Use of inscribed objects in roleplay training sessions at a Japanese insurance company

References

Atkins, S. 2019. Assessing health professionals’ communication through role-play: An interactional analysis of simulated versus actual general practice consultations. Discourse Studies 21(2). 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618802659.Search in Google Scholar

Burch, A. R. & G. Kasper. 2021. Task instruction in OPI roleplays. In M. R. Salaberry & A. R. Burch (eds.), Assessing speaking in context: Expanding the construct and its applications, 73–106. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.22730474.7Search in Google Scholar

Cook, H. M. 1992. Meanings of non‑referential indexes: A case study of the Japanese sentence‑final particle ne. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 12(4). 507–539. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1992.12.4.507.Search in Google Scholar

Crookall, D. & D. Saunders (eds.). 1989. Communication and simulation: From two fields to one theme, 4. Bristol: Multilingual matters.Search in Google Scholar

Day, D. & K. Mortensen. 2017. Inscribed objects in professional practices: An introduction. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice 14(2). 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.40427.Search in Google Scholar

Day, D. & J. Wagner. 2014. Objects as tools for talk. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann & M. Rauniomaa (eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, 101–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186.05daySearch in Google Scholar

De la Croix, A. & J. Skelton. 2013. The simulation game: An analysis of interactions between students and simulated patients. Medical Education 47(1). 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12064.Search in Google Scholar

Deppermann, A., R. Schmitt & L. Mondada. 2010. Agenda and emergence: Contingent and planned activities in a meeting. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6). 1700–1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006.Search in Google Scholar

Dolata, M. & G. Schwabe. 2017. Paper practices in institutional talk: How financial advisors impress their clients. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26(4). 769–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9279-8.Search in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Manhattan: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E. 1981. Footing. In E. Goffman (ed.), Forms of talk, 124–159. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(10). 1489–1522.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-XSearch in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. 2007. Environmentally coupled gestures. Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell & E. T. Levy (eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill, 1, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/gs.1.18gooSearch in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. 2013. The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1). 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Hamann, M. G. 2020. Using written information to answer questions in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 14(2). 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.33620.Search in Google Scholar

Hazel, S. & K. Mortensen. 2014. Embodying the institution – Object manipulation in developing interaction in study counselling meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 65. 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.016.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, J. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020Search in Google Scholar

Hindmarsh, J. & C. Heath. 2000. Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32(12). 1855–1878.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00122-8Search in Google Scholar

Huth, T. 2010. Can talk be inconsequential? Social and interactional aspects of elicited second language interaction. The Modern Language Journal 94(4). 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01092.x.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. 1984. On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.021Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (ed.), Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 125, 13–31. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Kamio, A. 1994. The theory of territory of information: The case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21(1). 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90047-7.Search in Google Scholar

Kasper, G. & S. J. Youn. 2018. Transforming instruction to activity: Roleplay in language assessment. Applied Linguistics Review 9(4). 589–616. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0020.Search in Google Scholar

Lamb, G. 2016. Smiling together, laughing together. In M. T. Prior & G. Kasper (eds.), Emotion in multilingual interaction, 29–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.266.02lamSearch in Google Scholar

Linell, P. & D. P. Thunqvist. 2003. Moving in and out of framings: Activity contexts in talks with young unemployed people within a training project. Journal of Pragmatics 35(3). 409–434.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00143-1Search in Google Scholar

Monteiro, D. 2021. Presenting documents to clients in social work encounters. Calidoscópio 19(2). 224–242. https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2021.192.05.Search in Google Scholar

Mikkola, P. & E. Lehtinen. 2014. Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann & M. Rauniomaa (eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, 57–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186.03mikSearch in Google Scholar

Mondada, L. 2009. Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics 41(10). 1977–1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.019.Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, L. 2018. Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1). 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.Search in Google Scholar

Mori, J. & Y. Matsunaga. 2017. Becoming a conversationalist at the dinner table: Topic management practices by a JFL student living in foreign language housing. In T. Greer, M. Ishida & Y. Tateyama (eds.), Interactional competence in Japanese as an additional language, 175–210. Hawaii: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, H. T. 2018. Interactional practices across settings: From classroom role-plays to workplace patient consultations. Applied Linguistics 39(2). 213–235.Search in Google Scholar

Okada. 2010. Role-play in oral proficiency interviews: Interactive footing and interactional competencies. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6). 1647–1668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

Okada, Y. & T. Greer. 2013. Pursuing a relevant response in oral proficiency interview role plays. In M. R. Salaberry & S. E. Cohen (eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics, 288–310. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137003522_11Search in Google Scholar

Pilnick, A., D. Trusson, S. Beeke, R. O’Brien, S. Goldberg & R. H. Harwood. 2018. Using conversation analysis to inform role play and simulated interaction in communications skills training for healthcare professionals: Identifying avenues for further development through a scoping review. BMC Medical Education 18(1). 267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1381-1.Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, G. & G. H. Lerner. 2014. A body and its involvements. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada & M. Nevile (eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking, 227–246. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.187.08raySearch in Google Scholar

Robinson, J. D. & T. Stivers. 2001. Achieving activity transitions in physician–patient encounters: From history taking to physical examination. Human Communication Research 27(2). 253–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00782.x.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, H. 1992. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on conversation, I & II. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. 1980. Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”. Sociological Inquiry 50(3-4). 104–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1980.tb00018.x.Search in Google Scholar

Sharrock, W. W. & D. R. Watson. 1985. Reality construction’ in L2 simulations. System 13(3). 195–206.10.1016/0346-251X(85)90033-8Search in Google Scholar

Stokoe, E. 2013. The (in) authenticity of simulated talk: Comparing role-played and actual interaction and the implications for communication training. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(2). 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.780341.Search in Google Scholar

Tanaka, H. 2013. The Japanese response token Hee for registering the achievement of epistemic coherence. Journal of Pragmatics 55. 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Tuccio, W. A. & M. Nevile. 2017. Using conversation analysis in data-driven aviation training with large-scale qualitative datasets. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research 26(1). 1–47. https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.2017.1706.Search in Google Scholar

Wadensjö, C. 2014. Perspectives on role play: Analysis, training and assessments. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 8(3). 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399x.2014.971486.Search in Google Scholar

Watson, D. R. 1978. Categorization, authorization and blame-negotiation in conversation. Sociology 12(1). 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200106.Search in Google Scholar

Weilenmann, A. & G. Lymer. 2014. Incidental and essential objects in interaction: Paper documents in journalistic work. In M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann & M. Rauniomaa (eds.), Interacting with objects, 319–338. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.186.14weiSearch in Google Scholar