Attitudinal negotiation: the analysis of online commentary videos about an international event on Chinese social media platform bilibili.com
-
Nana Zhou
Abstract
This article proposes a paradigm of attitudinal analysis of commentary videos on a social media platform to illustrate attitudinal negotiation about a particular international event. It adopts a research-driven approach to evaluate verbal expressions of commentary videos concerning Japan’s discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea posted on Chinese social media platform bilibili.com. The results show that the original appraiser might not be verified, but replaced by the influencer as the secondary appraiser, which features the subjectivity of social media. The appraised targets can be textually tracked or semantically interpreted. Their clusters unfold the development of themes in different phases and stages in digital discourses. The attitudinal value can be affected by sociocultural or ecological factor, the previous or subsequent utterances, or sarcasm. The clusters of attitudinal values could imply massive homogeneous groups in social media communication. The article offers insights for attitudinal analysis of other international events on social media.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the paper.
References
Bednarek, Monika. 2008. Emotion talk across corpora. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230285712Suche in Google Scholar
Chen, Si. 2017. A sociolinguistic study of top ten Chinese catchwords in 2015: Generation differences in use and attitude – A case study of students at Jilin University and their parents. Changchun: Jilin University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Chen, Wenge & Ranran Zhang. 2024. The interpersonal semantics of rhetoric: Ideological variations and their rhetorical construction in the GM debate in China. Pragmatics and Society 15(2). 246–274. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21011.che.Suche in Google Scholar
Coffin, Caroline & Kieran O’Halloran. 2005. Finding the global groove: Theorizing and analyzing dynamic reader positioning using appraisal, corpus, and a concordance. Critical Discourse Studies 2(2). 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500283607.Suche in Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun. 2009. Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511575273Suche in Google Scholar
Doran, Yaegan. 2020. Seeing values: Axiology and affording attitude in Australia’s “invasion”. In James Martin, Karl Maton & Yaegan Doran (eds.), Accessing academic discourse: Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory, 151–176. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429280726-6Suche in Google Scholar
Esposito, Eleonora & Majid KhosraviNik. 2023. Digital distribution processes and “new” research tools in SM-CDS 15. In Majid KhosraviNik (ed.), Social media and society: Integrating the digital with the social in digital discourse, 15–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.100.02espSuche in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1967. Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 2002. Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic function. In Michael Halliday & Jonathan Webster (eds.), On grammar (Collected Works of Michael Halliday 1), 196–218. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. Revised by Christian Matthiessen, 4th edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Suche in Google Scholar
Hanson, Anders & David Machin. 2019. Media and communication research methods, 2nd edn. England: Red Globe Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hermida, Alfred. 2015. Nothing but the truth: Redrafting the journalistic boundary of verification. In Matt Carlson & Seth Lewis (eds.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation, 37–50. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315727684-3Suche in Google Scholar
Hood, Susan & James Martin. 2007. Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, vol. 2, 739–764. London: Equinox.10.3138/9781845535803-027Suche in Google Scholar
Institute of Linguistics, CASS. 2016. Modern Chinese dictionary, 7th edn. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Inwood, Olivia & Michele Zappavigna. 2023. Conspiracy theories and white supremacy on YouTube: Exploring affiliation and legitimation strategies in YouTube comments. Social Media + Society 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221150410.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, James & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar
Martin, James & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Suche in Google Scholar
Martínez, Ana & Katherine Wartmann. 2009. Online social networking on campus: Understanding what matters in student culture. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Maton, Karl. 2014. Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203885734Suche in Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, John. 2012. Challenging values: The “good” journalist online. In Eugenia Siapera & Andreas Veglis (eds.), The handbook of global online journalism, 39–58. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118313978.ch3Suche in Google Scholar
Pan, Pan. 1998. On generalization of familial vocatives. Applied Linguistics 2. 34–38.Suche in Google Scholar
Quan-Haase, Anabel & Luke Sloan. 2017. Introduction. In Luke Sloan & Anabel Quan-Haase (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods, 1–10. Los Angeles: Sage.10.4135/9781529782943.n2Suche in Google Scholar
Ravelli, Louise. 2005. Getting started with functional analysis of texts. In Len Unsworth (ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives, 27–64. London: Cassell.Suche in Google Scholar
Rubin, Victoria. 2017. Deception detection and rumor debunking for social media. In Luke Sloan & Anabel Quan-Haase (eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media research methods, 342–364. Los Angeles: Sage.10.4135/9781473983847.n21Suche in Google Scholar
Thibault, Paul. 2004. Brain, mind and the signifying body. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110226102.1.29Suche in Google Scholar
Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2015. Resisting epistemologies of user-generated content? Cooptation, segregation and the boundaries of journalism. In Matt Carlson & Seth Lewis (eds.), Boundaries of journalism: Professionalism, practices and participation, 169–185. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315727684-11Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, Chong. 1991. Discourse weighting in the balance. Changsha: Yuelu Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, Shanghao & Zhengpeng Luo. 2023. “Wish everyone safe and sound”: Ambient affiliation in online comments on medical consultation videos on bilibili.com. Discourse, Context & Media 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100714/.Suche in Google Scholar
White, Peter. 2011. Appraisal. In Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Discursive pragmatics, 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Xu, Qingxin & Yi Jing. 2024. Ambient identity construction via massive anonymous danmu comments. Language Science 104. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101631.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Delu. 2019. Grammatical patterns in engagement in the appraisal theory. Journal of Foreign Language 42(2). 2–10.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhang, Qian. 2023. Research on the generalization of kinship appellations in modern Chinese: Take “dear”, “family”, “husband” and “wife” as examples. Zhengzhou: Henan University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Zhu, Wanjin. 2013. New introduction to sociolinguistics. Beijing: Peking University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2024-0206).
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
