Abstract
Contracts, as a form of institutions, have an influence on efficiency. Other conditions being the same, different contracts lead to different efficiency. Unlike property rights which require compulsory implementation by law, contracts rely mainly on the contracting parties’ voluntary implementation due to the fact that they are reached by two or more contracting parties in unanimity. Therefore, in cases where property institutions cannot be altered fast enough due to political or ideological reasons, reforms can be achieved by the modification of contracts, which result in similar effects at a lower cost. This is the case for China’s reforms, especially in agriculture: the land ownership in rural areas— collective land property rights have not changed in name, but the contracts between farmers and the state, or the collectives, have changed tremendously to bring about remarkable economic growth. In a more general sense, it has happened once and again in human history when property institutions—judicial institutions—cannot be changed due to political or other reasons, or due to brutal bloodshed or war in prospect. Therefore, as an option, the change of contract exists as a more common, and unconscious but effective form of institutional change.
References
Alchian, Armen, and Demsetz, Harold. 1973.“The Property Rights Paradigm,” The Journal of Economic History 33(1):16–27.10.1017/S0022050700076403Search in Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen. 1977. Economic Forces at Work. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Pixian, et al. 1996. DENG Zihui: A Biography. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven. 1974. “A Theory of Price Control,” The Journal of law and Economics 17(1) : 53–71.10.1086/466784Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven. 1983. “The Contractual Nature of the Firm,” The Journal of Law and Economics 26(1): 1–21.10.1086/467023Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven. 1970. “The Structure of a Contract and the Theory of a Non-Exclusive Resource,” Journal of Law and Economics 13(1): 49–70.10.1086/466683Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven. 1969. The Theory of Share Tenancy. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven. 1986.Will China Go Capitalist? 2nd Revised edition. (Hobart Papers) Institute of Economic Affairs.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Steven. 2014. Choice of Institution, Economic Explanation (Volume 4). Beijing: Citic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” The Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.10.1086/466560Search in Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1964. “The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights,” The Journal of Law and Economics 11–25.10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_6Search in Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review57(2):347–359.10.1057/9780230523210_9Search in Google Scholar
DU Rensheng. 2005. Du Runsheng Talks about Significant Policy-making in China’s Rural Reform. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert, and Engerman, Stanley. 1989. Time on the Cross. New York and London: W.W. Norton Company.Search in Google Scholar
Gao Wangling. 2013. A Research of Anti-Behavior of Chinese Farmers (1950~1980). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lawson, F.H., and Rudden, Bernard. 2002. The Law of Property. Rossendale: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299936.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
North, Douglass and Thomas, Robert. 1971. “The Rise and Fall of the Manorial System: A Theoretical Model,” Journal of Economic History 31(December):777–803.10.1017/S0022050700074623Search in Google Scholar
North, Douglass. 1982. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar
Shen Han. 2005. History of British Land Institution. Shanghai: Academia Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sheng Hong. 2003. “A Story about Price Reform and A General Transitional Economic Theory Inspired by It,” Management World (5):21–28.Search in Google Scholar
Sheng Hong. 1991. “Seeking for a Stable Way of Reform,” Economic Research (11):36–43.Search in Google Scholar
Sheng Hong. 1995. “Transaction of Foreign Exchange Quota: A Case of Planned Rights Transaction,” Quarterly Journal of Social Science of China, (13),Search in Google Scholar
Xian Hongchang. 2009. History of British Land Laws. Beijing: Peking University Press.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Articles
- Steven N.S. Cheung’s Reminiscence of Himself – A Reply to Ning Wang
- China’s Challenge: Expanding the Market, Limiting the State
- Steve Cheung in Seattle, 1969–1982
- Steve Cheung as Teacher
- Steven Cheung at Chicago, 1968
- Seeing Things with Your Own Eyes: Steven Cheung’s Example for Economists
- Steven Cheung and Coasian Economics: A Personal Reflection
- Cheung, Becker and Marriage
- Economic Explanation: From Sharecropping to the Sharing Economy
- The Assembly of Rents
- Contract Matters: An Explanation of China’s Recent Economic History
- The Contractual Nature of the City
- Wisdom of the Past
- Benjamin Constant on Law and Government
- Market for ideas
- On Human and Natural Economies Interview Geerat J. Vermeij, by Grégoire Canlorbe
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Articles
- Steven N.S. Cheung’s Reminiscence of Himself – A Reply to Ning Wang
- China’s Challenge: Expanding the Market, Limiting the State
- Steve Cheung in Seattle, 1969–1982
- Steve Cheung as Teacher
- Steven Cheung at Chicago, 1968
- Seeing Things with Your Own Eyes: Steven Cheung’s Example for Economists
- Steven Cheung and Coasian Economics: A Personal Reflection
- Cheung, Becker and Marriage
- Economic Explanation: From Sharecropping to the Sharing Economy
- The Assembly of Rents
- Contract Matters: An Explanation of China’s Recent Economic History
- The Contractual Nature of the City
- Wisdom of the Past
- Benjamin Constant on Law and Government
- Market for ideas
- On Human and Natural Economies Interview Geerat J. Vermeij, by Grégoire Canlorbe