Home Fuzzy ideals of ordered semigroups with fuzzy orderings
Article Open Access

Fuzzy ideals of ordered semigroups with fuzzy orderings

  • Xiaokun Huang and Qingguo Li EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 14, 2016

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the notions of ∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup with the ordering being a fuzzy relation. Several characterizations of ∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left (resp. right) ideals and ∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy interior ideals are derived. The lattice structures of all ∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy (interior) ideals on such fuzzy ordered semigroup are studied and some methods are given to construct an ∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy (interior) ideals from an arbitrary fuzzy subset. Finally, the characterizations of generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroups in terms of ∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy ideals (resp. ∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy interior ideals) are developed.

MSC 2010: 03E72; 06F05; 08A72

1 Introduction

Based on Zadeh’s fuzzy set theory, the study of fuzzy algebraic structures has started in the pioneering paper of Rosenfeld [1] in 1971. Rosenfeld [1] introduced the notion of fuzzy groups and showed that many results in groups can be extended in an elementary manner to develop the theory of fuzzy group. Since then the literature of various fuzzy algebraic concepts has been growing very rapidly. Using the notion “belongingness (∈)” and “quasi-coincidence (q)” of a fuzzy point with a fuzzy set proposed by Pu and Liu [2], the concept of (α, β)-fuzzy subgroups, where α, β are any two of {∈,q, ∈ ∨q, ∈ ∧q} with α ≠∈∧q, was introduced by Bhakat and Das [3] in 1992. Particularly, it was pointed out in the same paper that (∈, ∈ ∨q)-fuzzy subgroup is an important and useful generalization of Rosenfeld’s fuzzy subgroup. After that, these generalizations have been extended to other algebraic structures by many researchers, for example, Davvaz [4], Jun and Song [5], Kazancl and Yamak [6], Khan and Shabir [7], Yin et al. [8], Zhan and Yin [9], Davvaz and Khan [10], etc. As a generalization of the quasi-coincident relation (q) of a fuzzy point with a fuzzy subset, Jun [11] defined (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy subalgebras in BCK/BCI-algebras. In [12] (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy h-ideals and (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy k-ideals of a hemiring are defined and discussed. Shabir et al. [13] characterized different classes of semigroups by the properties of their (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy ideals and (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy bi-ideals.

By an ordered semigroup we mean a semigroup together with a partial order that is compatible with the semigroup operation. Since ordered semigroup has a close relation with theoretical computer science, especially with the theory of sequential machines, formal languages, computer arithmetics, and error-correcting codes, it has been extensively investigated by many researchers (see e.g. [1422]). On the other hand, the concept of fuzzy orderings was introduced and investigated at the very beginning by Zadeh [23]. The motivation for Zadeh [23] to do this research was that the crisp partial orders are useful tools for modeling various situations in which different kinds of comparison appear, while fuzzy partial orders are more sensitive than their crisp counterparts. During the past 10 years, many authors investigated fuzzy orders with their applications to various branches of mathematics and computer sciences. Some examples are as follows. Zhang et al. [24, 25] analysed the properties of fuzzy domains and fuzzy complete lattices. Lai [26], Yao [27] and Hao [28] investigated the relationships between fuzzy orders and fuzzy topological spaces. Based on fuzzy posets, Yao et al. [29, 30] studied the fuzzy Scott topologies and fuzzy Galois connections. Since ordered semigroups and fuzzy orderings both have applications across a wide variety of fields, researchers turn to consider the combination of these two concepts. In [31], Hao defined fuzzy ordered semigroups based on fuzzy partial orders and studied their representation by sets. After that, Wang [32] solved the problem of embedding such a fuzzy ordered semigroup into a fuzzy quantales.

In this paper, the method of (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy generalization is applied to fuzzy ordered semigroups in which the orderings are fuzzy relations. We introduce the concepts of (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy ideals and (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup and present several characteristic theorems of them. We describe the (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy ideals and (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideals generated by a fuzzy subset and the structures of all (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy (interior) ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup. In order to exhibit some applications of (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy (interior) ideals, we investigate the characterizations of generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroup by the properties of (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy (interior) ideals.

2 Basic definitions and results

Recall that an ordered semigroup is a partially ordered set S, with an associative multiplication “.” which is compatible with the ordering, i.e., for any x,y,zS,xy implies xzyz and zxzy.

For two subsets A, B of S, we denote (A]={tS:th,for somehA} and AB={ab:aA,bB}. A nonempty subset A of S is called a left (resp. right) ideal of S if: 1SAA(resp.ASA)and(2)baA implies bA. An ideal of S is a non-empty subset which is both a left and right ideal of S. A nonempty subset A of an ordered semigroup S is called an interior ideal of S if: (1)SASA,(2)AAAand(3)baA implies bA.

Let X be a nonempty set. An arbitrary mapping f:X[0,1] is called a fuzzy subset of X and the symbol F(X) denotes the set of all fuzzy subsets of X. For α(0,1]andAX, the fuzzy subset αA is defined by αA(x)=αifxAandαA(x)=0 otherwise. In particular, when α=1,αA is said to be the characteristic function of A, denoted by fA;whenA={x},αA is said to be afuzzy point with support x and value α and denoted by xα.

A fuzzy point xα. is said to belong to (resp. be quasi-coincident with) a fuzzy subset f, denoted as xαf(resp.xαqf),iff(x)α(resp.f(x)+α>1). In [11], Jun generalized the concept of xαqfasxαqkfiff(x)+α+k>1, where k[0,1).Ifxαforxαqkf, then we write xαqkf. By the symbol xα¯f we mean that xαf does not hold, where {,qk,qk}.

Now, using the above notions, we define an ordering “⊆ ∨qk” on F(X). Let f,gF(X). If for any fuzzy point xαonX,xαfimpliesxαqkg, then we write fqkg.

Lemma 2.1

Letf,gF(X).fqkgifandonlyifg(x)f(x)1k2forallxX.

Proof

Let fqkg and x be an element of X. If possible, let g(x)<f(x)1k2. Then there exists a real number α such that g(x)<α<f(x)1k2 which yields that xαfbutxαqk¯g, a contradiction. Thus g(x)f(x)1k2forallxX.

Conversely, assume that g(x)f(x)1k2forallxX.Letxα be any fuzzy point such that xαf. Then g(x)f(x)1k2α1k2.Ifα1k2,theng(x)α,i.e.,xαg.Ifα1k2,theng(x)1k2, which implies g(x)+α>1k2+1k2=1k, and hence xαqkg. Thus, in both cases we always have xαqkg. Therefore, fqkg.

The following lemma can be obtained directly from Lemma 2.1.

Lemma 2.2

Letf,g,hF(X).Then

(1) fqkf.

(2) fqkgandgqkhimplyfqkh.

It is natural to ask wether fqkgandgqkfimplyf=g. The following example gives a negative answer to this question.

Example 2.3

Let f and g be twofuzzy subsets of a setX=a,b,csuchthatfa=0.6,fb=0.6,fc=0.5andga=0.5,gb=0.5,gc=0.6.Then, for anyk[0,1),wehavefqkgandgqkf,butfg.

Let f, g ∈ F(X). We define a relation on F(X) as follows. If fqkgandgqkf,then we writefkg. It follows from Lemma 2.2 that ≡ k is an equivalence relation on F(X).

Definition 2.4

([24, 34 Assume thatXis a nonempty set. A fuzzy relatione : X×X[0,1]onXis called an fuzzy partial order iffor any x, y, z ∈ X,

(1) (Reflexivity) e(x, x) = 1;

(2) (Transitivity) e(x,y)e(y,z)e(x,z);

(3) (Anti-symmetry) e(x,y)=e(y,x)=1impliesx=y.

A nonempty set X equipped with a fuzzy partial order is called afuzzy partially ordered set, or shortly afuzzy poset.

Definition 2.5

Definition 2.5 ([31, 32]). A fuzzy ordered semigroup is a triple (S, e ⋅)consisting of a nonempty setStogether witha fuzzy relationeand a binary operationsonSsuch that

(1) (S, e) is a fuzzy poset;

(2) (S, ·)is a semigroups;

(3) e(x,y)e(zx,zy)ande(x,y)e(xz,yz)forallx,y,zS.

A fuzzy ordered semigroup (S, e, ⋅) is said to be commutative if x ⋅ y = y ⋅ x for all x, y ∈ S. By the identity of S we mean an element I ∈ S such that x ⋅ I = I ⋅ x = x for all x ∈ S. In what follows, for the sake of simplicity, we shall write xy instead of x ⋅ y, for any x, y ∈ S.

Example 2.6

LetSbe a nonempty set, ⩽ bea binary relation onS and ⋅ be a binary operation on S. Forα[0,1),we define a fuzzy relatione⩽ on Sas follows: (x,y)S×S,

e(x,y)=1,xyα,otherwise
then(S, e ⩽,⋅)is a fuzzy ordered semigroup if and only if(S, e ⩽,⋅)is a crisp ordered semigroup.

In the sequel, the symbol θ denotes the Godel implication on [0, 1], i.e., θ(r,t)=1,rtt,r>t,r,t0,1 (see [33]). Then, a binary operation on F(S), which is induced directly by θ, can be defined by θ(f,g)(x)=θ(f(x),g(x))foranyf,gF(S)andxS.

Example 2.7

Define a fuzzy relatione : [0,1]×[0,1][0,1]by(x,y[0,1],e(x,y)=θ(x,y))and a binaryoperation . : [0,1]×[0,1][0,1]by(x,y[0,1],xy=xy).Then([0, 1], e, ⋅)is a commutative fuzzyordered semigroup with the identity 1.

Definition 2.8

([31]). Let(S, e·)be a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S).Thenfis called a fuzzy left (resp. right) ideal ofSif the following conditions hold: (1) f(y)f(x)e(y,x)foranyx,yS; (2) f(xy)f(y)(resp.f(xy)f(x))foranyx,yS.

By a fuzzy ideal, we mean the one which is both a fuzzy left and fuzzy right ideal.

Let (S,e,୵) be a fuzzy ordered semigroup. We define a unary operation and a binary operation (·] on F(S), respectively, as follows: f,gF(S),xS,

(1) (f](x)=yXe(x,y)f(y).

(2) (feg)(x)=(y,z)S×Sf(y)e(x,yz)g(z)

Particularly, for an element x of S, we shall write (x] instead of f{x}]. It is clear that

(x](y)=zXe(y,z)f{x}(z)=e(y,x)

In addition, if ( f] = f, then f is called afuzzy lower set (See [24, 34]).

Remark 2.9

Let (S,e,୵) be a fuzzy ordered semigroup. Then

(1) ∘eis associative onF(S), that is, (foeg)oeh=foe(goeh)for anyf,g,h∈F(S).

(2) IfSis a commutative fuzzy ordered semigroup, theneis commutative onF(S), that is, foeg=goefforanyf,g, ∈ F(S).

Finally, we develop some basic properties of the multiplication ∘e. We will omit the proofs because they are trivial.

Proposition 2.10

Let (S,e,୵) be a fuzzy ordered semigroup andf,g,hiF(S), iI. Then

(1) (foeg]=foeg.

(2) foe(ihi)=ifoehi,(ihi)oef=ihioef.

(3) foe(ihi)ifoehi,(ihi)oefihioef.

The item (1) in above proposition indicates that for any f;gF(S),foeg is a fuzzy lower set, and the item (2) shows that ∘>e is distributive over arbitrary unions.

Proposition 2.11

Let (S,e,୵) be a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfi;giF(S)(i=1,2)such thatf1qkf2andg1qkg2.

(1) f1g1qkf2g2.

(2) f1g1qkf2g2.

(3) f1oeg1qkf2oeg2.

Proposition 2.12

Let (S,e,୵) be a fuzzy ordered semigroup andA,BS.Then

(1) ABifandonlyiffAqkfB.

(2) fAfB=fABandfAfB=fAB.

(3) fAefB=(fAB].

3 (∈, ∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy left (resp. right) ideals

To avoid repetitions, from now $S$ will always mean a fuzzy ordered semigroup (S,e,୵)

Definition 3.1

A fuzzy subset $f$ of a fuzzy ordered semigroupSis called an (∈, ∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy left (resp. right) idealofSiffor anyx, y ∈ Sand α ∈ (0,1)], the following conditions hold.

(F1a) xαfyαqkθ(x],f.

(F2a) ySandxαfyxαqkfresp.xyαqkf.

A fuzzy subset $f$ of $S$ is called an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy ideal if it is both an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideal and (∈, ∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy right ideal of $S$. We note that, whenever a statement is made about (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideals, analogous statement holds for (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy right ideals.

In what follows, we develop some characterizations of (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup.

Proposition 3.2

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S). Thenfis an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal ofSif and only if

(Flb) f(y)f(x)e(y,x)1k2foranyx,yS;

(F2b) f(xy)f(y)1k2foranyx,yS.

Proof

(⟹) Let f be an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S. If f(y)<f(x)e(y,x)1k2for somex,yS, then there exists α[0,1]such thatf(y)<α<f(x)e(y,x)1k2. Then it follows that xαf. Meanwhile, since f(y)<e(y,x),wehaveθ((x],f)(y)=θ(e(y,x),f(y))=f(y). This yields the following two assertions.

(i) yα¯θ((x],f).Indeed,sinceθ((x],f)(y)=f(y)<α,wehaveyα¯θ((x]cf).

(ii) yαqk¯θ((x],f). In fact, a routine calculation implies that θ((x],f)(y)+α+k=f(y)+α+k<1k2+1k2+k=1, thus we have yαqk¯θ((x],f).

Hence, yαqk¯θ((x],f), which contradicts to (Fla). Therefore f(y)f(x)e(y,x)1k2 for any x,yS. In a similar way, we can prove that f(x,y)f(y)1k2for anyx,yS.

(⟸) Suppose that (Flb) and (F2b) hold. Let x,ySx,yS and α ∈ (0,1] be such that xαf. Then f(x)α. By condition (Flb), we have f(y)αe(y,x)1k2.Ifαe(y,x)>1k2,thenf(y)1k2, which implies θ((x],f)(y)+α+k=θ(e(y,x),f(y))+α+kf(y)+α+k>1,and thenyαqkθ((x],f). If αe(y,x)1k2,thenf(y)f(x)e(y,x),it derivesf(y)f(x)orf(y)e(y,x).Sincef(y)f(x) implies θ((x],f)(y)=θ(e(y,x),f(y))f(y)f(x)αandf(y)e(y,x)impliesθ((x],f)(y)=1α, we always have yαθ((x],f).Henceyαqkθ((x],f). This means that (Fla) holds. Similarly, we can prove that (F2a) holds.

Note that every fuzzy left (resp. right) ideal of S according to Definition 2.8 is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left (resp. right) ideal of S. However, the following example reveals that an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left (resp. right) ideal is not necessarily a fuzzy left (resp. right) ideal.

Example 3.3

Consider the fuzzy ordered semigroupS = {a,b,c}, where fuzzy ordereand multiplication · are defined respectively as follows:

Letfbe a fuzzy subsets ofSsuch that

f=0.6a+0.8b+0.2c

Put $k=0.4$. Then it is easy to veri thatfis an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal ofS, but not a fuzzy left ideal of S because f(ab) = f(a) = 0.6 < 0.8 = f(b).

Proposition 3.4

Let(S,e,·)be a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S) . Thenfis an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left idealofSif and only iffor eachα[0,1k2],fαis either empty or a left ideal of the ordered semigroup(S,α;)wherefα={xS:f(x)α}andα={(x,y)S×S:e(x,y)α}.

Proof

(⟹) Let α[0,1k2] Then it is easy to check that (S,α;) is an ordered semigroup. Now, if fα ≠ ⊘, we show that fα is aleft ideal of (S,α;). Let x, yS be such that yαxandxfα,thene(y,x)αandf(x)α. Since f is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal, it follows from Proposition 3.2 that f(y)f(x)e(y,x)1k2α, which implies yfα.Next, letxSandyfα. Then f(xy)f(y)1k2α is a left ideal of (S,α;).

(⟸) For x,yS, set α=f(x)e(y,x)1k2,thenα[0,1k2] and fα is nonempty. By the assumption, fα is a left ideal of (S,α;). Since yαxandxfα,We have yf_α, which implies that f(y)α=f(x)e(y,x)1k2. Similarly, we have f(xy)f(y)1k2by settingα=f(y)1k2. Therefore, by Proposition 3.2, f is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of (S, e, ·).

Proposition 3.5

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S) . Thenfis an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideal ofSif and only if

(F1C)(f]qkf;

(F2(C)) fSefqkf.

Proof

(⟹) Let f be an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S and xS. Then, by Proposition 3.2, we have (f](x)1k2=ySe(x,y)f(y)1k2f(x)and(fSef)(x)1k2=(y,Z)S×Sex,yzf(z)1k2(y,z)S×Sex,yzf(yz)1k2fx. It follows from Lemma 2.1 that (f]qkf; and fSefqkf, i.e., (Flc) and (F2c) hold.

(⟸) Assume that (Flc) and (F2c) hold. If possible, let f(y)<f(x)e(y,x)1k2 for some x,yS. Then there exists a real number α such that f(y)<α<f(x)e(y,x)1k2, which implies yα(f],yα¯f and yαqk¯f, a contradiction to (Flc). Therefore, the condition (Flb) holds. Similarly, we can prove that (F2b) is valid.

Let (S,e,#183;) be a fuzzy ordered semigroup and xS. Recall from Section 2 that the fuzzy subset (x] is defined by (x](y)=e(y,x) for all yS. Now we generalize it as follows. For any xS and α ∈ (0,1], U(x;α) is a fuzzy subset of S defined by U(x;α)(y)=αe(y,x) for all yS. One may easily observe that U(x;1) = (x] and xαU(x;α).

Proposition 3.6

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S) . Thenfis an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideal ofSif and only iffor anyx,ySand α ∈ (0,1], the following conditions hold.

(F1d)xαfU(x;α)qkf;

(F2d) yS,xαfU(yx;α)qkf.

Proof

(⟸) Let f be an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S and let x, yS and α∈(0,1] be such that xαf. Then f(x) ⩾ α. By Proposition 3.2, we have f(y)f(x)e(y,x)1k2αe(y,x)1k2=U(x;α)(y)1k2. Thus Lemma 2.1 implies that U(x;α)qkf, and hence (Fld) holds. Moreover, for any zS, we have f(z)f(yx)e(z,yx)1k2f(x)e(z,yx)1k2αe(z,yx)1k2=U(yx;α)(z)1k2. Thus U(yx;α)qkf. So (F2d)$ holds.

(⟸) Assume that (F1d) and (F2d) hold. Let x,yS and set α=f(x)e(y,x)1k2 Then xαf. By the assumption, we have U(x;α)qkf, which implies f(y)U(x;α)(y)1k2=αe(y,x)1k2=f(x)e(y,x)1k2 Next, we set α=f(x)1k2 Then (F2d) implies U(yx;α)qkf. Thus we have f(yx)U(yx;α)(yx)1k2=αe(yx,yx)1k2=α1k2=f(x)1k2. Therefore, by Proposition 3.2, f is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S.

In the following, we intend to construct an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal from an arbtrary fuzzy subset of a fuzzy ordered semigroup.

Proposition 3.7

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S). Then(1k2)sefis an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzyleft ideal ofS.

Straightforward by Propositions 2.10 and 3.5.

Theorem 3.8

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S) . Put

f(x)=α[0,1]|(α1k2;x[fα]α)or(α>1k2;xfα)
for anyxS. Thenfis the least (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal ofSthat containsf. Where, for any subsetAofS, [A]αis the left ideal of the ordered semigroup(S,α;)generated byA, i.e., [A]α={xS|xαyforsomeyASA}.
Proof

We will complete the proof by three steps.

Step 1: 〈f〉 is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S. For any x,yS, define two sets

A1={αe(y,x)(1k2)|α[0,1],(α1k2;x[fα]α)or(α>1k20xfα)};A2={β|β[0,1],(β1k2;y[fβ]β)or(β>1k2;yfβ)}.

Let γ=αe(y,x)(1k2)A1 Then α1k2;x[fα]αorα>1k2;xfα.Ifα1k2,x[fα]α, then γ[0,1k2],andγαyieldsx[fα]α[fγ]γ. If α>1k2;xfα,thenγ[0,1k2]andxfαfγ[fγ]γ. So, in both cases, we always have γ[0,1k2]andx[fγ]γ. Since e(y,x)γ, we have y[fγ]γ Thus γA2. This proves that A1A2. Thus, f(y)A2A1=f(x)e(y,x)1k2. In a similar way, we can prove that f(xy)f(y)1k2 for any x,yS. Therefore, 〈f〉 is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S.

Step 2: f{f}. For any xS, since fα[fα]α for every α ∈[0,1], we have

f(x)=α[0,1]|xfα={α[0,1]|(α1k2,xfα)or(α>1k2,xfα)}{α[0,1]|(α1k2,x[fα]α)or(α>1k2,xfα)}=f(x).

This implies f ⊆ 〈f〉, as required.

Step 3: 〈f〉 ⊆ g for any (∈,∈ ∨ qk-fuzzy left ideal g of S with fg. For any α[0,1k2] it follows from Proposition 3.4 that gα is either empty or a left ideal of the ordered semigroup (S,⩽α In both cases, we always have gα = [gα]α. Thus, for any xS, we have

1f(x)={α[0,1]|(α1k2,x[fα]α)or(α>1k2,xfα)}{α[0,1]|(α1k2,x[gα]α)or(α>1k2,xgα)}={α[0,1]|(α1k2,xgα)or(α>1k2,xgα)}={α[0,1]|xgα}=g(x).

This implies that 〈f〉 ⊆ g.

Naturally, we can consider the greatest (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of a fuzzy ordered semigroup contained in a fuzzy set. For this, we have the following result.

Theorem 3.9

Letfbe any fuzzy subset of S. Then

i(f)(x)={α[0,1]|U(x;α)qkf,U(ax;α)qkf(aS)}
is the greatest (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal ofScontained (under the relation ⊆ ∨ qkinf.
Proof

For x,yS, define

B1={αe(y,x)(1k2)|α[0,1],U(x;α)qkf,U(ax;α)qkf(aSB2={α[0,1]|U(y;α)qkf,U(by;α)qkf(bSB3={α(1k2)|α[0,1],U(x;α)qkf,U(cx;α)qkf(cS

Now, we split the proof into three parts as follows.

(i) i(f) is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S. For any γ=αe(y,x)(1k2)B1, we have U(x;α)qkf,U(ax;α)qkf(aS). Thus, for any zS,f(z)U(x;α)(z)(1k2)=αe(z,x)(1k2)αe(z,y)e(y,x)(1k2)=U(y;αe(y,x)(1k2))(z)(1k2)=U(y;γ)(z)(1k2)andf(z)Uax;αz1k2=αez,ax1k2αez,ayeay,ax1k2αez,ayey,x(1k2)=U(ay,αe(y,x)(1k2)(z)(1k2)=U(ay,γ)(z)(1k2),aS, which implies Uy;γqkf,Uay,yqkf,aS. Thus γB2. This proves that B1B2 and hence i(f)(y)=B2B1=i(f)(x)e(y,x)1k2. In a similar way, we can prove i(f)(xy)i(f)(y)1k2. Therefore, i(f) is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S.

(ii) i(f)qkf For any γ=α(1k2)B3, we have U(x;α)qkf. Combining Lemma 2.1, we get that f(x)U(x;α)(x)(1k2)=α(1k2)=γ. Since γ is an arbitrary element of B3, we have f(x)B3=i(f)(x)(1k2), i.e.,i(f)qkf.

(iii) gi(f) for any (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal g that is contained (under ⊆ ∨qk) in f. For any fuzzy point xαg, since g is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideal, it follows from Proposition 3.6 that U(x;α)qkg and U(ax;α)qkgfor anyaS. Thus, for any xS, we have

6g(x)={α[0,1]|g(x)α}={α[0,1]|xαg}{α[0,1]|U(x;α)qkg,U(ax;α)qkg(aS)}{α[0,1]|U(x;α)qkf,U(ax;α)qkf(aS)}=i(f)(x).

This implies gi(f), as required.

The following two propositions are easy to prove.

Proposition 3.10

Let {fi : iIbe a family of (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup S. Thenifiandifiare both (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideals ofS.

Proposition 3.11

Letfandgbe two (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left ideals of afuzzy ordered semigroup S. Then so isfoeg.

Let Fidl (S) be the set of all (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy ideals of S. Then it follows from Theorem 3.8, 3.9 and Proposition 3.10 that

f={g|gFidl(S),fg}and(f)={g|gFidl(S),gqkf}.

Let us recall that a quantale is a triple (Q,*,⩽) such that (Q, ⩽) is a complete lattice, (Q,*) is a semigroup and for any xQ and {yi}i∈IQ,

x(iyi)=ixyiand(iyi)x=iyix.

Combing Proposition 2.10, 3.10 and 3.11, we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 3.12

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup. Then (Fidl(S), ⊆, ∘e) is a quantale.

4 (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideals

Definition 4.1

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S) . Thenfis called an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy interior ideal ofSif it satisfies(Fla)and for anyx,y,zSand α, β ∈ (0,1], the following conditions hold. (F3a)xα;YBf(xy)αBqkf;(F4a)yαf(xyz)αqkf.

Proposition 4.2

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup andfF(S) . Thenfis an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy interior idealofSif and only if(F1b)f(y)f(x)e(y,x)1k2foranyx,yS;(F3b)f(xy)f(x)f(y)1k2foranyx,yS;(F4b)f(xyz)f(y)1k2foranyx,y,zS.

Proof

The proof is similar to that of Proposition 3.2. □

Proposition 4.3

Let(S, e, ⋅)be a fuzzy ordered semigroup andf ∈ F(S). Thenf is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S if and only if for eachα[0,1k2],fαis either empty or an interior ideal of the ordered semigroupS,α,.

Proof

The proof runs parallel to that of Proposition 3.4. □

Proposition 4.4

LetS be a fuzzy ordered semigroup and f ∈ F(S). Then f is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk-fuzzy interior ideal of S if and only if (F1c) (f]qkf; (F3c) fefqkf; (F4c) fSoefoefSqkf.

Proof

The proof is similar to that of Proposition 3.5. □

Proposition 4.5

Let S be a fuzzy ordered semigroup and f ∈ F(S). Then f is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S if and only if for any x, y, z ∈ S and α ∈ (0, 1], the following conditions hold. (F1d) xαfU(x;α)qkf; (F3d) xα,yBfU(xy;αβ)qkf; (F4d) yαfU(xyz;α)qkf.

Proof

The proof runs parallel to that of Proposition 3.6. □

Theorem 4.6

Let S be a fuzzy ordered semigroup and f ∈ F(S). Put

f(x)={α[0,1]|(α1k2;x[fα]α)or(α>1k2;xfα)}
for any x ∈ S. Then 〈f〉 is the least (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S that contains f, where, for any subset A of S, [A]α is the intersection of all crisp interior ideals of the ordered semigroup (S, ⩽α, ⋅) containing A.
Proof

The proof is similar to that of Theorem 3.8. □

Proposition 4.7

Let{fi:iI}be a family of (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup S. Thenifiis an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S.

Proof

It is easy to verify. □

The following example indicates that ifi is not an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S, in general.

Example 4.8

Consider the fuzzy ordered semigroupS={a,b,c,d},in which fuzzy order e and multiplication . are defined respectively as follows:

Let f and g be two fuzzy subsets of S such that

f=0.3a+0.3b+0c+0d,g=0.3a+0b+0.3c+0d

Then, for any k ∈ [0, 1), both f and g are (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of S, but f ⋃ g is not an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S, since(fg)(bc)=(fg)(d)=f(d)g(d)=0<0.31k2=(fg)(b)(fg)(c)1k2.

In what follows, we discuss the structures of all (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup. By the way, we will give an answer to the question which raises naturally from Example 4.8, that is, under which conditions ifi is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideal?

Before doing this, we first review some basic concepts in lattice theory.

A nonempty subset P of an ordered set L is said to be directed if for every pair of elements x, y ∈ P, there exists an element z ∈ P such that x ⩽ z and y ⩽ z.

Definition 4.9

([35]). A non-empty familyLof a set X is said to be a topped ⋂-structure if

(1) XL.

(2) iIAiLforanynonemptyfamily{Ai}iIofL.

(3) iIAiLforanydirectedfamily{Ai}iIofL.

As a fuzzy version of above definition, we present the following.

Definition 4.10

LetFbe a nonempty family of fuzzy subsets of a set X. ThenFis said to be a topped algebraic fuzzy-structure ⋂-structure if

(1) XF.

(2) iIfiFforanynonemptysubfamily{fi}iIofF.

(3) iIfiFforanydirectedfamily{fi}iIofF.

Let FIidl(S) be the set of all (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of S and FIidl(S).

Theorem 4.11

Let(S,e,)be a fuzzy ordered semigroup. Then(FIidl(S),)is a topped algebraic fuzzy ⋂-structure.

Proof

Clearly, by Proposition 4.7, the items (1) and (2) in Definition 4.10 hold in (FIidl(S),). Now, let {fi}iI be a directed family of FIidl(S). We prove that iIfiFIidl(S). In fact, let f=iIfi, then we obtain: (i) Since each fi(iI) is an (∈, ∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S, for any x, y ∈ S, we have fxey,x1k2=iIfixey,x1k2=iI(fixey,x1x2)iIfiy=iIfiy=fy. (ii) For any x, y ∈ Q, we have

f(xy)=iIfixy=iIfi(xy)iI(fi(x)fi(y)1k2)=iIfixiIfiy1k2Δ=fxfy1k2.

Now, we prove that Equation (¶) holds. It is clear that iIfixfiy1k2iIfixiIfiy1k2. If possible, let iIfixfiy1k2iIfixiIfiy1k2. Then iIfixfiy1k2<iIfixiIfiy1k2, and hence there exists a real number r such that iIfixfiy1k2<r<iIfixiIfiy1k2. On one hand, since r<iIfixiIfiy1k2, there exists i, j ∈ I such that r<fixfiy1k2. Since {fi}iI is directed, there exists kI such that fifk and fjfk Thus, r<fkxfky1k2. On the other hand, form iIfixfiy1k2<r, we have fixfiy1k2<r for every i ∈ I, a contradiction. So, iIfixfiy1k2=iIfixiIfiy1k2.

(iii) For any x, y, z ∈ Q, we have

fxyz=iIfixyz=iIfixyziI(fiy1k2)=(iIfi(y))1k2=fy1k2.

Therefore, f=iIfi is an (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S, i.e., iIfiFIidlS.

Corollary 4.12

Let{fi:iI}be a directed family of (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup S. Thenifiis an (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S.

Let L be a complete lattice. An element x ∈ L is said to be compact, if for any subset PLwithyP, there exists a finite subset QPsuchthatxQ. A complete lattice L is said to be an algebraic lattice, if every x ∈ L can be written as ajoin of compact elements. The following result is well known in lattice theory.

Proposition 4.13

([35]). Every topped algebraic ⋂-structure is an algebraic lattice.

However, using the concept of (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy interior ideals, we can give an example to illustrate that a topped algebraic fuzzy ⋂-structure is generally not an algebraic lattice.

Example 4.14

Let S be a fuzzy ordered semigroup. By Theorem 4.11, (FIidl (S), ⊆) is a topped algebraic fuzzy ⋂-structure and it is trivial that (FIidl (S), ⊆) is a complete lattice. Now, let f ∈ FIidl (S) be such that f.Define a family offuzzy subsets as follows:

gn(x)=(11n+1)f(x),xS,nN.

Then it is easy to veri that gn is an (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S for everynNand{gn}nNis a directed family. Thus, by Theorem 4.11, we havef=n=1gn=n=1gn.However, f can not be expressed as a join (equivalently a union) of any finite sub-family of{gn}nN.Thus f is not a compact element in FIidl (S). Therefore (FIidl (S), ⊆) is not an algebraic lattice because there is no compact element in it more than ∅.

Proposition 4.15

Let (S, ⩽, ⋅) be an ordered semigroup. Given any chain of subsetsS0S1Sn=Sand any chain of relations01...n=ofsuch that Sj is an interior ideal of ordered semigroup (S, ⩽, ⋅) for every j ∈ {1, ..., n}. Then there exist a fuzzy subset of S f and a fuzzy relation e such that f is an (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy interior ideal offuzzy ordered semigroup (S, ⩽, ⋅) in which the level interior ideals of f are exactly the chainS0S1Sn=Sandf1k2=S.

Proof

Let {αi[0,1k2]|,i=0,1,;n} be such that 1k2=α0>α1>>αn. Let f be a fuzzy subset of S and e be a fuzzy relation on S defined respectively by

f(x)=α0,ifxS0α1,ifxS1S0αn,ifxSnSn1ande(x,y)=α0,if(x,y)∈⩽0α1,if(x,y)∈⩽10αn,if(x,y)nn1

for all x, y ∈ S. Then it is not difficult to verify that e is a fuzzy partial order on S such that (S, e, ⋅) is a fuzzy ordered semigroup, and

fα=S0,ifα[α0,1]S0,ifα[α1,α0)Sn,ifα[α1,αn)andα=0,ifα[α0,1]0,ifα[α1,α0)n,ifα[0,αn)

Hence, by the hypothesis, fα is an interior ideal of ordered semigroup (Sα #183;) for every α0,1k2. Thus Proposition 4.3 implies that f is an (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of fuzzy ordered semigroup (S,e,·), and all level interior ideals of f are exactly the chain S0S1Sn=Sandf1k2=S.

Concerning the relationship between (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideals and (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of a fuzzy ordered semigroup, we have the following result.

Proposition 4.16

Let(S,e,·)be a fuzzy ordered semigroup. Then each (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideal ofSis an (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interior ideal ofS.

Proof

It is straightforward.

The converse of Proposition 4.16 is not true in general as shown in the following example.

Example 4.17

Consider the fuzzy ordered semigroupS={a,b,c,d}, where fuzzy ordereand multiplication · aredefined respectively as follows:

Letfbe a fuzzy subsets ofSsuch that

f=0.8a+0.3b+0.6c+0d

Thenfis an $(\in_{\mathrm{D}}\in\ \vee q_{k})$-fuzzy interior ideal but not an (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideal ofSfor any $k\in[0,1$), becausef(cd)=f(b)=0.3<0.6=0.61k2=f(c)1k2.

It is a natural question: under which conditions does the converse of Proposition 4.2 hold? We will answer this question in the next section.

5 Application: characterizations of fuzzy ordered semigroups

As a generalization of semisimple semigroups, the concept of semisimple (crisp) ordered semigroups is proposed by Shabir and Khan in [20]. An ordered semigroup (S,⩽,·) is called semisimple if for any xS, there exist a,b,cS such that xaxbxc. Using fuzzy partial orders, we can now develop a more generalized type of semisimple ordered semigroups.

Definition 5.1

A fuzzy ordered semigroup(S,e,·)is said to be generalized semisimple, if for anyxS, a,b,cse(x,axbxc)1k2.

Let (S,⩽,·) be a semisimple ordered semigroup in the sense of Shabir and Khan, and e ⩽ be the characteristic function of ⩽. Then it is easy to check from Definition 5.1 that (S,e·) is a generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroup. This means that semisimple ordered semigroup is a special case of generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroup.

More generally, we can characterize the relationship between a generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroup and a semisimple ordered semigroup as follows.

Proposition 5.2

A fuzzy ordered semigroup(S,e,·)is generalized semisimple if and only iffor anyα[0,1k2],(S,⩽α·) is a semisimple ordered semigroup.

Proof

The proof is straightforward by Definition 5.1.

Next we answer the question that we proposed in the previous section.

Proposition 5.3

LetSbe a generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroup. Then every (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interiorideal is an $(\in,\ \in\vee q_{k})$-fuzzy ideal ofS.

Proof

Let f be an (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interior ideal of S and x,yS. Then it follows from Propositions 3.2 and Definition 5.1 that

f(xy)zsf(z)e(xy,z)1k2a,b,csf(axbxcy)e(xy,axbxcy)1k2a,b,csf(x)e(xy,axbxcy)1k2a,b,csf(x)e(x,axbxc)1k2=f(x)[a,b,cse(x,axbxc)]1k2f(x)1k2.

Similarly, we can prove that f(xy)f(y)1k2. Thus f is an (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideal of S.

Combining Propositions 4.16 and 5.3, we can conclude that, in any generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroups the concepts of (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideals and (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interior ideals coincide with each other.

Proposition 5.4

A fuzzy ordered semigroup(S,e,·)is generalized semisimple if and only iffkfoeffor every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy idealfofS.

Proof

(⟸) Suppose S is a fuzzy ordered semigroup. Let x be any element of S. Then it is easy to verify that g=:(f{x}S{x}{x}SS{x}S] is an (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideal f of S. Thus, by assumption, we have gkgeg. It follows Proposition 2.12 that

(f{x}S{x}{x}SS{x}S]qk(f{x}S{x}{x}SS{x}S]oe(f{x}S{x}{x}SS{x}S]=(f({x}S{x}{x}SS{x}S)({x}S{x}{x}SS{x}S)]=(f{x2}{x}S{x}{x2}S{x}S{x}SS{x2}S{x}S{x}S{x2}SS{x}S{x}S],

where the last equality follows from the fact that

({x}S{x}{x}SS{x}S)({x}S{x}{x}SS{x}S)={x2}{x}S{x}{x2}S{x}S{x}SS{x2}S{x}S{x}S{x2}SS{x}S{x}S{x}S{x}{x}S2{x}{x}S{x}S{x}S2{x}SS{x}S{x}S{x}S2{x}S{x}S{x}SS{x}S2{x}S={x2}{x}S{x}{x2}S{x}S{x}SS{x2}S{x}S{x}S{x2}SS{x}S{x}S.

Then, from Lemma 2.1 it follows that

1k2(f{x2}U{x}S{x}U{x2}SU{x}S{x}SUS{x2}US{x}S{x}US{x2}SUS{x}S{x}S](x)

Further, by the item (2) of Proposition 2.12, we have 1k2(f{x2}](x)or1k2(f{x}S{x}](x)or1k2(f{x2}S](x)or1k2(f{x}S{x}S](x)or1k2(fS{x2}](x)or1k2(fS{x}S{x}](x)or1k2(fS{x2}S](x)or1k2(fS{x}S{x}S](x).

If1k2(f{x2}](x),then1k2e(xWx2). Since e(x,x2)e(x,x2)e(x2,x3)e(x3,x4)e(x4,x5), we have 1k2e(x,x2)e(x,x5)a,b,cSe(x,axbxc).

if1k2bSe(x,xbx)bSe(x,xbxbxbx)a,b,cSe(x,axbxc).

In a similar way, we can prove that a,b,cSe(x,axbxc)1k2 holds for all cases we listed above.

Consequently, S is a generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroup.

(⟹) Let f be an (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideal of S. Then it follows from Proposition 3.5 that fefqkfSefqkf. On the other hand, for any xS, we have

(fef)(x)=y,zS×Sfye(x,yz)f(z)a,b,cSfaxe(x,axbxc)f(bxc)a,b,cSf(x)e(x,axbxc)f(x)1k2,fx1k2,

implying that fqkfef,and hencefkfef.

Theorem 5.5

A fuzzy ordered semigroupSis generalized semisimple if and only iffor any two (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzyinterior idealsfandgofS, fgkfeg.

Proof

(⟹) Assume that S is a generalized semisimple fuzzy ordered semigroup. Let f and g be (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of S. Then both f and g are (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideals of S. By Proposition 3.5, we have fegqkfefSqkfandfegqkfSegqkg. This derives that fegqkfg. Now, let $x$ be an element of S. Then

(feg)(x)=y,zSf(y)e(x,yz)g(z)a,b,cSf(axb)e(x,(axb)xc)g(xc)a,b,cSf(x)e(x,axbxcy)g(x)1k2f(x)g(x)1k2=(fg)g(x)1k2.

This proves that fgqkfeg,and hencefgkfeg.

(⟸) Assume that the given condition holds. Let f be any (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideals of S. Then, by Proposition 4.16, f is also an (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interior ideals of S. The hypothesis implies that f=ffkfef. Therefore, S is generalized semisimple.

Combining Propositions 5.3 and Theorem 5.5, we obtain the following theorem.

Theorem 5.6

Sbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup. Then the following conditions are equivalent.

(1) Sis generalized semisimple.

(2) fgkfegfor any (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy idealsfandgofS.

(3) fgkfegfor any (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior idealsfandgofS.

(4) fgkfegfor every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy idealfand every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior idealgofS.

(5) fgkfegfor every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior idealfand every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy idealgofS.

6) The set of all (∈, ∈∨ qk-fuzzy ideals ofSforms a semilattice under the multiplicationeand the relationkonF(S), that is, fegkgefandfkfeffor all (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy idealsfandgofS.

(7) The set of all (∈,∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy interior ideals ofSforms a semilattice under the multiplicationeand therelationkonF(S), that is, fegkgefandfkfeffor all (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior idealsfandgofS.

Theorem 5.7

LetSbe a fuzzy ordered semigroup. Then the following conditions are equivalent.

(1) Sis generalized semisimple.

(2) fgqkfegfor every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left idealfand every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interior idealgofS.

(3) fgqkfegfor every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy left idealfand every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy idealgofS.

(4) fgqkfegfor every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy interiorfand every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy right idealgofS.

(5) fgqkfegfor every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy idealfand every (∈,∈ ∨qk)-fuzzy right idealgofS.

Proof

Assume that (1) holds. Let x be an element of S. Then

(feg)(x)=y,zS×Sfye(x,yz)g(z)a,b,cSfaxe(x,ax(bxc))g(bxc)a,b,cSf(x)e(x,axbxcy)g(x)1k2,fxgx1k2=fggx1k2.

This implies that fgqkfeg and hence (2) holds. In a similar way, we can show that (4) holds. And it is clear that (2) ⟹ (3) and (4) ⟹ (5).

Now, assume that (3) holds. Let f be an (∈,∈ ∨qk-fuzzy ideal of S. Then f is also an (∈,∈ ∨qk-fuzzy left ideal of S, hence we have f=ffqkfef On the other hand, Proposition 4.2 implies fefqkf. Thus fkfef, that is (1) holds. In a similar way, we can prove that (5)⟹(1). This completes the proof.

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11371130) and Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20120161110017).

References

[1] Rosenfeld A., fuzzy groups, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 1971, 35, 512–517.10.1016/0022-247X(71)90199-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] Pu PM., Liu YM., Fuzzy topology I: Neighourhood structure of a fuzzy point and Moore-Smith convergence, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 1980, 76, 571–59910.1016/0022-247X(80)90048-7Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bhakat S.K., Das P., On the definition of a fuzzy subgroup, Fuzzy Set Syst., 1992, 51, 235–241.10.1016/0165-0114(92)90196-BSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Davvaz B., (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy subnearrings and ideals, Soft Comput., 2006, 10, 206–211.10.1007/s00500-005-0472-1Search in Google Scholar

[5] Jun YB., Song S.Z., Generalized fuzzy interior ideals in semigroups, Inform. Sci. 2006, 176, 3079–3093.10.1016/j.ins.2005.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kazanci O., Yamak S., Generalized fuzzy bi-ideals of semigroups, Soft computing, 2008, 12, 1119–1124.10.1007/s00500-008-0280-5Search in Google Scholar

[7] Khan A., Shabir M., (α, β)-fuzzy interior ideals in ordered semigroups, Lobachevskii J. Math., 2009, 30, 30–39.10.1134/S1995080209010053Search in Google Scholar

[8] Yin YO., Huang X.K., Xu D.H., Li F., The characterizations of h-semisimple hemirings, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 2009, 11, 116–122.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zhan J.M., Yin YO., A new view of fuzzy k-ideals of hemirings, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology 2012, 23, 169–176.10.3233/IFS-2012-0506Search in Google Scholar

[10] Davvaz B., Khan A., Characterizations of regular ordered semigroups in terms of (α, β)-fuzzy generalized bi-ideals, Inform. Sci., 2011, 181, 1759–1770.10.1016/j.ins.2011.01.009Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jun YB., Generalization of (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy subalgebras in BCK/BCI-algebras, Comput. Math. Appl., 2009, 58, 1383–1390.10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.043Search in Google Scholar

[12] Jun YB., Dudek W.A., Shabir M., Kang M.S., General types of (α, β)-fuzzy ideals of hemirings, Honam Math. J., 2010, 32(3), 413–439.10.5831/HMJ.2010.32.3.413Search in Google Scholar

[13] Shabir M., Jun YB., Nawaz Y., Semigroups characterized by (∈, ∈ ⋅qk)-fuzzy ideals, Comput. Math. Appl., 2010, 60, 1473–1493.10.1016/j.camwa.2010.06.030Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jun YB., Meng J., Xin X.L., On ordered filters of implicative semigroups, Semigroup Forum, 1997, 54, 75–82.10.1007/BF02676588Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kehayopulu N., Tsingelis M., Fuzzy sets in ordered groupoids, Semigroup Forum, 2002, 65, 128–132.10.1007/s002330010079Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kehayopulu N., Tsingelis M., Fuzzy bi-ideals in ordered semigroups, Inform. Sci., 2005, 171, 13–28.10.1016/j.ins.2004.03.015Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kehayopulu N., Tsingelis M., Fuzzy interior ideals in ordered semigroups, Lobachevskii J. Math., 2006, 21, 65–71.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kehayopulu N., Tsingelis M., Regular ordered semigroups in terms of fuzzy subsets, Inform. Sci., 2006, 176, 3675–3693.10.1016/j.ins.2006.02.004Search in Google Scholar

[19] Yin YO., Zhan J.M., Characterization of ordered semigroups in terms of fuzzy soft ideals, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 2012, 4(4): 1–26Search in Google Scholar

[20] Shabir M., Khan A., On fuzzy ordered semigroups, Inform. Sci., 2014, 274, 236–248.10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.107Search in Google Scholar

[21] Xie X.Y, Ideals in lattice-ordered semigroups, Soochow Math. J., 1996, 2275–84.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Xie X.Y, An Introduction to Ordered Semigroup, Publishing Company for Science, Peking, 2001 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zadeh L.A., Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings, Inform. Sci., 1971, 3, 177–200.10.1016/S0020-0255(71)80005-1Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zhang Q.Y, Fan L., Continuity in quantitative domains, Fuzzy Set Syst., 2005, 154(1), 118–131.10.1016/j.fss.2005.01.007Search in Google Scholar

[25] Zhang Q.Y, Xie W.X., Fan L., Fuzzy complete lattices, Fuzzy Set Syst., 2009, 160(16), 2275–2291.10.1016/j.fss.2008.12.001Search in Google Scholar

[26] Lai H.L., Zhang D.X., Fuzzy preorder and fuzzy topology Fuzzy Set Syst., 2006, 157(14), 1865–1885.10.1016/j.fss.2006.02.013Search in Google Scholar

[27] Yao W., Shi F.G., A note on specialization L-preorder of L-topological spaces, L-fuzzifying topological spaces, and L-fuzzy topological spaces, Fuzzy Set Syst., 2008, 159, 2586–2595.10.1016/j.fss.2008.03.023Search in Google Scholar

[28] Hao J., Li O.G., The relationship between L-fuzzy rough set and L-topology, Fuzzy Set Syst., 2011, 178, 74–83.10.1016/j.fss.2011.03.009Search in Google Scholar

[29] Yao W., Quantitative domains via fuzzy sets: Part I: Continuity of directed complete posets, Fuzzy Set Syst., 2010, 161, 973–987.10.1016/j.fss.2009.06.018Search in Google Scholar

[30] Yao W., Shi F.G., Quantitative domains via fuzzy sets: Part II: Fuzzy Scott topology on fuzzy directed-complete posets, Fuzzy Set Syst., 2011, 173, 60–80.10.1016/j.fss.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[31] Hao J., The research on pomoind actions and fuzzy rough sets, PhD thesis, Hunan University, 2011 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[32] Wang K.Y., Some researches on fuzzy domains and fuzzy quantales, PhD thesis, Shaanxi Normal University, 2012 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lidl R., Pilz G., Applied abstract algebra, second ed., Springer, New York, 1998.10.1007/978-1-4757-2941-2Search in Google Scholar

[34] Fan L., A new approach to quantitative domain theory, Electron. Notes Theoret. Comput. Sci., 2001, 45, 77–87.10.1016/S1571-0661(04)80956-3Search in Google Scholar

[35] Davey B.A., Priestley H.A., lntroduction to Lattices and Order, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511809088Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-3-3
Accepted: 2016-9-13
Published Online: 2016-11-14
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

© Huang and Li, published by De Gruyter Open

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Article
  2. A metric graph satisfying w41=1 that cannot be lifted to a curve satisfying dim(W41)=1
  3. Regular Article
  4. On the Riemann-Hilbert problem in multiply connected domains
  5. Regular Article
  6. Hamilton cycles in almost distance-hereditary graphs
  7. Regular Article
  8. Locally adequate semigroup algebras
  9. Regular Article
  10. Parabolic oblique derivative problem with discontinuous coefficients in generalized weighted Morrey spaces
  11. Corrigendum
  12. Corrigendum to: parabolic oblique derivative problem with discontinuous coefficients in generalized weighted Morrey spaces
  13. Regular Article
  14. Some new bounds of the minimum eigenvalue for the Hadamard product of an M-matrix and an inverse M-matrix
  15. Regular Article
  16. Integral inequalities involving generalized Erdélyi-Kober fractional integral operators
  17. Regular Article
  18. Results on the deficiencies of some differential-difference polynomials of meromorphic functions
  19. Regular Article
  20. General numerical radius inequalities for matrices of operators
  21. Regular Article
  22. The best uniform quadratic approximation of circular arcs with high accuracy
  23. Regular Article
  24. Multiple gcd-closed sets and determinants of matrices associated with arithmetic functions
  25. Regular Article
  26. A note on the rate of convergence for Chebyshev-Lobatto and Radau systems
  27. Regular Article
  28. On the weakly(α, ψ, ξ)-contractive condition for multi-valued operators in metric spaces and related fixed point results
  29. Regular Article
  30. Existence of a common solution for a system of nonlinear integral equations via fixed point methods in b-metric spaces
  31. Regular Article
  32. Bounds for the Z-eigenpair of general nonnegative tensors
  33. Regular Article
  34. Subsymmetry and asymmetry models for multiway square contingency tables with ordered categories
  35. Regular Article
  36. End-regular and End-orthodox generalized lexicographic products of bipartite graphs
  37. Regular Article
  38. Refinement of the Jensen integral inequality
  39. Regular Article
  40. New iterative codes for 𝓗-tensors and an application
  41. Regular Article
  42. A result for O2-convergence to be topological in posets
  43. Regular Article
  44. A fixed point approach to the Mittag-Leffler-Hyers-Ulam stability of a fractional integral equation
  45. Regular Article
  46. Uncertainty orders on the sublinear expectation space
  47. Regular Article
  48. Generalized derivations of Lie triple systems
  49. Regular Article
  50. The BV solution of the parabolic equation with degeneracy on the boundary
  51. Regular Article
  52. Malliavin method for optimal investment in financial markets with memory
  53. Regular Article
  54. Parabolic sublinear operators with rough kernel generated by parabolic calderön-zygmund operators and parabolic local campanato space estimates for their commutators on the parabolic generalized local morrey spaces
  55. Regular Article
  56. On annihilators in BL-algebras
  57. Regular Article
  58. On derivations of quantales
  59. Regular Article
  60. On the closed subfields of Q¯~p
  61. Regular Article
  62. A class of tridiagonal operators associated to some subshifts
  63. Regular Article
  64. Some notes to existence and stability of the positive periodic solutions for a delayed nonlinear differential equations
  65. Regular Article
  66. Weighted fractional differential equations with infinite delay in Banach spaces
  67. Regular Article
  68. Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the system mean lifetime via geometric process model
  69. Regular Article
  70. Various limit theorems for ratios from the uniform distribution
  71. Regular Article
  72. On α-almost Artinian modules
  73. Regular Article
  74. Limit theorems for the weights and the degrees in anN-interactions random graph model
  75. Regular Article
  76. An analysis on the stability of a state dependent delay differential equation
  77. Regular Article
  78. The hybrid mean value of Dedekind sums and two-term exponential sums
  79. Regular Article
  80. New modification of Maheshwari’s method with optimal eighth order convergence for solving nonlinear equations
  81. Regular Article
  82. On the concept of general solution for impulsive differential equations of fractional-order q ∈ (2,3)
  83. Regular Article
  84. A Riesz representation theory for completely regular Hausdorff spaces and its applications
  85. Regular Article
  86. Oscillation of impulsive conformable fractional differential equations
  87. Regular Article
  88. Dynamics of doubly stochastic quadratic operators on a finite-dimensional simplex
  89. Regular Article
  90. Homoclinic solutions of 2nth-order difference equations containing both advance and retardation
  91. Regular Article
  92. When do L-fuzzy ideals of a ring generate a distributive lattice?
  93. Regular Article
  94. Fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials
  95. Commentary
  96. Commentary to: Generalized derivations of Lie triple systems
  97. Regular Article
  98. Simple sufficient conditions for starlikeness and convexity for meromorphic functions
  99. Regular Article
  100. Global stability analysis and control of leptospirosis
  101. Regular Article
  102. Random attractors for stochastic two-compartment Gray-Scott equations with a multiplicative noise
  103. Regular Article
  104. The fuzzy metric space based on fuzzy measure
  105. Regular Article
  106. A classification of low dimensional multiplicative Hom-Lie superalgebras
  107. Regular Article
  108. Structures of W(2.2) Lie conformal algebra
  109. Regular Article
  110. On the number of spanning trees, the Laplacian eigenvalues, and the Laplacian Estrada index of subdivided-line graphs
  111. Regular Article
  112. Parabolic Marcinkiewicz integrals on product spaces and extrapolation
  113. Regular Article
  114. Prime, weakly prime and almost prime elements in multiplication lattice modules
  115. Regular Article
  116. Pochhammer symbol with negative indices. A new rule for the method of brackets
  117. Regular Article
  118. Outcome space range reduction method for global optimization of sum of affine ratios problem
  119. Regular Article
  120. Factorization theorems for strong maps between matroids of arbitrary cardinality
  121. Regular Article
  122. A convergence analysis of SOR iterative methods for linear systems with weak H-matrices
  123. Regular Article
  124. Existence theory for sequential fractional differential equations with anti-periodic type boundary conditions
  125. Regular Article
  126. Some congruences for 3-component multipartitions
  127. Regular Article
  128. Bound for the largest singular value of nonnegative rectangular tensors
  129. Regular Article
  130. Convolutions of harmonic right half-plane mappings
  131. Regular Article
  132. On homological classification of pomonoids by GP-po-flatness of S-posets
  133. Regular Article
  134. On CSQ-normal subgroups of finite groups
  135. Regular Article
  136. The homogeneous balance of undetermined coefficients method and its application
  137. Regular Article
  138. On the saturated numerical semigroups
  139. Regular Article
  140. The Bruhat rank of a binary symmetric staircase pattern
  141. Regular Article
  142. Fixed point theorems for cyclic contractive mappings via altering distance functions in metric-like spaces
  143. Regular Article
  144. Singularities of lightcone pedals of spacelike curves in Lorentz-Minkowski 3-space
  145. Regular Article
  146. An S-type upper bound for the largest singular value of nonnegative rectangular tensors
  147. Regular Article
  148. Fuzzy ideals of ordered semigroups with fuzzy orderings
  149. Regular Article
  150. On meromorphic functions for sharing two sets and three sets in m-punctured complex plane
  151. Regular Article
  152. An incremental approach to obtaining attribute reduction for dynamic decision systems
  153. Regular Article
  154. Very true operators on MTL-algebras
  155. Regular Article
  156. Value distribution of meromorphic solutions of homogeneous and non-homogeneous complex linear differential-difference equations
  157. Regular Article
  158. A class of 3-dimensional almost Kenmotsu manifolds with harmonic curvature tensors
  159. Regular Article
  160. Robust dynamic output feedback fault-tolerant control for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems with interval time-varying delay via improved delay partitioning approach
  161. Regular Article
  162. New bounds for the minimum eigenvalue of M-matrices
  163. Regular Article
  164. Semi-quotient mappings and spaces
  165. Regular Article
  166. Fractional multilinear integrals with rough kernels on generalized weighted Morrey spaces
  167. Regular Article
  168. A family of singular functions and its relation to harmonic fractal analysis and fuzzy logic
  169. Regular Article
  170. Solution to Fredholm integral inclusions via (F, δb)-contractions
  171. Regular Article
  172. An Ulam stability result on quasi-b-metric-like spaces
  173. Regular Article
  174. On the arrowhead-Fibonacci numbers
  175. Regular Article
  176. Rough semigroups and rough fuzzy semigroups based on fuzzy ideals
  177. Regular Article
  178. The general solution of impulsive systems with Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives
  179. Regular Article
  180. A remark on local fractional calculus and ordinary derivatives
  181. Regular Article
  182. Elastic Sturmian spirals in the Lorentz-Minkowski plane
  183. Topical Issue: Metaheuristics: Methods and Applications
  184. Bias-variance decomposition in Genetic Programming
  185. Topical Issue: Metaheuristics: Methods and Applications
  186. A novel generalized oppositional biogeography-based optimization algorithm: application to peak to average power ratio reduction in OFDM systems
  187. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  188. Modeling of vibration for functionally graded beams
  189. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  190. Decomposition of a second-order linear time-varying differential system as the series connection of two first order commutative pairs
  191. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  192. Differential equations associated with generalized Bell polynomials and their zeros
  193. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  194. Differential equations for p, q-Touchard polynomials
  195. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  196. A new approach to nonlinear singular integral operators depending on three parameters
  197. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  198. Performance and stochastic stability of the adaptive fading extended Kalman filter with the matrix forgetting factor
  199. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  200. On new characterization of inextensible flows of space-like curves in de Sitter space
  201. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  202. Convergence theorems for a family of multivalued nonexpansive mappings in hyperbolic spaces
  203. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  204. Fractional virus epidemic model on financial networks
  205. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  206. Reductions and conservation laws for BBM and modified BBM equations
  207. Special Issue on Recent Developments in Differential Equations
  208. Extinction of a two species non-autonomous competitive system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and the effect of toxic substances
Downloaded on 19.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2016-0076/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button