Do we really need a Multimodal Construction Grammar?

References

Armstrong, Nancy & Melissa Wagner. 2003. Field guide to gestures – how to identify and interpret virtually every gesture known to man. Philadelphia: Quirk.Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Hans C. & Alexander Ziem. In preparation. Constructing a constructicon for German. Empirical, theoretical, and methodological issues.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00213.xSearch in Google Scholar

Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1). 1–28.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan. 2015. Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition 7. 499–514.10.1017/langcog.2015.20Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Fabbri-Destro, Maddalena, Pietro Avanzini, Elisa De Stefani, Alessandro Innocenti, Cristina Campi & Maurizio Gentilucci. 2015. Interaction between words and symbolic gestures as revealed by N400. Brain Topography 28(4). 591–605.10.1007/s10548-014-0392-4Search in Google Scholar

Feyaerts, Kurt, Geert Brône, Paul Sambre, Bert Oben, Steven Schoonjans & Elisabeth Zima. 2014. Accounting for multimodality in construction grammar. Talk at DGKL 6, Nürnberg-Erlangen, October 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2). 222–254.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1988. The mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar’. Berkeley Linguistic Society 14. 35–55.10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary C. O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–38.10.2307/414531Search in Google Scholar

Fricke, Ellen. 2012. Grammatik multimodal: Wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken. Berlin und Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218893Search in Google Scholar

Fried, Mirjam & Jan-Ola Östman. 2004. Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective, 11–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.2.02friSearch in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5). 219–224.10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg Adele E. 2013. Constructionist Approaches. In Hoffmann and Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017. Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 10.1515/lingvan-2016-0042.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (eds.). 2013. The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visual action as utterance. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1991. Cognitive versus generative linguistics: How commitments influence results. Language and Communication 1(1). 53–62.10.1016/0271-5309(91)90018-QSearch in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 1998. Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz.Search in Google Scholar

Radden, Günter. 2006. The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In Elzbieta Górska & Günter Radden (eds.), Metonymy – metaphor collage, 99–120. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 2006 [1916]. Course in general linguistics, Ed. By Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye. Trans. Roy Harris. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Schoonjans, Steven, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts. 2015. Multimodalität in der Konstruktionsgrammatik: Eine kritische Betrachtung illustriert anhand einer Gestikanalyse der Partikel einfach. In Jörg Bücker, Wolfgang Imo & Susanne Günthner, (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V. Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequentiellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten, 291–308. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Search in Google Scholar

Steen, Francis & Mark Turner. 2013. Multimodal Construction Grammar. In Michael Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 255–274. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2013. Collostructional analysis. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 290–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0016Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Antatol. 2011. Konstruktionsgrammatik und Grammatiktheorie. In Alexander Lasch & Alexander Ziem (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III: Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze, 13–27. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Search in Google Scholar

Stuckenbrock, Anja. 2015. Deixis in der Face-to-face-Interaktion. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110307436Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2014. Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 1, 16–187. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition: An essay. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674044371Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander. 2014a. Frames of understanding in text and discourse: Theoretical foundations and descriptive applications (= Human Cognitive Processing 48). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.48Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander. 2014b. Konstruktionsgrammatische Konzepte eines Konstruktikons. In Alexander Lasch & Alexander Ziem (eds.), Grammatik als Netzwerk von Konstruktionen. Sprachliches Wissen im Fokus der Konstruktionsgrammatik, 15–34. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110353693.15Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander. 2015. Probleme und Desiderata einer Social Construction Grammar. In Alexander Ziem & Alexander Lasch (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik IV. Konstruktionen als soziale Konventionen und kognitive Routinen, 1–22. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander & Alexander Lasch. 2013. Konstruktionsgrammatik. Konzepte und Grundlagen gebrauchsbasierter Ansätze. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110295641Search in Google Scholar

Zima, Elisabeth. 2014. Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V(motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 15. 1–48.Search in Google Scholar

Zima, Elisabeth. In press. Multimodal constructional resemblance. The case of English circular motion constructions. In Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza, Alba Luzondo & Paula Pérez-Sobrino (eds.), Constructing families of constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar