Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Recipient-prominence vs. beneficiary-prominence
-
Seppo Kittilä
Published/Copyright:
November 24, 2005
Abstract
Surveying the encoding of the semantic roles of recipient, beneficiary, and recipient-beneficiary from a crosslinguistic perspective, the paper has two goals. First, by focusing on the encoding of the dual role of recipient-beneficiary, it tries to show that languages vary in the marking of this role: they either encode it the same way as they encode recipients or beneficiaries; in the case of recipient and beneficiary this variation is excluded. Second, current definitions of the label BENEFACTIVE will be scrutinized, since this notion is split in a number of languages and the terminology proposed here is empirically more appropriate in some cases.
:
Published Online: 2005-11-24
Published in Print: 2005-11-18
Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Restrictions on phonemes in affixes: A crosslinguistic test of a popular hypothesis
- The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia
- Recipient-prominence vs. beneficiary-prominence
- A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir
- Yeniseic diathesis
- Book Review
Articles in the same Issue
- Restrictions on phonemes in affixes: A crosslinguistic test of a popular hypothesis
- The semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: The non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern Australia
- Recipient-prominence vs. beneficiary-prominence
- A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir
- Yeniseic diathesis
- Book Review
