Quantifying areality: A study of prenasalisation in Southeast Asia and New Guinea

Mark Donohue; Bronwen Whiting

doi:10.1515/lity.2011.005

Article

Quantifying areality: A study of prenasalisation in Southeast Asia and New Guinea

Mark Donohue and Bronwen Whiting

Published/Copyright: September 5, 2011

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Volume 15 Issue 1

Abstract

Although “areality” and the idea of a linguistic area has become well-established in the literature, the notions remain controversial, mainly because of the lack of agreement about what constitutes linguistic areality and the subjective nature of their definition. This article follows the lead of Nichols 1992 and Bickel & Nichols 2006 in using statistical techniques for analysing the distribution of variables in different populations. We examine the frequency of occurrence of plosive prenasalisation in the Southeast Asia/New Guinea region as a test case for the robustness of simple statistical techniques and of more sophisticated techniques specifically designed for modelling the spatial distribution of variables.

Keywords:: linguistic area; methodology; New Guinea; prenasalisation; phoneme inventories; phonology; Southeast Asia

Correspondence address: Linguistics, ANU College of Asia & the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia

Received: 2007-12-07

Revised: 2011-05-23

Published Online: 2011-09-05

Published in Print: 2011-June

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.005

Keywords for this article

linguistic area; methodology; New Guinea; prenasalisation; phoneme inventories; phonology; Southeast Asia