Home Asymmetry in French speech-in-noise perception: the effects of native dialect and cross-dialectal exposure
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Asymmetry in French speech-in-noise perception: the effects of native dialect and cross-dialectal exposure

  • Scott Kunkel ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 27, 2025
Linguistics Vanguard
From the journal Linguistics Vanguard

Abstract

Research has shown that speakers’ native production patterns can change after living in adulthood in a region where a second dialect (D2) of their native language is spoken, yet relatively little is known about how speech perception changes after postadolescent D2 exposure. This study explores this topic by examining how varying degrees of exposure to Quebec French and Hexagonal French affect comprehension of speech in these dialects. A speech-in-noise perception experiment was conducted among mobile and nonmobile speakers of Quebec and Hexagonal French to test the competing effects of native dialect and D2 exposure on cross-dialectal speech perception. Results show an own-dialect advantage for all groups in their comprehension of speech in noise, though this advantage is smaller for the mobile groups, particularly for the mobile Hexagonal French listeners. An effect of D2 exposure on D2 perception is also revealed for the mobile Hexagonal listeners but not for the Québécois listeners, indicating an asymmetry in cross-dialectal perception. These findings suggest that, while phonological representations for the native dialect remain robust, processing of D2 speech can improve after extended, postadolescent exposure to this dialect. Furthermore, the extent of this adaptation may be modulated by mobile listeners’ prior experience with this dialect.


Corresponding author: Scott Kunkel, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; and Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

My thanks go to Adam Chong, as well as to the audiences at ConSOLE32 and ICLaVE12, for their helpful feedback on earlier versions of this study. My thanks also go to Abby Walker for sharing her analysis script with me. I also thank two anonymous reviewers, whose insightful comments helped strengthen this article. Lastly, I extend my thanks to those individuals who assisted in recording and piloting the stimuli. All remaining errors are my own.

Appendix

Subset of 64 French HINT sentences included in speech-in-noise experiment (from Vaillancourt et al. 2005). Non-keywords are shown in parentheses. “Audio file” refers to the unique identifier accompanying each stimulus in the OSF repository.

Speaker Audio file Sentence Translation
QF1 00007 (Ce) musicien joue (du) piano This musician plays the piano
QF1 00010 (Cette) histoire (est) triste This story is sad
QF1 00014 (Elle) écoute (la) radio She listens to the radio
QF1 00042 (Il) (ne) faut (pas) manger vite You must not eat quickly
QF1 00045 (Il) voyage dans l’espace He travels in space
QF1 00082 (Le) bûcheron coupe (du) bois The lumberjack cuts wood
QF1 00085 (Le) chien dormait dehors The dog was sleeping outside
QF1 00113 (Le) chocolat (a) fondu The chocolate melted
QF2 00008 (Cette) dame aime (se) faire bronzer The woman likes to tan
QF2 00017 (Elle) nage dans (la) rivière She swims in the river
QF2 00037 (Il) mange (sa) soupe He eats his soup
QF2 00042 (Il) vit dans (la) jungle He lives in the jungle
QF2 00051 (Je) bois (du) chocolat chaud I drink hot chocolate
QF2 00072 (La) mère berce (son) enfant The mother rocks her child
QF2 00102 (Ma) mère range (la) vaisselle My mother puts away the dishes
QF2 00116 (Son) frère ramasse (les) poubelles My brother collects the garbage
QF3 00008 (Ces) champignons (sont) bruns The mushrooms are brown
QF3 00023 (Elle) prend (un) bain chaud She is taking a warm bath
QF3 00047 (Ils) bâtissent (une) école They are building a school
QF3 00054 (Je) vais m’asseoir sur (ce) banc I am going to sit on this bench
QF3 00059 L’écureuil grimpe dans l’arbre The squirrel is climbing the tree
QF3 00080 (La) valise (est) pleine de linge The suitcase is full of laundry
QF3 00110 (Notre) fille (se) marie demain Our daughter is getting married tomorrow
QF3 00120 Tout (le) monde (est) en classe Every one is in class
QF4 00011 (Les) choux poussent dans (le) jardin The cabbages grow in the garden
QF4 00018 (Le) lapin ronge (une) carotte The rabbit gnaws on a carrot
QF4 00030 (Elle) saute sur (le) trampoline She is jumping on the trampoline
QF4 00032 (Il) (est) parti (à) (la) pêche He went fishing
QF4 00039 L’éléphant (a) (une) longue trompe The elephant has a long trunk
QF4 00048 (Ils) (ont) trouvé (un) sapin They found a fir tree
QF4 00057 (Sa) mère fait (une) tarte Her mother is making a tart
QF4 00119 (Le) fromage sent mauvais The cheese smells bad
HF1 00019 (Elle) prend soin de (sa) mère She takes care of her mother
HF1 00034 (Il) (est) professeur d’histoire He is a history professor
HF1 00038 (Il) mange (un) morceau de tarte He eats a piece of tart
HF1 00055 (Le) marchand vend (des) bonbons The shopkeeper sells candy
HF1 00074 (Elle) pointe du doigt She is pointing her finger
HF1 00093 (Le) petit garçon chante bien The little boy sings well
HF1 00099 (Les) oiseaux chantent dans l’arbre The birds sing in the tree
HF1 00119 (Tu) (as) caché (mon) jouet You hid my toy
HF2 00005 (Ce) garçon pédale très vite The boy pedals very quickly
HF2 00037 (J’ai) fait cuire (du) poisson I cooked fish
HF2 00069 (La) cuisine (est) grande The kitchen is big
HF2 00070 (La) fenêtre (est) ouverte The window is open
HF2 00079 (La) vache mange (du) foin The cow is eating hay
HF2 00100 (Les) livres (sont) tous bien rangés The books are neatly arranged
HF2 00105 Maman (a) fait cuire (une) dinde Mom cooked a turkey
HF2 00112 Papa tirait (le) chariot Daddy pulled the wagon
HF3 00015 (Il) (a) compté jusqu’à dix He counted to ten
HF3 00017 (La) petite fille cherche (sa) bague The little girl is looking for her ring
HF3 00026 (Ma) tante fait (de) (la) couture My aunt sews
HF3 00035 (Il) mange avec (une) fourchette He eats with a fork
HF3 00043 (Les) tulipes (sont) jolies The tulips are pretty
HF3 00091 (La) salle (était) vide The room was empty
HF3 00092 Tous (les) chats (sont) gris All the cats are gray
HF3 00117 (Le) cochon joue dans (la) boue The pig is playing in the mud
HF4 00001 (C’est) (une) perle rare It is a rare pearl
HF4 00003 (Ce) chemin mène (au) village This path leads to the village
HF4 00056 L’oiseau (est) sur (une) branche The bird is on a branch
HF4 00118 (Le) chèvre mangeait (de) l’herbe The goat ate grass
HF4 00089 (Le) facteur apporte (une) lettre The mailman delivers a letter
HF4 00109 L’argent (est) à (la) banque The money is at the bank
HF4 00115 (Ses) yeux sont remplis de larmes His eyes are filled with tears
HF4 00118 Tous (les) poissons vivent dans l’eau All fish live in water

References

Adank, Patti, Bronwen G. Evans, Jane Stuart-Smith & Sophie K. Scott. 2009. Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35(2). 520–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013552.Search in Google Scholar

Ahn, Sunyoung, Charles B. Chang, Robert DeKeyser & Sunyoung Lee-Ellis. 2017. Age effects in first language attrition: Speech perception by Korean-English bilinguals. Language Learning 67(3). 694–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12252.Search in Google Scholar

Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander L., Jessica Massonnié, Adam Flitton, Natasha Kirkham & Jo K. Evershed. 2020. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods 52. 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x.Search in Google Scholar

Baese-Berk, Melissa M., Susannah V. Levi & Kristin J. Van Engen. 2023. Intelligibility as a measure of speech perception: Current approaches, challenges, and recommendations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 153(1). 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0016806.Search in Google Scholar

Banai, Karen & Limor Lavie. 2020. Rapid perceptual learning and individual differences in speech perception: The good, the bad, and the sad. Auditory Perception and Cognition 3(4). 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2021.1909400.Search in Google Scholar

Bench, John, Åse Kowal & John Bamford. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology 13(3). 108–112. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005367909078884.Search in Google Scholar

Bent, Tessa, Holly Lind-Combs, Rachael F. Holt & Cynthia Clopper. 2023. Perception of regional and nonnative accents: A comparison of museum laboratory and online data collection. Linguistics Vanguard 9(s4). 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0157.Search in Google Scholar

Bigot, Davy & Robert A. Papen. 2013. Sur la “norme” du français oral au Québec (et au Canada en général). Langage et Societe 146(4). 115–132.10.3917/ls.146.0115Search in Google Scholar

Bowie, David F. 2000. The effect of geographic mobility on the retention of a local dialect. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bradlow, Ann R. & Tessa Bent. 2008. Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition 106(2). 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Violet A., Drew J. McLaughlin, Julia F. Strand & Kristin J. Van Engen. 2020. Rapid adaptation to fully intelligible nonnative-accented speech reduces listening effort. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73(9). 1431–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820916726.Search in Google Scholar

Bürkner, Paul C. 2017. brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software 80. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01.Search in Google Scholar

Celata, Chiara & Jessica Cancila. 2010. Phonological attrition and the perception of geminate consonants in the Lucchese community of San Francisco (CA). International Journal of Bilingualism 14(2). 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006910363058.Search in Google Scholar

Chalier, Marc. 2019. La norme de prononciation québécoise en changement (1970–2008)? L’affrication de /t, d/ et l’antériorisation de /ɑ̃/ chez les présentateurs des journaux télévisés de Radio-Canada. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 64(3). 407–443. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2018.42.Search in Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack K. 1992. Dialect acquisition. Language 68(4). 673–705. https://doi.org/10.2307/416850.Search in Google Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia G. 2014. Sound change in the individual: Effects of exposure on cross-dialect speech processing. Laboratory Phonology 5(1). 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014-0004.Search in Google Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia G. & Anne R. Bradlow. 2008. Perception of dialect variation in noise: Intelligibility and classification. Language and Speech 51(3). 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830908098539.Search in Google Scholar

Clopper, Cynthia G. & Laura Wagner. 2019. Regional dialect intelligibilty across the lifespan. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), 5-9 August 2019. Melbourne, Australia.Search in Google Scholar

Cristia, Alejandrina, Amanda Seidl, Charlotte Vaughn, Rachel Schmale, Ann Bradlow & Caroline Floccia. 2012. Linguistic processing of accented speech across the lifespan. Frontiers in Psychology 3. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00479.Search in Google Scholar

Daidone, Danielle. 2018. Insert silence at start of all files in folder [Praat script]. Modified 20 February 2018. Available at: https://www.ddaidone.com/uploads/1/0/5/2/105292729/insert_silence_at_start_of_all_files_in_folder.txt/.Search in Google Scholar

de Leeuw, Esther, Enkeleida Kapia & Scott Lewis. 2023. Sound change in Albanian monolinguals and Albanian–English sequential bilingual returnees in Tirana, Albania. Languages 8(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010080.Search in Google Scholar

Dufour, Sophie, Noël Nguyen & Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder. 2007. The perception of phonemic contrasts in a non-native dialect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(4). EL131–EL136. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2710742.Search in Google Scholar

Dufour, Sophie, Yu-Ying Chuang & Noël Nguyen. 2019. The processing of dialectal variants: Further insight from French. Applied Psycholinguistics 40(2). 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716418000607.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Bronwen G. & Paul Iverson. 2007. Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(6). 3814–3826. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2722209.Search in Google Scholar

Floccia, Caroline, Jeremy Goslin, Frédérique Girard & Gabrielle Konopczynski. 2006. Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32(5). 1276–1293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1276.Search in Google Scholar

Gooskens, Charlotte & Vincent J. van Heuven. 2021. Mutual intelligibility. In Marcos Zampieri (ed.). Similar languages, varieties, and dialects: A computational perspective, 51–95. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108565080.006Search in Google Scholar

Impe, Leen, Dirk Geeraerts & Dirk Speelman. 2008. Mutual intelligibility of standard and regional Dutch language varieties. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2(1–2). 101–117. https://doi.org/10.3366/e1753854809000330.Search in Google Scholar

Kircher, Ruth. 2012. How pluricentric is the French language? An investigation of attitudes towards Quebec French compared to European French. Journal of French Language Studies 22(3). 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959269512000014.Search in Google Scholar

Kunkel, Scott, Elisa Passoni & Esther de Leeuw. 2023. Perceptual discrimination of phonemic contrasts in Quebec French: Exposure to Quebec French does not improve perception in Hexagonal French native speakers living in Quebec. Languages 8(3). 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030193.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William & Sharon Ash. 1997. Understanding Birmingham. In Cynthia Bernstein, Thomas Nunnally & Robin Sabino (eds.), Language variety in the south revisited, 508–573. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lebrun, Monique. 2007. Les tensions et débats dans l’enseignement du français au Québec. Le Français Aujourd’hui 156(1). 87–93. https://doi.org/10.3917/lfa.156.0087.Search in Google Scholar

Lenth, Russell. 2023. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means, version 1.8.9. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.Search in Google Scholar

Martineau, France, Wim Remysen & André Thibault. 2022. Le français au Québec et en Amérique du Nord. Paris: Édition Ophrys.Search in Google Scholar

Mauchand, Maël & Marc D. Pell. 2022. French or Québécois? How speaker accents shape implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes among francophones in Montréal. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement 54(1). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000292.Search in Google Scholar

McCloy, Daniel R., Richard A. Wright & Pamela E. Souza. 2015. Talker vs. dialect effects on speech intelligibility: A symmetrical study. Language and Speech 58(3). 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830914559234.Search in Google Scholar

Newkline Co. 2022. Awesome Voice Recorder X, version 8.1.0 [Mobile app]. App Store. Available at: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/avr-x-voice-recorder/id1344740222.Search in Google Scholar

Nycz, Jennifer. 2015. Second dialect acquisition: A sociophonetic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass 9(11). 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12163.Search in Google Scholar

Oakes, Leigh. 2021. Pluricentric linguistic justice: A new ethics-based approach to pluricentricity in French and other languages. Sociolinguistica 35(1). 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2021-0004.Search in Google Scholar

Payne, Arvilla C. 1976. The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Pöll, Bernhard. 2017. Normes endogènes, variétés de prestige et pluralité normative. In Ursula Reutner (ed.), Manuel des francophonies, 65–86. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110348217-003Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2024. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

Reinke, Kristin & Luc Ostiguy. 2016. Le français québécois d’aujourd’hui. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110349306Search in Google Scholar

Samuel, Arthur G. & Tanya Kraljic. 2009. Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 71(6). 1207–1218. https://doi.org/10.3758/app.71.6.1207.Search in Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian. 2018. Language change across the lifespan. Annual Review of Linguistics 4. 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045438.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Donia R. & Anne Cutler. 1984. Segmental phonology and the perception of syntactic structure. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23(4). 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(84)90291-3.Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, Jeff. 2010. Second dialect acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511777820Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Rachel, Sophie Holmes-Elliott, Michèle Pettinato & Rachael-Anne Knight. 2014. Cross-accent intelligibility of speech in noise: Long-term familiarity and short-term familiarization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67(3). 590–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.822009.Search in Google Scholar

Sumner, Meghan & Reiko Kataoka. 2013. Effects of phonetically-cued talker variation on semantic encoding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134(6). EL485–EL491. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4826151.Search in Google Scholar

Sumner, Meghan & Arthur G. Samuel. 2009. The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language 60(4). 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Vaillancourt, Véronique, Chantal Laroche, Chantal Mayer, Cynthia Basque, Madeleine Nali, Alice Eriks-Brophy, Sigfrid D. Soli & Christian Giguère. 2005. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. International Journal of Audiology 44(6). 358–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020500060875.Search in Google Scholar

Vasishth, Shravan, Bruno Nicenboim, Mary E. Beckman, Fangfang Li & Eun Jong Kong. 2018. Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction. Journal of Phonetics 71. 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.008.Search in Google Scholar

Vaughn, Charlotte R. 2019. Expectations about the source of a speaker’s accent affect accent adaptation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145(5). 3218–3232. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5108831.Search in Google Scholar

Voeten, Cesko C. 2021. Individual differences in the adoption of sound change. Language and Speech 64(3). 705–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920959753.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, Abby. 2018. The effect of long-term second dialect exposure on sentence transcription in noise. Journal of Phonetics 71. 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Werker, Janet F. & Takao K. Hensch. 2015. Critical periods in speech perception: New directions. Annual Review of Psychology 66. 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104.Search in Google Scholar

Winn, Matthew. 2023. Mix speech with noise, version 6 [Praat script]. Available at: https://github.com/ListenLab/Praat/blob/master/Mix_speech_and_noise.txt/.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Richard & Pamela Souza. 2012. Comparing identification of standardized and regionally valid vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55(1). 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0278).Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Cong, Kathleen Jepson, Georg Lohfink & Amalia Arvaniti. 2021. Comparing acoustic analyses of speech data collected remotely. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149(6). 3910–3916. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0005132.Search in Google Scholar

Ziliak, Zoe L. 2012. The relationship between perception and production in adult acquisition of a new dialect’s phonetic system. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-10-31
Accepted: 2025-02-07
Published Online: 2025-03-27

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0247/html?srsltid=AfmBOoq_e0_7A8lu6OAy2FIQNBnlwFAl6nTWOFS8HgVOZx5tI_KwKCRy
Scroll to top button