for ESCC patients.

Nevertheless, this investigation supports NLNs number as a factor able to independently prognosticate patients with patients with thoracic ESCC. Therefore, to improve survival rates, we suggest that more LNs should be retrieved to increase the number of NLNs under the premise of controlling surgical complications. Future studies are necessary to identify the potential mechanism underlying the link between patient survival and the number of NLNs as well as to explore the optimal NLN dissection number for ESCC.

Acknowledgment

Thanks to all the medical staff and family members who care for these patients.

Disclosure: All authors hereby declare no competing interests that may have interfered with the unbiased construction of this paper.

References

[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-42410.3322/caac.21492Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115-13210.3322/caac.21338Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87-10810.3322/caac.21262Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Xu XL, Zheng WH, Zhu SM, Zhao A, Mao WM. The Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Involvement in Large Scale Operable Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A 10-Year Experience. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e013307610.1371/journal.pone.0133076Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Kayani B, Zacharakis E, Ahmed K, Hanna GB. Lymph node metastases and prognosis in oesophageal carcinoma--a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(9):747-75310.1016/j.ejso.2011.06.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Strong VE , D'Amico TA, Kleinberg L, Ajani J. Impact of the 7th Edition AJCC staging classification on the NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology for gastric and esophageal cancers.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013 ;11(1):60-6610.6004/jnccn.2013.0009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, Chen LQ, Schipper PH, Kesler KA, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(1):46-5010.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6eeSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Johnson PM, Porter GA, Ricciardi R, Baxter NN. Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(22):3570-357510.1200/JCO.2006.06.8866Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Li X, Lu H, Xu K, Wang H, Liang X, Hu Z. Negative lymph node count is an independent prognostic factor for patients with rectal cancer who received preoperative radiotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):22710.1186/s12885-017-3222-8Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Zhao X, Wei J, Li X, Yang H, Wang P, Cao S. Increasing negative lymph node count predicts favorable OS and DSS in breast cancer with different lymph node-positive subgroups. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e019378410.1371/journal.pone.0193784Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Baba Y, Watanabe M, Shigaki H, Iwagami S, Ishimoto T, Iwatsuki M, et al. Negative lymph-node count is associated with survival in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery. 2013;153(2):234-24110.1016/j.surg.2012.08.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Greenstein AJ, Litle VR, Swanson SJ, Divino CM, Packer S, Wisnivesky JP. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(6):1239-124610.1002/cncr.23309Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Ma M, Tang P, Jiang H, Gong L, Duan X, Shang X, et al. Number of negative lymph nodes as a prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017;13(5):e278-e8310.1111/ajco.12567Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Wu H, Liu C, Xu M, Guo M, Xu S, Xie M. Prognostic value of the number of negative lymph nodes in esophageal carcinoma without lymphatic metastasis. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9(9):1129-113510.1111/1759-7714.12796Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Sugawara K, Yamashita H, Uemura Y, Mitsui T, Yagi K, Nishida M, et al. Numeric pathologic lymph node classification shows prognostic superiority to topographic pN classification in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surgery. 2017;162(4):846-85610.1016/j.surg.2017.06.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Altorki NK, Zhou XK, Stiles B, Port JL, Paul S, Lee PC, et al. Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248(2):221-22610.1097/SLA.0b013e31817bbe59Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Altorki NK, Ancona E, Griffin SM, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):549-55610.1097/SLA.0b013e318188c474Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Zhu Z, Chen H, Yu W, Fu X, Xiang J, Li H, et al. Number of negative lymph nodes is associated with survival in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing three-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(9):2857-286310.1245/s10434-014-3665-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Zhang J, Heng X, Luo Y, Fu Q, Li Z, Che F, et al. Influence of negative lymph node in No 7 on survival of patients with middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:1831-183710.2147/OTT.S94236Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Chandarana M, Jiwnani S, Karimundackal G, Pramesh CS. Lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer: the real issues. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(1):389-39010.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.01.040Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Warschkow R, Widmann B, Beutner U, Marti L, Steffen T, Schiesser M, et al. The More the Better-Lower Rate of Stage Migration and Better Survival in Patients With Retrieval of 20 or More Regional Lymph Nodes in Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Propensity Score Matched and Trend SEER Analysis. Pancreas. 2017;46(5):648-65710.1097/MPA.0000000000000784Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Woo Y, Goldner B, Ituarte P, Lee B, Melstrom L, Son T, et al. Lymphadenectomy with Optimum of 29 Lymph Nodes Retrieved Associated with Improved Survival in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A 25,000-Patient International Database Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(4):546-55510.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Komukai S NT, Watanabe H, Ajioka Y, Suzuki T, Hatakeyama K. Significance of immunohistochemically demonstrated micrometastases to lymph nodes in esophageal cancer with histologicallynegative nodes. Surgery. 2000; 127(1):40-4610.1067/msy.2000.102754Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] He WZ, Xie QK, Hu WM, Kong PF, Yang L, Yang YZ, et al. An increased number of negative lymph nodes is associated with a higher immune response and longer survival in colon cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:1597-160410.2147/CMAR.S160100Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] George S, Primrose J, Talbot R, Smith J, Mullee M, Bailey D, et al. Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(7):841-84710.1038/sj.bjc.6603352Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Zhang J, Heng X, Luo Y, Li L, Zhang H, Che F, et al. Negative lymph node at station 108 is a strong predictor of overall survival in esophageal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(5):6705-671210.3892/ol.2018.9456Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] Huang CM, Lin JX, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Lin BJ. Effect of negative lymph node count on survival for gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(6):481-48710.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Deng J, Chen H, Zhou D, Zhang J, Chen Y, Liu Q, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between Asian and Caucasian patient populations. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):153310.1038/s41467-017-01730-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2019-02-20

Accepted: 2019-11-26

Published Online: 2020-03-08

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2020-0023

Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Lymph node; Esophagectomy; Metastasis; Prognosis

Creative Commons

BY 4.0