Home Semantic bias and morphological regularity in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: what is the relation?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Semantic bias and morphological regularity in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: what is the relation?

  • Yasuhiro Shirai
Published/Copyright: February 3, 2010
Linguistics
From the journal Volume 48 Issue 1

Abstract

This article reviews research on English past-tense acquisition to test the validity of the single mechanism model and the dual mechanism model, focusing on regular-irregular dissociation and semantic bias. Based on the review, it is suggested that in L1 acquisition, both regular and irregular verbs are governed by semantics; that is, early use of past tense forms are largely restricted to achievement verbs — regular or irregular. In contrast, some L2 acquisition studies show stronger semantic bias for regular past tense forms (Housen, The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect, John Benjamins, 2002). It is argued that L1 acquisition of the past-tense morphology can be accounted for adequately — without assuming dual mechanisms — by relying on connectionist-like input-based prototype formation as a mechanism for the development of tense-aspect morphology.


Department of Linguistics, 2806 Cathedral of Learning, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. E-mail:

Received: 2006-03-07
Revised: 2007-10-09
Published Online: 2010-02-03
Published in Print: 2010-January

© 2010 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/New York

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling.2010.005/html
Scroll to top button