Home Social Sciences The marketization of higher education in China: a comparative multimodal genre analysis between top-public and international universities
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The marketization of higher education in China: a comparative multimodal genre analysis between top-public and international universities

  • Yuxuan Mu ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Luoxiangyu Zhang ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: July 25, 2025

Abstract

With the growing marketization of higher education in China, the About-us webpage of universities has become an important venue for academic institutions to display both introductory information and self-promotional content to attract prospective students. This study draws on multimodal genre analysis to examine and compare the generic structure of the About-us webpages of two academic associations: C9 universities (nine public, top-tier universities) and Sino-foreign cooperative (or international) universities. We analyze how these two groups of universities structure their webpages differently across three layers: layout, rhetorical, and navigational features. The findings suggest that both groups employ rhetorical moves, such as providing an overview of the university and establishing academic credentials. However, C9 universities narrate their histories and political affiliation, while Sino-foreign universities elaborate on their international-oriented education through the massive use of multimodal resources. This study contributes to the framework of multimodal genre analysis, demonstrating how Chinese academic institutions strategically mobilize linguistic and visual resources to engage with Chinese sociopolitical discourses.


Corresponding author: Yuxuan Mu, Department of World Languages, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA, E-mail:

Appendix: Overview of C9 and international universities

University Name (Abbreviation) Year Type
Xi’an Jiaotong University (XJTU) 1896 C9
Shanghai Jiaotong University (SJTU) 1896 C9
Zhejiang University (ZJU) 1897 C9
Peking University (PKU) 1898 C9
Nanjing University (NJU) 1902 C9
Fudan University (FDU) 1905 C9
Tsinghua University (THU) 1911 C9
Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT) 1920 C9
University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) 1958 C9
University of Nottingham Ningbo (UNNC) 2004 International
BNU-HKBU United International College (UIC) 2005 International
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU) 2006 International
Wenzhou-Kean University (WKU) 2011 International
New York University Shanghai (NYU) 2012 International
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHK) 2012 International
Duke Kunshan University (KDU) 2013 International
Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology (GTIIT) 2015 International
Shenzhen MSU-BIT University (SMBU) 2016 International

References

Bateman, John. 2008. Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230582323_5Search in Google Scholar

Bhatia, Vijay K. 2016. Critical genre analysis: Investigating interdiscursive performance in professional practice. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Brenner, Neil, Jamie Peck & Nik Theodore. 2010. Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 10(2). 182–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x.Search in Google Scholar

China Academic Degrees and Graduate Education Development Center (CDGDC). n.d. Homepage. https://www.cdgdc.edu.cn/zwhz/ (Accessed 10 June 2025).Search in Google Scholar

Codó, Eva & Andrea Sunyol. 2019. ‘A plus for our students’: The construction of Mandarin Chinese as an elite language in an international school in Barcelona. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40(5). 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1543694.Search in Google Scholar

CUAA. 2024. Chinese universities ranking. cauu.net (Accessed 29 March 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Noman. 1993. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society 4(2). 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 2001. Language and power. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. 2023. Technologization of discourse. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and practices revised, 27–43. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003272847-3Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Dezheng. 2019. Interdiscursivity, social media and marketized university discourse: A genre analysis of universities’ recruitment posts on WeChat. Journal of Pragmatics 143. 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.007.Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Dezheng. 2023. Multimodal Chinese discourse: Understanding communication and society in contemporary China. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003130659Search in Google Scholar

FlorCruz, Maria. 2013. China’s diploma mills: Report reveals 100 fake universities. International Business. 29 June https://www.ibtimes.com/chinas-diploma-mills-report-reveals-100-fake-universities-1328373 (Accessed 10 February 2025).Search in Google Scholar

Han, Zhengrui. 2014. The marketization of public discourse: The Chinese universities. Discourse & Communication 8(1). 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313503221.Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, David. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hiippala, Tuomo. 2017. An overview of research within the Genre and Multimodality framework. Discourse, Context & Media 20. 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2020. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 3rd. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003099857Search in Google Scholar

Luo, Yadong & Ari Van Assche. 2023. The rise of techno-geopolitical uncertainty: Implications of the United States CHIPS and Science Act. Joural of International Business Studies 54. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-023-00620-3.Search in Google Scholar

Machin, David & Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. London: SAGE Open.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Education. 2001. Several Opinions on Launching the Work of Building World-Class Universities and High-Level Universities. Beijing: Ministry of Education of the PRC. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/gk_gbgg/moe_0/moe_7/moe_445/tnull_5941.html (accessed 21 July 2025).Search in Google Scholar

Mok, Ka Ho. 2008. The growing importance of the privateness in education: Challenges for higher education governance in China. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 39(1). 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920801951851.Search in Google Scholar

Mok, Ka Ho. 2015. Higher education transformations for global competitiveness: Policy responses, social consequences and impact on the academic profession in Asia. Higher Education Policy 28(1). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.27.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 2004. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Multimodality, genre, and design. In Jones Rodney & Srigd Norris (eds.), Discourse in action, 73–93. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203018767-12Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Zheng. 2014. The Chinese dream: Concept and context. Journal of Chinese Political Science 19(1). 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-013-9272-0.Search in Google Scholar

Xie, Chaoqun & Peter Teo. 2020. Institutional self-promotion: A comparative study of appraisal resources used by top- and second-tier universities in China and America. Higher Education 80(2). 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00483-4.Search in Google Scholar

Xiong, Tao. 2012. Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts. Discourse & Society 23(3). 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511433786.Search in Google Scholar

Xiong, Tao & Qiuna Li. 2020. Interdiscursivity and promotional discourse: A corpus-assisted genre analysis of about us texts on Chinese university websites. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 43(4). 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2020-0027.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Tongtong. 2017. The marketization of higher education discourse: A genre analysis of university website homepages in China. Higher Education Studies 7(3). 64–79. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n3p64.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yaqiong & Kay L. O’Halloran. 2012. The gate of the gateway: A hypermodal approach to university homepages. Semiotica 190. 87–109.10.1515/sem-2012-0041Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yaqiong & Kay L. O’Halloran. 2013. Toward a global knowledge enterprise’: University websites as portals to the ongoing marketization of higher education. Critical Discourse Studies 10(4). 468–489.10.1080/17405904.2013.813777Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Zuochen, Sabine Tan, Peter Wignell & Kay L. O’Halloran. 2020. Addressing international students on Australian and Chinese university webpages: A comparative study. Discourse, Context and Media 36. 100403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100403.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-02-22
Accepted: 2025-06-25
Published Online: 2025-07-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2025-0008/html
Scroll to top button